DOCSLIB.ORG

Mangrove Project Suriname Cie4061-09 Multidisciplinary Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mangrove Project Suriname Cie4061-09 Multidisciplinary Project MAY 1, 2018 MANGROVE PROJECT SURINAME CIE4061-09 MULTIDISCIPLINARY PROJECT INSTRUCTORS: DR. IR. M. BOSCH-REKVELDT IR. S. TAS PRERPARED BY: C. ÇETE S. HAAGE V. HARDWARSING S. KALLOE A. MA-AJONG i MANGROVE PROJECT SURINAME Course CIE4061-09 Multidisciplinary Project Master programmes Construction Management and Engineering Hydraulic Engineering Universities Delft University of Technology Anton de Kom University of Suriname Project location Paramaribo, Suriname (South America) Prepared by: C. Çete, 4285883 S. Haage, 4268660 V. Hardwarsing, 4433165 S. Kalloe, 4295269 A. Ma-Ajong, 4221427 Supervisors Dr. Ir. M. Bosch-Rekveldt (Netherlands) Ir. S. Tas (Netherlands) Prof. Dr. S. Naipal (Suriname) Project sponsors: Royal Boskalis Corestats N.V. Cirkel Group N.V. Guimar De Surinaamsche Bank N.V. ii MAIN SPONSOR LOCAL SPONSORS EDUCATION PARTNERS iii DISCLAIMER The content of this report is the result of a Multidisciplinary Project conducted by students from Delft University of Technology and is made for educational purposes only. It should be noted that neither TU Delft nor the students can be held responsible for the use of the report outside of this educational scope. iv PREFACE This report has been made for the course Multidisciplinary Project (CIE4061-09), with a project group of five students from two different disciplines. A project in Suriname related to mangrove rehabilitation was executed. The rehabilitation was researched at the Weg naar Zee coast taking into account the socio-technical factors. First, we would like to thank the project’s sponsors because their contributions made our project possible. We would also like to extend our gratitude to supervisors Dr.ir. M. Bosch-Rekveldt and Ir. S. Tas for their useful guidance and support throughout this entire project. Gratitude should also be extended to Prof.dr.ir. J. Winterwerp (TU Delft) and Ir. S. Sangster (Boskalis) for their advice during this project. Finally, to our supervisor in Suriname, professor of Water and Climate at the Anton de Kom University of Suriname (AdeKUS), Prof. Dr. S. Naipal. We would like to extend our gratitude to him for guiding us for eight weeks and giving us insightful and valuable knowledge, but also for taking the time to answer our questions and facilitating us during our time in Suriname. Delft, May 2018 Ceylan Çete Samantha Haage Vishay Hardwarsing Sudarshini Kalloe Alyssa Ma-Ajong v SUMMARY The Weg naar Zee (WnZ) region of Suriname’s capital Paramaribo is dealing with coastal erosion. Images from the past 30 years have shown coastal retreats of up to 1.3 km. Mangrove forest used to be present in large numbers at the location. These mangrove forests enhance accretion, but due to different reasons, the number of mangroves has decreased significantly. Reasons are extensive land- use, climate change and periodic absence of mudbanks. Also, mangrove trees are removed by local people. Several attempts have been made to rehabilitate the mangrove at WnZ. Sediment Trapping Units have been constructed, with the purpose to enhance accretion and thereby create conditions for mangrove development. The units consist of walaba poles with bamboo as filling material. From bed level change results, field observations and interviews, it could be concluded that there is room for improvement. Therefore, the following goal of the project had been formulated: ‘To present methods for mangrove rehabilitation at the WnZ coast, which can be supported by the key stakeholders’. To present mangrove rehabilitation methods, it was necessary to gain insight regarding the WnZ stakeholders’ involvement when it comes to coastal management. Fourteen key stakeholders were identified. Then, the stakeholders were analyzed in order to understand their power, interests, goals, resources and overall position. On the basis of dependency and replaceability, three critical actors were found: Government of Suriname, AdeKUS and Inhabitants of the WnZ region. Especially stakeholders who are classified as the ‘irritant’ type need to be engaged so that they do not block the project. Inhabitants of the WnZ region belong to this category and therefore a survey among this group was conducted. Knowing the WnZ inhabitants’ involvement and the current situation at WnZ, the success factors and design requirements were then determined. The analysis showed out that the most important success factors and design requirements were that the mangrove forest must have a width of 450 m, must be dense and must consist of more than one mangrove specie. Also, a minimum bed slope of 1:1000 and a minimum sedimentation of 0.6 meter is required. Knowing the success factors and design requirements, resulted in the analysis of which mangrove rehabilitation designs are applicable and supported by the WnZ region stakeholders. The first step was conducting a Multi-Criteria Analysis (MCA) in which five alternatives with their variants are weighed on seven criteria of which the technical-, environmental- and feasibility criteria have the highest weighting. From this analysis the top three variants are: 1) Adapted STU, 2) STU with Nourishment and 3) STU with chenier. These three variants are more elaborated into three preliminary designs. In the first design, the STUs are adapted such that sedimentation inside the STUs is expected. In the second design, a nourishment is placed inside the adapted STUs. In this design dredged material is taken from a borrow pit 4 km from the shore. In the third design a chenier is placed 2 km from the shore. Finally, support by stakeholders for the mangrove rehabilitation designs can only be gained if they are engaged. This was tackled by composing a comprehensive stakeholder engagement plan. In this plan, the following three strategies are formulated: 1) Setting up a bamboo farm, 2) Setting up a Mangrove Vacation Resort and 3) Growing salt-tolerant plants. These strategies can contribute to the economic development of the region if implemented, which could then also benefit the various stakeholders. