The World Wheat Situation, 1931-32 a Review of the Crop Year

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The World Wheat Situation, 1931-32 a Review of the Crop Year THE WORLD WHEAT SITUATION, 1931-32 A REVIEW OF THE CROP YEAR Persisting superabundance of wheat in the 1931-32 was below average and considerably midst of intensified economic depression dom­ smaller than in the preceding year, in spite of inated the world wheat situation in 1931-32. large shipments to China and Brazil. It did Burdensome wheat stocks heavily concen­ not fall as low as in 1929-30, when importing trated in visible positions, far-reaching re­ Europe had bumper crops of cereals and strictions on international trade, and unprece­ potatoes and large inward carryovers. But dentedly low wheat prices marked the crop Continental Europe imported very moderate year. World wheat disappearance ex-Russia quantities, chiefly for three reasons: 1931 slightly exceeded the high total of the pre­ domestic wheat crops were generally good, ceding year only because of still more exten­ though crops of rye, barley, and oats were sive diversion to low-price poor; 1932 crops in im­ outlets, notably feed use in porting Europe gave excel­ several countries and food CONTENTS lent promise; and govern­ use in the Orient. But the PAGE mental measures and finan­ net reduction in end-year World Wheal Supplies . ..... 64 cial conditions combined stocks was very small. De­ Governmental Operations and to impose severe restraints veloping prospects for an­ Regulations .............. 77 upon imports and con­ other big world crop in Wheat Prices .............. 86 sumption. North America 1932 affected markets and International Trade and Con- contributed only about 40 prices before new wheat sumption ................ 99 per cent of the exports, as was harvested, and disap­ Appendix Tables ........... 114 compared with 60 per cent pointed hopes that short or more in most years prior crops of winter wheat in to 1929-30; United States the United States and the Danube basin would and Canadian export surpluses were not substantially relieve the surplus condition in pressed out into world markets. Other ex­ 1932-33. porters except India shipped freely, and Aus­ World wheat stocks about August 1, 1931, tralia and the Danube basin exported record were 300 to 350 million bushels above normal. quantities. Except from Australia, flour ex­ The 1931 crop ex-Russia, after numerous up­ ports were greatly curtailed, and the total in­ ward revisions of estimates, proved nearly as ternational trade in flour was the smallest in large as in 1930. A bumper crop of winter more than a decade. wheat in the United States largely offset dras­ The course of international trade was tic reduction of the North American spring­ broadly similar to that in 1930-31. Heavy wheat crop. Good yields in Australia and Ar­ shipments from Russia and the Danube basin gentina almost wholly offset large decreases swelled the movement in August-October; big in acreage there. Europe ex-Russia and north­ exports from Australia and Argentina did the ern Africa had a wheat crop approaching the same in January-March. The December dip bumper post-war outturn of 1929, and larger was exceptionally pronounced. The spring than that of 1930 by almost as much as crops peak was nearly as high as in 1931, as Con­ in the four chief overseas exporting countries tinental Europe drew upon imports to sup­ were reduced. Although Russia's crop of 1931 plement depleted domestic supplies. Ship­ was much smaller than her big crop of 1930, ments declined with unusual severity in May­ net exports from the USSR were reduced by August, as European importing countries only about 50 million bushels. Hence wheat faced excellent crops with assurance of rigid supplies available to the world ex - Russia restraints upon milling of foreign wheats as nearly equaled the record supplies of 1930-31. soon as new domestic supplies became avail­ International trade in wheat and flour in able from the crop of 1932. WHEAT STUDIES, Vol. IX, No.3, December 1932 [ 63 ] 64 THE WORLD WHEAT SITUATION, 1931-32 World wheat prices in terms of gold fluc­ and the fact that the Grain Stabilization Cor­ tuated on the lowest levels of modern times, poration liquidated a substantial proportion and in terms of commodities in general on of its holdings. A few European importing levels that were probably the lowest in his­ countries succeeded, by rigorous measures, in tory. Prices sagged to new lows in the early keeping their wheat prices far above levels autumn of 1931. Speculative forces brought prevailing elsewhere. a sharp advance in October-November, but World visible supplies made new high most