STATE of SCHOOL FACILITIES REPORT Fulton County School System December 2015 This Page Is Intentionally Left Blank

STATE OF SCHOOL FACILITIES REPORT Fulton County School System December 2015 This page is intentionally left blank.

DRAFT

Page ii DRAFT - INFORMATION NOT FINALIZED Fulton County School System Fulton County School System STATE OF SCHOOL FACILITIES REPORT Executive Summary | December 2015

Fulton County School (FCS) System recently completed a comprehensive facilities condition assessment. This assessment was completed in order to develop a facility master plan that will direct long-range capital planning for improvement efforts and investment across the district. In full implementation, this plan will help the district achieve its scholastic vision to produce skilled and productive students.

The assessment consisted of several data gathering components that culminate to provide options for future investment. These components included an assessment of the entire FCS facility portfolio, including an educational adequacy assessment, a facility condition assessment, a 5 and 10-year life cycle forecast, and a review of FCS enrollment projections. Results from the assessment are summarized in this document, giving an overall picture of the current state of FCS facilities. With this information, options for facility improvement will eventually form a facility master plan and forecast future funding requirements.

Data collected during the various assessments and analysis are currently housed in the MAPPS™ assessment database in order to support FCS’s capital planning efforts, as well as manage future maintenance and renewal operations. This information can be referenced to support future district planning.

The facility condition and educational adequacy assessments identified $351.3 FULTON COUNTY SCHOOLS ASSESSMENT FINDINGS million in facility deficiency costs. FACILITY DEFICIENCY + The projected life cycle renewal needs COST $ 351.3 for FCS’s facilities over the next five Million years is estimated to be $123.3 million. 5-YEAR LIFE CYCLE + Combining current needs with the next FORECAST $ 123.3 five years of anticipated life cycle renewal Million forecast, FCS can anticipate $474.6 TOTAL 5-YEAR NEED $ 474.6 million in near-term construction Million program. The projected life cycle renewal needs for FCS’s facilities in years YEAR 6-10 LIFE CYCLE + $ 469.5 FORECAST 6 through 10 is estimated to be $469.5 Million million. Combining current needs with the next ten years of anticipated life cycle TOTAL 10-YEAR NEED $ 944.1 Million renewalDRAFT forecast, FCS can anticipate $944.1 million in facility-related needs over the long term for planning purposes.

The Facility Condition Index (FCI) is a recognized formula that provides a general indicator of a building’s health, calculated by dividing the total cost of repair into the total replacement cost. The majority of FCS’s campus and building 5-year FCIs are less than 20 percent, indicating that the majority of the district’s buildings are in average to good condition.

State of School Facilities Report DRAFT - INFORMATION NOT FINALIZED Page iii Acknowledgments

We would like to extend our appreciation to Fulton County School (FCS) System for choosing our team to conduct this comprehensive assessment. We must thank the school principals, building engineers, teachers, facility planning department, and the entire FCS staff who provided input, feedback, and guidance throughout this process.

FCS SUPERINTENDENT FCS ADMINISTRATION AND FACILITIES STAFF Kenneth Zeff – Interim Superintendent Mike Wilbourne – Director of Capital BOARD OF TRUSTEES Improvements Department Katie Reeves – District 2 Patrick Burke – Deputy Superintendent for Gail Dean – District 3 Operations Linda Bryant – District 4 Tiffany Martin – Operations Linda McCain – District 5 Paul Walker – Architecture/CIP Coordinator Catherine Maddox – District 6 Susan Simpson – Capital Improvements Julia Bernath – District 7 Department

PROJECT TEAM

Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc DeJong-Richter IntegralGude, Program Management, LLC

DRAFT

Page iv DRAFT - INFORMATION NOT FINALIZED Fulton County School System Table of Contents

INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY 1

FACILITY PORTFOLIO 5

EDUCATIONAL ADEQUACY 6

FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT AND LIFE CYCLE RENEWAL 8

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS & COMBINED 5-YEAR AND 10-YEAR NEED 14

APPENDIX A - CAMPUS CONDITION SUMMARY 15

APPENDIX B - BUILDING CONDITION SUMMARY 17

DRAFT

State of School Facilities Report DRAFT - INFORMATION NOT FINALIZED Page v This page is intentionally left blank. DRAFT

Page vi DRAFT - INFORMATION NOT FINALIZED Fulton County School System Introduction and Methodology

In order to support Fulton County School (FCS) System’s scholastic vision, each campus facility must be well-equipped with appropriate learning spaces for students and faculty alike. A facility master plan should be developed to direct investment to achieve the district’s vision, including associated goals and objectives. FCS has embarked on a comprehensive assessment of every campus facility within its jurisdiction in order to develop this facility master plan for improvement efforts and investment.

This document summarizes the results of the 2015 comprehensive assessment for FCS that provides options for future investment dollars. The comprehensive assessment includes a review of FCS’s facility portfolio, an educational adequacy assessment, a facility condition assessment, a 5-year and 10-year life cycle forecast, and a review of FCS enrollment projections. Data are combined to formulate total district-wide investment needs for the next ten years, which in turn can be used to develop a facility master plan and forecast future funding requirements.

The facility condition assessment contains detailed information associated with each building component, including the overall condition of school facilities, as well as life cycle forecasting information that identifies future building and system needs. Other information collected during the educational adequacy assessments included an inventory of facility features that support the mission of the schools. Lastly, a review of the FCS’s previously-developed enrollment projections was performed. All collected data is housed in the MAPPSTM assessment database for future access and analysis by the district. This database and application will be provided to the district at the conclusion of the assessment.

THE FCS COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT PROCESS This report summarizes findings and results for each component of the FCS comprehensive assessment. As shown in Figure 1 below, each individual assessment or data gathering exercise leads to the production of a list of needs over the next ten years. This is used to finalize options informing a facility master plan. Beyond the assessment, the process includes several community engagement meetings aimed at capturing information and reaction from important public sources.

Facility Portfolio Capacity & Utilization y Maste ilit r P c la a n F Educational Adequacy DRAFT 5 & 10-Year Options Need Planning

Facility Condition

Community Life Cycle District Engagement Forecast Review Facility DeficienciesDeficiency Cost

Figure 1: FCS Comprehensive Assessment Process

State of School Facilities Report DRAFT - INFORMATION NOT FINALIZED Page 1 COMPONENTS OF THE FCS COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT Each comprehensive assessment component is described in further detail below. Facility Portfolio In order to produce accurate data regarding a district’s portfolio, a space inventory must be prepared. The Jacobs team achieved this by gathering FCS’s site and floor plans for all buildings within its portfolio. During the initial stages of the assessment, data were collected, analyzed, and correlated for use throughout the remainder of the assessment to quantify deficiencies. Final results will be used for future facility management. Educational Adequacy Assessment The educational adequacy assessment process includes the evaluation of all schools to ensure that district educational specifications are met, and that all spaces adequately support education. These standards are based on district specifications; Jacobs best practices and standards from previous experience, and align with the District’s 2012-2017 Strategic Plan and Priorities. Of the eight educational adequacy categories, instructional support, technology support and security result in the highest costs. The remaining five categories are support for programs, infrastructure, physical characteristics, learning environment, and relationship of spaces. Deficiencies from this assessment that are correctable through reasonable construction or maintenance practices are included with cost estimates in the facility condition assessment data. Facility Condition Assessment The facility condition assessment evaluates each building’s overall condition, including its site, roof, structural integrity, the exterior building envelope, the interior, and the mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems. Two components of the facility condition assessment are combined to total the cost for facility need.

Architectural, mechanical, and electrical engineering professionals observed conditions at the facilities in FCS. Conditions were evaluated from a visual observation that did not include intrusive measures, destructive investigations, or testing. Additionally, input provided by District Facilities and Maintenance staff was incorporated where applicable.

The two components of the facility condition assessment are: Facility Deficiency Cost

Facility deficiency costs are associated with bringing current systems and components back to a functional state as installed, but do not account for additional funds required to adapt facilities to new construction standards or address capacity. In addition to facility deficiency costs, educational DRAFTadequacy assessment deficiencies are included in this total number. Life Cycle Forecast

Life cycle data predicts future facility costs based on the expected remaining life of individual building systems (e.g., roofing, exterior, structural, interior, and more). While a particular building component may not require immediate replacement, it is quite possible for it to reach its end of useful life before or during the commencement of a planned capital construction project. This results in additional costs, which must be accounted for in the planning process. Combined 5-Year and 10-Year Need Combining the current condition repair costs with the 5-year life cycle renewal forecast indicates total district need for near term construction programs. Combining the current condition repair costs with the 10-year life cycle renewal forecast indicates total district need for long term master planning purposes

Page 2 DRAFT - INFORMATION NOT FINALIZED Fulton County School System These figures exclude any expansion for classroom additions or new construction for additional enrollment growth. Also not included are costs for programmatic changes, school consolidations, and replacements. These items should be determined as part of different scenarios developed during capital planning. District Review Results from the comprehensive assessment were presented to the district for review by FCS staff and principals. Where necessary, FCS staff provided valuable input identifying additional needs not addressed in the assessment findings. A three-day work session was then completed with FCS staff to refine the assessment data and overall needs identified. Options Planning Based on information collected during the assessment, the district can begin to plan a facilities modernization program to address deteriorating buildings that are under or over utilized. Many different scenarios are possible that take into account facility condition, capacity, attendance zone utilization, and other factors to determine the future serviceability of facilities across the district. Each scenario will have a different impact on the actual cost related to facility condition improvements, educational adequacy improvements, 10-year life cycle costs, and costs of replacing some facilities in poor condition with new buildings. It is important to note that developing actual potential scenarios must involve reviewing these factors, as well as additional planning involving key stakeholders. Facility Master Plan Once the results from the options planning process are vetted with the community, recommendations for a facility master plan will be compiled. This final report will outline an action for each of FCS’s facilities. Recommendations will be presented by priority and in phases showing which facilities should be addressed first, and then the subsequent order for remaining facilities. Approximate cost of renovations, additions, replacements, and new construction will be indicated for each facility.

The options planning and master planning exercises will be conducted at the close of the assessment. DRAFT

State of School Facilities Report DRAFT - INFORMATION NOT FINALIZED Page 3 ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY FACILITY CONDITION The FCS comprehensive assessment utilized a five-step methodology summarized below. ASSESSMENT 1. Project Kickoff: METHODOLOGY The FCS comprehensive assessment began in May 2015 with a kickoff meeting to establish goals and objectives. 2. Educational Adequacy Guidelines: Jacobs and DeJong-Richter worked with FCS staff Project Kickoff to develop educational adequacy standards based on district specifications, modern school construction guidelines, previous experience, and the district’s 2012-2017 Strategic Plan and Priorities educational requirements. Educational Adequacy 3. Data Gathering: For on-site assessments, the teams were organized into two groups that Guidelines included educational adequacy teams and facility condition assessment teams. • Educational adequacy assessment teams were organized to conduct an inventory of the Data Gathering eight educational adequacy categories at each location. • Facility condition assessment teams evaluated each building’s general condition. They visited each facility and completed assessment forms identifying current deficiencies at each Data Analysis and location, along with building systems and subsystems for each building with the estimated Cost Estimating remaining life. Each team consisted of an architect and a mechanical/electrical/plumbing expert.

Comprehensive Assessment 4. Data Analysis and Cost Estimating: Following the assessments, collected data were reviewed Reports and entered into the MAPPSTM assessment and capital planning database. 5. Comprehensive Assessment Meetings and Reports: A formal preliminary findings review meeting with facility planning staff was conducted. Results from the comprehensive assessment Next Steps were presented, and condition, educational adequacy, and life cycle costs were evaluated based on these results. Where necessary, FCS staff provided valuable input identifying additional needs not addressed in the assessment findings. Next Steps: Data compiled in this assessment will be utilized in long-term facility master planning. Often, before identifying a funding stream or acquiring funding, a district will choose to plan a capital improvement program utilizing facility condition assessment data. By developing decisions based on the prioritization and categorization of needs identified during the assessment, a district can begin planning with an objective foundation for long-term decision making. Combining assessment data with enrollment projections, capacity and utilization data, geographical information data, and community input will help facilitate the development of achievable, long-range options. Such options may include renovations, new construction, school consolidation, attendance area realignment, and possibleDRAFT facility closures.

Page 4 DRAFT - INFORMATION NOT FINALIZED Fulton County School System Page 1 Page

Facility Portfolio

The comprehensive assessment evaluated more than 14.8 million square feet (sq ft) of educational and administrative facilities on 97 campuses. FCS properties that were included in the assessment were 16 high school campuses, 18 middle school campuses, 53 elementary school campuses, and ten administrative campuses. Table 1 summarizes the facilities that were part of the comprehensive assessment (note the assessment did not include all facilities within FCS). Figure 2 summarizes the breakdown of square footage by school or facility type of the facilities assessed and shows that the

majority of FCS’s educational space is in its elementary campuses. DRAFT

Table 1: FCS Facility Portfolio Jacobs Confidential Jacobs Buildings Campuses School/Facility Type Count Sq Ft Middle: 20% Elementary Schools ES 53 99 6,110,564 Elementary: 41% Middle Schools MS 18 37 2,980,970 High Schools HS 16 149 4,937,334 Administrative Admin 10 35 856,949 Total 97 320 14,885,817 97 campuses SQUARE FEET PER STUDENT 320 With a student enrollment of more than 87,600 at the facilities included in the evaluation located bldgs. in over 14.0 million sq ft of instructional space, the gross square feet per student for FCS’s campuses is 160. This figure combines total square feet at a campus, including gymnasiums, media centers, High: 33% cafeterias, administrative offices, and other building support spaces. It does not include stand-alone Admin.: 6% athletic and administrative facilities that are not housed on each campus. Table 2 indicates the Portfolio_FacilityType breakdown of students, permanent square footage, and square feet per student for each type of school Figure 2: Breakdown of Square included in the assessment. Footage by School Type

For reference, according to the 19th Annual School Construction Report by School Planning & Management magazine published in 2014, the national median enrollment and square feet per student for newly-constructed elementary schools was 520 students with 149.6 sq ft/student; middle schools was 705 students with 173.3 sq ft/student; and high schools was 992 students with 174.2 sq ft/ student.