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE .................................................................................................................................................. v SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................................. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................. vii LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................................... x LIST OF TABLES ...................................................................................................................................... xiii LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................................................ xiv LIST OF SYMBOLS ................................................................................................................................... xvi 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Problem statement.................................................................................................................. 3 1.2 Research goal and questions ................................................................................................... 4 1.3 Scope ....................................................................................................................................... 4 1.4 Approach ................................................................................................................................. 5 1.5 Report structure ...................................................................................................................... 5 2. CURRENT SITUATION OF THE WEG NAAR ZEE REGION ................................................................... 6 2.1 Overview of the Weg naar Zee region ..................................................................................... 6 2.2 Physical aspects ....................................................................................................................... 8 2.2.1 Coastal Climate at Weg naar Zee ..................................................................................... 8 2.2.2 Morphodynamics ............................................................................................................ 8 2.2.3 Hydrodynamics .............................................................................................................. 11 2.3 Mangroves at the Weg naar Zee region ................................................................................ 14 2.4 Sediment Trapping Units (STUs) ............................................................................................ 15 3. STAKEHOLDER IDENTIFICATION & ANALYSIS ................................................................................. 20 3.1 Methodology ......................................................................................................................... 20 3.2 Stakeholder identification ..................................................................................................... 20 3.3 Stakeholder analysis .............................................................................................................. 22 4. DESIGN REQUIREMENTS ..............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Perceptions of and Resp in Rceptions of and Responses to Climate
    Perceptions of and Responses to Climate Change in Paramaribo, Surinam - Casper de Vries - In Completion of Master of Science (MSc.) Program: Latin American and Caribbean Studies Utrecht University, The Netherlands August 2012 Author: Casper de Vries Contact: [email protected] Academic Year: September 2011-August 2012 Degree: Master of Science (MSc.) Master’s Program: Latin American and Caribbean Studies Utrecht University Faculty of Social Sciences Department of Cultural Anthropology Supervisor: Prof. Dr. C.G. (Kees) Koonings Second Reader: Dr. J. G. (Hans) de Kruijf Cover picture: the Waterside, Paramaribo (own work) Material of this study used should be cited 2 Acknowledgments Three months of designing research, four months fieldwork and three months of writing have led to the result of this Master Thesis. Through all these stages I have been supported by my parents, from the initial stage on they supported me through all the challenges, I am thankful for the options I have been granted. I am grateful for all the respondents in the field who were willing to give their personal insights and stories. Without their enthusiasm and their great kindness and honesty it would not have been possible to present this Thesis. From this place I would also like to thank Kees Koonings, my supervisor who has during these three stages always given me great input from the finest detail to the bigger picture, among others he presented me the ‘channels and dams’ which contributed to the end result of this Thesis. Casper de Vries, Utrecht, August 20, 2012 3 Abstract In this study perceptions on climate changes, causes, consequences and responses of individual inhabitants, small farmers and market sellers and the government in Paramaribo, Surinam are outlined.
