DOCSLIB.ORG

FINAL System Alternatives Recommendations Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FINAL System Alternatives Recommendations Report CTA Communications CONSULTANTS FINAL System Alternatives and Recommendations Report Pima County Wireless Integrated Network (PCWIN) Arizona June 26, 2007 Pima County Wireless Integrated Network (PCWIN) FINAL System Alternatives and Recommendations Report June 26, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 6 1.1 PCWIN Project Goals and Objectives .................................................................... 6 1.2 Business Architecture Planning Overview ............................................................. 9 1.3 System Alternatives and Recommendations........................................................... 9 2.0 REGULATORY ISSUES..................................................................................... 12 2.1 Migration to Digital Technology .......................................................................... 12 2.1.1 Digital Communications Techniques.................................................................... 13 2.1.2 Advantages of Digital Technology ....................................................................... 13 2.1.2.1 Increased Capacity............................................................................................... 13 2.1.2.2 Signal Recovery................................................................................................... 14 2.1.2.3 Encryption............................................................................................................ 14 2.1.2.4 Mobile Data ......................................................................................................... 14 2.1.3 Disadvantages of Digital Technology................................................................... 15 2.1.3.1 Cost...................................................................................................................... 15 2.1.3.2 Interoperability..................................................................................................... 15 2.1.4 Project 25.............................................................................................................. 16 2.1.5 TSB-88.................................................................................................................. 17 2.2 Narrowbanding of LMR Spectrum below 512 MHz ............................................ 19 2.2.1 New Narrowband Channels .................................................................................. 19 2.2.2 Narrowband Equipment Requirements................................................................. 19 2.2.3 Deadline for Wideband Equipment Manufacture................................................. 20 2.2.4 Deadline for Migration ......................................................................................... 20 2.2.5 Deadline for Wideband Applications.................................................................... 20 2.2.6 Trunking in the VHF and UHF Bands.................................................................. 20 2.2.7 Impact of Narrowbanding on Agencies’ Communications .................................. 21 2.3 The 700-MHz Public Safety Band........................................................................ 21 2.3.1 Congressional Action............................................................................................ 21 2.3.2 Objectives ............................................................................................................. 22 2.3.3 State Licenses........................................................................................................23 2.3.4 Regional Planning Committees............................................................................. 23 2.3.5 Availability ........................................................................................................... 24 2.4 The 800-MHz Rebanding Plan ............................................................................. 24 2.4.1 The Current Situation............................................................................................ 24 2.4.1.1 Existing Frequency Allocations at 800-MHz ...................................................... 24 2.4.1.2 Interference mechanisms ..................................................................................... 26 2.4.2 The FCC Rebanding Plan ..................................................................................... 27 Table of Contents Page 1 of 146 Pima County Wireless Integrated Network (PCWIN) FINAL System Alternatives and Recommendations Report June 26, 2007 2.4.3 Rebanding Management ....................................................................................... 29 2.4.4 Timetable .............................................................................................................. 29 2.4.5 Regional Timetable............................................................................................... 30 2.4.6 Application Freeze................................................................................................ 30 2.4.7 Conclusion ............................................................................................................ 31 2.5 Fixed Microwave Services Relocation ................................................................. 32 2.5.1 The Lower 2-GHz Band........................................................................................ 32 2.5.2 The Upper 2-GHz Band........................................................................................ 32 2.5.2.1 Relocations by AWS Licensees........................................................................... 33 2.5.2.2 Relocations by MSS Licensees............................................................................ 33 2.5.3 Conclusion ............................................................................................................ 33 2.6 The 4.9 GHz Band ................................................................................................ 34 2.6.1 Band Plan.............................................................................................................. 34 2.6.2 Licensing and Coordination.................................................................................. 34 3.0 VOICE RADIO TECHNOLOGIES ..................................................................... 35 3.1 Voice Radio System Alternatives ......................................................................... 