The Physical Mechanism of Osmosis and Osmotic Pressure

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Physical Mechanism of Osmosis and Osmotic Pressure The Physical Mechanism of Osmosis and Osmotic Pressure; A Hydrodynamic Theory for Calculating the Osmotic Reflection Coefficient by David Charles Guell B.S., Chemical Engineering Iowa State University (1985) S.M., Ciemnical Engineering Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1987) SUBMITTED TO TIfE DEPARTMENT OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHIIYIN CIIEMICAL ENGINEERING at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECIINOLOGY February 1991 ( 1991 Massachusetts Institute of Technology Signature of Author: --- - Department of Chemlical Engineering November 20, 1990 Certified by: HIoward Brenner Professor, Department of Chemical Engineering Thesis Supervisor Accepted by: NY~~ -- - William Deen Department of Chemica.l Engineering MASSACHUTS :STrl UTE Chairman, Collmmitteeon Graduate Students OFTECHIVfI nGY FEB 08 1991 UBAIES 1 The Physical Mechanism of Osmosis and Osmotic Pressure; A Hydrodynamic Theory for Calculating the Osmotic Reflection Coefficient by David Charles Cuell Submitted to the Department of Chemical Engineering on November 20, 1990 in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Chemical Engineering ABSTRACT The inicroscale, mechanical cause of osmosis and oslmotic pressure in membrane systems is not well understood, and no fully satisfactory mechanism has been of- fered to explain these phenomena. Presented here is a general theory demonstrating that the force the membrane exerts on the solute particles causes osmosis and osmotic pressure. At equilibrium, the greater force exerted by the membrane on the more con- centrated solution is balanced by the macroscopically observable pressure difference known as osmotic pressure. Under nonequilibrium conditions, the membrane-solute force is transmitted to the solvent which is thereby accelerated from rest. The result- ing convective flow of solvent is the macroscopic phenomenon of osmosis. While these ideas have been proposed previously, the general proof of this mechanism is novel. Beyond the academic interest in establishing a mechanical understanding of osmotic pressure, this work lays the foundation on which a general, quantitative theory of osmosis is constructed in Chapter 2 of this thesis. Osmosis in dilute solutions is usually quantified in terms of the osmotic reflection coefficient o-, relating small pressure and concentration differences across a membrane at zero total volume flow according to AP = aoRLTAc. Existing theories for comput- ing o rely upon implicitly averaged momentum transport equations on the length scale of the membrane pores (on which scale the individual solute particles can also be resolved) as well as upon thermodynamic concepts and equations which are not ap- plicable on such scales. The work presented provides a general theory for computing ao which does not appeal to thermodynamic or pre-averaged hydrodynamic equa- tions. Instead, the theory combines 'instantaneous' microscalemomentum-transport equations with recent approaches for modelling the hlydrodynamniceffects arising from Brownian particles. Computing the long-time average behavior of these equations al- lows macroscopically observable quantities such as ao, to be calculated. The theory applies for membranes consisting of uniform pores of arbitrary cross-sectional shape and solute particles possessing any geometry. Qualitative structure property rela- tionships and general bounding results are also derived. Finally, important insights 2 into previous theories are obtained, thereby illuminating the physicochemical hydro- dynamics underlying those approaches. Thesis Advisor: Howard Brenner Professor, Department of Chemical Engineering 3 Acknowledgements I wish to thank Dr. Howard Brenner for his wisdom and guidance during the course of this research. These qualities and many others have permitted me to enjoy the best experience that MIT has to offer. The philosophy he has imparted and the independence he has granted have combined to enable me to achieve goals far greater than my modest abilities would have otherwise allowed. Reflecting on my study with Dr. Brenner, I find that I have learned from him by a subtle (and in retrospect, surprising) process occuring against an existing natural resistance, a process one might accurately describe as "osmotic". I also wish to thank the members of my thesis advisory committee, Dr. William Deen, Dr. T. Alan Hatton, and Dr. Ali Nadimn. Without their guidance and sug- gestions, this research would not have