55 Cancri: Stellar Astrophysical Parameters, a Planet in the Habitable Zone, and Implications for the Radius of a Transiting Super-Earth

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

The Astrophysical Journal, 740:49 (6pp), 2011 October 10 doi:10.1088/0004-637X/740/1/49 C 2011. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. 55 CANCRI: STELLAR ASTROPHYSICAL PARAMETERS, A PLANET IN THE HABITABLE ZONE, AND IMPLICATIONS FOR THE RADIUS OF A TRANSITING SUPER-EARTH Kaspar von Braun1, Tabetha S. Boyajian2,10, Theo A. ten Brummelaar3, Stephen R. Kane1, Gerard T. van Belle4, David R. Ciardi1, Sean N. Raymond5,6, Mercedes Lopez-Morales´ 7,8, Harold A. McAlister2, Gail Schaefer3, Stephen T. Ridgway9, Laszlo Sturmann3, Judit Sturmann3, Russel White2, Nils H. Turner3, Chris Farrington3, and P. J. Goldfinger3 1 NASA Exoplanet Science Institute, California Institute of Technology, MC 100-22, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA; [email protected] 2 Center for High Angular Resolution Astronomy and Department of Physics and Astronomy, Georgia State University, P. O. Box 4106, Atlanta, GA 30302-4106, USA 3 The CHARA Array, Mount Wilson Observatory, Mount Wilson, CA 91023, USA 4 European Southern Observatory, Karl-Schwarzschild-Str. 2, 85748 Garching, Germany 5 Universite´ de Bordeaux, Observatoire Aquitain des Sciences de l’Univers, 2 rue de l’Observatoire, BP 89, F-33271 Floirac Cedex, France 6 CNRS, UMR 5804, Laboratoire d’Astrophysique de Bordeaux, 2 rue de l’Observatoire, BP 89, F-33271 Floirac Cedex, France 7 Institut de Ciencies` de L’Espai (CSIC-IEEC), Campus UAB, Facultat Ciencies,` Torre C5 parell 2, 08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain 8 Department of Terrestrial Magnetism, Carnegie Institution of Washington, 5241 Broad Branch Road, NW, Washington, DC 20015, USA 9 National Optical Astronomy Observatory, P. O. Box 26732, Tucson, AZ 85726-6732, USA Received 2011 June 1; accepted 2011 July 22; published 2011 September 26 ABSTRACT The bright star 55 Cancri is known to host five planets, including a transiting super-Earth. The study presented here yields directly determined values for 55 Cnc’s stellar astrophysical parameters based on improved interferometry: R = 0.943 ± 0.010 R, TEFF = 5196 ± 24 K. We use isochrone fitting to determine 55 Cnc’s age to be 10.2 ± 2.5 Gyr, implying a stellar mass of 0.905 ± 0.015 M. Our analysis of the location and extent of the system’s habitable zone (HZ; 0.67–1.32 AU) shows that planet f, with period ∼260 days and M sin i = 0.155 MJupiter, spends the majority of the duration of its elliptical orbit in the circumstellar HZ. Though planet f is too massive to harbor liquid water on any planetary surface, we elaborate on the potential of alternative low-mass objects in planet f’s vicinity: a large moon and a low-mass planet on a dynamically stable orbit within the HZ. Finally, our direct value for 55 Cancri’s stellar radius allows for a model-independent calculation of the physical diameter of the transiting super-Earth 55 Cnc e (∼2.05 ± 0.15 R⊕), which, depending on the planetary mass assumed, implies a bulk density of 0.76 ρ⊕ or 1.07 ρ⊕. Key words: infrared: stars – planetary systems – stars: fundamental parameters – stars: individual (55 Cnc) – stars: late-type – techniques: interferometric Online-only material: color figure 1. INTRODUCTION 2. Based on the equations relating stellar luminosity to the location and extent of a stellar system’s habitable zone (HZ; 55 Cancri (= HD 75732 = ρ Cancri; 55 Cnc hereafter) is a late Jones & Sleep 2010), planet 55 Cnc f falls within 55 Cnc’s G/early K dwarf/subgiant (Gray et al. 2003) currently known traditional circumstellar HZ. to host five extrasolar planets with periods between around Apart from values derived from stellar modeling (Fischer et al. 0.7 days and 14 years and minimum masses between 0.026 and 2008), there are two direct (interferometric) stellar diameter 3.84 MJupiter (Dawson & Fabrycky 2010). These planets were determinations of 55 Cnc: R = 1.15 ± 0.035 R in Baines all discovered via the radial velocity method and successively et al. (2008) and R = 1.1 ± 0.096 R in van Belle & von announced in Butler et al. (1997), Marcy et al. (2002), McArthur Braun (2009). Note, however, that van Belle & von Braun et al. (2004), and Fischer et al. (2008). (2009) report, in their Sections 5.1 and 5.4.1, the fact that Astrophysical insights on two of the currently known planets R ∼ 1.1 R makes 55 Cnc a statistical outlier in their fitted in the 55 Cnc system are direct consequences of the determina- TEFF = f ((V − K)0) relation (see their Section 5.1). In order tion of the stellar radius and surface temperature. not to be an outlier, 55 Cnc’s angular diameter would have to be 1. Elimination of period aliasing and