DOCSLIB.ORG

After Watching This Episode, Choose from the Following Questions And/Or

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
After Watching This Episode, Choose from the Following Questions And/Or Monday, May 18 9:00am American Experience: Chasing the Moon, Part 1 - 9th thru 12th + grades This is a documentary series about the space race, from its earliest beginnings to the monumental achievement of the first lunar landing in 1969 and beyond. The three-part series recasts the Space Age as a fascinating stew of scientific innovation and PR savvy, political calculation and media spectacle, visionary impulses and personal drama. The film features new interviews with a diverse cast of characters who played key roles in these historic events. Among those are astronauts Buzz Aldrin, Frank Borman and Bill Anders; Freeman Dyson, the renowned futurist and theoretical physicist; Sergei Khrushchev, the son of former Soviet premier Nikita Khrushchev, who played a prominent role in the Soviet space program as a rocket engineer; Poppy Northcutt, the 25-year-old “mathematics whiz” who gained worldwide attention as the first woman to serve in the all-male bastion of NASA’s Mission Control; and Ed Dwight, the Air Force pilot selected by the Kennedy administration to train as America’s first black astronaut. In part 1 explore the early days of the space race, the struggle to catch up with the Soviet Union and the enormous stakes in the quest to reach the moon. This episode reveals both the breathtaking failures and successes of the developing U.S. space program. After watching this episode, choose from the following questions and/or tasks to extend your learning Question Box 1 Why did humans want to go to the moon? What is the acceleration of the rocket to overcome the earth's gravitational pull? What year did Soviet Sputnik launch? At what speed did Sputnik travel around the earth? Why was Sputnik 2 launched? What did Von Braun propose to the US? Explain the third stage rocket motor of the Van Guard vehicle. Who and how was Jupiter C launched? After WWII what did the US get from Germany? Who was ham? Who was the first man in space? What year did the cosmonaut fly around the world? Who was Commander Shepard? How much did space exploration cost the US in 1961? Continued on the next page… Question Box 2 What did LB Johnson mean progress is going to result only by bold decisions that are made by cool heads? Why was the US and Soviet Union at a political/space war? Were these vessels used for war or space exploration? Why did the Vanguard missile fail and how much money was allocated? Why was Von Braun important to Germany? What did Von Braun mean by taking life out of this planet into the universe? Why were the German scientists more important than weapons? Why did the 120 scientists become US citizens? How did live television play a role in our space race? Was exploration of space a leadership decision? Box 3 (Tasks) In 1960, NASA’s budget was $401 million, which was 0.5% of the federal budget. In 1965, NASA’s budget was $5,092 million, which was 4.31% of the federal budget. How much of an increase was this? Why do you think the federal government approved such an increase? Use mathematics to justify your reasoning. Explain with evidence, some of the scientific contributions made by the scientists that immigrated to the United States before and during WWII. Box 4 (Enrichment) Trace the trajectory of Sputnik around the world. Make a model of a Rocket. Make a timeline of all rocket scientists. Make a book creator for each one of the right stuff astronauts. Explain using evidence, who was Max Plank, and why did he decide to stay in Germany during WWII. What was the Manhattan Project and what role did the recently immigrated scientists play in that project? Box 5 (Extend/Real-Life) Project the year that humans would be on the moon again and Mars for the first time. Does science have political implications? How much is space exploration costing us now. Write a speech explaining the advantages/disadvantages of an outpost on the moon. Observe the moon and learn about moon exploration at this link: https://moon.nasa.gov/ Would you consider a STEM career? Why or why not? What would it be? .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Works Cited Primary Sources CBS News
    Alaniz 1 ​ Works Cited ​ Primary Sources CBS News. “Apollo 11 Splashdown Live Stream: Watch ‘Live’ Coverage of the Apollo 11 Splashdown on This Date 50 Years Ago.” CBS News, CBS News, 24 July 2019, ​ ​ www.cbsnews.com/news/apollo-11-splashdown-watch-live-stream-50-years-ago-today-2 019-07-24/. Accessed 17 Dec. 2019. This source includes a wide variety of pictures and videos of the Apollo 11 landing back on Earth. It depicts the same live footage taken by CBS News on that day and images of the Apollo crew after they landed. It also includes videos of President Nixon greeting them on the boat and making a public declaration with them in quarantine after. This source brings the events that happened after the landing to my project. Freshspot Marketing LLC, and David Meerman Scott. “Apollo Press Kits.” Apollopresskits.Com, ​ ​ 2016, www.apollopresskits.com. This source includes valuable additional information not found in NASA issued news releases. Reporters and editors from media outlets including television and newspapers had access to such documents from dozens of manufacturers while working on stories about the first lunar landing, all their findings are located within the press kits found in this website. Those exclusive findings bring unknown facts that weren’t told before to my project. Alaniz 2 ​ Kennedy, John F. “We Choose To Go To The Moon” Speech. Address at Rice University on the ​ ​ Nation’s Space Effort. Document. This source includes the complete speech delivered by President John F. Kennedy at Rice ​ Stadium in Houston, Texas, on September 12, 1962.
