Benchmark Ultra-Cool Dwarfs in Widely Separated Binary Systems

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Benchmark Ultra-Cool Dwarfs in Widely Separated Binary Systems EPJ Web of Conferences 16, 06014 (2011) DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/20111606014 C Owned by the authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2011 Benchmark ultra-cool dwarfs in widely separated binary systems Z.H. Zhang1,a,D.J.Pinfield1, A.C. Day-Jones2, B. Burningham1 and H.R.A. Jones1 1Centre for Astrophysics Research, University of Hertfordshrie, Hatfield AL10 9AB, UK 2Department of Astronomy, Universidad de Chile, Casilla postal 36D, Santiago, Chile Abstract. Ultra-cool dwarfs as wide companions to subgiants, giants, white dwarfs and main sequence stars can be very good benchmark objects, for which we can infer physical properties with minimal reference to theoretical models, through association with the primary stars. We have searched for benchmark ultra- cool dwarfs in widely separated binary systems using SDSS, UKIDSS, and 2MASS. We then estimate spectral types using SDSS spectroscopy and multi-band colors, place constraints on distance, and perform proper motions calculations for all candidates which have sufficient epoch baseline coverage. Analysis of the proper motion and distance constraints show that eight of our ultra-cool dwarfs are members of widely separated binary systems. Another L3.5 dwarf, SDSS 0832, is shown to be a companion to the bright K3 giant Cancri. Such primaries can provide age and metallicity constraints for any companion objects, yielding excellent benchmark objects. This is the first wide ultra-cool dwarf + giant binary system identified. 1. INTRODUCTION Current brown dwarf (BD) models have difficulty in accurately reproducing observations, and benchmark objects are thus needed to calibrate both atmospheric and evolutionary models. In order for a brown dwarf to be considered a benchmark it must have one or more properties (e.g. age, mass, distance, metallicity) that can be constrained relatively independently of models. BDs as members of binaries are very useful for this purpose, where the host star can provide age, distance and in some cases metallicity constraints. How useful these systems are, is dependent on how well we understand the nature and physics of the primary stars. Evolved stars, e.g. subgiants, giants and white dwarfs can constraint accurate ages, as well as metallicity in the case of subgiants and early phase giant stars, via robust spectroscopic models. These types of binary system can populate the full age range of the disk up to 10 Gyrs [1]. In this paper we report the discovery of nine common proper motion (PM) binary systems with ultra-cool dwarf (UCD) components. One is a benchmark L dwarf companion to the giant star Cancri, and the other eight are late M and early L dwarf companions to K-M dwarf stars. 2. ULTRA-COOL DWARF SELECTION CRITERIA The i − z color of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) [2] as we have shown in our previous work [3], is particularly useful for the selection of UCDs. In this work, we focus on a bluer sample to increase the sample size and fraction of objects that have measured SDSS spectra [4]. Our selections here include 1.5 <i− z<2 and 1.5 <r− i<4.5 for objects with SDSS spectra, and a more constraining selection for objects without spectra, requiring 1.7 <i− z<2, 2 <r− i<3.3, r − i<7(i − z) − 9.3, ae-mail: [email protected] This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial License 3.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any noncommercial medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Article available at http://www.epj-conferences.org or http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/20111606014 EPJ Web of Conferences Figure 1. Left panel: PMs of nine binary systems. Spectral types of the primary stars (black squares) and UCDs (red circles) are labeled. A short line is used to separated two crowded binary systems. Right panel: Distances of UCDs and their primary star. Spectral type combinations are listed in according distance of primaries in the bottom right of the plot. The red squares and blue diamonds indicate the objects with and without SDSS spectra respectively. 16 <z<19.5, and 17 <i<21.2. In addition we placed an additional selection of early L dwarf candidates towards the Praesepe (M44) cluster. We used the same color criteria as previously described for SDSS objects without spectra, but limited our search to 19 <z<20.5, and 21 <i<22.4, corresponding to early L dwarfs at ∼100–200 pc. SDSS selected candidates were cross matched with point sources in the Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS) [5] and UKIRT Infrared Deep Sky Survey (UKIDSS) [6] catalogues. 