been as successful and satisfying, and I am grateful to have had their input. I also offer thanks to all office mates who have provided feedback on various issues arising during this research. Daily access to such sharp minds has been a valuable resource. Gretchen Mavrovouniotis and Ludwig and Johannes Nitsche deserve special recognition in this regard. I want to thank Bob and Margaret, whose love and esteem have long been a great source of comfort. I also thank Mom and Dad for the support, guidance, encouragement and love which have enabled me to forge the abilities by which I have attained a few, humble accomplishments. Of course, receiving a slide rule for my 4 ninth birthday didn't hurt either Finally, I offer my heart-felt gratitude to mnywife Karen. Her support, acceptance, companionship and love have made the last seven years what I had always hoped life would be. I am fortunate to have married such a wonderful woman. This research was supported, in part, by a National Science Foundation Graduate Fellowship. 5 Contents 1 The Physical Mechanism of Osmosis and Osmotic Pressure 12 1.1 Introdluction . ....... .12 1.2 Literature Review ........... ....... ..13 1.3 The Theory of Osmotic Phenomena . ....... ..25 1.3.1 Introduction. ....... ..25 1.3.2 Foundation of the Theory . ....... ..28 1.3.3 Analysis of Osmotic Pressure ....... ..30 1.4 Discussion ............... ....... .52 1.5 Conclusion. .............. .59 2 A Hydrodynamic Theory for Calculating the Osmotic Reflection Co- efficient 61 2.1 Introduction . ....... ... .61 2.2 Literature Review ........... ...... .. .63 2.3 Motivating Analysis .......... .......... ..71 2.4 A Hydrodynamic Theory of Osmosis . 79 2.4.1 General Equations .......... .. 81 6 2.4.2 Membranes Consisting of Long Uniform Pores . .... 87 2.4.3 Short Range Interaction Potentials ......... ... 100 2.4.4 Implicit Assumptions of the Theory ......... ... 102 2.5 Results. ............................ ... 106 2.5.1 Slit Pores ....................... ... 106 2.5.2 Cylindrical Pores ................... ... 117 2.6 Conclusions .......................... ... 120 2.6.1 Bounds on o and Structure-Property Relationships ... 130 2.7 Summary ........................... ... 134 3 Supporting Calculations 135 3.1 Slit Pores ...... 136 3.1.1 Hydrodynamic Weight Function .......136 .......... 3.1.2 Spherical Solute Particles . 139.... .......... 3.1.3 Needles ............. .....142 .......... 3.1.4 Thin Axisymmnetric Particles .. .....149 .......... 3.2 Cylindrical Pores ............ ......156 .......... 3.2.1 Hydrodynamic Weight Function . 156 ... 3.2.2 Spherical Particles ....... ......159 .......... 3.2.3 Needles ............. 167 ... 3.3 Approximate Representations of the Solute Particle . 171 ... 3.4 Correspondence with the Theory of Anderson et al. ... 173 ... 3.5 Sensitivity to the Choice of Force Distribution Function 182 7 4 Computer Output and Source Code 189 8 List of Figures 1.1 Hypothetical osmotic pressure experiment. ............... 31 1.2 One piston osmotic pressure experiment ................. 44 2.1 Data of Durbin (diamonds), Schultz et al. (triangles) and Long & An- derson (squares). ............................. 67 2.2 A membrane showing the separate reservoir and pore regions. .... 73 2.3 A long, thin pore with uniform cross-section ............... 88 2.4 Pore cross-section showing contour traced out by particle locator point when the particle contacts the pores wall ................. 101 2.5 A slit pore with spherical and needle-like particles .......... 107 2.6 Theoretical curves for X for short range potentials .......... 113 2.7 Theoretical curves for O,, for hard potentials ............... 114 2.8 Comparison of theory with experimental data of Long & Anderson. 121 3.1 Four equivalent orientations for a needle in a slit pore. ........ 144 3.2 Cross-sectional view of spherical particle in contact with a cylindrical pore with A < 1/2. ............................. 160 9 3.3 Cross-sectional view of a spherical particle in contact with a cylindrical pore with A > 1/2 ............................ 165 3.4 Cross-sectional view of a needle in a cylindrical pore. ......... 168 10 List of Tables 2.1 Results assuming different force distributions. ............. 127 11 Chapter 1 The Physical Mechanism of Osmosis and Osmotic Pressure 1.1 Introduction Membranes are of major biological, physiological and industrial importance. They allow varied organisms to exchange waste products for food, physicians to administer drugs with great precision via transdermal delivery devices, and water to be purified simply and inexpensively. Osmotic phenomena remain worthy of study because "no physical phenomenon has any greater import in biology than does osmosis" [102] yet, "despite the fundamental significance for biological fluid transport, an understanding of osmosis at the molecular level has been lacking" [54]. In particular, the microscale, mechanical cause of osmotic pressure in equilibrium membrane systems is not well characterized