When FCS’s information is compared to these national medians, the district’s elementary schools are typically above the average (154 sq ft/student), and middle schools are below the national average (155 sq ft/student), and high schools are slightly under (171 sq ft/student). Table 2: FCS Square Feet per Student

# of Average Sq Ft/ School Type Campuses # of Students Enrollment Permanent SqFt Student 1970 - 1989: 1990 - 99: 21% Elementary Schools ES 53 39,614 747 6,110,564 154 23% Middle Schools MS 18 19,237 1,069 2,980,970 155 High Schools HS 16 28,800 1,800 4,937,334 171

Total DRAFT 8 7 87,651 1,007 14,028,868 160 Greater than 85 than Greater 21

avg. building age AVERAGE BUILDING AGE Years 85 - 66

Of the facilities that were part of the comprehensive assessment, six percent of FCS’sYears 65 school- 46 buildings 28

were constructed between 2010 and 2015, indicating that a small portion of FCS’s buildingYears 45 - 26 population avg. campus

File name: Facility Portfolio_Building Age Pie Chart • Print area: pie chart • Insert labels into InDesign se InDesign into labels Insert • chart pie area: Print • Chart Pie est.Age Portfolio_Building Facility name: File

is in the beginning of its design life. Compared to the 30-year average life cycle for Years school25 - 16 buildings, about 40 percent of FCS’s buildings may be approaching revitalization based on thisYears 15 average- 6 age. 2000 - 09: 1950 - 69:

39% 9% Figure 3 illustrates the FCS building age breakdown. Under and Years 5 2010 - 15:

1930 - 49: 85 than Greater

2% Years 85 - 66

Figure 3: Building Age of FCS Years 65 - 46 check

Facilities Years 45 - 26

k 46 a 16 - 25 Years 25 - 16

85 16,151,433

26 6 - 15 Years 15 - 6

16 5 Years and Under and Years 5

State of School Facilities Report 3 Page 5

DRAFT - INFORMATION242,521 NOT FINALIZED 6

1,875,617 4

2% Range 0

3,566,981

12%

Greater Than Greater 3,388,688

22%

6,176,932

21%

Less Than Less

900,694

38%

Building Age Building

Grouping

Area

Building Average Age Average Building

years

1992

Building Age Calculation Age Building

Campus Average Age Average Campus 2015 Educational Adequacy

Educational adequacy is defined as the degree to which a school’s facilities can adequately support the instructional mission and methods. It is an essential yet often overlooked element in many districts’ attempts to prepare aging facilities for a 21st century educational paradigm.

The educational adequacy assessment seeks to answer two questions regarding deficiencies:

• First, what can and must be done to bring a particular school to a standard of adequacy that meets educational and instructional needs, and establishes equity? • Second, at what point does a school’s inability to meet educational and instructional needs suggest that it should be replaced all together? These two questions have led to educational adequacy improvement allocations typically totaling up to 30 percent of the overall funding requirement for several districts surveyed by the Jacobs team over the last ten years.

The assessment is a standards-based approach with a foundation in consistency and objectivity. Data are collected and compared to the district-wide standards. Whenever a deficiency is identified, a correction and corresponding cost estimate is prepared. Not all items can be corrected, such as small classrooms or narrow corridors.

THE EIGHT CATEGORIES OF EDUCATIONAL ADEQUACY To comprehensively assess educational adequacy, it is first necessary to understand the components that affect the instructional program. These components can generally be formulated into standards or guidelines to bridge the gap between the programs from which schools are built and a district’s current educational specifications. There are numerous criteria that contribute to educational adequacy; however, they fall into eight major categories, as shown in Figure 4:

1. Infrastructure: Ability of core facilities to meet needs of the student population. It is critical to consider the programs at a particular campus, and the impact these programs have on classroom inventory and student teaching stations. Support for Programs 2. Support for Programs: Provision of special spaces or Infrastructure classrooms that support specific curriculum offerings such as

Technology music, sports, science, and technology programs. Support 3. Technology Support: Presence of infrastructure, data distribution/storage and equipment within classroom and Relationship of Educational Spaces Adequacy laboratory settings. This will also include local area network DRAFTcabling, video distribution systems, electrical outlets, and Supervision & projection or video display screens. Security 4. Supervision and Security: Extent to which physical configurations help or hinder building operation, and include Learning Environment both passive and physical security.

Instructional 5. Instructional Support: Presence of necessary equipment Support Physical within teaching spaces including teacher storage, student storage, Characteristics writing and tack surfaces, sinks, demonstration tables, and fixed audio/video equipment. Figure 4: Categories Assessed for Educational Adequacy 6. Physical Characteristics: Primarily size and shape of individual teaching spaces.

Page 6 DRAFT - INFORMATION NOT FINALIZED Fulton County School System 7. Learning Environment: The degree to which learning areas are comfortable, well-lit, odor- free, controllable, and quiet. 8. Relationship of Spaces: Proximity of instructional spaces to support areas like libraries, restrooms, and student dining and recreational areas. These eight categories set the stage for data collection and subsequent data-generated computer analysis.

FCS EDUCATIONAL ADEQUACY STANDARDS AND PROCESS To establish guidelines for FCS’s educational adequacy assessment, Jacobs combined best practices and standards from previous experience, and aligned with the District’s 2012-2017 Strategic Plan and Priorities. The educational adequacy standards for FCS are detailed under separate cover in the report called Educational Adequacy Assessment Standards, dated 2015. This document represents guidelines that will be used by the educational adequacy assessment team to evaluate educational adequacy in FCS System. The standards have been categorized into eight criteria. These eight criteria form the basis of analysis to determine a weighted Educational Suitability Score for each school.

With standards established and collection vehicles developed, the team conducted the educational adequacy assessments. Each surveyor conducted an interview with the principal or designee and, if necessary, maintenance staff of the school. The interview included questions about the general layout of the school pertaining to safety and security, bus and parent drop-off areas, and other operational- based information.

After the initial interview, the surveyor completed the remainder of the educational adequacy assessment by gathering information pertaining to the site and exterior of the school facility to include number and type of playgrounds, number and type of play fields or athletic fields, and general characteristics of all buildings and structures.

It should be noted that, at any school, certain things can be resolved or upgraded with minimal investment. However, some aspects cannot be realistically resolved without spending more than the replacement value of a structure. For instance, electrical outlets can be added, flooring materials can be changed, and data ports can be installed. However, it is generally cost prohibitive to reconfigure a building’s layout, expand a classroom to house five extra students, or move a library. Therefore, the eight categories are used to identify “deficiencies” that can be repaired or upgraded, and “inadequacies” that simply impact a building’s learning environment. They should be considered when making decisions that will affect the long-term utilization of a particular facility.

It is critical to consider not only the building condition but also the educational adequacy in any assessment as it is no longer enough to provide a sound building; schools must also be educationally effective learning environments. The total addressable educational adequacy costs are included within the total deficiency costs of $351.3 million.DRAFT

State of School Facilities Report DRAFT - INFORMATION NOT FINALIZED Page 7 Facility Condition Assessment and Life Cycle Renewal

FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT SUMMARY A facility condition assessment evaluates the general health of physical facilities by identifying and prioritizing deficiencies that require correction for long-term use of the campus. Observations are typically organized into civil, architectural, structural, mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and roofing disciplines.

The facility condition assessment at FCS included a comprehensive evaluation that assessed both current deficiencies and building system life cycles. At the conclusion of the building assessment, deficiencies were compiled to develop repair costs for each facility.

Life cycle analysis typically looks at the ages of systems in a building to forecast system replacement as it reaches the end of its serviceable life. The existing deficiencies that currently require correction are identified and assigned a priority. An example of a life cycle system replacement might be a roof with a 20-year life that has been in place for 15 years and may be in need of replacement in ten years. An example of a current deficiency might include a broken lighting fixture or an inoperable roof top air conditioning unit.

All members of the survey team recorded existing conditions, identified problems and deficiencies, documented corrective action and quantities, and identified priorities for repair. Published checklists and definitions were used for consistency and completeness of data among the different survey teams. Digital photos were taken at each school to better identify significant deficiencies. Following the assessment, a separate data entry team entered the identified deficiencies, using a specific code structure to ensure accuracy, into the MAPPSTM assessment and capital planning database.

FACILITY DEFICIENCY PRIORITY LEVELS FACILITY Facility deficiencies were compiled into a list for all facilities in FCS’s portfolio. Deficiencies were DEFICIENCY ranked according to five priority levels, with Priority 1 items being the most critical to address: PRIORITY LEVELS • Priority 1 – Mission Critical Concerns: Deficiencies or conditions that may directly Mission Critical Concerns 1 affect the school’s ability to remain open or deliver the educational curriculum. These deficiencies typically include items related to building safety, code compliance, severely 2 Indirect Impact to Educational Mission damaged or failing building components, and other items that require near-term correction. An example of a Priority 1 deficiency may be a fire alarm system replacement. 3 Short-Term Conditions • Priority 2 – Indirect Impact to Educational Mission: Items that may progress to a 4 Long-Term Requirements Priority 1 item if not addressed in the near term. Examples of Priority 2 deficiencies include inadequate roofing that could cause deterioration of integral building systems, and 5 Enhancements DRAFTconditions affecting building envelopes, such as roof and window replacements. • Priority 3 – Short-Term Conditions: Deficiencies that are necessary to the mission of the school, but may not require immediate attention. These items should be considered necessary improvements requiring incorporation in order to maximize efficiency and usefulness of the facility. Examples of Priority 3 items include site improvements and plumbing deficiencies. • Priority 4 – Long-Term Requirements: Items or systems which are likely to require attention within the next five years or would be considered an improvement to the instructional environment. The improvements may be aesthetic or may provide greater functionality. Examples include cabinets, finishes, paving, removal of abandoned equipment, and educational accommodations associated with special programs.

Page 8 DRAFT - INFORMATION NOT FINALIZED Fulton County School System • Priority 5 – Enhancements: These items are deficiencies that are aesthetic in nature or are considered enhancements. Typical deficiencies in this priority may include repainting, recarpeting, improved signage, or other items that provide for an improved facility environment. These items may be optional to FCS, but are generally included under a comprehensive renovation project plan. Table 3 depicts schools or facility type and their associations, in dollars, by priority level. These amounts include both educational adequacy, as well as facility condition-related deficiencies. The table indicates that the highest need is at the elementary schools and are Priority 2, which may have in indirect impact to the educational mission in the near term. Table 3: FCS Building Type Deficiencies by Priority Level Facility Condition Assessment Priority Type Priority 1 Priority 2 Priority 3 Priority 4 Priority 5 Total Schools Elementary Schools $ 25,322,967 $ 51,533,283 $ 22,114,172 $ 14,462,074 $ 14,591,274 $ 128,023,770 Middle Schools $ 14,436,681 $ 26,765,559 $ 8,812,337 $ 12,924,543 $ 10,578,268 $ 73,517,389 High Schools $ 17,322,968 $ 24,490,876 $ 31,434,656 $ 15,775,426 $ 10,307,972 $ 99,331,898 Total Schools $ 57,082,617 $ 102,789,718 $ 6 2,361,165 $ 43,162,043 $ 35,477,514 $ 300,873,057

Other District Facilities Administrative $ 10,144,383 $ 18,018,035 $ 13,545,465 $ 7,796,679 $ 953,836 $ 50,458,399 Total Other Facilities $ 10,144,383 $ 1 8,018,035 $ 1 3,545,465 $ 7,796,679 $ 953,836 $ 5 0,458,399

Grand Total $ 67,227,000 $ 120,807,754 $ 7 5,906,630 $ 50,958,722 $ 36,431,350 $ 351,331,456

FACILITY DEFICIENCY BY BUILDING SYSTEM Facility deficiencies are divided into 12 industry-standard building systems with multiple subsystems and subsystem types. The 12 systems include:

• Site • Interior • Fire and Life Safety • Roofing • Mechanical • Technology Support • Structural • Plumbing • Conveyances • Exterior • Electrical • Specialties

Table 4 shows building system type and their associations, in dollars, by priority. These amounts include both educational adequacy, as well as facility condition-related deficiencies. The table indicates most need is Priority 2 and a significant cost is associated with the mechanical systems. Table 4: FCS Building System Deficiencies by Priority Level

Building System Prioirty 1 Prioirty 2 Prioirty 3 Prioirty 4 Prioirty 5 Total Site $ 293,950 $ 728,673 $ 15,276,206 $ 31,583,157 $ 6,335,175 $ 54,217,161 Roofing $ 56,779,069 $ 538,961 $ 2,432,315 $ 90,278 $ 20,751 $ 59,861,375 Structural $ - $ 168,621 $ 8,235 $ 5,626 $ - $ 182,482 Exterior $ 658,764 $ 7,047,361 $ 6,416,087 $ 929,765 $ 2,187,327 $ 17,239,304 Interior $ - $ 2,026,696 $ 30,356,364 $ 4,294,868 $ 4,576,210 $ 41,254,138 Mechanical $ - $ 94,464,991DRAFT$ 1,560,733 $ 280,529 $ 98,401 $ 96,404,653 Electrical $ 554,589 $ 5,001,301 $ 3,568,917 $ 522,217 $ 6,764,824 $ 16,411,848 Plumbing $ 3,209,683 $ 3,863,421 $ 8,144,771 $ 1,356,584 $ 4,302,943 $ 20,877,401 Fire and Life Safety $ 5,499,939 $ 1,370,445 $ 356,200 $ - $ - $ 7 ,226,585 Technology Support $ - $ - $ 1,220 $ 4,634,976 $ 112,717 $ 4 ,748,913 Conveyances $ - $ - $ 944,601 $ 132,528 $ - $ 1 ,077,130 Specialties $ 231,006 $ 5,597,285 $ 6,840,981 $ 7,128,194 $ 12,033,004 $ 31,830,469 Total $ 67,227,000 $ 120,807,754 $ 75,906,630 $ 50,958,722 $ 36,431,350 $ 351,331,456

State of School Facilities Report DRAFT - INFORMATION NOT FINALIZED Page 9 FACILITY DEFICIENCY BY CATEGORY The Jacobs team has categorized the types of costs associated with FCS facilities. The different types of categories utilized are:

• ADA Compliance – Current deficiencies related to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). • Capital Renewal – Current deficiencies requiring replacement, that have reached or exceeded serviceable life. These are current and do not include forecasted renewals. • Code Compliance – Deficiencies related to current codes. Many of these code compliance items may fall under grandfather clauses, allowing the buildings to operate under the codes that were in effect at the time of construction but are no longer current. • Deferred Maintenance – Planned work which corrects deficiencies that have been postponed beyond the regular life expectancy of the system/facility. • Functional Deficiency – Deficiencies for a component or system that has failed before the end of its expected life or to address the eight educational adequacy categories. • Routine Maintenance – Deficiencies that are related to preventive or cyclical maintenance that are an essential part of the on-going care of a building. Table 5 outlines each deficiency category and its association, in dollars, by priority. The category ‘Capital Renewal’ yields a total deficiency, in dollars, of $267.0 million. Many capital renewal costs consist of older building systems that have reached the end of their life. Priority 2 deficiencies are the highest at $120.8 million. Table 5: Deficiency Category by Priority

Deficiency Category Priority 1 Priority 2 Priority 3 Priority 4 Priority 5 Total ADA Compliance $ 256,172 $ 609,338 $ 2,242,672 $ 100,376 $ - $ 3 ,208,559 Capital Renewal $ 60,609,417 $ 112,776,789 $ 59,612,365 $ 31,113,447 $ 2,931,634 $ 267,043,651 Code Compliance $ 5,495,282 $ - $ 3,338,627 $ - $ 8,285 $ 8 ,842,193 Deferred Maintenance $ 73,763 $ 1,351,189 $ 2,902,926 $ 9,023,850 $ 6,894,393 $ 2 0,246,121 Functional Deficiency $ 788,305 $ 6,042,348 $ 7,687,411 $ 10,687,859 $ 26,518,166 $ 5 1,724,089 Routine Maintenance $ 4,061 $ 28,089 $ 122,629 $ 33,191 $ 78,872 $ 266,843 Total $ 67,227,000 $ 120,807,754 $ 7 5,906,630 $ 50,958,722 $ 36,431,350 $ 351,331,456

LIFE CYCLE RENEWAL The final component of the assessment is the life cycle renewal forecast. The life cycle of building systems and components plays a major role in properly developing a long-range master facilities plan. During the facilities condition assessment, all major building systems were inspected. If the assessor identified a need for immediate replacement, a deficiency was created with the associated repair costs for the particular item. The identified deficiency contributes to the total current repair costs for a given facility.

