An Independent Examination of the Los Angeles Police Department 2020 Protest Response

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

An Independent Examination of the Los Angeles Police Department 2020 Protest Response An Independent Examination Of The Los Angeles Police Department 2020 Protest Response Report by Independent Counsel, Gerald Chaleff AN INDEPENDENT EXAMINATION OF THE LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT 2020 PROTEST RESPONSE 1 AN INDEPENDENT EXAMINATION OF THE LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT 2020 PROTEST RESPONSE Table of Contents I. Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... 4 II. Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 14 Section 2.01 Background and Methodology ........................................................................ 14 Section 2.02 Civil Unrest in Los Angeles ............................................................................... 15 Section 2.03 Consent Decree ............................................................................................... 16 Section 2.04 Settlements in Los Angeles .............................................................................. 16 Section 2.05 Department Organization ................................................................................ 18 Section 2.06 Incident Command System Concept ............................................................... 19 III. Timeline Summary of Major Events ........................................................................................ 21 IV. Observations and Findings ...................................................................................................... 24 Section 4.01 Planning ........................................................................................................... 24 (a) Public Information and Messaging ............................................................................. 26 Section 4.02 Command and Control .................................................................................... 26 (a) Command and Control ............................................................................................... 27 (b) Intelligence ................................................................................................................. 27 (c) Operations Central Bureau Command Post ............................................................... 29 (d) Operations Central Bureau Staging Area.................................................................... 30 (e) Operations West Bureau Command Post ................................................................... 31 (f) Mutual Aid .................................................................................................................. 32 Section 4.03 Public Order Policing ....................................................................................... 34 (a) Mobile Field Force Configuration ............................................................................... 38 (b) Shadow Teams ............................................................................................................ 40 Section 4.04 Less Lethal Tools .............................................................................................. 41 (a) 40mm Launcher Deploying the 40 mm eXact iMpact Sponge Round ....................... 41 (b) 37mm Launcher Deploying the 37 mm Foam Baton Black Powder Round ............... 42 (c) Beanbag Shotgun ........................................................................................................ 42 (d) Hornets Nest Sting Grenade, .60 Caliber Rubber Balls............................................... 43 (e) Less Lethal Use............................................................................................................ 43 2 AN INDEPENDENT EXAMINATION OF THE LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT 2020 PROTEST RESPONSE (f) Handheld Baton .......................................................................................................... 45 Section 4.05 Planning for Mass Arrests and Citations ......................................................... 46 (a) Citations Related to Mass Arrests .............................................................................. 46 (b) Transportation of Arrestees ....................................................................................... 48 (c) Field Jails ..................................................................................................................... 49 Section 4.06 Preparedness and Training .............................................................................. 50 Section 4.07 Wellness ........................................................................................................... 53 Section 4.08 Community Input ............................................................................................. 56 V. Conclusion ............................................................................................................................... 57 VI. List of Findings ........................................................................................................................ 58 VII. Recommendations .................................................................................................................. 65 VIII. Appendix ................................................................................................................................. 76 Appendix 1: Review Team Members and Other Contributors .......................................... 76 Appendix 2: Methodology and Limitations ........................................................................ 79 Appendix 3: 1992 After-Action Report Findings ................................................................ 