Third Winchester Driving Tour
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Chapel Rural Historic District Other Nameslsite Number: VDHR File No
NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin, How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "NIA" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. 1. Name of Property LISTED ON: Historic name: Chapel Rural Historic District Other nameslsite number: VDHR File No. 021-5025 121121201 3 Name of related multiple property listing: NIA NRHP 02/14/2014 (Enter "NIA" if property is not part of a multiple property listing 2. Location Street & number: Generallv centered along Lord Fairfax Hwy. from Millwood (south) to Harry Byrd Hw. (north); from Salem Church Rd. (west) to Chilly Hollow Rd. (east City or town: Millwood, Boyce, Berryville State: Virginia County: Clarke Not For Publication: /N/A Vicinity: 3. StatelFederal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this nomination -request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property X meets -does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant at the following level(s) of significance: national -statewide X local Glicable National Register Criteria: 1 Virginia Department of Historic Resources I 1 State or Federal agencylbureau or Tribal Government I In my opinion, the property -meets -does not meet the National Register criteria. -
List of Staff Officers of the Confederate States Army. 1861-1865
QJurttell itttiuetsity Hibrary Stliaca, xV'cni tUu-k THE JAMES VERNER SCAIFE COLLECTION CIVIL WAR LITERATURE THE GIFT OF JAMES VERNER SCAIFE CLASS OF 1889 1919 Cornell University Library E545 .U58 List of staff officers of the Confederat 3 1924 030 921 096 olin The original of this book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924030921096 LIST OF STAFF OFFICERS OF THE CONFEDERATE STATES ARMY 1861-1865. WASHINGTON: GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE. 1891. LIST OF STAFF OFFICERS OF THE CONFEDERATE ARMY. Abercrombie, R. S., lieut., A. D. C. to Gen. J. H. Olanton, November 16, 1863. Abercrombie, Wiley, lieut., A. D. C. to Brig. Gen. S. G. French, August 11, 1864. Abernathy, John T., special volunteer commissary in department com- manded by Brig. Gen. G. J. Pillow, November 22, 1861. Abrams, W. D., capt., I. F. T. to Lieut. Gen. Lee, June 11, 1864. Adair, Walter T., surg. 2d Cherokee Begt., staff of Col. Wm. P. Adair. Adams, , lieut., to Gen. Gauo, 1862. Adams, B. C, capt., A. G. S., April 27, 1862; maj., 0. S., staff General Bodes, July, 1863 ; ordered to report to Lieut. Col. R. G. Cole, June 15, 1864. Adams, C, lieut., O. O. to Gen. R. V. Richardson, March, 1864. Adams, Carter, maj., C. S., staff Gen. Bryan Grimes, 1865. Adams, Charles W., col., A. I. G. to Maj. Gen. T. C. Hiudman, Octo- ber 6, 1862, to March 4, 1863. Adams, James M., capt., A. -
Great Discoveries at Pritchard's Hill Cemetery
Summer 2021 • Newsletter of the KernstownKernstown Battlefi eldeld AssociationAssociation •• PP.O..O. BoxBox 13271327 •• WWinchester,inchester, VVirginiairginia 2260422604 •• wwwwww.kernstownbattle.org.kernstownbattle.org Great Discoveries at Pritchard’s Hill Cemetery With only one headstone visible, it’s always been a guess as to how many graves are in the cemetery on Pritchard’s Hill, and where they are located. On Thursday, April 8th GeoModel, a company from Leesburg, Virginia specializing in Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR), was hired by the KBA Board of Dirctors to survey our cemetery to help us deter- mine the number and exact location of the graves. Matt Turner from GeoModel laid out a grid around the existing cemetery and surveyed the entire area. He located 14 gravesites, Pushing his GPR equipment, Matt Turner of GeoModel all located fairly close together, laid east to west. While we have some idea who is buried surveys the Pritchard cemetery. Susan Baldwin’s head- stone stands in the foreground. in the cemetery we will never know who is buried in which grave. However, now when we give tours we can say with certainty that there are at least 14 graves on the hillside. In addition to the one headstone, marked as the grave of Susan (Pritchard) Baldwin, records show the following individuals are also buried on the hill: Susan’s grandfather, Reese Pritchard Jr. (1710 – 1760); her father, Stephen Pritchard I (1745 – 1819); her brother, Stephen Pritchard II (1776 – 1858); and her sister, Margaret (1772 – 1819). We know at least five other family mem- SUSAN JAMES BALDWIN bers are in the cemetery, including two-year- Third wife and widow of old Margaret, daughter of Samuel and Helen CORNELIUS BALDWIN Pritchard who occupied Brightside during the war. -