However, capital planning scenarios occur over a number of years, as opposed to being constrained toDRAFT immediate repairs. Construction projects may be initiated several years after the initial facility condition assessment. Hence, it is necessary to forecast any future costs associated with a facility beyond the current year repair costs. This is accomplished by utilizing a 10-year life cycle renewal forecast model.

Life cycle renewal may be defined as the projection of future building system costs based upon each individual system’s expected serviceable life. Building systems and components age over time, eventually break down, and reach the end of their useful life, at which point they may require replacement. While an item may be in good condition now, it is possible for it to reach its end of life before the date of a planned construction project.

Facilities are divided into 11 industry-standard building systems that have life cycle renewal needs, with multiple subsystems and subsystem types. The 11 systems include:

Page 10 DRAFT - INFORMATION NOT FINALIZED Fulton County School System • Site • Mechanical • Technology Support • Roofing • Electrical • Conveyances • Exterior • Plumbing • Specialties • Interior • Fire and Life Safety Life cycle data for FCS was obtained during the facility condition assessment and is shown in Tables 6 through 9 below, categorized by system type and by building type, respectively. The district can expect to spend approximately $123.3 million on life cycle renewal items in the next 5 years, with nearly 32% of the costs being related to interior finishes. In years 6-10 the district can anticipate an additional $469.5 million, with approximately 35% of theses life cycle renewal costs being associated with the interior finishes. In total, it is anticipated that the district will experience $592.7 million in life cycle renewal over the next ten years. Table 6: 5-year Life Cycle Forecast by Building System Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 5 Year Building System 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Sub Total Site $ 125,676 $ 241,684 $ 5,010,841 $ 876,415 $ 4,384,448 $ 1 0,639,064 Roofing $ - $ 192,066 $ 134,479 $ 281,500 $ 8,297,642 $ 8 ,905,687 Exterior $ - $ 933,352 $ 2,076,534 $ 520,242 $ 2,977,489 $ 6 ,507,617 Interior $ - $ 4,016,447 $ 9,667,343 $ 18,236,267 $ 7,466,144 $ 3 9,386,201 HVAC $ 5,927,277 $ 2,172,463 $ 1,372,135 $ 3,077,313 $ 4,925,808 $ 1 7,474,996 Plumbing $ 1,825,152 $ 3,179,401 $ 520,863 $ 1,421,420 $ 2,149,813 $ 9 ,096,649 Electrical $ 1,918,988 $ 3,758,958 $ 1,155,372 $ 1,058,980 $ 4,111,905 $ 1 2,004,203 Technology Support $ 259,470 $ 1,208,348 $ 4,757 $ 638,506 $ 885,602 $ 2 ,996,683 Fire and Life Safety $ 3,174,574 $ 3,524,906 $ 1,279,383 $ 1,614,070 $ 1,222,705 $ 1 0,815,638 Conveyances $ 117,565 $ 188,464 $ - $ - $ 117,565 $ 423,594 Specialties $ - $ 814,973 $ 736,151 $ 1,880,672 $ 1,587,664 $ 5 ,019,460 Total $ 13,348,702 $ 20,231,062 $ 21,957,858 $ 29,605,385 $ 38,126,785 $ 123,269,792

Table 7: 10-year Life Cycle Forecast by Building System Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 6-10 Year Total Building System 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Sub Total Site $ 3,455,266 $ 15,182,881 $ 19,334,192 $ 91,840 $ 9,031,867 $ 4 7,096,046 $ 57,735,110 Roofing $ 1,594,314 $ 5,008,941 $ 4,562,475 $ 2,354,442 $ 41,420,447 $ 5 4,940,619 $ 63,846,306 Exterior $ 342,808 $ 9,775,271 $ 4,022,537 $ 3,168,495 $ 4,868,587 $ 2 2,177,698 $ 28,685,315 Interior $ 37,199,862 $ 30,278,260 $ 32,562,063 $ 46,738,301 $ 19,306,031 $ 166,084,517 $ 2 05,470,718 HVAC $ 5,568,169 $ 10,033,504 $ 13,620,478 $ 7,929,508 $ 26,347,073 $ 6 3,498,732 $ 80,973,728 Plumbing $ 5,362,337 $ 5,177,819 $ 3,241,259 $ 7,506,811 $ 2,205,818 $ 2 3,494,044 $ 32,590,693 Electrical $ 243,428 $ 528,822 $ 3,843,413 $ 773,079 $ 11,823,260 $ 1 7,212,002 $ 29,216,205 Technology Support $ 136,594 $ 389,785 $ 3,928,882 $ 850,297 $ 259,020 $ 5,564,578 $ 8,561,261 Fire and Life Safety $ 13,181,946 $ 9,201,010 $ 7,412,719 $ 21,678,251 $ 2,395,792 $ 5 3,869,718 $ 64,685,356 Conveyances $ 167,345 $ 137,477 $ 117,565 $ - $ 127,521 $ 549,908 $ 9 73,502 Specialties $ 7,375,862 $ 2,311,086 $ 1,559,052 $ 1,249,490 $ 2,470,345 $ 1 4,965,835 $ 19,985,295 Total $ 74,627,931 $ 88,024,856 $ 94,204,635 $ 92,340,514 $ 120,255,761 $ 469,453,697 $ 5 92,723,489

Table 8: 5-year Life Cycle Forecast by Building Type Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 5 Year Facility Type 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Sub Total Schools Elementary Schools $ 1,596,400 $ 6,545,656 $ 9,229,349 $ 10,854,627 $ 18,056,116 $ 46,282,148 Middle Schools $ 198,318 $ 6,801,089 $ 4,737,160 $ 9,079,987 $ 6,319,025 $ 27,135,579 High Schools $ 66,954 $ 3,769,333 $ 7,218,509 $ 6,968,568 $ 10,661,085 $ 28,684,449 Total Schools $ 1,861,672 $ 17,116,078 $ 21,185,018 $ 26,903,182 $ 35,036,226 $ 1 02,102,176

Other District Facilities Administrative $ 11,487,030 $ 3,114,984DRAFT$ 772,840 $ 2,702,203 $ 3,090,559 $ 21,167,616 Total Other Facilities $ 11,487,030 $ 3,114,984 $ 772,840 $ 2,702,203 $ 3,090,559 $ 21,167,616

Grand Total $ 13,348,702 $ 20,231,062 $ 21,957,858 $ 29,605,385 $ 38,126,785 $ 1 23,269,792

Table 9: 10-year Life Cycle Forecast by Building Type Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 6-10 Year Total Facility Type 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Sub Total Schools Elementary Schools $ 29,664,856 $ 38,559,960 $ 36,213,323 $ 36,987,060 $ 50,946,198 $ 192,371,397 $ 238,653,545 Middle Schools $ 17,176,878 $ 21,791,523 $ 16,610,113 $ 20,639,079 $ 28,644,260 $ 104,861,853 $ 131,997,432 High Schools $ 24,130,250 $ 23,551,707 $ 32,989,074 $ 32,216,377 $ 32,427,059 $ 145,314,467 $ 173,998,916 Total Schools $ 7 0,971,984 $ 83,903,190 $ 8 5,812,510 $ 89,842,516 $ 1 12,017,517 $ 442,547,717 $ 544,649,893

Other District Facilities Administrative $ 3,655,947 $ 4,121,666 $ 8,392,125 $ 2,497,998 $ 8,238,244 $ 26,905,980 $ 48,073,596 Total Other Facilities $ 3,655,947 $ 4,121,666 $ 8,392,125 $ 2,497,998 $ 8,238,244 $ 26,905,980 $ 4 8,073,596

Grand Total $ 7 4,627,931 $ 88,024,856 $ 9 4,204,635 $ 92,340,514 $ 1 20,255,761 $ 4 69,453,697 $ 592,723,489

*Not all disciplines that have facility deficiencies have life cycle renewal deficiencies.

State of School Facilities Report DRAFT - INFORMATION NOT FINALIZED Page 11 FACILITY CONDITION INDEX FACILITY The Facility Condition Index (FCI) is a widely used indicator that provides a relative scale of the overall CONDITION INDEX condition of a given facility or group of facilities within a portfolio. The index is derived by dividing Total Building the total repair cost, including educational adequacy and site-related repairs, by the total replacement Repair Cost cost. A campus-level FCI encompasses the site and the combination of all structures belonging to that campus. An economic analysis generally suggests that FCIs over 50 percent may represent the point ÷ where facilities should be considered for replacement. This value typically indicates the point where further expenditures on a building offer little return when compared to the potential cost of replacing Total that facility. Replacement To get an understanding of the needs of the district in the near future, the values discussed below are Cost “Five-year FCIs” These values take into account the current deficiencies as well as the life cycle costs needed over the next five years. = <5% 6 - 11 - 21 - 31% - 50% Greater than 51% Facility Condition 10% 20% 30% Index (FCI) Best Average Below Poor Very Poor Good Average Figure 5: FCI Rating Scale

It is important to note that this FCI replacement threshold is not conclusive, but is intended to initiate planning discussions in which other relevant issues with regard to a facility’s disposition must be incorporated. This merely suggests where conversations regarding replacement might occur. Other factors such as historical significance, community sentiment, and enrollment trends will create additional variables for replacement consideration.

5-YEAR FCI BY CAMPUS Table 10 and Figure 6 show the range of 5-year FCIs at the campus level within FCS. The majority of the campus 5-year FCI’s are less than 20 percent, indicating that the overall health of the district is good to average. A campus condition summary is found in Appendix A.

Table 10: FCI by Campus

FCI Campuses Area <10% 41 7,291,748 45 10-19% 22 3,393,766 41 20-29% 13 1,867,242 40 30-39% 10 1,282,233 35 40-49% 5 700,408 30 DRAFT>50% 6 350,420 25 22 Total 9 7 14,885,817 20 15 13 10

Campus Count 10 5 6 5 -

Figure 6: Campus FCI Range

Page 12 DRAFT - INFORMATION NOT FINALIZED Fulton County School System 5-YEAR FCI BY BUILDING Table 11 and Figure 7 show the range of 5-year FCIs at the building level within FCS. This chart indicates that the majority of FCS buildings have a 5-year FCI less than 10 percent. A building condition summary is found in Appendix B.

Table 11: FCI by Building Area

FCI Buildings Area <10% 196 8 ,378,874 250 10-19% 4 7 3 ,365,691 196 20-29% 3 1 1 ,582,467 200 30-39% 1 6 638,698 150 40-49% 1 2 636,001 >50% 1 8 284,086 100 Total 320 14,885,817 47

Building Count Building 50 31 16 12 18 -

Figure 7: Building FCI Range

SOFT COSTS AND REPLACEMENT COST MODELS For planning and budgeting purposes, facility assessments customarily add a soft cost multiplier onto deficiency repair cost estimates. This soft cost multiplier accounts for a markup that districts typically incur when contracting for renovation and construction services. Soft costs typically include construction cost factors, such as contractor overhead and profit, as well as labor and material inflation, professional fees, and district administrative costs. District administrative costs include testing, permitting, legal, and advertising fees, as well as contingencies and escalation to the midpoint of construction. All stated costs in this assessment summary report include a soft cost markup for planning and budgeting purposes. These are estimates, and costs will vary at the time of construction.

Replacement cost models for each facility type were developed based on RSMEANS® and industry experience. Replacement cost models are developed on a cost per square foot basis. These values are applied to the actual square footage of the facility in order to estimate the actual replacement cost.

Both soft cost and replacement cost models were reviewed with FCS for accuracy and applicability to ensure that they align with costs that the district has experienced previously. Table 12 shows the soft cost model developed for FCS.

Table 12: Soft Cost Model

Soft Cost Model Contractor GC, OH & Profit 30% Inflation RSMeans Figures 12 Mos DRAFT3% Construction Contingency 5% Temporary Housing and Security 4.5% Professional Design and Consulting Fees 14% Contingency 2% Administration Expense 3.1% Escalation to Midpoint of Construction 36 Mos 3% Construction Cost Factor: 38% Soft Cost Factor: 36%

State of School Facilities Report DRAFT - INFORMATION NOT FINALIZED Page 13

Over the next five years, anticipated deficiencies and life cycle renewal forecast are expected to reach $474.6 million in facility-related improvement needs for near term construction programs. Facility condition assessments revealed $351.3 million of current deficiencies, with over 25% being related to mechanical systems. The projected 5-year life cycle renewal needs for FCS’s facilities are estimated to be $123.3 million. Nearly 32 percent of the estimated costs are related to the interior finishes, which include flooring, ceilings, walls, painting, and interior doors.

