DOCSLIB.ORG

800 Mhz Radio System Public Safety Radio System Migration

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
800 Mhz Radio System Public Safety Radio System Migration 800 MHz Radio System Public Safety Radio System Migration System Use History of system System Configuration Proposed migration plan Public Safety Radio System 2013 Activity 19,405,644 transmissions in 2013 • Sheriff’s Office 8,266,598 = 47% • Fire* and EMS 4,471,845 = 25% • County Government 2,943,209 = 17% • City of Naples 1,551,858 = 9% • City of Marco 432,088 = 2% * 5 independent, 2 County, and 2 municipal fire departments 38 Agencies and government departments System supports 4200 mobile and portable radios Public Safety Radio System History & Cost 1994 - System RFP & contract $8.3 mil 1995 - 1996 Construction & loading 1999 - City of Naples added to $100k system 2002 - Simulcast expansion rural $1.375 mil fringe 2007 - Simulcast technology Upgrade $4.5 mil 2008 - ESC including CCSO 9-1-1 $2.9 mil Included site technology upgrades 800 MHz System Configuration 12 Sites utilizing 41 channels Redundant site at the ESC System Command and Control at County Barn Site and the ESC All Sites are linked with a digital microwave network 2 911 centers with 16 dispatch consoles - CCSO and NPD Public Safety Radio System Technology Trunked Radio System • Channels are shared among all users = efficient use of available frequency spectrum • Users are divided into talk groups not assigned to specific channels • System assigns groups to available channels • System establishes communication privacy • Improves cross agency communications • Provides group/user priority for access during busy times What is Trunking ? Computerized Channel Assignment Conventional Approach Trunked Approach Bank Tellers SALES COUNTER SALES COUNTER Being Served System channels are shared not dedicated to a user Obstacles to Signal Propagation 3 watt 35 watt Public Safety Radio System Technology Current system has been use for 18 years, approaching end of life in 2017 Technology protocols are changing What's Next? – P25 Phase 2 • P25 is a suite of standards for digital radio systems • Released in 1995 and the standards continue to evolve • P 25 standards offer improved interoperability between systems and different vendors equipment • P25 Phase 2 standards improve system performance and capabilities Strong federal support of P25 technology through grants and federal purchasing requirements Public Safety Radio System Technology Migration Gradual migration – immediate improvement for public safety and maximizing existing investment FY 14 upgrades • Two equipment shelters • Replacement of three battery back up systems • Replacement of three site generators • Radio system command and control hardware that will integrate current and future technology FY 14 efforts will include an interim solution to improve portable radio coverage in North Naples that will transition to a P25 site in FY 15 Public Safety Radio System Technology Migration FY 15 site component replacement and migration of public safety users FY 16 to FY 18 complete installation of site components and migration of system users Anticipated five year cost is $15 million The system vendor is offering pricing concessions for existing customers keeping us on budget The State of Florida Contract pricing remains in effect until 2021 Future Considerations • System users have identified the following topics as areas for future action: • Establish standards for in building coverage by ordinance or inclusion in the LDC • Identify areas where additional system resources will be needed due to growth • Utilization of impact fees for funding radio system expansion and improvements 800 MHz Maintenance Radio repair services are available 24 hours a day for any system issue System infrastructure is regularly checked according to established maintenance schedules Mobile and portable radios require annual maintenance checks Radio software is periodically updated to resolve issues/improve performance Public Safety Radio System Questions ??? John Daly Telecommunications Manager 239-252-2531 [email protected] Backup Materials Background: The FCC’s release of 800 MHz frequencies in the 1970s provided for the development of public safety communications systems with significantly improved capabilities over existing systems of that era. The Law Enforcement Assistance Administration initiated a project to develop the capabilities and standards needed in a trunked radio system. This project was a joint effort with Association of Public Safety Communications Officials (APCO) and became known as APCO Project 16. The Project 16 standards released in 1979 included: Channel access time Unit and group addressing Unit and group priority Data systems interface Individuality of system users Command and control flexibility System growth capability Frequency use Reliability APCO Project 16 addressed operational and functional requirements not technical requirements. As a result manufacturers developed proprietary systems to meet the standards. Collier County’s EDACS system is compliant with Project 16 standards. The system was implemented in 1995 with users transitioning to the system in 1996. With periodic upgrades to expand system coverage, improve technology, and replace obsolete components, the system will serve Collier for at least twenty years. The user base has expanded from 1600 radios in 1996 to 4,200 today generating 1.7 million radio transmissions monthly. In 1989 in response to Congressional and FCC direction; APCO formed a working group known as APCO Project 25 (P25) to establish standards for digital two way radio communications for public safety. Unlike Project 16, Project 25 was tasked with developing