DOCSLIB.ORG

De Historische Binnenstad Van Paramaribo Werelderfgoedstad Management Plan 2020-2024

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
De Historische Binnenstad Van Paramaribo Werelderfgoedstad Management Plan 2020-2024 De Historische Binnenstad van Paramaribo Werelderfgoedstad Management Plan 2020-2024 0-1 Stichting Gebouwd Erfgoed Suriname Ministerie van Onderwijs, Wetenschap en Cultuur, Republiek van Suriname Paramaribo World Heritage Associates © Copyright, 2019 All rights reserved 0 0-2 De Historische Binnenstad van Paramaribo Werelderfgoedstad Management Plan 2020-2024 Stichting Gebouwd Erfgoed Suriname Ministerie van Onderwijs, Wetenschap en Cultuur , Republiek van Suriname Paramaribo World Heritage Associates 1 juli 2019 Afb. 1 – Omslag, de historische Waterkant van de Werelderfgoedstad Paramaribo, Suriname (IDB, 2011) 0-3 INHOUD DEEL 2 MANAGEMENT……………………………………………………………………5-60 5 Huidige managementcontext ......................................................... 5-62 Dankwoord……………………………………………………………………………………….0-6 Voorwoord……………………………………………………………………………………….0-7 5.1 Huidige Managementplan ....................................................... 5-62 Afkortingen ........................................................................................... 0-8 5.2 Stichting Gebouwd Erfgoed Suriname (SGES) ......................... 5-63 Samenvatting……………………………………………………………………………………0-9 5.3 SWOT - analyse voor SGES ...................................................... 5-63 5.4 Stedelijk / Ministerieel bestuur ............................................... 5-64 DEEL 1 PARAMARIBO ......................................................................... 0-11 6 UNESCO/ICOMOS-aanbevelingen .................................................. 6-68 1 Inleiding .......................................................................................... 1-13 7 SDGs, New Urban Agenda .............................................................. 7-72 1.1 Een unieke plek, gemeenschapelijke uitdagingen ................. 1-14 8 Benadering van Historic Urban Landscape .................................... 8-77 1.2 Belang van een bruisend stadscentrum ................................. 1-16 8.1 Paramaribo HUL - open ruimtes -waterwegen -straten ......... 8-79 1.3 Wat ontbreekt er? .................................................................. 1-18 8.2 Implementatie van de aanpak – koppeling van de HUL, 1.4 Het doel van dit Managementplan ........................................ 1-23 architectuurbehoud en duurzaam toerisme met behulp 1.5 Methodologie ......................................................................... 1-25 van de HUL - Toolkit ................................................................ 8-84 2 Paramaribo ..................................................................................... 2-26 8.3 Toepassing van de HUL -- Paramaribo merk Alakondre.......... 8-85 2.1 Beschrijving en de geschiedenis ............................................. 2-26 8.4 Aanbeveling: een raamwerk voor implementatie van HUL .... 8-87 2.2 Locatie, grenzen, setting ........................................................ 2-33 8.5 Toepassing van de HUL - Toolkit – samenvatting.................... 8-89 2.3 Bufferzones............................................................................. 2-36 8.5.1 Gelaagdheid van de site .......................................................... 8-89 2.4 Archeologie ............................................................................. 2-39 8.5.2 Achtergrond ........................................................................... 8-89 2.5 Demografie ............................................................................. 2-41 8.5.3 Management van verandering ................................................ 8-90 2.6 Inschrijving op de Werelderfgoedlijst………………………………….2-44 8.5.4 Perspectieven en resultaten: lege openbare ruimtes, 2.7 Stedelijke architectuur ........................................................... 2-46 waterwegen, straten .............................................................. 8-90 3 Betekenis van Paramaribo .............................................................. 3-47 9 Rampenrisicobeoordeling, praatheid & management .................. 9-92 4 Fysieke staat van de stedelijke architectuur .................................. 4-48 9.1 Bedoeling en aanpak ............................................................... 