DOCSLIB.ORG

U.S. Department of Transportation FY 2017-2018 INFRA Project Applications

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
U.S. Department of Transportation FY 2017-2018 INFRA Project Applications U.S. Department of Transportation FY 2017-2018 INFRA Project Applications Estimated Total Estimated Future # Project Name Applicant Organization State INFRA Request Federal Eligible Project Assistance Costs 1 Port MacKenzie Rail Extension Matanuska-Susitna Borough AK: Alaska $75,000,000 $50,000,000 $125,000,000 Municipality of Anchorage / Port of 2 Port of Anchorage Petroleum/ Cement Terminal AK: Alaska $64,900,000 $65,900,000 $108,100,000 Anchorage CONNECT Mobile - Creating Opportunity Networks for New 3 Alabama Department of Transportation AL: Alabama $250,000,000 $990,000,000 $1,776,339,086 Economic Connections Today Birmingham-Jefferson County Port 4 Port Revitalization and Freight Flow Management Project AL: Alabama $6,800,000 $6,800,000 $18,000,000 Authority Gulf Shores Regional Connectivity and Infrastructure 5 City of Gulf Shores, Alabama AL: Alabama $22,200,000 $22,200,000 $37,000,000 Improvements Project 6 2nd Avenue Connectivity Corridor Project The University of Alabama AL: Alabama $6,025,657 $6,025,657 $16,737,936 7 Interstate 69 (Monticello Bypass - Highway 65) Arkansas Department of Transportation AR: Arkansas $20,000,000 $65,360,000 $81,700,000 8 Interstate 30 - National Freight Corridor Improvements Arkansas Department of Transportation AR: Arkansas $100,000,000 $192,200,000 $609,500,000 9 Interstate 30 (U.S. Highway 70 - Sevier Street) Arkansas Department of Transportation AR: Arkansas $57,900,000 $57,900,000 $181,300,000 10 Securing Multimodal Freight Corridors in the Ozarks City of Fort Smith, Arkansas AR: Arkansas $8,527,892 $8,527,892 $14,213,154 11 Little River County Intermodal Facility Little River County Intermodal Authority AR: Arkansas $10,500,000 $10,500,000 $17,500,000 Northwest Arkansas Regional Planning 12 I-49 Missouri-Arkansas Connector AR: Arkansas $32,364,000 $90,807,000 $169,907,000 Commission Southeast Arkansas and Northeast Louisiana Multimodal Southeast Arkansas Economic 13 AR: Arkansas $29,541,000 $29,541,000 $49,236,051 Freight Corridor Improvement Project Development District, Inc. 14 Widening I-17: Anthem to Sunset Point Arizona Department of Transportaton AZ: Arizona $120,000,000 $240,000,000 $300,000,000 15 Inland Port Arizona and Pinal Logistics Park Phase 1 City of Coolidge AZ: Arizona $9,900,000 $9,900,000 $16,500,000 Butte County Association of Governments 16 State Route 70 Oroville Passing Lane Project CA: California $36,000,000 $36,000,000 $105,450,000 (BCAG) 17 State Route 4 Wagon Trail Realignment Project Calaveras Council of Governments CA: California $14,200,000 $24,527,000 $32,050,000 Border System Management: Applying Advanced 18 California Department of Transportation CA: California $12,000,000 $12,000,000 $36,897,193 Technology to Transportation Corridors at California's Land America's Global Freight Gateway - Southern California 19 California Department of Transportation CA: California $155,000,000 $607,379,000 $975,454,000 Highway Strategy 20 San Mateo County US 101 Managed Lanes Project California Dept of Transportation CA: California $75,000,000 $84,500,000 $513,000,000 Capital SouthEast Connector Joint Powers 21 The Capital SouthEast Connector Expressway Project CA: California $56,200,000 $59,700,000 $113,600,000 Authority Centennial Corridor State Route 58/99 Freight 22 City of Bakersfield CA: California $60,000,000 $146,579,000 $386,637,000 Improvement Project State Route 86 (SR-86)/Avenue 50 New Interchange in City 23 City of Coachella CA: California $35,558,000 $62,843,000 $77,300,000 of Coachella, California Veterans Boulevard: A Regionally Significant Interchange, 24 City of Fresno CA: California $44,500,000 $45,033,520 $112,167,000 Extension and Grade Separation Project State Route 47-Vincent Thomas Bridge & Harbor Bl.