technical requirements not just performance standards with the primary goals of improving interoperability among public safety agencies and efficient use of radio frequency spectrum. The Project 25 committee includes; local, state, and federal public safety representatives, representatives from Federal technical agencies and telecommunications industry representatives. The standards released in the 1995 continue to evolve and Project 25 is an ANSI (American National Standards Institute) standard. The attached white paper from LR Kimball written for a county in Pennsylvania provides detailed background on P25. Project 25 Phase 2 standards improve performance in several areas including more efficient use of frequency spectrum and a migration to a Project 25 Phase 2 system is the recommended migration path for Collier County. What do we do next? As a result of a variety of actions including federal procurement requirements for communication equipment, federal grant guidance, regulatory actions and technology innovations, the Project 25 standard has emerged as the as the choice for public safety radio system technology. SAFECOM, which is an emergency communications program in the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), provides communications grant guidance for federal agencies awarding grants and grant applicants. SAFECOM guidance specifically states that “grantees should target funding toward standards–based equipment that enables the entity to support implementation of Project 25 equipment for mission critical voice”. This link will take you to the SAFECOM grant guidance document: http://216.81.81.251/SiteCollectionDocuments/2013_SAFECOM_Guidance_Feb_22_FINAL.PDF Several agencies in Collier have been successful applying for federal communication equipment grants and purchased multi-mode portable and mobile radios compatible with the County’s current technology and P25 to prepare for system migration and interoperability with P25 systems as they are implemented. Agencies purchasing new or replacement radios are also purchasing multi-mode radios to achieve the same goal. There is an expectation that future grant guidance from SAFECOM may require that the radio system the radios operate on be P25 compliant also. Without a migration plan in place the agencies in using the Collier system may be denied grants if the SAFECOM guidance is changed. P25 radio systems are replacing legacy radio systems not just as a response to the P25 standard but also due to technology evolution. Just as we see in data networks and telephone systems the technology protocols that drive these systems are changing to provide additional capabilities and reliability. In radio we see the same situation and with the development of the P25 standard manufactures are dedicating research and design resources to the standards process. With commercial systems and the developing national broad band network unable to support mission critical public safety voice communications for the immediate future, it is necessary to plan for and fund upgrades for the public safety radio system. The backbone of the next system must be able to fully support and operate the legacy voice radio system Collier currently utilizes until it is no longer needed, a P25 phase 2 voice radio system as users are migrate to it, LTE data, and interface with other external legacy or standards based systems as needed using the core P25 capabilities. The interface between the current legacy system and P25 must support all current features of the legacy system; unit ID, radio priority, emergency, patching of groups; and seamless integration of the talk groups resident on each system. With funding in place the considerations that will be evaluated are as we plan implementation are: How soon will Collier Public Safety responders need P25 capability to improve interoperability? Numerous counties in Florida including Miami-Dade, Volusia County, Hillsborough,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • UBCD3600XLT Owner’S Manual
    UBCD3600XLT Owner’s Manual Printed in Vietnam U01UB376BZZ(0) IMPORTANT NOTE ABOUT THIS MANUAL Radio Reference database for use in North America ONLY. NOTE The AMBE+2™ voice coding Technology embodied in this product is protected by intellectual property rights including patent rights, copyrights and trade secrets of Digital Voice Systems, Inc. microSD is a registered trademark of SanDisk Corporation. HomePatrol is a registered trademark of Uniden America Corporation, Irving, Texas. CONTENTS IMPORTANT INFORMATION . .. 1 MODIFICATION NOTICE . 1 GENERAL PRECAUTIONS . 1 Earphone Warning . 1 Liquid Exposure Warning . 1 Power Disconnection Caution . 1 INTRODUCTION . 2 CREATE FAVORITES LISTS . 2 AVOID TRANSMISSIONS . 2 REPLAY TRANSMISSIONS . 2 RECORD TRANSMISSIONS . 2 MAIN FEATURES . 2 INCLUDED WITH YOUR SCANNER . 5 USING INTERNAL BATTERIES . 6 Using Rechargeable Batteries . 6 UNDERSTANDING THE MEMORY . 6 FAVORITES LISTS . 6 SYSTEMS . 7 TRUNKING SITES . 7 DEPARTMENTS . 7 SENTINEL SOFTWARE . 7 MANAGE PROFILES . 7 MANAGE FAVORITES LISTS . 7 HOW TO INSTALL SENTINEL SOFTWARE . 7 UPDATING FIRMWARE . 7 SETTING UP YOUR SCANNER . 9 TURN ON THE SCANNER . 9 KEYPAD CONTROLS . 10 SET YOUR LOCATION AND RANGE . 13 SET LOCATION . 13 SET RANGE . 13 UNDERSTANDING RANGE . 13 EDIT LOCATION . 13 SELECTING SERVICE TYPES . 14 NAVIGATING THE MENUS . 15 DATA NAMING . 15 DISPLAY MENU . 15 A Look at the Display . 16 SETTINGS MENU . 20 Adjust Key Beep . 20 Battery Option . 20 Band Defaults . 20 Auto Shutoff . 20 Set Clock . 20 Replay Options . 21 Restore Options . 21 See Scanner Information . 21 Keypad Lock . 21 KEY CONCEPTS . .22 QUICK KEYS . 22 FAVORITES LIST QUICK KEYS . 22 SYSTEM QUICK KEYS. 22 DEPARTMENT QUICK KEYS . 22 SEARCH KEYS .
