Committees and Welcomes
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Author's Personal Copy
Author's personal copy Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 35 (2011) 1042–1051 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/neubiorev Review Human threat management systems: Self•protection and disease avoidance Steven L. Neuberg a,∗, Douglas T. Kenrick a, Mark Schaller b a Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287•1104, United States b Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4 article info abstract Article history: Humans likely evolved precautionary systems designed to minimize the threats to reproductive fitness Received 8 March 2010 posed by highly interdependent ultrasociality. A review of research on the self•protection and disease Received in revised form 18 August 2010 avoidance systems reveals that each system is functionally distinct and domain•specific: each is attuned Accepted 18 August 2010 to different cues; engages different emotions, inferences, and behavioral inclinations; and is rooted in somewhat different neurobiological substrates. These systems share important features, however. Each Keywords: system is functionally coherent, in that perceptual, affective, cognitive, and behavioral processes work Self•protection in concert to reduce fitness costs of potential threats. Each system is biased in a risk•averse manner, Disease avoidance Threat management erring toward precautionary responses even when available cues only heuristically imply threat. And Precautionary psychology each system is functionally flexible, being highly sensitive to specific ecological and dispositional cues Evolutionary psychology that signal greater vulnerability to the relevant threat. These features characterize a general template Domain specificity useful for understanding not only the self•protection and disease avoidance systems, but also a broader Fear set of evolved, domain•specific precautionary systems. -
Contact Information
REBECCA NEEL Department of Psychology Arizona State University Tempe, AZ 85287-1104 602-965-3326 EMPLOYMENT Beginning August, 2013 Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, University of Iowa EDUCATION Ph.D., Psychology (May, 2013). Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona. Thesis: “Expert in the language of fear”: Stigmatized targets’ perception of others’ emotion-specific prejudice M.A., Psychology (2010). Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona. Thesis: When does seeing through your eyes help me? Emotions functionally encourage and inhibit perspective taking B.A., English Literature (2002). Carleton College, Northfield, Minnesota. Cum Laude AWARDS AND HONORS 2013 SPSP Graduate Student Travel Award 2012 SPSSI Grant-in-Aid for Dissertation Research 2012 The Robert B. Cialdini Dissertation Project Prize in Social Psychology, ASU 2012 The Darwyn and Marie Linder Fellowship in Experimental Social Psychology, ASU 2012 ASU Graduate and Professional Student Association Grant for Independent Research 2011 Summer Institute in Social Psychology, Princeton, NJ; SPSP program funded by NSF 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 ASU Graduate and Professional Student Association Grant for Conference Travel 2008 ASU Graduate and Professional Student Association Grant for Independent Research 2007 Departmental Research Excellence Award, ASU Psychology Department Neel CV RESEARCH Publications White, A.E., Kenrick, D.T., Neel, R., & Neuberg, S.L. (in press). From the bedroom to the budget deficit: Mate competition changes men’s attitudes toward economic redistribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Sadalla, E., Berlin, A., Neel, R., & Ledlow, S. (in press). Priorities in residential water use: A trade-off analysis. Environment and Behavior. Neel, R., Neufeld, S.L., & Neuberg, S.L. (2013). Would an obese person whistle Vivaldi? Targets of prejudice self-present to minimize appearance of specific threats. -
The Roles of Client Religion, Counselor Religiosity, and Spiritual
