DOCSLIB.ORG

Origin Notes Afghanistan T-55 600 Soviet Union T-62 170 Soviet Union

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Origin Notes Afghanistan T-55 600 Soviet Union T-62 170 Soviet Union A Quantity Country Type Origin Notes (Estimated) Afghanistan Soviet T-55 600 Union Soviet T-62 170 Union Algeria Soviet T-55 400 Union Soviet T-62 300 Union Soviet T-72 540 Union [1] T-90 180 Russia A strictly ceremonial force in maintained, however, a police force ensures Andorra that law and order are kept. France and Spain are responsible for defense. Angola Soviet T-55 200 Union Soviet T-62 50 Union Soviet T-72 50 Union Argentina Germany/ TAM 330 Medium tank Argentina Armenia Soviet T-55 180 Union Soviet T-72 210 Union Australia M1A1 United AIM 59 States Abrams Austria Leopard 114 Germany 2A4 Azerbaijan T-90 200 Russia Soviet T-72 636 Union B Quantity Country Type Origin Notes (Estimated) Bahrain United M60A3 180 States 1 Bangladesh Type 59 Tank currently going [2] Type 59 36 China through an upgrade programme to Type 59G Type 62 86 China Only 42 remains in service Type 185-Type-69II Mk.2G and 65 250 China 69/79 Type-69II tanks MBT 44 China 44 tanks added in 2012 2000 Belarus Soviet T-54 29 In storage. Union Mostly kept in storage. Soviet T-72B 1,465 Approximately +250 still in regular Union service. Soviet T-80 92 In storage. Union Belgium MBTs retired in favour of Piranha IIIs Bosnia and Soviet M-55 S 150 Herzegovina Union United M60A3 65 States AMX-30 55 France M-84 14 Yugoslavia [3] Brazil Two operational tanks with the EE-T1 2 Brazil Centro de Instrução de Blindados Osório of the Brazilian Army[4] M60A3 United 91 TTS States Leopard 127 Germany 1A1 Leopard 221 Germany 1A5 Bulgaria Soviet T-72 160 Union C Quantity Country Type Origin Notes (Estimated) Cambodia Soviet T-55 103 Union Type 59 200 China Canada Leopard C2 66 Germany 1A5 equivalent 2 20 2A6M leased from Germany, Leopard 40 Germany 20 2A4M upgraded from Leopard 2A6M/2A4M 2A4 stocks.[5] Leopard 80 Germany 2A4 with L55 gun[5] 2A4+ 15 Purchased from Germany as Leopard parts stock[6] 12 purchased from 27 Germany 2A4 Switzerland for use as Armored engineering vehicles's (AEV). Cape Soviet T-55 Verde Union Central Soviet African T-55 4 Union Republic Chad Soviet T-55 60 Union Chile Leopard 8 to be used as spares,updrades 140 Germany 2A4 for Leopard 2A5 in 2015 In April 2013, Chile began Leopard negotiations to purchase 100 100 Germany 2A5 Leopard 2A5 tanks from surplus German stocks Leopard 202 Germany 1A5 People's Main Battle In Republic of China Tank 3000 development China Type 99 ~500 China Type 98 China Type 96 2,500 China Type 90-IIM China Type 90 China Type 88 500 China Type 85 China Type 80 China Type 79 China Type 69 China Type 59D China Type 59 5,000 China Colombia United M48 Patton 40 States 3 Congo, Type 59 30 China Democratic Soviet T-55 20 Republic of Union Congo, Type 59 20 China Republic of Croatia M-95 2 in service 27 are under 29 Croatia Degman construction M-84A4 all will be upgraded to M-84D 75 Croatia Sniper standart Cuba Soviet T-34 300 Union Soviet T-55 1,100 Union Soviet T-62 400 Union Soviet T-72 50 Union Cyprus Soviet T-80 41 Union AMX-30B2 102 France T-80 41 Russia Ordered January 2009 Czech Soviet [7] Republic Union/ Czech upgrade of T-72 to third T-72M4 CZ 30 Czech generation MBT) Republic Soviet T-72 93 Union D Quantity Country Type Origin Notes (Estimated) Denmark Leopard 57 Leopard 2A5DK (equal to 12 /57 Germany 2A4/2A5 Leopard 2A6 minus the L55 gun) Dominica No military exists. Police force is responsible for country's defence affairs. E Quantity Country Type Origin Notes (Estimated) Ecuador AMX-13 80 France Egypt [8] Soviet T-55E 340 Union Soviet A significantly upgraded T-54/55. Ramses 425 Union/ Though the initial prototype (T- II Egypt 54E) was delivered in 1984, full 4 production did not begin until 2004-2005, an additional 140-160 are to be converted from stored T- 55. Soviet T-62E 500 Union Soviet 14 T-80UK and 20 T-80U T-80 34 Union purchased in 1997.