Confederate Forces at the Same Time
CHICAGO CIVIL WAR ROUNDTABLE SHENANDOAH VALLEY – 1864 Shenandoah Valley Map 1864 CHICAGO CIVIL WAR ROUNDTABLE SHENANDOAH VALLEY – 1864 Page 1 of 83 Table of Contents Shenandoah Valley Map 1864 ...................................................................................................................... 0 Shenandoah 1864 by Jonathan Sebastian .................................................................................................... 3 Lower Shenandoah Valley ............................................................................................................................. 9 Army of the Shenandoah ............................................................................................................................ 10 Army of the Valley....................................................................................................................................... 11 Maps ........................................................................................................................................................... 12 Overview Shenandoah Valley Campaigns May-June 1864 ..................................................................... 12 Battle of New Market Map 1 .................................................................................................................. 13 Battle of New Market Map 2 .................................................................................................................. 14 Battle of New Market Map 3 ................................................................................................................. -
The Battle of Sailor's Creek
THE BATTLE OF SAILOR’S CREEK: A STUDY IN LEADERSHIP A Thesis by CLOYD ALLEN SMITH JR. Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS December 2005 Major Subject: History THE BATTLE OF SAILOR’S CREEK: A STUDY IN LEADERSHIP A Thesis by CLOYD ALLEN SMITH JR. Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Approved by: Chair of Committee, Joseph Dawson Committee Members, James Bradford Joseph Cerami Head of Department, Walter L. Buenger December 2005 Major Subject: History iii ABSTRACT The Battle of Sailor’s Creek: A Study in Leadership. (December 2005) Cloyd Allen Smith Jr., B.A., Slippery Rock University Chair: Dr. Joseph Dawson The Battle of Sailor’s Creek, 6 April 1865, has been overshadowed by Lee’s surrender at Appomattox Court House several days later, yet it is an example of the Union military war machine reaching its apex of war making ability during the Civil War. Through Ulysses S. Grant’s leadership and that of his subordinates, the Union armies, specifically that of the Army of the Potomac, had been transformed into a highly motivated, organized and responsive tool of war, led by confident leaders who understood their commander’s intent and were able to execute on that intent with audacious initiative in the absence of further orders. After Robert E. Lee’s Army of Northern Virginia escaped from Petersburg and Richmond on 2 April 1865, Grant’s forces chased after Lee’s forces with the intent of destroying the mighty and once feared iv protector of the Confederate States in the hopes of bringing a swift end to the long war. -
5Th West Virginia Infantry
5th West Virginia Infantry Battle and Service History of the 5th West Virginia Infantry, U.S. Volunteers Service and Battle History of the 5th West Virginia Infantry, U.S. Volunteers, from Frederick Dyer's, A Compendium of the War of the Rebellion. Organized at Ceredo, W. Va., September 2, 1861, and mustered in October 18, 1861. Served Unattached, District of the Kanawha, West Virginia, to March, 1862. District of Cumberland, Md., Mountain Department, to April, 1862. Milroy's Independent Brigade, Mountain Department, to June, 1862. Milroy's Independent Brigade, 1st Army Corps, Army of Virginia, to September, 1862. Defenses of Washington, D. C., to October, 1862. District of the Kanawha, West Virginia, Dept. Ohio, to January, 1863. Unattached, District of the Kanawha, West Virginia, to March, 1863. 1st Brigade, 3rd Division, 8th Army Corps, Middle Department, to June, 1863. 1st Brigade, Scammon's Division, Dept. of West Virginia, to December, 1863. 1st Brigade, 3rd Division, West Virginia, to April, 1864. 1st Brigade, 2nd Infantry Division, West Virginia, to November, 1864. SERVICE.-Duty at Ceredo and in the Kanawha Valley, W. Va., to December 10, 1861. Moved to Parkersburg, W. Va., December 10, thence to New Creek, W. Va., February, 1862. Linn Creek, Logan County, February 8. Duty at New Creek till May. Joined Milroy's Brigade May 2. Battle of McDowell May 8. Near Franklin May 10-12 and May 26. Battle of Cross Keys June 8. At Strasburg June 20-July 5. Advance to Luray July 5-11. Moved to Sperryville July 11, thence to Woodville July 22, and duty there till August 9. -