9-92 4.1 Inventarisatie .......................................................................... 4-51 9.2 Risicoprofiel voor veiligheid en beveiliging van Paramairibo 9-94 4.2 Hergebruik…………………………………………………………………………..4-55 9.3 Kort overzicht van wettelijke en institutionele kaders……….9-102 4.3 Conserveringsstrategieën ....................................................... 4-56 9.4 SWOT-analyse ....................................................................... 9-103 9.5 Aanbevelingen voor het verkleinen vanrampenrisico's………9-104 9.6 DRPMP - Monitoringplan ...................................................... 9-107 10 Strategie erfgoedtoerisme & publieke bewustwording ........ 10-108 10.1 Duurzaam toerisme internationaal paradigma en bewustwording van belanghebbenden .............................. 10-109 10.2 Gedeelde waarden: Historic Urban Landscape benadering koppelen aan de benadering van duurzaam toerisme ...... 10-113 10.3 Aanbevelingen voor duurzaam toerisme ............................ 10-114 0-4 DEEL 3 IMPLEMENTATIE ................................................................ 10-121 11 De weg voorwaarts ................................................................. 11-123 11.1 Implementatie .................................................................... 11-123 11.2 Visie, doelen, doelstellingen & taken ................................. 11-123 11.3 Paramaribo Urban Rehabilitation Program ....................... 11-127 11.4 Operationeel actieplan ....................................................... 11-128 11.5 Gedetailleerde korte-termijntaken .................................... 11-135 11.6 Institutioneel plan .............................................................. 11-129 11.7 Partnerschappen ............................................................... 11-152 11.6 Monitoring en periodieke beoordeling .............................. 11-155 12 Verandering van financiering ................................................. 12-156 12.1 Huidige situatie ................................................................... 12-156 12.2 Verzekering ......................................................................... 12-157 12.3 Mogelijke oplossingen…………………………………………………….12-157 13 Vijfjaren begroting ................................................................. 13-159 Appendix ........................................................................................ 13-164 Huidige kaarten .................................................................................. 13-164 Historische kaarten............................................................................. 13-174 Stakeholders ....................................................................................... 13-181 Referenties ......................................................................................... 13-184 Index van afbeeldingen ............................................................... 13-193 0-5 Dankwoord Het was een voorrecht om aan deze update van het Managementplan te mogen werken. Niet alleen hebben wij de prachtige houten architectuur Paramaribo World Heritage Associates: leren kennen, maar ook de genius loci van Paramaribo, de inzet van de staf van de Stichting Gebouwd Erfgoed Suriname, de heer Stephen Fokké en de stakeholders die we hebben ontmoet. Zij zijn de ware ‘genii locorum’ Michael A. Newton, Executive Project Director (Curaçao) (beschermgeesten) van deze prachtige stad. Rand Eppich, Team Leader, Organization Management (Spain / USA) We moeten oprecht de Stichting Gebouwd Erfgoed Suriname (SGES) en Stephen bedanken voor het feit dat ze ons deze gelegenheid hebben Patricia E. Green, Ph.D., Architect, Architectural Conservation, Heritage geboden, voor het geven en delen van hun tijd en expertise en voor het Tourism, (Jamaica) voortdurend beschikbaar te zijn voor feedback. Dank gaat ook uit naar Magda Stepanyan, Emergency Disaster Response Expert (Netherlands) Harrold Sijlbing, hoewel hij deel uitmaakte van het team zullen ook de andere leden zijn onschatbare hulp en grondig inzicht als auteur van het vorige managementplan erkennen. Zijn managementplan uit 2011 was een onmisbaar uitgangspunt om Paramaribo, zijn uitdagingen en zijn potentieel te begrijpen. Deze update van het managementplan is een uitbreiding van zijn werk. Dank ook aan zijn voormalige medewerkers. Daarnaast heeft Harrold met inzet de stakeholderbijeenkomsten