[9] Out of 735 M60A3 + 700 M60A1 were brought up to A3 Standard from U.S. Army Europe surplus [10] United M60A3 716 stocks in Germany between 1979- States 1988 + 173 M60A3 between 1992- 2001[11] + 108 M60A3 from the Austrian Army Surplus in 2002,[12] United 1000 out of the 1700 M60A3 M60- 1000 States/ Patton will be upgraded to 2000 Egypt the M60 2000/120S as of 2011. DU armor removed. Upgraded to M1A1 United 1,130[13] M1A2 SEP standard without DU Abrams States inserts[citation needed] Equatorial Soviet T-55 3 Guinea Union Eritrea Soviet T-55 280 Union Ethiopia Soviet T-55 170 Union Soviet T-62 50 Union Soviet T-72 50 Union F Quantity Country Type Origin Notes (Estimated) Fiji Small military force exists. Does not operate MBTs. Finland Leopard 124 Germany 2A4 France Leclerc 407 France G Quantity Country Type Origin Notes (Estimated) Georgia T-72M1 Soviet Current number likely significantly 200 SIM-1 Union smaller due to the 2008 South 5 Israel Ossetia war BM Oplot 12 Ukraine Germany ~400 Leopard (active) Germany Leopard 1s in storage. 2A5/A6/A6M 1600 in reserve. Greece Leopard Germany/ 170 License built in Greece 2A6 HEL Greece Leopard 183 Germany 2A4 Leopard 501 Germany 1A5 United Upgraded with a new Fire Control M48A5 390 States/ System similar to the one found MOLF Greece on the Leopard 1A5 No military force exists. Police force maintains a special unit for internal Grenada security. Regional Security System is responsible for defence affairs Guinea Soviet T-55 8 Union Guinea- Soviet T-55 Bissau Union H Quantity Country Type Origin Notes (Estimated) Haiti Military disbanded, but police force exists to maintain internal security. Hungary 155, 30 in Soviet Last tank brigade abolished early active T-72M1 Union 2007. Current fleet to be replaced service, rest Poland by new tanks after 2010 in reserve. I Quantity Country Type Origin Notes (Estimated) No standing army. NATO is mostly responsible for defense affairs. Iceland Indigenous peacekeeping force, coast guard, special operations unit and national police force exist. India The Indian Army ordered 124 'Arjun' Mk1 MBTs in 2000 and placed another order for additional 124 'Arjun' Mk1 MBTs and 124 Arjun MBT 248 India 'Arjun' Mk2 MBTs in 2010, after Arjun tank had conclusively outperformed the T- 90.[14][15] Indian Army is set to acquire 124 Arjun Mk2 tanks as a 6 follow-on order, according to the Defence Minister.[16] Procured in three separate orders. Two batches (310 tanks and knockdown kits in 2000 and a further 300 in 2006[17]) were [1] Russia T-90 ~907 purchased from Russia. A further India 1000 were to be produced locally by 2020. Of those, the first batch of 10 were delivered in August 2009.[18][19] Soviet Upgraded to advanced Ajeya Mk1 [20] Union and MK2 standard mainly based T-72 2,414 Poland on Polish PT-91 Twardy Tank India features developed by DRDO Indonesia Leopard 42 Germany Partially arrived from Germany 2A4 Leopard 2 - On order - Up-armored and up- 61 Germany Revolution rated version of Leopard 2A4 [21] Iran United M48A5 80 States United M60 150 States Chieftain United 400 MK3 Kingdom Soviet T-62 75 Union Soviet T-72 780 Union Poland Zulfiqar 100+ Iran MBT Iraq Soviet T-55 72 Union Soviet T-72 180 Union Poland M1A1 United On order - Yet to be delivered, DU 140 Abrams States armor removed. [22] Israel Merkava 250 Israel Mk.1 Merkava 580 Israel Mk.2 7 Merkava 750 Israel Mk.3 Merkava 320 Israel Additional 300 to be delivered Mk.4 United Magach 5 561 States/ Upgraded M60 tank Israel United Magach 6 711 States/ Upgraded M60 tank Israel United Magach 7 111 States/ Upgraded M60 tank Israel Italy Ariete 200 Italy Germany/ Leopard 1 120 Some license produced in Italy Italy J Quantity Country Type Origin Notes (Estimated) Japan Type 74 561 Japan Type 90 315 Japan Type 10 13 Japan Jordan Centurion. Most of which were United Tariq 292 modified into Temsah heavy Kingdom armoured personnel