-Front City of Los Angeles - Harbor 25 CA: California $12,385,000 $12,385,000 $24,770,000 St. Interchange Project Department(Port of Los Angeles) 26 State Route 120 - McKinley Ave Interchange Project City of Manteca CA: California $12,000,000 $14,900,000 $39,600,000 27 State Route 120 - Union Road Interchange Project City of Manteca CA: California $12,500,000 $12,500,000 $24,350,000 28 SR132 Gateway Express Project City of Modesto CA: California $30,010,000 $30,010,000 $83,065,000 SoCal Freight Gateway: SR-60 Truck Safety and Efficiency 29 City of Moreno Valley CA: California $67,500,000 $67,500,000 $112,500,000 Project - Phase 1 30 SR 52 Congestion Improvement Project City of Santee CA: California $9,108,159 $9,108,159 $15,180,265 31 The I-15/French Valley Parkway Improvements Project City of Temecula CA: California $110,500,000 $159,540,000 $199,548,500 32 Central Valley Gateway City of Tracy CA: California $22,100,000 $22,100,000 $57,600,000 33 SR-133 Laguna Canyon Road Improvement Project County of Orange CA: California $14,400,000 $33,500,000 $43,100,000 Golden Gate Bridge, Highway & 34 The Golden Gate Bridge Seismic Retrofit Project, Phase 3B CA: California $100,000,000 $496,700,000 $691,000,000 Transportation District 35 Lake 29 Expressway 2A & 2B Lake Area Planning Council CA: California $118,800,000 $130,800,000 $198,000,000 America's Global Freight Gateway - Southern California Rail Los Angeles County Metropolitan 36 CA: California $117,190,000 $149,260,000 $654,840,253 Project Transportation Authority Los Angeles County Metropolitan 37 Regional ExpressLanes Accelerator: I-105 HOT Lanes CA: California $80,000,000 $196,519,000 $348,922,000 Transportation Authority Los Angeles County Metropolitan 38 Interstate 5 Golden State Chokepoint Relief Program CA: California $57,000,000 $85,291,000 $603,731,000 Transportation Authority Nevada County Transportation 39 Nevada 49 Widening Project CA: California $37,480,000 $37,480,000 $92,962,000 Commission 40 State Route 55 Improvement Project Orange County Transportation Authority CA: California $75,000,000 $178,805,000 $404,401,000 Port of Hueneme Corridor Optimization & Efficiency 41 Oxnard Harbor District (Port of Hueneme) CA: California $25,800,000 $25,800,000 $43,000,000 Project 1 of 6 U.S. Department of Transportation FY 2017-2018 INFRA Project Applications Estimated Total Estimated Future # Project Name Applicant Organization State INFRA Request Federal Eligible Project Assistance Costs 42 Port of Stockton Fyffe Avenue Grade Separation Port of Stockton CA: California $7,200,000 $7,200,000 $12,000,000 SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF 43 San Diego North Coast Corridor CA: California $84,000,000 $84,000,000 $570,750,000 GOVERNMENTS San Joaquin County Regional Rail 44 San Joaquin Valley Rail Enhancement Project CA: California $35,150,000 $35,150,000 $87,890,000 Commission 45 CA State Route 46/41 "Wye" Intersection Upgrade San Luis Obispo Council of Governments CA: California $81,720,000 $106,720,000 $136,200,000 Santa Barbara County Association of 46 Santa Barbara U.S. 101 Multimodal Corridor CA: California $40,000,000 $65,000,000 $571,340,000 Governments Santa Clara Valley Transportation 47 Silicon Valley Express Lanes Program - Phase 3 CA: California $19,000,000 $19,000,000 $56,300,000 Authority (VTA) 48 North County Corridor Stanislaus, County of CA: California $125,000,000 $245,000,000 $740,000,000 Tulare County Association of 49 Tagus 6-lane Widening Project CA: California $53,588,000 $71,450,000 $89,313,000 Governments (TCAG) 50 Sierra Northern Railway's Rail Improvement Project Tuolumne County Transportation Council CA: California $20,060,000 $20,060,000 $34,000,000 51 I-80 Bus/Carpool Lane Project Yolo County Transportation District CA: California $368,280,000 $368,280,000 $712,225,000 52 I-70/Picadilly Interchange City of Aurora, CO CO: Colorado $15,600,000 $15,600,000 $26,000,000 53 I-70 Westbound Peak Period Shoulder Lane Colorado Department of Transportation CO: Colorado $25,000,000 $25,000,000 $96,600,000 The National Western Center Freight Upgrades for a 54 Denver, City & County of CO: Colorado $13,167,945 $13,167,945 $34,652,488 Stronger Economy 55 I-25 South Gap Project El Paso County CO: Colorado $65,000,000 $65,000,000 $350,000,000 Growing Economies, Growing Communities: North North Front Range Transportation & Air 56 CO: Colorado $86,500,000 $86,500,000 $295,000,000 Interstate 25 Phase II Quality Council 57 Centennial Highway (US85) Betterments Project Weld County CO: Colorado $39,400,000 $51,400,000 $126,800,000 Connecticut Department of CT: 58 Charter Oak Bridge Approach $75,000,000 $87,550,000 $228,000,000 Transportation Connecticut Sustaining Wilmington: Investing in our Future I-95 Corridor 59 Delaware Department of Transportation DE: Delaware $66,000,000 $132,000,000 $165,000,000 Commitments Broward County's Port Everglades Intermodal Freight Broward Metropolitan Planning 60 FL: Florida $50,000,000 $182,755,442 $485,628,398 Container Project Organization 61 Talleyrand Connector Florida Department of Transportation FL: Florida $23,000,000 $23,000,000 $48,000,000 62 North Cargo Berths Improvement Project (Port Canaveral) Florida Department of Transportation FL: Florida $55,354,287 $55,354,287 $110,708,574 63 Golden Glades Truck Travel Center (GGTTC) Florida Department of Transportation FL: Florida $12,000,000 $14,000,000 $20,000,000 Marion County Board of County 64 Northwest 49th/35th Street Phase 2C - Project Resurgence FL: Florida $18,607,531 $18,607,531 $39,330,531 Commissioners Miami-Dade Northeast Coastal Link Rail Infrastructure 65 Miami Dade County FL: Florida $26,400,000 $26,400,000 $88,000,000 Improvements 66 PortMiami Truck Gate Innovation Miami-Dade County FL: Florida $7,000,000 $7,000,000 $15,000,000 67 I-75 at Overpass Road Interchange Pasco , County of FL:
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Infrastructure Status and Needs in Southwestern Pennsylvania
    University of Pittsburgh Institute of Politics Infrastructure Policy Committee Infrastructure Status and Needs in Southwestern Pennsylvania: A Primer Fall 2014 Table of Contents Letter from the Infrastructure Policy Committee Co-Chairs .......................................................... 5 Air Transportation ........................................................................................................................... 7 Key Players ................................................................................................................................. 7 Funding ....................................................................................................................................... 7 Priorities ...................................................................................................................................... 9 Challenges and Opportunities ................................................................................................... 10 Intelligent Transportation Systems ........................................................................................... 11 The FAA Next Generation Air Transportation System ........................................................ 11 Resources .................................................................................................................................. 13 Electricity ...................................................................................................................................... 14 Context .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CODE of COLORADO REGULATIONS 8 CCR 1507-25 Division of State Patrol
    DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY Division of State Patrol RULES AND REGULATIONS CONCERNING THE PERMITTING, ROUTING & TRANSPORTATION OF HAZARDOUS AND NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND THE INTRASTATE TRANSPORTATION OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS IN THE STATE OF COLORADO 8 CCR 1507-25 [Editor’s Notes follow the text of the rules at the end of this CCR Document.] _________________________________________________________________________ AUTHORITY The Chief of the Colorado State Patrol (CSP) is authorized by §42-20-108 (1) and (2) and §§42-20-403, 504, and 508, CRS, to promulgate rules and regulations for the permitting, routing and safe transportation of hazardous and nuclear materials by motor vehicle within the state of Colorado, both in interstate and intrastate transportation. Pursuant to §42-20-108.5, CRS, the Chief of the CSP is authorized to adopt rules and regulations which exempt agricultural products from the hazardous materials rules. APPLICABILITY These rules and regulations shall apply to all persons who transport, ship or cause to be transported or shipped, a hazardous material by motor vehicle over the public roads of this state. COMPLIANCE WITH 8 CCR 1507-1 All commercial vehicles that transport hazardous and/or nuclear materials shall comply with the rules and regulations found at 8 CCR 1507-1, Concerning the Minimum Standards for the Operation of Commercial Vehicles. GENERAL DEFINITIONS Unless otherwise specified, definitions of general applicability throughout these rules are: Enforcement Official: As identified within §42-20-103 (2), CRS, the definition of enforcement official is limited to a peace officer who is an officer of the CSP as described in §§16-2.5-101 and 114, CRS; a certified peace officer who is a certified Port of Entry (POE) officer as described in §§16-2.5-101 and 115, CRS; a peace officer who is an investigating official of the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) transportation section as described in §§16-2.5-101 and 143, CRS; or any peace officer as described in §16-2.5-101, CRS.