the consequently up- 0.7 milliarcseconds (mas), corresponding to 0.94 R. dated orbital scenario presented in Dawson & Fabrycky In this paper, we present new, high-precision interferometric (2010) motivated the recent, successful photometric tran- observations of 55 Cnc with the aim of providing a timely, sit detections of the super-Earth 55 Cnc e with a period directly determined value of the stellar diameter, which, when of 0.7 days by Winn et al. (2011) using Canadian Space combined with the flux decrement measured during planetary Mission Microvariability and Oscillations of Stars (MOST) transit, yields a direct value for the exoplanetary diameter. and, independently, by Demory et al. (2011)usingWarm Furthermore, the combination of angular stellar diameter and Spitzer. The calculation of planetary radii based on transit bolometric stellar flux provides directly determined stellar photometry relies, of course, on a measured or assumed surface temperature. The resultant stellar luminosity determines stellar radius. the location and extent of the circumstellar HZ, and we can ascertain which, if any, of the planets orbiting 55 Cnc spend 10 Hubble Fellow. any, all, or part of their orbits inside the HZ. 1 The Astrophysical Journal, 740:49 (6pp), 2011 October 10 von Braun et al. 0.70 1.2 0.65 1.0 0.8 0.60 0.6 Visibility 0.55 Visibility 0.4 0.50 0.2 0.45 0.0 0.06 0.4 0.04 0.02 0.2 0.00 0.0 -0.02 -0.04 -0.2 Residuals -0.06 Residuals -0.4 190 192 194 196 198 200 0 50 100 150 200 Baseline/Wavelength X 10-6 Baseline/Wavelength X 10-6 Figure 1. Calibrated visibility observations along with the limb-darkened angular diameter fit for 55 Cnc. The left panel shows the fit only based on the CHARA data presented in this work. For comparison with literature data sets, the right panel includes PTI data (shortest baseline) from van Belle & von Braun (2009), CHARA data from Baines et al. (2008; longer baseline), and data presented in this work (longest baseline), along with the same fit as in the left panel. The bottom panels show the residuals around the respective fit. Note the different scales for both x-andy-axes between the panels. For details, see Sections 2 and 3.1. The fit results are given in Table 1. Table 1 visibilities.11 During the observing period, we alternated be- Stellar Properties of 55 Cnc tween two point-source-like calibrators, both of which lie within Parameter Value Reference 5 deg on the sky from the target, to minimize the system- Spectral type K0 IV-V Gray et al. (2003) atic effects. These calibrator stars were HD 74811 (G2 IV; ± θEST = 0.407 ± 0.015 mas) and HD 75332 (F8 V; θEST = Parallax (mas) 81.03 0.75 van Leeuwen (2007) ± [Fe/H] 0.31 ± 0.04 Valenti & Fischer (2005) 0.401 0.014 mas). θEST corresponds the estimated angular θUD (mas) 0.685 ± 0.004 This work (Section 2) diameter of the calibrator stars based on spectral energy distri- θLD (mas) 0.711 ± 0.004 This work (Section 2) bution (SED) fitting. ± Radius (R) 0.943 0.010 This work (Section 3.1) The uniform disk and limb-darkened angular diameters θUD ± 12 Luminosity (L) 0.582 0.014 This work (Section 3.2) and θLD , respectively, are found by fitting our calibrated visi- ± TEFF (K) 5196 24 This work (Section 3.2) bility measurements to the respective functions for each relation Mass (M) 0.905 ± 0.015 This work (Section 3.3) (Hanbury Brown et al. 1974). Limb-darkening coefficients were ± Age (Gyr) 10.2 2.5 This work (Section 3.3) taken from Claret (2000). The data and fit for θ are shown in log g 4.45 ± 0.01 This work (Section 3.3) LD HZ boundaries (AU) 0.67–1.32 This work (Section 4) the left panel of Figure 1. Note. Directly determined and derived stellar parameters for the 55 Cnc system. 3. FUNDAMENTAL ASTROPHYSICAL PARAMETERS OF THE STAR 55 CANCRI We describe our observations in Section 2. The determination In this section, we discuss 55 Cnc’s stellar astrophysical of stellar astrophysical parameters is shown in Section 3.We properties. The results are summarized in Table 1. discuss 55 Cnc’s circumstellar HZ and the locations of the 3.1. Stellar Diameter orbiting planets with respect to it in Section 4. Section 5 contains the calculation of the radius of the transiting super-Earth 55 Cnc We examined the following two sets of literature interfero- e, and we conclude in Section 6. metric data in order to decide whether to include them in our analysis: CHARA data presented in Baines et al. (2008) and data published in van Belle & von Braun (2009) taken with the 2. INTERFEROMETRIC OBSERVATIONS Palomar Testbed Interferometer (PTI), which features a 110 m 13 Our observational strategy is described in detail in von Braun baseline compared to CHARA’s 330 m.
Recommended publications
  • Lurking in the Shadows: Wide-Separation Gas Giants As Tracers of Planet Formation