    [Show full text]
  • Internet of Things Data Foundations for First Responders Fire Service FY2020 May 6, 2020
    Internet of Things Data Foundations for First Responders Fire Service FY2020 May 6, 2020 1 Internet of Things Data Foundations for First Responders FY2020 September 30, 2020 Work performed in support of the: Department of Homeland Security Science and Technology Directorate Office for Interoperability and Compatibility U.S. Department of Commerce Public Safety Communications Research Program Contacts: Alison Kahn Personal Area Networks Project Lead [email protected] | 303-497-3523 Peter Hallenbeck Softwhere Syzygy, LLC Deputy Chief (Ret.) Efland Volunteer Fire Dept., Efland, NC [email protected] Sam L. Ray PSCR Portfolio Lead—DHS [email protected] | 303-497-3262 NIST-CTL PSCR Division 325 Broadway Boulder, CO 80305 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents .......................................................................................................................................... 3 Table of Figures ............................................................................................................................................. 4 1 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................... 5 2 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Challenges in a First responder Environment ............................................................................... 7 2.2 Other Standards and Data Sets ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • What Futuristic Technology Means for First Responders: Voices from the Field
    What Futuristic Technology Means for First Responders: Voices from the Field B Shaneé Dawkins( ) , Kerrianne Morrison , Yee-Yin Choong , and Kristen Greene National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA {shanee.dawkins,kerrianne.morrison,yee-yin.choong, kristen.greene}@nist.gov Abstract. The public safety communication technology landscape in the United States (U.S.) is evolving to supplement the use of land mobile radios with a broader spectrum of communication technologies for use on the newly created Nationwide Public Safety Broadband Network. The goal of the multi-phase research study presented here was to understand the use of communication technologies by the population of first responders—Communications (Comm) Center & 9-1-1 Ser- vices; Emergency Medical Services; Fire Services; and Law Enforcement. The sequential, exploratory mixed methods study consisted of an initial exploratory qualitative phase followed by a larger quantitative phase. The qualitative data collection was via in-depth interviews with 193 first responders across the U.S.; the quantitative survey was completed by 7,182 first responders across the U.S. This paper presents the results of the study related to first responders’ percep- tions about the future of public safety communication technology. Discussed are the technologies first responders think would benefit their individual user popu- lations, as well as communication technologies that would be useful across user populations within the public safety domain. Results show that first responders are open to new and exciting technologies, but their needs are utility driven; to have the biggest impact, their communication technology must be tailored to their needs and contexts.