THE ROLES OF CLIENT RELIGION, COUNSELOR RELIGIOSITY, AND SPIRITUAL COMPETENCE IN COUNSELORS’ CLINICAL JUDGMENT A DISSERTATION IN Counseling Psychology Presented to the Faculty of the University of Missouri-Kansas City in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY by DOMINICK A. SCALISE B.A., Truman State University, 2004 M.A., Truman State University, 2006 Kansas City, Missouri 2011 © 2011 DOMINICK ANTHONY SCALISE ALL RIGHTS RESERVED THE ROLES OF CLIENT RELIGION, COUNSELOR RELIGIOSITY, AND SPIRITUAL COMPETENCE IN COUNSELORS’ CLINICAL JUDGMENT Dominick Anthony Scalise, Candidate for the Doctor of Philosophy Degree University of Missouri-Kansas City, 2011 ABSTRACT The present study explored the roles that clients’ religious beliefs, therapists’ spiritual/religious beliefs, and therapists’ attitudes toward spirituality and religion may play in how therapists conceptualize a prospective client case. The study also explored the role that the construct “spiritual competence” played in moderating the relationship between therapists’ attitudes toward spirituality and religion and factors related to their clinical judgment of the client’s concerns. One hundred seventy-six therapists and doctoral students were randomly assigned to read one of four vignettes differing only on the client’s spiritual/religious beliefs and practices (Christian, Muslim, Buddhist, or an unstated religious preference). In order to account for various forms of clinical decision-making, a MANCOVA was used with dependent constructs of psychopathology, attribution for the problem, and prognosis. A separate MANCOVA was conducted in order to determine whether the interaction of client religious orientation (religious vs. unidentified religion) and counselor spiritual competence (high vs. low) would be related to different clinical judgments. -
Statsvetenskaplig Tidskrift Ny Följd, Årg 90
n112 2010/1 Innehåll Uppsatser Jan Tullberg: Stereotypfördömandet – en fördom om fördomar? . 3 Översikter och meddelanden Nya forskningsanslag från Vetenskapsrådet och Riksbankens jubileumsfond . 21 Erik Amnå: Skolornas institutionella karaktär och elevernas medborgarkompetens: en jämförelse av olika kommunala och fristående skolor över tid och rum. 23 Ludvig Beckman: Universal suffrage for real? A global index of suffrage restrictions and an explanatory framework . 33 Ludvig Beckman: Globalisation and New Political Rights. The Challenges of the Rights to Inclusion, Self-Determination and Secession . 42 Christina Bergqvist: Vem tar hand om barnen? En jämförande studie av samspelet mellan politik och kultur för beslutsfattande i familjen . 50 Sverker Gustavsson: Thick and thin constitutionalism . 56 Anna K. Jarstad: Local Peace Agreements: The Road to Peace and Democracy in KwaZulu Natal? . 60 Christer Karlsson: Hur regleras EU-medlemskapet?. 69 Johannes Lindvall: The Political Consequences of The Crisis. 79 Ulf Mörkenstam: Indigenous rights to self-determination: The Institutional Design and Policy Process of the Swedish Sami Parliament. 83 Alexa Robertson: Europe as Other: Difference in global media discourse Bo Rothstein: The Determinants of Institutional Quality. How Leaders´ Perceived Threat of Losing Power Without Compensation Affects Economic Development. 85 nStatsvetenskaplig tidskrift Ny följd, årg 90. Utgiven av Fahlbeckska stiftelsen . redaktionssekreterare Mats Sjölin (ansvarig ut- givare) bitr redaktionssekreterare Björn Badersten -
I NOT BAD, for a MAN: SHIFTING STANDARDS in the PROVISION of EMOTIONAL SUPPORT WITHIN ROMANTIC RELATIONSHIPS by Melinda Ciccoci
NOT BAD, FOR A MAN: SHIFTING STANDARDS IN THE PROVISION OF EMOTIONAL SUPPORT WITHIN ROMANTIC RELATIONSHIPS by Melinda Ciccocioppo Bachelor of Arts, Carlow University, 2002 Master of Science, University of Pittsburgh, 2008 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The Kenneth P. Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgi h 2012 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH DIETRICH SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES This dissertation was presented by Melinda Ciccocioppo It was presented on April 17, 2011 for approval by Elizabeth Votruba-Drzal, Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology Martin Greenberg, Professor Emeritus, Department of Psychology Brooke Feeney, Associate Professor, Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University Thesis Director/Dissertation Advisor: Irene Frieze, Professor, Department of Psychology ii NOT BAD, FOR A MAN: SHIFTING STANDARDS IN THE PROVISION OF EMOTIONAL SUPPORT WITHIN ROMANTIC RELATIONSHIPS Melinda Ciccocioppo, PhD University of Pittsburgh, [year] Copyright © by Melinda Ciccocioppo 2012 iii NOT BAD, FOR A MAN: SHIFTING STANDARDS IN THE PROVISION OF EMOTIONAL SUPPORT WITHIN ROMANTIC RELATIONSHIPS Melinda Ciccocioppo, PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2012 Previous research has found mixed results in terms of gender differences in the provision of emotional support to a relationship partner. Some studies support the popular stereotype that women are more emotionally supportive than men, while others find no gender differences in the amount of emotional support men and women provide to one another in a romantic relationship. These conflicting findings may be the result of shifting standards for men and women in terms of the amount of emotional support that is expected to be provided by each within a relationship. -