    Lurking in the Shadows: Wide-Separation Gas Giants As Tracers of Planet Formation

    Lurking in the Shadows: Wide-Separation Gas Giants as Tracers of Planet Formation Thesis by Marta Levesque Bryan In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Pasadena, California 2018 Defended May 1, 2018 ii © 2018 Marta Levesque Bryan ORCID: [0000-0002-6076-5967] All rights reserved iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost I would like to thank Heather Knutson, who I had the great privilege of working with as my thesis advisor. Her encouragement, guidance, and perspective helped me navigate many a challenging problem, and my conversations with her were a consistent source of positivity and learning throughout my time at Caltech. I leave graduate school a better scientist and person for having her as a role model. Heather fostered a wonderfully positive and supportive environment for her students, giving us the space to explore and grow - I could not have asked for a better advisor or research experience. I would also like to thank Konstantin Batygin for enthusiastic and illuminating discussions that always left me more excited to explore the result at hand. Thank you as well to Dimitri Mawet for providing both expertise and contagious optimism for some of my latest direct imaging endeavors. Thank you to the rest of my thesis committee, namely Geoff Blake, Evan Kirby, and Chuck Steidel for their support, helpful conversations, and insightful questions. I am grateful to have had the opportunity to collaborate with Brendan Bowler. His talk at Caltech my second year of graduate school introduced me to an unexpected population of massive wide-separation planetary-mass companions, and lead to a long-running collaboration from which several of my thesis projects were born.
  • Occurrence and Core-Envelope Structure of 1–4× Earth-Size Planets Around Sun-Like Stars

    Occurrence and Core-Envelope Structure of 1–4× Earth-Size Planets Around Sun-Like Stars

