DOCSLIB.ORG

Cumulative Subject Index Volumes 1–25 (Contains Links to Entries) ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

European Review of Social Psychology Cumulative Subject Index Volumes 1–25 (contains links to entries) ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ Locators in bold refer to figures/tables goal-based explanations (12) 201–235 – Action control, behavioural intentions Ability, praise and criticism (3) 259 283 (12) 21 Abnormal conditions focus model (2) 59–61 – Action control, emotion regulation (23) Aboriginal Peoples, Canada (24) 15 16 146–156 Absentminded relapses (22) 20 Action initiation, implementation intentions Abstract language use (25) see Linguistic (4) 166–171 abstraction Action readiness (22) 116, 117; (22) 153 Abstract modelling, indirect intergroup Action for social change (24) 244 contact (25) 319, 375 Action-oriented personality factors (24) 146, Abstract reasoning (22) 169 146–147 Abstraction, intragroup variability (7) – Action tendencies, conflict resolution (25) 4, 111 113 9–10, 18 Abu Ghraib, prisoners (24) 2 Activation of attitudes (24) 270–273 Academic personnel selection (25) see Actor effects (22) 367, 369 Personnel selection Actor perspective, positive–negative Academic procrastination (24) 155, 156 asymmetry (1) 38–39 Access consciousness (22) 8–9 – – Actor observer bias Access dissociations (22) 4, 10 17 agent vs. recipient (16) 182–184 Acceptance of death, terror management – linguistic category model (LCM) (2) theory (25) 57, 58 59 17–18 Accessible knowledge prediction (6) 13–16 meta-cognition (22) 185–186 – Actor-Partner Interdependence Model priming (22) 183 185 (APIM) (22) 350; (22) 367 Accessibility of thoughts Acute stress paradigm (23) 32 aggressive (25) 88, 93, 95 – – Adherence to treatment, healthcare disparities death-related (25) 36 37, 48 50 (24) 81, 83–84, 86–87 Acculturation (23) 93; (25) 156 Adjectives, linguistic category model and citizenship (25) 153 (25) 266 indirect intergroup contact (25) 351 Advantaged-groups, perceptions (24) and national identity (25) 215–216 – – 217 218 Achievement (23) 9 10, 18 Adjustment process (16) 354–357 Achievement behaviour, attributional – – Adolescence analysis (13) 220 221, 234 238 media use (25) 72, 74–75, see also Media Acquisition of attitudes (24) 267–270 – violence Act rationalization (8) 10 15 national identification (25) 207 Action – Adolescence, self-concept and social attitudes (18) 108 119 categorization (3) 285–308 attributional models (13) 223–225 1 2 SUBJECT INDEX Advertising, humour (24) see Humour in Affective–cognitive inconsistency, meeting advertising the handicapped (1) 323–338 Advocacy, intergroup forgiveness (24) 9–10, Affect-outcomes relationship, 11 implementation intentions (23) 168–170 Affect Affiliation, under stress (1) 304–307; (5) attention (8) 71–73 215–231 attitude (8) 33–66; (10) 78–92;(11)2–3 Affirmative action (24) 203 attitude–behaviour models (8) 38–44 Affordances, behavioural variability (18) attributions (3) 194–196 286–287 behaviour (22) 11–13 Afghanistan (24) 2, 6, 17–21, 20, 26 core affect (20) 236 Afghanistan National Police (ANP) (24) 17, crossed categorization (13) 44–45, 51–56, 18–19, 20 62–64 Afterlife (25) see Immortality decision-making (8) 33–66 Age of apology (24) 1, see also Intergroup deservingness (17) 63–64 forgiveness discrimination interpretation (14) 295 Ageism (24) 197 emotions and (22) 117 Age-related attitudes, IAT (18) 45–51 fluency–affect intuition