Federal Reserve Bulletin August 1932
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Federal Reserve Bulletin February 1932
FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN FEBRUARY, 1932 ISSUED BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD AT WASHINGTON Recent Banh ng Developments Reconstruction Finance Corporation Act UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON: 1932 Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD Ex officio members: EUGENE MEYER, Governor. A. W. MELLON, , Vice Governor. Secretary of the Treasury, Chairman. CHARLES S. HAMLIN. J. W. POLE, ADOLPH C. MILLER. Comptroller of the Currency. GEORGE R. JAMES. WAYLAND W. MAGEE. FLOYD R. HARRISON, Assistant to the Governor. LEO H. PAULGER, Chief, Division of Examinations. CHESTER MORRILL, Secretary. E. A. GOLDENWEISER, Director, Division of Research E. M. MCCLELLAND, Assistant Secretary. and Statistics. J. C. NOELL, Assistant Secretary. CARL E. PARRY, Assistant Director, Division of Research WALTER WYATT, General Counsel. and Statistics. W. M. IMLAY, Fiscal Agent. E. L. SMEAD, Chief, Division of Bank Operations. FEDERAL ADVISORY COUNCIL District No. 1 (BOSTON) THOMAS M. STEELE. District No. 2 (NEW YORK) ROBERT H. TREMAN. District No. 3 (PHILADELPHIA) HOWARD A. LOEB. District No. 4 (CLEVELAND) J. A. HOUSE. District No. 5 (RICHMOND) HOWARD BRUCE. District No. 6 (ATLANTA) JOHN K. OTTLEY. District No. 7 (CHICAGO) MELVIN A. TRAYLOR, Vice President. District No. 8 (ST. LOUIS) WALTER W. SMITH, President. District No. 9 (MINNEAPOLIS) THEODORE WOLD. District No. 10 (KANSAS CITY) WALTER S. MCLUCAS. District No. 11 (DALLAS) J. H. FROST. District No. 12 (SAN FRANCISCO) HENRY M. ROBINSON. WALTER LICHTENSTEIN, Secretary. n Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis OFFICERS OF FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS Federal Reserve Bank Chairman Governor Deputy governor Cashier of— W. -
Radio and the Rise of the Nazis in Prewar Germany
Radio and the Rise of the Nazis in Prewar Germany Maja Adena, Ruben Enikolopov, Maria Petrova, Veronica Santarosa, and Ekaterina Zhuravskaya* May 10, 2014 How far can the media protect or undermine democratic institutions in unconsolidated democracies, and how persuasive can they be in ensuring public support for dictator’s policies? We study this question in the context of Germany between 1929 and 1939. Radio slowed down the growth of political support for the Nazis, when Weimar government introduced pro-government political news in 1929, denying access to the radio for the Nazis up till January 1933. This effect was reversed in 5 weeks after the transfer of control over the radio to the Nazis following Hitler’s appointment as chancellor. After full consolidation of power, radio propaganda helped the Nazis to enroll new party members and encouraged denunciations of Jews and other open expressions of anti-Semitism. The effect of Nazi radio propaganda varied depending on the listeners’ predispositions toward the message. Nazi radio was most effective in places where anti-Semitism was historically high and had a negative effect on the support for Nazi messages in places with historically low anti-Semitism. !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! * Maja Adena is from Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung. Ruben Enikolopov is from Barcelona Institute for Political Economy and Governance, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona GSE, and the New Economic School, Moscow. Maria Petrova is from Barcelona Institute for Political Economy and Governance, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona GSE, and the New Economic School. Veronica Santarosa is from the Law School of the University of Michigan. Ekaterina Zhuravskaya is from Paris School of Economics (EHESS) and the New Economic School. -
Records of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, 1891-1957, Record Group 85 New Orleans, Louisiana Crew Lists of Vessels Arriving at New Orleans, LA, 1910-1945