    [Show full text]
  • Communications Technology Assessment for the Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) Control and Non-Payload Communications (CNPC) Link
    NASA/CR—2014-216675 Communications Technology Assessment for the Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) Control and Non-Payload Communications (CNPC) Link Steven C. Bretmersky MTI Systems, Inc., Cleveland, Ohio William D. Bishop Verizon Federal Network Systems, LLC., Arlington, Virginia Justin E. Dailey MTI Systems, Inc., Cleveland, Ohio Christine T. Chevalier Vantage Partners, LLC, Brook Park, Ohio June 2014 NASA STI Program . in Profi le Since its founding, NASA has been dedicated to the • CONFERENCE PUBLICATION. Collected advancement of aeronautics and space science. The papers from scientifi c and technical NASA Scientifi c and Technical Information (STI) conferences, symposia, seminars, or other program plays a key part in helping NASA maintain meetings sponsored or cosponsored by NASA. this important role. • SPECIAL PUBLICATION. Scientifi c, The NASA STI Program operates under the auspices technical, or historical information from of the Agency Chief Information Offi cer. It collects, NASA programs, projects, and missions, often organizes, provides for archiving, and disseminates concerned with subjects having substantial NASA’s STI. The NASA STI program provides access public interest. to the NASA Aeronautics and Space Database and its public interface, the NASA Technical Reports • TECHNICAL TRANSLATION. English- Server, thus providing one of the largest collections language translations of foreign scientifi c and of aeronautical and space science STI in the world. technical material pertinent to NASA’s mission. Results are published in both non-NASA channels and by NASA in the NASA STI Report Series, which Specialized services also include creating custom includes the following report types: thesauri, building customized databases, organizing and publishing research results. • TECHNICAL PUBLICATION.
    [Show full text]
  • NIST, Information Technology Laboratory (ITL) Public Safety
    Public Safety Survey on Communication Technology: FF Welcome to the Public Safety Survey on Communication Technology Help us get requirements for public safety technology right! This is your chance to tell us what works, what doesn't, and what technology you think would be useful for incident response communications. NIST, the National Institute of Standards and Technology, is conducting this survey. Our goals are to identify: 1. technology currently used for communication in public safety today; 2. problems experienced with this technology; 3. other kinds of technology that may be helpful for communication in public safety in the future. The survey will take about 20 minutes to complete. Please share the survey link with others you know in public safety, the more folks we hear from the better. www.XXXX.nist.gov We appreciate your time and input! Your Participation is Confidential and Voluntary All data are de-identified. No personally identifiable information (PII) is collected or associated in any way with your survey responses. Your participation is voluntary and you may choose to quit the survey at any time. This collection of information contains Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) requirements approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). Notwithstanding any other provisions of the law, no person is required to respond to, nor shall any person be subject to a penalty for failure to comply with, a collection of information subject to the requirements of the PRA unless that collection of information displays a currently valid OMB control number. Public reporting burden for this collection is estimated to be 20 minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed and completing and reviewing the collection of information.
    [Show full text]
  • Intro To: Scanning Long Island
    Intro to: Scanning Long Island Download these slides at: http://www.w2lie.net/hru Phil Lichtenberger w2lie http://www.w2lie.net/hru Topics • Conventional Scanning • Trunked Scanning • PL / DPL / NAC • Digital Modes (P25 / Mototrbo) • Rebanding • Useful Equipment for Long Island Scanning http://www.w2lie.net/hru Advanced Forum Topics How to get more from your scanner with a PC • Software based trunk decoding Unitrunker / Pro96Com / Trunk88 • Conventional Logging Freescan / ProScan / BuTel Software • Digital Modulation Decoding – DSD Decoder / DSM Decoder – Monitoring MotoTRBO / NXDN / DMR / P25 http://www.w2lie.net/hru Conventional Scanning http://www.w2lie.net/hru Conventional Scanning • Simplex – Single Frequency • Ex. Fireground Operations Tx / Rx = A Tx / Rx = A http://www.w2lie.net/hru Conventional Scanning • Repeater – Separate Input & Output Frequency • Ex. Dispatch System Tx = A Tx = A Rx = B Rx = B http://www.w2lie.net/hru Conventional Scanning • Duplex – Two Frequencies, used in RX/TX & TX/RX • Ex. New York State Police Tx = A Rx = A Rx = B Tx = B http://www.w2lie.net/hru Conventional Scanning Tone Control • PL / CTCSS (Motorola Private Line) – Sub Audible signals transmitted with analog signals carrying voice transmission – Receivers only open squelch for radios transmitting the correct PL tone – Allows agencies to share the same frequency, but not hear each other (unless they also share the same PL) http://www.w2lie.net/hru Conventional Scanning Tone Control • DPL / DCS (Digital Private Line) – Digital coded Squelch signals transmitted with analog signals carrying voice transmission – Receivers only open squelch for radios transmitting the correct DPL tone – Allows agencies to share the same frequency, but not hear each other (unless they also share the same DPL) http://www.w2lie.net/hru PL Tones • The following chart showing each PL tone's two-character alphanumeric designator and the corresponding tone frequency in Hertz.