563 objects with spectra were cross matched in SDSS and 2MASS, of which 469 were also cross matched in UKIDSS large area survey (LAS). 1761 objects without spectra were cross matched in SDSS and 2MASS, of which 338 objects were cross matched in UKIDSS. So 807 SDSS objects (see online material for these UCDs) were cross matched in 2MASS and UKIDSS of which 469 objects have SDSS spectra. For our UCD sample towards Praesepe, we cross matched candidates with the UKIDSS Galactic Cluster Survey. For 469 UCD candidates with SDSS spectra, we assigned their spectral type with the HAMMER pipeline [7]. 34 objects of them are new L dwarfs. We used optical-NIR color–spectral type relationships [3, 8] to assign the spectral types of 338 objects without SDSS spectra. 3. ULTRA-COOL DWARF BINARIES A total of 807 objects in our sample matched in 2MASS-UKIDSS, so we calculated their PMs from their database coordinates and epochs, following the method described in Zhang et al. (2006) [3]. Eight of them were found to have common PMs to K-M dwarfs. One of our Praesepe candidates, SDSS J083231.87+202700.0 (SDSS 0832), which was observed with EFOSC2 on NTT, and was found to have a common PM with a K3 giant Cancri. The distances of each companion in nine common PM pairs are measured, and distances of companions in each of these pairs are consistent with a binary nature. The statistical probabilities they are random line of sight contamination that have common PMs are all very low (1.07 × 10−5 by average) have common PMs by random chance are all very low, and we thus conclude that these systems are all genuine associations [4]. Figure 1 shows the PMs and distances of these nine binaries. Four of these binaries have projected separations between 300–1000 AU, four between 2000–3000 AU, and one 15000 AU. Figure 2 shows the J band spectrum of SDSS 0832. 06014-p.2 Research, Science and Technology of Brown Dwarfs and Exoplanets Figure 2. Gemini/NIRI spectrum of Cancri B (red). The error spectrum is plotted in gray. The spectrum of 2MASS 0028 (black) is over ploted, its spectral type in NIR is L3 and in optical is L4.5. Figure 3. JHK absolute magnitudes and colors of unresolved L+T binaries. Different lines represent absolute magnitudes and colors of L dwarf primaries (L1–L9, from top to bottom in left panel) without or with different T companions (T0–T8). If Cancri B (black square) is actually an unresolved binary, then the constituents would likely be made up of an L4 + a T4 dwarf. 06014-p.3 EPJ Web of Conferences 4. ETA CANCRI AB With a separation of 15019 AU, Cancri AB is an extremely wide binary, however, it is a statistically solid association, with the two components presumably having a common composition and age. Cancri A is a bright K3 giant with a V band magnitude of 5.33 at a distance of 91.5 pc [9]. It’s parameters have been measured by various groups [10–13]: [Fe/H] = 0.10 ± 0.08, Mass = 1.50 ± 0.1 M. We have used these properties to constrain the age of Cancri A by comparison to evolutionary tracks. In this way the evolutionary models [14] lead to an age constraint of 2.2–3.8 Gyrs. Using the MJHK – spectral type relations [15] we thus estimate that its spectral type must be L3-4 if it is a single L dwarf. With these magnitudes and an age from Cancri A the evolutionary models [16] −2 predict that M = 68–72 MJ , Teff = 1920 ± 100 K and log (g/cms ) = 5.33–5.35. Cancri B has bluer color than normal early L dwarfs. We investigated the possibility that the colors of Cancri B may result from unresolved binarity. T dwarfs have slightly bluer Y − J and significantly bluer J − H and J − K than L dwarfs [17, 18]. Combining the light of an L and T dwarf could thus result in these colors being bluer than those of a single L dwarf. We experimented with a variety of L + T combinations and used the spectral type – MJHK relations [15] to provide absolute magnitudes which we flux-combined to give unresolved color magnitude predictions. We found that an L4 + T4 unresolved combination through SED fitting would have colors and magnitudes very similar to those of Cancri B. Figure 3 shows the JHK absolute magnitudes and colors of unresolved L + T binaries. References [1] Pinfield D.J., Jones H.R.A., Lucas P.W. et al., MNRAS 368 (2006) 1281 [2] Abazajian K.N. et al., ApJS 182 (2009) 543 [3] Zhang Z.H., Pokorny R.S., Jones H.R.A. et al., A&A 497 (2009) 619 [4] Zhang Z.H., Pinfield D.J., Day-Jones A.C. et al., MNRAS 404 (2010) 1817 [5] Skrutskie M.F. et al., AJ 131 (2006) 1163 [6] Lawrence A.