Recommended publications
  • Conceptual Understanding of Osmosis and Diffusion by Australian First-Year Biology Students
    International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 27(9), 17-33, 2019 Conceptual Understanding of Osmosis and Diffusion by Australian First-year Biology Students Nicole B. Reinkea, Mary Kynna and Ann L. Parkinsona Corresponding author: Nicole B. Reinke ([email protected]) aSchool of Health and Sport Sciences, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs QLD 4576, Australia Keywords: biology, osmosis, diffusion, conceptual assessment, misconception Abstract Osmosis and diffusion are essential foundation concepts for first-year biology students as they are a key to understanding much of the biology curriculum. However, mastering these concepts can be challenging due to their interdisciplinary and abstract nature. Even at their simplest level, osmosis and diffusion require the learner to imagine processes they cannot see. In addition, many students begin university with flawed beliefs about these two concepts which will impede learning in related areas. The aim of this study was to explore misconceptions around osmosis and diffusion held by first-year cell biology students at an Australian regional university. The 18- item Osmosis and Diffusion Conceptual Assessment was completed by 767 students. From the results, four key misconceptions were identified: approximately half of the participants believed dissolved substances will eventually settle out of a solution; approximately one quarter thought that water will always reach equal levels; one quarter believed that all things expand and contract with temperature; and nearly one third of students believed molecules only move with the addition of external force. Greater attention to identifying and rectifying common misconceptions when teaching first-year students will improve their conceptual understanding of these concepts and benefit their learning in subsequent science subjects.
    [Show full text]
  • Circle Reverse Osmosis System
    CIRCLE REVERSE OSMOSIS SYSTEM KEY FEATURES Water Saving Technology – Patented technology eliminates backpressure The RC100 conforms to common in conventional RO systems making the Circle up to 10 times more NSF/ANSI 42, 53 and efficient than existing products. 58 for the reduction of Saves You Money – Conventional RO systems waste up to 24 gallons of Aesthetic Chlorine, Taste water per every 1 gallon of filtered water produced. The Circle only wastes and Odor, Cyst, VOCs, an average of 2.1 gallons of water per 1 gallon of filtered water produced, Fluoride, Pentavalent Arsenic, Barium, Radium 226/228, Cadmium, Hexavalent saving you water and money over the life of the product!. Chromium, Trivalent Chromium, Lead, RO Filter Auto Flushing – Significantly extends life of RO filter. Copper, Selenium and TDS as verified Chrome Faucet Included – With integrated LED filter change indicator. and substantiated by test data. The RC100 conforms to NSF/ANSI 372 for Space Saving Compact Design – Integrated rapid refill tank means more low lead compliance. space under the sink. SPECIFICATIONS Product Name H2O+ Circle Reverse Osmosis Water Filtration System Model / SKU RC100 Installation Undercounter Sediment Filter, Pre-Carbon Plus Filter, Post Carbon Block Filter (RF-20): 6 months Filters & Lifespan RO Membrane Filter (RF-40): 24 months Tank Capacity 6 Liters (refills fully in less than one hour) Dimensions 9.25” (W) x 16.5” (H) x 13.75” (D) Net weight 14.6 lbs Min/Max Operating Pressure 40 psi – 120 psi (275Kpa – 827Kpa) Min/Max Water Feed Temp 41º F – 95º F (5º C – 35º C) Faucet Flow Rate 0.26 – 0.37 gallons per minute (gpm) at incoming water pressure of 20–100 psi Rated Service Flow 0.07 gallons per minute (gpm) Warranty One Year Warranty PO Box 470085, San Francisco CA, 94147–0085 brondell.com 888-542-3355.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Formula That Replaces Van't Hoff Osmotic Pressure Equation