    [Show full text]
  • (Part III) for Environment and Climate Change Under
    EN THIS ACTION IS FUNDED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION ANNEX III of the Commission Implementing Decision on the Annual Action Programme 2019 (part III) for Environment and Climate Change under the Global Public Goods and Challenges Thematic Programme, to be financed from the general budget of the Union Action Document for the project ‘GCCA+ support for Climate Change Adaptation in Suriname – Phase 2’ ANNUAL PROGRAMME This document constitutes the annual work programme in the sense of Article 110(2) of the Financial Regulation and action programme/measure in the sense of Articles 2 and 3 of Regulation N° 236/2014. 1. Title/basic act/ GCCA+ support for Climate Change Adaptation in Suriname – Phase 2 CRIS number CRIS number: ENV/2019/042-181 financed under the Development Cooperation Instrument. 2. Zone benefiting Suriname from the action/location The action shall be carried out at the following locations: the coastal zone of Suriname with a focus on (1) Nickerie and Coronie Districts and on (2) Paramaribo for institutional support activities at national level. 3. Programming Multi-annual Indicative Programme (MIP) 2018 – 2020 of the Global document Public Goods and Challenges thematic programme (GPGC) 4. SDGs Main SDGs: 13 (Climate Action) and 6 (Clean Water and Sanitation) Other significant SDGs: 15 (Life on Land), 8 (Decent Work and Economic Growth), 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities) 5. Sector of Environment and Climate Change DEV. Assistance: YES intervention/ thematic area 6. Amounts Total estimated cost: EUR 5 500 000 concerned Total amount of EU budget contribution EUR 5 000 000 This action is co-financed in joint co-financing by UNDP for an amount of EUR 500 000 [1] 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Structuur Analyse Districten 2009-2013
    STRUCTUUR ANALYSE DISTRICTEN 2009-2013 STICHTING PLANBUREAU SURINAME December 2014 Structuuranalyse Districten IV Ruimtelijke ontwikkeling van de districten INHOUDSOPGAVE Ten geleide ................................................................................................................ ii Colofon ..................................................................................................................... iii Afkortingen ............................................................................................................... iv I DEMOGRAFISCHE ANALYSE Demografische analyse ......................................................................................... D-1 II RUIMTELIJKE ONTWIKKELING VAN DE DISTRICTEN 1. Paramaribo .................................................................................................. S-1 2. Wanica ...................................................................................................... S-22 3. Nickerie ..................................................................................................... S-38 4. Coronie ...................................................................................................... S-60 5. Saramacca ................................................................................................ S-72 6. Commewijne .............................................................................................. S-90 7. Marowijne ................................................................................................ S-109
    [Show full text]
  • THE DEMOGRAPHIC EVOLUTION of SURINAM 1920-1970 to Norine VERHANDELINGEN VAN HET KONINKLIJK INSTITUUT VOOR T AAL-, LAND- EN VOLKENKUNDE
    THE DEMOGRAPHIC EVOLUTION OF SURINAM 1920-1970 To Norine VERHANDELINGEN VAN HET KONINKLIJK INSTITUUT VOOR T AAL-, LAND- EN VOLKENKUNDE 65 THE DEMOGRAPHIC EVOLUTION OF SURINAM 1920 - 1970 A socio-demographic analysis H. E. LAMUR THE HAGUE - MAR TINUS NIJHOFF 1973 I.S.B.N. 90.247.1556.3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish first and foremost to record my thanks to Professor W. Steigenga for his constant guidance and encouragement. I am also grateful to him for the freedom he allowed me, both as regards the framework of the investigation and the analysis of the data collected. His critical approach contributed in no small degree to the study being brought to a successful conclusion, and my only hope is that I have succeeded in making fuIl use of his commen tso I also wish to express my gratitude to Professor