    [Show full text]
  • Occasionally, the Volume Suffers from the Problem of Repetition. This
    I I Occasionally, the volume suffers from the problem of repetition. This was proba- bly an editorial choice, and it does serve to bolster the truth-value of these memoirs; yet, in my view, this repetition weakens the force of the selections and makes it more likely that the reader will become desensitized to the real tragedies described in the memoirs. This said, Till My Tale Is Told is an important testimony to the Stalinist years and very useful as a teaching tool. Each selection is introduced by someone who knew the author of the piece (and/or by the editor of the volume). There is a good glossary and a short history of events at the back of the book as well as two short, in- formation-packed introductions (to the English and Russian editions) by Simeon Vilensky, and an afterword by John Crowfoot. The translations are good. And each of the testimonies begins with a photograph of the author - some in their youth, some in old age; this visual evocation provides intimacy and poignancy to the stories told in words. The original volume, Dodnes' tiagoteet (A Burden Borne to This Day) is longer by seven memoirs than the English edition; this editing down is an excellent choice as it makes the book more suitable for teaching. Overall, this is an intelligent volume - well thought-out and well put together. Till My Tale Is Told adds a great deal to those accounts already published: it delineates perspectives that are often different from the well-known accounts of Ginzburg and Solzhenitsyn and enhances such recent works as the diary selections in the 1995 Intimacy and Terror (Garros, Korenevskaya, La- husen, editors).
    [Show full text]
  • THE SOVIET MOON PROGRAM in the 1960S, the United States Was Not the Only Country That Was Trying to Land Someone on the Moon and Bring Him Back to Earth Safely
    AIAA AEROSPACE M ICRO-LESSON Easily digestible Aerospace Principles revealed for K-12 Students and Educators. These lessons will be sent on a bi-weekly basis and allow grade-level focused learning. - AIAA STEM K-12 Committee. THE SOVIET MOON PROGRAM In the 1960s, the United States was not the only country that was trying to land someone on the Moon and bring him back to Earth safely. The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, also called the Soviet Union, also had a manned lunar program. This lesson describes some of it. Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS): ● Discipline: Engineering Design ● Crosscutting Concept: Systems and System Models ● Science & Engineering Practice: Constructing Explanations and Designing Solutions GRADES K-2 K-2-ETS1-1. Ask questions, make observations, and gather information about a situation people want to change to define a simple problem that can be solved through the development of a new or improved object or tool. Have you ever been busy doing something when somebody challenges you to a race? If you decide to join the race—and it is usually up to you whether you join or not—you have to stop what you’re doing, get up, and start racing. By the time you’ve gotten started, the other person is often halfway to the goal. This is the sort of situation the Soviet Union found itself in when President Kennedy in 1961 announced that the United States would set a goal of landing a man on the Moon and returning him safely to the Earth before the end of the decade.
    [Show full text]
  • Korolev: How One Man Masterminded the Soviet Drive to Beat America to the Moon James Harford
    To purchase this product, please visit https://www.wiley.com/en-us/9780471327219 Korolev: How One Man Masterminded the Soviet Drive to Beat America to the Moon James Harford Paperback 978-0-471-32721-9 March 1999 Print-on- $26.00 demand DESCRIPTION How One Man Masterminded the Soviet Drive Beat America to the Moon. "Fascinating . packed with technical and historical detail for the space expert and enthusiast alike . Great stuff!"-New Scientist "In this exceptional book, James Harford pieces together a most compelling and well-written tale. Must reading."-Space News. "Through masterful research and an engaging narrative style, James Harford gives the world its first in-depth look at the man who should rightly be called the father of the Soviet space program."-Norman R. Augustine, CEO, Lockheed Martin. "In Korolev, James Harford has written a masterly biography of this enigmatic 'Chief Designer' whose role the Soviets kept secret for fear that Western agents might 'get at' him."-Daily Telegraph. "Harford's fluency in Russian and his intimate knowledge of space technology give us insights that few, if any, Americans and Russians have had into this dark history of Soviet space."-Dr. Herbert Friedman, Chief Scientist, Hulburt Center for Space Research Naval Research Laboratory. "Reveals the complex, driven personality of a man who, despite unjust imprisonment in the Gulag, toiled tirelessly for the Soviet military industrial complex. More than just a biography, this is also a history of the Soviet space program at the height of the Cold War. Highly recommended."-Library Journal. "For decades the identity of the Russian Chief Designer who shocked the world with the launching of the first Sputnik was one of the Soviet Union's best-kept secrets.
