Chloroplast DNA Inversions and the Origin of the Grass Family (Poaceae) JEFF J

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Chloroplast DNA Inversions and the Origin of the Grass Family (Poaceae) JEFF J Proc. Natd. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 89, pp. 7722-7726, August 1992 Plant Biology Chloroplast DNA inversions and the origin of the grass family (Poaceae) JEFF J. DOYLE*, JERROLD I. DAVIS, ROBERT J. SORENG, DAVID GARVIN, AND MARNI J. ANDERSON L. H. Bailey Hortorium, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853 Communicated by David Dilcher, May 26, 1992 ABSTRACT The phylogenetic affinities ofthe grass family grasses and discuss the molecular and phylogenetic implica- (Poaceae) have long been debated. The chloroplast genomes of tions of their taxonomic distribution. at least some grasses have been known to possess three inver- sions relative to the typical gene arrangement found in most flowering plants. We have surveyed for the presence of these MATERIALS AND METHODS inversions in grasses and other monocots by polymerase chain DNA was isolated from small amounts of either fresh leaf reaction amplification with primers constructed from se- tissue or dried herbarium specimens by the method ofDoyle quences flanking the inversion end points. Amplification phe- and Doyle (13). Representatives ofeight ofthe nine monocot notypes diagnostic for the largest inversion (28 kilobase pairs) superorders ofDahlgren et al. (5) (all but Triuridiflorae) were were found in genera representing all grass subfamile, and in surveyed (Table 1). PCR (14) amplification primers were the nongrass families Restionaceae, Ecdeiocoleaceae, and Join- designed against evolutionarily conserved sequences (mostly villeaceae, but not in any other monocots-otably, Flagellar- tRNA genes) flanking the end points of regions involved in iaceae, Anarthriaceae, Cyperaceae, or Juncaceae. This finding each ofthe three grass inversions, using information from the is consistent with one of the two principal views of grass completely sequenced chloroplast genomes of Oryza sativa phylogeny in suggesting that Poaceae and Cyperaceae (sedges) (rice) (11), Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco) (15), and the liver- are not closest relatives. A second (-6 kilobases) inversion wort Marchantia polymorpha (16) (Fig. 1; Table 2). appears to occur in a subset of the families possessing the 28- Double-stranded PCR amplifications were carried out with kilobase inversion and links Joinvilleaceae and Poaceae, while a Hybrid thermal cycler (National Labnet, Woodbridge, NJ); the smallest inversion appears unique to grasses. These inver- standard conditions for reactions were 35 cycles (using the sions thus provide a nested set of phylogenetic characters, tube control option) of 940C for 15 sec (denaturation), indicating a hierarchy ofrelationships in the grasses and allies, 550C-620C for 1 min (primer annealing), and 720C for 2 min with Joinvilleaceae identified as the likely sister group to the (extension). One hundred microliter reaction mixtures used Poaceae. manufacturer-supplied (Promega) 1Ox reaction buffer (con- taining 15 mM MgCl2) and included deoxynucleotide triphos- The origin and phylogenetic affinities of the economically phates (1.25 mM each), primers (0.5 FM each), 2.5 units of important grass family (Poaceae) have long been controver- Taq polymerase (Promega), and 0.1-1.0 ug oftemplate DNA. sial, in part because the family is unique morphologically and Products were electrophoretically separated in 1.5% Tris anatomically. This controversy has been reflected in the borate/EDTA agarose gels and visualized by staining with diversity of taxonomic treatments suggested for the family ethidium bromide under ultraviolet light. Reactions with no and other putatively related groups. For example, the familiar DNA added to the mixture were run as controls. system of Cronquist (1), following one traditional view (2), Both double-stranded amplification products using the places the grasses in an order with the sedges (Cyperaceae), trnR-rpsl4 primer pair, and single-stranded secondary am- another grass-like group of monocots with minute, predom- plification products of that product using only the trnR inantly wind-pollinated flowers. An alternative view, also primer, were sequenced with the Pharmacia T7 sequencing with a long history (3, 4), is that grasses