model (FAIM) Age-related differences (22) 279–302 attitudes and stereotyping (18) 67–69 fluency-induced (22) 280, 290–293 feedback and perceived ability (3) heuristic and systematic processing (6) 277–279 44–49 Aggression (23) 107, 109–110 infusion (22) 119 accessibility (23) 120–124, 126–127 interpersonal preferences (3) 196–200 activation-inhibition (23) 115–116 judgemental cue (22) 294–295 catharsis (23) 117–119 memory (20) 280–284 direct emotion regulation (25) 6, 8 motivation (16) 257–300; (20) 359–369, media violence (23) 228–229 372–373 and media use (25) 73, 87, 84–88, 93, 95 person perception (20) 208–210 related constructs (23) 119–124 prejudice (10) 79–84; (16) 129–131 suppression (23) 127–131, 134 priming (22) 119 violent computer games (23) 131–133, psychological consequences (22) 15–16 247 reattribution (22) 294–295, 296 see also Anger; Media violence responses to dehumanised people (20) Aggression, historiometry (9) 276–278 214–215 Aggression, inhibition (24) 163, see also social perception (3) 183–223 Morality stereotyping (22) 227 Aging, social comparison (12) 291–293 stimulus evaluation (22) 13 AIDS prevention programs (7) 266–270, unconscious (22) 10–11 275–277 Affects, indirect intergroup contact (25) 321, Airline fighter pilots (24) 203 321, 322, 353–355, 364–367, see also Alarm system, mortality salience (25) 63, Emotion see also Threat Affect-as-information theory (3) 206–207 Albanians, Kosovar (25) 352 Affective evaluations of behaviour (6) 88–90 Alcohol consumption (23) 232–233 Affective focus, process reliance (19) bingeing (23) 252 309–310 Alcohol, mind-wandering (22) 18–19 Affective priming (8) 67–103; (13) 44–45 Alcohol, opportunity to control (19) 301 Affective processing, advertising (24) 35–36, Algorithmic models of reasoning (2) 40, 40–41, 47, 49, 51, 53–62 121–122 Affective reactions, emotion-based social Algorithms, name-letter effect (25) 234–235, influence (22) 118–120, 122–123, 144 243–251, 249, 254 SUBJECT INDEX 3 Alienation (7) 19–20 Anticipated regret (8) 49–53; (12) 22 Alternative group memberships (4) 36–37 Anticipation (23) 1 Altruism (24) 163, 241, see also Helping Anti-collectivism (23) 344–346, 348, behaviour; Morality 361–365 Altruism Anxiety mood congruency (1) 18 indirect emotion regulation (25) 10, reciprocal (10) 260–264 13–15 Altruistic rationalisation (3) 128–129; (18) intergroup contact (25) 317–318, 322, 193–194 347, 352, 354, 364, 377, see also Ambiguous information, attitude formation Indirect intergroup contact (11) 63–64 and mortality salience (25) 37, 42, 43, 44, Ambivalence and attitude (11) 35–74; (12) 59, 61, 62, 64 37–70; (12) 85–88 and self-esteem (25) 243 Ambivalent information, mood congruency see also Fear (1) 15 Anxiety and anxious behaviour in cross- America (24) see USA group encounters (22) 364, 366–367, 368, American flag experiment, terror 370, 371–373, 378–379 management theory (25) 42 Anxiety, healthcare disparities (24) 92–93 Americans, collective guilt (25) 125, see also Anxiety, implementation intentions (23) 164, Ethnic minorities; USA 166–167 Amygdala, dehumanised perception (20) Anxiety 216–218 intergroup anxiety (19) 20–21; (19) racial bias (21) 261–262, 263, 264, 246–247 266–267 stereotype threat (14) 255–256; (19) Amygdala, stereotyping (22) 248–250 243–244, 250–251 Anchoring (10) 136–139 Anxious attachment (25) see Attachment cue utilization (8) 143 style hindsight bias (8) 120–122 Apartheid (24) 14, 196 self-anchoring (13) 15–16, 20–21, 