Recommended publications
  • FY13 High-Level Deliverables
    National Optical Astronomy Observatory Fiscal Year Annual Report for FY 2013 (1 October 2012 – 30 September 2013) Submitted to the National Science Foundation Pursuant to Cooperative Support Agreement No. AST-0950945 13 December 2013 Revised 18 September 2014 Contents NOAO MISSION PROFILE .................................................................................................... 1 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................ 2 2 NOAO ACCOMPLISHMENTS ....................................................................................... 4 2.1 Achievements ..................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Status of Vision and Goals ................................................................................. 5 2.2.1 Status of FY13 High-Level Deliverables ............................................ 5 2.2.2 FY13 Planned vs. Actual Spending and Revenues .............................. 8 2.3 Challenges and Their Impacts ............................................................................ 9 3 SCIENTIFIC ACTIVITIES AND FINDINGS .............................................................. 11 3.1 Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory ....................................................... 11 3.2 Kitt Peak National Observatory ....................................................................... 14 3.3 Gemini Observatory ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Zone Eight-Earth-Mass Planet K2-18 B
    LETTERS https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-019-0878-9 Water vapour in the atmosphere of the habitable- zone eight-Earth-mass planet K2-18 b Angelos Tsiaras *, Ingo P. Waldmann *, Giovanna Tinetti , Jonathan Tennyson and Sergey N. Yurchenko In the past decade, observations from space and the ground planet within the star’s habitable zone (~0.12–0.25 au) (ref. 20), with have found water to be the most abundant molecular species, effective temperature between 200 K and 320 K, depending on the after hydrogen, in the atmospheres of hot, gaseous extrasolar albedo and the emissivity of its surface and/or its atmosphere. This planets1–5. Being the main molecular carrier of oxygen, water crude estimate accounts for neither possible tidal energy sources21 is a tracer of the origin and the evolution mechanisms of plan- nor atmospheric heat redistribution11,13, which might be relevant for ets. For temperate, terrestrial planets, the presence of water this planet. Measurements of the mass and the radius of K2-18 b 22 is of great importance as an indicator of habitable conditions. (planetary mass Mp = 7.96 ± 1.91 Earth masses (M⊕) (ref. ), plan- 19 Being small and relatively cold, these planets and their atmo- etary radius Rp = 2.279 ± 0.0026 R⊕ (ref. )) yield a bulk density of spheres are the most challenging to observe, and therefore no 3.3 ± 1.2 g cm−1 (ref. 22), suggesting either a silicate planet with an 6 atmospheric spectral signatures have so far been detected . extended atmosphere or an interior composition with a water (H2O) Super-Earths—planets lighter than ten Earth masses—around mass fraction lower than 50% (refs.
    [Show full text]
  • Carnegie Astronomical Telescopes in the 21St Century
    YEAR BOOK02/03 2002–2003 CARNEGIEINSTITUTIONOFWASHINGTON tel 202.387.6400 CARNEGIE INSTITUTION 1530 P Street, NW CARNEGIE INSTITUTION fax 202.387.8092 OF WASHINGTON OF WASHINGTON Washington, DC 20005 web site www.CarnegieInstitution.org New Horizons for Science YEAR BOOK 02/03 2002-2003 Year Book 02/03 THE PRESIDENT’ S REPORT July 1, — June 30, CARNEGIE INSTITUTION OF WASHINGTON ABOUT CARNEGIE Department of Embryology 115 West University Parkway Baltimore, MD 21210-3301 410.554.1200 . TO ENCOURAGE, IN THE BROADEST AND MOST LIBERAL MANNER, INVESTIGATION, Geophysical Laboratory 5251 Broad Branch Rd., N.W. RESEARCH, AND DISCOVERY, AND THE Washington, DC 20015-1305 202.478.8900 APPLICATION OF KNOWLEDGE TO THE IMPROVEMENT OF MANKIND . Department of Global Ecology 260 Panama St. Stanford, CA 94305-4101 The Carnegie Institution of Washington 650.325.1521 The Carnegie Observatories was incorporated with these words in 1902 813 Santa Barbara St. by its founder, Andrew Carnegie. Since Pasadena, CA 91101-1292 626.577.1122 then, the institution has remained true to Las Campanas Observatory its mission. At six research departments Casilla 601 La Serena, Chile across the country, the scientific staff and Department of Plant Biology a constantly changing roster of students, 260 Panama St. Stanford, CA 94305-4101 postdoctoral fellows, and visiting investiga- 650.325.1521 tors tackle fundamental questions on the Department of Terrestrial Magnetism frontiers of biology, earth sciences, and 5241 Broad Branch Rd., N.W. Washington, DC 20015-1305 astronomy.