are most closely kit with modifications (17). The rpsl4 amplification primer related to other families, particularly those of a predomi- was used as the sequencing primer. nantly Southern Hemisphere group that includes Restion- aceae, Flagellariaceae, and relatives. The latter view is RESULTS supported by the recent analyses of Dahlgren et al. (5). However, relationships among the several families within No results are reported here for any taxon unless its DNA this group have not been resolved by morphological and was capable ofbeing amplified, as indicated by a "universal" anatomical data (5-7). primer set (trnJfW + rpsl4; see below). Several taxa, notably The =134-kilobase (kb) chloroplast genome of grasses some from which only herbarium material was available, did possesses three inversions relative to the chloroplast DNA not meet this criterion. For taxa with "amplifiable" DNA, an gene arrangement found in most other flowering plants, inversion was considered present if (i) a strong amplification including the small number ofnongrass monocots sampled to product was observed with a primer pair specific for at least date (8-12). The relative timing of two of the inversions is one ofthe two end points ofthat inversion, and (ii) no product known: the S6-kb inversion spans one end point ofthe 28-kb was observed with primers diagnostic for the uninverted inversion and thus must have originated at a later time (11); condition at that same end. the relative time of origin of the smallest inversion is un- Inversion 1(28 kb). The presence/absence ofthis inversion known, as it lies wholly within the 28-kb inversion and was surveyed primarily at the rpsl4 end of the inversion, by outside the 6-kb inversion (see Fig. 1). Here we report the amplification experiments using rpsl4 with either trnR or occurrence of two of the inversions in families other than trnG-GCC (Fig. 1; Table 2). The primer pair trnR + trnfM-r was used as further confirmation of the inversion in some The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge taxa. It proved difficult to obtain unambiguous results for the payment. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact. *To whom reprint requests should be addressed. 7722 Downloaded by guest on September 23, 2021 Plant Biology: Doyle et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89 (1992) 7723 Table 1. Distribution of inversions in monocots Inversion Inversion Taxon 1 2 3 Taxon 1 2 3 Liliiflorae Flagellariaceae Liliales: Orchidaceae Flagellaria indica 1, [2] 6, [7] 10, [11] Govenia capitata 1, [2] 6 10, [11] Joinvilleaceae Ariflorae Joinvillea ascendens 2, [1] 7, [6] 10, [11] Arales: Araceae 4, 5, [3] Spathicarpa sagittifolia 1, [2] 6, [7] 10, [11] Restionaceae Arales: Lemnaceae Chondropetalum andreaeanum 2, [1] 6, [7] 10, [11] Lemna minor 1 Rhodocoma giganteus 2, [1] 6, [7] Alismatiflorae Poaceae Alismatales: Alismataceae Bambusoideae Sagittaria sp. 1, [2] 10, [11] Bambusa vulgaris 2 11, [10] Bromeliiflorae Brachyelytrum erectum 2, [1] Bromeliales: Bromeliaceae Lithachne humilis 2, [1] 7, [6] 11, [10] Catopsis sp. 1, [2] 4, 5, [3] Typhales: Typhaceae Pharus latifolius 2, [1] 11, [10] Typha latifolia 1, [2] 10, [11] Streptochaeta angustifolia 2 11, [10] Zingiberiflorae Pooideae Zingiberales: Musaceae Poa pratensis 2, [1] Musa sp. 1, [2] 10, [11] Centothecoideae Zingiberales: Zingiberaceae Chasmanthium latifolium 2, [1] 7, [6] 11, [10] Hedychium coronarium 1, [2] Arundinoideae Commeliniflorae Arundo donax 2 7, [6] 11, [10] Commelinales Chionochloa rigida 2 11, [101 Commelinaceae Cortaderia selloana 2, [11 7, [61 11, [10] Commelinantia sp. 1, [2] 10, [11] Molinia litoralis 2, [11 Hadrodemas warszewiczianum 1, [2] 6, [7] 10, [11] Thysanolaena maxima 2, [1] 7, [6] 11, [10] Zebrina sp. 1, [2] 6, [7] 10, [11] Phragmites communis 2 11, [101 Xyridaceae Chloridoideae Xyris ambigua 3, [4, 5] 6, [7] 10, [11] Eragrostis sp. 2 7 11 Eriocaulaceae Panicoideae Eriocaulon sp. 1, [2] 6, [7] 10, [11] Oplismenus sp. 2, [1] 79 [6] 11, [10] Cyperales Cyclanthiflorae Juncaceae Cyclanthales: Cyclanthaceae 1, [2] Juncus balticus 3, [4, 5] 8, [9] 10, [11] Carludovica drudei 1, [2] 6, [7] 10, [11] Cyperaceae Areciflorae Carex debilis 3, [4, 5] 8, [9] 10, [11] Arecales: Arecaceae Cyperus papyrus 3, [4, 5] 6, [7] Bismarckia nobilis 1, [21 6 10 Poales Pandaniflorae Anarthriaceae Pandanales: Pandanaceae Anarthria scabra 3, [4, 5] 8, [9] 