carriers. United M60A3 250 Modernized by KADDB States United Khaled 274 Chieftain Kingdom Challenger United 392 1 Kingdom K Quantity Country Type Origin Notes (Estimated) Kazakhstan Soviet T-55 540 Union Soviet T-62 75 Union Soviet T-72 650 Union Kenya Vickers United 76 Mk 3 Kingdom 8 Soviet T-72Av 110 Union Korea, North Soviet T-54 1,600 Union Soviet T-62 800 Union Type 500 China 59 Chonm North 1,000 a-ho Korea Pokpoo North 300 ng-Ho Korea Korea, M48A3 United 300 South K States M48A5 United K1, M4 500 States 8A5K2 South Korea was given 33 T-80Us T- during 1996 and 1997 and 2 T- Soviet 80U, T- 35 80UKs in 2005 as a partial interest Union 80UK payment of Russian debts incurred during the Soviet era. K1, K1 Republic 1,027 K1, 484 K1A1, K1A2 to be A1, K1 1,511 of Korea delivered. A2 K2 Republic Mass production scheduled in Black 206 of Korea 2013. Total 206 to be delivered. Panther Kuwait M-84D 150 Yugoslavia United M1A2 218 DU armor removed. States Kyrgyzstan Soviet T-72 210 Union L Quantity Country Type Origin Notes (Estimated) Laos Soviet T-55 30 Union Latvia Soviet T-55 3 Union Lebanon Soviet T-55 205 Union 9 United M48A5 104 States United M60A3 66 States Leopard 43 Germany 1A5 Libya Large numbers of tanks destroyed Soviet by NATO bombings and rebel T-55 1,500 Union actions during 2011 Libyan civil war Soviet T-62 350 Union Soviet T-72 315 Union Military force is abolished, but police force exists to maintain internal Liechtenstein security.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Firing US 120Mm Tank Ammunition in the Leopard 2 Main Battle Tank
    An advanced weapon and space systems company Firing US 120mm Tank Ammunition in the Leopard 2 Main Battle Tank NDIA Guns and Missiles Conference Harlan Huls 22 April 2008 1_T105713Cauthor.ppt 04/03/20001 1 Agenda An advanced weapon and space systems company 1. Overview of tanks and ammunition • Interoperability of the weapon and ammunition 2. Objectives of the test conducted in Denmark 3. Results of the firings in Leopard 2 with L44 and L55 weapon system 4. Conclusions 2 Description of US Tank Ammunition An advanced weapon and space systems company US 120mm Tank Ammunition Types M1028 KEWA2™ M829A3 M830A1 M1002 M831A1 M830 M908 M865 Canister APFSDS-T APFSDS-T HEAT-MP-T TPMP-T TP-T HEAT-MP-T HE-OR-T TPCSDS-T Several US ammunition types with interoperability maintained through International JCB by controlling interface features (ICD) 3 Abrams and Leopard 2 MBT With 120mm Smoothbore Cannon An advanced weapon and space systems company Leopard 2 Tanks Abrams Tanks Leo2A6 L55 Weapon (Dutch) M1A1 Abrams Leo2A5 (M256 ~ L44 Weapon) L44 Weapon (Danish) Leo2A4 M1A2 Abrams L44 Weapon (M256 ~ L44 Weapon) Several MBT configurations with 120mm weapon. Interoperability is maintained through international JCB by controlling interface features (ICD) 4 120mm Smoothbore Compatible Platforms An advanced weapon and space systems company Platform Picture Type and Country Caliber Basic Tactical Training Comments Load Rounds Rounds M1A1 Abrams 44 40 M829A3 M865 Training and USA, Australia, rounds M829A2 M831A1 Tactical designed M829A1 for 120mm Kuwait, Egypt
    [Show full text]
  • Commonality in Military Equipment
    THE ARTS This PDF document was made available CHILD POLICY from www.rand.org as a public service of CIVIL JUSTICE the RAND Corporation. EDUCATION ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT Jump down to document6 HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit NATIONAL SECURITY research organization providing POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY objective analysis and effective SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY solutions that address the challenges SUBSTANCE ABUSE facing the public and private sectors TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY around the world. TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE Support RAND WORKFORCE AND WORKPLACE Purchase this document Browse Books & Publications Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore the RAND Arroyo Center View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. This product is part of the RAND Corporation monograph series. RAND monographs present major research findings that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND mono- graphs undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity. Commonality in Military Equipment A Framework to Improve Acquisition Decisions Thomas Held, Bruce Newsome, Matthew W.