25–26 Apartment renting scenario, inaction inertia Anchoring, inaction inertia (24) 127, 138 (24) 131 Anger Apology (24) 3, 6, 7, see also Intergroup adaptive response (22) 149–150 forgiveness evolution (22) 150 Apology, collective guilt (17) 23–24 social influence (22) 117, 125, 127–130, Apologies-by-proxy (24) 19, 20, 22, 23 132–134, 140, 142–143, 146–148, Appraisal patterns 149 emotions (22) 117, 121, 153 Anger, conflict resolution (25) 4, 5, 8, 8, 9, reverse appraisals (22) 122–123 see also Aggression Appraisal theories, emotion (20) 234–235; Anger, and helping behaviour (24) 244, (25) 3–10, 8, 11, 21, 22, 24 245–246 Approach (23) 28–30 Animalistic dehumanisation (23) 69–70 Approach behaviour, secondary emotions Animality (23) 71 (15) 286–287 ANOVA analogy, attribution (5) 167–172 Approach–avoidance conflict (11) 50–52 Antecedents, extended and vicarious contact Approach/inhibition model (21) 15–16 (25) 320, 321, 322 Archival data analysis (9) 272–273 Antecedents, intergroup forgiveness (24) 5–6 Argumentation, attitude change (8) 5–7 Anterior cingulate cortex (22) 19, 21; (22) Armenians (17) 6 178; (22) 237–238 Arousal, cost–reward model (24) 227, 241 Anterior temporal lobe (22) 229 Arousal and emotion (20) 236 Anthropomorphism (20) 204 , 207–208 Arousal, dissonance (22) 41, 42 4 SUBJECT INDEX Arousal, physiological (23) 117–118 Attentional processes, advertising (24) 33, Art and terror management (21) 114–154 35, 37, 39–46, 40, 43, 49–59, 55, 57, 59 Artificial grammar learning (22) 298 Attitude(s) Ashkenazi Jews, intergroup encounters (25) accessibility and affective priming (8) 114–115, 117, 126, 127, 129, 130 76–77 Asia (24) 235–236 affect (8) 33–66; (10) 78–92;(11)2–3 Asian cultures, death-defending behavior ambiguous information (11) 63–64 (25) 51 ambivalence (11) 35–74; (12) 37–70; (12) Assimilation 85–88 anchoring (10) 137–145 attribution paradigm (15) 191–195 intergroup variability (7) 118–120 behaviour link (7) 252;(11)16–26;(11) multicultural ideologies (25) 146, 61–63; (12) 53–59; (13) 293–323;(18) 146–148, 154–161, 155, 159 109–119 national identity (25) 215–216, 218, 220 cognitive information (10) 78–92 outgroup similarity (1) 146–151 conflict resolution (25) 7, 8, 18 question answers (2) 38–41 consistency (1) 188–189 social comparison (21) 84–85, 99–101 definition (10) 76–78 Assimilative beliefs, moderating discursive social psychology (9) 241–259 humanisation (23) 92–93 embeddedness (12) 89 Association (23) 68 ethnic minorities, national identity (25) future-reality (23) 31–34 197– 199, 212–216 reality-instrumental means (23) 34 evaluation (11) 2–3 Associationistic concepts, judgement (14) expectancy–value model (11) 4–8 39–41 expression, group polarization (7) Associative networks, attitude research (24) 173–207 264 habit and (10) 115–117 Associative processing model, advertising historiometry (9) 274–275 (24) 32, 34, 40, 40–41, 45–52, 46, implicit–explicit consistency (16) 56, 62 335–390 foundations (24) 37–39 inconsistency (12) 88–89 limitations (24) 60–61 and indirect intergroup contact (25) 351, merits (24) 59–60 367–369 Assumptive helping (24) 237 individual differences (18) 61–72 Assumptive world (4) 195–205 information processing (11) 4–8, 9–16; Athletes, doping (24) 8 (11) 60–61 Attachment, facial expression perception (14) intention (11) 61–63; (12) 53–59; (13) 58–65 297–306 Attachment style majority vs.
Recommended publications
  • The Roles of Client Religion, Counselor Religiosity, and Spiritual