    New Osmosis Law and Theory: the New Formula that Replaces van’t Hoff Osmotic Pressure Equation Hung-Chung Huang, Rongqing Xie* Department of Neurosciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX *Chemistry Department, Zhengzhou Normal College, University of Zhengzhou City in Henan Province Cheng Beiqu excellence Street, Zip code: 450044 E-mail: [email protected] (for English communication) or [email protected] (for Chinese communication) Preamble van't Hoff, a world-renowned scientist, studied and worked on the osmotic pressure and chemical dynamics research to win the first Nobel Prize in Chemistry. For more than a century, his osmotic pressure formula has been written in the physical chemistry textbooks around the world and has been generally considered to be "impeccable" classical theory. But after years of research authors found that van’t Hoff osmotic pressure formula cannot correctly and perfectly explain the osmosis process. Because of this, the authors abstract a new concept for the osmotic force and osmotic law, and theoretically derived an equation of a curve to describe the osmotic pressure formula. The data curve from this formula is consistent with and matches the empirical figure plotted linearly based on large amounts of experimental values. This new formula (equation for a curved relationship) can overcome the drawback and incompleteness of the traditional osmotic pressure formula that can only describe a straight-line relationship. 1 Abstract This article derived a new abstract concept from the osmotic process and concluded it via "osmotic force" with a new law -- "osmotic law". The "osmotic law" describes that, in an osmotic system, osmolyte moves osmotically from the side with higher "osmotic force" to the side with lower "osmotic force".
    [Show full text]
  • Osmosis and Osmoregulation Robert Alpern, M.D
    Osmosis and Osmoregulation Robert Alpern, M.D. Southwestern Medical School Water Transport Across Semipermeable Membranes • In a dilute solution, ∆ Τ∆ Jv = Lp ( P - R CS ) • Jv - volume or water flux • Lp - hydraulic conductivity or permeability • ∆P - hydrostatic pressure gradient • R - gas constant • T - absolute temperature (Kelvin) • ∆Cs - solute concentration gradient Osmotic Pressure • If Jv = 0, then ∆ ∆ P = RT Cs van’t Hoff equation ∆Π ∆ = RT Cs Osmotic pressure • ∆Π is not a pressure, but is an expression of a difference in water concentration across a membrane. Osmolality ∆Π Σ ∆ • = RT Cs • Osmolarity - solute particles/liter of water • Osmolality - solute particles/kg of water Σ Osmolality = asCs • Colligative property Pathways for Water Movement • Solubility-diffusion across lipid bilayers • Water pores or channels Concept of Effective Osmoles • Effective osmoles pull water. • Ineffective osmoles are membrane permeant, and do not pull water • Reflection coefficient (σ) - an index of the effectiveness of a solute in generating an osmotic driving force. ∆Π Σ σ ∆ = RT s Cs • Tonicity - the concentration of effective solutes; the ability of a solution to pull water across a biologic membrane. • Example: Ethanol can accumulate in body fluids at sufficiently high concentrations to increase osmolality by 1/3, but it does not cause water movement. Components of Extracellular Fluid Osmolality • The composition of the extracellular fluid is assessed by measuring plasma or serum composition. • Plasma osmolality ~ 290 mOsm/l Na salts 2 x 140 mOsm/l Glucose 5 mOsm/l Urea 5 mOsm/l • Therefore, clinically, physicians frequently refer to the plasma (or serum) Na concentration as an index of extracellular fluid osmolality and tonicity.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary a Plant Is an Integrated System Which: 1
    Summary A plant is an integrated system which: 1. Obtains water and nutrients from the soil. 2. Transports them 3. Combines the H2O with CO2 to make sugar. 4. Exports sugar to where it’s needed Today, we’ll start to go over how this occurs Transport in Plants – Outline I.I. PlantPlant waterwater needsneeds II.II. TransportTransport ofof waterwater andand mineralsminerals A.A. FromFrom SoilSoil intointo RootsRoots B.B. FromFrom RootsRoots toto leavesleaves C.C. StomataStomata andand transpirationtranspiration WhyWhy dodo plantsplants needneed soso muchmuch water?water? TheThe importanceimportance ofof waterwater potential,potential, pressure,pressure, solutessolutes andand osmosisosmosis inin movingmoving water…water… Transport in Plants 1.1. AnimalsAnimals havehave circulatorycirculatory systems.systems. 2.2. VascularVascular plantsplants havehave oneone wayway systems.systems. Transport in Plants •• OneOne wayway systems:systems: plantsplants needneed aa lotlot moremore waterwater thanthan samesame sizedsized animals.animals. •• AA sunflowersunflower plantplant “drinks”“drinks” andand “perspires”“perspires” 1717 timestimes asas muchmuch asas aa human,human, perper unitunit ofof mass.mass. Transport of water and minerals in Plants WaterWater isis goodgood forfor plants:plants: 1.1. UsedUsed withwith CO2CO2 inin photosynthesisphotosynthesis toto makemake “food”.“food”. 2.2. TheThe “blood”“blood” ofof plantsplants –– circulationcirculation (used(used toto movemove stuffstuff around).around). 3.3. EvaporativeEvaporative coolingcooling.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is the Difference Between Osmosis and Diffusion?