In years 6-10 the life cycle renewal forecast is anticipated to be $469.5. Approximately 35 percent of the estimated costs are related to the interior finishes. The total anticipated deficiencies and life cycle renewal forecast over the next ten years are expected to reach $944.1 million in facility-related improvement needs for long-term planning purposes.

The Facility Condition Index (FCI) is a recognized formula that provides a general indicator of a building’s health. The majority of FCS’s campus and building five-year FCIs are less than 20 percent, indicating that the majority of the district is in average to good health.

Table 13 presents the current facility deficiencies, the 5-year life cycle renewal forecast and the 10-year life cycle renewal forecast projecting future costs by facility type. These figures exclude any classroom additions or new construction for additional enrollment growth or program expansion.

Table 13: Combined 5 and 10-Year Need

Elementary Schools Middle Schools High Schools Administration Total Deficiency Type Current Deficiencies $ 128,023,770 $ 73,517,389 $ 99,331,898 $ 50,458,399 $ 351,331,456 5 Yr Life Cycle $ 46,282,148 $ 27,135,579 $ 28,684,449 $ 21,167,616 $ 123,269,792 Total 5 Yr Need $ 174,305,918 $ 100,652,968 $ 128,016,347 $ 71,626,015 $ 474,601,248

6-10 Yr Life Cycle $ 192,371,397 $ 104,861,853 $ 145,314,467 $ 26,905,980 $ 469,453,697 Total 10 Yr Need $ 366,677,315 $ 205,514,821 $ 273,330,814 $ 98,531,995 $ 944,054,945

DRAFT

Page 14 DRAFT - INFORMATION NOT FINALIZED Fulton County School System Appendix A - Campus Condition Summary

The following charts provide a summary for each campus showing facility condition cost, total replacement cost, facility condition index, and 5-year and 10-year life cycle cost forecast.

Const. 10 Year Life Educational Campus Name Total Area Facility Condition Cost Total Replacement Cost FCI Condition Score 5 Year Life Cycle 6-10 Year Life Cycle Year Cycle Adequacy Score

Elementary Schools Abbotts Hill Elementary School 2000 108,426 $ 1,057,804 $ 23,576,150 4.5% 95.5% $ 259,028 $ 5,867,950 $ 6,126,978 85.65 Alpharetta Elementary School 2011 116,761 $ 413,195 $ 25,388,512 1.6% 98.4% $ 113,786 $ 2,962,518 $ 3,076,304 84.62 Barnwell Elementary School 2011 121,862 $ 569,374 $ 26,497,673 2.1% 97.9% $ 527,671 $ 3,610,952 $ 4,138,623 87.95 Birmingham Falls Elementary School 2010 117,317 $ 371,776 $ 25,509,409 1.5% 98.5% $ - $ 1,742,068 $ 1,742,068 88.49 Brookview Elementary School 1988 78,993 $ 1,580,589 $ 17,176,238 9.2% 90.8% $ 1,312,151 $ 2,916,148 $ 4,228,299 77.76 Campbell Elementary School 2004 130,685 $ 7,490,932 $ 28,416,148 26.4% 73.6% $ 2,737,628 $ 1,575,398 $ 4,313,026 86.38 Cliftondale Elementary School 2009 117,137 $ 325,705 $ 25,470,270 1.3% 98.7% $ - $ 1,284,231 $ 1,284,231 91.80 Cogburn Woods Elementary School 2004 116,284 $ 1,603,005 $ 25,284,794 6.3% 93.7% $ 1,243,812 $ 2,756,312 $ 4,000,124 87.65 Conley Hills Elementary School 1989 98,690 $ 7,561,872 $ 21,459,154 35.2% 64.8% $ 1,679,326 $ 1,522,958 $ 3,202,284 80.69 Crabapple Crossing Elementary School 1992 106,855 $ 1,721,396 $ 23,234,552 7.4% 92.6% $ 43,142 $ 3,535,788 $ 3,578,930 87.23 Creek View Elementary School 2001 114,428 $ 732,951 $ 25,589,534 2.9% 97.1% $ 2,117,354 $ 4,865,963 $ 6,983,317 89.21 Dolvin Elementary School 2005 134,880 $ 998,340 $ 29,328,308 3.4% 96.6% $ - $ 1,247,309 $ 1,247,309 88.27 Dunwoody Springs Elementary School 2000 114,428 $ 1,911,578 $ 24,881,224 7.7% 92.3% $ 261,662 $ 4,826,619 $ 5,088,281 86.69 Evoline C. West Elementary School 2003 112,690 $ 4,884,635 $ 24,503,314 19.9% 80.1% $ 410,702 $ 4,868,699 $ 5,279,401 85.15 Feldwood Elementary School 2011 117,137 $ 322,954 $ 25,470,270 1.3% 98.7% $ - $ 729,201 $ 729,201 86.05 Findley Oaks Elementary School 1994 118,017 $ 3,768,072 $ 25,661,616 14.7% 85.3% $ 1,489,477 $ 3,066,271 $ 4,555,748 90.56 Hamilton E. Holmes Elementary School 2004 124,307 $ 1,690,460 $ 27,029,314 6.3% 93.7% $ 1,778,739 $ 5,681,412 $ 7,460,151 84.94 Hapeville Elementary School 1989 121,516 $ 1,398,421 $ 26,422,439 5.3% 94.7% $ 1,405,290 $ 3,670,117 $ 5,075,407 83.83 Hembree Springs Elementary School 2015 114,642 $ 1,907,621 $ 24,927,756 7.7% 92.3% $ 72,984 $ 4,625,587 $ 4,698,571 88.17 Heritage Elementary School 2000 110,972 $ 434,761 $ 24,129,752 1.8% 98.2% $ 1,224,187 $ 6,608,521 $ 7,832,708 86.58 High Point Elementary School 2007 108,255 $ 2,606,447 $ 23,538,967 11.1% 88.9% $ 171,441 $ 2,419,346 $ 2,590,787 78.89 Hillside Elementary School 2001 114,428 $ 942,042 $ 24,881,224 3.8% 96.2% $ 510,189 $ 5,178,476 $ 5,688,665 85.34 Ison Springs Elementary School 2009 123,612 $ 344,142 $ 26,878,194 1.3% 98.7% $ - $ 1,085,452 $ 1,085,452 83.80 Lake Forest Elementary School 2008 126,320 $ 666,769 $ 27,467,022 2.4% 97.6% $ - $ 4,946,472 $ 4,946,472 84.65 Lake Windward Elementary School 1990 107,213 $ 3,216,447 $ 23,312,394 13.8% 86.2% $ 2,352,118 $ 5,410,253 $ 7,762,371 90.91 Liberty Point Elementary School 2002 114,428 $ 868,252 $ 24,881,224 3.5% 96.5% $ 272,308 $ 6,999,939 $ 7,272,247 91.00 Love T. Nolan Elementary School 2009 187,666 $ 2,611,231 $ 40,806,095 6.4% 93.6% $ 391,748 $ 4,734,582 $ 5,126,330 79.55 Manning Oaks Elementary School 1998 108,426 $ 3,212,049 $ 23,576,150 13.6% 86.4% $ 609,664 $ 2,447,275 $ 3,056,939 89.96 Mary M. Bethune Elementary School 2009 107,066 $ 2,457,977 $ 23,280,431 10.6% 89.4% $ 1,316,126 $ 5,909,388 $ 7,225,514 84.05 Medlock Bridge Elementary School 1991 106,855 $ 1,182,547 $ 23,234,552 5.1% 94.9% $ 2,545,070 $ 2,028,875 $ 4,573,945 89.97 Mimosa Elementary School 2009 134,730 $ 4,793,319 $ 29,295,692 16.4% 83.6% $ 343,932 $ 3,536,014 $ 3,879,946 81.52 Mountain Park Elementary School 2009 169,155 $ 515,362 $ 36,781,063 1.4% 98.6% $ 254,956 $ 4,009,469 $ 4,264,425 79.78 New Prospect Elementary School 1994 105,824 $ 4,469,733 $ 23,010,370 19.4% 80.6% $ 1,248,750 $ 1,391,277 $ 2,640,027 87.49 Northwood Elementary School 1996 109,621 $ 3,200,610 $ 23,835,990 13.4% 86.6% $ 2,327,003 $ 2,545,527 $ 4,872,530 83.17 Oak Knoll Elementary School 1989 95,898 $ 5,269,132 $ 20,852,062 25.3% 74.7% $ 2,003,616 $ 1,657,861 $ 3,661,477 - Oakley Elementary School 2007 122,250 $ 399,790 $ 26,582,040 1.5% 98.5% $ 240,874 $ 4,621,257 $ 4,862,131 84.27 Ocee Elementary School 2000 114,428 $ 375,157 $ 24,881,224 1.5% 98.5% $ 500,634 $ 4,305,684 $ 4,806,318 86.04 Palmetto Elementary School 1971 147,770 $ 1,654,701 $ 32,131,110 5.1% 94.9% $ 1,977,034 $ 4,516,083 $ 6,493,117 76.98 Parklane Elementary School 1989 87,600 $ 5,835,641 $ 19,047,744 30.6% 69.4% $ 4,001,790 $ 1,350,846 $ 5,352,636 81.10 Randolph Elementary School 1991 97,370 $ 4,659,957 $ 21,172,134 22.0% 78.0% $ 1,413,239 $ 5,647,554 $ 7,060,793 83.43 Renaissance Elementary School 2006 116,284 $ 500,954 $ 25,284,794 2.0% 98.0% $ 23,011 $ 2,806,644 $ 2,829,655 87.63 River Eves Elementary School 1996 109,621 $ 4,994,895 $ 23,835,990 21.0% 79.0% $ 189,165 $ 6,094,667 $ 6,283,832 85.34 Roswell North Elementary School 2009 125,587 $ 1,150,235 $ 27,307,638 4.2% 95.8% $ 427,949 $ 4,460,531 $ 4,888,480 85.07 Seaborn Lee Elementary School 1988 80,469 $ 3,185,089 $ 17,497,180 18.2% 81.8% $ 595,686 $ 3,928,239 $ 4,523,925 83.98 Shakerag Elementary School 1997 114,912 $ 1,514,276 $ 24,986,466 6.1% 93.9% $ 1,546,957 $ 3,173,756 $ 4,720,713 86.11 SL Lewis Elementary School 1989 88,810 $ 5,723,729 $ 19,310,847 29.6% 70.4% $ 1,406,168 $ 4,076,176 $ 5,482,344 75.10 Spalding Drive Elementary School 1988 83,162 $ 2,348,518 $ 18,082,746 13.0% 87.0% $ 205,915 $ 1,538,932 $ 1,744,847 82.58 State Bridge Crossing Elementary School 1996 109,621 $ 3,456,701 $ 23,835,990 14.5% 85.5% $ 1,215,323 $ 3,039,303 $ 4,254,626 85.04 Stonewall Tell Elementary School 1998 108,426DRAFT$ 5,376,721 $ 23,576,150 22.8% 77.2% $ 311,340 $ 4,965,090 $ 5,276,430 88.64 Summit Hill Elementary School 1999 108,426 $ 1,489,105 $ 23,576,150 6.3% 93.7% $ 11,818 $ 4,431,367 $ 4,443,185 88.01 Sweet Apple Elementary School 1998 128,253 $ 5,923,691 $ 27,887,333 21.2% 78.8% $ 904,311 $ 4,730,786 $ 5,635,097 82.35 Wilson Creek Elementary School 2004 116,284 $ 504,910 $ 25,284,794 2.0% 98.0% $ 36,140 $ 1,989,646 $ 2,025,786 87.90 Woodland Elementary School 2007 135,767 $ 1,828,201 $ 29,521,176 6.2% 93.8% $ 250,934 $ 4,430,608 $ 4,681,542 80.10 Subtotals: 6,110,564 128,023,770 1,329,389,363 9.6% 90.4% $ 46,282,148 $ 192,371,397 $ 238,653,545

State of School Facilities Report DRAFT - INFORMATION NOT FINALIZED Page 15 Const. 10 Year Life Educational Campus Name Total Area Facility Condition Cost Total Replacement Cost FCI Condition Score 5 Year Life Cycle 6-10 Year Life Cycle Year Cycle Adequacy Score

Middle Schools Autrey Mill Middle School 2003 186,850 $ 717,575 $ 41,785,268 1.7% 98.3% $ - $ 8,311,074 $ 8,311,074 84.43 Bear Creek Middle School 2001 170,604 $ 2,825,879 $ 38,152,172 7.4% 92.6% $ 3,376,833 $ 5,787,101 $ 9,163,934 81.23 Camp Creek Middle School 2007 119,632 $ 5,492,121 $ 26,753,306 20.5% 79.5% $ 3,938,702 $ 2,609,478 $ 6,548,180 76.71 Crabapple Middle School 2010 123,288 $ 10,941,494 $ 27,570,895 39.7% 60.3% $ 826,453 $ 3,811,487 $ 4,637,940 79.65 Elkins Pointe Middle School 2001 177,651 $ 3,815,335 $ 39,728,092 9.6% 90.4% $ 2,228,043 $ 8,101,247 $ 10,329,290 82.46 Haynes Bridge Middle School 2007 126,720 $ 1,297,234 $ 28,338,394 4.6% 95.4% $ 1,245,417 $ 5,760,206 $ 7,005,623 79.17 Holcomb Bridge Middle School 2007 121,542 $ 8,844,112 $ 27,180,437 32.5% 67.5% $ 24,168 $ 849,566 $ 873,734 75.48 Hopewell Middle School 2015 206,316 $ 4,786,277 $ 46,138,448 10.4% 89.6% $ 1,422,605 $ 4,392,008 $ 5,814,613 86.63 Northwestern Middle School 1996 173,175 $ 10,743,162 $ 38,727,128 27.7% 72.3% $ 1,405,707 $ 7,325,651 $ 8,731,358 86.69 Paul D. West Middle School 2001 177,651 $ 5,887,107 $ 38,628,432 15.2% 84.8% $ 1,853,301 $ 11,364,554 $ 13,217,855 84.24 Renaissance Middle School 2008 180,500 $ 799,754 $ 40,365,216 2.0% 98.0% $ 888,946 $ 4,120,158 $ 5,009,104 88.59 Ridgeview Middle School 2010 180,848 $ 2,080,715 $ 40,443,039 5.1% 94.9% $ 959,353 $ 4,769,697 $ 5,729,050 84.27 River Trail Middle School 2001 177,651 $ 1,425,735 $ 39,728,092 3.6% 96.4% $ 416,158 $ 10,657,333 $ 11,073,491 87.68 Sandtown Middle School 2005 179,783 $ 1,001,887 $ 40,204,872 2.5% 97.5% $ 563,076 $ 5,538,288 $ 6,101,364 87.03 Sandy Springs Middle School 2002 162,272 $ 1,400,396 $ 35,284,424 4.0% 96.0% $ 1,868,277 $ 3,758,941 $ 5,627,218 85.05 Taylor Road Middle School 2007 156,582 $ 2,046,119 $ 34,878,463 5.9% 94.1% $ 583,781 $ 3,715,630 $ 4,299,411 85.32 Webb Bridge Middle School 1996 173,375 $ 8,234,474 $ 38,771,852 21.2% 78.8% $ 3,503,668 $ 8,957,825 $ 12,461,493 87.6 Woodland Middle School 2007 186,530 $ 1,178,012 $ 41,713,704 2.8% 97.2% $ 2,031,091 $ 5,031,609 $ 7,062,700 81.87 Subtotals: 2,980,970 $ 73,517,389 $ 664,392,233 11.1% 88.9% $ 27,135,579 $ 104,861,853 $ 131,997,432