    [Show full text]
  • Planet Populations As a Function of Stellar Properties
    Planet Populations as a Function of Stellar Properties Gijs D. Mulders Abstract Exoplanets around different types of stars provide a window into the diverse environments in which planets form. This chapter describes the observed re- lations between exoplanet populations and stellar properties and how they connect to planet formation in protoplanetary disks. Giant planets occur more frequently around more metal-rich and more massive stars. These findings support the core ac- cretion theory of planet formation, in which the cores of giant planets form more rapidly in more metal-rich and more massive protoplanetary disks. Smaller planets, those with sizes roughly between Earth and Neptune, exhibit different scaling rela- tions with stellar properties. These planets are found around stars with a wide range of metallicities and occur more frequently around lower mass stars. This indicates that planet formation takes place in a wide range of environments, yet it is not clear why planets form more efficiently around low mass stars. Going forward, exoplanet surveys targeting M dwarfs will characterize the exoplanet population around the lowest mass stars. In combination with ongoing stellar characterization, this will help us understand the formation of planets in a large range of environments. Introduction Exoplanets are observed around a diverse set of host stars. The first exoplanet dis- covered around a main-sequence star, 51 Pegasi b, orbits a star enriched in heavy elements (metals) compared to the sun (Mayor and Queloz 1995). In contrast, one of the earliest discovered planets that could conceivably be rocky, Gliese 581e, orbits a metal-poor M dwarf less than a third the mass of the sun (Mayor et al.
    [Show full text]
  • The Universe Contents 3 HD 149026 B
    History . 64 Antarctica . 136 Utopia Planitia . 209 Umbriel . 286 Comets . 338 In Popular Culture . 66 Great Barrier Reef . 138 Vastitas Borealis . 210 Oberon . 287 Borrelly . 340 The Amazon Rainforest . 140 Titania . 288 C/1861 G1 Thatcher . 341 Universe Mercury . 68 Ngorongoro Conservation Jupiter . 212 Shepherd Moons . 289 Churyamov- Orientation . 72 Area . 142 Orientation . 216 Gerasimenko . 342 Contents Magnetosphere . 73 Great Wall of China . 144 Atmosphere . .217 Neptune . 290 Hale-Bopp . 343 History . 74 History . 218 Orientation . 294 y Halle . 344 BepiColombo Mission . 76 The Moon . 146 Great Red Spot . 222 Magnetosphere . 295 Hartley 2 . 345 In Popular Culture . 77 Orientation . 150 Ring System . 224 History . 296 ONIS . 346 Caloris Planitia . 79 History . 152 Surface . 225 In Popular Culture . 299 ’Oumuamua . 347 In Popular Culture . 156 Shoemaker-Levy 9 . 348 Foreword . 6 Pantheon Fossae . 80 Clouds . 226 Surface/Atmosphere 301 Raditladi Basin . 81 Apollo 11 . 158 Oceans . 227 s Ring . 302 Swift-Tuttle . 349 Orbital Gateway . 160 Tempel 1 . 350 Introduction to the Rachmaninoff Crater . 82 Magnetosphere . 228 Proteus . 303 Universe . 8 Caloris Montes . 83 Lunar Eclipses . .161 Juno Mission . 230 Triton . 304 Tempel-Tuttle . 351 Scale of the Universe . 10 Sea of Tranquility . 163 Io . 232 Nereid . 306 Wild 2 . 352 Modern Observing Venus . 84 South Pole-Aitken Europa . 234 Other Moons . 308 Crater . 164 Methods . .12 Orientation . 88 Ganymede . 236 Oort Cloud . 353 Copernicus Crater . 165 Today’s Telescopes . 14. Atmosphere . 90 Callisto . 238 Non-Planetary Solar System Montes Apenninus . 166 How to Use This Book 16 History . 91 Objects . 310 Exoplanets . 354 Oceanus Procellarum .167 Naming Conventions . 18 In Popular Culture .