    [Show full text]
  • But I Just Want to Listen to the Police. Why Does This Have to Be So
    But I just want to listen to the Police. Why does this have to be so complicated? <sigh> Well, unfortunately the days of “enter this frequency to hear the police” are nearly over. Several major trends have converged that have resulted in police (and other agencies) moving to more efficient, “trunked” radio systems: • Higher levels of radio usage has meant that there aren’t enough individual frequencies available to allow every group to have their own frequency. • Technology advances have brought down the overall cost and complexity of implementing a trunked radio system while increasing the features available to the agency and individual radio users. • Roll-out of major statewide trunked systems makes it easier for even small agencies to “piggy back” onto the larger system for less cost than replacing existing systems. Of course, to the average radio user, the complexity of a trunked system is invisible. Their radio is programmed up at the radio shop. They can still easily select who they need to communicate with by selecting a channel on their two-way. They can even directly call other radio users without tying up a dispatch channel…something they could never do, before. The scanner user, on the other hand, needs to be a lot more savvy about the different types of Trunking systems in use, the different options available on each system, and a host of other arcania in order to successfully monitor their favorite agency. In this article, I’m not going to the level of arcania. Instead, this article will introduce the features that most Trunking systems have in common.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Mobile Radio Test Systems Aeroflex Radio Test Sets
    AM/FM/SSB Motorola SmartZone™ and SMARTNET™ A passion for performance. P25 P25 Trunking P25 Phase II - TDMA LSM DMR/MOTOTRBO™ NXDN™ dPMR TETRA TEDS ARIB T98 EDACS LTR® MPT 1327 Land Mobile Radio Test Systems Aeroflex Radio Test Sets Today’s family of Aeroflex Radio Test Sets is the result of more than 50 years of experience in providing superior radio test solutions. Through strategic acquisitions, Aeroflex radio test sets bring a strong history of performance from the icons of radio test including; Marconi Instruments, IFR Systems and Willtek. Now, enhanced with research and development into new technologies and new platforms, Aeroflex delivers the widest range of Radio Test Sets for today’s digital Land Mobile Radio communication systems. These proven systems have achieved worldwide acceptance, making Aeroflex the undisputed leader in Land Mobile Radio test technology. Aeroflex radio test sets are used everywhere from R&D labs, production test and field service. Extremely durable, of the highest quality and easy to use, Aeroflex radio test sets are used worldwide for public safety applications, including mission critical police and emergency communication systems. From direct power measurement of 150 W transmitters to testing receiver digital BER sensitivity, Aeroflex radio test sets are in demand because of their unique ability to deliver high accuracy and ease of use. Every Aeroflex radio test set is reliable, has an excellent price/performance ratio and represents an outstanding test value. Aeroflex understands that today’s digital communications markets move quickly. You can count on Aeroflex’s expertise to rapidly respond to not only changes in the market, but also to your specific requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • No. 412 Mobile Data Terminals & Handheld Devices
    POLICY & PROCEDURES No. 412 Subject/Title: Mobile Data Terminals & Handheld Devices Issuing Authority: Review Date: May 10, 2010 Issue Date: August 5, 2010 Effective Date: Cambridge Police Department Robert C. Haas Police Commissioner Rescinds: References/ Attachments: Accreditation Standards: 41.3.7 I. PURPOSE: The purpose of this policy is to provide police officers with guidelines for the proper use of Mobile Data Terminals (MDT’s) and handheld mobile computers. To ensure legal and proper use of this resource, all department members must have a thorough understanding of the content of this policy and the importance of it. In addition, it provides operational procedures for the proper access, use, and security of the information that can be obtained from mobile systems and handheld devices. II. POLICY: 1 It is the policy of this department that: • Employees using mobile computers and software will be trained to the appropriate level of use; • Mobile computers are to be used for legitimate police business only; • Mobile Data Computers (MDT) will be used in a manner that it does not pose a hazard while operating the cruiser; • Employees are responsible for ensuring that mobile computers are used in an effective, efficient, and lawful manner; and 1 CALEA Std.: 41.3.7 – If the agency has computerized mobile data access capabilities or other similar technologies, a written directive establishes procedures for its use, to include: a. The unauthorized introduction of software programs or other files; or b. The manipulation or alteration of current software running on agency-owned mobile, desktop or handheld computers. LAST PRINTED 2/16/2012 1:02:00 PM #412 – Mobile Data Terminals /Handheld Devices Page 2 of 8 • Random and periodic audits of MDT use and log files will be made at the department’s discretion, and compliance with guidelines wert forth by the FBI and the Criminal History Systems Board (CHSB).