High Schools Alpharetta High School 2008 346,671 $ 4,115,053 $ 75,856,428 5.4% 94.6% $ 593,894 $ 11,179,538 $ 11,773,432 86.76 Benjamin Banneker High School 2013 346,764 $ 1,942,386 $ 76,187,497 2.5% 97.5% $ 10,441 $ 3,915,849 $ 3,926,290 90.56 Cambridge High School 2013 328,037 $ 8,441 $ 72,134,409 0.0% 100.0% $ - $ 1,600,150 $ 1,600,150 84.53 Centennial High School 2012 307,527 $ 12,209,671 $ 64,775,291 18.8% 81.2% $ 1,339,959 $ 22,065,139 $ 23,405,098 83.74 Chattahoochee High School 2012 301,217 $ 9,656,314 $ 63,517,831 15.2% 84.8% $ 1,925,177 $ 5,466,165 $ 7,391,342 85.90 Creekside High School 2012 267,065 $ 4,615,768 $ 58,034,555 8.0% 92.0% $ 3,092,519 $ 7,608,486 $ 10,701,005 83.41 Frank McClarin High School 1958 95,205 $ 10,416,916 $ 18,009,001 57.8% 42.2% $ 2,254,130 $ 2,485,792 $ 4,739,922 57.94 Johns Creek High School 2012 351,265 $ 2,183,705 $ 42,786,305 5.1% 94.9% $ - $ 6,296,694 $ 6,296,694 89.62 Langston Hughes High School 2009 381,414 $ 1,606,657 $ 81,528,045 2.0% 98.0% $ 782,430 $ 17,183,272 $ 17,965,702 91.28 Milton High School 2008 364,199 $ 2,979,912 $ 78,716,542 3.8% 96.2% $ 3,256,063 $ 6,581,982 $ 9,838,045 85.40 North Springs High School 2015 305,314 $ 6,464,641 $ 66,835,856 9.7% 90.3% $ 1,487,502 $ 6,995,942 $ 8,483,444 81.80 Northview High School 2014 333,936 $ 1,262,886 $ 69,986,236 1.8% 98.2% $ 44,453 $ 8,144,131 $ 8,188,584 85.10 Riverwood High School 2005 253,940 $ 22,807,022 $ 55,786,505 40.9% 59.1% $ 2,653,604 $ 6,386,702 $ 9,040,306 78.62 Roswell High School 2010 304,560 $ 11,303,155 $ 63,752,316 17.7% 82.3% $ 1,907,707 $ 9,819,866 $ 11,727,573 84.33 Tri-Cities High School 2010 303,546 $ 4,253,126 $ 65,785,916 6.5% 93.5% $ 6,953,859 $ 18,832,582 $ 25,786,441 79.49 Westlake High School 2015 346,674 $ 3,506,246 $ 74,746,723 4.7% 95.3% $ 2,382,711 $ 10,752,177 $ 13,134,888 88.26 Subtotals: 4,937,334 $ 99,331,898 $ 1,028,439,458 9.7% 90.3% $ 28,684,449 $ 145,314,467 $ 173,998,916

Administrative Instructional Technology Center 1999 208,192 $ 10,277,702 $ 46,131,183 22.3% 77.7%$ 11,259,554 $ 1,357,564 $ 12,617,118 - Maintenance North/Kimball Bridge Center 1949 47,670 $ 4,838,021 $ 9,851,005 49.1% 50.9% $ 257,743 $ 1,315,071 $ 1,572,814 - Maintenance South 1990 16,298 $ 970,560 $ 3,367,982 28.8% 71.2% $ 546,327 $ 196,792 $ 743,119 -

Milton Center 1995 266,241 $ 19,488,695 $ 58,227,333 33.5% 66.5% $ 1,624,664 $ 12,936,639 $ 14,561,303 - North Fulton Center 2010 57,435 $ 4,770,746 $ 12,488,667 38.2% 61.8% $ 215,575 $ 3,130,699 $ 3,346,274 -

The Meadows Operation Center 1963 48,036 $ 4,812,966 $ 9,926,639 48.5% 51.5% $ 1,217,631 $ 1,092,648 $ 2,310,279 - Teaching Museum South 1950 40,458 $ 1,930,661 $ 7,814,307 24.7% 75.3% $ 2,028,313 $ 182,457 $ 2,210,770 -

Transportation Center North 2000 55,440 $ 1,269,977 $ 6,855,156 18.5% 81.5% $ 933,044 $ 5,484,304 $ 6,417,348 - Transportation Center South 1975 31,451 $ 956,523 $ 3,888,916 24.6% 75.4% $ 1,393,968 $ 170,134 $ 1,564,102 - Warehouse/Wickersham 2000 85,728 $ 1,142,549 $ 17,715,691 6.4% 93.6% $ 1,690,797 $ 1,039,672 $ 2,730,469 -

Subtotals: 856,949 $ 50,458,399 $ 176,266,879 28.6% 71.4% $ 21,167,616 $ 26,905,980 $ 48,073,596 Totals: DRAFT 14,885,817 $ 351,331,456 $ 3,198,487,931 11.0% 89.0% $ 123,269,792 $ 469,453,697 $ 592,723,489

Page 16 DRAFT - INFORMATION NOT FINALIZED Fulton County School System Appendix B - Building Condition Summary

The following table contains condition information for the specific buildings located on FCS’s campuses. These values are totaled at the campus level for the tables and data presented in this report. Note the totals for building condition summary do not include site deficiencies and will differ from campus condition summary. Condition Campus Name Building Name Facility Condition Cost Total Replacement Cost FCI 5 Year Life Cycle 6-10 Year Life Cycle 10 Year Life Cycle Score

Elementary Schools

Abbotts Hill Elementary School 2000 Building $ 816,591 $ 23,576,150 3.5% 96.5% $ 259,028 $ 5,835,473 $ 6,094,501 Alpharetta Elementary School 1956/1961/1965 Building $ 194,773 $ 10,673,477 1.8% 98.2% $ 55,059 $ 1,008,743 $ 1,063,802 Alpharetta Elementary School 1988 Addition $ 165,834 $ 11,722,843 1.4% 98.6% $ 58,727 $ 1,093,589 $ 1,152,316 Alpharetta Elementary School 2011 Addition $ 51,110 $ 2,992,192 1.7% 98.3% $ - $ 269,333 $ 269,333 Barnwell Elementary School 1985/89 Building $ 375,328 $ 19,814,872 1.9% 98.1% $ 527,671 $ 3,198,843 $ 3,726,514 Barnwell Elementary School 1987 Addition $ 7,574 $ 1,588,182 0.5% 99.5% $ - $ 234,755 $ 234,755 Barnwell Elementary School 2011 Addition $ 17,727 $ 5,094,620 0.3% 99.7% $ - $ 177,354 $ 177,354 Birmingham Falls Elementary School Main Bldg $ 238,019 $ 25,470,270 0.9% 99.1% $ - $ 1,731,154 $ 1,731,154 Birmingham Falls Elementary School Pump House Building $ - $ 39,139 0.0% 100.0% $ - $ 10,914 $ 10,914 Brookview Elementary School 1972/73/95 Building $ 723,272 $ 11,432,995 6.3% 93.7% $ 878,334 $ 1,422,029 $ 2,300,363 Brookview Elementary School 1988/95/2010 Additions $ 473,569 $ 5,743,243 8.2% 91.8% $ 342,947 $ 1,296,678 $ 1,639,625 Campbell Elementary School 1996 Building $ 6,581,153 $ 21,932,304 30.0% 70.0%$ 2,651,795 $ 679,913 $ 3,331,708 Campbell Elementary School 2004 Addition $ 459,892 $ 6,431,658 7.2% 92.8% $ 22,995 $ 648,874 $ 671,869 Campbell Elementary School Storage Building $ 376 $ 52,186 0.7% 99.3% $ - $ 14,445 $ 14,445 Cliftondale Elementary School 2009 Building $ 325,705 $ 25,470,270 1.3% 98.7% $ - $ 1,284,231 $ 1,284,231 Cogburn Woods Elementary School 2004 Building $ 1,565,717 $ 25,284,794 6.2% 93.8% $ 740,656 $ 2,634,424 $ 3,375,080 Conley Hills Elementary School 1953/57 Building $ 4,606,611 $ 10,524,966 43.8% 56.2% $ 661,859 $ 412,863 $ 1,074,722 Conley Hills Elementary School 1989 Addition $ 2,714,260 $ 10,912,444 24.9% 75.1% $ 968,036 $ 1,110,095 $ 2,078,131 Conley Hills Elementary School Shed $ - $ 21,744 0.0% 100.0% $ - $ - $ - Crabapple Crossing Elementary School 1992 Building $ 1,615,483 $ 23,234,552 7.0% 93.0% $ 43,142 $ 3,054,602 $ 3,097,744 Creek View Elementary School 2001 Building $ 627,133 $ 25,589,534 2.5% 97.5%$ 1,516,539 $ 4,740,114 $ 6,256,653 Dolvin Elementary School 1979 Building $ 282,383 $ 11,413,426 2.5% 97.5% $ - $ 740,920 $ 740,920 Dolvin Elementary School 1982/89 Additions $ 158,630 $ 7,184,000 2.2% 97.8% $ - $ 10,487 $ 10,487 Dolvin Elementary School 1989 Addition $ 42,856 $ 2,789,103 1.5% 98.5% $ - $ 82,626 $ 82,626 Dolvin Elementary School 2005 Addition - 4th & 5th Grade $ 145,766 $ 7,941,779 1.8% 98.2% $ - $ 111,341 $ 111,341 Dunwoody Springs Elementary School 2000 Building $ 1,265,977 $ 24,881,224 5.1% 94.9% $ 261,662 $ 4,472,900 $ 4,734,562 Evoline C. West Elementary School 1970 Building $ 2,863,435 $ 9,021,586 31.7% 68.3% $ 225,192 $ 1,698,009 $ 1,923,201 Evoline C. West Elementary School 1989 Addition $ 1,748,820 $ 9,219,456 19.0% 81.0% $ 185,510 $ 1,397,097 $ 1,582,607 Evoline C. West Elementary School 2003 Addition $ 163,500 $ 6,262,272 2.6% 97.4% $ - $ 1,097,447 $ 1,097,447 Feldwood Elementary School Bldg 2010 $ 272,162 $ 25,470,270 1.1% 98.9% $ - $ 729,201 $ 729,201 Findley Oaks Elementary School 1994 Building + Addition $ 3,690,433 $ 25,661,616 14.4% 85.6%$ 1,489,477 $ 3,066,271 $ 4,555,748 Hamilton E. Holmes Elementary School 2004 Building $ 1,584,208 $ 27,029,314 5.9% 94.1%$ 1,778,739 $ 4,975,625 $ 6,754,364 Hapeville Elementary School 1949 Building $ 334,925 $ 11,571,070 2.9% 97.1% $ 443,460 $ 1,724,334 $ 2,167,794 Hapeville Elementary School 1958 Addition Gym $ 33,475 $ 1,883,683 1.8% 98.2% $ 93,927 $ 461,134 $ 555,061 Hapeville Elementary School 1966 Addition $ 64,194 $ 1,240,713 5.2% 94.8% $ 177,775 $ 150,175 $ 327,950 Hapeville Elementary School 1989 Addition $ 186,467 $ 11,726,974 1.6% 98.4% $ 690,128 $ 1,240,948 $ 1,931,076 Hembree Springs Elementary School 2001 Building $ 1,753,834 $ 24,881,224 7.0% 93.0% $ 72,984 $ 3,986,891 $ 4,059,875 Hembree Springs Elementary School Courtyard Observatory Building $ - $ 46,532 0.0% 100.0% $ - $ - $ - Heritage Elementary School 2000 Building $ 428,444 $ 24,129,752 1.8% 98.2% $ 935,456 $ 6,608,521 $ 7,543,977 High Point Elementary School 1987 Addition $ 561,656 $ 4,392,288 12.8% 87.2% $ 5,323 $ 590,250 $ 595,573 High Point Elementary School 2007 Addition $ 300,299 $ 4,923,277 6.1% 93.9% $ 154,033 $ 407,787 $ 561,820 High Point Elementary School Equipment Shed $ - $ 52,186 0.0% 100.0% $ - $ 18,102 $ 18,102 High Point Elementary School Main Building $ 1,421,044 $ 14,171,217 10.0% 90.0% $ 12,085 $ 1,336,765 $ 1,348,850 Hillside Elementary School 2001 Building $ 572,982 $ 24,881,224 2.3% 97.7% $ 510,189 $ 5,056,687 $ 5,566,876 Ison Springs Elementary School 2009 Building $ 296,371 $ 26,878,194 1.1% 98.9% $ - $ 1,085,452 $ 1,085,452 Lake Forest Elementary School 2008 Building $ 485,724 $ 27,467,022 1.8% 98.2% $ - $ 4,144,016 $ 4,144,016 Lake Windward Elementary School 1990 Building $ 2,188,821 $ 23,312,394 9.4% 90.6%$ 2,352,118 $ 5,206,176 $ 7,558,294 Liberty Point Elementary School 2002 Building $ 397,214 $ 24,881,224 1.6% 98.4% $ 272,308 $ 6,842,920 $ 7,115,228 Love T. Nolan Elementary School 1975 Building $ 1,339,580 $ 27,926,906 4.8% 95.2% $ 129,058 $ 2,103,866 $ 2,232,924 Love T. Nolan Elementary School 1989 Addition $ 1,083,328 $ 8,123,994 13.3% 86.7% $ 13,552 $ 2,151,848 $ 2,165,400 Love T. Nolan Elementary School 2010 Addition DRAFT$ 53,029 $ 4,668,220 1.1% 98.9% $ - $ 414,213 $ 414,213 Love T. Nolan Elementary School Storage Building $ 1,877 $ 86,976 2.2% 97.8% $ 744 $ 9,456 $ 10,200 Manning Oaks Elementary School 1998 Building $ 2,569,741 $ 23,576,150 10.9% 89.1% $ 609,664 $ 2,245,277 $ 2,854,941 Mary M. Bethune Elementary School 1968 Building $ 1,754,210 $ 11,741,760 14.9% 85.1% $ 866,385 $ 3,173,961 $ 4,040,346 Mary M. Bethune Elementary School 1989 Addition $ 189,157 $ 5,541,241 3.4% 96.6% $ 449,741 $ 2,333,414 $ 2,783,155 Mary M. Bethune Elementary School 2010 Addition $ 149,149 $ 5,997,430 2.5% 97.5% $ - $ 189,711 $ 189,711 Medlock Bridge Elementary School 1991/92 Building $ 582,525 $ 23,234,552 2.5% 97.5%$ 2,545,070 $ 1,998,135 $ 4,543,205 Mimosa Elementary School 1968/1969 Building and Additions $ 2,466,565 $ 13,289,281 18.6% 81.4% $ 31,820 $ 2,069,455 $ 2,101,275 Mimosa Elementary School 1986 Addition $ 541,803 $ 2,791,930 19.4% 80.6% $ 164,738 $ 355,957 $ 520,695 Mimosa Elementary School 1989 Addition $ 1,211,293 $ 6,865,016 17.6% 82.4% $ 20,496 $ 616,065 $ 636,561 Mimosa Elementary School 2009 Addition $ 30,140 $ 6,349,466 0.5% 99.5% $ - $ 464,902 $ 464,902