    The Roles of Client Religion, Counselor Religiosity, and Spiritual

    THE ROLES OF CLIENT RELIGION, COUNSELOR RELIGIOSITY, AND SPIRITUAL COMPETENCE IN COUNSELORS’ CLINICAL JUDGMENT A DISSERTATION IN Counseling Psychology Presented to the Faculty of the University of Missouri-Kansas City in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY by DOMINICK A. SCALISE B.A., Truman State University, 2004 M.A., Truman State University, 2006 Kansas City, Missouri 2011 © 2011 DOMINICK ANTHONY SCALISE ALL RIGHTS RESERVED THE ROLES OF CLIENT RELIGION, COUNSELOR RELIGIOSITY, AND SPIRITUAL COMPETENCE IN COUNSELORS’ CLINICAL JUDGMENT Dominick Anthony Scalise, Candidate for the Doctor of Philosophy Degree University of Missouri-Kansas City, 2011 ABSTRACT The present study explored the roles that clients’ religious beliefs, therapists’ spiritual/religious beliefs, and therapists’ attitudes toward spirituality and religion may play in how therapists conceptualize a prospective client case. The study also explored the role that the construct “spiritual competence” played in moderating the relationship between therapists’ attitudes toward spirituality and religion and factors related to their clinical judgment of the client’s concerns. One hundred seventy-six therapists and doctoral students were randomly assigned to read one of four vignettes differing only on the client’s spiritual/religious beliefs and practices (Christian, Muslim, Buddhist, or an unstated religious preference). In order to account for various forms of clinical decision-making, a MANCOVA was used with dependent constructs of psychopathology, attribution for the problem, and prognosis. A separate MANCOVA was conducted in order to determine whether the interaction of client religious orientation (religious vs. unidentified religion) and counselor spiritual competence (high vs. low) would be related to different clinical judgments.
  • Statsvetenskaplig Tidskrift Ny Följd, Årg 90

    Statsvetenskaplig Tidskrift Ny Följd, Årg 90

    n112 2010/1 Innehåll Uppsatser Jan Tullberg: Stereotypfördömandet – en fördom om fördomar? . 3 Översikter och meddelanden Nya forskningsanslag från Vetenskapsrådet och Riksbankens jubileumsfond . 21 Erik Amnå: Skolornas institutionella karaktär och elevernas medborgarkompetens: en jämförelse av olika kommunala och fristående skolor över tid och rum. 23 Ludvig Beckman: Universal suffrage for real? A global index of suffrage restrictions and an explanatory framework . 33 Ludvig Beckman: Globalisation and New Political Rights. The Challenges of the Rights to Inclusion, Self-Determination and Secession . 42 Christina Bergqvist: Vem tar hand om barnen? En jämförande studie av samspelet mellan politik och kultur för beslutsfattande i familjen . 50 Sverker Gustavsson: Thick and thin constitutionalism . 56 Anna K. Jarstad: Local Peace Agreements: The Road to Peace and Democracy in KwaZulu Natal? . 60 Christer Karlsson: Hur regleras EU-medlemskapet?. 69 Johannes Lindvall: The Political Consequences of The Crisis. 79 Ulf Mörkenstam: Indigenous rights to self-determination: The Institutional Design and Policy Process of the Swedish Sami Parliament. 83 Alexa Robertson: Europe as Other: Difference in global media discourse Bo Rothstein: The Determinants of Institutional Quality. How Leaders´ Perceived Threat of Losing Power Without Compensation Affects Economic Development. 85 nStatsvetenskaplig tidskrift Ny följd, årg 90. Utgiven av Fahlbeckska stiftelsen . redaktionssekreterare Mats Sjölin (ansvarig ut- givare) bitr redaktionssekreterare Björn Badersten
  • Intergroup Threat Theory Walter G. Stephan University of Hawaii Oscar