Preferences Under Pressure
Eric Skoog Preferences Under Pressure Conflict, Threat Cues and Willingness to Compromise Dissertation presented at Uppsala University to be publicly examined in Zootissalen, EBC, Villavägen 9, Uppsala, Friday, 13 March 2020 at 10:15 for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. The examination will be conducted in English. Faculty examiner: Associate Professor Thomas Zeitzoff (American University, School of Public Affairs). Abstract Skoog, E. 2020. Preferences Under Pressure. Conflict, Threat Cues and Willingness to Compromise. Report / Department of Peace and Conflict Research 121. 66 pp. Uppsala: Department of Peace and Conflict Research. ISBN 978-91-506-2805-0. Understanding how preferences are formed is a key question in the social sciences. The ability of agents to interact with each other is a prerequisite for well-functioning societies. Nevertheless, the process whereby the preferences of agents in conflict are formed have often been black boxed, and the literature on the effects of armed conflict on individuals reveals a great variation in terms of outcomes. Sometimes, individuals are willing to cooperate and interact even with former enemies, while sometimes, we see outright refusal to cooperate or interact at all. In this dissertation, I look at the role of threat in driving some of these divergent results. Armed conflict is rife with physical threats to life, limb and property, and there has been much research pointing to the impact of threat on preferences, attitudes and behavior. Research in the field of evolutionary psychology has revealed that threat is not a singular category, but a nuanced phenomenon, where different types of threat may lead to different responses. -
Gender, Emotion and Power in Work Relationships☆
Human Resource Management Review 21 (2011) 377–393 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Human Resource Management Review journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/humres Gender, emotion and power in work relationships☆ Belle Rose Ragins a,⁎, Doan E. Winkel b,1 a University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Sheldon B. Lubar School of Business, Milwaukee, WI 53201, United States b Illinois State University, College of Business, Normal, IL 61790, United States article info abstract Keywords: We offer a theoretical account of how gender and emotion combine to influence the Gender in the workplace development of power in work relationships. We document the profound impact gender has on Gender and emotion at work the display, perception and evaluation of emotion in the workplace. We illustrate the reciprocal Gender and discrimination at work relationship between emotion and power, and identify cycles of powerlessness that prevent Gender and power at work women from developing and leveraging power in their work relationships. By exploring the nexus of gender, emotion and power in work relationships, we offer new insights into how the gendering of emotion creates and perpetuates gender differences in power in organizations. Implications for research and practice are offered. © 2011 Published by Elsevier Inc. “If you get too emotional, that undercuts you. A man can cry; we know that. Lots of our leaders have cried. But a woman, it's a different kind of dynamic.” Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton (Dowd, 2008) Despite women's increasing workforce participation, the gender gap in power in organizations has not changed appreciably over the past twenty years (Catalyst, 2010; Eagly & Carli, 2007a; Ryan & Haslam, 2007). -
1989-90 O-Pee-Chee Hockey Card Set Checklist