A. J. F. Köbben for his criticism and valuable suggestions. The data for the study were collected and partially processed by H. A. C. Boldewijn, W. J. Doest, D. P. Kaulesar Sukul, R. 1. Korsten, M. R. Kortram, A. R. Lamur and H. C. Limburg. Their enthusiasm, which never faltered even through the trying periods when the data were being gathered, afforded me great support. I owe them my warm est thanks. I am also grateful to Mr. J. Pinas for his assistance. For permis sion to collect the data for this study 1 wish to thank the District Commissioners, the Heads of the Offices for Population Administration and the Head of the Central Office for Population Administration. When subjecting some of the data to statistical analysis I enlisted the aid of Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Wet Van Tot Vaststelling Van De 15
    WET VAN TOT VASTSTELLING VAN DE 15- DE AFDELING VAN DE ONTWERP BEGROTING VAN UITGAVEN EN ONTVANGSTEN VOOR HET DIENSTJAAR 2015 BETREFFENDE HET MINISTERIE VAN OPENBARE WERKEN ONTWERP DE PRESIDENT VAN DE REPUBLIEK SURINAME, In overweging genomen hebbende, dat de Surinaamse begroting bij wet dient te worden vastgesteld; Heeft, de Staatsraad gehoord, na goedkeuring door De Nationale Assemblée, bekrachtigd de onderstaande wet. Artikel 1 De 15-E Afdeling van de begroting van uitgaven en ontvangsten voor het dienstjaar 2015 betreffende het MINISTERIE VAN OPENBARE WERKEN wordt als volgt vastgesteld. DIRECTORAAT BOUWKUNDIGE WERKEN EN DIENSTVERLENING TITEL I: Apparaatskosten Bedragen x SRD 1.000 Kostensoort Bedrag 10 Personeelskosten 12.927 20 Materiële kosten 5.097 30 Subsidie en bijdragen 1 40 Aanschaffingen 337 Totaal Apparaatskosten 18.362 TITEL II: Beleidsprogramma’s Bedragen x SRD 1.000 Beleidsmaatregel Bedrag 100 Verbetering van landsgebouwen met hun toebehoren 8.000 101 Bouw en uitbreiding van landsgebouwen en ambtenarenwoningen 72.978 103 Bouwen van landsgebouwen 1.475 104 Volkswoningbouw 120.051 106 Ruimtelijke ordening urbane gebieden 1.610 Totaal Beleidsprogramma’s 204.114 1 TITEL III: Middelenbegroting Bedragen x SRD 1.000 Omschrijving Bedrag Code Ontvangsten 80.40.08 Bouwvergunningsrecht 325 80.50.99 Diverse niet belasting ontvangsten 5 80.60.06 Bijdragen bestekkosten 25 Totaal Niet Belasting Middelen 355 90.10 Ontvangen leningen 90.10.01 China ontvangen leningen 98.500 Totaal ontvangen leningen 98.500 Totaal middelenbegroting 98.855
    [Show full text]
  • Suriname-FRA-REPORT-FINAL.Pdf
    MINSTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORT AND COMMUNICATION Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Paramaribo Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Final Report November, 2017 Public Disclosure Authorized Acknowledgements The Paramaribo Strategic Flood Risk Assessment, produced as part of the Greater Paramaribo Flood Risk Management Program, is the result of World Bank technical work started in 2016 at the request of the Government of Suriname through the Minister of Public Works. Numerous entities and professionals interested in the subject participated and an important group of collaborators made possible the materialization of this assessment. The team especially wishes to thank the guidance and leadership of Sophie Sirtaine (former Country Director, LCC3C and current Strategy and Operations Director, IEGDG), Tahseen Sayed Khan (Country Director, LCC3C), Pierre Nadji (Senior Country Officer, LCC3C), Sameh Naguib Wahba Tadros (Director GSURB), and Ming Zhang (Practice Manager GSU10). Leading Authors and Editors: The assessment was prepared by a group of specialists in disaster risk management led by Armando Guzman (Task Team Leader, GSURR), that included Scott Ferguson (GSURR), Isabella Bovolo (GSURR), Juliana Castano-Isaza (GSURR), Mark Lawless (JBA Consulting), Matt Eliot (JBA Consulting), Aliastair Dale (JBA Consulting) and Jose Sabatini (JBA Consulting). Team: The complete work team included: The Government of Suriname, with particular technical contributions from Satish Mohan and his team of engineers from the Ministry of Public works; Sukarni Sallons-Mitro from Ministry of Public Works, Meteorological Services; Armand Amatali from Ministry of Public Works, Hydraulic research division; Col. Jerry Slijngard from National Coordination Centre for Disaster Preparedness (NCCR); Krieshen Ramkhelawan from the Ground and Land Information System Management Institute (GLIS); and JBA UK Limited, who carried out much of the computational modelling work.