    Occurrence and core-envelope structure of 1–4× SPECIAL FEATURE Earth-size planets around Sun-like stars Geoffrey W. Marcya,1, Lauren M. Weissa, Erik A. Petiguraa, Howard Isaacsona, Andrew W. Howardb, and Lars A. Buchhavec aDepartment of Astronomy, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720; bInstitute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI 96822; and cHarvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138 Edited by Adam S. Burrows, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, and accepted by the Editorial Board April 16, 2014 (received for review January 24, 2014) Small planets, 1–4× the size of Earth, are extremely common planets. The Doppler reflex velocity of an Earth-size planet − around Sun-like stars, and surprisingly so, as they are missing in orbiting at 0.3 AU is only 0.2 m s 1, difficult to detect with an − our solar system. Recent detections have yielded enough informa- observational precision of 1 m s 1. However, such Earth-size tion about this class of exoplanets to begin characterizing their planets show up as a ∼10-sigma dimming of the host star after occurrence rates, orbits, masses, densities, and internal structures. coadding the brightness measurements from each transit. The Kepler mission finds the smallest planets to be most common, The occurrence rate of Earth-size planets is a major goal of as 26% of Sun-like stars have small, 1–2 R⊕ planets with orbital exoplanet science. With three years of Kepler photometry in periods under 100 d, and 11% have 1–2 R⊕ planets that receive 1–4× hand, two groups worked to account for the detection biases in the incident stellar flux that warms our Earth.
  • METEOR CSILLAGÁSZATI ÉVKÖNYV 2019 Meteor Csillagászati Évkönyv 2019

    METEOR CSILLAGÁSZATI ÉVKÖNYV 2019 Meteor Csillagászati Évkönyv 2019

    METEOR CSILLAGÁSZATI ÉVKÖNYV 2019 meteor csillagászati évkönyv 2019 Szerkesztette: Benkő József Mizser Attila Magyar Csillagászati Egyesület www.mcse.hu Budapest, 2018 Az évkönyv kalendárium részének összeállításában közreműködött: Tartalom Bagó Balázs Görgei Zoltán Kaposvári Zoltán Kiss Áron Keve Kovács József Bevezető ....................................................................................................... 7 Molnár Péter Sánta Gábor Kalendárium .............................................................................................. 13 Sárneczky Krisztián Szabadi Péter Cikkek Szabó Sándor Szőllősi Attila Zsoldos Endre: 100 éves a Nemzetközi Csillagászati Unió ........................191 Zsoldos Endre Maria Lugaro – Kereszturi Ákos: Elemkeletkezés a csillagokban.............. 203 Szabó Róbert: Az OGLE égboltfelmérés 25 éve ........................................218 A kalendárium csillagtérképei az Ursa Minor szoftverrel készültek. www.ursaminor.hu Beszámolók Mizser Attila: A Magyar Csillagászati Egyesület Szakmailag ellenőrizte: 2017. évi tevékenysége .........................................................................242 Szabados László Kiss László – Szabó Róbert: Az MTA CSFK Csillagászati Intézetének 2017. évi tevékenysége .........................................................................248 Petrovay Kristóf: Az ELTE Csillagászati Tanszékének működése 2017-ben ............................................................................ 262 Szabó M. Gyula: Az ELTE Gothard Asztrofi zikai Obszervatórium
  • 10. Scientific Programme 10.1

    10. Scientific Programme 10.1

    10. SCIENTIFIC PROGRAMME 10.1. OVERVIEW (a) Invited Discourses Plenary Hall B 18:00-19:30 ID1 “The Zoo of Galaxies” Karen Masters, University of Portsmouth, UK Monday, 20 August ID2 “Supernovae, the Accelerating Cosmos, and Dark Energy” Brian Schmidt, ANU, Australia Wednesday, 22 August ID3 “The Herschel View of Star Formation” Philippe André, CEA Saclay, France Wednesday, 29 August ID4 “Past, Present and Future of Chinese Astronomy” Cheng Fang, Nanjing University, China Nanjing Thursday, 30 August (b) Plenary Symposium Review Talks Plenary Hall B (B) 8:30-10:00 Or Rooms 309A+B (3) IAUS 288 Astrophysics from Antarctica John Storey (3) Mon. 20 IAUS 289 The Cosmic Distance Scale: Past, Present and Future Wendy Freedman (3) Mon. 27 IAUS 290 Probing General Relativity using Accreting Black Holes Andy Fabian (B) Wed. 22 IAUS 291 Pulsars are Cool – seriously Scott Ransom (3) Thu. 23 Magnetars: neutron stars with magnetic storms Nanda Rea (3) Thu. 23 Probing Gravitation with Pulsars Michael Kremer (3) Thu. 23 IAUS 292 From Gas to Stars over Cosmic Time Mordacai-Mark Mac Low (B) Tue. 21 IAUS 293 The Kepler Mission: NASA’s ExoEarth Census Natalie Batalha (3) Tue. 28 IAUS 294 The Origin and Evolution of Cosmic Magnetism Bryan Gaensler (B) Wed. 29 IAUS 295 Black Holes in Galaxies John Kormendy (B) Thu. 30 (c) Symposia - Week 1 IAUS 288 Astrophysics from Antartica IAUS 290 Accretion on all scales IAUS 291 Neutron Stars and Pulsars IAUS 292 Molecular gas, Dust, and Star Formation in Galaxies (d) Symposia –Week 2 IAUS 289 Advancing the Physics of Cosmic
  • FY13 High-Level Deliverables