    What is the difference between osmosis and diffusion? Students are often asked to explain the similarities and differences between osmosis and diffusion or to compare and contrast the two forms of transport. To answer the question, you need to know the definitions of osmosis and diffusion and really understand what they mean. Osmosis And Diffusion Definitions Osmosis: Osmosis is the movement of solvent particles across a semipermeable membrane from a dilute solution into a concentrated solution. The solvent moves to dilute the concentrated solution and equalize the concentration on both sides of the membrane. Diffusion: Diffusion is the movement of particles from an area of higher concentration to lower concentration. The overall effect is to equalize concentration throughout the medium. Osmosis And Diffusion Examples Examples of Osmosis: Examples of osmosis include red blood cells swelling up when exposed to fresh water and plant root hairs taking up water. To see an easy demonstration of osmosis, soak gummy candies in water. The gel of the candies acts as a semipermeable membrane. Examples of Diffusion: Examples of diffusion include perfume filling a whole room and the movement of small molecules across a cell membrane. One of the simplest demonstrations of diffusion is adding a drop of food coloring to water. Although other transport processes do occur, diffusion is the key player. Osmosis And Diffusion Similarities Osmosis and diffusion are related processes that display similarities. Both osmosis and diffusion equalize the concentration of two solutions. Both diffusion and osmosis are passive transport processes, which means they do not require any input of extra energy to occur.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Osmosis
    DIFFUSION & OSMOSIS EXPLORE LAB SCIENCE WHAT IS DIFFUSION? Diffusion is the net movement of molecules from areas of high concentration to areas of low concentration of that molecule. This random movement, or Brownian motion, is the result of collisions with other molecules in the medium. To see diffusion in action, put a drop of food coloring into a glass of water and see how it behaves. GRADIENTS The movement of particles from high to low concentration is called “moving down the concentration gradient.” Low concentration High concentration EQUILIBRIUM Molecules will continue to diffuse like this until they reach equilibrium, or until there are equal concentrations of that molecule throughout the whole medium. This is why the food coloring particles disperse until the water is the same color all the way through. OSMOSIS Osmosis is a specialized type of diffusion that describes the movement of water molecules. Osmosis occurs when you have membrane with unequal concentrations of water molecules on either side. Water molecules will diffuse across the membrane until equilibrium is reached. SEMIPERMEABLE MEMBRANES When you made your naked eggs, you removed their shell. Now they are surrounded by a semipermeable membrane. What is let across the membrane is determined by the size, shape, or charge of the molecule and the characteristics of the membrane’s pores. The egg membrane is only permeable water in your experiments, so all the changes you see are because of the movement of water across the membrane. NAKED EGG EXPERIMENT If you put your naked egg in But if you put your egg in water, you probably noticed corn syrup or salt water, it that it got bigger.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport of Water and Solutes in Plants
    Transport of Water and Solutes in Plants Water and Solute Potential Water potential is the measure of potential energy in water and drives the movement of water through plants. LEARNING OBJECTIVES Describe the water and solute potential in plants Key Points Plants use water potential to transport water to the leaves so that photosynthesis can take place. Water potential is a measure of the potential energy in water as well as the difference between the potential in a given water sample and pure water. Water potential is represented by the equation Ψsystem = Ψtotal = Ψs + Ψp + Ψg + Ψm. Water always moves from the system with a higher water potential to the system with a lower water potential. Solute potential (Ψs) decreases with increasing solute concentration; a decrease in Ψs causes a decrease in the total water potential. The internal water potential of a plant cell is more negative than pure water; this causes water to move from the soil into plant roots via osmosis.. Key Terms solute potential: (osmotic potential) pressure which needs to be applied to a solution to prevent the inward flow of water across a semipermeable membrane transpiration: the loss of water by evaporation in terrestrial plants, especially through the stomata; accompanied by a corresponding uptake from the roots water potential: the potential energy of water per unit volume; designated by ψ Water Potential Plants are phenomenal hydraulic engineers. Using only the basic laws of physics and the simple manipulation of potential energy, plants can move water to the top of a 116-meter-tall tree. Plants can also use hydraulics to generate enough force to split rocks and buckle sidewalks.
    [Show full text]
  • Engineering Aspects of Reverse Osmosis Module Design
    Lenntech [email protected] Tel. +31-152-610-900 www.lenntech.com Fax. +31-152-616-289 Engineering Aspects of Reverse Osmosis Module Design Authors: Jon Johnson +, Markus Busch ++ + Research Specialist, Research and Development, Dow Water & Process Solutions ++ Global Desalination Application Specialist, Dow Water & Process Solutions Email:[email protected] Abstract During the half century of development from a laboratory discovery to plants capable of producing up to half a million tons of desalinated seawater per day, Reverse Osmosis (RO) technology has undergone rapid transition. This transition process has caused signification transformation and consolidation in membrane chemistry, module design, and RO plant configuration and operation. From the early days, when cellulose acetate membranes were used in hollow fiber module configuration, technology has transitioned to thin film composite polyamide flat-sheet membranes in a spiral wound configuration. Early elements – about 4-inches in diameter during the early 70s – displayed flow rates approaching 250 L/h and sodium chloride rejection of about 98.5 percent. One of today’s 16-inch diameter elements is capable of delivering 15-30 times more permeate (4000-8000 L/h) with 5 to 8 times less salt passage (hence a rejection rate of 99.7 percent or higher). This paper focuses on the transition process in RO module configuration, and how it helped to achieve these performance improvements. An introduction is provided to the two main module configurations present in the early days, hollow fiber and spiral wound and the convergence to spiral wound designs is described as well. The development and current state of the art of the spiral wound element is then reviewed in more detail, focusing on membrane properties (briefly), membrane sheet placement (sheet length and quantity), the changes in materials used (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Osmosis and Diffusion
    Transport Mechanisms through Cell Membranes Passive vs. Active Transport Essential Questions 1. Define passive transport. (Related to Essential Skill 3-4) 2. Describe and give an example of diffusion. (Related to Essential Skill 3-4) 3. Compare and contrast diffusion and osmosis. (Related to Essential Skill 3-4) 4. Explain how facilitated diffusion differs from diffusion in general. Passive Transport . Movement of molecules through the cell membrane . Movement is from high to low concentrations . Does NOT require energy. 3 Types of Passive Transport: . Diffusion . Osmosis . Facilitated Diffusion 1. Diffusion . Movement of molecules from high concentration to low concentration. Why can you smell popcorn from another room? . Why does food coloring mix by itself? . How does oxygen get into your blood? Selectively Permeable = cell membrane will only allow some things through! . Large macromolecules and charged ions can NOT get through the lipid bi-layer!!! 2. Facilitated Diffusion . Diffusion with the help of “channel” proteins. - Usually because molecules are too big or have a charge and can not go through the membrane alone. 3. Osmosis . Osmosis is the Diffusion of WATER!!!!! . Water moves from areas with more water to areas with less water . Why do your fingers get wrinkles when you swim too long? . Have you ever put salt on a slug??? Solutions & Solutes . A solution is a liquid with another substance dissolved in it . Examples: salt water & sugar water . A solute is the “stuff” that is dissolved in a solution . Examples: salt & sugar Solute + Solvent = Solution . In osmosis we trace the movement of the water, not the solute Three Types of Osmosis .