    [Show full text]
  • Progress in Delivering the British Army's Armoured
    AVF0014 Written evidence submitted by Nicholas Drummond “Progress in Delivering the British Army’s Armoured Vehicle Capability.” Nicholas Drummond Defence Industry Consultant and Commentator Aura Consulting Ltd. ______________________________________________________________________________ _________ Contents Section 1 - Introduction Section 2 - HCDC questions 1. Does the Army have a clear understanding of how it will employ its armoured vehicles in future operations? 2. Given the delays to its programmes, will the Army be able to field the Strike Brigades and an armoured division as envisaged by the 2015 SDSR? 3. How much has the Army spent on procuring armoured vehicles over the last 20 years? How many vehicles has it procured with this funding? 4. What other capabilities has the Army sacrificed in order to fund overruns in its core armoured vehicles programmes? 5. How flexible can the Army be in adapting its current armoured vehicle plans to the results of the Integrated Review? 6. By 2025 will the Army be able to match the potential threat posed by peer adversaries? 7. Is the Army still confident that the Warrior CSP can deliver an effective vehicle capability for the foreseeable future? 8. To what extent does poor contractor performance explain the delays to the Warrior and Ajax programmes? 9. Should the UK have a land vehicles industrial strategy, and if so what benefits would this bring? 10. What sovereign capability for the design and production of armoured vehicles does the UK retain? 11. Does it make sense to upgrade the Challenger 2 when newer, more capable vehicles may be available from our NATO allies? 12. What other key gaps are emerging within the Army’s armoured vehicle capability? 13.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Exhibits at IWM Duxford
    List of exhibits at IWM Duxford Aircraft Airco/de Havilland DH9 (AS; IWM) de Havilland DH 82A Tiger Moth (Ex; Spectrum Leisure Airspeed Ambassador 2 (EX; DAS) Ltd/Classic Wings) Airspeed AS40 Oxford Mk 1 (AS; IWM) de Havilland DH 82A Tiger Moth (AS; IWM) Avro 683 Lancaster Mk X (AS; IWM) de Havilland DH 100 Vampire TII (BoB; IWM) Avro 698 Vulcan B2 (AS; IWM) Douglas Dakota C-47A (AAM; IWM) Avro Anson Mk 1 (AS; IWM) English Electric Canberra B2 (AS; IWM) Avro Canada CF-100 Mk 4B (AS; IWM) English Electric Lightning Mk I (AS; IWM) Avro Shackleton Mk 3 (EX; IWM) Fairchild A-10A Thunderbolt II ‘Warthog’ (AAM; USAF) Avro York C1 (AS; DAS) Fairchild Bolingbroke IVT (Bristol Blenheim) (A&S; Propshop BAC 167 Strikemaster Mk 80A (CiA; IWM) Ltd/ARC) BAC TSR-2 (AS; IWM) Fairey Firefly Mk I (FA; ARC) BAe Harrier GR3 (AS; IWM) Fairey Gannet ECM6 (AS4) (A&S; IWM) Beech D17S Staggerwing (FA; Patina Ltd/TFC) Fairey Swordfish Mk III (AS; IWM) Bell UH-1H (AAM; IWM) FMA IA-58A Pucará (Pucara) (CiA; IWM) Boeing B-17G Fortress (CiA; IWM) Focke Achgelis Fa-330 (A&S; IWM) Boeing B-17G Fortress Sally B (FA) (Ex; B-17 Preservation General Dynamics F-111E (AAM; USAF Museum) Ltd)* General Dynamics F-111F (cockpit capsule) (AAM; IWM) Boeing B-29A Superfortress (AAM; United States Navy) Gloster Javelin FAW9 (BoB; IWM) Boeing B-52D Stratofortress (AAM; IWM) Gloster Meteor F8 (BoB; IWM) BoeingStearman PT-17 Kaydet (AAM; IWM) Grumman F6F-5 Hellcat (FA; Patina Ltd/TFC) Branson/Lindstrand Balloon Capsule (Virgin Atlantic Flyer Grumman F8F-2P Bearcat (FA; Patina Ltd/TFC)