of the gain was soon lost. Late in the weekly and monthly records until near the crop year, as improved crop prospects coin­ end of the year. Total end-year stocks ex­ cided with extreme pessimism over the gen­ Russia were some 40 million bushels below eral economic outlook, prices declined to the record level of 1931, but were more heav­ about the low points of the fall of 1931. Prices ily concentrated in North America than ever in the United States, which had been sup­ before. The surplus carryover in the United ported by stabilization purchases in 1930-31, States exceeded a half-year's food require­ fell to fresh low levels in 1931-32; yet they ments of this country, and that of Canada were more or less persistently above export exceeded a year's domestic requirements for parity in spite of the huge exportable surplus seed and food. I. WORLD WHEAT SUPPLIES Stocks of old-crop wheat stood at record Russia, world crop ex - Russia, and Russian heights as the crop year opened. World stocks exports was about equal to the record total of ex-Russia about August 1, 1931, according to the year before (Chart 1). Before the end of our revised estimates (Table XXVI), were over 890 million bushels - some 40 million CHART 1.-WORLD WHEAT SUPPLIES, 1921-32* bushels above the previous peak in 1929 and (Billion bushels) about 80 million larger than in 1930. For the 4. 8 4.8 third year in succession they were far above 4. 8 "normal" levels, in 1931 by at least 300 to 350 4.6 4. 4 /1'\. I million bushels. Most of the surplus carry­ 7 4.4 over was in exporting countries, chiefly North .SUPPlier '\ 4. 2 4.2 America (Chart 11, p. 75). In addition, stocks / must have been fairly large in the USSR and 4. 0 V 4.0 (of import wheat) in and afloat to China, po­ 3. 8 / \ / Ji\ sitions for which no specific figures can be V \ V ,r-- 3 .8 included. 3. e II \ 3 .6 --- .~crops \ Early in the season it was expected and ex-Russia V 3. 4 hoped that the world wheat crop of 1931 l-- 3 .4 j\ / would fall short of the crop of 1930 by per­ 3. 2 / 3 .2 haps 200 to 300 million bushels,l and conse­ ~ \ V 0 3 .0 quently that total supplies would be mate­ 3'1921 1923 1925 1927 1929 1931 -22 '24 -26 -28 -30 -32 rially less than in the previous year. These * As defined in text. Data in Table XXXIII. expectations were not borne out. In several exporting countries (notably excluding Rus­ the crop year, moreover, the outlook for end­ sia) harvests materially exceeded early fore­ year stocks and the new crops of 1932 indi­ casts; and as world available supplies are cated that another year of superabundant now appraised, the sum of initial stocks ex- supplies lay immediately ahead. The persist­ ence of abnormally heavy stocks and the con­ tinued recurrence of huge world supplies 1 See World Wheat Prospects, .July 23 and Septem­ ber 3, 1931, and WHEAT STUDIES, September 1931, VII, were dominant factors in the crop year under 509-12. review. WORLD WHEAT SUPPLIES 65 Soft wheats were exceptionally abundant in Had the crop been 200 to 300 million bushels the world crop of 1931, with large crops of smaller, as was anticipated in the summer of soft red winter in the United States, soft 1931, it would have fallen well below the line white wheat in Australia, and the soft wheats of trend, and the world wheat surplus would commonly grown in Europe. But in spite of have been substantially reduced. short crops of spring wheat in North America, World wheat acreage ex-Russia in 1931 was hard bread wheats were also in ample supply, equal to the 1926-30 average but 9.4 million from big carryovers in North America, a acres less than the record total of 1930 (Chart bumper crop of hard red winter in the United 3). Heavy abandonment of spring-wheat acre- States, and substantial exports from Russia. Durum production, however, was the smallest CHART 3.-WORLD WHEAT ACREAGE AND YIELD PER for several years;l the United States crop was ACRE, Ex-RUSSIA, 1921-31* very short, Canada's small, and northern (Million acres; bushels per acre) Africa's somewhat below average; Italy alone 250 250 ACREAGE among the leading producers ex-Russia had a 240 ./ 240 good crop, importing much less durum than ./V 230 " -- 230 usua1.2 220 I /' 220 The world wheat crop of 1931 is shown in V .......... longer perspective in Chart 2, exclusive of 210 -- 210 200 200 China and a few minor producers for which 17 17 comparable data are lacking. Whether Rus­ YIELD PER ACRE 16 1 16 sia be included or excluded, the crop was a 15 / \. ".. VI\ big one, exceeded by those of 1928 and 1930 V '\V I \ V 15 14 - 14 CHAIIT 2.-WORLD WHEAT PRODUCTION, 1900-1931* 13 I 13 1921 1923 1925 1927 1929 1931 (Billion bushels; logarithmic vertical scale) • See Table I.