    [Show full text]
  • Water Facts: Number 6 Reverse Osmosis Units
    ARIZONA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION The University of Arizona • College of Agriculture • Tucson, Arizona 85721 Water Facts: Number 6 Reverse osmosis units Reverse osmosis (RO) is an excellent way to remove certain unwanted contaminants from your drinking water. Reverse osmosis treatment of your water Written by: can reduce health risks from contaminants such as lead or nitrates. It also can ELAINE HASSINGER improve the taste and appearance of your water. Assistant in Extension The basic part of an RO unit is the semi-permeable membrane, made of either cellulose acetate or thin film composite material. The membrane is placed THOMAS A. DOERGE between two screens and wrapped around a tube much like a roll of paper Associate Soils Specialist towels. PAUL B. BAKER Normal household water pressure forces water through the membrane. Associate Specialist, Occasionally, a pump must be added to increase household water pressure and Entomology enhance membrane efficiency. The membrane rejects most of the dissolved substances in the water and allows only purified water to pass through. Purified water then enters a storage container and the rejected water goes down the drain as waste. For additional information on this title contact Elaine Hassinger: If the water quality problem in your home is inorganic contaminants, then [email protected], or your reverse osmosis is an excellent treatment method. Many RO units can remove local cooperative extension 90% or more of certain inorganic chemicals. office. These inorganic chemicals include: fluoride, sulfate, nitrate, total dissolved solids, iron, copper, lead, mercury, arsenic, cadmium, silver and zinc. Reverse osmosis can even remove some microbiological contaminants, including Giardia This information has been cysts.
    [Show full text]
  • BIOL 221 – Concepts of Botany Topic 12: Water Relations, Osmosis and Transpiration
    BIOL 221 – Concepts of Botany Topic 12: Water Relations, Osmosis and Transpiration: A. Water Relations Water plays a critical role in plants. Water is the universal solvent that allows biochemical reactions to occur in all organisms, but that is not the only importance in plants. Water moves from the roots to the shoots and to every cell in between. Water movements across membranes (osmosis) results in the development of turgor pressures (positive pressures) in plant cells. These turgor pressures are what keep the primary plant body upright on land and, when they are lost, the plant wilts (cells become flaccid). In addition, the turgor pressures in young developing plant cells is directly responsible for the expansion of these cells. Therefore, growth of the plant depends on the movement of water to growing regions like the apical meristems. In addition, water movements facilitate nutrient transfer (minerals) from the roots to the photosynthetic tissues. Water in the phloem keeps important photosynthate compounds in solution for transport from sources (photosynthetic leaves) to sinks (non-photosynthetic organs, rapidly growing regions). So obviously water is extremely important to the health of a plant. In today’s lab you will have a chance to investigate the importance of water uptake and movement at the cellular and whole plant levels. Enjoy! B. To Transpire or Not to Transpire… Water moves through the plant continuously due to severe differences in water potential between the soil, the plant and the atmosphere. The xylem vascular tissue takes advantage of the physical properties of water (surface tension, cohesion, adhesion) in order to move water from the roots to the shoot.
    [Show full text]