    [Show full text]
  • "The Road to the Stars Is Paved by the Communists!": Soviet Propaganda and the Hero-Myth of Iurii Gagarin
    "The Road to the Stars is Paved by the Communists!": Soviet Propaganda and the Hero-Myth of Iurii Gagarin Trevor Rockwell B.A., University of Victoria, 2003 A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS in the Department of History O Trevor Sean Rockwell, 2005 All rights reserved. This thesis may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without the permission of the author. Supervisor: Dr. Serhy Y ekelchyk ABSTRACT This thesis addresses Soviet propaganda of the world's first cosmonaut, Iurii Gagarin, and the first-manned space flight, Vostok 1, which took place on April 12, 1961. This thesis compares official Soviet biographies of Gagarin's life and Communist Party resolutions of the late 1950s and early 1960s. Key documents include Gagarin's autobiography The Road to the Stars (1961), and the Third Party Program of 1961. It concludes that the Gagarin propaganda closely corresponded to Party directives. In doing so, this thesis analyzes the key themes of the propaganda and suggests how the propaganda was used to legitimize the regime of Nikita Khrushchev. Supervisor: Dr. Serhy Yekelchyk (Department of History) TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract Table of Contents Introduction: Space Age Histories Chapter One: The Agitprop Apparatus Chapter Two: The General Line Chapter Three: Our Gagarin Chapter Four: The Road to the Stars Chapter Five: The Molding of the Rising Generation Conclusion: Immortal Gagarin Bibliography INTRODUCTION: SPACE AGE HISTORIES To put the first man in space was a highly symbolic technological milestone. Well aware of the propaganda benefits to be derived from such a feat, the USSR and the USA were, in 1961, racing to be the first.
    [Show full text]
  • Soviet Citizens' Opinions of Peace During the Cold War, May 1960
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Carolina Digital Repository For Peace and Friendship of All Countries: Soviet Citizens' Opinions of Peace during the Cold War, May 1960 Aaron Todd Hale-Dorrell A thesis submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of History. Chapel Hill 2009 Approved by: Donald J. Raleigh Louise McReynolds Donald M. Reid Abstract AARON TODD HALE-DORRELL: For Peace and Friendship of All Countries: Soviet Citizens' Opinions of Peace During the Cold War, May 1960 (Under the Direction of Dr. Donald J. Raleigh) This thesis analyzes a public opinion survey that sociologist Boris Grushin conducted in the Soviet Union in May 1960. His survey asked average Soviet citizens about war and peace immediately following a Cold War incident in which the Soviet military destroyed an American U-2 spy plane that had violated Soviet airspace. This thesis questions why, despite resulting heightened tensions between the superpowers, 96.8 percent of survey respondents expressed confidence that humanity could prevent war. I argue that, while propaganda promoting Khrushchev's “peaceful coexistence” policy influenced every respondent, some respondents emphasized different official policies and explanations for events, demonstrating a degree of independence from propaganda. Furthermore, respondents justified belief in peace and integrated themselves into a collective war narrative by describing experiences of World War II. Finally, I show that official interest in public opinion reflects Khrushchev-era political and cultural reforms, especially in Soviet journalism and sociology.