    [Show full text]
  • Wood Energy in Suriname
    WOOD ENERGY IN SURINAME “Contribution of Forest Sector to the Energy Supply” Foundation for Forest Management and Production Control Forestry Economic Services Drs. R. Matai S.R. Jagessar BSc. L. Egerton February 2015 Wood energy in Suriname PREFACE This survey research into wood energy was initiated by the Directorate of Forestry Economic Services of the Foundation for Forest Management and Production Control (SBB). We would like to express our gratitude to the following persons and institutions. The Director of The Amazone Conservation Team Suriname (ACT), Ms. M. Parahoe, for her assistance in the gathering of data in the villages of Sipaliwini, Tëpu and Apetina. Ms. M Playfair MSc, Head of the Forestry Department of the Center for Agricultural Research in Suriname (CELOS), for her critical comments. For the successful gathering of data, assistance was received from the colleagues of Forestry Economic Services, Mr. S.R. Jagessar and Mr. L. Egerton. Assistance with the gathering of data was also received from the staff members of SBB: Mr. C. Sabajo, Assistant Senior Manager Forest Management Mr. S. Jubithana, Assistant Senior Forest Guard Mr. B. Simson, Officer Forest Management Mr. G. Lie A Lien, Junior Officer Task Force Mr. D. Rambali, Junior Officer Task Force Mr. A. Manuka, Assistant Senior Forest Guard Mr. G. Finisie, Team Manager Forest Management Mr. D. James, Junior Officer Forest Management Mr. K. Lugard, Senior Forest Guard Mr. C. Kaarsbaan, Forest Guard Mr. A. Pramsoekh, Assistant Junior Officer Research and Development A special word of appreciation goes to the General Director of SBB, Mr. P. S. Jules, for giving us the opportunity to carry out this study and publish the results.
    [Show full text]
  • Staatsolie Maatschappij Suriname N.V
    Staatsolie Maatschappij Suriname N.V. ENVIRONMENTAL SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE PROPOSED STAATSOLIE POWER PLANT IN SARAMACCA 2019 Report prepared in collaboration with: Draft Report January 2019 SARAMACCA ESMP 2019 Table of Contents ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................................1 1 INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................1 1.1 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ................................................................. 4 1.2 DESCRIPTION OF THE ESMP ........................................................................ 4 1.2.1 Purpose and scope of the ESMP ............................................................. 4 1.2.2 Structure of the ESMP ............................................................................ 4 2 ENVIRONMENTAL PROCEDURES.....................................................................5 2.1 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITY ......................................................................... 5 2.1.1 Construction Phase Roles and Responsibilities ..................................... 5 2.1.2 Operational Phase Roles and Responsibilities ...................................... 8 2.2 ENVIRONMENTAL TRAINING ......................................................................... 8 2.3 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT ............................................................... 9 2.3.1 Introduction .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Mineral Industry of Suriname in 1998