Recommended publications
  • Records of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, 1891-1957, Record Group 85 New Orleans, Louisiana Crew Lists of Vessels Arriving at New Orleans, LA, 1910-1945
    Records of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, 1891-1957, Record Group 85 New Orleans, Louisiana Crew Lists of Vessels Arriving at New Orleans, LA, 1910-1945. T939. 311 rolls. (~A complete list of rolls has been added.) Roll Volumes Dates 1 1-3 January-June, 1910 2 4-5 July-October, 1910 3 6-7 November, 1910-February, 1911 4 8-9 March-June, 1911 5 10-11 July-October, 1911 6 12-13 November, 1911-February, 1912 7 14-15 March-June, 1912 8 16-17 July-October, 1912 9 18-19 November, 1912-February, 1913 10 20-21 March-June, 1913 11 22-23 July-October, 1913 12 24-25 November, 1913-February, 1914 13 26 March-April, 1914 14 27 May-June, 1914 15 28-29 July-October, 1914 16 30-31 November, 1914-February, 1915 17 32 March-April, 1915 18 33 May-June, 1915 19 34-35 July-October, 1915 20 36-37 November, 1915-February, 1916 21 38-39 March-June, 1916 22 40-41 July-October, 1916 23 42-43 November, 1916-February, 1917 24 44 March-April, 1917 25 45 May-June, 1917 26 46 July-August, 1917 27 47 September-October, 1917 28 48 November-December, 1917 29 49-50 Jan. 1-Mar. 15, 1918 30 51-53 Mar. 16-Apr. 30, 1918 31 56-59 June 1-Aug. 15, 1918 32 60-64 Aug. 16-0ct. 31, 1918 33 65-69 Nov. 1', 1918-Jan. 15, 1919 34 70-73 Jan. 16-Mar. 31, 1919 35 74-77 April-May, 1919 36 78-79 June-July, 1919 37 80-81 August-September, 1919 38 82-83 October-November, 1919 39 84-85 December, 1919-January, 1920 40 86-87 February-March, 1920 41 88-89 April-May, 1920 42 90 June, 1920 43 91 July, 1920 44 92 August, 1920 45 93 September, 1920 46 94 October, 1920 47 95-96 November, 1920 48 97-98 December, 1920 49 99-100 Jan.
    [Show full text]
  • University Archives Inventory
    University Archives Inventory Record Group Number: UR001.03 Title: Burney Lynch Parkinson Presidential Records Date: 1926-1969 Bulk Date: 1932-1952 Extent: 42 boxes Creator: Burney Lynch Parkinson Administrative/Biographical Notes: Burney Lynch Parkinson (1887-1972) was an educator from Lincoln, Tennessee. He received his B.S. from Erskine College in 1909, and rose up the administrative ranks from English teacher in Laurens, South Carolina public schools. He received his M.A. from Peabody College in 1920, and Ph.D. from Peabody in 1926, after which he became president of Presbyterian College in Clinton, SC in 1927. He was employed as Director of Teacher Training, Certification, and Elementary Education at the Alabama Dept. of Education just before coming to MSCW to become president in 1932. In December 1932, the university was re-accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools, ending the crisis brought on the purge of faculty under Governor Theodore Bilbo, but appropriations to the university were cut by 54 percent, and faculty and staff were reduced by 33 percent, as enrollment had declined from 1410 in 1929 to 804 in 1932. Parkinson authorized a study of MSCW by Peabody college, ultimately pursuing its recommendations to focus on liberal arts at the cost of its traditional role in industrial, vocational, and technical education. Building projects were kept to a minimum during the Parkinson years. Old Main was restored and named for Mary Calloway in 1938. Franklin Hall was converted to a dorm, and the Whitfield Gymnasium into a student center with the Golden Goose Tearoom inside. Parkinson Hall was constructed in 1951 and named for Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Business Conditions: September 30, 1933, Volume 16, Number 10
