DOCSLIB.ORG

Brownfields Redevelopment and Gentrification: a Socio-Economic Evaluation of the EPA Brownfields Pilot Program Benjamin Harrison Fisher Iowa State University

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Brownfields Redevelopment and Gentrification: a Socio-Economic Evaluation of the EPA Brownfields Pilot Program Benjamin Harrison Fisher Iowa State University Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Graduate Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2011 Brownfields redevelopment and gentrification: A socio-economic evaluation of the EPA Brownfields Pilot Program Benjamin Harrison Fisher Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd Part of the Urban, Community and Regional Planning Commons Recommended Citation Fisher, Benjamin Harrison, "Brownfields redevelopment and gentrification: A socio-economic evaluation of the EPA Brownfields Pilot Program" (2011). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 12021. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/12021 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Brownfields redevelopment and gentrification: A socio-economic evaluation of the EPA Brownfields Pilot Program by Benjamin Harrison Fisher A thesis submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF COMMUNITY AND REGIONAL PLANNING Major: Community and Regional Planning Program of Study Committee: Monica A. Haddad, Major Professor Susan Bradbury David Peters Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 2011 Copyright © Benjamin Harrison Fisher, 2011. All rights reserved. ii Table of Contents LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................................... iv LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................................. v ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ..................................................................................................................... vi ABSTRACT ......................................................................................................................................... vii CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Motivation .............................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Brownfields and the Environmental Protection Agency ........................................................ 2 1.3 The Origin of Brownfields ..................................................................................................... 4 1.4 Significance of Brownfields ................................................................................................... 6 1.5 Research Objectives and Questions ........................................................................................ 7 1.6 Thesis Outline ......................................................................................................................... 8 CHAPTER 2: THEORETICAL & CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS ............................................... 10 2.1 Theoretical Framework ........................................................................................................ 10 2.1.1 Tiebout‟s Local Public Goods Theory .......................................................................... 10 2.1.2 Smith‟s Rent-Gap Theory ............................................................................................. 12 2.2 Conceptual Framework ........................................................................................................ 13 CHAPTER 3: LITERATURE REVIEW ............................................................................................. 16 3.1 Environmental Justice .......................................................................................................... 16 3.2 Environmental Justice and Brownfields ............................................................................... 18 3.3 Gentrification ........................................................................................................................ 22 3.4 Gentrification and Brownfields ............................................................................................ 24 CHAPTER 4: RESEARCH DESIGN .................................................................................................. 28 4.1 Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Approaches .................................................................... 28 4.2 Study Area ............................................................................................................................ 29 4.3 Data Sources ......................................................................................................................... 35 4.4 Variables ............................................................................................................................... 36 4.5 Methodology ........................................................................................................................ 41 4.5.1 Spatial Procedures ........................................................................................................ 41 4.5.2 Analytical Method: Cross-Sectional Analysis .............................................................. 44 iii 4.5.3 Analytical Method: Longitudinal Analysis .................................................................. 45 CHAPTER 5: RESULTS ..................................................................................................................... 