    THE MINERAL INDUSTRY OF SURINAME By Alfredo C. Gurmendi In 1998, Suriname had a population of about 0.5 million in a import duties on equipment used for mining, milling, and 163,000-square-kilometer area. Suriname’s economy was future expansions. Expenditures on prospecting, exploration, based largely on bauxite, the main source of alumina and and other preproduction costs can be written off during the first aluminum, which accounted for almost 70% of the country’s 5 years of operations (Radhakishun, 1997, p. 2-4; Alibux and exports of $568 million and about 15% of its estimated gross Mackenzie, 1998a, p. 3). domestic product of $2.65 billion1 in 1998 (Alibux and Under Suriname’s current mining law, four types of mining Mackenzie, 1998a, p. 3; Hall, 1999, p. 1A). The Netherlands, titles, which cover diamond, gold, and other minerals, can be Norway, and the United States were the principal markets for issued. These mining titles were reconnaissance rights for up Suriname’s exports. Trade between the United States and to 200,000 hectares (ha) for a maximum of 3 years; exploration Suriname amounted to $289 million ($88 million of exports rights for up to 40,000 ha for a maximum of 7 years; and $201 million of imports to and from the United States, exploitation rights for up to 10,000 ha for 25 years; and small respectively) (Hall, 1999, p. 1A). The principal mineral export mining rights for alluvial or shallow mining (Ministry of of Suriname remained aluminum, which was produced at a rate Natural Resources, 1997, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Dienstverleners
    DIENSTVERLENERS NAAM VOORNAAM FUNCTIE ADRES BUURT TELEFOON STICHTING PARTICULIERE ALGEMEEN ARTS ABRAHAM PH SAMSONSTRAAT CENTRUM 442222 HUISARTSEN PRAKTIJK 9-11 AZP ABAS DENIE S ALGEMEEN ARTS TOURTONNELAAN 175 TOURTONNE 1 472312 ABHELAKH SHUMPREKASH ALGEMEEN ARTS RIO DE JANEIROSTRAAT 8 BENIE'S PARK 440429 AKRUM-JONG A KIEM LOUISE M ALGEMEEN ARTS MR. EDUARD J. BRUMASTRAAT PARAMARIBO 473043 30 ALENDY CYNTHIA ALGEMEEN ARTS VAN 'T HOOGERHUYSSTRAAT PARAMARIBO 7157732 100 (FAMILY PHYSICAN & PUBLIC HEALTH PROFESSIONAL) AMADTAJIB HIDAYATI S ALGEMEEN ARTS JOHANNES PONTWEG 14 PONTBUITEN 481955 ASGARALI-HIJLAARD JOAN E ALGEMEEN ARTS BURENSTRAAT 11 PARAMARIBO 473278 NAAM VOORNAAM FUNCTIE ADRES BUURT TELEFOON ASHIM HAROLD ALGEMEEN ARTS HADJIE SULTAN KALLANWEG LIVORNO 486140/486150 221 BAJNATH WALDO S ALGEMEEN ARTS G.G. MAYNARDSTRAAT 7 NIEUW NICKERIE 231456 BAKKER WILLEM ALGEMEEN ARTS VAN IDSINGASTRAAT 19 PARAMARIBO 422464 BALDEWSING D ALGEMEEN ARTS MR. P. CHANDIE SHAWWEG 202 JARIKABA 328088 (STICHTING MEDISCHE ZORG JARIKABA EN OMGEVING) BANSIA* R A ALGEMEEN ARTS LATOURWEG 48 LATOUR 483393 BECK* FERDY ALGEMEEN ARTS PRINS HENDRIKSTRAAT 16 COMBE 471212 BHAGWANDIEN* SAMBHODATH ALGEMEEN ARTS NIEUW WEERGEVONDENWEG NW 482498 307 WEERGEVONDEN BHAGWANDIN OSCAR ALGEMEEN ARTS KNIKKERSTRAAT 2A RAMGOELAM 481000 (MARNIE FAMILY CLINIC) NAAM VOORNAAM FUNCTIE ADRES BUURT TELEFOON BILGOE ROBERTINO ALGEMEEN ARTS KWATTAWEG 366 KWATTA 465217 BIRBAL RITESH ALGEMEEN ARTS HAIDERALIWEG 42 GARNIZOENSPAD 8715795 (DHIR MEDICAL CENTER) BIRDJA GIETA ALGEMEEN ARTS TWEE KINDERENWEG
    [Show full text]
  • Welkom Onderweg in Suriname