    Intergroup Threat Theory Walter G. Stephan University of Hawaii Oscar

    Intergroup Threat Theory Walter G. Stephan University of Hawaii Oscar Ybarra University of Michigan Kimberly Rios Morrison Stanford University To be published T. Nelson (Ed.), Handbook of Prejudice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Address correspondence to: Walter G. Stephan, 2097 Aliali Pl. Hononlulu, HI 96821. Email: [email protected] Intergroup Threat Theory We live in a world polarized by religion, nationality, political ideology, race, ethnicity, sex, social class, and so many more divisions they are too numerous to mention. These social groups shape our identities and our lives. All of these social groups are characterized by membership criteria and boundaries – they include some people and exclude others. Although it is not logically necessary for these boundaries to imply any tension between groups, in practice relations between groups are far more likely to be antagonistic than complementary. Social identity theorists argue that one reason for intergroup antagonism is the psychological benefits conferred on group members, particularly those associated with identification with ingroups (Tajfel & Turner, 1986). These benefits include acceptance, belonging, and social support, as well as a system of roles, rules, norms, values, and beliefs to guide behavior. Groups also provide our lives with meaning by boosting our self-esteem (Crocker & Luhtanen, 1990), increasing our sense of distinctiveness from others (Turner, 1987), and making us more certain of the social world and our place within it (Abrams & Hogg, 1988). Because of the needs they fill, groups are as dear to us as life itself, and we fear their destruction almost as much as we fear our own. As a result, we tend to favor our own group and exhibit hostility toward other groups, especially during dangerous or contentious times (Branscombe, Ellemers, Spears, & Doosje, 1999; Tajfel & Turner, 1986).
  • I NOT BAD, for a MAN: SHIFTING STANDARDS in the PROVISION of EMOTIONAL SUPPORT WITHIN ROMANTIC RELATIONSHIPS by Melinda Ciccoci

    I NOT BAD, for a MAN: SHIFTING STANDARDS in the PROVISION of EMOTIONAL SUPPORT WITHIN ROMANTIC RELATIONSHIPS by Melinda Ciccoci

    NOT BAD, FOR A MAN: SHIFTING STANDARDS IN THE PROVISION OF EMOTIONAL SUPPORT WITHIN ROMANTIC RELATIONSHIPS by Melinda Ciccocioppo Bachelor of Arts, Carlow University, 2002 Master of Science, University of Pittsburgh, 2008 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The Kenneth P. Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgi h 2012 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH DIETRICH SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES This dissertation was presented by Melinda Ciccocioppo It was presented on April 17, 2011 for approval by Elizabeth Votruba-Drzal, Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology Martin Greenberg, Professor Emeritus, Department of Psychology Brooke Feeney, Associate Professor, Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University Thesis Director/Dissertation Advisor: Irene Frieze, Professor, Department of Psychology ii NOT BAD, FOR A MAN: SHIFTING STANDARDS IN THE PROVISION OF EMOTIONAL SUPPORT WITHIN ROMANTIC RELATIONSHIPS Melinda Ciccocioppo, PhD University of Pittsburgh, [year] Copyright © by Melinda Ciccocioppo 2012 iii NOT BAD, FOR A MAN: SHIFTING STANDARDS IN THE PROVISION OF EMOTIONAL SUPPORT WITHIN ROMANTIC RELATIONSHIPS Melinda Ciccocioppo, PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2012 Previous research has found mixed results in terms of gender differences in the provision of emotional support to a relationship partner. Some studies support the popular stereotype that women are more emotionally supportive than men, while others find no gender differences in the amount of emotional support men and women provide to one another in a romantic relationship. These conflicting findings may be the result of shifting standards for men and women in terms of the amount of emotional support that is expected to be provided by each within a relationship.
  • Committees and Welcomes