81 Appendix 4: 2001 Consent Decree Details ......................................................................... 82 Appendix 5: 2000 DNC National Lawyers Guild Settlement Information .......................... 83 Appendix 6: 2007 MacArthur Park Settlement .................................................................. 84 Appendix 7: 2011 Occupy Los Angeles ............................................................................... 85 Appendix 8: 2014 Ferguson................................................................................................ 86 Appendix 9: Key Terms ....................................................................................................... 87 Appendix 10: Incident Command System Structures .......................................................... 91 Appendix 11: LAPD and FEMA National Concepts of Emergency Management ................. 93 Appendix 12: LAPD Less Lethal Tools ................................................................................... 94 Appendix 13: History of Training 1992-2020 ....................................................................... 96 IX. Bibliography ............................................................................................................................ 99 3 AN INDEPENDENT EXAMINATION OF THE LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT 2020 PROTEST RESPONSE I. Executive Summary The death of George Floyd sparked protests across the United States. The protests in Los Angeles began on May 27, 2020 and continued for many weeks. In Los Angeles there were many peaceful protests, but some erupted in violence, arson, looting and vandalism. On June 30, the Los Angeles City Council approved a motion that the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) prepare an after action report, and that Gerald Chaleff lead the review of the Department’s actions during the protests. This report has been prepared pursuant to that motion, although the Department ultimately decided to prepare its own report. Because of that decision, an independent review team was assembled to prepare this report. In the protests in Los Angeles in May-June 2020, there were small groups that were primarily responsible for the violence and criminal activity, which resulted in the disruption of protestors’ ability to exercise their First Amendment rights. Additionally, these disrupters were throwing dangerous objects at the police. The level of violence committed by these small groups had not been seen at demonstrations in years. The lack of adequate planning and preparation caused the Department to be reactive, rather than proactive, and inhibited the Department’s ability to have better control over the violence being committed by small groups of individuals whose objectives were to create chaos and confrontation with the police. Additionally, looting occurred that appeared to be well coordinated with “scouts” and convoys of up to ten cars targeting a given location. It was also believed that some of the organized looting was gang related while other looting seemed to be opportunistic. When the police responded to interdict or make arrests the looters would quickly disperse only to regroup elsewhere to attack another target. The Department initially did not have enough resources or strategies to contain the looting. Eventually using tactics developed by the air unit observers, officers were able to make arrests and reduce the amount of looting that occurred. The Review Team found deficiencies in the following areas that impacted the Department’s actions during the protests: (1) planning, (2) command and control, (3) public order policing, (4) less lethal tools, (5) mass arrests, (6) preparedness and training and (7) wellness. PLANNING It appears the Department believed that if protests arising out of George Floyd’s death occurred in Los Angeles,
Recommended publications
  • The Divided Beliefs Behind a Seemingly United Movement an Ipsos POV in Diversity & Inclusion
    I CAN’T BREATHE: The Divided Beliefs Behind a Seemingly United Movement An Ipsos POV in Diversity & Inclusion By Marie Lemay, James Diamond, and Nina Seminara May 25 marks the one-year anniversary of the killing of George Floyd, an event that sparked outrage against police brutality—particularly toward Black people—in Floyd’s hometown of Minneapolis. Soon after, Americans in over 2,000 cities across all 50 states began organizing demonstrations, with protests extending beyond America’s borders to all corners of the world. Though most of the protests were peaceful, there were instances of violence, vandalism, destruction and death in several cities, provoking escalated police intervention, curfews and in some cases, the mobilization of the National Guard. The nationwide engagement with the Black Lives Matter movement throughout the 2020 protests, and data from a survey conducted nearly a year later showing 71% of Americans believed Chauvin is guilty of murder, paint the picture of a seem- ingly united people. ENGAGEMENT WITH THE GEORGE FLOYD PROTESTS MADE IT CLEAR THAT MANY AMERICANS ACROSS THE NATION ARE NO LONGER WILLING TO TOLERATE RACIAL INJUSTICE. Key Takeaways: • However, major gaps in perception exist when comparing how Black and White Americans understood and perceived the 2020 protests. • Ipsos conducted several national surveys throughout the duration of the Black Lives Matter protests to gain a sense of Americans’ attitudes and opinions towards the events that unfolded. Here’s what we found. 2 IPSOS | I CAN’T BREATHE: THE DIVIDED BELIEFS BEHIND A SEEMINGLY UNITED MOVEMENT What is your personal view on the Do you support or oppose the protests circumstances around the death and demonstrations taking place of George Floyd in Minneapolis? across the country following the death of George Floyd in Minneapolis? % It was murder.