    FY13 High-Level Deliverables

    National Optical Astronomy Observatory Fiscal Year Annual Report for FY 2013 (1 October 2012 – 30 September 2013) Submitted to the National Science Foundation Pursuant to Cooperative Support Agreement No. AST-0950945 13 December 2013 Revised 18 September 2014 Contents NOAO MISSION PROFILE .................................................................................................... 1 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................ 2 2 NOAO ACCOMPLISHMENTS ....................................................................................... 4 2.1 Achievements ..................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Status of Vision and Goals ................................................................................. 5 2.2.1 Status of FY13 High-Level Deliverables ............................................ 5 2.2.2 FY13 Planned vs. Actual Spending and Revenues .............................. 8 2.3 Challenges and Their Impacts ............................................................................ 9 3 SCIENTIFIC ACTIVITIES AND FINDINGS .............................................................. 11 3.1 Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory ....................................................... 11 3.2 Kitt Peak National Observatory ....................................................................... 14 3.3 Gemini Observatory ........................................................................................
  • Small Astronomy Calendar for Amateur Astronomers 2019

    Small Astronomy Calendar for Amateur Astronomers 2019

    IGAEF Small Astronomy Calendar for Amateur Astronomers 2019 C A L E N D A R F O R 2019 January February March Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 1 2 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 27 28 29 30 31 24 25 26 27 28 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 April May June Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 1 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 28 29 30 26 27 28 29 30 31 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 July August September Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 28 29 30 31 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 29 30 October November December Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 27 28 29 30 31 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 29 30 31 Easter Sunday: 2019 Apr 21 Phases of the Moon 2019 New Moon First Quarter Full Moon Last Quarter d h d h d h ⊕dist d h Jan 6 1.5 Jan 14 6.7 Jan 21
  • Binocular Challenges

    Binocular Challenges

    This page intentionally left blank Cosmic Challenge Listing more than 500 sky targets, both near and far, in 187 challenges, this observing guide will test novice astronomers and advanced veterans alike. Its unique mix of Solar System and deep-sky targets will have observers hunting for the Apollo lunar landing sites, searching for satellites orbiting the outermost planets, and exploring hundreds of star clusters, nebulae, distant galaxies, and quasars. Each target object is accompanied by a rating indicating how difficult the object is to find, an in-depth visual description, an illustration showing how the object realistically looks, and a detailed finder chart to help you find each challenge quickly and effectively. The guide introduces objects often overlooked in other observing guides and features targets visible in a variety of conditions, from the inner city to the dark countryside. Challenges are provided for viewing by the naked eye, through binoculars, to the largest backyard telescopes. Philip S. Harrington is the author of eight previous books for the amateur astronomer, including Touring the Universe through Binoculars, Star Ware, and Star Watch. He is also a contributing editor for Astronomy magazine, where he has authored the magazine’s monthly “Binocular Universe” column and “Phil Harrington’s Challenge Objects,” a quarterly online column on Astronomy.com. He is an Adjunct Professor at Dowling College and Suffolk County Community College, New York, where he teaches courses in stellar and planetary astronomy. Cosmic Challenge The Ultimate Observing List for Amateurs PHILIP S. HARRINGTON CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, Sao˜ Paulo, Delhi, Dubai, Tokyo, Mexico City Cambridge University Press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 8RU, UK Published in the United States of America by Cambridge University Press, New York www.cambridge.org Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9780521899369 C P.
  • From ESPRESSO to PLATO: Detecting and Characterizing Earth-Like Planets in the Presence of Stellar Noise

    From ESPRESSO to PLATO: Detecting and Characterizing Earth-Like Planets in the Presence of Stellar Noise