    [Show full text]
  • Characteristics of Torsion Bar Suspension Elasticity in Mbts and the Assessment of Realized Solutions
    Scientific-Technical Review,vol.LIII,no.2,2003 67 UDC: 623.438.3(047)=20 COSATI: 19-03, 20-11 Characteristics of torsion bar suspension elasticity in MBTs and the assessment of realized solutions Rade Stevanović, BSc (Eng)1) On the basis of available data and known equations, basic parameters of suspension systems in a number of main bat- tle tanks with torsion bar suspension are determined. On the basis of the conclusions obtained from the presented graphs and the table, the characteristics of torsion bar suspension elasticity in some main types of tanks are assessed. Key words: main battle tank, suspension, torsion bar, elasticity, work load capacity. Principal symbols Union), the US and Germany, in one type of French and one Japanese main battle tank, and in some British tanks for a – swing arm length export as well. All other producers from other countries, c – torsion bar spring rate whose main battle tanks had the torsion bar suspension, Crs – reduced torsion bar spring rate in the static wheel mainly used the licence or the experience of the previously position, suspension characteristic derivate in the mentioned countries. static wheel position The characteristics of torsion bar suspension systems in d – torsion bar diameter main battle tanks in serial production until the 60s for the fd – positive vertical spring travel, static-to-bump use in NATO forces (M-47 and M-48) and the Warsaw movement Treaty countries (T-54 and T-55), were of nearly the same fs, fm – rebound and total vertical spring travel (low) level, but still higher than the British tank Centurion Fs – vertical wheel load on the road wheel in the static characteristics, with BOGEY suspension, which was also wheel position in serial production at that time.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Financial Results INTRODUCTION
    2019 Financial Results INTRODUCTION Turkey’s the largest private and 100% domestically owned company in defense industry A global company, intellectual property rights belong to itself and its products are in use on 5 continents as well as in more than 60 countries Turkey’s leading supplier and exporter of land platforms For the 11th time, the market leader in the total segments in which it operates 1 1 VISION & MISSION Vision Otokar’s vision is to preserve the local and national identity of its products by developing technologies in-house, also to provide continued satisfaction for its clients, employees, and shareholders with total excellence philosophy. Mission Otokar’s primary mission is to design, manufacture and market commercial vehicles and various defense industry products with global competitive strength, all developed to meet customer expectations. 2 2 BRIEF HISTORY 1963 1970s 1980s 1990s 2000s 2010s . Establishment .Turkey’s first .Production of .Military armoured .Merge with the .Establishment of Otokar . Production of interciy bus 4x4 tactical vehicles by own İstanbul Fruehauf Europe (OESAS) buses under .The first Turkish vehicle under desing A.S. .Multi-wheeled armoured the license of Armoured the license of .Turkey’s first .Production of small tactical vehicle family Magirus-Deutz Vehicle Land Rover export of tactical and mid size buses .Production of City Buses production armoured vehicle .Production of .Turkey’s first electric bus Turkey’s first hybrid .Atlas Light Truck .Partnering with .Sakarya bus .Introduced new armoured Koç Group plant/factory .The prime contractor tactical wheeled vehicle, URAL of ALTAY Project .Tracked Armoured Vehicle TULPAR .POYRAZ midibus .Establishment of Otokar Land Systems (OLS) in U.A.E .Turkey’s first electric armoured vehicle, AKREP Iıe .Establishment of Otokar Central Asia Limited (OCAL) 3 OVERVIEW Koç Holding USD 340 MILLION 45% EXPORT REVENUES IN 2019 FOUNDED IN 1963 SHAREHOLDING Ünver Holding A.Ş.