georganiseerd en onze activiteiten in Paramaribo gecoördineerd. We moeten ook de toegewijde professionals bedanken die in de loop der jaren Paramaribo hebben bezocht en trouw hebben gerapporteerd over de status ervan. Speciale dank gaat ook uit naar wijlen Ron van Oers, voor wie - zoals wij weten - Paramaribo een speciale plaats innam. Ten slotte willen we de stakeholders van de gemeenschap, particuliere bedrijven en overheidsinstanties bedanken die ons hun tijd hebben gegeven en hun gedachten over de historische stad met ons hebben gedeeld. Het is onze oprechte wens dat dit document zal bijdragen aan het verbeteren van het beheer en het behoud van de prachtige stad Paramaribo. 0-6 Voorwoord toerisme, hoewel in Paramaribo nog niet merkbaar, niettemin toegenomen. Paramaribo zal worden ontdekt, omdat het veel culturele en De uitdaging voor ons vandaag is om de historische binnenstad van natuurlijke attracties
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Perceptions of and Resp in Rceptions of and Responses to Climate
    Perceptions of and Responses to Climate Change in Paramaribo, Surinam - Casper de Vries - In Completion of Master of Science (MSc.) Program: Latin American and Caribbean Studies Utrecht University, The Netherlands August 2012 Author: Casper de Vries Contact: [email protected] Academic Year: September 2011-August 2012 Degree: Master of Science (MSc.) Master’s Program: Latin American and Caribbean Studies Utrecht University Faculty of Social Sciences Department of Cultural Anthropology Supervisor: Prof. Dr. C.G. (Kees) Koonings Second Reader: Dr. J. G. (Hans) de Kruijf Cover picture: the Waterside, Paramaribo (own work) Material of this study used should be cited 2 Acknowledgments Three months of designing research, four months fieldwork and three months of writing have led to the result of this Master Thesis. Through all these stages I have been supported by my parents, from the initial stage on they supported me through all the challenges, I am thankful for the options I have been granted. I am grateful for all the respondents in the field who were willing to give their personal insights and stories. Without their enthusiasm and their great kindness and honesty it would not have been possible to present this Thesis. From this place I would also like to thank Kees Koonings, my supervisor who has during these three stages always given me great input from the finest detail to the bigger picture, among others he presented me the ‘channels and dams’ which contributed to the end result of this Thesis. Casper de Vries, Utrecht, August 20, 2012 3 Abstract In this study perceptions on climate changes, causes, consequences and responses of individual inhabitants, small farmers and market sellers and the government in Paramaribo, Surinam are outlined.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mineral Industry of Suriname in 1998
    THE MINERAL INDUSTRY OF SURINAME By Alfredo C. Gurmendi In 1998, Suriname had a population of about 0.5 million in a import duties on equipment used for mining, milling, and 163,000-square-kilometer area. Suriname’s economy was future expansions. Expenditures on prospecting, exploration, based largely on bauxite, the main source of alumina and and other preproduction costs can be written off during the first aluminum, which accounted for almost 70% of the country’s 5 years of operations (Radhakishun, 1997, p. 2-4; Alibux and exports of $568 million and about 15% of its estimated gross Mackenzie, 1998a, p. 3). domestic product of $2.65 billion1 in 1998 (Alibux and Under Suriname’s current mining law, four types of mining Mackenzie, 1998a, p. 3; Hall, 1999, p. 1A). The Netherlands, titles, which cover diamond, gold, and other minerals, can be Norway, and the United States were the principal markets for issued. These mining titles were reconnaissance rights for up Suriname’s exports. Trade between the United States and to 200,000 hectares (ha) for a maximum of 3 years; exploration Suriname amounted to $289 million ($88 million of exports rights for up to 40,000 ha for a maximum of 7 years; and $201 million of imports to and from the United States, exploitation rights for up to 10,000 ha for 25 years; and small respectively) (Hall, 1999, p. 1A). The principal mineral export mining rights for alluvial or shallow mining (Ministry of of Suriname remained aluminum, which was produced at a rate Natural Resources, 1997, p.