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Season Optical Modulation Phased with the Orbit of the Super-Earth 55 Cancri E S
    A&A 631, A129 (2019) Astronomy https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201936066 & © ESO 2019 Astrophysics Multi-season optical modulation phased with the orbit of the super-Earth 55 Cancri e S. Sulis1, D. Dragomir2,3, M. Lendl1,4, V. Bourrier4, B. O. Demory5, L. Fossati1, P. E. Cubillos1, D. B. Guenther6, S. R. Kane7, R. Kuschnig8, J. M. Matthews9, A. F. J. Moffat10, J. F. Rowe11, D. Sasselov12, W. W. Weiss8, and J. N. Winn13 1 Space Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Schmiedlstraße 6, 8042 Graz, Austria e-mail: [email protected] 2 Department of Physics and Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA 3 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA 4 Observatoire de l’Université de Genève, 51 chemin des Maillettes, 1290 Sauverny, Switzerland 5 University of Bern, Center for Space and Habitability, Sidlerstraße 5, 3012 Bern, Switzerland 6 Institute for Computational Astrophysics, Department of Astronomy and Physics, Saint Mary’s University, Halifax, NS B3H 3C3, Canada 7 Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA 8 Institut für Astronomie, Universität Wien Türkenschanzstrasse 17, 1180 Wien, Austria 9 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of British Columbia, 6224 Agricultural Road, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z1, Canada 10 Observatoire Astronomique du Mont Mégantic, Departement de Physique, Université de Montréal C. P. 6128, Succursale: Centre-Ville, Montréal, QC H3C 3J7, Canada 11 NAS Ames Research Park, Mail Stop 244-30, Moffett Field, CA 94035-1000, USA 12 Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 102138, USA 13 Department of Astrophysical Sciences, Princeton University, 4 Ivy Lane, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA Received 11 June 2019 / Accepted 24 September 2019 ABSTRACT Context.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Rotation Arund the Axis on the Stars, Galaxy and Rotation of Universe* Weitter Duckss1
    Effects of Rotation Arund the Axis on the Stars, Galaxy and Rotation of Universe* Weitter Duckss1 1Independent Researcher, Zadar, Croatia *Project: https://www.svemir-ipaksevrti.com/Universe-and-rotation.html; (https://www.svemir-ipaksevrti.com/) Abstract: The article analyzes the blueshift of the objects, through realized measurements of galaxies, mergers and collisions of galaxies and clusters of galaxies and measurements of different galactic speeds, where the closer galaxies move faster than the significantly more distant ones. The clusters of galaxies are analyzed through their non-zero value rotations and gravitational connection of objects inside a cluster, supercluster or a group of galaxies. The constant growth of objects and systems is visible through the constant influx of space material to Earth and other objects inside our system, through percussive craters, scattered around the system, collisions and mergers of objects, galaxies and clusters of galaxies. Atom and its formation, joining into pairs, growth and disintegration are analyzed through atoms of the same values of structure, different aggregate states and contiguous atoms of different aggregate states. The disintegration of complex atoms is followed with the temperature increase above the boiling point of atoms and compounds. The effects of rotation around an axis are analyzed from the small objects through stars, galaxies, superclusters and to the rotation of Universe. The objects' speeds of rotation and their effects are analyzed through the formation and appearance of a system (the formation of orbits, the asteroid belt, gas disk, the appearance of galaxies), its influence on temperature, surface gravity, the force of a magnetic field, the size of a radius.