Mountain Park Elementary School 1973/76 Buildings $ 215,704 $ 22,193,448 1.0% 99.0% $ 227,739 $ 2,455,047 $ 2,682,786 Mountain Park Elementary School 1989 Addition $ 141,405 $ 8,561,048 1.7% 98.3% $ 27,217 $ 1,158,644 $ 1,185,861 Mountain Park Elementary School 2010 Addition $ 66,285 $ 6,026,567 1.1% 98.9% $ - $ 319,651 $ 319,651 New Prospect Elementary School 1994 Building $ 4,273,589 $ 23,010,370 18.6% 81.4%$ 1,248,750 $ 1,391,277 $ 2,640,027 Northwood Elementary School 1996 Building $ 3,035,038 $ 23,835,990 12.7% 87.3%$ 2,327,003 $ 2,030,398 $ 4,357,401 Oak Knoll Elementary School 1963/64/66 Building $ 3,598,430 $ 12,662,619 28.4% 71.6%$ 1,418,362 $ 982,812 $ 2,401,174 Oak Knoll Elementary School 1989 Additions $ 1,010,064 $ 8,163,350 12.4% 87.6% $ 266,193 $ 608,774 $ 874,967 Oak Knoll Elementary School Storage Building $ - $ 26,093 0.0% 100.0% $ - $ 8,271 $ 8,271 Oakley Elementary School Main Bldg $ 294,205 $ 26,582,040 1.1% 98.9% $ 240,874 $ 4,568,087 $ 4,808,961 Ocee Elementary School 2000 Building $ 362,242 $ 24,881,224 1.5% 98.5% $ 500,634 $ 4,162,176 $ 4,662,810 Palmetto Elementary School Main Bldg and Additions $ 1,485,238 $ 32,131,110 4.6% 95.4%$ 1,977,034 $ 3,762,200 $ 5,739,234 Parklane Elementary School 1953/58/59 Building $ 4,647,657 $ 17,539,798 26.5% 73.5%$ 3,638,179 $ 821,796 $ 4,459,975 Parklane Elementary School 1989 Gym Addition $ 93,190 $ 1,475,330 6.3% 93.7% $ 281,627 $ 232,387 $ 514,014

State of School Facilities Report DRAFT - INFORMATION NOT FINALIZED Page 17 Condition Campus Name Building Name Facility Condition Cost Total Replacement Cost FCI 5 Year Life Cycle 6-10 Year Life Cycle 10 Year Life Cycle Score

Parklane Elementary School Shed $ - $ 32,616 0.0% 100.0% $ 8,271 $ - $ 8,271 Randolph Elementary School 1991 Building $ 4,416,012 $ 21,172,134 20.9% 79.1%$ 1,413,239 $ 5,346,588 $ 6,759,827 Renaissance Elementary School 2006 Building $ 474,739 $ 25,284,794 1.9% 98.1% $ 23,011 $ 2,330,310 $ 2,353,321 River Eves Elementary School 1996 Building $ 4,816,790 $ 23,835,990 20.2% 79.8% $ 189,165 $ 5,670,591 $ 5,859,756 Roswell North Elementary School 1960/64/65/76 Building $ 484,439 $ 11,156,629 4.3% 95.7% $ 182,626 $ 2,509,878 $ 2,692,504 Roswell North Elementary School 1989 Addition $ 352,988 $ 9,332,090 3.8% 96.2% $ 233,794 $ 1,252,549 $ 1,486,343 Roswell North Elementary School 2009 Addition $ 115,867 $ 6,818,919 1.7% 98.3% $ 11,529 $ 571,226 $ 582,755 Seaborn Lee Elementary School 1970/72 Building $ 2,415,828 $ 11,850,480 20.4% 79.6% $ 362,229 $ 2,667,392 $ 3,029,621 Seaborn Lee Elementary School 1988 Addition $ 744,956 $ 5,646,700 13.2% 86.8% $ 233,457 $ 1,100,517 $ 1,333,974 Shakerag Elementary School 1997 Building $ 1,286,611 $ 24,986,466 5.1% 94.9%$ 1,546,957 $ 3,017,160 $ 4,564,117 SL Lewis Elementary School 1973/1974 Building $ 3,685,774 $ 11,967,463 30.8% 69.2% $ 866,591 $ 2,441,739 $ 3,308,330 SL Lewis Elementary School 1989 Addition $ 1,488,474 $ 7,343,384 20.3% 79.7% $ 539,577 $ 1,440,328 $ 1,979,905 Spalding Drive Elementary School 1966-67 Building $ 1,675,171 $ 11,562,155 14.5% 85.5% $ 142,098 $ 987,169 $ 1,129,267 Spalding Drive Elementary School 1988 Addition $ 543,139 $ 4,916,536 11.0% 89.0% $ 63,817 $ 130,377 $ 194,194 Spalding Drive Elementary School Gym $ 43,056 $ 1,604,055 2.7% 97.3% $ - $ 421,386 $ 421,386 State Bridge Crossing Elementary School 1996 Building $ 3,405,289 $ 23,835,990 14.3% 85.7%$ 1,215,323 $ 3,039,303 $ 4,254,626 Stonewall Tell Elementary School 1998 Building $ 5,305,535 $ 23,576,150 22.5% 77.5% $ 311,340 $ 4,384,078 $ 4,695,418 Summit Hill Elementary School 1999 Building $ 1,470,648 $ 23,576,150 6.2% 93.8% $ 11,818 $ 4,419,340 $ 4,431,158 Sweet Apple Elementary School 1997 Building $ 4,565,272 $ 24,986,466 18.3% 81.7% $ 809,408 $ 3,977,556 $ 4,786,964 Sweet Apple Elementary School 1998 Addition $ 506,606 $ 2,900,867 17.5% 82.5% $ 94,903 $ 569,153 $ 664,056 Wilson Creek Elementary School 2004 Building $ 373,220 $ 25,284,794 1.5% 98.5% $ 36,140 $ 1,989,646 $ 2,025,786 Woodland Elementary School 1971/73 Building $ 775,906 $ 15,880,078 4.9% 95.1% $ 80,150 $ 2,229,748 $ 2,309,898 Woodland Elementary School 1988 Addition $ 181,101 $ 8,126,385 2.2% 97.8% $ 17,645 $ 1,444,700 $ 1,462,345 Woodland Elementary School 2007 Addition $ 137,566 $ 5,488,621 2.5% 97.5% $ 51,637 $ 648,580 $ 700,217 Woodland Elementary School Storage Building $ 8,271 $ 26,093 31.7% 68.3% $ - $ - $ - Subtotals: $ 113,272,449 $ 1,329,389,369 8.5% 91.5% $ 43,816,759 $ 181,317,602 $ 225,134,361

Middle Schools

Autrey Mill Middle School 2003 Building $ 420,915 $ 41,785,268 1.0% 99.0% $ - $ 8,311,074 $ 8,311,074 Bear Creek Middle School 1989 Building $ 1,755,348 $ 33,732,572 5.2% 94.8%$ 3,115,752 $ 5,717,767 $ 8,833,519 Bear Creek Middle School 2001 Addition $ 328,060 $ 4,344,460 7.6% 92.4% $ 261,081 $ 68,459 $ 329,540 Bear Creek Middle School Storage Building #1 $ 939 $ 53,671 1.7% 98.3% $ - $ 625 $ 625 Bear Creek Middle School Storage Building #2 $ 376 $ 21,468 1.7% 98.3% $ - $ 250 $ 250 Camp Creek Middle School 1985/89 Building $ 5,078,956 $ 23,617,342 21.5% 78.5%$ 3,870,134 $ 1,319,031 $ 5,189,165 Camp Creek Middle School 2007 Addition $ 202,721 $ 3,135,964 6.5% 93.5% $ 68,568 $ 276,035 $ 344,603 Crabapple Middle School 1983 Building $ 8,448,943 $ 20,653,572 40.9% 59.1% $ 478,939 $ 2,882,217 $ 3,361,156 Crabapple Middle School 1989 Addition $ 1,570,805 $ 4,008,344 39.2% 60.8% $ 4,517 $ 381,515 $ 386,032 Crabapple Middle School 2007 Addition $ 79,680 $ 2,852,624 2.8% 97.2% $ 37,282 $ 380,876 $ 418,158 Crabapple Middle School Equipment Shed $ - $ 56,355 0.0% 100.0% $ - $ - $ - Elkins Pointe Middle School 2001 Building $ 3,008,674 $ 39,728,092 7.6% 92.4%$ 2,228,043 $ 6,282,784 $ 8,510,827 Haynes Bridge Middle School 1983 Building $ 266,842 $ 20,664,754 1.3% 98.7%$ 1,180,551 $ 4,187,123 $ 5,367,674 Haynes Bridge Middle School 1989 Addition $ 104,788 $ 4,655,082 2.3% 97.7% $ - $ 676,623 $ 676,623 Haynes Bridge Middle School 2007 Addition $ 58,049 $ 2,954,152 2.0% 98.0% $ - $ 476,814 $ 476,814 Haynes Bridge Middle School Storage Building #1 $ - $ 32,203 0.0% 100.0% $ 5,899 $ - $ 5,899 Haynes Bridge Middle School Storage Building #2 $ - $ 32,203 0.0% 100.0% $ - $ 3,534 $ 3,534 Holcomb Bridge Middle School 1983 Building $ 7,213,569 $ 20,653,572 34.9% 65.1% $ - $ 267,949 $ 267,949 Holcomb Bridge Middle School 1989 Addition $ 1,147,610 $ 3,674,241 31.2% 68.8% $ - $ 187,041 $ 187,041 Holcomb Bridge Middle School 2007 Addition $ 61,291 $ 2,852,624 2.1% 97.9% $ - $ 252,489 $ 252,489 Hopewell Middle School 2005 Building $ 4,534,616 $ 40,214,936 11.3% 88.7% $ 653,253 $ 3,646,134 $ 4,299,387 Hopewell Middle School 2015 Addition $ - $ 5,923,512 0.0% 100.0% $ - $ 343,304 $ 343,304 Northwestern Middle School 1996 Building $ 9,917,363 $ 38,727,128 25.6% 74.4% $ 972,610 $ 7,052,932 $ 8,025,542 Paul D. West Middle School 2003 Building $ 4,849,261 $ 38,628,432 12.6% 87.4%$ 1,331,037 $ 11,200,494 $ 12,531,531 Renaissance Middle School 2008 Building $ 540,248 $ 40,365,216 1.3% 98.7% $ 194,718 $ 3,876,580 $ 4,071,298 Ridgeview Middle School 1968/69 Building $ 698,509 $ 29,936,678 2.3% 97.7% $ 583,001 $ 3,168,242 $ 3,751,243 Ridgeview Middle School 2010 Addition $ 179,187 $ 10,506,361 1.7% 98.3% $ 185,549 $ 621,484 $ 807,033 River Trail Middle School 2001 Building $ 450,168 $ 39,728,092 1.1% 98.9% $ 416,158 $ 10,251,360 $ 10,667,518 Sandtown Middle School 2005 Building $ 985,441 $ 40,204,872 2.5% 97.5% $ 563,076 $ 5,244,053 $ 5,807,129 Sandy Springs Middle School 2002 Building $ 1,053,270 $ 35,284,424 3.0% 97.0%$ 1,726,190 $ 3,758,941 $ 5,485,131 Taylor Road Middle School 1991 Building $ 1,107,177 $ 31,308,200 3.5% 96.5% $ 552,573 $ 2,780,867 $ 3,333,440 Taylor Road Middle School 2007 Addition DRAFT$ 108,693 $ 3,327,615 3.3% 96.7% $ - $ 125,510 $ 125,510 Taylor Road Middle School Equipment Shed #1 $ - $ 22,363 0.0% 100.0% $ 10,441 $ - $ 10,441 Taylor Road Middle School Equipment Shed #2 $ - $ 56,355 0.0% 100.0% $ - $ 8,271 $ 8,271 Taylor Road Middle School Softball Concession/Press Box $ - $ 163,931 0.0% 100.0% $ 20,767 $ 93,192 $ 113,959 Webb Bridge Middle School 1997 Building $ 7,502,150 $ 38,771,852 19.3% 80.7%$ 2,887,991 $ 8,225,427 $ 11,113,418 Woodland Middle School 2007 Building $ 1,038,491 $ 41,713,704 2.5% 97.5%$ 2,031,091 $ 4,222,321 $ 6,253,412 Subtotals: $ 62,712,138 $ 664,392,234 9.4% 90.6% $ 23,379,221 $ 96,291,318 $ 119,670,539