    From ESPRESSO to PLATO: detecting and characterizing Earth-like planets in the presence of stellar noise Tese de Doutouramento Luisa Maria Serrano Departamento de Fisica e Astronomia do Porto, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade do Porto Orientador: Nuno Cardoso Santos, Co-Orientadora: Susana Cristina Cabral Barros March 2020 Dedication This Ph.D. thesis is the result of 4 years of work, stress, anxiety, but, over all, fun, curiosity and desire of exploring the most hidden scientific discoveries deserved by Astrophysics. Working in Exoplanets was the beginning of the realization of a life-lasting dream, it has allowed me to enter an extremely active and productive group. For this reason my thanks go, first of all, to the ’boss’ and my Ph.D. supervisor, Nuno Santos. He allowed me to be here and introduced me in this world, a distant mirage for the master student from a university where there was no exoplanets thematic line. I also have to thank him for his humanity, not a common quality among professors. The second thank goes to Susana, who was always there for me when I had issues, not necessarily scientific ones. I finally have to thank Mahmoud; heis not listed as supervisor here, but he guided me, teaching me how to do research and giving me precious life lessons, which made me growing. There is also a long series of people I am thankful to, for rendering this years extremely interesting and sustaining me in the deepest moments. My first thought goes to my parents: they were thousands of kilometers far away from me, though they never left me alone and they listened to my complaints, joy, sadness...everything.
  • Zone Eight-Earth-Mass Planet K2-18 B

    Zone Eight-Earth-Mass Planet K2-18 B

    LETTERS https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-019-0878-9 Water vapour in the atmosphere of the habitable- zone eight-Earth-mass planet K2-18 b Angelos Tsiaras *, Ingo P. Waldmann *, Giovanna Tinetti , Jonathan Tennyson and Sergey N. Yurchenko In the past decade, observations from space and the ground planet within the star’s habitable zone (~0.12–0.25 au) (ref. 20), with have found water to be the most abundant molecular species, effective temperature between 200 K and 320 K, depending on the after hydrogen, in the atmospheres of hot, gaseous extrasolar albedo and the emissivity of its surface and/or its atmosphere. This planets1–5. Being the main molecular carrier of oxygen, water crude estimate accounts for neither possible tidal energy sources21 is a tracer of the origin and the evolution mechanisms of plan- nor atmospheric heat redistribution11,13, which might be relevant for ets. For temperate, terrestrial planets, the presence of water this planet. Measurements of the mass and the radius of K2-18 b 22 is of great importance as an indicator of habitable conditions. (planetary mass Mp = 7.96 ± 1.91 Earth masses (M⊕) (ref. ), plan- 19 Being small and relatively cold, these planets and their atmo- etary radius Rp = 2.279 ± 0.0026 R⊕ (ref. )) yield a bulk density of spheres are the most challenging to observe, and therefore no 3.3 ± 1.2 g cm−1 (ref. 22), suggesting either a silicate planet with an 6 atmospheric spectral signatures have so far been detected . extended atmosphere or an interior composition with a water (H2O) Super-Earths—planets lighter than ten Earth masses—around mass fraction lower than 50% (refs.
  • Elisa: Astrophysics and Cosmology in the Millihertz Regime Contents