    [Show full text]
  • Extrasolar Planets and Their Host Stars
    Kaspar von Braun & Tabetha S. Boyajian Extrasolar Planets and Their Host Stars July 25, 2017 arXiv:1707.07405v1 [astro-ph.EP] 24 Jul 2017 Springer Preface In astronomy or indeed any collaborative environment, it pays to figure out with whom one can work well. From existing projects or simply conversations, research ideas appear, are developed, take shape, sometimes take a detour into some un- expected directions, often need to be refocused, are sometimes divided up and/or distributed among collaborators, and are (hopefully) published. After a number of these cycles repeat, something bigger may be born, all of which one then tries to simultaneously fit into one’s head for what feels like a challenging amount of time. That was certainly the case a long time ago when writing a PhD dissertation. Since then, there have been postdoctoral fellowships and appointments, permanent and adjunct positions, and former, current, and future collaborators. And yet, con- versations spawn research ideas, which take many different turns and may divide up into a multitude of approaches or related or perhaps unrelated subjects. Again, one had better figure out with whom one likes to work. And again, in the process of writing this Brief, one needs create something bigger by focusing the relevant pieces of work into one (hopefully) coherent manuscript. It is an honor, a privi- lege, an amazing experience, and simply a lot of fun to be and have been working with all the people who have had an influence on our work and thereby on this book. To quote the late and great Jim Croce: ”If you dig it, do it.
    [Show full text]
  • Ian J. M. Crossfield Appointments & Experience Education
    Ian J. M. Crossfield http://www.mit.edu/∼iancross/ Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Physics Department [email protected] MIT Kavli Institute +1 949 923-0578 (USA) 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139 Appointments & Experience MIT Department of Physics Assistant Professor 07/2017- present • Discovery of new planets using TESS, studying planets' atmospheres using HST and ground-based tele- scopes, new isotopic measurements of cool dwarfs. University of California, Santa Cruz Adjunct Professor 12/2017- present Associate Researcher 06/2017- 07/2017 Sagan Fellow 08/2016- 05/2016 • Continued the discovery of new planets using K2 and characterizing their atmospheres with ground- and space-based telescopes. U. Arizona, Lunar and Planetary Lab Sagan Fellow 07/2014 - 08/2016 • Work to understand hazy atmospheres of extrasolar objects: cloud properties and molecular abundances in known `super-Earth' planets; discovering new transiting planets with the K2 mission. Max Planck Institut f¨urAstronomie Postdoctoral Fellow 07/2012 - 06/2014 • Extrasolar planet atmosphere characterization via transits and secondary eclipses from ground- and space-based observatories. High-resolution spectroscopy of nearby brown dwarfs. University of California, Los Angeles Graduate Studies 09/2007 - 06/2012 • Characterization of exoplanet atmospheres via phase curves, secondary eclipses, and transits. Refined parameters of known transiting planets via optical transit photometry. NASA/Jet Propulsion Laboratory Systems Engineer 07/2004 - 06/2007 • High-contrast instrument performance simulations for the Gemini Planet Imager and TMT Planet For- mation Instrument. Optical testbed work for the Space Interferometry Mission. Exoplanet science. Education University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California USA • Ph.D., Astrophysics (Dissertation Year Fellow), 06/2012 Advisor: Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Habitability of Our Universe