Records of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, 1891-1957, Record Group 85 New Orleans, Louisiana Crew Lists of Vessels Arriving at New Orleans, LA, 1910-1945. T939. 311 rolls. (~A complete list of rolls has been added.) Roll Volumes Dates 1 1-3 January-June, 1910 2 4-5 July-October, 1910 3 6-7 November, 1910-February, 1911 4 8-9 March-June, 1911 5 10-11 July-October, 1911 6 12-13 November, 1911-February, 1912 7 14-15 March-June, 1912 8 16-17 July-October, 1912 9 18-19 November, 1912-February, 1913 10 20-21 March-June, 1913 11 22-23 July-October, 1913 12 24-25 November, 1913-February, 1914 13 26 March-April, 1914 14 27 May-June, 1914 15 28-29 July-October, 1914 16 30-31 November, 1914-February, 1915 17 32 March-April, 1915 18 33 May-June, 1915 19 34-35 July-October, 1915 20 36-37 November, 1915-February, 1916 21 38-39 March-June, 1916 22 40-41 July-October, 1916 23 42-43 November, 1916-February, 1917 24 44 March-April, 1917 25 45 May-June, 1917 26 46 July-August, 1917 27 47 September-October, 1917 28 48 November-December, 1917 29 49-50 Jan. 1-Mar. 15, 1918 30 51-53 Mar. 16-Apr. 30, 1918 31 56-59 June 1-Aug. 15, 1918 32 60-64 Aug. 16-0ct. 31, 1918 33 65-69 Nov. 1', 1918-Jan. 15, 1919 34 70-73 Jan. 16-Mar. 31, 1919 35 74-77 April-May, 1919 36 78-79 June-July, 1919 37 80-81 August-September, 1919 38 82-83 October-November, 1919 39 84-85 December, 1919-January, 1920 40 86-87 February-March, 1920 41 88-89 April-May, 1920 42 90 June, 1920 43 91 July, 1920 44 92 August, 1920 45 93 September, 1920 46 94 October, 1920 47 95-96 November, 1920 48 97-98 December, 1920 49 99-100 Jan. -
Discrimination and Law in Nazi Germany
Cohen Center for Holocaust and Genocide Studies Name:_______________________________ at Keene State College __________________________________________________________________________________________________ “To Remember…and to Teach.” www.keene.edu/cchgs Student Outline: Destroying Democracy From Within (1933-1938) 1. In the November 1932 elections the Nazis received _______ (%) of the vote. 2. Hitler was named Chancellor of a right-wing coalition government on _________________ _____, __________. 3. Hitler’s greatest fear is that he could be dismissed by President ____________________________. 4. Hitler’s greatest unifier of the many conservatives was fear of the _____________. 5. The Reichstag Fire Decree of February 1933 allowed Hitler to use article _______ to suspend the Reichstag and suspend ________________ ____________ for all Germans. 6. In March 5, 1933 election, the Nazi Party had _________ % of the vote. 7. Concentration camps (KL) emerged from below as camps for “__________________ ________________” prisoners. 8. On March 24, 1933, the _______________ Act gave Hitler power to rule as dictator during the declared “state of emergency.” It was the __________________ Center Party that swayed the vote in Hitler’s favor. 9. Franz Schlegelberger became the State Secretary in the German Ministry of ___________________. He believed that the courts role was to maintain ________________ __________________. He based his rulings on the principle of the ____________________ ___________________ order. He endorsed the Enabling Act because the government, in his view, could act with _______________, ________________, and _____________________. 10. One week after the failed April 1, 1933 Boycott, the Nazis passed the “Law for the Restoration of the Professional _________________ ______________________. The April 11 supplement attempted to legally define “non-Aryan” as someone with a non-Aryan ____________________ or ________________________. -
Austerity and the Rise of the Nazi Party Gregori Galofré-Vilà, Christopher M