10, [11] Pandanus veitchii 1, [2] 6, [7] 10, [11] Ecdeiocoleaceae Ecdeiocolea monostachya 2, [1] 10, [11] 4, 5, [3] The presence ofan inversion is denoted by boldface type for an experimental result. Negative results are shown in brackets and are only given when confirming a positive result. Experimental results are primer pairs (see Table 2 and Fig. 1) numbered as follows: 1, trnG-GCC + rpsl4; 2, trnR + rpsl4; 3, trnR + trnG-UCC 3' exon; 4, trnJW + trnG-UCC 3' exon; 5, trnR + trnfW-r; 6, trnS + trnG-UCC 5' exon; 7, trnS + psbD; 8, trnT + psbD; 9, trnT + trnG-UCC 5' exon; 10, trnE + trnT-r; 11, trnE + trnT-r. tVoucher information is available on request. trnG-UCC end of the 28-kb inversion. Despite increasing subfamilies considered by various authors to be particularly stringency by raising annealing temperatures, faint amplifi- heterogeneous or basal within the family (19, 20) (Table 1). cation products often appeared in control reactions (e.g., PCR amplification phenotypes consistent with the presence faint products in grasses using the primer pair trnG-UCC 3' of the 28-kb inversion also were found in representatives of exon + trnR, or in dicot controls using trnG-UCC 3' exon + three nongrass families of the superorder Commeliniflorae, trnfM). Results of experiments at this end are therefore order Poales: the monogeneric families Joinvilleaceae and reported only for taxa in which no amplification was ob- Ecdeiocoleaceae and two genera of the large family Restion- served with either pair of primers at the rpsl4 end of the aceae (Table 1; Fig.
Recommended publications
  • Approved Plant List 10/04/12
    FLORIDA The best time to plant a tree is 20 years ago, the second best time to plant a tree is today. City of Sunrise Approved Plant List 10/04/12 Appendix A 10/4/12 APPROVED PLANT LIST FOR SINGLE FAMILY HOMES SG xx Slow Growing “xx” = minimum height in Small Mature tree height of less than 20 feet at time of planting feet OH Trees adjacent to overhead power lines Medium Mature tree height of between 21 – 40 feet U Trees within Utility Easements Large Mature tree height greater than 41 N Not acceptable for use as a replacement feet * Native Florida Species Varies Mature tree height depends on variety Mature size information based on Betrock’s Florida Landscape Plants Published 2001 GROUP “A” TREES Common Name Botanical Name Uses Mature Tree Size Avocado Persea Americana L Bahama Strongbark Bourreria orata * U, SG 6 S Bald Cypress Taxodium distichum * L Black Olive Shady Bucida buceras ‘Shady Lady’ L Lady Black Olive Bucida buceras L Brazil Beautyleaf Calophyllum brasiliense L Blolly Guapira discolor* M Bridalveil Tree Caesalpinia granadillo M Bulnesia Bulnesia arboria M Cinnecord Acacia choriophylla * U, SG 6 S Group ‘A’ Plant List for Single Family Homes Common Name Botanical Name Uses Mature Tree Size Citrus: Lemon, Citrus spp. OH S (except orange, Lime ect. Grapefruit) Citrus: Grapefruit Citrus paradisi M Trees Copperpod Peltophorum pterocarpum L Fiddlewood Citharexylum fruticosum * U, SG 8 S Floss Silk Tree Chorisia speciosa L Golden – Shower Cassia fistula L Green Buttonwood Conocarpus erectus * L Gumbo Limbo Bursera simaruba * L
    [Show full text]
  • The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts
    The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: A County Checklist • First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Somers Bruce Sorrie and Paul Connolly, Bryan Cullina, Melissa Dow Revision • First A County Checklist Plants of Massachusetts: Vascular The A County Checklist First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Massachusetts Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program The Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program (NHESP), part of the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, is one of the programs forming the Natural Heritage network. NHESP is responsible for the conservation and protection of hundreds of species that are not hunted, fished, trapped, or commercially harvested in the state. The Program's highest priority is protecting the 176 species of vertebrate and invertebrate animals and 259 species of native plants that are officially listed as Endangered, Threatened or of Special Concern in Massachusetts. Endangered species conservation in Massachusetts depends on you! A major source of funding for the protection of rare and endangered species comes from voluntary donations on state income tax forms. Contributions go to the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Fund, which provides a portion of the operating budget for the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program. NHESP protects rare species through biological inventory,