    Elisa: Astrophysics and Cosmology in the Millihertz Regime Contents

    Doing science with eLISA: Astrophysics and cosmology in the millihertz regime Pau Amaro-Seoane1; 13, Sofiane Aoudia1, Stanislav Babak1, Pierre Binétruy2, Emanuele Berti3; 4, Alejandro Bohé5, Chiara Caprini6, Monica Colpi7, Neil J. Cornish8, Karsten Danzmann1, Jean-François Dufaux2, Jonathan Gair9, Oliver Jennrich10, Philippe Jetzer11, Antoine Klein11; 8, Ryan N. Lang12, Alberto Lobo13, Tyson Littenberg14; 15, Sean T. McWilliams16, Gijs Nelemans17; 18; 19, Antoine Petiteau2; 1, Edward K. Porter2, Bernard F. Schutz1, Alberto Sesana1, Robin Stebbins20, Tim Sumner21, Michele Vallisneri22, Stefano Vitale23, Marta Volonteri24; 25, and Henry Ward26 1Max Planck Institut für Gravitationsphysik (Albert-Einstein-Institut), Germany 2APC, Univ. Paris Diderot, CNRS/IN2P3, CEA/Irfu, Obs. de Paris, Sorbonne Paris Cité, France 3Department of Physics and Astronomy, The University of Mississippi, University, MS 38677, USA 4Division of Physics, Mathematics, and Astronomy, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena CA 91125, USA 5UPMC-CNRS, UMR7095, Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris, F-75014, Paris, France 6Institut de Physique Théorique, CEA, IPhT, CNRS, URA 2306, F-91191Gif/Yvette Cedex, France 7University of Milano Bicocca, Milano, I-20100, Italy 8Department of Physics, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA 9Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 0HA, UK 10ESA, Keplerlaan 1, 2200 AG Noordwijk, The Netherlands 11Institute of Theoretical Physics University of Zürich, Winterthurerstr. 190, 8057 Zürich Switzerland
  • Results Astronomical Observations

    Results Astronomical Observations

    R E S U L T S I RVAT ASTRONOM CAL OBSE IONS, MADE A T THE OBSERVATORY OF THE I E UN V RSITY, D U R H A M , N 184-6 TO UL 1848 FROMJA UARY, , J Y, , UN DEB THE DI RECTI O N O F L B . H E V . L L F T R . R E D . s TE M P E C H EV A I ER, , A _ PRO F B SO B O E A N D A STRO N O I Y I N THE UN I V ERS I TY O F DURHA M . R EV . N H N B . A . THE ROBERTA CHORT OMPSO , O BS ERV ER I N THE UN I V ERS I TY. D U R H A M PRIN D P HUMBLE. TED BY THE E! EC UTO RS O F E W . IN TRODUCTION . HE servat r of the niversi of Durham was built in 1841 rin T Ob oy U t , ci all y p p y h ubscri tion . The servati ns un er t e eneral su erint n byprivate s p Ob o , d g p e den ce of the r fess r of at ematics and str n m are c n uc e an O server P o o M h A oo y, od tdby b , Th f ll win a es c ntain the results resident at the Observatory . e oo gpg o of O bser ns ma e et ween anuar 1846 and ul 1848 .
  • Carnegie Astronomical Telescopes in the 21St Century

    Carnegie Astronomical Telescopes in the 21St Century

    YEAR BOOK02/03 2002–2003 CARNEGIEINSTITUTIONOFWASHINGTON tel 202.387.6400 CARNEGIE INSTITUTION 1530 P Street, NW CARNEGIE INSTITUTION fax 202.387.8092 OF WASHINGTON OF WASHINGTON Washington, DC 20005 web site www.CarnegieInstitution.org New Horizons for Science YEAR BOOK 02/03 2002-2003 Year Book 02/03 THE PRESIDENT’ S REPORT July 1, — June 30, CARNEGIE INSTITUTION OF WASHINGTON ABOUT CARNEGIE Department of Embryology 115 West University Parkway Baltimore, MD 21210-3301 410.554.1200 . TO ENCOURAGE, IN THE BROADEST AND MOST LIBERAL MANNER, INVESTIGATION, Geophysical Laboratory 5251 Broad Branch Rd., N.W. RESEARCH, AND DISCOVERY, AND THE Washington, DC 20015-1305 202.478.8900 APPLICATION OF KNOWLEDGE TO THE IMPROVEMENT OF MANKIND . Department of Global Ecology 260 Panama St. Stanford, CA 94305-4101 The Carnegie Institution of Washington 650.325.1521 The Carnegie Observatories was incorporated with these words in 1902 813 Santa Barbara St. by its founder, Andrew Carnegie. Since Pasadena, CA 91101-1292 626.577.1122 then, the institution has remained true to Las Campanas Observatory its mission. At six research departments Casilla 601 La Serena, Chile across the country, the scientific staff and Department of Plant Biology a constantly changing roster of students, 260 Panama St. Stanford, CA 94305-4101 postdoctoral fellows, and visiting investiga- 650.325.1521 tors tackle fundamental questions on the Department of Terrestrial Magnetism frontiers of biology, earth sciences, and 5241 Broad Branch Rd., N.W. Washington, DC 20015-1305 astronomy.