53 5.1 Cross-Sectional Study Results .............................................................................................. 53 5.1.1 Non-White population .................................................................................................. 53 5.1.2 Median Household Income ........................................................................................... 54 5.1.3 Owner Occupied Housing Units ................................................................................... 55 5.2 Longitudinal Study Results .................................................................................................. 56 5.2.1 MANCOVA Omnibus Test Results ............................................................................. 57 5.2.3 MANCOVA Univariate Test Results ........................................................................... 58 5.2.4 MANCOVA Multiple Comparison Procedure Results ................................................ 60 5.2.5 MANCOVA ex post Assumptions ............................................................................... 66 CHAPTER 6: CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................. 69 6.1 Brownfields and Environmental Justice ............................................................................... 69 6.2 Brownfields Redevelopment and Gentrification .................................................................. 70 6.3 Implications of Research ...................................................................................................... 73 6.4 Limitations of Research ........................................................................................................ 74 6.5 Future Studies ....................................................................................................................... 77 References ............................................................................................................................................ 80 Appendix A: Cross-Sectional Study Descriptive Statistics .................................................................. 85 Appendix B: Longitudinal Study Descriptive Statistics ....................................................................... 86 Appendix C: Trends Observed in Longitudinal Dependent Variables ................................................. 92 Appendix D: Histograms of Standardized Residuals ........................................................................... 97 iv LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Conceptual Framework ......................................................................................................... 15 Figure 2: Treatment and control brownfields ....................................................................................... 31 Figure 3: Three buffers used to determine spatial extent of gentrification ........................................... 35 Figure 4: Average % non-White population for 0.5 mile buffers and cities ........................................ 38 Figure 5: Average median household income for 0.5 mile buffers and cities ...................................... 38 Figure 6: Average % owner occupied housing for 0.5 mile buffers and cities..................................... 39 Figure 7: Selection of block groups for the cross-sectional study with Cedar Rapids as an example.. 42 Figure 8: Longitudinal study and selection of block groups ................................................................ 43 Figure 9: Two-sample t-test equation ................................................................................................... 45 Figure 10: Distribution of standardized residuals for housing units (1.5 mile buffer and year 2009) . 67 Figure 11: Average change in total housing units for treatment and control groups............................ 92 Figure 12: Average change in total population for
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sarah Fox, Environmental Gentrification
    9. FOX_ (DO NOT DELETE) 4/10/2019 11:45 AM ENVIRONMENTAL GENTRIFICATION SARAH FOX* Gentrification is a term often used, much maligned, and dif- ficult to define. A few general principles can nonetheless be distilled regarding the concept. First, gentrification is spur- red by rising desirability of an area for housing or commer- cial purposes. Second, this rising desirability, following ba- sic supply-and-demand principles, leads to higher property values and rents in an uncontrolled market. Third, gentrifi- cation leads to a shift in the demographics of a neighbor- hood. This shift can change not only the socioeconomic and racial composition of the area but also the community’s char- acter, as residential and commercial options begin to reflect the preferences of the new arrivals to the neighborhood. Much has been written and discussed about the nature of gentrification and its impacts on communities. Less has appeared in the legal literature focusing on one specific cat- alyst for gentrification—improvements to the environment. Environmental gentrification is a term used by social scien- tists to refer to the process by which environmental cleanups, or other improvements to environmental health, spur the cy- cle of gentrification. Where land or waterways have been con- taminated, cleanup of those resources often leads to renewed interest in the surrounding areas by developers and more af- fluent tenants and homebuyers. This is particularly the case in urban areas where the quantity of usable land is limited. In such areas, environmental contamination may have long contributed to depressing property values below what the market would otherwise support; removal of that contamina- * Assistant Professor of Law, Northern Illinois University College of Law.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Renewal Plan City of Manitou Springs, Colorado