35 3.1.1 Trunked Radio – Project 25 Technology.............................................................. 35 3.1.2 Trunked Radio – Proprietary Technology ............................................................ 40 3.1.3 Conventional Radio – Project 25 Technology...................................................... 46 3.1.4 Conventional Radio – Analog Technology........................................................... 48 3.1.5 Commercial Wireless............................................................................................ 50 3.1.6 TETRA Professional Mobile Radio...................................................................... 52 3.2 Frequency Band Considerations........................................................................... 52 3.2.1 Frequency Band.................................................................................................... 52 3.2.1.1 700 MHz Band..................................................................................................... 53 3.2.1.2 800 MHz Band..................................................................................................... 54 3.2.1.3 VHF and UHF Bands........................................................................................... 54 3.2.1.4 Frequency Coordination with Mexico ................................................................. 55 3.3 Impact Analysis.................................................................................................... 56 3.4 Impact Results - Voice Radio Systems................................................................. 58 TABLE 3-1 TRUNKED P25 SERVICES ............................................................ 61 TABLE 3-2 CONVENTIONAL P25 SERVICES................................................ 63 TABLE 3-3 IMPACT ANALYSIS RESULTS – VOICE SYSTEM TECHNOLOGIES – COMBINED LAW AND FIRE...................... 64 TABLE 3-4 IMPACT ANALYSIS RESULTS – VOICE SYSTEM TECHNOLOGIES – LAW ENFORCEMENT................................. 65 TABLE 3-5 IMPACT ANALYSIS RESULTS – VOICE SYSTEM TECHNOLOGIES – FIRE DEPARTMENTS.................................. 66 Table of Contents Page 2 of 146 Pima County Wireless Integrated Network (PCWIN) FINAL System Alternatives and Recommendations Report June 26, 2007 FIGURE 3-1 IMPACT BLOCK DIAGRAM.................................................... 67 4.0 MOBILE DATA SYSTEM TECHNOLOGIES................................................... 68 4.1 Mobile Data System Alternatives ......................................................................... 68 4.1.1 Stand-Alone Mobile Data Systems....................................................................... 69 4.1.2 Integrated Mobile Data and Voice Systems.......................................................... 71 4.1.3 Commercial Wireless............................................................................................ 73 4.2 Impact Analysis.................................................................................................... 75 4.3
Load more

Recommended publications
  • DMR and Digital Voice Modes
    DMR and Digital Voice Modes Presented by N7MOT – Lenny Gemar Amateur radio began with spark gap transmitters, evolving to Morse code and analog voice communications, all originally in the Low Frequency (LF) and High Frequency (HF) bands. Since those early days, many new modes, both analog and digital have been developed. These modes now span from the Very Low Frequencies (VLF) to the Extra High Frequencies (EHF). This presentation is designed to acquaint amateur radio operators with the Digital Mobile Radio or DMR format of digital audio communications, used primarily in the VHF and UHF bands. We’ll briefly discuss the other four Common Air Interface formats (CAI) before diving into the specifics of DMR. DMR and Digital Voice Modes – 8/14/2017 Page 1 of 20 DMR and Digital Voice Modes Digital Voice Modes used in Amateur Radio Interconnected Systems • DDD-D---StarStar ––– Digital Smart Technologies for Amateur Radio (FDMA) • WiresWires----X/SystemX/System Fusion --- Wide-coverage Internet Repeater Enhancement System (FDMA) • NXDN (IDAS/NEXEDGE) ––– Icom/Kenwood Collaboration (FDMA) • DMR ––– Digital Mobile Radio (TDMA 2-TS) • P25 (Phase 1) – Project 25 or APCO P25 (Phase 1 FDMA, Phase 2 TDMA 2-TS) • TETRA --- Terrestrial Trunked Radio, formerly known as Trans-European Trunked Radio (TDMA 4-TS) No known U.S./Canada amateur deployments. DMR and Digital Voice Modes – 8/14/2017 Page 2 of 20 DMR and Digital Voice Modes Digital Voice Modes used in Amateur Radio Interconnected Systems. Repeaters in service as reported by RepeaterBook.com on 8/14/2017 @ 12:00 PDT for the U.S. and Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Project 25 and Interoperability in Land Mobile Radio
    WHITE PAPER 2014 PROJECT 25 AND INTEROPERABILITY IN LAND MOBILE RADIO • The Project 25 standard is unique in that it is a USER driven standard. • Multiple vendors support the P25 standard. • Motorola Solutions equipment interoperates with other vendors equipment. • Customers can and do have a mix of vendor’s equipment. • As technology and customer needs move forward, so too, does P25, which is an open and continually evolving standard. WHITE PAPER PROJECT 25 AND INTEROPERABILITY IN LAND MOBILE RADIO P25: A UNIQUE USER DRIVEN STANDARD Public safety agencies are challenged with keeping communities safe and protecting the lives of their officers, both in normal day-to-day operations as well as when a disaster strikes. Often, it requires agencies to work not only within their jurisdictions or agencies but also across multiple jurisdictions and agencies. Interoperable wireless communications is critical to coordinating joint and immediate response. The public safety community and mission critical land mobile communication providers have been working hand-in-hand for many years and have developed the Project 25 (P25) standards for interoperable mission critical communications. WHAT IS THE PROJECT 25 STANDARD AND WHO MANAGES IT? According to the Project 25 Interest Group (PTIG), “Project 25 is the standard for the design and manufacture of interoperable digital two-way wireless communications products. Developed in North America with state, local and federal representatives and Telecommunications Industry Association (TIA) governance, P25 has gained worldwide acceptance for public safety, security, public service, and commercial applications.” PTIG continues, “The published P25 standards suite is administered by the Telecommunications Industry Association (TIA Mobile and Personal Private Radio Standards Committee TR-8).