    [Show full text]
  • 2006 Fall Newsletter
    MWASeptember 2006 TERRITORY SeptemberPage 2006 HOME OF THE YOUGH RIVERKEEPER® Protecting, preserving and restoring the Indian Creek watershed and surrounding areas. Bike for Health Benefit to be held on October 7, 2006 MWA teams with Laurel Highlands Rotary Club • Our new website should be up The Mountain Watershed Association has recently partnered with the and running within the next Donegal-Laurel Highlands Rotary Club to hold a fundraising bike ride on the month! Please check back with Indian Creek Valley Hike/Bike Trail. The ride, called Bike for Health, will raise us often: mtwatershed.com awareness of and funding for the work MWA is involved in regarding the health • Lottery calendars will be here effects of pollution, as well as Rotary's PolioPlus: Completing Our Promise pro- soon (see inside!). gram that seeks to wipe out polio worldwide. • 2007 entertainment books have The ride will take place on October 7, 2006, beginning at Pavilion #3 in arrived. Call today to C.W. Resh Park, Indian Head, PA. MWA will have environmental education purchase yours! activities set up along the trail for participants. The cost is $25 for the first registered family member and $5 for each additional family member, and the first 20 participants to register the morning of the ride will receive a free t-shirt INSIDE THIS ISSUE: courtesy of MWA. Registration begins at 9am. The Indian Creek Valley Hike/Bike Trail uses a former railroad right of 2 Kalp Project way and the mostly level surface is a perfect ride for families and small children. Groundbreaking A light lunch will be served after the ride by Rotarian volunteers, led by Paul Trimbur at the hot dog grill.
    [Show full text]
  • I-69 Implementation Strategy and Update Report
    I-69 Implementation Strategy Update Report February 2018 Transportation Planning and Programming Division Report Revision History The following table tracks revisions and changes made to this report over time. Date Revision Explanation March 2016 First edition of the report February 2018 • Updates Statewide and District Summaries based on fiscal year (FY) 2018 Unified Transportation Program (UTP) and its December 2017 revision as well as TxDOT’s other internal planning and programming systems as of January 3, 2018 • Includes Advisory Committee $2B project prioritization exercise results I-69 Implementation Strategy Update Report – February 2018 ii Table of Contents Page Preface ....................................................................................................................................... iv List of Acronyms ......................................................................................................................... v Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 1 I-69 System ............................................................................................................................... 1 Importance of the I-69 System to Texas ........................................................................ 3 I-69 System Project Prioritization ............................................................................................. 6 I-69 System Implementation Strategy Update .....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Winter Storm 2004 Hammered the Nation’S Courtesy of Randy West Heartland from the Great Lakes to the Texas Panhandle with Heaping Amounts of Snow and Ice
    The joyful holiday season of 2004 was thrown awry when Heavy snow early in the storm in Harrison County brings traffic to a crawl along mother nature threw in a “large monkey wrench” just before Interstate 64 in southern Indiana. Christmas. Winter Storm 2004 hammered the nation’s Courtesy of Randy West heartland from the Great Lakes to the Texas Panhandle with heaping amounts of snow and ice. This historic event was the biggest winter phenomenon in the Louisville, Kentucky area since the February 1998 and January 1994 major snowstorms. Winter Storm 2004 pounded the Ohio Valley with two heavy bursts of snow and ice separated by only a few hours. Snow fell in southern Indiana at rates approaching 4 inches per hour and totaling up to 30 inches in some areas. In parts of Louisville, up to 6 inches of sleet accumulated with 6-12 inches total of snow and sleet. In some locations across central Kentucky, solid ice layers up to 1-1.5 inches thick blanketed homes, trees, and roadways. Uncommon thunder- snow and thundersleet were observed during this extraordinary Storm Impacts winter storm. To top it all off, bitter cold temperatures as • Very heavy snow accumulations and snow drifts low as -13°F greeted area residents Christmas morning. The up to 5 feet made travel extremely difficult and December 2004 winter storm is one residents in the Ohio shut down interstates in parts of the Ohio River Valley will not soon forget! Valley: I-64 (3 days) and I-65 (12 hours). • Areas of 1-1.5 inches of ice from Bowling Green to Bardstown caused power outages and tree/structural roof damage.