    Manitou Springs East Corridor Urban Renewal Plan City of Manitou Springs, Colorado November 2006 Prepared for: Manitou Springs City Council G:\East Manitou Springs UR Plan1 revised .doc 1 Manitou Springs East Corridor Urban Renewal Plan City of Manitou Springs, Colorado November 2006 Table of Contents Page Section 1.0: Preface and Background 3 Section 2.0: Qualifying Conditions 7 Section 3.0: Relationship to Comprehensive Plan 9 Section 4.0: Land Use Plan and Plan Objectives 10 Section 5.0: Project Implementation 14 Section 6.0: Project Financing 17 Section 7.0: Changes & Minor Variations from Adopted Plan 20 Section 8.0: Severability 21 Attachments Pending Attachment 1: Manitou Springs East Corridor Conditions Survey Findings Attachment 2: El Paso County Financial Impact Report G:\East Manitou Springs UR Plan1 revised .doc 2 MANITOU SPRINGS EAST CORRIDOR URBAN RENEWAL PLAN City of Manitou Springs, Colorado November 2006 Prepared for: Manitou Springs City Council 1.0 Preface and Background 1.1 Preface This East Manitou Springs Urban Renewal Plan (the “Plan” or the “Urban Renewal Plan”) has been prepared for the Manitou Springs City Council. It will be carried out by the Manitou Springs Urban Renewal Authority, (the “Authority”) pursuant to the provisions of the Urban Renewal Law of the State of Colorado, Part 1 of Article 25 of Title 31, Colorado Revised Statutes, 1973, as amended (the “Act”). The administration of this project and the enforcement of this Plan, including the preparation and execution of any documents implementing it, shall be performed by the Authority. 1.2 Description of Urban Renewal Area According to the Act, the jurisdictional boundaries of the Authority are the same as the boundaries of the municipality.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Green Space, Public Health, and Environmental Justice: the Challenge of Making Cities 'Just Green Enough'
    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Previously Published Works Title Urban green space, public health, and environmental justice: The challenge of making cities 'just green enough' Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8pf8s47q Authors Wolch, JR Byrne, J Newell, JP Publication Date 2014 DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.017 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Landscape and Urban Planning 125 (2014) 234–244 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Landscape and Urban Planning j ournal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/landurbplan Research Paper Urban green space, public health, and environmental justice: The challenge of making cities ‘just green enough’ a,∗ b c Jennifer R. Wolch , Jason Byrne , Joshua P. Newell a University of California, Berkeley, 230 Wurster Hall #1820, Berkeley, CA 94720-1820, USA b School of Environment, Griffith University, Australia c School of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Michigan, USA h i g h l i g h t s • Urban green space promotes physical activity and public health. • Many US minority communities lack green space access, an environmental injustice. • US and Chinese cities have developed innovative ways to create new green space. • Urban greening can, however, create paradoxical effects such as gentrification. • Urban green space projects need more integrative sustainability policies to protect communities. a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: Urban green space, such as parks, forests, green roofs, streams, and community gardens, provides crit- Available online 2 March 2014 ical ecosystem services. Green space also promotes physical activity, psychological well-being, and the general public health of urban residents.
    [Show full text]
  • 6.717 Class Specification
    STATE OF NEVADA Department of Administration Division of Human Resource Management CLASS SPECIFICATION TITLE GRADE EEO-4 CODE PARK AND RECREATION PROGRAM MANAGER 37 B 6.717 Under general direction, the Park and Recreation Program Manager is responsible for planning, organizing, coordinating and supervising the Division of State Parks’ park and recreation program, which includes conducting complex studies and analyses; planning and managing archaeological and promotional contracts and grants; assigning and reviewing work performed; evaluating present and future recreational needs and opportunities; and managing land acquisitions and exchanges. Develop work programs and specific tasks necessary to prepare and update statewide recreation plans, individual park master plans, resource protection plans, feasibility studies and other supporting studies and documentation; conduct research using technical, scientific and historical data; coordinate with other agencies involved in the implementation of park and recreation resource programs; negotiate with other federal, State, and local entities concerning multi-jurisdictional issues and represent the agency at various meetings. Manage planning, archaeological, and promotional contracts by developing the scope of work, selecting consultants, negotiating contracts, and approving and supervising work programs. Coordinate agency grant applications by seeking potential funding sources for capital improvement, resource protection and property acquisition projects; write grants and monitor compliance
    [Show full text]