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Specification for Land Mobile Radio Equipment
    SKMM WTS LMR Rev. 1.01:2007 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION FOR LAND MOBILE RADIO EQUIPMENT Suruhanjaya Komunikasi dan Multimedia Malaysia Off Pesiaran Multimedia, 63000 Cyberjaya, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia Copyright of SKMM, 2007 SKMM WTS LMR Rev. 1.01:2007 FOREWORD This Technical Specification was developed under the authority of the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (SKMM) under the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998 (CMA 98) and the relevant provisions on technical regulation of Part VII of the CMA 98. It is based on recognised International Standards documents. This Technical Specification specifies the specification to conform for approval of telecommunications devices. NOTICE This Specification is subject to review and revision i SKMM WTS LMR Rev. 1.01:2007 CONTENTS Page Foreword................................................................................................................... i 1 Scope........................................................................................................................ 1 2 Normative references ............................................................................................... 1 3 Abbreviations............................................................................................................ 1 4 Requirements ........................................................................................................... 2 4.1 General requirements............................................................................................... 2 4.2
    [Show full text]
  • Security Weaknesses in the APCO Project 25 Two-Way Radio System
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Technical Reports (CIS) Department of Computer & Information Science 11-18-2010 Security Weaknesses in the APCO Project 25 Two-Way Radio System Sandy Clark University of Pennsylvania Perry Metzger University of Pennsylvania Zachary Wasserman University of Pennsylvania Kevin Xu University of Pennsylvania Matthew A. Blaze University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/cis_reports Part of the Computer Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Sandy Clark, Perry Metzger, Zachary Wasserman, Kevin Xu, and Matthew A. Blaze, "Security Weaknesses in the APCO Project 25 Two-Way Radio System", . November 2010. University of Pennsylvania Department of Computer and Information Science Technical Report No. MS-CIS-10-34. This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/cis_reports/944 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Security Weaknesses in the APCO Project 25 Two-Way Radio System Abstract APCO Project 25 (“P25”) is a suite of wireless communications protocols designed for public safety two- way (voice) radio systems. The protocols include security options in which voice and data traffic can be cryptographically protected from eavesdropping. This report analyzes the security of P25 systems against passive and active attacks. We find a number of protocol, implementation, and user interface weaknesses that can leak information to a passive eavesdropper and that facilitate active attacks. In particular, P25 systems are highly susceptible to active traffic analysis attacks, in which radio user locations are surreptitiously determined, and selective jamming attacks, in which an attacker can jam specific kinds of traffic (such as encrypted messages or key management traffic).
    [Show full text]
  • A Software Based APCO Project 25 Data Transmission Base Station for Local Police Headquarters
    University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository Master's Theses and Capstones Student Scholarship Fall 2007 A software based APCO Project 25 data transmission base station for local police headquarters Eric Rene Ramsey University of New Hampshire, Durham Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/thesis Recommended Citation Ramsey, Eric Rene, "A software based APCO Project 25 data transmission base station for local police headquarters" (2007). Master's Theses and Capstones. 308. https://scholars.unh.edu/thesis/308 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses and Capstones by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A SOFTWARE BASED APCO PROJECT 25 DATA TRANSMISSION BASE STATION FOR LOCAL POLICE HEADQUARTERS BY ERIC RENE RAMSEY B.S., University of New Hampshire, 2005 THESIS Submitted to the University of New Hampshire in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Electrical Engineering September, 2007 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. UMI Number: 1447900 INFORMATION TO USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleed-through, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted.