    [Show full text]
  • Mccaskill Alpine Garden, Lincoln College : a Collection of High
    McCaskill Alpine Garden Lincoln College A Collection of High Country Native Plants I/ .. ''11: :. I"" j'i, I Joy M. Talbot Pat V. Prendergast Special Publication No.27 Tussock Grasslands & Mountain Lands Institute. McCaskill Alpine Garden Lincoln College A Collection of High Country Native Plants Text: Joy M. Tai bot Illustration & Design: Pat V. Prendergast ISSN 0110-1781 ISBN O- 908584-21-0 Contents _paQ~ Introduction 2 Native Plants 4 Key to the Tussock Grasses 26 Tussock Grasses 27 Family and Genera Names 32 Glossary 34 Map 36 Index 37 References The following sources were consulted in the compilation of this manual. They are recommended for wider reading. Allan, H. H., 1961: Flora of New Zealand, Volume I. Government Printer, Wellington. Mark, A. F. & Adams, N. M., 1973: New Zealand Alpine Plants. A. H. & A. W. Reed, Wellington. Moore, L.B. & Edgar, E., 1970: Flora of New Zealand, Volume II. Government Printer, Wellington. Poole, A. L. & Adams, N. M., 1980: Trees and Shrubs of New Zealand. Government Printer, Wellington. Wilson, H., 1978: Wild Plants of Mount Cook National Park. Field Guide Publication. Acknowledgement Thanks are due to Dr P. A. Williams, Botany Division, DSIR, Lincoln for checking the text and offering co.nstructive criticism. June 1984 Introduction The garden, named after the founding Director of the Tussock Grasslands and Mountain Lands Institute::', is intended to be educational. From the early 1970s, a small garden plot provided a touch of character to the original Institute building, but it was in 1979 that planning began to really make headway. Land­ scape students at the College carried out design projects, ideas were selected and developed by Landscape architecture staff in the Department of Horticul­ ture, Landscape and Parks, and the College approved the proposals.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecosystem Profile Madagascar and Indian
    ECOSYSTEM PROFILE MADAGASCAR AND INDIAN OCEAN ISLANDS FINAL VERSION DECEMBER 2014 This version of the Ecosystem Profile, based on the draft approved by the Donor Council of CEPF was finalized in December 2014 to include clearer maps and correct minor errors in Chapter 12 and Annexes Page i Prepared by: Conservation International - Madagascar Under the supervision of: Pierre Carret (CEPF) With technical support from: Moore Center for Science and Oceans - Conservation International Missouri Botanical Garden And support from the Regional Advisory Committee Léon Rajaobelina, Conservation International - Madagascar Richard Hughes, WWF – Western Indian Ocean Edmond Roger, Université d‘Antananarivo, Département de Biologie et Ecologie Végétales Christopher Holmes, WCS – Wildlife Conservation Society Steve Goodman, Vahatra Will Turner, Moore Center for Science and Oceans, Conservation International Ali Mohamed Soilihi, Point focal du FEM, Comores Xavier Luc Duval, Point focal du FEM, Maurice Maurice Loustau-Lalanne, Point focal du FEM, Seychelles Edmée Ralalaharisoa, Point focal du FEM, Madagascar Vikash Tatayah, Mauritian Wildlife Foundation Nirmal Jivan Shah, Nature Seychelles Andry Ralamboson Andriamanga, Alliance Voahary Gasy Idaroussi Hamadi, CNDD- Comores Luc Gigord - Conservatoire botanique du Mascarin, Réunion Claude-Anne Gauthier, Muséum National d‘Histoire Naturelle, Paris Jean-Paul Gaudechoux, Commission de l‘Océan Indien Drafted by the Ecosystem Profiling Team: Pierre Carret (CEPF) Harison Rabarison, Nirhy Rabibisoa, Setra Andriamanaitra,
    [Show full text]
  • Missouriensis