    Welkom Welkom 6 Ter oriëntatie 8 Kennismaking, Suriname in cijfers 10 Geschiedenis, heden, toekomst 14 Overnachten 16 Eten en drinken 18 Praktische informatie 20 Onderweg in Suriname Paramaribo 32 Paramaribo 32, Braamspunt 59 Ten zuiden van Paramaribo 60 Lelydorp 60, Domburg 62, Paranam 67 Jodensavanne 70, Brokopondomeer 71, Brownsberg 72 Naar het oosten 74 Commewijne plantages 74, Moengo 81 Albina 81, Marowijne 86, Galibi 88 Naar het westen 90 Weg naar Zee 90, Groningen 90 Coronie 90, Wageningen 94 Nieuw Nickerie 94, Corantijn 95 Binnenland 99 Blanche Marie 99, Centraal Suriname Natuurreservaat 99 Kabalebo 100, Raleigh Vallen 102 Boven-Suriname 104, Awarradam 108 Kwamalasamutu 110, Palumeu 111 Houten huizen in Paramaribo - de historische binnenstad 34 Het ene pand is UNESCO Werelderfgoed, het andere zakt langzaam in. Ma Retraite en Blauwgrond - fietsen door Paramaribo-Noord 44 Ruime woonwijken, een populaire shoppingmall en 'klein-Java'. Trefpunt van veel Surinamers - eten aan de Waterkant 54 De sfeervolste terrasjes van de stad, als je ervan houdt. ©Qo©0oe@@e®@ Idyllisch 'pleintje* aan de rivier - fietstocht naar Domburg 63 Op uw gemak langs de rivier naar Domburg en de volgende dag terug. Verkoelend bruin water - Colakreek en Zanderij 68 Traditioneel populair dagtochtje van Surinamers. Langs oude plantages - fietstocht door Commewijne 78 Gezamenlijk cultureel en industrieel erfgoed in landelijke omgeving. Een trip langs marroncultuur - Moengo en de Cottica 82 Bauxiet, oorlog en kunst in een prachtig landschap. Leatherbacks en Green Turtles - idyllisch Galibi 88 Grote zeeschildpadden leggen eieren tussen februari en augustus. Aan de Saramacca - een tochtje naar Groningen 92 Landelijke rust bij een mislukte volksplanting.
    [Show full text]
  • D. Van Dusseldorp Geografische Mobiliteit En De Ontwikkeling Van Suriname
    D. van Dusseldorp Geografische mobiliteit en de ontwikkeling van Suriname In: Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde 119 (1963), no: 1, Leiden, 18-55 This PDF-file was downloaded from http://www.kitlv-journals.nl Downloaded from Brill.com10/06/2021 05:17:28AM via free access GEOGRAFISCHE MOBILITEIT EN DE ONTWIKKELING VAN SURINAME 1. Inleiding. 2. De immigratie. 3. De binnenlandse migratie. 4. De urbanisatie. 5. De geografische mobiliteit bezien in het kader van de ontwikkeling van Suriname. 1. Inleiding. I n het navolgende zal worden getracht een inzicht te geven in de geografische mobiliteit van de bevolking van Suriname. Daar vele groepen van deze bevolking nog maar sinds enkele generaties in het land wonen en een deel van de geografische mobiliteit hierdoor bepaaild wordt, zal eerst een overzicht worden gegeven van de diverse immigratiegolven waaruit de veelkleurige bevolking van Suriname is ontstaan. Daarna zal aan de hand van een aaratal cijfers van de volks- telling 1950 een indruk worden gegeven van de geografische mobiliteit binnen Suriname van de in dat jaar getelde bevolking. Vervolgens zal worden ingegaan op het spectaculaire verschijnsel van de urbanisatie en de problemen welke zich bij de ontwikkeling van Suriname voor- doen als gevolg van de grote geografische mobiliteit van de Surinaamse bevolking. 2. De immigratie. Wanneer men in het rapport van de Volkstelling 1950 leest dat de Surinaamse bevolking (TAV deel X, biz. 6) voor 46 % uit Black- coloured (in Suriname beter 'bekend als Creolen),, voor 31,2 fo uit Hindoestanen, 17,6 % uit Indonesiers, voor 1,2 % uit Chinezen, 1,3 % uit Europeanen, 1,7 % uit Indianen en 1 % uit overige landaarden (rassen) bestaat, dan mag men hieruit de conclusie trekken dat tot voor korte tijd grote bevolkingsgroepen uit verschillende delen van de wereld Suriname zijn binnengekomen.
    [Show full text]