    [Show full text]
  • Army Guide Monthly • Issue #5 (152)
    Army G uide monthly # 5 (152) May 2017 BAE Teams With Ray Service to Support Swedish Mjolner Mortar Program NIOA joins Rheinmetall Defence Land 400 Team General Dynamics European Land Systems demonstrates the PIRANHA 8X8 Wheeled Armoured Vehicle to the Bulgarian Army Otokar showcases 15 vehicles at IDEF 2017 Supacat wins Queen’s Award for International Trade for Outstanding Short Term Growth FNSS Showcases the Future of Land Platforms at IDEF 2017 Oshkosh Defense Delivers Proposal For FMTV A2 Production L&T Wins Largest Private Sector Defence Order for Artillery Guns Elbit Systems Presents SPEAR MK2 – Latest Version of the Fully Autonomous Mortar System for Lightweight Combat Vehicles General Dynamics European Land Systems handover the first PIRANHA Wheeled Armoured Vehicle to Denmark The 8x8 CAESAR® artillery system has been selected by Denmark to equip the Danish land forces www.army-guide.com Army Guide Monthly • #5 (152) • May 2017 Defence Industry Rheinmetall Defence Australia today announced Brisbane-based NIOA as the company’s key supplier BAE Teams With Ray Service to Support of ammunition and armament services for its Land Swedish Mjolner Mortar Program 400 Phase 2 offer to the Commonwealth of Australia. The partnership between the two companies is underpinned by a commercial relationship spanning 20 years and a shared commitment towards placing BAE Systems has contracted Czech manufacturer Australian Industry Capability at the centre of Ray Service to deliver key components for the Rheinmetall’s offer to deliver the BOXER CRV
    [Show full text]
  • Tank Gunnery
    Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com MHI Copy 3 FM 17-12 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY FIELD MANUAL TANK GUNNERY HEADQUARTERS, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NOVEMBER 1964 Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com PREPARE TO FIRE Instructional Card (M41A3, M48, and M60 Tanks) TANK COMMANDER GUNNER DRIVER LOADER Commond: PREPARE TO Observe looder's actionr in Cleon periscopes, Check indicotor tape for FIRE. making check of replenisher in. lower seat, close proper amount of recoil oil Inspect coaxial machine- dicotor tope. Clean nd inspect hoatch, nd turn in replenilher. Check posi- gun ond telescope ports gunner s direct-fire sights. Check on master switch. tion of breechblock crank to ensure gun shield operaoion of sight covers if op. stop. Open breech (assisted cover is correctly posi- cable. Check instrument lights. by gunner); inspect cham- tioned ond clomps are Assist loader in opening breech. ber ond tube, and clote secure. Clean exterior breech. Check coxial lenses and vision devices. mochinegun and adjust and clean ond inspect head space if opplicble. commander's direct-fire Check coaxial machinegun sight(s). Inspect cupolao mount ond odjust solenoid. sowed ammunilion if Inspect turret-stowed am. applicable. munitlon. Command: CHECK FIR- Ploce main gun safety in FIRE Start auxiliary Place moin gun safety ING SWITCHES. position if located on right side engine (moin en- in FIREposition if loated If main gun has percus- of gun. Turn gun switch ON. gin. if tank has on left side of gun. If sion mechanism, cock gun Check firing triggers on power no auxiliary en- moin gun hoaspercussion for eoch firing check if control handle if applicable.