    [Show full text]
  • D. Van Dusseldorp Geografische Mobiliteit En De Ontwikkeling Van Suriname
    D. van Dusseldorp Geografische mobiliteit en de ontwikkeling van Suriname In: Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde 119 (1963), no: 1, Leiden, 18-55 This PDF-file was downloaded from http://www.kitlv-journals.nl Downloaded from Brill.com10/06/2021 05:17:28AM via free access GEOGRAFISCHE MOBILITEIT EN DE ONTWIKKELING VAN SURINAME 1. Inleiding. 2. De immigratie. 3. De binnenlandse migratie. 4. De urbanisatie. 5. De geografische mobiliteit bezien in het kader van de ontwikkeling van Suriname. 1. Inleiding. I n het navolgende zal worden getracht een inzicht te geven in de geografische mobiliteit van de bevolking van Suriname. Daar vele groepen van deze bevolking nog maar sinds enkele generaties in het land wonen en een deel van de geografische mobiliteit hierdoor bepaaild wordt, zal eerst een overzicht worden gegeven van de diverse immigratiegolven waaruit de veelkleurige bevolking van Suriname is ontstaan. Daarna zal aan de hand van een aaratal cijfers van de volks- telling 1950 een indruk worden gegeven van de geografische mobiliteit binnen Suriname van de in dat jaar getelde bevolking. Vervolgens zal worden ingegaan op het spectaculaire verschijnsel van de urbanisatie en de problemen welke zich bij de ontwikkeling van Suriname voor- doen als gevolg van de grote geografische mobiliteit van de Surinaamse bevolking. 2. De immigratie. Wanneer men in het rapport van de Volkstelling 1950 leest dat de Surinaamse bevolking (TAV deel X, biz. 6) voor 46 % uit Black- coloured (in Suriname beter 'bekend als Creolen),, voor 31,2 fo uit Hindoestanen, 17,6 % uit Indonesiers, voor 1,2 % uit Chinezen, 1,3 % uit Europeanen, 1,7 % uit Indianen en 1 % uit overige landaarden (rassen) bestaat, dan mag men hieruit de conclusie trekken dat tot voor korte tijd grote bevolkingsgroepen uit verschillende delen van de wereld Suriname zijn binnengekomen.
    [Show full text]
  • Vulnerability and Capacity Assessment Report Weg Naar Zee
    Self-made dam by owner of pilgrimage Vulnerability and Capacity Assessment Report Weg naar Zee Risk analysis based on possible effects of Climate Change 2014 Compilers: Blinker, Humphrey (Disaster Management Officer / Focal point CC Suriname Red Cross) Commissioned by SGP Suriname Contents Risk analysis based on possible effects of Climate Change 2014 ............................................................. 0 List of Abbreviations ..................................................................................................................................... 2 List of graphics .............................................................................................................................................. 2 List of Pictures .............................................................................................................................................. 2 Methodology................................................................................................................................................. 3 Community Baseline ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Baseline results ............................................................................................................................................. 6 Analyses .................................................................................................................................................... 6 History of Weg naar Zee ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • In and out of Suriname Caribbean Series
    In and Out of Suriname Caribbean Series Series Editors Rosemarijn Hoefte (Royal Netherlands Institute of Southeast Asian and Caribbean Studies) Gert Oostindie (Royal Netherlands Institute of Southeast Asian and Caribbean Studies) Editorial Board J. Michael Dash (New York University) Ada Ferrer (New York University) Richard Price (em. College of William & Mary) Kate Ramsey (University of Miami) VOLUME 34 The titles published in this series are listed at brill.com/cs In and Out of Suriname Language, Mobility and Identity Edited by Eithne B. Carlin, Isabelle Léglise, Bettina Migge, and Paul B. Tjon Sie Fat LEIDEN | BOSTON This is an open access title distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-NC 3.0) License, which permits any