    [Show full text]
  • EFJ Catalog 2004
    Sandown Wireless USA 2004 Catalog Mobiles VHF UHF 800 MHz ANALOG/DIGITAL MOBILE RADIO I APCO Project 25 Compatible – Trunked and Conventional5300 SERIES I SMARTNET® and SmartZone® I Analog FM I Encryption For over 80 years, EFJohnson has been at the forefront of the communi- cations industry. Our subscriber radios are used throughout the world by military, police, fire, paramedics, and homeland security profes- sionals. The 5300 Series Analog/ Digital Mobile Radio provides Project 25 Forward Compatibility is provided Field Programmable Capability compatibility along with SMARTNET®/ via a scalable design that allows new provides National Telecommunications SmartZone® capability to meet the features and applications to be inte- and Information Administration (NTIA) needs of federal, state, and local grated into the existing radio platform. agencies the ability to reprogram government users, as well as business, conventional frequencies, CTCSS, DCS, Encrypted Communications for industrial and public safety applications. and talkgroups into the radio’s memory. Switching between SMARTNET/ wideband legacy systems and narrow- ™ 10-Character Alphanumeric Display SmartZone Project 25 and conventional band operation. DES and DES-XL provides a backlit visual display of the analog equipment is simple – just turn enable secure voice communications in radio’s channel or talkgroup on the front the channel knob. wideband channels; Project 25 DES-OFB and AES encryption provide secure of the radio. Tilt viewing angle allows Multiple Protocol Compatibility: communication in narrowband channels. for easy viewing anywhere in the – Project 25 CAI (Common Air vehicle and in any light condition. Interface) enables users to commu- Multiple System Select is an 100-Watt Option allows extra power nicate with other Project 25 compatible advanced feature that enables the user for VHF communication systems.
    [Show full text]
  • UBCD3600XLT Owner’S Manual
    UBCD3600XLT Owner’s Manual Printed in Vietnam U01UB376BZZ(0) IMPORTANT NOTE ABOUT THIS MANUAL Radio Reference database for use in North America ONLY. NOTE The AMBE+2™ voice coding Technology embodied in this product is protected by intellectual property rights including patent rights, copyrights and trade secrets of Digital Voice Systems, Inc. microSD is a registered trademark of SanDisk Corporation. HomePatrol is a registered trademark of Uniden America Corporation, Irving, Texas. CONTENTS IMPORTANT INFORMATION . .. 1 MODIFICATION NOTICE . 1 GENERAL PRECAUTIONS . 1 Earphone Warning . 1 Liquid Exposure Warning . 1 Power Disconnection Caution . 1 INTRODUCTION . 2 CREATE FAVORITES LISTS . 2 AVOID TRANSMISSIONS . 2 REPLAY TRANSMISSIONS . 2 RECORD TRANSMISSIONS . 2 MAIN FEATURES . 2 INCLUDED WITH YOUR SCANNER . 5 USING INTERNAL BATTERIES . 6 Using Rechargeable Batteries . 6 UNDERSTANDING THE MEMORY . 6 FAVORITES LISTS . 6 SYSTEMS . 7 TRUNKING SITES . 7 DEPARTMENTS . 7 SENTINEL SOFTWARE . 7 MANAGE PROFILES . 7 MANAGE FAVORITES LISTS . 7 HOW TO INSTALL SENTINEL SOFTWARE . 7 UPDATING FIRMWARE . 7 SETTING UP YOUR SCANNER . 9 TURN ON THE SCANNER . 9 KEYPAD CONTROLS . 10 SET YOUR LOCATION AND RANGE . 13 SET LOCATION . 13 SET RANGE . 13 UNDERSTANDING RANGE . 13 EDIT LOCATION . 13 SELECTING SERVICE TYPES . 14 NAVIGATING THE MENUS . 15 DATA NAMING . 15 DISPLAY MENU . 15 A Look at the Display . 16 SETTINGS MENU . 20 Adjust Key Beep . 20 Battery Option . 20 Band Defaults . 20 Auto Shutoff . 20 Set Clock . 20 Replay Options . 21 Restore Options . 21 See Scanner Information . 21 Keypad Lock . 21 KEY CONCEPTS . .22 QUICK KEYS . 22 FAVORITES LIST QUICK KEYS . 22 SYSTEM QUICK KEYS. 22 DEPARTMENT QUICK KEYS . 22 SEARCH KEYS .