    Committees and Welcomes

    Committees and Welcomes SPSP Execut ive and Com m it t ees Welcome to the Fourth Annual SPSP President Jim BlascovichMeeting! Past President Claude SteeleDear SPSP Colleagues, President Elect Hazel Markus It is my great pleasure to welcome you to the annual meetings Executive Officer Harry Reis of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology. Co-Secretary Treasurers Leslie Zebrowitz Sharon Brehm This is our fourth annual meeting – a remarkably brief history Members-at-Large David Dunning for a convention that is now so firmly established. Our confer- David Funder ences in Nashville, San Antonio, and Savannah each drew crowds that were greatly in excess of expectations. In so doing, Judith Harakiewicz they rapidly established SPSP as the major national or interna- APA Council Representatives Monica Biernat tional scientific meeting for personality and social psycholo- June Tangney gists. Publication Committee John Dovidio Gifford Weary We now look forward to building on this string of success in Universal City/Los Angeles, site of our 2003 meeting. This Joanne Wood year, we once again have an exceptionally strong and diverse Convention Committee Dan Cervone chair set of scientific presentations. Our program is expanded even Lynne Cooper beyond last year’s offerings, thanks in part to funding from the Rick Hoyle Decade of Behavior initiative, which is supporting a plenary Training Committee Lisa Aspinwall address by the renowned biologist and author Jared Diamond. Kim Bartholomew We also have expanded on the lighter side of things; on Satur- Allen Omoto day night, we will end our meetings with a social event featur- PSPB Editor Fred Rhodewalt ing DJ’d music at 8 pm followed by a live performance by the PSPR Editor Eliot Smith LA rock band Lustra.
  • The Situational Character: a Critical Realist Perspective on the Human Animal , 93 93 Geo L

    The Situational Character: a Critical Realist Perspective on the Human Animal , 93 93 Geo L

    Santa Clara Law Santa Clara Law Digital Commons Faculty Publications Faculty Scholarship 11-2004 The ituaS tional Character: A Critical Realist Perspective on the Human Animal Jon Hanson Santa Clara University School of Law David Yosifon Santa Clara University School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/facpubs Part of the Law and Economics Commons, Law and Society Commons, and the Legal History Commons Automated Citation Jon Hanson and David Yosifon, The Situational Character: A Critical Realist Perspective on the Human Animal , 93 93 Geo L. J. 1 (2004), Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/facpubs/59 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Santa Clara Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Santa Clara Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Articles The Situational Character: A Critical Realist Perspective on the Human Animal JON HANSON* & DAVID YOSIFON** Th is Article is dedicated to retiring the now-dominant "rational actor" model of human agency, together with its numerous "dispositionist" cohorts, and replacing them with a new conception of human agency that the authors call the "situational character." Th is is a key installment of a larger project recently introduced in an article titled The Situation: An Introduction to the Situational Character, Critical Realism, Power Economics, and Deep Capture. 1 That introduc­ tory article adumbrated, often in broad stroke, the central premises and some basic conclusions of a new app roach to legal theory and policy analysis.
  • Working Memory, Cognitive Miserliness and Logic As Predictors of Performance on the Cognitive Reflection Test

    Working Memory, Cognitive Miserliness and Logic As Predictors of Performance on the Cognitive Reflection Test

    Working Memory, Cognitive Miserliness and Logic as Predictors of Performance on the Cognitive Reflection Test Edward J. N. Stupple ([email protected]) Centre for Psychological Research, University of Derby Kedleston Road, Derby. DE22 1GB Maggie Gale ([email protected]) Centre for Psychological Research, University of Derby Kedleston Road, Derby. DE22 1GB Christopher R. Richmond ([email protected]) Centre for Psychological Research, University of Derby Kedleston Road, Derby. DE22 1GB Abstract Most participants respond that the answer is 10 cents; however, a slower and more analytic approach to the The Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT) was devised to measure problem reveals the correct answer to be 5 cents. the inhibition of heuristic responses to favour analytic ones. The CRT has been a spectacular success, attracting more Toplak, West and Stanovich (2011) demonstrated that the than 100 citations in 2012 alone (Scopus). This may be in CRT was a powerful predictor of heuristics and biases task part due to the ease of administration; with only three items performance - proposing it as a metric of the cognitive miserliness central to dual process theories of thinking. This and no requirement for expensive equipment, the practical thesis was examined using reasoning response-times, advantages are considerable. There have, moreover, been normative responses from two reasoning tasks and working numerous correlates of the CRT demonstrated, from a wide memory capacity (WMC) to predict individual differences in range of tasks in the heuristics and biases literature (Toplak performance on the CRT. These data offered limited support et al., 2011) to risk aversion and SAT scores (Frederick, for the view of miserliness as the primary factor in the CRT.
  • Contact, Perspective Taking, and Anxiety As Predictors of Stereotype Endorsement, Explicit Attitudes, and Implicit Attitudes Christopher L