  • Transit-Oriented Development and Joint Development in the United States: a Literature Review
    Transit Cooperative Research Program Sponsored by the Federal Transit Administration RESEARCH RESULTS DIGEST October 2002—Number 52 Subject Area: VI Public Transit Responsible Senior Program Officer: Gwen Chisholm Transit-Oriented Development and Joint Development in the United States: A Literature Review This digest summarizes the literature review of TCRP Project H-27, “Transit-Oriented Development: State of the Practice and Future Benefits.” This digest provides definitions of transit-oriented development (TOD) and transit joint development (TJD), describes the institutional issues related to TOD and TJD, and provides examples of the impacts and benefits of TOD and TJD. References and an annotated bibliography are included. This digest was written by Robert Cervero, Christopher Ferrell, and Steven Murphy, from the Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California, Berkeley. CONTENTS IV.2 Supportive Public Policies: Finance and Tax Policies, 46 I INTRODUCTION, 2 IV.3 Supportive Public Policies: Land-Based I.1 Defining Transit-Oriented Development, 5 Initiatives, 54 I.2 Defining Transit Joint Development, 7 IV.4 Supportive Public Policies: Zoning and I.3 Literature Review, 9 Regulations, 57 IV.5 Supportive Public Policies: Complementary II INSTITUTIONAL ISSUES, 10 Infrastructure, 61 II.1 The Need for Collaboration, 10 IV.6 Supportive Public Policies: Procedural and II.2 Collaboration and Partnerships, 12 Programmatic Approaches, 61 II.3 Community Outreach, 12 IV.7 Use of Value Capture, 66 II.4 Government Roles, 14
    [Show full text]
  • 25 Great Ideas of New Urbanism
    25 Great Ideas of New Urbanism 1 Cover photo: Lancaster Boulevard in Lancaster, California. Source: City of Lancaster. Photo by Tamara Leigh Photography. Street design by Moule & Polyzoides. 25 GREAT IDEAS OF NEW URBANISM Author: Robert Steuteville, CNU Senior Dyer, Victor Dover, Hank Dittmar, Brian Communications Advisor and Public Square Falk, Tom Low, Paul Crabtree, Dan Burden, editor Wesley Marshall, Dhiru Thadani, Howard Blackson, Elizabeth Moule, Emily Talen, CNU staff contributors: Benjamin Crowther, Andres Duany, Sandy Sorlien, Norman Program Fellow; Mallory Baches, Program Garrick, Marcy McInelly, Shelley Poticha, Coordinator; Moira Albanese, Program Christopher Coes, Jennifer Hurley, Bill Assistant; Luke Miller, Project Assistant; Lisa Lennertz, Susan Henderson, David Dixon, Schamess, Communications Manager Doug Farr, Jessica Millman, Daniel Solomon, Murphy Antoine, Peter Park, Patrick Kennedy The 25 great idea interviews were published as articles on Public Square: A CNU The Congress for the New Urbanism (CNU) Journal, and edited for this book. See www. helps create vibrant and walkable cities, towns, cnu.org/publicsquare/category/great-ideas and neighborhoods where people have diverse choices for how they live, work, shop, and get Interviewees: Elizabeth Plater-Zyberk, Jeff around. People want to live in well-designed Speck, Dan Parolek, Karen Parolek, Paddy places that are unique and authentic. CNU’s Steinschneider, Donald Shoup, Jeffrey Tumlin, mission is to help build those places. John Anderson, Eric Kronberg, Marianne Cusato, Bruce Tolar, Charles Marohn, Joe Public Square: A CNU Journal is a Minicozzi, Mike Lydon, Tony Garcia, Seth publication dedicated to illuminating and Harry, Robert Gibbs, Ellen Dunham-Jones, cultivating best practices in urbanism in the Galina Tachieva, Stefanos Polyzoides, John US and beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Combat Post-Natural Disaster Related Environmental
    Union College Union | Digital Works Honors Theses Student Work 3-2019 How to Combat Post-Natural Disaster Related Environmental Gentrification and Environmental Inequality Accelerated by Climate Change Marielle Christie Union College - Schenectady, NY Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalworks.union.edu/theses Part of the Other Life Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Christie, Marielle, "How to Combat Post-Natural Disaster Related Environmental Gentrification and Environmental Inequality Accelerated by Climate Change" (2019). Honors Theses. 2275. https://digitalworks.union.edu/theses/2275 This Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Work at Union | Digital Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of Union | Digital Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. How to Combat Post-Natural Disaster Related Environmental Gentrification and Environmental Inequality Accelerated by Climate Change By Marielle Christie ********** Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science/Arts Environmental Science and Policy Program UNION COLLEGE March, 2019 Abstract CHRISTIE, MARIELLE, How to Combat Post-Natural Disaster Related Environmental Gentrification and Environmental Inequality Accelerated by Climate Change, Environmental Science and Policy Program, Union College, Schenectady, New York, March 2019. This thesis aims to illustrate the concept of natural disaster-induced environmental gentrification. There is a heightened vulnerability to unmitigated forced displacement by socioeconomically disadvantaged residents following a natural disaster. Environmental gentrification is a variant of green gentrification. Green gentrification occurs when providing green amenities to a city increases local property values and attracts wealthier residents to a previously polluted or disenfranchised neighborhood, which displaces the low-income residents.