    [Show full text]
  • Transcript Was Exported on Jun 15., 2020 View Latest Versiun Here
    27-CR-20-12951 Filed in District Court State of Minnesota - 7/7/2020 11:00 AM This transcript was exported on Jun 15., 2020 View latest versiun here.- Speaker 1: [silence] Speaker 1: Before they drive off, he’s parked right here, Its a fake bill from the Gentlemen, sorry. ' Kueng: - The driver in there? - LanerThe blue Benz? . I Speaker 1: Which one? Speaker3 : That blue one over there. Kueng Which one? Lane: yup-yup Just head back In. They're moving around a lot. Let me see your hands. George Floyd: Hey, man. I'm sorry! Lane: Stay in the car, let me see your other hand. George Floyd: l'm sorry, I'm sorry! Lane: Let me see your other hand! George Floyd: Please, Mr. Officer. Lane: Both hands. George Floyd: ldidn‘t do nothing. Lane: Put your fucking hands up right now! Let me see yOur other hand. Shawanda Hill: let him see your other hand George Floyd: All right. What l do though? What we do Mr Ofcer? Lane: Put your hand up there. Put your fucking hand up there! Jesus Christ, keep your fucking hands on the wheel. George Floyd: igot shot. [crosstalk 00:02:00]. EXHIB'T Lane: § 0‘3}?st Axon_Body_3_Video_2020-05-25_2008 (Completed 06/10/20) Transcript by Rev.com Page l of 25 27-CR-20-12951 Filed in District Court State of Minnesota 7/7/2020 11:00 AM This Lmnscript was exported on Jun IS. 3020 - view latest version here. Keep your fucking hands on the wheel. George Floyd: Yes, sir.
    [Show full text]
  • Sheppard, Liebenberg to Receive Bar Honors at Oct. 20 Quarterly
    Philadelphia ® The Monthly Newspaper of the Philadelphia Bar Association Vol. 37, No. 10 October 2008 Sheppard, Liebenberg to Receive Women Bar Honors at Oct. 20 Quarterly Leaders on Role, Future on Oct. 20 n By Jeff Lyons A panel of women executives from across Philadelphia will discuss the role and future of female leaders at the Associ- ation’s Quarterly Meeting and Luncheon on Monday, Oct. 20. Moderated by CBS-TV 3’s evening weekend anchor, Mary Stoker Smith, panelists include Arlene Ackerman, CEO, School District of Philadelphia; Nina M. Gussack, chair, executive commit- tee, Pepper Hamilton LLP; Tara Weiner, managing partner of the Philadelphia office of Deloitte & Touche USA LLP; Women in the Profession Committee Co-Chair Danielle Banks (left) joins Co-Chair Maria A. Feeley (right) in congratulat- and Ahmeenah Young, president and ing Roberta D. Liebenberg on being named the recipient of the 2008 Sandra Day O’Connor Award. CEO, Pennsylvania Convention Center state or federal bench, whether active Authority. n By Jeff Lyons or retired, who has made a significant, “Oct. 20 will be a day to salute the positive impact on the quality or ad- ongoing role of women in the profession Philadelphia Court of Common ministration of justice in Philadelphia is continued on page 17 Pleas Senior Judge Albert W. Sheppard eligible for consideration. Examples of Jr. and former Women in the Profes- accomplishments worthy of nomination sion Committee Co-Chair Roberta D. include innovations in court administra- In This Issue Liebenberg will be presented with two of tion, implementation of pioneering case 4 Chancellor’s Forum the Association’s most prestigious awards management techniques, assumption at the Monday, Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • Ads Play on Fear As Trump Raises Tension in Cities
    C M Y K Nxxx,2020-07-22,A,001,Bs-4C,E1 Late Edition Today, clouds and sunshine, show- ers, thunderstorms, humid, high 90. Tonight, thunderstorms, low 77. To- morrow, strong thunderstorms, hu- mid, high 90. Weather map, Page C8. VOL. CLXIX . ...No. 58,762 © 2020 The New York Times Company NEW YORK, WEDNESDAY, JULY 22, 2020 $3.00 ADS PLAY ON FEAR AS TRUMP RAISES TENSION IN CITIES AN EFFORT TO TAR BIDEN Clashes With Protesters Used to Fuel Message of ‘Law and Order’ This article is by Maggie Ha- berman, Nick Corasaniti and Annie Karni. As President Trump deploys federal agents to Portland, Ore., and threatens to dispatch more to other cities, his re-election cam- paign is spending millions of dol- lars on several ominous television ads that promote fear and dovetail with his political message of “law and order.” The influx of agents in Portland has led to scenes of confrontations and chaos that Mr. Trump and his White House aides have pointed to as they try to burnish a false narrative about Democratic elected officials allowing danger- ous protesters to create wide- spread bedlam. The Trump campaign is driving home that message with a new ad that tries to tie its dark portrayal of Democratic-led cities to Mr. Trump’s main rival, Joseph R. Bi- den Jr. — with exaggerated im- ages intended to persuade view- PHOTOGRAPHS BY MASON TRINCA FOR THE NEW YORK TIMES ers that lawless anarchy would In Portland, Ore., federal officers in camouflage have used aggressive tactics like firing tear gas canisters against protesters, which included a peaceful line of mothers.