    Business Conditions Seventh Reserve FEDERAL IOWA District Eugene M. Stevens, Chairman of the Board and George A. Prugh, Asst. Federal Reserve Agent Federal Reserve Agent Harris G. Pett, Manager Clifford S. Young, Asst. Federal Reserve Agent Division of Research and Statistics MONTHLY REVIEW PUBLISHED BY THE Volume 16, No. 10 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF CHICAGO September 30, 1933 General Summary were counter to trend for August, and in drugs the gain was greater than average, although groceries and shoes NLY a few industries of the Seventh district experi­ recorded a less than seasonal increase, and dry goods de­ O enced a decline in activity during August, and almost clined in volume, following counter-to-seasonal expansion without exception business exceeded markedly the volume in July. Department store trade in August experienced of the same month last year. Merchandising groups a greater percentage gain over a month previous than showed an especially favorable trend for August, with the shown in the same month of any of the preceding ten majority of gains being greater than usual for the month years. The increase over July in the retail shoe trade was or counter to seasonal trend. contrary to seasonal trend, and that in the furniture trade Among the major manufacturing industries to record was larger than usual for August. Aggregate sales of re­ lessened activity in August were iron and steel, and build­ porting chains totaled heavier in August than a month ing construction. Total output of automobiles slightly ex­ earlier. Although wholesale distribution of automobiles ceeded that of July; malleable casting, stove, and furni­ showed some decline, sales at retail were moderately larger.
    [Show full text]
  • Scrapbook Inventory
    E COLLECTION, H. L. MENCKEN COLLECTION, ENOCH PRATT FREE LIBRARY Scrapbooks of Clipping Service Start and End Dates for Each Volume Volume 1 [sealed, must be consulted on microfilm] Volume 2 [sealed, must be consulted on microfilm] Volume 3 August 1919-November 1920 Volume 4 December 1920-November 1921 Volume 5 December 1921-June-1922 Volume 6 May 1922-January 1923 Volume 7 January 1923-August 1923 Volume 8 August 1923-February 1924 Volume 9 March 1924-November 1924 Volume 10 November 1924-April 1925 Volume 11 April 1925-September 1925 Volume 12 September 1925-December 1925 Volume 13 December 1925-February 1926 Volume 14 February 1926-September 1926 Volume 15 1926 various dates Volume 16 July 1926-October 1926 Volume 17 October 1926-December 1926 Volume 18 December 1926-February 1927 Volume 19 February 1927-March 1927 Volume 20 April 1927-June 1927 Volume 21 June 1927-August 1927 Volume 22 September 1927-October 1927 Volume 23 October 1927-November 1927 Volume 24 November 1927-February 1928 Volume 25 February 1928-April 1928 Volume 26 May 1928-July 1928 Volume 27 July 1928-December 1928 Volume 28 January 1929-April 1929 Volume 29 May 1929-November 1929 Volume 30 November 1929-February 1930 Volume 31 March 1930-April 1930 Volume 32 May 1930-August 1930 Volume 33 August 1930-August 1930. Volume 34 August 1930-August 1930 Volume 35 August 1930-August 1930 Volume 36 August 1930-August 1930 Volume 37 August 1930-September 1930 Volume 38 August 1930-September 1930 Volume 39 August 1930-September 1930 Volume 40 September 1930-October 1930 Volume
    [Show full text]
  • 244 MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW JULY 1934 UPPER-AIR WINDS OVER NORTHERN ALASKA DURING the INTERNATIONAL POLAR YEAR, AUGUST 1932-AUGUST 1933, INCLUSIVE by LOYDA
    244 MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW JULY 1934 UPPER-AIR WINDS OVER NORTHERN ALASKA DURING THE INTERNATIONAL POLAR YEAR, AUGUST 1932-AUGUST 1933, INCLUSIVE By LOYDA. STEVENS Weather Bureau, Washington, D.C., July 19341 The United States Weather Bureau has prepared some three stations, Point Barrow, Nonie, and Fairbanks; being 25,000 pilot-balloon suinmary forms for the International given for all standard levels by months and for the year. Polar Year Commission, on which are entered the data The monthly resultants are shown for levels up to G kilo- from all Weather Bureau pilot-balloon stations, including meters insofar as data are available, mid the annual 1 in Puerto Rico rind 4 in AlRSkft for the period, August values are given for the two additional levels of '7 and 8 1932 to August 1933, inclusive. Since the International kilometers. In sonie cases the number of observations - 6000 ARROWS FLY 5ooo WITH THE- WIND LENGTHS OF 4000 ARROWS 3000 REPRESENT 2000 VELOCITIES IN METERS PER 1500 SECOND- 1000 VELOCITY SCALE 500 ouS"R (M3.L) FIGURE1.-Resultant winds at Fairbanks, Nome. and Point Barrow, Alaska Coniniission was espec,ially interested in observations in for an individurtl month was sinall, causing apparent and near the polnr re,,oions, the Wea.ther Bureau estnh- inconsistencies and irregularities, but in FenFral the air lishe.d, and maintained for the greater portion of the movement over this areti is believed to be inhcated quite Po1a.r Year, a spe.cia1station tit Point Barrow, the north- accurately in figures 1 and 3 011 which the resultants ernmost point of land in Alnska,; latitude 71'23' X., have been drawn.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Reserve Bulletin August 1932
    FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN AUGUST, 1932 ISSUED BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD AT WASHINGTON Recent Banking Legislation Final Act of the Lausanne Conference Earnings and Expenses of Federal Reserve Banks UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1932 Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD Ex officio members: EUGENE MEYER, Governor. OGDEN L. MILLS, CHARLES S. HAMLIN. Secretary of the Treasury, Chairman. ADOLPH C. MILLER. J. W. POLE, GEORGE R. JAMES. Comptroller of the Currency. WAYLAND W. MAGEE. FLOYD R. HARRISON, Assistant to the Governor. LEO H. PAULGER, Chief, Division of Examinations. CHESTER MORRILL, Secretary. E. A. GOLDENWEISER, Director, Division of Research and Statistics. E. M. MCCLELLAND, Assistant Secretary. CARL E. PARRY, Assistant Director, Division of Research J. C. NOELL, Assistant Secretary and Fiscal Agent. and Statistics. WALTER WYATT, General Counsel. E. L. SMEAD, Chief, Division of Bank Operations. FEDERAL ADVISORY COUNCIL District No. 1 (BOSTON) THOMAS M. STEELE. District No. 2 (NEW YORK)._. ROBERT H. TREMAN. District No. 3 (PHILADELPHIA) HOWARD A. LOEB. District No. 4 (CLEVELAND) J. A. HOUSE. District No. 5 (RICHMOND) HOWARD BRUCE. District No. 6 (ATLANTA) JOHN K. OTTLEY. District No. 7 (CHICAGO) , MELVIN A. TRAYLOR, Vice President. District No. 8 (ST. LOUIS) WALTER W. SMITH, President. District No. 9 (MINNEAPOLIS)^ THEODORE WOLD. District No. 10 (KANSAS CITY) WALTER S. MCLUCAS. District No. 11 (DALLAS) J. H. FROST. District No. 12 (SAN FRANCISCO) HENRY M. ROBINSON. WALTER LICHTENSTEIN, Secretary u Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis OFFICERS OF FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS Federal Reserve Bank of— Chairman Governor Deputy governor Cashier Boston Frederie H.
    [Show full text]
  • A Lesson from the Great Depression That the Fed Might Have Learned
    A Lesson from the Great Depression that the Fed Might have Learned: A Comparison of the 1932 Open Market Purchases with Quantitative Easing Michael Bordo1 Department of Economics, Rutgers University, Hoover Institute (Stanford University) and NBER Arunima Sinha2 (Department of Economics, Fordham University) September 2015 . 1 Email: [email protected]. Contact: New Jersey Hall, 75 Hamilton Street, New Brunswick, NJ 08901. 2 Email: [email protected]. Contact: 113 W 60th street, Lowenstein building Rm 924, New York, NY 10024. We are grateful to Vasco Cúrdia for providing us access to his codes, and discussing our paper. Comments from audiences at the conferences on Expectations in Dynamic Macroeconomic Models, the Econometric Society World Congress (Montreal) and European Economic Association (Mannheim) meetings are gratefully acknowledged. 1 Abstract We examine the first QE program through the lens of an open-market operation under- taken by the Federal Reserve in 1932, at the height of the Great Depression. This program entailed large purchases of medium- and long-term securities over a four-month period. There were no prior announcements about the size or composition of the operation, how long it would be put in place, and the program ended abruptly. Using a dataset with weekly-level Treasury holdings of the Federal Reserve in 1932, and the corresponding yields, we first conduct an event study analysis. This indicates that the 1932 program significantly low- ered medium- and long-term Treasury yields. We then use a segmented markets model to analyze the channel through which the open-market purchases affected the economy. Quar- terly data from 1920-32 is used to estimate the model with Bayesian methods, employing the methodology of Chen, Cúrdia and Ferrero (2012).