    [Show full text]
  • Financing Strategies for Encouraging Infill and Redevelopment
    Denver Regional Council of Governments Financing Strategies for Encouraging Infill and Redevelopment April 2006 Abstract Title: Financing Strategies for Encouraging Infill and Redevelopment Author: Denver Regional Council of Governments (DRCOG) 4500 Cherry Creek Drive South, Suite 800 Denver, Colorado 80246-1531 303-455-1000 http://www.drcog.org Subject: Regional and local community planning and development Date: April 2006 Number of Pages: 29 Abstract: This report provides information for local governments on financing strategies that could support infill and redevelopment in their communities. It includes general principles of financing real estate development, explains common public-sector finance mechanisms, and includes several brief case studies of local and national examples. Financing Strategies for Encouraging Infill and Redevelopment April 2006 Table of Contents Page Introduction 3 Definition of Infill and Redevelopment 3 Infill and Redevelopment in Context 4 General Principles of Financing Real Estate Development 6 Elements of a Financial Package 6 Financial Participants 7 Loan Considerations 7 Special Considerations in Financing Infill Development 8 Public Sector Finance Mechanisms 9 Direct Investment 11 Public/Private Partnerships 11 Urban Renewal Authorities 11 Indirect Investment 12 Tax Credits or Abatements 12 Other Abatements 12 Special Taxing Districts 13 Other Actions to Reduce Project Costs 14 Financial Assistance 14 Tax Increment Financing 14 Loan Guarantees 15 No Risk Forms of Assistance 15 State or Federal Resources 15 Case Studies 16 Tax Increment Financing 17 Tax Abatements 20 City as Master Developer 25 Conclusion 27 Glossary 28 1 2 Financing Strategies for Encouraging Infill and Redevelopment Introduction In 2005 the Denver Regional Council of Governments (DRCOG) adopted the Metro Vision 2030 regional plan.
    [Show full text]
  • The Congress for the New Urbanism Views Disinvestment in Central Cities
    The Congress for the New Urbanism views disinvestment in central cities, the spread of placeless sprawl, increasing separation by race and income, environmental deterioration, loss of agricultural lands and wilderness, and the erosion of society’s built heritage as one interrelated community-building challenge. We stand for the restoration of existing urban centers and towns within coherent metropolitan regions, the reconfiguration of sprawling suburbs into communities of real neighborhoods and diverse districts, the conservation of natural environments, and the preservation of our built legacy. We advocate the restructuring of public policy and development practices to support the following principles: neighborhoods should be diverse in use and population; communities should be designed for the pedestrian and transit as well as the car; cities and towns should be shaped by physically defined and universally accessible public spaces and community institutions; urban places should be framed by architecture and landscape design that celebrate local history, climate, ecology, and building practice. We recognize that physical solutions by themselves will not solve social and economic problems, but neither can economic vitality, community stability, and environmental health be sustained without a coherent and supportive physical framework. We represent a broad-based citizenry, composed of public and private sector leaders, community activists, and multidisciplinary professionals. We are committed to reestablishing the relationship between the
    [Show full text]
  • Suburban Gentrification: Understanding the Determinants of Single-Family Residential Redevelopment, a Case Study of the Inner-Ring Suburbs of Chicago, IL, 2000-2010
    Joint Center for Housing Studies Harvard University Suburban Gentrification: Understanding the Determinants of Single-family Residential Redevelopment, A Case Study of the Inner-Ring Suburbs of Chicago, IL, 2000-2010 Suzanne Lanyi Charles February 2011 W11-1 Suzanne Lanyi Charles is the 2008 recipient of the John R. Meyer Dissertation Fellowship The author wishes to thank her dissertation committee members, Richard Peiser, Susan Fainstein, Judith Grant Long, and Daniel McMillen, as well as Eric Belsky for helpful comments and suggestions. She is also grateful to the Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University, the Real Estate Academic Initiative of Harvard University, and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development for providing research funding. © by Suzanne Lanyi Charles. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. Prepared under Grant Number H-21570 SG from the Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of University Partnerships. Points of views or opinions in this document are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Any opinions expressed are those of the author and not those of the Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University or of any of the persons or organizations providing support to the Joint Center for Housing Studies. Abstract Suburban gentrification is most visible through capital reinvestment in the built environment. In this paper, I examine one type of reinvestment—the incremental, residential redevelopment process in which older single-family housing is demolished and replaced with larger single- family housing.