    [Show full text]
  • Merit International
    Table of Contents By Brand (Click logo to jump to page) AFV-AC14401 AFV-AC32001 1/144 STICKER FOR SIMULATING SENSORS 1/32 Have Glass II for AC12105 AFV-AC32005 AFV-AC35001 1/32 F117A for TP03219 1/35 M41 GUN SHIELD COVER AFV-AC35002 AFV-AC35003 1/35 CLEARANCE INDICATOR POLES ZIMMERIT COATING APPLICATOR AFV-AC35004 AFV-AC35005 1/35 TRANSPARENT PERISCOPE FOR TIGER I LATE VERSION 1/35 TRANSPARENT PERISCOPE FOR SD.KFZ.251 SERIES AFV-AC35006 AFV-AC35008 1/35 GERMAN OPTICAL EQUIPMENT SET 1/35 MANTLET COVER FOR CENTURION (TYPE A) AFV-AC35015 AFV-AC35021 STICKER FOR SIMULATING ANTI REFLECTION COATING 1/35 CAMOUFLAGE NET - SNOW GRAY LENS(LEOPARD) AFV-AC35201 AFV-AC35206 PC. PANEL FOR SIMULATING MODERN VEHICLE (AIRCRAFT) ANTI-SLIP COATING STICKERS FOR VEHICLE TANK AFV-AF02007 AFV-AF02008 PZKPFW VI AUSF B TIGER II LEOPARD II A5 AFV-AF02009 AFV-AF02010 M1A2 ABRAMS TYPE 90 MBT AFV-AF10001 AFV-AF12101 1/100 MIG-25 1/12 Elementary school desk w/chairs AFV-AF12102 AFV-AF35015 1/12 High school single seat desks w/chairs 1/35 M18 Hellcat AFV-AF35016 AFV-AF35019 1/35 NATO YPR-765 AIFV(25m TURRET) 1/35 M3 STUART T16 TRACK (WORKABLE) AFV-AF35020 AFV-AF35021 1/35 M5/M8 LIGHT TANK T36E6 TRK(WORKABL) 1/35 ANTI-TANK WEAPONS M40A1 & TOW A1 AFV-AF35022 AFV-AF35026 1/35 LVTP-5 US MARINES VIETNAM 1/35 M4/M3 T51 TRACK(WORKABLE) AFV-AF35036 AFV-AF35041 1/35 M26/M46 T80E1 TRACK 1/35 M41 WALKER BULLDOG LT TANK AFV-AF35044 AFV-AF35047 1/35 SDKFZ 11 TRACK (WORKABLE) 1/35 SDKFZ 11 LATE VERSION - WOOD CAB AFV-AF35050 AFV-AF35052 1/35(terminated) FH18 105MM CANNON 1/35 M41
    [Show full text]
  • Explosive Weapon Effectsweapon Overview Effects
    CHARACTERISATION OF EXPLOSIVE WEAPONS EXPLOSIVEEXPLOSIVE WEAPON EFFECTSWEAPON OVERVIEW EFFECTS FINAL REPORT ABOUT THE GICHD AND THE PROJECT The Geneva International Centre for Humanitarian Demining (GICHD) is an expert organisation working to reduce the impact of mines, cluster munitions and other explosive hazards, in close partnership with states, the UN and other human security actors. Based at the Maison de la paix in Geneva, the GICHD employs around 55 staff from over 15 countries with unique expertise and knowledge. Our work is made possible by core contributions, project funding and in-kind support from more than 20 governments and organisations. Motivated by its strategic goal to improve human security and equipped with subject expertise in explosive hazards, the GICHD launched a research project to characterise explosive weapons. The GICHD perceives the debate on explosive weapons in populated areas (EWIPA) as an important humanitarian issue. The aim of this research into explosive weapons characteristics and their immediate, destructive effects on humans and structures, is to help inform the ongoing discussions on EWIPA, intended to reduce harm to civilians. The intention of the research is not to discuss the moral, political or legal implications of using explosive weapon systems in populated areas, but to examine their characteristics, effects and use from a technical perspective. The research project started in January 2015 and was guided and advised by a group of 18 international experts dealing with weapons-related research and practitioners who address the implications of explosive weapons in the humanitarian, policy, advocacy and legal fields. This report and its annexes integrate the research efforts of the characterisation of explosive weapons (CEW) project in 2015-2016 and make reference to key information sources in this domain.