    [Show full text]
  • Patriot Hills of Dallas
    Patriot Hills of Dallas Background: After years of planning and market research our team assembled over 200+ - acres of prime Dallas property that was comprised of 8 separate properties. There is no record of any construction every being built on any of the 200 acres other than a homestead cabin. Much of the property was part of a family ranch used for grazing which is now overgrown with cedar and other species of trees and native grasses. Location: View property in the Dallas metroplex is one of the most unique features unmatched in the entire Dallas Fort Worth area. Most of the property is on a high bluff 100 feet above the surrounding area overlooking the Dallas Baptist University and the skyline of Fort Worth 21+ miles to the west. Convenient access to the greater Fort Worth and Dallas area by Interstate 20 and Interstate 30 Via Spur 408 freeways, Interstate 35, freeway 74, and the property is currently served by DART bus stops which provide connections to other mass transit options. The property is located 2 miles north of freeway 20 on the Spur 408 freeway and W. Kiest Blvd within the Dallas city limits. The property fronts on the East side of the Spur 408 freeway from Kiest Blvd exit on the North and runs continuous to the South to Merrifield Rd exit. The City of Dallas has plans to extend this road straight east to connect to West Ledbetter Drive that will take you directly to the Dallas Executive Airport and connecting on east with Freeway 67, Interstate 35 and Interstate 45.
    [Show full text]
  • Gregor Weichbrodt on the Road 0X0a
    0x0a On the Road Gregor Weichbrodt On the Road Gregor Weichbrodt 0x0a © 2014 Gregor Weichbrodt All rights reserved. www.ggor.de CONTENTS About this book ........................ 5 Chapter 1 ............................... 7 Chapter 2 .............................. 23 Chapter 3 .............................. 41 Chapter 4 .............................. 53 ABOUT THIS BOOK Based on the novel “On the Road” by Jack Kerouac and Google Maps Direction Service. The exact and approximate spots Kerouac traveled and described are taken from the book and parsed by Google Direction Service API. The chapters match those of the original book. Gregor Weichbrodt January 2014 www.ggor.de 7 CHAPTER 1 Head northwest on W 47th St toward 7th Ave. Take the 1st left onto 7th Ave. Turn right onto W 39th St. Take the ramp onto Lincoln Tunnel. Parts of this road are closed Mon–Fri 4:00 – 7:00 pm. Entering New Jersey. Continue onto NJ-495 W. Keep right to continue on NJ-3 W, follow signs for New Jersey 3 W/Garden State Parkway/Secaucus. Take the New Jersey 3 W exit on the left toward Clifton. Merge onto NJ-3 W. Slight right onto the Garden State Pkwy N ramp. Merge onto Garden State Pkwy. Take exit 155P on the left to merge onto NJ-19 N toward I-80/ Paterson. Turn left onto Cianci St. Turn right onto Market St. Head west on Market St toward Washington St. Turn left onto Main St. Turn right onto County Rd 509 S. Take the Interstate 80 E ramp. Merge onto I-80 E. Take exit 62A-62B toward Saddle 9 Brook/Saddle River Rd/Garden State Pkwy.