    Contact, Perspective Taking, and Anxiety As Predictors of Stereotype Endorsement, Explicit Attitudes, and Implicit Attitudes Christopher L

    Contact, Perspective Taking, and Anxiety as Predictors of Stereotype Endorsement, Explicit Attitudes, and Implicit Attitudes Christopher L. Aberson, Sarah C. Haag To cite this version: Christopher L. Aberson, Sarah C. Haag. Contact, Perspective Taking, and Anxiety as Predictors of Stereotype Endorsement, Explicit Attitudes, and Implicit Attitudes. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, SAGE Publications, 2007, 10 (2), pp.179-201. 10.1177/1368430207074726. hal-00571645 HAL Id: hal-00571645 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00571645 Submitted on 1 Mar 2011 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 2007 Vol 10(2) 179–201 Contact, Perspective Taking, and Anxiety as Predictors of Stereotype Endorsement, Explicit Attitudes, and Implicit Attitudes Christopher L. Aberson Humboldt State University Sarah C. Haag University of Iowa We proposed a model of intergroup contact wherein contact promotes understanding of outgroup perspectives, perspective taking relates to reduced intergroup anxiety that in turn is associated with lessened stereotyping and more positive intergroup attitudes. Additionally, we examined if implicit attitudes followed this model or were directly impacted by contact. White undergraduates (n = 153) completed measures of contact, perspective taking, intergroup anxiety, stereotype endorsement, and implicit and explicit intergroup attitudes.
  • Gender, Emotion and Power in Work Relationships☆

    Gender, Emotion and Power in Work Relationships☆

    Human Resource Management Review 21 (2011) 377–393 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Human Resource Management Review journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/humres Gender, emotion and power in work relationships☆ Belle Rose Ragins a,⁎, Doan E. Winkel b,1 a University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Sheldon B. Lubar School of Business, Milwaukee, WI 53201, United States b Illinois State University, College of Business, Normal, IL 61790, United States article info abstract Keywords: We offer a theoretical account of how gender and emotion combine to influence the Gender in the workplace development of power in work relationships. We document the profound impact gender has on Gender and emotion at work the display, perception and evaluation of emotion in the workplace. We illustrate the reciprocal Gender and discrimination at work relationship between emotion and power, and identify cycles of powerlessness that prevent Gender and power at work women from developing and leveraging power in their work relationships. By exploring the nexus of gender, emotion and power in work relationships, we offer new insights into how the gendering of emotion creates and perpetuates gender differences in power in organizations. Implications for research and practice are offered. © 2011 Published by Elsevier Inc. “If you get too emotional, that undercuts you. A man can cry; we know that. Lots of our leaders have cried. But a woman, it's a different kind of dynamic.” Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton (Dowd, 2008) Despite women's increasing workforce participation, the gender gap in power in organizations has not changed appreciably over the past twenty years (Catalyst, 2010; Eagly & Carli, 2007a; Ryan & Haslam, 2007).
  • Mind Perception Daniel R. Ames Malia F. Mason Columbia