    [Show full text]
  • ZEBRA TECHNOLOGIES CORP Form 8-K Current Report Filed 2014-04-16
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION FORM 8-K Current report filing Filing Date: 2014-04-16 | Period of Report: 2014-04-14 SEC Accession No. 0001193125-14-144985 (HTML Version on secdatabase.com) FILER ZEBRA TECHNOLOGIES CORP Mailing Address Business Address 475 HALF DAY ROAD 475 HALF DAY ROAD CIK:877212| IRS No.: 362675536 | Fiscal Year End: 1231 SUITE 500 SUITE 500 Type: 8-K | Act: 34 | File No.: 000-19406 | Film No.: 14766551 LINCOLNSHIRE IL 60069 LINCOLNSHIRE IL 60069 SIC: 3560 General industrial machinery & equipment 847-634-6700 Copyright © 2013 www.secdatabase.com. All Rights Reserved. Please Consider the Environment Before Printing This Document UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, DC 20549 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Date of report (Date of earliest event reported): April 14, 2014 ZEBRA TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter) Delaware 000-19406 36-2675536 (State or Other Jurisdiction (Commission (IRS Employer of Incorporation) File Number) Identification No.) 475 Half Day Road, Suite 500, Lincolnshire, Illinois 60069 (Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code) Registrants telephone number, including area code: 847-634-6700 (Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report) Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions: ¨ Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) ¨ Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) ¨ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) ¨ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13c-4(c)) Copyright © 2013 www.secdatabase.com.
    [Show full text]
  • Communications Technology Assessment for the Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) Control and Non-Payload Communications (CNPC) Link
    NASA/CR—2014-216675 Communications Technology Assessment for the Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) Control and Non-Payload Communications (CNPC) Link Steven C. Bretmersky MTI Systems, Inc., Cleveland, Ohio William D. Bishop Verizon Federal Network Systems, LLC., Arlington, Virginia Justin E. Dailey MTI Systems, Inc., Cleveland, Ohio Christine T. Chevalier Vantage Partners, LLC, Brook Park, Ohio June 2014 NASA STI Program . in Profi le Since its founding, NASA has been dedicated to the • CONFERENCE PUBLICATION. Collected advancement of aeronautics and space science. The papers from scientifi c and technical NASA Scientifi c and Technical Information (STI) conferences, symposia, seminars, or other program plays a key part in helping NASA maintain meetings sponsored or cosponsored by NASA. this important role. • SPECIAL PUBLICATION. Scientifi c, The NASA STI Program operates under the auspices technical, or historical information from of the Agency Chief Information Offi cer. It collects, NASA programs, projects, and missions, often organizes, provides for archiving, and disseminates concerned with subjects having substantial NASA’s STI. The NASA STI program provides access public interest. to the NASA Aeronautics and Space Database and its public interface, the NASA Technical Reports • TECHNICAL TRANSLATION. English- Server, thus providing one of the largest collections language translations of foreign scientifi c and of aeronautical and space science STI in the world. technical material pertinent to NASA’s mission. Results are published in both non-NASA channels and by NASA in the NASA STI Report Series, which Specialized services also include creating custom includes the following report types: thesauri, building customized databases, organizing and publishing research results. • TECHNICAL PUBLICATION.