    [Show full text]
  • Police Defunding and Reform : What Changes Are Needed? / by Olivia Ghafoerkhan
    ® About the Authors Olivia Ghafoerkhan is a nonfiction writer who lives in northern Virginia. She is the author of several nonfiction books for teens and young readers. She also teaches college composition. Hal Marcovitz is a former newspaper reporter and columnist who has written more than two hundred books for young readers. He makes his home in Chalfont, Pennsylvania. © 2021 ReferencePoint Press, Inc. Printed in the United States For more information, contact: ReferencePoint Press, Inc. PO Box 27779 San Diego, CA 92198 www.ReferencePointPress.com ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. No part of this work covered by the copyright hereon may be reproduced or used in any form or by any means—graphic, electronic, or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, taping, web distribution, or information storage retrieval systems—without the written permission of the publisher. Picture Credits: Cover: ChameleonsEye/Shutterstock.com 28: katz/Shutterstock.com 6: Justin Berken/Shutterstock.com 33: Vic Hinterlang/Shutterstock.com 10: Leonard Zhukovsky/Shutterstock.com 37: Maury Aaseng 14: Associated Press 41: Associated Press 17: Imagespace/ZUMA Press/Newscom 47: Tippman98x/Shutterstock.com 23: Associated Press 51: Stan Godlewski/ZUMA Press/Newscom LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CATALOGING- IN- PUBLICATION DATA Names: Ghafoerkhan, Olivia, 1982- author. Title: Police defunding and reform : what changes are needed? / by Olivia Ghafoerkhan. Description: San Diego, CA : ReferencePoint Press, 2021. | Series: Being Black in America | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: LCCN 2020048103 (print) | LCCN 2020048104 (ebook) | ISBN 9781678200268 (library binding) | ISBN 9781678200275 (ebook) Subjects: LCSH: Police administration--United States--Juvenile literature. | Police brutality--United States--Juvenile literature. | Discrimination in law enforcement--United States--Juvenile literature.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of Militarization and Use of Force
    LIVING IN OCCUPIED TERRITORY: A STUDY OF MILITARIZATION AND USE OF FORCE Cori Pryor A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS May 2020 Committee: Thomas Mowen, Advisor Steve Demuth Danielle Kuhl ii ABSTRACT Thomas Mowen, Advisor Police militarization is happening on a widespread scale across the United States. However, very little is known about its relationship with use of force. At the same time, there has been a growing focus on community policing. Given the concurrent establishment of both of these trends, it is problematic that we do not know how these two tactics interplay with one another, especially in regard to use of force. Additionally, though force is thought to be a mechanism of social control that is unequally distributed in nonwhite communities, studies examining the link between militarization and use of force have yet to include race/ethnicity into their analysis. This paper attempts to address this important gap in the literature by examining the relationship between militarization and use of force through the lens of minority threat theory. I use data from Law Enforcement Management and Statistics 2013, American Community Survey 2009, and Uniform Crime Reports 2013, as well as item response theory and multivariate regression techniques to study this relationship. Results show that militarization is positive and significantly related to the number of use of force incidents recorded by an agency. Additionally, community policing shares a positive and significant relationship with use of force. However, neither racial demographics nor community policing moderate the relationship between militarization and use of force.