    Mind Perception Daniel R. Ames Malia F. Mason Columbia

    Mind Perception Daniel R. Ames Malia F. Mason Columbia University To appear in The Sage Handbook of Social Cognition, S. Fiske and N. Macrae (Eds.) Please do not cite or circulate without permission Contact: Daniel Ames Columbia Business School 707 Uris Hall 3022 Broadway New York, NY 10027 [email protected] 2 What will they think of next? The contemporary colloquial meaning of this phrase often stems from wonder over some new technological marvel, but we use it here in a wholly literal sense as our starting point. For millions of years, members of our evolving species have gazed at one another and wondered: what are they thinking right now … and what will they think of next? The interest people take in each other’s minds is more than idle curiosity. Two of the defining features of our species are our behavioral flexibility—an enormously wide repertoire of actions with an exquisitely complicated and sometimes non-obvious connection to immediate contexts— and our tendency to live together. As a result, people spend a terrific amount of time in close company with conspecifics doing potentially surprising and bewildering things. Most of us resist giving up on human society and embracing the life of a hermit. Instead, most perceivers proceed quite happily to explain and predict others’ actions by invoking invisible qualities such as beliefs, desires, intentions, and feelings and ascribing them without conclusive proof to others. People cannot read one another’s minds. And yet somehow, many times each day, most people encounter other individuals and “go mental,” as it were, adopting what is sometimes called an intentional stance, treating the individuals around them as if they were guided by unseen and unseeable mental states (Dennett, 1987).
  • Biernat, P. 1 Curriculum Vitae Monica R

    Biernat, P. 1 Curriculum Vitae Monica R

    Biernat, p. 1 Curriculum Vitae Monica R. Biernat Work Address: Home Address: Department of Psychology 4801 Tempe St. Fraser Hall Lawrence, KS 66047 1415 Jayhawk Blvd. (785) 843-7597 University of Kansas Lawrence, KS 66045-7556 phone: (785) 864-9815 fax: (785) 864-5696 email: [email protected] Birth Date and Place: January 18, 1963, Detroit, MI Professional and Educational History: 2010 - present Associate Chair for Research and Graduate Studies, University of Kansas 2003 - present Professor, Department of Psychology, University of Kansas 2000 - present Director of Social Psychology Ph.D. Program, University of Kansas 1995 - 2003 Associate Professor, Department of Psychology, University of Kansas 1992 - 1995 Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, University of Kansas 1989 - 1992 Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, University of Florida 2008 Visiting scholar, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 2001 Visiting scholar, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada 1989 Ph.D., University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Psychology (Social) 1986 M.A., University of Michigan, Psychology 1984 A.B., University of Michigan, Psychology and Communication Awards: APA Distinguished Scientific Award for Early Career Contribution to Psychology in the area of Social Psychology, 1998/1999 [Citation appears in American Psychologist (1999), Vol. 54, pp. 897-899.] Association for Women in Psychology, Distinguished Publication Award, 2005 W. T. Kemper Fellowship for Teaching Excellence, University of Kansas, 2004 Docking Faculty Scholar, University
  • Nawj Psych Terms

    Nawj Psych Terms

    NAWJ Terms List 1 Psychological terms useful in understanding mechanisms allowing unconscious bias Accentuation Effect: Overestimation of similarities among people within a group and dissimilarities between people from different groups Accentuation principle: States that categorization accentuates perceived similarities within and differences between groups on dimensions that people believe are correlated with the category. The effect is amplified where the categorization/dimension has subjective importance, relevance or value Actor-Observer effect: Tendency to attribute our own behaviors externally and others’ behaviors internally Agentic mode: State of mind thought by Milgram to characterize unquestioning obedience, in which people transfer personal responsibility to the person giving orders Anchoring and adjustment : A cognitive short-cut in which inferences are tied to initial standards or schemas Attitude: A relatively enduring organization of beliefs, feelings and behavioral tendencies towards socially significant objects, groups, events or symbols. Attitude change can occur by inducing someone to perform an act that runs counter to an existing attitude. Attribution : The process of assigning a cause to behaviors and events Availability bias: A cognitive shortcut in which the frequency or likelihood of an event is based on how quickly instances or associations come to mind Bias blind spot: tendency to perceive cognitive and motivational biases much more in others than in oneself Cognition: The knowledge, beliefs, thoughts, and ideas