    [Show full text]
  • What to See Where to Stay Where to Eat
    2010 EDition GREA t E R B A t O N R O u GE The Official Visitors Guide PluS is here! What to see Where to stay Where to eat SPONSORED BY: TheMusic Issue Date: Welcome Ad proof #4 • Please respond by e-mail or fax with your approval or minor revisions. • Ad will run as is unless approval or final revisions are received by the close of business today. • Additional revisions must be requested and may be subject to production fees. Carefully check this ad for: CORRECT ADDRESS • CORRECT PHONE NUMBER • ANY TYPOS This ad design © Louisiana Business, Inc. 2009. All rights reserved. Phone 225-928-1700 • Fax 225-926-1329 d o fo a Se & Steak Family owned and operated Fireside dining Can accommodate large parties including rehearsal dinners Fresh homemade yeast rolls will greet you at your table US Highway 190, Livonia, LA 70755 | 225-637-3663 | notyourmamas.net (just 20 minutes west of Baton Rouge and 40 minutes east of Lafayette) Open daily 11-9pm • Fri. and Sat. 11-10pm 3 WELCOME • www.visitbatonrouge.com Issue Date: Welcome Ad proof #2 • Please respond by e-mail or fax with your approval or minor revisions. • Ad will run as is unless approval or final revisions are received by the close of business today. • Additional revisions must be requested and may be subject to production fees. Carefully check this ad for: CORRECT ADDRESS • CORRECT PHONE NUMBER • ANY TYPOS This ad design © Louisiana Business, Inc. 2009. All rights reserved. Phone 225-928-1700 • Fax 225-926-1329 VISIT US AT WWW.HOOTERSLA.COM TO FIND A LOCATION NEAR YOU Hooters Siegen Lane 6454 Siegen Lane Baton Rouge, LA 70809 225-293-1900 Hooters College Drive 5120 Corporate Blvd.
    [Show full text]
  • Nelson County Comprehensive Plan
    Nelson County Comprehensive Plan As Approved by the Nelson County Board of Supervisors and Nelson County Planning Commission Adopted _______, 2012 Prepared by The Nelson County Planning Commission with the assistance of The Citizens of Nelson County at the request of The Nelson County Board of Supervisors Staff support from the Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission Design Resources Center, University of Virginia Nelson County Department of Planning Nelson County Comprehensive Plan Table of Contents Executive Summary i Chapter One-Portrait of Nelson County 1 A Brief History of Nelson County 1 Nelson County Today 2 Chapter Two-Purpose of the Plan 4 Chapter Three-Goals and Principles 5 Economic Development 5 Transportation 7 Education 8 Public and Human Services 9 Natural, Scenic, and Historic Resources 10 Recreation 11 Development Areas 13 Rural Conservation 14 Chapter Four-Land Use Plan 16 Introduction 16 Land Use Planning Data 17 Existing Land Use 17 Areas Served by Water and/or Sewer 19 Environmental Constraints: Steep Slopes, Soil Potential for Agricultural Use 21 Land Use Plan for Designated Development Areas 25 Rural Small Town Development Model 26 Rural Village Development Model 28 Neighborhood Mixed Use Development Model 30 Mixed Commercial Development Model 32 Light Industrial Development Model 34 Land Use Plan for Rural Conservation Areas 36 Future Land Use Plan and Map 38 Chapter Five – Transportation Plan 41 Introduction 41 Purpose 41 Background 42 Existing Plans and Studies 42 Existing Roadway Inventory 48 Interstate
    [Show full text]
  • National Infrastructure Simulation and Analysis Center
    This page intentionally left blank. National Infrastructure Simulation and Analysis Center Risk Development and Modeling Branch Homeland Infrastructure Threat and Risk Analysis Center Office of Infrastructure Protection In Collaboration with The National Incident Management Systems and Advanced Technologies Institute at The University of Louisiana at Lafayette Louisiana Highway 1/Port Fourchon Study July 15, 2011 i This page intentionally left blank. ii Executive Summary Port Fourchon is located at the southern tip of Lafourche Parish, Louisiana, along the coast of the Gulf of Mexico. The port is the southernmost port in Louisiana and centrally located in a large area of the Gulf that is rich in oil and natural gas drilling fields. Shallow water operations are serviced out of many ports