    [Show full text]
  • News Release George Floyd Justice in Policing
    Fortified by the Past… Focused on the Future RELEASE FOR: WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 24, 2021 CONTACT: Tkeban X.T. Jahannes (404) 944-1615 | [email protected] Civil Rights Leaders Call on Congress To Pass George Floyd Justice In Policing Act Today, civil rights leaders called on the U.S. House of Representatives to pass the George Floyd Justice in Policing Act – a critical step to holding law enforcement accountable for unconstitutional and unethical conduct. The 2020 killing of George Floyd sparked a year of national protests in all 50 states calling for an end to police brutality against Black and Brown communities and a demand for accountability in every sector of law enforcement. Addressing this nation’s history of violent, discriminatory policing requires passing legislation that advances systemic reforms rooted in transparency and accountability. It is the responsibility of the federal government to set standards on justice, policing, and safety. A vital step in this process is the passage of the George Floyd Justice in Policing Act, which recognizes the importance of stripping law enforcement of qualified immunity; creating a national registry of police misconduct complaints; declaring prohibitions for law enforcement profiling; limiting the transfer of military-grade equipment to state and local law enforcement; and restricting funds from law enforcement agencies that do not prohibit the use of chokeholds. “The killing of George Floyd held a mirror up to a truth about the American legal system. It showed us in the most stark and irrefutable way, that there are deep, fundamental problems with how this country allows law enforcement to intimidate, abuse, torture, and kill unarmed Black people.
    [Show full text]
  • First Amended Complaint Alleges As Follows
    Case 1:20-cv-10541-CM Document 48 Filed 03/05/21 Page 1 of 30 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In Re: New York City Policing During Summer 2020 Demonstrations No. 20-CV-8924 (CM) (GWG) WOOD FIRST AMENDED This filing is related to: CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT AND Charles Henry Wood, on behalf of himself JURY DEMAND and all others similarly situated, v. City of New York et al., No. 20-CV-10541 Plaintiff Charles Henry Wood, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, for his First Amended Complaint alleges as follows: PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1.! When peaceful protesters took to the streets of New York City after the murder of George Floyd in the summer of 2020, the NYPD sought to suppress the protests with an organized campaign of police brutality. 2.! A peaceful protest in Mott Haven on June 4, 2020 stands as one of the most egregious examples of the NYPD’s excessive response. 3.! It also illustrates the direct responsibility that the leaders of the City and the NYPD bear for the NYPD’s conduct. 4.! Before curfew went into effect for the evening, police in riot gear surrounded peaceful protesters and did not give them an opportunity to disperse. 5.! The police then charged the protesters without warning; attacked them indiscriminately with shoves, blows, and baton strikes; handcuffed them with extremely tight plastic zip ties; and detained them overnight in crowded and unsanitary conditions during the COVID-19 pandemic. 1 Case 1:20-cv-10541-CM Document 48 Filed 03/05/21 Page 2 of 30 6.! The NYPD’s highest-ranking uniformed officer, Chief of Department Terence Monahan, was present at the protest and personally oversaw and directed the NYPD’s response.
    [Show full text]
  • Blacklivesmatter—Getting from Contemporary Social Movements to Structural Change
    Georgetown University Law Center Scholarship @ GEORGETOWN LAW 2021 #BlackLivesMatter—Getting from Contemporary Social Movements to Structural Change Jamillah Bowman Williams Georgetown University Law Center, [email protected] Naomi Mezey Georgetown University Law Center, [email protected] Lisa O. Singh Georgetown University, [email protected] This paper can be downloaded free of charge from: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/2387 https://ssrn.com/abstract=3860435 California Law Review Online, Vol. 12, Reckoning and Reformation symposium. This open-access article is brought to you by the Georgetown Law Library. Posted with permission of the author. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Law and Race Commons, and the Law and Society Commons #BlackLivesMatter— Getting from Contemporary Social Movements to Structural Change Jamillah Bowman Williams*, Naomi Mezey**, and Lisa Singh*** Introduction ................................................................................................. 2 I. Methodology ............................................................................................ 5 II. BLM: From Contemporary Social Movement to Structural Change ..... 6 A. Black Lives Matter as a Social Media Powerhouse ................. 6 B. Tweets and Streets: The Dynamic Relationship between Online and Offline Activism ................................................. 12 C. A Theory of How to Move from Social Media
    [Show full text]
  • Resources on Racial Justice June 8, 2020