    [Show full text]
  • Two Bells, Brown Is Giving Page 9, Column 1, Contained These Instructions to Words: Mr
    Supposin I Supposin' fish don't bite at first— What are you goin' to do? Throw down your pole, and chuck your bait— And say your fishing's through? You bet you ain't—you're goin' to fish 'N fish 'n fish, 'n wait 'N use up all your bait. Suppose success don't come at first— What are you goin' to do? Throw up the sponge 'n kick yourself 'N growl and fret and stew? You bet you ain't—you're goin' to fish, You'll bait 'n bait ag'in, Until success jest grabs your hook, For grit is sure to win. —Exchange . ..,., ,..i ....,, •••••••,.,.-'111,I.tiltli ill r1- ■ .,-.,..... 111 . I l i , ,„•,,,,,,,,,,,..,,,..,,,,,,,,,..,,,,,....,„.- 11411 . . 9' '-'''' . ,••'F•.,. P. !.. 14. 4."... ..(' ... 6• .. \:`:• .. • '''....();:; ' . • — )..... .2•.L.. ......•5 . •,.. ..... ........... , ;r714 , _ • 1.., t- ..-,, - -,....- ,,, • •..,:, •,..--. , vtv....„,...._.,,—, .. ...... . .. - -•••••-••••••• .....z004.,......,• •. ■ ■ •••m,..,,,,,,t•••• • •• ,• ..*,... ••••, • _. _ _ — . • =N.• - . •„... - • - • ', .. ,....,...,.... v....A..1,00ml ., i ,,.,,, ' 4.,; . • '. v 4 , .7 •'''' : ■ • ' / ikairl/MVAVr ,••• " 4111.1111111111111111.0$ —.............. - . .„... 44Vitil ••-•----,,,--- ' ..,,,v...,• ••• .. ...." 1',':',-:''.V•e•Ms'eb•A''...'•*:' ''.\-,`•:" . . Z:ct.' ' ' . '; • - • : ' - ' . •-•.l.' . ' ' - . .. .. ' . • •••-•••••,-,• •I*1 Vol. XIII SEPTEMBER 1932 No. 9 pi-Nwl pa)" a74- yell) pa" ye:MI pfygpap,-4. 0.2)4W3li, tIr I 4, Loyalty UCH has been said and written, both in the daily press and on the moving picture screen, about the gangster's code—his loyalty to his chief, to his gang, even unto death. A halo, of a sort, has there- fore been placed about his head. There is no doubt that Loyalty is one of the most important human ele- ment factors in American business, as well as in social and private life.