    Missouriensis Journal of the Missouri Native Plant Society Volume 34 2017 effectively published online 30 September 2017 Missouriensis, Volume 34 (2017) Journal of the Missouri Native Plant Society EDITOR Douglas Ladd Missouri Botanical Garden P.O. Box 299 St. Louis, MO 63110 email: [email protected] MISSOURI NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY https://monativeplants.org PRESIDENT VICE-PRESIDENT John Oliver Dana Thomas 4861 Gatesbury Drive 1530 E. Farm Road 96 Saint Louis, MO 63128 Springfield, MO 65803 314.487.5924 317.430.6566 email: [email protected] email: [email protected] SECRETARY TREASURER Malissa Briggler Bob Siemer 102975 County Rd. 371 74 Conway Cove Drive New Bloomfield, MO 65043 Chesterfield, MO 63017 573.301.0082 636.537.2466 email: [email protected] email: [email protected] IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT WEBMASTER Paul McKenzie Brian Edmond 2311 Grandview Circle 8878 N Farm Road 75 Columbia, MO 65203 Walnut Grove, MO 65770 573.445.3019 417.742.9438 email: [email protected] email: [email protected] BOARD MEMBERS Steve Buback, St. Joseph (2015-2018); email: [email protected] Ron Colatskie, Festus (2016-2019); email: [email protected] Rick Grey, St. Louis (2015-2018); email: [email protected] Bruce Schuette, Troy (2016-2019); email: [email protected] Mike Skinner, Republic (2016-2019); email: [email protected] Justin Thomas, Springfield (2014-2017); email: [email protected] i FROM THE EDITOR Welcome to the first online edition of Missouriensis. The format has been redesigned to facilitate access and on-screen readability, and articles are freely available online as open source, archival pdfs.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolutionary History of Floral Key Innovations in Angiosperms Elisabeth Reyes
    Evolutionary history of floral key innovations in angiosperms Elisabeth Reyes To cite this version: Elisabeth Reyes. Evolutionary history of floral key innovations in angiosperms. Botanics. Université Paris Saclay (COmUE), 2016. English. NNT : 2016SACLS489. tel-01443353 HAL Id: tel-01443353 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01443353 Submitted on 23 Jan 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. NNT : 2016SACLS489 THESE DE DOCTORAT DE L’UNIVERSITE PARIS-SACLAY, préparée à l’Université Paris-Sud ÉCOLE DOCTORALE N° 567 Sciences du Végétal : du Gène à l’Ecosystème Spécialité de Doctorat : Biologie Par Mme Elisabeth Reyes Evolutionary history of floral key innovations in angiosperms Thèse présentée et soutenue à Orsay, le 13 décembre 2016 : Composition du Jury : M. Ronse de Craene, Louis Directeur de recherche aux Jardins Rapporteur Botaniques Royaux d’Édimbourg M. Forest, Félix Directeur de recherche aux Jardins Rapporteur Botaniques Royaux de Kew Mme. Damerval, Catherine Directrice de recherche au Moulon Président du jury M. Lowry, Porter Curateur en chef aux Jardins Examinateur Botaniques du Missouri M. Haevermans, Thomas Maître de conférences au MNHN Examinateur Mme. Nadot, Sophie Professeur à l’Université Paris-Sud Directeur de thèse M.
    [Show full text]
  • GENOME EVOLUTION in MONOCOTS a Dissertation
    GENOME EVOLUTION IN MONOCOTS A Dissertation Presented to The Faculty of the Graduate School At the University of Missouri In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy By Kate L. Hertweck Dr. J. Chris Pires, Dissertation Advisor JULY 2011 The undersigned, appointed by the dean of the Graduate School, have examined the dissertation entitled GENOME EVOLUTION IN MONOCOTS Presented by Kate L. Hertweck A candidate for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy And hereby certify that, in their opinion, it is worthy of acceptance. Dr. J. Chris Pires Dr. Lori Eggert Dr. Candace Galen Dr. Rose‐Marie Muzika ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am indebted to many people for their assistance during the course of my graduate education. I would not have derived such a keen understanding of the learning process without the tutelage of Dr. Sandi Abell. Members of the Pires lab provided prolific support in improving lab techniques, computational analysis, greenhouse maintenance, and writing support. Team Monocot, including Dr. Mike Kinney, Dr. Roxi Steele, and Erica Wheeler were particularly helpful, but other lab members working on Brassicaceae (Dr. Zhiyong Xiong, Dr. Maqsood Rehman, Pat Edger, Tatiana Arias, Dustin Mayfield) all provided vital support as well. I am also grateful for the support of a high school student, Cady Anderson, and an undergraduate, Tori Docktor, for their assistance in laboratory procedures. Many people, scientist and otherwise, helped with field collections: Dr. Travis Columbus, Hester Bell, Doug and Judy McGoon, Julie Ketner, Katy Klymus, and William Alexander. Many thanks to Barb Sonderman for taking care of my greenhouse collection of many odd plants brought back from the field.