Page 18 DRAFT - INFORMATION NOT FINALIZED Fulton County School System Condition Campus Name Building Name Facility Condition Cost Total Replacement Cost FCI 5 Year Life Cycle 6-10 Year Life Cycle 10 Year Life Cycle Score

High Schools Alpharetta High School Band Hall $ 19,161 $ 1,657,640 1.2% 98.8% $ 32,366 $ 153,030 $ 185,396 Alpharetta High School Concession & Restrooms Lower East $ - $ 46,751 0.0% 100.0% $ 7,346 $ 3,225 $ 10,571 Alpharetta High School Concession & Restrooms Upper East $ - $ 255,003 0.0% 100.0% $ 22,191 $ 45,628 $ 67,819 Alpharetta High School Field House $ - $ 333,933 0.0% 100.0% $ - $ 123,206 $ 123,206 Alpharetta High School Football Stadium- Press Box $ 6,196 $ 246,260 2.5% 97.5% $ - $ 38,840 $ 38,840 Alpharetta High School Main Bldg $ 1,552,624 $ 73,036,096 2.1% 97.9% $ 525,410 $ 7,831,942 $ 8,357,352 Alpharetta High School Softball Maintenance Building $ - $ 37,886 0.0% 100.0% $ - $ 2,895 $ 2,895 Alpharetta High School Ticket Booth & Restrooms Upper West $ - $ 218,574 0.0% 100.0% $ 5,923 $ 53,147 $ 59,070 Alpharetta High School Ticket Booth Southwest $ 827 $ 24,286 3.4% 96.6% $ 658 $ 5,856 $ 6,514 Benjamin Banneker High School Baseball/Softball Concession $ - $ 102,123 0.0% 100.0% $ - $ 12,461 $ 12,461 Benjamin Banneker High School Bldg 5010 $ 603,544 $ 75,252,336 0.8% 99.2% $ - $ 3,843,188 $ 3,843,188 Benjamin Banneker High School Electrical Building $ - $ 29,249 0.0% 100.0% $ - $ 8,012 $ 8,012 Benjamin Banneker High School Football Storage $ - $ 181,659 0.0% 100.0% $ - $ 4,923 $ 4,923 Benjamin Banneker High School Home Concessions $ - $ 236,060 0.0% 100.0% $ - $ 20,744 $ 20,744 Benjamin Banneker High School Press Box $ - $ 30,358 0.0% 100.0% $ - $ 4,797 $ 4,797 Benjamin Banneker High School Storage A $ - $ 39,884 0.0% 100.0% $ 10,441 $ 866 $ 11,307 Benjamin Banneker High School Storage B $ 8,271 $ 39,884 20.7% 79.3% $ - $ 866 $ 866 Benjamin Banneker High School Storage C $ 8,271 $ 39,884 20.7% 79.3% $ - $ 866 $ 866 Benjamin Banneker High School Visitor Concessions/Tickets $ - $ 236,060 0.0% 100.0% $ - $ 19,126 $ 19,126 Cambridge High School Baseball/Softball Concessions and Restrooms $ - $ 121,430 0.0% 100.0% $ - $ 10,168 $ 10,168 Cambridge High School Bldg 5010 $ 6,318 $ 71,101,696 0.0% 100.0% $ - $ 1,512,200 $ 1,512,200 Cambridge High School Football Stadium $ - $ 346,926 0.0% 100.0% $ - $ 29,885 $ 29,885 Cambridge High School Maintenance Equipment Building $ - $ 363,391 0.0% 100.0% $ - $ - $ - Cambridge High School Sport Concession and Restroom $ - $ 165,752 0.0% 100.0% $ - $ 39,809 $ 39,809 Cambridge High School Ticket Booth #1 $ - $ 17,607 0.0% 100.0% $ - $ 4,044 $ 4,044 Cambridge High School Ticket Booth #2 $ - $ 17,607 0.0% 100.0% $ - $ 4,044 $ 4,044 Centennial High School 1997 Building $ 9,188,967 $ 56,484,288 16.3% 83.7%$ 1,142,193 $ 19,161,775 $ 20,303,968 Centennial High School 2011 Addition $ 77,940 $ 2,518,035 3.1% 96.9% $ - $ 336,772 $ 336,772 Centennial High School 2012 Addition Band $ 2,265 $ 1,691,099 0.1% 99.9% $ - $ 102,597 $ 102,597 Centennial High School Baseball Press Box $ 10,132 $ 54,644 18.5% 81.5% $ 5,036 $ 5,127 $ 10,163 Centennial High School Batting Cage Building $ 21,341 $ 594,521 3.6% 96.4% $ 93,147 $ 88,927 $ 182,074 Centennial High School Concessions/Restroom Building NW $ 27,718 $ 48,572 57.1% 42.9% $ 21,718 $ 55,700 $ 77,418 Centennial High School Equipment Shed $ - $ 51,001 0.0% 100.0% $ 2,021 $ 4,874 $ 6,895 Centennial High School Football Stadium $ 55,977 $ 2,551,973 2.2% 97.8% $ 68,886 $ 243,685 $ 312,571 Centennial High School Football Ticket Booth East $ - $ 7,772 0.0% 100.0% $ 167 $ 17,889 $ 18,056 Centennial High School Football Ticket/Maint Building NE $ 12,623 $ 132,237 9.5% 90.5% $ 6,791 $ 21,478 $ 28,269 Centennial High School Track Equipment Shed $ - $ 51,001 0.0% 100.0% $ - $ 19,982 $ 19,982 Centennial High School Weight Room Building $ - $ 590,150 0.0% 100.0% $ - $ 80,602 $ 80,602 Chattahoochee High School 1991/93 Bldgs + Additions $ 7,213,108 $ 57,983,940 12.4% 87.6%$ 1,873,805 $ 4,976,541 $ 6,850,346 Chattahoochee High School 2012 Addition $ - $ 1,622,630 0.0% 100.0% $ - $ 101,013 $ 101,013 Chattahoochee High School Baseball Concession & Press Box $ 117,664 $ 208,860 56.3% 43.7% $ 29,613 $ 65,065 $ 94,678 Chattahoochee High School Baseball Storage Shed $ - $ 53,429 0.0% 100.0% $ 2,118 $ - $ 2,118 Chattahoochee High School Batting Practice Building $ 43,810 $ 396,348 11.1% 88.9% $ - $ - $ - Chattahoochee High School Concession East $ - $ 106,858 0.0% 100.0% $ - $ 8,389 $ 8,389 Chattahoochee High School Stadium $ 120,268 $ 2,453,615 4.9% 95.1% $ 19,641 $ 77,958 $ 97,599 Chattahoochee High School Ticket Booth North $ - $ 10,929 0.0% 100.0% $ - $ 10,007 $ 10,007 Chattahoochee High School Ticket Booth West $ - $ 10,929 0.0% 100.0% $ - $ 14,061 $ 14,061 Chattahoochee High School Weight Lifting Field House $ - $ 670,294 0.0% 100.0% $ - $ - $ - Creekside High School 1990 Building $ 2,143,983 $ 41,922,052 5.1% 94.9%$ 2,781,630 $ 4,778,711 $ 7,560,341 Creekside High School 1994 Addition $ 94,096 $ 4,785,685 2.0% 98.0% $ 257,707 $ 495,547 $ 753,254 Creekside High School 2007 Addition $ 118,062 $ 7,777,458 1.5% 98.5% $ 1,970 $ 639,968 $ 641,938 Creekside High School 2012 Addition Band Hall $ 11,146 $ 1,721,898 0.6% 99.4% $ - $ 118,087 $ 118,087 Creekside High School Greenhouse $ 3,780 $ 443,160 0.9% 99.1% $ - $ 39,946 $ 39,946 Creekside High School Stadium RR/Concession Bldg $ 23,110 $ 145,716 15.9% 84.1% $ 21,161 $ 72,502 $ 93,663 Creekside High School Stadium/PB/RR/Concession $ 52,538 $ 1,214,300 4.3% 95.7% $ 23,747 $ 79,396 $ 103,143 Creekside High School Ticket Booth - East $ - $ 12,143 0.0% 100.0% $ 3,022 $ 1,350 $ 4,372 Creekside High School Ticket Booth - West $ - $ 12,143 0.0% 100.0% $ 3,282 $ 5,225 $ 8,507 Frank McClarin High School 1943 Bldg and Additions DRAFT$ 6,964,930 $ 14,266,650 48.8% 51.2%$ 1,389,049 $ 1,828,660 $ 3,217,709 Frank McClarin High School 1958/61 Addition Gym $ 2,600,778 $ 3,742,351 69.5% 30.5% $ 833,958 $ 506,511 $ 1,340,469 Johns Creek High School 2010 Building $ 681,781 $ 38,965,064 1.7% 98.3% $ - $ 5,976,486 $ 5,976,486 Johns Creek High School Baseball/Softball Concessions and Restrooms $ - $ 315,718 0.0% 100.0% $ - $ 8,702 $ 8,702 Johns Creek High School Football Stadium $ - $ 2,994,464 0.0% 100.0% $ - $ 257,948 $ 257,948 Johns Creek High School Maintenance Equipment Building $ - $ 292,486 0.0% 100.0% $ - $ - $ - Johns Creek High School Northeast Football Ticket Booth $ - $ 17,607 0.0% 100.0% $ - $ 4,044 $ 4,044 Johns Creek High School Southeast Football Ticket Booth $ - $ 17,607 0.0% 100.0% $ - $ 4,044 $ 4,044 Johns Creek High School Southwest Football Ticket Booth $ - $ 17,607 0.0% 100.0% $ - $ 4,044 $ 4,044 Johns Creek High School Sports Concession & Restroom Building $ - $ 165,752 0.0% 100.0% $ - $ 41,426 $ 41,426 Langston Hughes High School 2009 Building $ 1,120,640 $ 77,615,488 1.4% 98.6% $ 152,755 $ 14,215,145 $ 14,367,900 Langston Hughes High School Football Stadium $ 1,877 $ 2,551,973 0.1% 99.9% $ 6,917 $ 13,874 $ 20,791 Langston Hughes High School Football Ticket Booth & Concessions Bldg $ 14,498 $ 910,725 1.6% 98.4% $ 154,546 $ 50,727 $ 205,273 Langston Hughes High School Maintenance & Equipment Building $ - $ 292,486 0.0% 100.0% $ 10,734 $ - $ 10,734 Langston Hughes High School Sports Concessions Restroom Bulding $ 559 $ 157,373 0.4% 99.6% $ 65,164 $ 7,864 $ 73,028 Milton High School 2005 Building $ 1,238,693 $ 76,101,648 1.6% 98.4%$ 3,197,716 $ 3,030,013 $ 6,227,729 Milton High School Baseball Concession Building $ - $ 83,058 0.0% 100.0% $ 6,548 $ 23,564 $ 30,112

