Towards the Synthesis of Aromatic Analogues of Himbacine, Potential Muscarinic Ligands
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
TOWARDS THE SYNTHESIS OF AROMATIC ANALOGUES OF HIMBACINE, POTENTIAL MUSCARINIC LIGANDS A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Xue Qin Shi (B.E., M.Sc.) Supervisor: Associate Professor Roger W. Read SCHOOL OF CHEMISTRY THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES MAY2000 CERTIFICATE OF ORIGNALITY I hereby declare thatthis submission is my own workand that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, it contains no material previously published or written by another person nor material which to a substantial extent has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma of a university or other institute of higher learning, except where due acknowledgementis made in thetext . CERTIFICATEOF ORIGINALITY I hereby declare that this submission is my own worlc and to the best of my knowledge it contains no materials previously published or written by another person, nor material which to a substantial extent bas been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma at UNSW or any other educational institution, except where due acknowledgement is made in the thesis. AJJ.y contnbution made to the research by others, with whom I have worlced at UNSW or elsewhere. is explicitly acknowledged in the thesis. I also declare that the intellectual content of this thesis is the product of my own work, except to the extent that assistance from others in the project's design and conception or in style, presentation and linguistic expression is acknowledged. 11 ACKNOLEDGEMENTS I am very grateful to my supervisor Associate Professor Roger W. Read for his guidance, enthusiasm, encouragement and patience throughout the course of this study. I also extend my thanks to my co-supervisor Prof. David StC. Black for his supervision while Roger was away on a Special Studies Program. I am thankful to all technical staff in the School of Chemistry, especially to Dr. Graha.111 Ball, Mrs. Hilda Stender and Dr. Jim Hook for their assistance in the 2-D n.m.r. experiments; to Dr. Joe Brophy and Mr. Rui Zhang for their useful help with the routine and high resolution mass spectra experiments. I would like to thank the members of the Read group for their friendship and enjoyable discussions on many subjects. It is also grateful to Dr. Neil Donoghue for his kindly proof reading part of this thesis. I am also grateful to the Department of Employment, Education, Training and Youth affairs for the Australian Postgraduate Award (APA). Last, but by no means least, I am deeply grateful to my family, my husband Jiyuan and my lovely son Tian, for their love, constant understanding, continued support and patience during my study. ill ABSTRACT This thesis describes the development of a synthetic approach to aromatic analogues of himbacine, a potent muscarinc antagonist that is of interest to the study of age-related disease. The studies have focused on strategies towards the lower (or southern) portion of the molecule and methods that involve the Michael reaction to assemble the carbon framework. An improved procedure for preparation of (+)-5-methyl-2(5H)-furanone as a Michael acceptor has been achieved in 51 % overall yield. Various methods of synthesis were investigated towards 2-(2-bromomethylphenyl)acetaldehyde as a Michael donor. The molecule was finally synthesised from isochroman through hydrogen bromide cleavage and oxidation but it was unstable and not suitable as an intermediate. An alternative Michael donor, 2-(2-methoxymethylphenyl)acetaldehyde N,N-dimethylhydrazone was eventually prepared and proved to be a more stable partner,, _j,,.- __ tMvirn dJ-r1 .-.d..,fwr11 f .,-, y/;,7 ~ and suitable intermediate for reaction. Conjugate additionnof' hydrazoner~Jtvith unsaturated ester was studied in model systems and the reaction applied to the above hydrazone and unsaturated lactone partner. A number of advanced intermediates with modified substituents were prepared but all proved difficult and did not undergo the ring closure desired for completion of the synthesis. During the study, the stereochemical outcome of the Michael reaction was determined by spectroscopic methods including the analysis of unexpected products derived from alternative cyclisations. An unusual conformational exchange process was also discovered through n.m.r. analysis of one of the intermediates. This work will provide a base on which future synthetic studies will be developed. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS CERTIFICATE OF ORIGINALITY ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 11 ABSTRACT 111 TABLE OF CONTENTS iv CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Muscarinic Receptor~M 2 Muscarinic Antagonists I 1.3 Alkaloid: Himbacine 4 6 1.4 Structure-Activity Relationships (SAR) 7 1.5 Structural Variants of Himbacine 11 1.6 Approaches to the Total Synthesis of Himbacine 4 Alkaloids 15 1. 7 Aim of the Study 22 CHAPTER 2. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 23 2.1 Design ofHimbacine Analogue(s) 23 2.2 The Synthesis Plan 24 2.3 Preparation of Michael Acceptor, (+)-5-methyl-2(5H)-furanone 30 25 2.4 Preparation of Michael Donors 30 2.4.1 Attempted preparation of 2-(2-bromomethylphenyl)ethanol 79 31 Oxidation ofindene 78 31 via Claisen rearrangement ofally/ ether 101 35 2.4.2 Preparation of 2-(bromomethylphenyl)acetaldehyde 77 43 V 2.4.3 Preparation of 2-(2-methoxymethylphenyl)acetaldehyde N,N dimethylhydrazone 117 47 2.4.4 Preparation of 2-(2-phenoxymethylphenyl)acetaldehyde 120 and its hydrazone 121 49 2.5 Michael Reactions 52 2.5.1 Reactions of enamine 131 with lactone 30 54 2.5.2 Reactions ofhydrazone derivatives 56 2.5.3 Reactions of arylmethyl bromide 141 with methyl crotonate/lactone 30 65 2.6 Preparation of Advanced Intermediates 70 2.6.1 Preparation of aldehyde 148 through solvolysis of hydrazone 139 70 2.6.2 Preparation of acetal 149 76 2.6.3 Preparation of sulfide 153 80 2.6.4 Reactions of compounds 137 and 138 with hydrogen bromide 83 2.6.5 Preparation of aldehyde 158 90 2.7 Ring Closure 97 2.8 Summary and Future Directions 107 CHAPTER 3. EXPERIMENTAL 109 REFERENCES 173 CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background As the world population continues to grow and age, the problem of dementia will become even greater than it is today. 1 Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia disorder. AD, a devastating neurodegenerative disorder that is characterized by dramatic personality changes, and global cognitive decline currently affects 15 million people worldwide,2 taking more than 100 000 lives each year. 3 Symptoms of age-related diseases are consistent with degeneration of the basal forebrain cholinergic system, i.e. the neural networks in the cortical and hippocampal regions of the brain. In these regions, neurotransmissions are mediated by acetylcholine whose release is regulated by binding to inhibitory M2 muscarinic receptors. Clinical studies of Alzheimer's disease and other age-related illnesses have been restricted largely to subjects that are in advanced stages of dementia, but show that while levels of muscarinic receptors generally remain high elsewhere in the central nervous system 4 (CNS), presynaptic M2 muscarinic receptors in the basal forebrain are depleted. 1.2 Muscarinic Receptors and M2 Muscarinic Antagonists Muscarinic receptors are widely distributed in multiple organs and tissues and are critical to the maintenance of central and peripheral cholinergic neurotransmission.5 Molecular biological studies have demonstrated five distinct subtypes (ml-m5) of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChR) which share about 70% identity of amino acids in their seven trans-membrane segments.c,.io Each of these subtypes has been found to be localised in discrete areas of the brain or peripheral tissues. s-io Chapter 1 Introduction 2 Me' 1 pirenzepine 2 methoctramine 3 AF-DX 116 4 himbacine 5 4-DAMP 6 Chart 1. Compounds for characterization of muscarinic receptor subtypes M1-~ Muscarinic receptor subtypes have also been divided into four individual groups: M 1, M2, M 3 and M4, that have been characterized 11 by pharmacology using different antagonist affinities. For example, muscarinic M 1 receptors are characterised by a high affinity for pirenzepine 1 (Chart 1) and are found in high density in neuronal tissues and autonomic ganglia, 12 muscarinic M2 receptors have low affinity for pirenzepine 1 and high affinity for methoctramine 2, 13 AF-DX 116 3 14 and himbacine 4, 15 and are located mainly in cardiac tissue to modulate the release of acetylcholine, 16-21 whereas muscarinic Chapter 1 Introduction 3 M3 receptors display low affinity for pirenzepine 1 and high affinity for 4-DAMP 522 and p-fluorohexahydrosiladiphenidol 6,23 and are found in smooth muscles and glands. At present, no selective antagonist is available for the muscarinic M4 receptor subtype.24 Also, the other cloned receptor (m5) is not well characterized owing to a lack of selective ligands. 25 There is some correspondence between the two subtype classifications, but the pharmacologically defined subtypes generally represent combinations of the gene cloned receptor subtype proteins. Evidence has accumulated in recent years for the belief that selective muscarinic blockers might play an important role in the field of AD. For instance, it has been shown that M2 antagonists, such as AF-DX 116 3, enhance the release of acetylcholine in certain brain areas like cortex and hippocampus, both in vitro and in vivo. 26-28 This is due to a blockade of presynaptic receptors (marked as M2 sites in Figure 1) in the cortex and hippocampus receptors which enhances release of acetylcholine (Ach). The use of selective M2 antagonists could therefore be a new strategy to improve memory and learning. According to this concept, a potential therapeutic agent would have to possess good penetration through the blood brain barrier (BBB) and have a high selectivity for M2 versus M 1 receptors, since the drug should not counteract its presynaptic action by blocking postsynaptic M 1 receptors.