1 989-90 O-PEE-CHEE HOCKEY CARD SET CHECKLI ST 1 Mario Lemieux 2 Ulf Dahlen 3 Terry Carkner RC 4 Tony McKegney 5 Denis Savard 6 Derek King RC 7 Lanny McDonald 8 John Tonelli 9 Tom Kurvers 10 Dave Archibald 11 Peter Sidorkiewicz RC 12 Esa Tikkanen 13 Dave Barr 14 Brent Sutter 15 Cam Neely 16 Calle Johansson RC 17 Patrick Roy 18 Dale DeGray RC 19 Phil Bourque RC 20 Kevin Dineen 21 Mike Bullard 22 Gary Leeman 23 Greg Stefan 24 Brian Mullen 25 Pierre Turgeon 26 Bob Rouse RC 27 Peter Zezel 28 Jeff Brown 29 Andy Brickley RC 30 Mike Gartner 31 Darren Pang 32 Pat Verbeek 33 Petri Skriko 34 Tom Laidlaw 35 Randy Wood 36 Tom Barrasso 37 John Tucker 38 Andrew McBain 39 David Shaw 40 Reggie Lemelin 41 Dino Ciccarelli 42 Jeff Sharples Compliments of BaseballCardBinders.com© 2019 1 43 Jari Kurri 44 Murray Craven 45 Cliff Ronning RC 46 Dave Babych 47 Bernie Nicholls 48 Jon Casey RC 49 Al MacInnis 50 Bob Errey RC 51 Glen Wesley 52 Dirk Graham 53 Guy Carbonneau 54 Tomas Sandstrom 55 Rod Langway 56 Patrik Sundstrom 57 Michel Goulet 58 Dave Taylor 59 Phil Housley 60 Pat LaFontaine 61 Kirk McLean RC 62 Ken Linseman 63 Randy Cunneyworth 64 Tony Hrkac 65 Mark Messier 66 Carey Wilson 67 Steve Leach RC 68 Christian Ruuttu 69 Dave Ellett 70 Ray Ferraro 71 Colin Patterson RC 72 Tim Kerr 73 Bob Joyce 74 Doug Gilmour 75 Lee Norwood 76 Dale Hunter 77 Jim Johnson 78 Mike Foligno 79 Al Iafrate 80 Rick Tocchet 81 Greg Hawgood RC 82 Steve Thomas 83 Steve Yzerman 84 Mike McPhee 85 David Volek RC 86 Brian Benning 87 Neal Broten 88 Luc Robitaille 89 Trevor Linden RC Compliments -
States in Mind Anthony C. Lopez, Rose Mcdermott, and Michael
States in Mind States in Mind Anthony C. Lopez, Rose McDermott, and Evolution, Coalitional Psychology, and Michael Bang International Politics Petersen One of the most com- monly studied puzzles in international politics is the recurrence of coalitional competition and aggression between political groups such as states. Indeed, this pattern constitutes an enduring and central feature of all politics. Yet de- spite the tragic endurance of this leitmotif throughout history, its manifestation varies through time and space. Some wars are fought for honor or revenge, whereas others are ignited for mere opportunism or as a consequence of vari- ous misperceptions, whatever their source. We argue that evolutionary theory provides a theoretical framework that can explain both the stubborn endur- ance and dynamic diversity of coalitional behavior. Debate on the relevance of “human nature” and biological factors for explaining political behavior is not new.1 Yet the comprehensive value of evo- lutionary theory for explaining important aspects of international politics has not been adequately explicated. As we discuss below, this has in part been a consequence of general skepticism about the validity and scope of evolution- ary theory for explaining political behavior. We argue, however, that evolu- tionary psychology can generate falsiªable ex ante predictions that are of central interest to the study of international politics, and we offer several hy- potheses derived from this model to illustrate the depth of this approach. Evo- lutionary psychologists have already generated a large body of work that suggests that the human brain contains webs of psychological mechanisms, or adaptations, each designed to operate in domains relevant to modern politics, and which emerged as a product of natural selection. -
NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Pers Soc Psychol Bull
NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Pers Soc Psychol Bull. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2009 December 28. NIH-PA Author ManuscriptPublished NIH-PA Author Manuscript in final edited NIH-PA Author Manuscript form as: Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2009 October ; 35(10): 1356±1367. doi:10.1177/0146167209339627. Following in the Wake of Anger: When Not Discriminating Is Discriminating Jenessa R. Shapiro, University of California, Los Angeles Joshua M. Ackerman, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Steven L. Neuberg, Arizona State University Jon K. Maner, Florida State University D. Vaughn Becker, and Arizona State University Douglas T. Kenrick Arizona State University Abstract Does seeing a scowling face change your impression of the next person you see? Does this depend on the race of the two people? Across four studies, White participants evaluated neutrally expressive White males as less threatening when they followed angry (relative to neutral) White faces; Black