along the Gulf Coast, but servicing for deepwater operations is located at select ports due to the use of larger vessels that are required to support deepwater operations. Due to its central location, deep channels, favorable weather conditions, and size, the oil and gas industry has chosen to concentrate its infrastructure for deepwater oil and gas operations support at Port Fourchon. Roughly 270 large supply vessels traverse the channels of Port Fourchon each day. Normally, about 75 percent of these vessels are servicing drilling rigs. Even though there are many more production platforms that require servicing than there are operating drilling rigs, drilling operations require much more material than production requires. The supplies and materials sent to rigs and platforms from Port Fourchon are brought into the port by the 600 eighteen-wheel trucks that travel on Louisiana Highway 1 (LA-1) each day.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Worth Arlington
    RealReal EstateEstate MarketMarket OverviewOverview FortFort Worth-ArlingtonWorth-Arlington Jennifer S. Cowley Assistant Research Scientist Texas A&M University July 2001 © 2001, Real Estate Center. All rights reserved. RealReal EstateEstate MarketMarket OverviewOverview FortFort Worth-ArlingtonWorth-Arlington Contents 2 Population 6 Employment 9 Job Market 10 Major Industries 11 Business Climate 13 Education 14 Transportation and Infrastructure Issues 15 Public Facilities 16 Urban Growth Patterns Map 1. Growth Areas 17 Housing 20 Multifamily 22 Manufactured Housing Seniors Housing 23 Retail Market 24 Map 2. Retail Building Permits 26 Office Market 28 Map 3. Office and Industrial Building Permits 29 Industrial Market 31 Conclusion RealReal EstateEstate MarketMarket OverviewOverview FortFort Worth-ArlingtonWorth-Arlington Jennifer S. Cowley Assistant Research Scientist Haslet Southlake Keller Grapevine Interstate 35W Azle Colleyville N Richland Hills Loop 820 Hurst-Euless-Bedford Lake Worth Interstate 30 White Settlement Fort Worth Arlington Interstate 20 Benbrook Area Cities Counties Arlington Haltom City Hood Bedford Hurst Johnson Benbrook Keller Parker Burleson Mansfield Tarrant Cleburne North Richland Hills Land Area of Fort Worth- Colleyville Saginaw Euless Southlake Arlington MSA Forest Hill Watauga 2,945 square miles Fort Worth Weatherford Grapevine White Settlement Population Density (2000) 578 people per square mile he Fort Worth-Arlington Metro- cane Harbor and The Ballpark at square-foot rodeo arena, and to the politan Statistical
    [Show full text]
  • Arkansas Embarks on Its Largest Highway Construction Program
    Connecting Arkansas Program Arkansas embarks on its largest highway construction program CAP Locations CA0905 CA0903 CA0904 CA0902 CA1003 CA0901 CA0909 CA1002 CA0907 CA1101 CA0906 CA0401 CA0801 CA0803 CA1001 CA0103 CA0501 CA0101 CA0603 CA0605 CA0606/061377 CA0604 CA0602 CA0607 CA0608 CA0601 CA0704 CA0703 CA0701 CA0705 CA0702 CA0706 CAP Project CA0201 CA0202 CA0708 0 12.5 25 37.5 50 Miles The Connecting Arkansas Program (CAP) is the largest highway construction program ever undertaken by the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department (AHTD). Through a voter-approved constitutional amendment, the people of Arkansas passed a 10-year, half-cent sales tax to improve highway and infrastructure projects throughout the state. Job Job Name Route County Improvements CA0101 County Road 375 – Highway 147 Highway 64 Crittenden Widening CA0103 Cross County Line - County Road 375 Highway 64 Crittenden Widening CA0201 Louisiana State Line – Highway 82 Highway 425 Ashley Widening CA0202 Highway 425 – Hamburg Highway 82 Ashley Widening CA0401 Highway 71B – Highway 412 Interstate 49 Washington Widening CA0501 Turner Road – County Road 5 Highway 64 White Widening CA0601 Highway 70 – Sevier Street Interstate 30 Saline Widening CA0602 Interstate 530 – Highway 67 Interstates 30/40 Pulaski Widening and Reconstruction CA0603 Highway 365 – Interstate 430 Interstate 40 Pulaski Widening CA0604 Main Street – Vandenberg Boulevard Highway 67 Pulaski Widening CA0605 Vandenberg Boulevard – Highway 5 Highway 67 Pulaski/Lonoke Widening CA0606 Hot Springs – Highway
    [Show full text]