    [Show full text]
  • Logistics Aspects of Weapon Systems Modernization
    5 =) 1 # 9 1230 4 ' t 9 LOGISTICS ASPECTS OF 9EAPON SYSTEMS MODERNI7ATION Kazimierz KOWAL2KI, Wiktor BIERNIKOWI0Z, Jacek RL0ZLN2KI, MacieB 2ZUKAL2KI ,ULF - general Tadeusz Cosciuszko ,ilitar0 Universit0 of Land Forces, Facult0 of ,anagement, Logistics 1epartment, DroclaA, Republic of Poland, EU, [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] Abstract 1roblems of logistics support of weapon systems in their life cycle operation and support phase, especially considering its moderni.ation are presented in the paper. In the introduction inevitability of the moderni.ation process of crucial weapon systems was emphasi.ed. Furthermore, the concept of weapon system, life cycle of the weapon system and moderni.ation of weapon systems where presented. A general description of a model of the process of creating the plan of technical moderni.ation of the 1olish armed forces was also presented. The main part of the article presents the areas of logistics that should be newly tailored to the needs of the moderni.ed weapon system. These basic areas includeA processes of operation and maintenance, material and technical supplies, staff ac,uisition, availability of service devices, creation of databases, organi.ation of trainings, computeri.ation, logistics infrastructure, dedicated transport means. The main conclusion of the article is to emphasi.e the fact that the moderni.ation of weapon systems entails not only the costs of moderni.ing a specific type of weapon 3tan), infantry fighting vehicle4 but also the costs of logistic support in operation and maintenance phase of their life cycle. eywords: Weapon system, life cycle, moderni.ation, logistic 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Zbrojní Průmysl Zemí V4 a Jeho Perspektivy Diplomová Práce
    MASARYKOVA UNIVERZITA V BRNĚ Fakulta sociálních studií Katedra politologie Zbrojní průmysl zemí V4 a jeho perspektivy Diplomová práce Bc. Erik Jurásek (UČO 414727) Bezpečnostní a strategická studia Magisterské navazující studium imatrikulační ročník 2015 Vedoucí práce: Mgr. Josef Kraus, Ph.D. V Brně 30. 5. 2017 Prohlášení o autorství práce Prohlašuji, že jsem diplomovou práci na téma Zbrojní průmysl zemí V4 a jeho perspektivy vypracoval samostatně a použil jen zdroje uvedené v seznamu literatury. V Brně, 30. 5. 2017 ……………………………………………………. podpis Na tomto místě bych rád poděkoval Mgr. Josefovi Krausovi, Ph.D., za odborné vedení diplomové práce, cenné připomínky a za čas strávený při konzultacích. ANOTACE Diplomová práce se zabývá zbrojním průmyslem Visegrádské skupiny s primárním důrazem na léta 2006–2016. Cílem práce je komplexní zpracování této tematiky a nástin možných budoucích perspektiv spolupráce z toho vyplývajících. Teoretická část práce představuje klíčové pojmy zbrojního průmyslu za účelem pochopení podstaty zkoumané problematiky. Na základě analýzy dosavadní zbrojně-průmyslové spolupráce na úrovni organizací V4, NATO a EU a posléze komparace zemí V4 dle definovaných indikátorů ve stanoveném časovém horizontu 2006–2016 jsou přiblíženy oblasti možné spolupráce v letech nadcházejících. Klíčová slova: Armáda, Česká republika, Maďarsko, obranný průmysl, Polsko, Slovensko, V4, zbrojní průmysl ABSTRACT Diploma thesis deals with arms industry of Visegrad Group with the main emphasis on the years 2006–2016. The goal of this work is complex processing of this theme and outline of possible future perspectives of cooperation. Theoretical part presents key concepts of arms industry for the purpose of understanding substance of researching issues. On the basis of analysis of existing arms industrial cooperation on the Visegrad Group, NATO and EU level and subsequent comparison of Visegrad Group countries on the basis of defined indicators in time horizon 2006–2016, areas of possible cooperation in the upcoming years are clarified.
    [Show full text]