    Chapter for the book Consolidation of Fine Tuning On the Habitability of Our Universe Abraham Loeb Astronomy department, Harvard University, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. Is life most likely to emerge at the present cosmic time near a star like the Sun? We consider the habitability of the Universe throughout cosmic history, and conservatively restrict our attention to the context of “life as we know it” and the standard cosmological model, ΛCDM. The habitable cosmic epoch started shortly after the first stars formed, about 30 Myr after the Big Bang, and will end about 10 Tyr from now, when all stars will die. We review the formation history of habitable planets and find that unless habitability around low mass stars is suppressed, life is most likely to exist near ∼ 0.1M stars ten trillion years from now. Spectroscopic searches for biosignatures in the atmospheres of transiting Earth-mass planets around low mass stars will determine whether present-day life is indeed premature or typical from a cosmic perspective. arXiv:1606.08926v1 [astro-ph.CO] 29 Jun 2016 Contents 1 Introduction2 2 The Habitable Epoch of the Early Universe2 2.1 Section Background2 2.2 First Planets3 2.3 Section Summary and Implications4 3 CEMP stars: possible hosts to carbon planets in the early universe5 3.1 Section Background5 3.2 Star-forming environment of CEMP stars6 3.3 Orbital Radii of Potential Carbon Planets8 3.4 Mass-Radius Relationship for Carbon Planets 12 3.5 Transit Properties 14 3.6 Section Summary and
    [Show full text]
  • Five Planets Orbiting 55 Cancri1
    Five Planets Orbiting 55 Cancri1 Debra A. Fischer2, Geoffrey W. Marcy3, R. Paul Butler4, Steven S. Vogt5, Greg Laughlin5, Gregory W. Henry6, David Abouav2, Kathryn M. G. Peek3, Jason T. Wright3, John A. Johnson3, Chris McCarthy2, Howard Isaacson2 [email protected] ABSTRACT We report 18 years of Doppler shift measurements of a nearby star, 55 Can- cri, that exhibit strong evidence for five orbiting planets. The four previously reported planets are strongly confirmed here. A fifth planet is presented, with an apparent orbital period of 260 days, placing it 0.78 AU from the star in the large empty zone between two other planets. The velocity wobble amplitude of −1 4.9 m s implies a minimum planet mass M sin i = 45.7 MEarth. The orbital eccentricity is consistent with a circular orbit, but modest eccentricity solutions 2 give similar χν fits. All five planets reside in low eccentricity orbits, four having eccentricities under 0.1. The outermost planet orbits 5.8 AU from the star and has a minimum mass, M sin i = 3.8 MJup, making it more massive than the inner four planets combined. Its orbital distance is the largest for an exoplanet with a well defined orbit. The innermost planet has a semi-major axis of only 0.038 AU and has a minimum mass, M sin i, of only 10.8 MEarth, one of the lowest mass exoplanets known. The five known planets within 6 AU define a minimum mass 1Based on observations obtained at the W.M. Keck Observatory, which is operated jointly by the Uni- versity of California and the California Institute of Technology.
    [Show full text]
  • The-Universe-1-Preview.Pdf
    Comets . 324 Luyten’s Star . 408 . p00 Large and Small Shapley supercluster . 532 Borrellu . 330 Osiris . 409 Omega Centauri cluster . Magellanic “Clouds” . p00 Southern supercluster . 533 The C/1861 G1 Thatcher . 332 Proxima Centauri . 410 . p00 Malin 1 galaxy . p00 Vela supercluster . 534 Churyamov G . 334 PSO J318 5-22. 411 Orion Nebula . p00 Markarian 231 . p00 Universe EH1 . .. 336 Ross 128 . 412 Owl Nebula . p00 M77 . p00 Universe structure . 536 Hale-Bopp . .. 338 Tau Ceti . 413 Pleiades . p00 M81 (Bode’s galaxy) . p00 Contents Halley . 340 Trappist 1 . 414 Polaris . p00 M82 . p00 Cosmic web . 542 Hartley . 342 WASP 121-b . 418 Procyon . p00 M87 . p00 ISON . .344 Wolf 1061 . 422 RCW 86 . p00 Mayall’s Object . p00 CfA2 Great Wall . 546 'Oumuamua . 346 Regulus . p00 NGC 1512 . p00 Hercules Great Wall . .. 548 Show-maker-Levy . 348 Stellar Objects . 426 RX J0806 4-4123. p00 NGC 3370 . p00 Swft-Tuttle . 350 1E 2259+586 . 434 Rigel . p00 Occulting Pair . p00 Conclusion . 550 Temple . 352 3C 273 . 435 Rigel A . p00 Pinwheel Galaxy (M101) . Introduction . 04 Temple-Tuttle . 354 Achernar . 436 Rigel B . p00 . p00 Glossary . 590 Wild 2 . .. 356 Aldebaran . 437 Ring Nebula . p00 Sagittarius Dwarf . p00 The Solar System . 20 Algol . 438 Rosette Nebula . p00 Sculpture Galaxy . p00 Index . 600 Beyond the Solar System . Alpha Centauri A . 439 Sagittarius A* . p00 Sombrero Galaxy . p00 The Sun . 24 . 358 Alpha Centauri B . 440 SAO 206462 . p00 Sunflower galaxy . p00 Mercury . 50 Altair . 441 SDSSJ0927+2943 . p00 Tadpole galaxy . p00 Venus . 80 Exoplanets . .. 364 Antares . 442 SGR 1806-20 . p00 Triangulum Galaxy .
    [Show full text]