    [Show full text]
  • Task 3 Tompkins County
    q NYS TEC New York State Technology Enterprise Corporation presents its Options for a Public Safety Wireless Communications System: Synthesis and Evaluation Report for the Tompkins County Radio System Project February 28, 2001 Version 2 Options for a Public Safety Wireless Radio Communication System: NYS TEC Synthesis and Evaluation Report Tompkins County Radio System Project Table of Contents 1. OVERVIEW ..................................................................................................................................................1 2. WIDE-AREA WIRELESS MOBILE TECHNOLOGY ............................................................................3 2.1 RADIO FREQUENCIES .......................................................................................................................................3 2.2 CONVENTIONAL RADIO SYSTEMS ..................................................................................................................10 2.3 DIGITAL VOICE, DATA AND ENCRYPTION......................................................................................................13 2.4 VOTING SYSTEMS ..........................................................................................................................................17 2.5 TRUNKED RADIO SYSTEMS ............................................................................................................................17 2.6 SIMULCAST ....................................................................................................................................................24
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Land Mobile Systems for Dispatch Traffic
    Report ITU-R M.2014-3 (11/2016) Digital land mobile systems for dispatch traffic M Series Mobile, radiodetermination, amateur and related satellite services ii Rep. ITU-R M.2014-3 Foreword The role of the Radiocommunication Sector is to ensure the rational, equitable, efficient and economical use of the radio- frequency spectrum by all radiocommunication services, including satellite services, and carry out studies without limit of frequency range on the basis of which Recommendations are adopted. The regulatory and policy functions of the Radiocommunication Sector are performed by World and Regional Radiocommunication Conferences and Radiocommunication Assemblies supported by Study Groups. Policy on Intellectual Property Right (IPR) ITU-R policy on IPR is described in the Common Patent Policy for ITU-T/ITU-R/ISO/IEC referenced in Annex 1 of Resolution ITU-R 1. Forms to be used for the submission of patent statements and licensing declarations by patent holders are available from http://www.itu.int/ITU-R/go/patents/en where the Guidelines for Implementation of the Common Patent Policy for ITU-T/ITU-R/ISO/IEC and the ITU-R patent information database can also be found. Series of ITU-R Reports (Also available online at http://www.itu.int/publ/R-REP/en) Series Title BO Satellite delivery BR Recording for production, archival and play-out; film for television BS Broadcasting service (sound) BT Broadcasting service (television) F Fixed service M Mobile, radiodetermination, amateur and related satellite services P Radiowave propagation RA Radio astronomy RS Remote sensing systems S Fixed-satellite service SA Space applications and meteorology SF Frequency sharing and coordination between fixed-satellite and fixed service systems SM Spectrum management Note: This ITU-R Report was approved in English by the Study Group under the procedure detailed in Resolution ITU-R 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The FAA/Nextgen Perspective
    The FAA/NextGen perspective LDACS Awareness Campaign March 2021 Prepared by: Brent Phillips; Senior Systems Engineer, ANG-B2 Federal Aviation Administration 11th Air Navigation Position • Aeronautical air-to-ground VHF channel capacity for Air Traffic Management (ATM) is reaching saturation • Most severe in Europe and parts of the United States • Various proposals to address this problem have been offered and approved independently; none has achieved global endorsement • ICAO is seeking a common, global solution through the Aeronautical Communications Panel (ACP) A I R T R A F F I C O R G A N I Z A T I O N 2 FAA/EUROCONTROL Joint Future Communications Study CCOM FAA/EUROCONTROL Coordination Committee • The FAA and EUROCONTROL initiated a bi-lateral study of the problem with the support of NASA to provide major input to ICAO ACP in its search for a global solution – Objectives: • Identification of requirements and operating concepts • Investigation into new mobile communication technologies • Investigation of a flexible avionics architecture Development of a Future Communications Roadmap • Creation of industry buy-in • Improvements to maximise utilisation of current spectrum * Federal Aviation Administration/EUROCONTROL , Cooperative Research and Development Action Plan 17: Future Communications3 Study (AP 17-04) Technology Identification • In order to identify all technologies that may be applicable to aeronautical communications, a multi- pronged approach was used for technology identification: 1. A survey of widely used and successful commercial and military technologies was conducted to identify technologies that offered potential value to A/G communications 2. NASA released two Requests for Information soliciting technology candidate inputs from industry 3.
    [Show full text]