    [Show full text]
  • Moving Beyond Cleanup: Identifying the Crucibles of Environmental Gentrification
    Moving Beyond Cleanup: Identifying the Crucibles of Environmental Gentrification H. Spencer Banzhaf and Eleanor McCormick Working Paper Series Working Paper # 07-02 January, 2007 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency National Center for Environmental Economics 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW (MC 1809) Washington, DC 20460 http://www.epa.gov/economics Moving Beyond Cleanup: Identifying the Crucibles of Environmental Gentrification H. Spencer Banzhaf and Eleanor McCormick Correspondence: Spencer Banzhaf Department of Economics Georgia State University P.O. Box 3992 Atlanta, GA30302 (404) 651-6981, [email protected] NCEE Working Paper Series Working Paper # 07-02 January, 2007 DISCLAIMER The views expressed in this paper are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent those of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. In addition, although the research described in this paper may have been funded entirely or in part by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, it has not been subjected to the Agency's required peer and policy review. No official Agency endorsement should be inferred. Moving Beyond Cleanup: Identifying the Crucibles of Environmental Gentrification H. Spencer Banzhaf Georgia State University Eleanor McCormick Resources for the Future Correspondence: Spencer Banzhaf Department of Economics, Georgia State University PO Box 3992, Atlanta, GA 30302 404-651-6981, [email protected] Report Prepared for the National Center for Environmental Economics (EPA) December 2006 This paper reviews the distributional impacts associated with "environmental gentrification" following the cleanup and reuse of Superfund sites, brownfields, and other locally undesirable land uses (LULUs). By making a neighborhood more attractive, cleanup and reuse of LULUs may drive up local real estate prices.
    [Show full text]
  • Defining and Environmental and Sustainability Planning
    1. Scope of the book - defining and environmental and sustainability planning 1.1 Planning There are three keys words that need to be defined, or at least have their meaning refined: environmental, sustainability and planning. We’ll start with ‘planning’. ‘Planning’ for the purposes of this book is land use planning. As Thompson and Maginn (2012) note, planning is about making decisions which facilitate future actions. It is mostly seen as applying to cities, to allow for the orderly development of residential areas, employment centres, supporting infrastructure and services. These future actions can either be long-term plan making, in some cases up to 50 years, more short-term decision making like zoning, or more immediate decision making like development approval (for example approval to construct a house). Planning can be legally binding, or statutory, where decision making specifically allows or dis-allows certain land uses. These include zoning of land, subdivision and development approval. Planning also has non statutory elements, for example most strategic plans and policies are used to guide statutory planning but are, for the most part, not legally binding. Planning is not just done by the traditional land use planning agencies (in WA it is the Western Australian Planning Commission and the Department of Planning). National Parks and Nature Reserves are usually vested in, and managed by, conservation or environmental agencies, and these agencies usually have statutory powers to plan and control land uses of these lands. Some agencies have special powers in relation to certain resources, which enables them to apply special land use control over land affected by those resources.
    [Show full text]