    Resources on Racial Justice June 8, 2020 1 7 Anti-Racist Books Recommended by Educators and Activists from the New York Magazine https://nymag.com/strategist/article/anti-racist-reading- list.html?utm_source=insta&utm_medium=s1&utm_campaign=strategist By The Editors of NY Magazine With protests across the country calling for systemic change and justice for the killings of George Floyd, Ahmaud Arbery, Breonna Taylor, and Tony McDade, many people are asking themselves what they can do to help. Joining protests and making donations to organizations like Know Your Rights Camp, the ACLU, or the National Bail Fund Network are good steps, but many anti-racist educators and activists say that to truly be anti-racist, we have to commit ourselves to the ongoing fight against racism — in the world and in us. To help you get started, we’ve compiled the following list of books suggested by anti-racist organizations, educators, and black- owned bookstores (which we recommend visiting online to purchase these books). They cover the history of racism in America, identifying white privilege, and looking at the intersection of racism and misogyny. We’ve also collected a list of recommended books to help parents raise anti-racist children here. Hard Conversations: Intro to Racism - Patti Digh's Strong Offer This is a month-long online seminar program hosted by authors, speakers, and social justice activists Patti Digh and Victor Lee Lewis, who was featured in the documentary film, The Color of Fear, with help from a community of people who want and are willing to help us understand the reality of racism by telling their stories and sharing their resources.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Police Violence? Plain Language Toolkit
    What is Police Violence? A plain language booklet about anti-Black racism, police violence, and what you can do to stop it 1 Introduction We are writing this booklet in June of 2020. Right now, there are protests all over the country about racism and police violence. We wrote this booklet in plain language so as many people as possible can understand the protests. There is a lot to know about racism and police violence. We can’t talk about everything in this short booklet. We will tell you where to learn more. And, we will work on more resources. This booklet is just to get you started. Racism is when people are treated unfairly because of their race. Anti-Black racism is when Black people are treated unfairly because they are Black. People can do racist things. For example: Byron is Black. He wants to rent a house. Tyler is white. He owns a house, and wants to rent it out. Byron comes to see Tyler’s house. Tyler lies to Byron because Byron is Black. Tyler tells Byron that the house is not up for rent. Tyler only wants to rent his house to white people. Tyler was being racist when he lied to Byron. Society does racist things. For example: There are many times where a Black person and a white person do the same crime. Usually, the Black person will go to jail for longer. The white person might not even go to jail! The way our society deals with crime is racist. It is set up to hurt Black people.
    [Show full text]
  • Militarization and Perceptions of Law Enforcement in the Developing World: Evidence from a Conjoint Experiment in Mexico
    Militarization and Perceptions of Law Enforcement in the Developing World: Evidence from a Conjoint Experiment in Mexico Gustavo Flores-Macías Jessica Zarkin Cornell University Cornell University [email protected] [email protected] DRAFT June 5, 2020 Abstract Although a growing body of research suggests that the constabularization of the military for domestic policing is counterproductive, this increasingly prevalent policy has nonetheless enjoyed widespread support in the developing world. This study advances our understanding of the consequences of militarization for perceptions of law enforcement: whether visual features shape perceptions of effectiveness, respect for civil liberties, proclivity for corruption, and acceptance of militarization in one’s own neighborhood. Based on a nationally representative, image-based, conjoint experiment conducted in Mexico, we find that military weapons and uniforms enhance perceptions of effectiveness and respect for civil liberties. We also find that gender shapes perceptions of civil liberties and corruption, but we find no effect for skin color. The findings suggest that a central feature of militarization linked to greater violence—military weapons—is paradoxically a key factor explaining favorable attitudes, and that women can play a crucial role in improving perceptions of law enforcement. Keywords: Militarization; policing; law enforcement; perceptions; conjoint experiment; effectiveness; civil liberties; Latin America; Mexico. Across the world, governments have increasingly militarized law enforcement. Although in the developed world militarization has taken place in the form of police adopting characteristics of the armed forces—as with the proliferation of SWAT teams and the use of military gear in local police departments—in broad parts of the developing world it has also taken the form of constabularized militaries taking on domestic law enforcement roles.
    [Show full text]