    [Show full text]
  • Floerkea Proserpinacoides Willdenow False Mermaid-Weed
    New England Plant Conservation Program Floerkea proserpinacoides Willdenow False Mermaid-weed Conservation and Research Plan for New England Prepared by: William H. Moorhead III Consulting Botanist Litchfield, Connecticut and Elizabeth J. Farnsworth Senior Research Ecologist New England Wild Flower Society Framingham, Massachusetts For: New England Wild Flower Society 180 Hemenway Road Framingham, MA 01701 508/877-7630 e-mail: [email protected] • website: www.newfs.org Approved, Regional Advisory Council, December 2003 1 SUMMARY Floerkea proserpinacoides Willdenow, false mermaid-weed, is an herbaceous annual and the only member of the Limnanthaceae in New England. The species has a disjunct but widespread range throughout North America, with eastern and western segregates separated by the Great Plains. In the east, it ranges from Nova Scotia south to Louisiana and west to Minnesota and Missouri. In the west, it ranges from British Columbia to California, east to Utah and Colorado. Although regarded as Globally Secure (G5), national ranks of N? in Canada and the United States indicate some uncertainly about its true conservation status in North America. It is listed as rare (S1 or S2) in 20% of the states and provinces in which it occurs. Floerkea is known from only 11 sites total in New England: three historic sites in Vermont (where it is ranked SH), one historic population in Massachusetts (where it is ranked SX), and four extant and three historic localities in Connecticut (where it is ranked S1, Endangered). The Flora Conservanda: New England ranks it as a Division 2 (Regionally Rare) taxon. Floerkea inhabits open or forested floodplains, riverside seeps, and limestone cliffs in New England, and more generally moist alluvial soils, mesic forests, springy woods, and streamside meadows throughout its range.
    [Show full text]
  • Patterns of Flammability Across the Vascular Plant Phylogeny, with Special Emphasis on the Genus Dracophyllum
    Lincoln University Digital Thesis Copyright Statement The digital copy of this thesis is protected by the Copyright Act 1994 (New Zealand). This thesis may be consulted by you, provided you comply with the provisions of the Act and the following conditions of use: you will use the copy only for the purposes of research or private study you will recognise the author's right to be identified as the author of the thesis and due acknowledgement will be made to the author where appropriate you will obtain the author's permission before publishing any material from the thesis. Patterns of flammability across the vascular plant phylogeny, with special emphasis on the genus Dracophyllum A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of philosophy at Lincoln University by Xinglei Cui Lincoln University 2020 Abstract of a thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of philosophy. Abstract Patterns of flammability across the vascular plant phylogeny, with special emphasis on the genus Dracophyllum by Xinglei Cui Fire has been part of the environment for the entire history of terrestrial plants and is a common disturbance agent in many ecosystems across the world. Fire has a significant role in influencing the structure, pattern and function of many ecosystems. Plant flammability, which is the ability of a plant to burn and sustain a flame, is an important driver of fire in terrestrial ecosystems and thus has a fundamental role in ecosystem dynamics and species evolution. However, the factors that have influenced the evolution of flammability remain unclear.
    [Show full text]
  • Vicariance, Climate Change, Anatomy and Phylogeny of Restionaceae
    Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society (2000), 134: 159–177. With 12 figures doi:10.1006/bojl.2000.0368, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on Under the microscope: plant anatomy and systematics. Edited by P. J. Rudall and P. Gasson Vicariance, climate change, anatomy and phylogeny of Restionaceae H. P. LINDER FLS Bolus Herbarium, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa Cutler suggested almost 30 years ago that there was convergent evolution between African and Australian Restionaceae in the distinctive culm anatomical features of Restionaceae. This was based on his interpretation of the homologies of the anatomical features, and these are here tested against a ‘supertree’ phylogeny, based on three separate phylogenies. The first is based on morphology and includes all genera; the other two are based on molecular sequences from the chloroplast genome; one covers the African genera, and the other the Australian genera. This analysis corroborates Cutler’s interpretation of convergent evolution between African and Australian Restionaceae. However, it indicates that for the Australian genera, the evolutionary pathway of the culm anatomy is much more complex than originally thought. In the most likely scenario, the ancestral Restionaceae have protective cells derived from the chlorenchyma. These persist in African Restionaceae, but are soon lost in Australian Restionaceae. Pillar cells and sclerenchyma ribs evolve early in the diversification of Australian Restionaceae, but are secondarily lost numerous times. In some of the reduction cases, the result is a very simple culm anatomy, which Cutler had interpreted as a primitively simple culm type, while in other cases it appears as if the functions of the ribs and pillars may have been taken over by a new structure, protective cells developed from epidermal, rather than chlorenchyma, cells.