non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. The realization of this publication was made possible by the support of KITLV (Royal Netherlands Institute of Southeast Asian and Caribbean Studies). Cover illustration: On the road. Photo by Isabelle Léglise. This publication has been typeset in the multilingual “Brill” typeface. With over 5,100 characters covering Latin, IPA, Greek, and Cyrillic, this typeface is especially suitable for use in the humanities. For more information, please see www.brill.com/brill-typeface issn 0921-9781 isbn 978-90-04-28011-3 (hardback) isbn 978-90-04-28012-0 (e-book) Copyright 2015 by the Editors and Authors. This work is published by Koninklijke Brill NV. Koninklijke Brill NV incorporates the imprints Brill, Brill Nijhoff and Hotei Publishing. Koninklijke Brill NV reserves the right to protect the publication against unauthorized use and to authorize dissemination by means of offprints, legitimate photocopies, microform editions, reprints, translations, and secondary information sources, such as abstracting and indexing services including databases.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mineral Industry of Suriname in 2001
    THE MINERAL INDUSTRY OF SURINAME By Philip A. Szczesniak In 2001, Suriname continued to be one of the top 10 leaders bauxite production will come from the Lelydorp III deposit, in the world in the production of bauxite and was a growing which has reserves of 19.5 million metric tons (Mt) at a grade of producer of crude petroleum and gold. Suriname also produced about 53% Al2O3 and will produce 2 Mt/yr of ore (Alibux and alumina, cement, clay, sand and gravel, and stone (crushed and Mackenzie, 1998). broken). Other mineral resources included chromium, clay, The Gross Rosebel gold property, which is located 80 copper, diamond, iron ore, manganese, nickel, platinum, and tin. kilometers (km) south of the capital of Paramaribo, was the In 2001, the gross domestic product was estimated on the basis most advanced gold development in Suriname. In 2001, of purchasing power parity to be about $2.38 billion; leading Cambior, Inc., of Canada purchased the 50% holdings of industries were mining and agriculture. Exports in 2000 were Golden Star Resources Ltd. (GSRL) of the United States, thus valued at $484 million; alumina exports of $342 million increasing their holdings to 100%. Under the terms of the deal, accounted for more than 70% of all exports. Suriname’s Cambior agreed to give GSRL $5 million on closing the deal, population in 2000 was estimated to be 420,000 (World Bank, $1 million on the second, third, and fourth anniversaries of the 2001§1; International Monetary Fund, 2002§). close, and a royalty on a portion of the production from the The Geological and Mining Service is responsible for the initial few years of production.
    [Show full text]
  • Suriname on Its Knees
    CHAPTER VI Suriname on its knees The most important challenge for Suriname in the next decade is to achieve eco- nomic independence. We in Suriname must be able to take decisions on our own. We must be able to reap the benefi ts of our own resources and the products of our own efforts according to our own priorities. Only then will we be able to provide solutions to the problems which our people meet daily. (Bouterse cited in Uwechue 1986.) As outlined in the previous three chapters, the events of December 1982 plunged Suriname into severe socio-economic diffi culties. These were caused, on the one hand, by the termination of Dutch aid and, on the other hand, by the failure to establish close relations with regional powers or with Third World nations as a collective to compensate, at least partly, for this fi nancial shortfall. Consequently, to secure the regime’s survival, Bouterse realized that he had no choice but to improve Suriname’s relations with the Netherlands, so as to be able to negotiate the terms for reinstating Dutch aid. In this, Paramaribo was forced to acknowledge The Hague’s primary stipu- lation for reopening the fl ow of fi nancial assistance: the reintroduction of democracy. Yet the military’s gradual shift towards democratic rule clashed with the Dutch demand that aid be provided only after the offi cers’ complete withdrawal from politics. Within the regime this setback led to frustration. During the transition period of 1984-1987 The Hague was repeatedly attacked for its uncompromising position.