    [Show full text]
  • Interview with Dr. Sergei Khrushchev, April 18, 2008 Kyle Kordon Chapman University
    Voces Novae Volume 1 Article 11 2018 Interview with Dr. Sergei Khrushchev, April 18, 2008 Kyle Kordon Chapman University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/vocesnovae Part of the Other History Commons Recommended Citation Kordon, Kyle (2018) "Interview with Dr. Sergei Khrushchev, April 18, 2008," Voces Novae: Vol. 1 , Article 11. Available at: https://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/vocesnovae/vol1/iss1/11 This Oral History is brought to you for free and open access by Chapman University Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Voces Novae by an authorized editor of Chapman University Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Kordon: Interview with Dr. Sergei Khrushchev, April 18, 2008 Interview with Dr. Sergei Khruschchev, April 18, 2008 Voces Novae: Chapman University Historical Review, Vol 1, No 1 (2009) HOME ABOUT LOGIN REGISTER SEARCH CURRENT ARCHIVES PHI ALPHA THETA Home > Vol 1, No 1 (2009) > Kordon Interview with Dr. Sergei Khrushchev, April 18, 2008 Kyle Kordon On April 18, 2008 I interviewed Dr. Sergei Khrushchev, the son of the late Soviet Premier, Nikita S. Khrushchev. The following is the transcript of that interview. This was the first of two interviews that I conducted with the younger Khrushchev at Brown University in Providence, Rhode Island. The topic of the interview was very broad. Its original purpose was for a research paper for a Russian History class that I took in the spring of 2008 at Chapman University, instructed by Dr. William Cumiford. My goal was to discuss as many topics as possible in order to gain some material for the foundation of the research paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Roots of Russia's War in Ukraine Book Author(S): ELIZABETH A
    Roots of Russia’s War in Ukraine This content downloaded from 130.64.11.153 on Tue, 19 Jul 2016 22:53:58 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms This content downloaded from 130.64.11.153 on Tue, 19 Jul 2016 22:53:58 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms Roots of Russia’s War in Ukraine ELIZABETH A. WOOD WILLIAM E. POMERANZ E. WAYNE MERRY MAXIM TRUDOLYUBOV Woodrow Wilson Center Press Washington, D.C. Columbia University Press New York This content downloaded from 130.64.11.153 on Tue, 19 Jul 2016 22:53:58 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms Woodrow Wilson Center Press Washington, D.C. www.wilsoncenter.org Columbia University Press Publishers Since 1893 New York • Chichester, West Sussex cup.columbia.edu Copyright © 2016 Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars All rights reserved Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Wood, Elizabeth A., 1958– author. | Pomeranz, William E., author. | Merry, E. Wayne, author. | Trudolyubov, Maxim. Title: Roots of Russia’s war in Ukraine / Elizabeth A. Wood, William E. Pomeranz, E. Wayne Merry, and Maxim Trudolyubov. Description: Washington, D.C. : Woodrow Wilson Center Press ; New York : Columbia University Press, 2015. | Includes index. Identifiers: LCCN 2015038287 | ISBN 9780231704533 (pbk.) | ISBN 9780231801386 (ebook) Subjects: LCSH: Ukraine Conflict, 2014– —Causes | Ukraine—Foreign relations—Russia (Federation) | Russia (Federation)—Foreign relations— Ukraine. Classification: LCC DK508.852 .W66 2015 | DDC 947.7086—dc23 LC record available at http://lccn.loc.gov/2015038287 Woodrow Wilson Center Press and Columbia University Press books are printed on permanent and durable acid-free paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Fifty Years Ago This Month, the Cuban Missile Crisis Veered Perilously Close to Nuclear War
    Fifty years ago this month, the Cuban Missile Crisis veered perilously close to nuclear war. A U-2 flies an ISR mission over the Caribbean. The spyplanes were used to obtain proof that the Soviets were installing nuclear missiles in Cuba. USAF photo AIR FORCE Magazine / October 2012 32 HIGH NOON By John T. Correll n the 1960 presidential election campaign, Democratic The United States had been embarrassed the previous year by candidate John F. Kennedy raised the alarm about a “missile the failure of the Bay of Pigs invasion, but US efforts to over- gap” in which he said the United States trailed dangerously throw Fidel Castro’s regime in Cuba continued. Lately, Castro’s Ibehind the Soviet Union. allegiance to Soviet leadership had weakened as he drifted Kennedy’s claims were later revealed to be in error. There toward the Chinese, who espoused a more aggressive brand of indeed was a missile gap, but it was in favor of the United States, Communism. Khrushchev needed a dramatic demonstration of which had four or five times as many ICBMs as the Soviets did. his commitment to Cuba. The US Polaris submarine-launched ballistic missile was newly Walking alongside Khrushchev on the beach was Defense operational, whereas the Soviet Union did not yet have any SLBMs. Minister Rodion Malinovsky, who pointed toward the opposite Kennedy knew this all along. At the direction of President Dwight shore of the Black Sea, where the Americans were deploying D. Eisenhower, the Democratic candidates had been briefed by intermediate-range Jupiter missiles in Turkey.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 14 “We Choose to Go to the Moon” JFK and the Race for The