Austerity and the Rise of the Nazi party Gregori Galofré-Vilà, Christopher M. Meissner, Martin McKee, and David Stuckler NBER Working Paper No. 24106 December 2017, Revised in September 2020 JEL No. E6,N1,N14,N44 ABSTRACT We study the link between fiscal austerity and Nazi electoral success. Voting data from a thousand districts and a hundred cities for four elections between 1930 and 1933 shows that areas more affected by austerity (spending cuts and tax increases) had relatively higher vote shares for the Nazi party. We also find that the localities with relatively high austerity experienced relatively high suffering (measured by mortality rates) and these areas’ electorates were more likely to vote for the Nazi party. Our findings are robust to a range of specifications including an instrumental variable strategy and a border-pair policy discontinuity design. Gregori Galofré-Vilà Martin McKee Department of Sociology Department of Health Services Research University of Oxford and Policy Manor Road Building London School of Hygiene Oxford OX1 3UQ & Tropical Medicine United Kingdom 15-17 Tavistock Place [email protected] London WC1H 9SH United Kingdom Christopher M. Meissner [email protected] Department of Economics University of California, Davis David Stuckler One Shields Avenue Università Bocconi Davis, CA 95616 Carlo F. Dondena Centre for Research on and NBER Social Dynamics and Public Policy (Dondena) [email protected] Milan, Italy [email protected] Austerity and the Rise of the Nazi party Gregori Galofr´e-Vil`a Christopher M. Meissner Martin McKee David Stuckler Abstract: We study the link between fiscal austerity and Nazi electoral success. -
Some Rare Or Unusual Birds Banded on Cape
Bird-Banding October Ba•,d-Number Date Banded Returning Dates B80250 February 9, 1929 January 31, 1931 B80250 February 9, 1929 January 24, 1932 (Return-2) C14873 December 22, 1929 January 18, 1931 C14873 December 22, 1929 January 8, 1932 (Return-2) C14891 February 14, 1930 January 8, 1931 c14591 February 14, 1930 January 12, 1932 (Return-2) C98288 January 13, 1931 March 16, 1932 ('98298 January 20, 1931 March 17, 1932 C98300 January 20, 1931 March 20, 1932 (;98309 January 24, 1931 March 14, 1932 (;98315 January 31, 1931 March 17, 1932 C98317 February 2, 1931 •Iarch 13, 1932 In the above list it will be noted that there was only one bird, B80250, that I bandedduring the winter of 1928-29,and two, C14873 and C14891, of those bandedby me during the winter of 1929-30; also, that B80250 was not retaken during the winter of 1929-30. Although the winter of 1931-32 •vas consideredan open one, the number of Snow Buntings banded by me was as large as during any previouswinter. The following table shows the number of Snow Bun,tings banded by months during the sea- sons of 1928-29 to 1931-32. In addition, I have had twenty-three returns. No. of Birds Dec. Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Banded Winter of 1928-29 20 38 16 1 81 \Vinter of 1929-30 4 9 13 26 Winter of 1930-31 35 10 12 57 Win,ter of 1931-32 1 14 61 5 81 Totals 4 71 75 89 5 1 245 OSC:XRMcKzNL•Y BRYE•S, R. -
University Archives Inventory
University Archives Inventory Record Group Number: UR001.03 Title: Burney Lynch Parkinson Presidential Records Date: 1926-1969 Bulk Date: 1932-1952 Extent: 42 boxes Creator: Burney Lynch Parkinson Administrative/Biographical Notes: Burney Lynch Parkinson (1887-1972) was an educator from Lincoln, Tennessee. He received his B.S. from Erskine College in 1909, and rose up the administrative ranks from English teacher in Laurens, South Carolina public schools. He received his M.A. from Peabody College in 1920, and Ph.D. from Peabody in 1926, after which he became president of Presbyterian College in Clinton, SC in 1927. He was employed as Director of Teacher Training, Certification, and Elementary Education at the Alabama Dept. of Education just before coming to MSCW to become president in 1932. In December 1932, the university was re-accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools, ending the crisis brought on the purge of faculty under Governor Theodore Bilbo, but appropriations to the university were cut by 54 percent, and faculty and staff were reduced by 33 percent, as enrollment had declined from 1410 in 1929 to 804 in 1932. Parkinson authorized a study of MSCW by Peabody college, ultimately pursuing its recommendations to focus on liberal arts at the cost of its traditional role in industrial, vocational, and technical education. Building projects were kept to a minimum during the Parkinson years. Old Main was restored and named for Mary Calloway in 1938. Franklin Hall was converted to a dorm, and the Whitfield Gymnasium into a student center with the Golden Goose Tearoom inside. Parkinson Hall was constructed in 1951 and named for Dr. -