males were not judged as less threatening following angry Black faces. This lack of threat-anchored contrast for Black male faces is not attributable to a general tendency for White targets to homogenize Black males—neutral Black targets following smiling Black faces were contrasted away from them and seen as less friendly—and emerged only for perceivers low in motivation to respond without prejudice (i.e., for those relatively comfortable responding prejudicially). This research provides novel evidence for the overperception of threat in Black males. Keywords prejudice; stereotypes; threat; race; internal motivation to respond without prejudice Imagine being invited to a social gathering consisting primarily of people you do not know. One of the guests becomes irate and begins acting in a threatening manner, so you move away and join a different group of people—a group that seems comparatively safe. -
Takao Sasaki
Takao Sasaki Odum School of Ecology, University of Georgia 140 E Green St Athens, GA 30602 USA E-mail: [email protected] Office phone: +1 (706) 705-0574 Website: http://sasakilab.ecology.uga.edu Appointments 2018- Assistant Professor, Odum School of Ecology, University of Georgia Education 2008-2013 Ph. D. Biology, Arizona State University Advisor: Stephen Pratt Committee members: Nia Amazeen, Jennifer Fewell, Bert Hölldobler, Marco Janssen and Jürgen Liebig Dissertation: “Psychology of a superorganism” 2006-2008 M. S. Applied psychology, Arizona State University Advisors: David. Becker, Douglas Kenrick and Steven Neuberg Thesis: “The relationship between product information quantity and diversity of consumer decisions” 1998-2002 B. S. Physics, Nihon University Research Experience 2016-present Marie Skłodowska-Curie Postdoctoral Fellow, Zoology Department, Oxford University Advisor: Dora Biro 2014-2016 Royal Society Newton Postdoctoral Fellow, Zoology Department, Oxford University Advisor: Dora Biro 2013-2014 Postdoctoral Fellow, School of Life Sciences and Centre for Social Dynamics and Complexity, Arizona State University. Advisors: Bert Hölldobler and Stephen C. Pratt 2008-2013 Research assistant, School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University Advisor: Stephen C. Pratt 2006-2008 Research assistant, Psychology, Arizona State University Advisors: David V. Becker, Douglas Kenrick and Steven Neuberg CV T. Sasaki 1 2003-2004 Research assistant, Ecology, University of California, Davis Advisor: Peter Richerson Publications 21. Sasaki, T., Mann, R.P., Warren, K.N., Herbert, T., Wilson, T. & Biro, D. (2018). Personality and the collective: Bold homing pigeons occupy higher leadership ranks in flocks. Philosophical Transaction of the Royal Society B, 373(1746). 20 Pratt, S.C. & Sasaki, T. -
Biernat, P. 1 Curriculum Vitae Monica R
Biernat, p. 1 Curriculum Vitae Monica R. Biernat Work Address: Home Address: Department of Psychology 4801 Tempe St. Fraser Hall Lawrence, KS 66047 1415 Jayhawk Blvd. (785) 843-7597 University of Kansas Lawrence, KS 66045-7556 phone: (785) 864-9815 fax: (785) 864-5696 email: [email protected] Birth Date and Place: January 18, 1963, Detroit, MI Professional and Educational History: 2010 - present Associate Chair for Research and Graduate Studies, University of Kansas 2003 - present Professor, Department of Psychology, University of Kansas 2000 - present Director of Social Psychology Ph.D. Program, University of Kansas 1995 - 2003 Associate Professor, Department of Psychology, University of Kansas 1992 - 1995 Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, University of Kansas 1989 - 1992 Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, University of Florida 2008 Visiting scholar, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 2001 Visiting scholar, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada 1989 Ph.D., University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Psychology (Social) 1986 M.A., University of Michigan, Psychology 1984 A.B., University of Michigan, Psychology and Communication Awards: APA Distinguished Scientific Award for Early Career Contribution to Psychology in the area of Social Psychology, 1998/1999 [Citation appears in American Psychologist (1999), Vol. 54, pp. 897-899.] Association for Women in Psychology, Distinguished Publication Award, 2005 W. T. Kemper Fellowship for Teaching Excellence, University of Kansas, 2004 Docking Faculty Scholar, University