    [Show full text]
  • Mangrove Project Suriname Cie4061-09 Multidisciplinary Project
    MAY 1, 2018 MANGROVE PROJECT SURINAME CIE4061-09 MULTIDISCIPLINARY PROJECT INSTRUCTORS: DR. IR. M. BOSCH-REKVELDT IR. S. TAS PRERPARED BY: C. ÇETE S. HAAGE V. HARDWARSING S. KALLOE A. MA-AJONG i MANGROVE PROJECT SURINAME Course CIE4061-09 Multidisciplinary Project Master programmes Construction Management and Engineering Hydraulic Engineering Universities Delft University of Technology Anton de Kom University of Suriname Project location Paramaribo, Suriname (South America) Prepared by: C. Çete, 4285883 S. Haage, 4268660 V. Hardwarsing, 4433165 S. Kalloe, 4295269 A. Ma-Ajong, 4221427 Supervisors Dr. Ir. M. Bosch-Rekveldt (Netherlands) Ir. S. Tas (Netherlands) Prof. Dr. S. Naipal (Suriname) Project sponsors: Royal Boskalis Corestats N.V. Cirkel Group N.V. Guimar De Surinaamsche Bank N.V. ii MAIN SPONSOR LOCAL SPONSORS EDUCATION PARTNERS iii DISCLAIMER The content of this report is the result of a Multidisciplinary Project conducted by students from Delft University of Technology and is made for educational purposes only. It should be noted that neither TU Delft nor the students can be held responsible for the use of the report outside of this educational scope. iv PREFACE This report has been made for the course Multidisciplinary Project (CIE4061-09), with a project group of five students from two different disciplines. A project in Suriname related to mangrove rehabilitation was executed. The rehabilitation was researched at the Weg naar Zee coast taking into account the socio-technical factors. First, we would like to thank the project’s sponsors because their contributions made our project possible. We would also like to extend our gratitude to supervisors Dr.ir.
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Management Plan North Coronie Area Suriname
    REPUBLIC OF SURINAME MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCES (NH) Suriname Forest Service (LBB) Nature Conservation Division (NB) in consultation with the Ministries of AGRICULTURE, ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AND FISHERIES (LVV) PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION (PLOS) REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT (RO) PUBLIC WORKS (OW) COASTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN for the NORTH CORONIE AREA in SURINAME (FINAL VERSION) prepared by: Pieter A. Teunissen Environmental Consultant PARAMARIBO, May 2000 Project sponsered by: RAMSAR CONVENTION'S SMALL GRANTS FUND (SGF) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In relation to the coastal zone, the Government of Suriname recognizes the multiple values and functions of coastal ecosystems (for comprehensive arguments: see Preamble) . The North Coronie area (see Map 6) is part of the highly productive estuarine zone of Suriname, and consists of several coastal wetland ecosystems: mudflats, mangrove forest, open lagoons and brackish grass swamps. The area is an important breeding and feeding area for scarlet ibises, egrets and herons. During northern winters, it also serves as an important feeding ground for migratory shorebirds from the North. The ecosystems and their biodiversity offer a range of ecotouristic activities that should be further developed. Next to this (1) the Coronie mangrove forests protect the coast against erosion, enhance sedimentation and stimulate coastal accretion; (2) its ecosystems are particularly important as spawning and nursery grounds for the marine fauna and (3) these ecosystems add value to the nearshore small-scale and offshore industrial fisheries. On March 18, 1985, the Republic of Suriname became a Contracting Party of the "Convention of Wetlands of International Importance, especially as Waterfowl Habitat", also known as the "Wetland Convention" or "Ramar Convention".