State of School Facilities Report DRAFT - INFORMATION NOT FINALIZED Page 19 Condition Campus Name Building Name Facility Condition Cost Total Replacement Cost FCI 5 Year Life Cycle 6-10 Year Life Cycle 10 Year Life Cycle Score Milton High School Baseball Practice Building $ 36,352 $ 856,810 4.2% 95.8% $ 11,057 $ 118,536 $ 129,593 Milton High School Concession Ticket Booth East $ - $ 245,896 0.0% 100.0% $ 8,377 $ 1,749 $ 10,126 Milton High School Concession Ticket Booth West $ - $ 245,896 0.0% 100.0% $ 8,377 $ - $ 8,377 Milton High School Field House $ 16,320 $ 870,289 1.9% 98.1% $ 21,224 $ 129,675 $ 150,899 Milton High School Stadium $ - $ 102,001 0.0% 100.0% $ 2,764 $ 8,112 $ 10,876 Milton High School Storage Building #1 $ 461 $ 117,881 0.4% 99.6% $ - $ 28,666 $ 28,666 Milton High School Storage Building #2 $ - $ 93,064 0.0% 100.0% $ - $ 2,471 $ 2,471 North Springs High School 1963/64/66 Building $ 1,498,100 $ 23,335,920 6.4% 93.6% $ 86,937 $ 2,058,030 $ 2,144,967 North Springs High School 1993/94 Additions $ 1,281,601 $ 31,439,322 4.1% 95.9% $ 567,505 $ 2,208,527 $ 2,776,032 North Springs High School 2005 Addition $ 542,526 $ 11,071,688 4.9% 95.1% $ 45,851 $ 1,773,517 $ 1,819,368 North Springs High School Baseball Concessions $ - $ 106,858 0.0% 100.0% $ 4,517 $ 78,317 $ 82,834 North Springs High School Field House $ 242 $ 187,002 0.1% 99.9% $ 25,864 $ 104,427 $ 130,291 North Springs High School Press Box $ 2,388 $ 60,715 3.9% 96.1% $ 1,645 $ 3,928 $ 5,573 North Springs High School Softball Concessions $ - $ 106,858 0.0% 100.0% $ - $ 7,952 $ 7,952 North Springs High School Stadium Concessions $ - $ 116,573 0.0% 100.0% $ 10,277 $ 79,073 $ 89,350 North Springs High School Stadium RR/Training $ - $ 124,344 0.0% 100.0% $ 10,552 $ 48,730 $ 59,282 North Springs High School Stadium Storage $ 73,803 $ 272,003 27.1% 72.9% $ - $ 21,012 $ 21,012 North Springs High School Stadium Ticket Booth $ - $ 7,286 0.0% 100.0% $ 353 $ 432 $ 785 North Springs High School Tennis Ticket Booth $ - $ 7,286 0.0% 100.0% $ 353 $ 315 $ 668 Northview High School 2002 Building $ 779,721 $ 63,367,004 1.2% 98.8% $ 39,936 $ 7,276,507 $ 7,316,443 Northview High School 2014 Addition - Band $ 14,845 $ 1,760,453 0.8% 99.2% $ - $ 72,514 $ 72,514 Northview High School Baseball/Softball Building $ 12,681 $ 500,899 2.5% 97.5% $ - $ 52,527 $ 52,527 Northview High School Baseball/Softball Equipment Bldg $ - $ 132,237 0.0% 100.0% $ - $ 3,871 $ 3,871 Northview High School Concession & Restroom Building N $ - $ 213,717 0.0% 100.0% $ 4,517 $ 13,547 $ 18,064 Northview High School Concession & Restroom Building SW $ 1,090 $ 213,717 0.5% 99.5% $ - $ 15,168 $ 15,168 Northview High School Equipment Shed #1 $ - $ 132,237 0.0% 100.0% $ - $ 3,871 $ 3,871 Northview High School Equipment Shed #2 $ - $ 132,237 0.0% 100.0% $ - $ 3,871 $ 3,871 Northview High School Football Field Ticket Booth $ 424 $ 9,836 4.3% 95.7% $ - $ 211 $ 211 Northview High School Football Stadium $ - $ 2,588,888 0.0% 100.0% $ - $ - $ - Northview High School Wrestling Building $ 1,754 $ 935,011 0.2% 99.8% $ - $ 12,062 $ 12,062 Riverwood High School 1971/73 Building $ 14,422,425 $ 34,593,736 41.7% 58.3%$ 1,507,478 $ 1,758,992 $ 3,266,470 Riverwood High School 1995 Addition $ 1,374,902 $ 8,973,547 15.3% 84.7% $ 386,131 $ 1,281,781 $ 1,667,912 Riverwood High School 2005 Addition $ 111,171 $ 11,635,387 1.0% 99.0% $ 715,280 $ 1,240,593 $ 1,955,873 Riverwood High School Baseball Concession $ - $ 110,016 0.0% 100.0% $ 7,099 $ 58,556 $ 65,655 Riverwood High School Baseball Field Press Box $ 28,636 $ 38,858 73.7% 26.3% $ - $ 6,755 $ 6,755 Riverwood High School Football North Concession & Restroom $ 1,730 $ 124,344 1.4% 98.6% $ 15,866 $ 58,358 $ 74,224 Riverwood High School Football North Ticket Booth $ - $ 7,772 0.0% 100.0% $ 1,076 $ 2,455 $ 3,531 Riverwood High School Football South Concession & Restroom $ 1,093 $ 102,001 1.1% 98.9% $ 13,015 $ 58,040 $ 71,055 Riverwood High School Football Stadium Press Box $ 3,004 $ 65,572 4.6% 95.4% $ 6,583 $ 16,641 $ 23,224 Riverwood High School Football West Ticket Booth $ - $ 7,772 0.0% 100.0% $ 1,076 $ 2,163 $ 3,239 Riverwood High School Storage Building $ - $ 127,502 0.0% 100.0% $ - $ 46,059 $ 46,059 Roswell High School 1989 Building + Additions $ 6,595,278 $ 52,458,844 12.6% 87.4% $ 805,277 $ 8,364,107 $ 9,169,384 Roswell High School 1994 Addition $ 546,871 $ 5,069,972 10.8% 89.2% $ 631,871 $ 303,333 $ 935,204 Roswell High School 2007 Addition Band Hall $ 6,143 $ 1,698,411 0.4% 99.6% $ - $ 99,653 $ 99,653 Roswell High School Baseball Field House $ 2,105 $ 388,576 0.5% 99.5% $ 62,261 $ 18,942 $ 81,203 Roswell High School Baseball Practice Building $ - $ 602,779 0.0% 100.0% $ 142,051 $ 24,605 $ 166,656 Roswell High School Concession Building North $ 16,371 $ 75,772 21.6% 78.4% $ 17,046 $ 22,772 $ 39,818 Roswell High School Football Concession Building $ 1,695 $ 102,001 1.7% 98.3% $ 4,950 $ 10,531 $ 15,481 Roswell High School Stadium $ 14,873 $ 2,374,685 0.6% 99.4% $ 86,892 $ 117,802 $ 204,694 Roswell High School Storage Building $ - $ 39,343 0.0% 100.0% $ 22,200 $ 2,625 $ 24,825 Roswell High School Storage Building Football Practice Field $ 879 $ 73,951 1.2% 98.8% $ 29,316 $ 2,931 $ 32,247 Roswell High School Storage Building Lacrosse Field $ 910 $ 63,144 1.4% 98.6% $ 30,234 $ 2,503 $ 32,737 Roswell High School Ticket Booth East $ 367 $ 7,772 4.7% 95.3% $ - $ 10,198 $ 10,198 Roswell High School Ticket Booth West $ 367 $ 7,772 4.7% 95.3% $ - $ 7,919 $ 7,919 Roswell High School Weight Room/Lockers $ 3,900 $ 789,295 0.5% 99.5% $ 75,609 $ 46,060 $ 121,669 Tri-Cities High School 1988 Building $ 1,865,258 $ 46,282,080 4.0% 96.0%$ 4,906,276 $ 15,235,674 $ 20,141,950 Tri-Cities High School 1993/94 Addition $ 129,960 $ 8,357,112 1.6% 98.4% $ 815,458 $ 1,553,052 $ 2,368,510 Tri-Cities High School 2000 Addition $ 346,757 $ 5,060,001 6.9% 93.1% $ 395,351 $ 559,294 $ 954,645 Tri-Cities High School 2010 Addition $ 13,626 $ 4,184,095 0.3% 99.7% $ 63,508 $ 519,067 $ 582,575 Tri-Cities High School Football Stadium DRAFT$ 56,647 $ 1,665,534 3.4% 96.6% $ 118,457 $ 277,589 $ 396,046 Tri-Cities High School Irrigation Pump House $ - $ 17,948 0.0% 100.0% $ 3,474 $ 6,008 $ 9,482 Tri-Cities High School Storage Building $ - $ 97,717 0.0% 100.0% $ 11,766 $ 10,441 $ 22,207 Tri-Cities High School Ticket Booth Southeast $ 2,290 $ 12,143 18.9% 81.1% $ 3,480 $ 1,090 $ 4,570 Tri-Cities High School Ticket Booth, Concession, RR Bldg $ 25,163 $ 109,287 23.0% 77.0% $ 63,805 $ 53,842 $ 117,647 Westlake High School 2009 Building $ 1,107,493 $ 71,748,488 1.5% 98.5% $ 229,061 $ 9,870,771 $ 10,099,832 Westlake High School Baseball Concession Building $ - $ 91,073 0.0% 100.0% $ 50,366 $ 13,280 $ 63,646 Westlake High School Football Main Ticket Booth Bldg $ - $ 156,888 0.0% 100.0% $ 32,135 $ 2,146 $ 34,281 Westlake High School Football North Concession Building $ - $ 120,459 0.0% 100.0% $ 43,225 $ 9,164 $ 52,389 Westlake High School Football South Concession Building $ 96 $ 127,502 0.1% 99.9% $ 42,971 $ 40,019 $ 82,990 Westlake High School Football Stadium $ 51,105 $ 1,622,791 3.1% 96.9% $ 652,645 $ 38,165 $ 690,810 Westlake High School Football Ticket Booth North Bldg $ - $ 7,772 0.0% 100.0% $ 12,472 $ 167 $ 12,639 Westlake High School Old Rifle Range Building $ 27,223 $ 391,753 6.9% 93.1% $ 30,648 $ 30,412 $ 61,060 Westlake High School Softball Storage $ - $ 109,287 0.0% 100.0% $ - $ 2,342 $ 2,342 Westlake High School Stadium Storage $ - $ 273,218 0.0% 100.0% $ 26,782 $ 20,204 $ 46,986 Westlake High School Storage Building $ - $ 97,495 0.0% 100.0% $ 20,883 $ - $ 20,883 Subtotals: $ 65,188,142 $ 1,028,439,467 6.3% 93.7%$ 25,713,557 $ 127,304,713 $ 153,018,270

Page 20 DRAFT - INFORMATION NOT FINALIZED Fulton County School System Condition Campus Name Building Name Facility Condition Cost Total Replacement Cost FCI 5 Year Life Cycle 6-10 Year Life Cycle 10 Year Life Cycle Score

Administrative Instructional Technology Center 1969/72 Building $ 7,547,910 $ 33,043,782 22.8% 77.2%$ 8,238,796 $ 73,454 $ 8,312,250 Instructional Technology Center 1989 Addition $ 1,435,408 $ 5,500,945 26.1% 73.9%$ 1,418,512 $ 10,441 $ 1,428,953 Instructional Technology Center 1995/99 Addition $ 760,808 $ 7,586,456 10.0% 90.0%$ 1,425,825 $ 1,273,669 $ 2,699,494 Maintenance North/Kimball Bridge Center 1949 Building $ 3,622,075 $ 9,728,668 37.2% 62.8% $ 255,818 $ 1,256,076 $ 1,511,894 Maintenance North/Kimball Bridge Center Equipment Shed $ 2,305 $ 39,677 5.8% 94.2% $ - $ 7,236 $ 7,236 Maintenance North/Kimball Bridge Center Repair Shed $ - $ 82,660 0.0% 100.0% $ 1,925 $ 10,319 $ 12,244 Maintenance South 1972 Building $ 613,549 $ 2,624,042 23.4% 76.6% $ 434,781 $ 112,565 $ 547,346 Maintenance South 1990 Glass Shop $ 77,903 $ 743,940 10.5% 89.5% $ 111,546 $ 48,136 $ 159,682 Milton Center 1963 - 1979 Building + Additions $ 10,423,046 $ 30,834,186 33.8% 66.2%$ 1,028,136 $ 6,302,323 $ 7,330,459 Milton Center 1981-1989 Additions $ 3,391,066 $ 13,096,043 25.9% 74.1% $ 405,931 $ 1,828,963 $ 2,234,894 Milton Center 1991-1999 Additions $ 3,450,382 $ 13,367,922 25.8% 74.2% $ 144,231 $ 2,191,102 $ 2,335,333 Milton Center Baseball Press Box $ 21,983 $ 106,858 20.6% 79.4% $ 4,235 $ 23,458 $ 27,693 Milton Center Batting Cage Building $ 137,891 $ 218,574 63.1% 36.9% $ 14,586 $ 43,745 $ 58,331 Milton Center Equipment Shed $ 52,986 $ 95,201 55.7% 44.3% $ - $ 6,353 $ 6,353 Milton Center Press Box and Storage Building $ 316,050 $ 284,146 111.2% -11.2% $ 7,619 $ 200,829 $ 208,448 Milton Center Restrooms & Concession Stand $ 11,852 $ 104,430 11.3% 88.7% $ 9,585 $ 75,184 $ 84,769 Milton Center Restrooms & Concession Stand NE $ 11,852 $ 104,430 11.3% 88.7% $ 9,585 $ 69,053 $ 78,638 Milton Center Ticket Booth Northeast $ 2,148 $ 7,772 27.6% 72.4% $ 378 $ 6,563 $ 6,941 Milton Center Ticket Booth Southwest $ 2,148 $ 7,772 27.6% 72.4% $ 378 $ 6,298 $ 6,676

North Fulton Center 1949 Building $ 3,875,073 $ 8,000,053 48.4% 51.6% $ 192,217 $ 2,477,783 $ 2,670,000 North Fulton Center 1994 Addition $ 855,528 $ 3,954,364 21.6% 78.4% $ 5,698 $ 356,482 $ 362,180 North Fulton Center Greenhouse $ - $ 534,250 0.0% 100.0% $ 17,660 $ - $ 17,660 Teaching Museum South 1950 Building $ 1,629,897 $ 7,791,989 20.9% 79.1%$ 2,013,863 $ 182,457 $ 2,196,320 Teaching Museum South Equipment Shed $ 31,146 $ 22,318 139.6% -39.6% $ - $ - $ - The Meadows Operation Center 1963 Building $ 4,012,876 $ 9,877,870 40.6% 59.4%$ 1,217,631 $ 1,092,255 $ 2,309,886 The Meadows Operation Center Chemical Storage Building $ 30,001 $ 32,237 93.1% 6.9% $ - $ - $ - The Meadows Operation Center Storage Building $ 33,234 $ 16,532 201.0% -101.0% $ - $ - $ - Transportation Center North 2000 Building $ 414,977 $ 5,131,475 8.1% 91.9% $ 671,193 $ 1,001,729 $ 1,672,922 Transportation Center North Fuel Depot Canopy $ - $ 1,656,910 0.0% 100.0% $ - $ 654 $ 654 Transportation Center North Storage Bldg $ 7,087 $ 66,771 10.6% 89.4% $ 2,035 $ 100,415 $ 102,450 Transportation Center South 1972 School Bus Shop $ 535,194 $ 2,157,816 24.8% 75.2% $ 701,625 $ 46,221 $ 747,846 Transportation Center South 1975 Transportation Services $ 229,116 $ 618,250 37.1% 62.9% $ 400,541 $ 44,826 $ 445,367 Transportation Center South Fuel Depot Canopy $ 113,126 $ 1,112,850 10.2% 89.8% $ 195,128 $ - $ 195,128 Warehouse/Wickersham 1954 Building $ 224,412 $ 15,994,710 1.4% 98.6%$ 1,590,071 $ 793,703 $ 2,383,774 Warehouse/Wickersham 2000 Addition $ 14,389 $ 1,720,981 0.8% 99.2% $ 100,726 $ 31,624 $ 132,350

Subtotals: $ 43,887,420 $ 176,266,880 24.9% 75.1%$ 20,620,255 $ 19,673,916 $ 40,294,171

Totals $ 285,060,149 $ 3,198,487,950 8.9% 91.1%$ 113,529,792 $ 424,587,549 $ 538,117,341

DRAFT

State of School Facilities Report DRAFT - INFORMATION NOT FINALIZED Page 21 The facilities evaluation team consists of Jacobs Engineering Inc., DeJong Ricther, and

IntegralGude Program Management, LLC. Jacobs is a leading provider of facilities condition assessment and capital planning services worldwide. We specialize in the K-12 facility assessment and educational planning industry, specifically in educational adequacy and facility assessments, along with other management consulting assignments. Together, our team offers a comprehensive array of professional facility assessment, planning, design, construction, and management related services. The team is nationally recognized in large- scale K-12 assessment and program management assignments, offering Fulton County

School System the experience, expertise, stability and resources required to successfully assess, document, and analyze the district’s facility needs.

We need your help and value your support for this important endeavor. If you have questions or comments about the comprehensive assessment, or have a particular school concern, you can contact:

Mr. Mike Wilbourne Director of Capital Improvements Department 470.254.2228 [email protected]

Mr. Casey Morris Project Director 210.403.5559 [email protected]