N. A. C. A. Buyi,1M*
�OGv N. A. C. A. B u y i , 1 M * T h i s b u l l e t i n is p u b li s h e d semi- monthly t h e F 1 0 E O F T H E Q by IECRETARY N a t i o n a l Association of Cos t Accountants, 1790 B r o a d w a y , N e w Yo r k 90, Broadway N e w Y o r k In�three�sections—�Section�III l919'sy VOL. XIII, NO. 78 � V * MAY 15.1932 i CURRENT COST LITER 'c"CPKLr'��]1 R R y Our Cost Literature Bulletins, which are issued o the fifteenth of each month, contai n all the avai labl e re fe re nces t o cost art i cl e s an ost mat e ri al . published for the most part during the past month. The majority of these- references are obtained from the Engineering Index Service. They are classified according to industries and topics. It is to be hoped that this arrangement will make the references more useful to our members, and facilitate preserving them for future reference. Addresses of magazines referred to in this issue will be found on pages 1315 -16. Arrangements l:ave been made with The Engineering Societies Library whereby that library will usually supply photostatic copies (white printing on black back- ground) of any of the articles listed herein. The price of each print, up to 11 by 14 inches in size, is 25 cents plus postage. -
1932 Congressional Recor~H.Ouse
1932 CONGRESSIONAL RECOR~H.OUSE 1.3387 There being no objection, the articles were referred to the NOMINATIONS Committee on Foreign Relations and ordered to be printed Executive twminatiom received. by t1te Senate June 18 in the RECORD, as follows: <legislative day of June 15), 1932 [From Washington Times of June 18, 1932} · PROMOTIONS IN THE REGULAR ARMY FRENCH PRAISE HERRIOT STAND AT LAUSANNE-<>PPOSITION TO CANCEL To be colonel LATION OF GERMAN DEBT HELD VITAL ATTITUDE Lieut. Col. Otis Robert Cole, Infantry, from June 8, 1932. PARIS, June 18.-Premier Herriot, returntng from Lausanne to-day to preside over a session of the French cabinet, finds To be lieutenant colonel almost universal approval here for the stand he took at the repa rations conference yesterday against 1mmediate cancellation of MaJ. Emile Victor Cutrer, Infantry, from June 8, 1932. Germany's war-debt obligations. To be major He will return to Lausanne Monday for resumption of the dis cussions with representatives of Great Britain, Italy, Belgium, Capt. Henry John Schroeder; Signal Corps, from June Germany. ·and Japan, carrying the complete confidence of his min 8, 1932. isters and the majority of the chamber of deputies. To be captain It was Herriot's first encounter with spokesmen for the other great powers. Even his opponents of the extreme right conceded First Lieut. John Augustus Barksdale, Quartermaster he had acquitted himself well in upholding the French thesis that Corps, from June 8, 1932. complete cancellation of German reparation payments at this time, without a corresponding concession on the part of the United To be first lieutenant States, would shortly put Germany in economic leadership of the Second Lieut. -
Of the League.) C.339.M.206.1932. Geneva,April 5,1932. LEAGUE of MATIONS. NUMERICAL LIST of DOCUMENTS DISTRIBUTED to MEMBERS OF
(Distributed, to Members C.339.M.206.1932. of the League.) Geneva,April 5,1932. LEAGUE OF MATIONS. NUMERICAL LIST OF DOCUMENTS DISTRIBUTED TO MEMBERS OF THE LEAGUE < No. 3 (March 1932) Official Number Sub .ject C,611(1).M,237 (1).1930.IX © Convention on Financial assistance.- Text. C.654.M.266.1931.IX,Annex Position of armaments in the various countries.-Annex to communication from Czechoslovakia. C.983(1)(a),M.538(1)(a) .1931 Council, League (66th Session).- Agenda for meeting of April 12,1932. @ Certified, true copy, distributed with C.L.5, 5(a) and 5(b).1932.IX. ,53 (a .M,35(a) .1932.XI Conyention for limiting manufacture an ci regulating distribution of narcotic drugs.- Text. ;9(b).M.3ü(b) .1932.XI @ Protocol of signature of the Convention for limiting manufacture and regulating distribution of narcotic drugs.- Text. -3.M.38.1932. II. A. Taxation of foreign and national enter prises in certain countries.-General survey. §35,M.47 .1932.VIII .Addendum Publicity of civil aviation.-Addendum to study concerning the present situation and collection of provisions in force. ■216.M.112.1932. IX,Erra turn Position of armaments in the various countries.- Erratum to communication from Turkey. .£21.M. 116,1932. IX Communication from the Greek Government SO.M.167.1932.VII Report of Sub-Committee of Economic Experts to Commission of Enquiry for European Unjon.- Observations of Danzig and letter from Polish Government. |>37(l) .M,174(1) .1932.VII Communication from China(February 29,193 »238.M, 175 .1932 .VII Communication from Japan (March 1 ,1932). -