    [Show full text]
  • Jan Dvorak (As Quickly Written Down by a Person with Poor Hearing…Me)
    1/22/2018 The Impact of Polyploidy on Genome Evolution in Poales and Other Monocots “I don’t have to emphasize that gene duplications are the fabric of evolution in plants.” -Jan Dvorak (as quickly written down by a person with poor hearing…me) Michael R. McKain The University of Alabama @mrmckain @mrmckain Poales Diversity Grass genomes: the choose your own adventure of genome evolution • ~22,800 species • ~11,088 species in Poaceae • Transposons (McClintock, Wessler) • GC content bias (Carels and Bernardi 2000) • Three WGD events 0 0 4 0 0 • rho (Peterson et al. 2004) 3 y c n 0 e 0 u 2 q e r F • 0 sigma (Tang et al. 2010) 0 1 • tau (Tang et al. 2010, Jiao et al. 2014) 0 %GC Givnish et al. 2010 @mrmckain Schnable et al., 2009 Zeroing in on WGD placement Banana genome Pineapple genome How has ancient polyploidy altered the genomic landscape in grasses and other Poales? D’Hont et al. 2012 Ming, VanBuren et al. 2015 Recovered sigma after grass divergence from commelinids Recovered sigma after grass+pineapple divergence from commelinids @mrmckain @mrmckain 1 1/22/2018 Phylotranscriptomic approach Coalescence-based Phylogeny of 234 Single-copy genes • Sampling 27 transcriptomes and 7 genomes • Phylogeny consistent with previous • Representation for all families (except Thurniaceae) in nuclear gene results Poales • Conflicting topology with • RNA from young leaf or apical meristem, a combination of chloroplast genome tree: Moncot Tree of Life and 1KP • Ecdeiocolea/Joinvillea sister instead of • General steps: a grade • Trinity assembly • Typha
    [Show full text]
  • Lyginiaceae, Two New Families of Poales in Western Australia, with Revisions of Hopkinsia and Lyginia
    477 Hopkinsiaceae and Lyginiaceae, two new families of Poales in Western Australia, with revisions of Hopkinsia and Lyginia Barbara G. Briggs and L.A.S. Johnson† Abstract Briggs, Barbara G. & Johnson, L.A.S. (Royal Botanic Gardens, Mrs Macquaries Road, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia) 2000. Hopkinsiaceae and Lyginiaceae, two new families of Poales in Western Australia, with revisions of Hopkinsia and Lyginia. Telopea 8 (4): 477–502. Hopkinsia and Lyginia are excluded from Restionaceae and the new families Hopkinsiaceae and Lyginiaceae established. DNA sequence data from the chloroplast gene rbcL, the trnL intron and trnL–trnF intergenic spacer indicate that these genera are more closely allied to Anarthriaceae than to Restionaceae, although differing markedly from the former in vegetative morphology and anatomy. The contrasting results of cladistic analyses of DNA sequence data and morphological data are discussed, as are the reasons for excluding these genera from Restionaceae and Anarthriaceae. Extensive descriptions of the new families are given and a key provided to these and related families. The features that they share with Restionaceae are considered to be largely plesiomorphic within Poales or associated with their occurrence, like many Restionaceae, in conditions of seasonal drought. Occurring in a region of great diversity of Restionaceae, their distinctiveness was overlooked until the new DNA evidence became available. Distinctive features for Hopkinsia include the ovary structure, style with stigmatic branches that are themselves branched, fleshy pedicels, and fruit with both woody and fleshy layers. Distinctive for Lyginia are the oblique epidermal cells and stomates, distinctive chlorenchyma structure, fused staminal filaments, seed ornamentation and presence of unusual chemical constituents (allose, allosides and fructan-type oligosaccharides).
    [Show full text]