    [Show full text]
  • Intro To: Scanning Long Island
    Intro to: Scanning Long Island Download these slides at: http://www.w2lie.net/hru Phil Lichtenberger w2lie http://www.w2lie.net/hru Topics • Conventional Scanning • Trunked Scanning • PL / DPL / NAC • Digital Modes (P25 / Mototrbo) • Rebanding • Useful Equipment for Long Island Scanning http://www.w2lie.net/hru Advanced Forum Topics How to get more from your scanner with a PC • Software based trunk decoding Unitrunker / Pro96Com / Trunk88 • Conventional Logging Freescan / ProScan / BuTel Software • Digital Modulation Decoding – DSD Decoder / DSM Decoder – Monitoring MotoTRBO / NXDN / DMR / P25 http://www.w2lie.net/hru Conventional Scanning http://www.w2lie.net/hru Conventional Scanning • Simplex – Single Frequency • Ex. Fireground Operations Tx / Rx = A Tx / Rx = A http://www.w2lie.net/hru Conventional Scanning • Repeater – Separate Input & Output Frequency • Ex. Dispatch System Tx = A Tx = A Rx = B Rx = B http://www.w2lie.net/hru Conventional Scanning • Duplex – Two Frequencies, used in RX/TX & TX/RX • Ex. New York State Police Tx = A Rx = A Rx = B Tx = B http://www.w2lie.net/hru Conventional Scanning Tone Control • PL / CTCSS (Motorola Private Line) – Sub Audible signals transmitted with analog signals carrying voice transmission – Receivers only open squelch for radios transmitting the correct PL tone – Allows agencies to share the same frequency, but not hear each other (unless they also share the same PL) http://www.w2lie.net/hru Conventional Scanning Tone Control • DPL / DCS (Digital Private Line) – Digital coded Squelch signals transmitted with analog signals carrying voice transmission – Receivers only open squelch for radios transmitting the correct DPL tone – Allows agencies to share the same frequency, but not hear each other (unless they also share the same DPL) http://www.w2lie.net/hru PL Tones • The following chart showing each PL tone's two-character alphanumeric designator and the corresponding tone frequency in Hertz.
    [Show full text]
  • But I Just Want to Listen to the Police. Why Does This Have to Be So
    But I just want to listen to the Police. Why does this have to be so complicated? <sigh> Well, unfortunately the days of “enter this frequency to hear the police” are nearly over. Several major trends have converged that have resulted in police (and other agencies) moving to more efficient, “trunked” radio systems: • Higher levels of radio usage has meant that there aren’t enough individual frequencies available to allow every group to have their own frequency. • Technology advances have brought down the overall cost and complexity of implementing a trunked radio system while increasing the features available to the agency and individual radio users. • Roll-out of major statewide trunked systems makes it easier for even small agencies to “piggy back” onto the larger system for less cost than replacing existing systems. Of course, to the average radio user, the complexity of a trunked system is invisible. Their radio is programmed up at the radio shop. They can still easily select who they need to communicate with by selecting a channel on their two-way. They can even directly call other radio users without tying up a dispatch channel…something they could never do, before. The scanner user, on the other hand, needs to be a lot more savvy about the different types of Trunking systems in use, the different options available on each system, and a host of other arcania in order to successfully monitor their favorite agency. In this article, I’m not going to the level of arcania. Instead, this article will introduce the features that most Trunking systems have in common.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Mobile Radio Test Systems Aeroflex Radio Test Sets
    AM/FM/SSB Motorola SmartZone™ and SMARTNET™ A passion for performance. P25 P25 Trunking P25 Phase II - TDMA LSM DMR/MOTOTRBO™ NXDN™ dPMR TETRA TEDS ARIB T98 EDACS LTR® MPT 1327 Land Mobile Radio Test Systems Aeroflex Radio Test Sets Today’s family of Aeroflex Radio Test Sets is the result of more than 50 years of experience in providing superior radio test solutions. Through strategic acquisitions, Aeroflex radio test sets bring a strong history of performance from the icons of radio test including; Marconi Instruments, IFR Systems and Willtek. Now, enhanced with research and development into new technologies and new platforms, Aeroflex delivers the widest range of Radio Test Sets for today’s digital Land Mobile Radio communication systems. These proven systems have achieved worldwide acceptance, making Aeroflex the undisputed leader in Land Mobile Radio test technology. Aeroflex radio test sets are used everywhere from R&D labs, production test and field service. Extremely durable, of the highest quality and easy to use, Aeroflex radio test sets are used worldwide for public safety applications, including mission critical police and emergency communication systems. From direct power measurement of 150 W transmitters to testing receiver digital BER sensitivity, Aeroflex radio test sets are in demand because of their unique ability to deliver high accuracy and ease of use. Every Aeroflex radio test set is reliable, has an excellent price/performance ratio and represents an outstanding test value. Aeroflex understands that today’s digital communications markets move quickly. You can count on Aeroflex’s expertise to rapidly respond to not only changes in the market, but also to your specific requirements.
    [Show full text]