    Chapter 14 “We Choose to Go to the Moon” JFK and the Race for the Moon, 1960-1963 Richard E. Collin Space Exploration on the Eve of the Kennedy Presidency At the time of John F. Kennedy's election to the U.S. Presidency on November 8, 1960, the Space Age was three years old. The Soviet Union had launched it with a successful orbiting in October 1957 of Sputnik I, an aluminum ball measuring 23 inches in diameter and weighing 184 pounds. It was not until the following January in 1958 that the United States orbited its first satellite, Explorer I. Meanwhile, the Soviet Union continued its high-profile thrust into space, capturing the world’s imagination with a series of “firsts” – orbiting the first living creature, a female dog named Laika (in Sputnik II, November 3, 1957); sending the first manmade probe to impact another world, in this case, the Moon (Luna II, September 12, 1959); and taking the first photographs of the far side of the Moon (Luna III, October 4, 1959). Space, JFK and the 1960 Campaign A key theme in Kennedy's race for the White House was his claim that the country's prestige had declined under the Eisenhower Administration, principally because of its record in space. During the campaign, Kennedy pounded hard about what he perceived as America's failures in space. Yet he remained silent about what he had in mind for his own program. He was not at all convinced that manned space flight should play a role in his Administration.1 As U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Glimpses Inside the Kremlin During the Cuban Missile Crisis Introduction by Timothy Naftali1
    SECTION 3: Soviet Union The Malin Notes: Glimpses Inside the Kremlin during the Cuban Missile Crisis Introduction by Timothy Naftali1 he John F. Kennedy Presidential Library’s October did the bulk of the updating, also contributed translations for 1996 release of the White House recordings made by two notes not currently on the Miller Center’s website. President Kennedy during the Cuban Missile Crisis Trevolutionized our understanding of how the American side What do the Notes Tell Us? handled the most dangerous nuclear crisis of the Cold War.2 Some months earlier, the late Aleksandr Fursenko, a member In 1969 former British Prime Minister Harold Macmillan of the Russian Academy of Sciences, had learned about a col- in his introduction to Robert F. Kennedy’s Thirteen Days lection of official notes from the meetings of the Presidium— laid out a basic research agenda for students of the Kremlin the top decision-making body of the Soviet communist party side of the Cuban missile crisis: “why did the Russians risk and therefore of the USSR—during the missile crisis. These so much? What was their ultimate purpose? Why did they notes, which were written out in longhand by Vladimir withdraw? Why did they not retaliate at other, but equally Malin, the chief of the General Department of the Central sensitive, points?”5 Committee, formally recorded the Presidium’s decisions and, On the eve of the fiftieth anniversary of the Cuban occasionally, the discussion and justification behind the deci- Missile Crisis, how well do the Malin notes help us answer sions. Fursenko was able to get access to a few, but by no Macmillan’s questions? And do they suggest any others? means all, of the notes relevant to the Cuban missile crisis 3 for our 1997 book, “One Hell of a Gamble.” In 2003, the Why did the Soviets risk so much? What was their ultimate Russian State Archive of Contemporary History (RGANI), purpose? published a more complete collection of the Cuban Missile Crisis notes in Volume 1 of Archivii Kremlya, an edition over- Let’s take these questions together.
    [Show full text]
  • Essence of Revision: Moscow, Havana, and the Cuban Missile Crisis Author(S): Bruce J
    Essence of Revision: Moscow, Havana, and the Cuban Missile Crisis Author(s): Bruce J. Allyn, James G. Blight and David A. Welch Reviewed work(s): Source: International Security, Vol. 14, No. 3 (Winter, 1989-1990), pp. 136-172 Published by: The MIT Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2538934 . Accessed: 18/09/2012 11:11 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The MIT Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to International Security. http://www.jstor.org BruceJ. Allyn, Essence of Revision JamesG. Blight,and Moscow, Havana, and the David A. Welch Cuban Missile Crisis The eventreferred to as the "Cuban missile crisis" in the United States is called the "Caribbean crisis"in the Soviet Union, and the "October crisis" in Cuba; but in all three countriesit is widely acknowledged to have been the single most dangerous episode of the Cold War. Analysis of the crisishas heretoforebeen one-sided. Although informationabout the American side of the crisis is relatively plentiful,both Cuba and the Soviet Union have closely guarded the histories of theirsides of the event.1 Glasnost,however, has led to a series of unprec- The authors gratefullyacknowledge the assistance of Graham T.
    [Show full text]