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery Spring Revisions EEH Final
    Recovery Spring, Faltering Fall: March to November 1933 Item Type Article Authors Taylor, Jason E.; Neumann, Todd C. Citation Recovery Spring, Faltering Fall: March to November 1933 2016, 61:54 Explorations in Economic History DOI 10.1016/j.eeh.2016.03.003 Publisher ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE Journal Explorations in Economic History Rights © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Download date 30/09/2021 23:39:42 Item License http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ Version Final accepted manuscript Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/621213 Recovery Spring, Faltering Fall: March to November 1933 Jason E. Taylor Central Michigan University 321 Sloan Hall Mount Pleasant, MI 48859 989.774.2578 [email protected] (corresponding author) Todd C. Neumann University of Arizona 1130 E. Helen Street McClelland Hall 401 Tucson, AZ 85721 520.621.3790 [email protected] Keywords: Recovery, Depression, Inflation, Devaluation, Expectations Abstract Recovery from the Great Depression began in March 1933, simultaneous to Franklin Roosevelt’s inauguration. However, the pace of that recovery between that date and the Second World War was extremely uneven with some dramatic starts and stops. Between March and July 1933, manufacturing production rose 78 percent, production of durable goods was up 199 percent, total industrial production rose 57 percent, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 71 percent. Then the economy contracted sharply again beginning in August 1933—the July 1933 level of industrial production was not reached again until August 1935. This paper addresses two questions. What factors were responsible for bringing about the sharp recovery in the spring of 1933 and what factors brought this short-lived economic surge to an end? Recovery Spring, Faltering Fall: March to November 1933 Recovery from the Great Depression began in March 1933, simultaneous to Franklin Roosevelt’s inauguration.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Libraries, July-August 1932
    San Jose State University SJSU ScholarWorks Special Libraries, 1932 Special Libraries, 1930s 7-1-1932 Special Libraries, July-August 1932 Special Libraries Association Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/sla_sl_1932 Part of the Cataloging and Metadata Commons, Collection Development and Management Commons, Information Literacy Commons, and the Scholarly Communication Commons Recommended Citation Special Libraries Association, "Special Libraries, July-August 1932" (1932). Special Libraries, 1932. 6. https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/sla_sl_1932/6 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Special Libraries, 1930s at SJSU ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Special Libraries, 1932 by an authorized administrator of SJSU ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SPECIAL LIBRARIES "Putting Knowledge to Work" PROCEEDINGS of the TWENf Y-FOURTH ANNUAL CONFERENCE At Lake Placid, June 13-17,1932 ,t WORLD CHANGES By James G. McDonald SOME TRENDS IN SOCIAL AND E~ONOMICTH~NKING By Roderic Qlrendam THEME Changing Times and the Greater Need for Fact Finding Volume 23 JULY-AUGUST, 1932 Number 6 SPECIAL LIBRARIES ASSOCIATION Official Magazine Spacial ~ibkrirr Edilo* FLORENCE BRADLEY LILrarian. Metro htan Llfe lnsurnnce Compnny %w York CIty Assoclolc Edlla for this Proceedinga Number MARTHA FOULK H. L. Doherty and Company New York Clty A full Bdltorial Board is to be announced in the Septtmber.ll~ue Advnlisinp Monoper M. DOROTHY HOWARD OFFICERSFOR 1931-1939 a PrrsMcnl Dirccfws ALTA R. CLAFLIN ANGUS FLETCHER, C.B.E. Libndan. Federal Kcsenre Bank Llbrarlan Cleveland, Ohlo Britlah Library of Information New York. N. Y. JOSEPH CONFORTI ELEANOR S.
    [Show full text]
  • Orange Olsen Diaries
    United States Department of Agriculture Orange Olsen Diaries, Forest Service Intermountain Region 1931-1933 JANUARY 2012 Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 2 November 1931 .............................................................................................................................. 4 December 1931 ............................................................................................................................... 6 August 1932 .................................................................................................................................... 7 September 1932 .............................................................................................................................. 9 October 1932 ................................................................................................................................ 12 November 1932 ............................................................................................................................ 16 December 1932 ............................................................................................................................. 18 March 1933 ................................................................................................................................... 19 April 1933 .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Friendly Endeavor, August 1932
    Digital Commons @ George Fox University Northwest Yearly Meeting of Friends Church Friendly Endeavor (Quakers) 8-1932 Friendly Endeavor, August 1932 George Fox University Archives Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/nwym_endeavor Recommended Citation George Fox University Archives, "Friendly Endeavor, August 1932" (1932). Friendly Endeavor. 115. https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/nwym_endeavor/115 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Northwest Yearly Meeting of Friends Church (Quakers) at Digital Commons @ George Fox University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Friendly Endeavor by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ George Fox University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Friendly Endeavor Volume 11, Number 8. PORTLAND, OREGON August, 1932. H I - L I G H T S F R O M P A Y E T T E L A K E S His standards, so that we might be com The conference may be characterized CONFERENCE plete in Him. by a spirit of good fellowship, of spir Walter Lee spoke Thursday morning itual enthusiasm and entire consecration The fifth annual Idaho Friends Chris from 1. Corinthians 16:9 and 16. A to the will of God. The Idaho folk are tian Endeavor Conference was held at message of encouragement was brought united in their belief that this has been to us based on the thought that a man's the best conference yet. Payette Lakes July 11-17. The entire week was so charged %vith activity that life consisteth not in the abundance of no doubt a full-page write up could things which he possesseth.
    [Show full text]