    [Show full text]
  • Valuation of Coastal Protection Near Paramaribo, Suriname by Lauretta
    Valuation of Coastal Protection near Paramaribo, Suriname by Lauretta Burke and Helen Ding Prepared for World Wildlife Fund Guianas February 3, 2016 Photo by Sofie Ruysschaert (WWF-G) 1 NOTE: This report reflects an analysis conducted by the authors for World Wildlife Fund Guianas (WWF-G). The report has not gone through an institutional review at the World Resources Institute (WRI) and should not be regarded as reflecting the views of WRI. Collaboration: This analysis benefited greatly from the reports and area descriptions provided by Edward Anthony (consultant contracted by WWF-G) and Sofie Ruysschaert (WWF-G, based in Suriname). In addition, this analysis relied heavily on spatial and socio-economic data assembled by Gregg Verutes (under contract with WWF-G). Gregg also provided expert input on modeling approaches and reviewed draft results. Results of the analysis will be integrated in an online mapping platform developed by Gregg: http://www.geointerest.frih.org/Suriname. 2 Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................... 4 2. Introduction and Study Purpose ........................................................................................................... 6 Collaborators and Data Sources ........................................................................................................ 7 3. Study Area ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Position and Residential Patterns of Ethnic Groups in Paramariboʼs Development in the Twentieth Century
    AD DE BRUIJNE & AART SCHALKWIJK THE POSITION AND RESIDENTIAL PATTERNS OF ETHNIC GROUPS IN PARAMARIBOʼS DEVELOPMENT IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY Suriname is a prime example of a multicultural Caribbean society. Surinameʼs capital, Paramaribo, has more different ethnic and cultural groups than any other Caribbean city. Whereas in a town like Kingston there is primarily a distinction between black and white, and in Georgetown and Port of Spain between black and Indian, Paramariboʼs population is made up of three main ethnic groups: Creoles, Hindustanis, and Javanese; and at least seven smaller ones: Amerindians, Europeans, Maroons, Chinese, Lebanese, and Brazilians. Moreover, over time an ethnically mixed group formed that originally consisted of people of mixed European and African heritage (known then as mulattoes), though it now also includes descendants of other mixed ethnic relations. In this group of mixed ethnicities, not one is numerically predomi- nant, and they come from all over the world: Western Europe, Western Africa, Bihar and West Bengal, Java, different parts of China, Lebanon, and more recently Brazil. One could say globalization took place in Suriname during its very founding as a plantation society (see also Hoefte & Meel 2001). The present-day population of Paramaribo largely descends from forced and semi-forced immigrants who came to the country mainly during the plan- tation era, though in sequence. Their move into the capital was also sequen- tial. After the abolition of slavery in 1863 and the immigration of Asian laborers to the plantations, Paramaribo became a “Creole” city dominating the “Asian” rural areas. As, at the beginning of the twentieth century, more Hindustanis and Javanese entered the city in search of new economic oppor- tunities and a better education for their children, the ethnic composition of the capital gradually changed.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    DOCUMENT OF INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION Public Disclosure Authorized Not For PublicUse Report No. CA-21a Public Disclosure Authorized BASIC REPORT ON THE ECONOMY OF SURINAM Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized November 2, 1972 America and Caribbean Region This report was prepared for official use only by the Bank Group. It may not be publithed, quoted or cited without BankGroup authorization. The Bank Group does not accept responsibilityfor the accuracy or completenessof the report. CURRENCYEQUIVALENTS Until December 31, 1971 1 Surinam Guilder (Sur. f.) = US$o.53 1 U.S.$ = 1.89 SarinamGuilder (Sur. f.) From January 1, 1972 1 Surinam Guilder (Sur. f.) = US$o.56 1 U.S.$ = 1.79 Surinam Guilder (Sur.f.) TABLF OF CONTENTS Page No. BASIC DATA i - iv MAP SLMIARY AND CONCLUSIONS ............................. i - iii I. SOME BACKGRDUNDFEATURES. 1 II. DEVELOPMENT TRENDS AND TARGETS. 4 Introduction. 4 The Sources of Economic Growth. 4 Money, Prices, and Wages. 8 Planning and Economic Management .... ................10 III. SECTORAL ISSUES AND POLICIES ........................ 15 M!ining ............................................ 15 Agriculture .......................................... 18 Forestry ............................................ 26 Manufacturing and Construction ...... ................27 Tourism ............................................ 29 Transport ........................................... 30 Social Services . ....................................
    [Show full text]