Lesson 8: Handout 1 Timeline: Hitler’S Rise to Power
Lesson 8: Handout 1 Timeline: Hitler’s rise to power 1. 1919 — Weimar Constitution is adopted. The constitution creates separate executive, judicial, and legislative branches of government so that one group or person cannot hold all of the power. It also includes articles protecting civil liberties (freedoms) such as freedom of speech, freedom of assembly (freedom to meet in public), and freedom of religion. The constitution also protects privacy so that individuals cannot be searched without the court’s permission. 2. 1919 — The constitution includes Article 48. This article suspends the constitution in times of emergency, allowing the president to make rules without the consent of the parliament and to suspend (put on hold) civil rights, like freedom of speech, in order to protect public safety. Many people thought this article was a good idea because there were so many political parties in Germany that sometimes it was difficult for them to agree enough to pass any laws. At times of crisis, like the inflation Germany suffered in 1923 or the depression in 1929, it was important for government to respond quickly and not be held from action by politicians who can not agree. Thus, many Germans thought it would be wise to have a clause in the constitution that would allow the president to take over and make quick decisions in times of emergency. 3. July 1932 — The Nazi Party wins 37% of the votes. For the first time, the Nazis are the largest and most powerful political party in Germany. Still, over half of the German citi - zens do not vote for the Nazis and they still do not have enough seats in the Reichstag (parliament) to be able to pass laws without getting additional votes from representa - tives from other political parties. -
Elections in the Weimar Republic the Elections to the Constituent National
HISTORICAL EXHIBITION PRESENTED BY THE GERMAN BUNDESTAG ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Elections in the Weimar Republic The elections to the constituent National Assembly on 19 January 1919 were the first free and democratic national elections after the fall of the monarchy. For the first time, women had the right to vote and to stand for election. The MSPD and the Centre Party, together with the German Democratic Party, which belonged to the Liberal Left, won an absolute majority of seats in the Reichstag; these three parties formed the government known as the Weimar Coalition under the chancellorship of Philipp Scheidemann of the SPD. The left-wing Socialist USPD, on the other hand, which had campaigned for sweeping collectivisation measures and radical economic changes, derived no benefit from the unrest that had persisted since the start of the November revolution and was well beaten by the MSPD and the other mainstream parties. On 6 June 1920, the first Reichstag of the Weimar democracy was elected. The governing Weimar Coalition suffered heavy losses at the polls, losing 124 seats and thus its parliamentary majority, and had to surrender the reins of government. The slightly weakened Centre Party, whose vote was down by 2.3 percentage points, the decimated German Democratic Party, whose vote slumped by 10.3 percentage points, and the rejuvenated German People’s Party (DVP) of the Liberal Right, whose share of the vote increased by 9.5 percentage points, formed a minority government under the Centrist Konstantin Fehrenbach, a government tolerated by the severely weakened MSPD, which had seen its electoral support plummet by 16.2 percentage points.