Civil War Fought for the Union Which Represent 52% of the Sons of Harvard Killed in Action During This Conflict
Advocates for Harvard ROTC . H CRIMSON UNION ARMY VETERANS Total served Died in service Killed in action Died by disease Harvard College grads 475 73 69 26 Harvard College- non grads 114 22 Harvard Graduate schools 349 22 NA NA Total 938 117 69 26 The above total of Harvard alumni who died in the service of the Union included 5 major generals, 3 Brigadier Generals, 6 colonels, 19 LT Colonels and majors, 17 junior officers in the Army, 3 sergeants plus 3 Naval officers, including 2 Medical doctors. 72% of all Harvard alumni who served in the Civil War fought for the Union which represent 52% of the sons of Harvard killed in action during this conflict. As result among Harvard alumni, Union military losses were 10% compared with a 21% casualty rate for the Confederate Army. The battle of Gettysburg (PA) had the highest amount of Harvard alumni serving in the Union Army who were killed in action (i.e. 11), in addition 3 Harvard alumni Confederates also died in this battle. Secondly, seven Crimson warriors made the supreme sacrifice for the Union at Antietam (MD) with 5 more were killed in the battles of Cedar Mountain (VA) and Fredericksburg (VA). As expected, most of the Harvard alumni who died in the service of the Union were born and raised in the Northeastern states (e.g. 74% from Massachusetts). However, 9 Harvard alumni Union casualties were from the Mid West including one from the border state of Missouri. None of these Harvard men were from southern states. The below men who made the supreme sacrifice for their country to preserve the union which also resulted in the abolition of slavery. -
John Cook Was a Diminutive 4 Feet 9 Inches Tall Upon His Enlistment at the Age of 14 on June 7, 1861
Photo courtesy of G. Dodge John Cook was a diminutive 4 feet 9 inches tall upon his enlistment at the age of 14 on June 7, 1861. He was born on August 10, 1846 in Cincinnati, Ohio. Before the war he was a laborer. At the Battle of Antietam, the young bugler was awarded the Medal of Honor for serving the guns. See story on page 25 . 6 ARLINGTON HISTORICAL MAGAZINE The Civil War Medal of Honor Recipients of Arlington National Cemetery BY GEORGE w. DODGE Medal of Honor recipients did not initially hold Arlington National Cemetery in high regard since it originated as a potter's field during the Civil War on May 13, 1864. Over 5,000 soldiers were interred within a year. 1 After the war, the remains of several thousand soldiers within a cir cuit of fifty miles from Washington were disinterred and reinterred in Ar lington. Many were unknown. It would take the burials of distinguished high-ranking officers to begin to alter the perception of Arlington Burial Grounds as a potter's field. When General Philip H. Sheridan died on August 5, 1888 at Nonquitt, Massachusetts, he held the highest ranking position in the U.S. armed forces. Sheridan is popularly regarded as one of the three most prominent Union gen erals from the Civil War, along with Ulysses S. Grant and William T. Sherman.2 Sheridan's burial in front of the main entrance of Arlington House ushered in an era in which interment at Arlington was desirable. A series of interments of major generals and an admiral followed Sheridan's burial: General George Crook 1890 Admiral David Porter 1891 General Montgomery Meigs 1892 General Abner Doubleday 1893 General Stephen Burbridge 1894 General Walter Gresham 1895 General John Gibbon 1896 General John Mason 1897 General William Rosecrans 1898 General Horatio Wright 1899 The next sequence which gradually increased the status of Arlington Na tional Cemetery was the series of interments of 95 Civil War Mydal of Honor recipients. -
BUY BONDS Walker, Ashlea H
SEN. TH,S P.PBR - I homT] —. CAMP HANCOCK [ ONE CENT POSTAGE | andyC I 04 W TR E N C Hv AMP Jli HfisSjD JACia'l I THE SOLDIERS’ NEWSPAPER OF CAMP HANCOCK, THE | MACHINE GUN TRAINING CENTER | —•*"- ’¦•'JR? |j/ Rjff i Qg-JS< VOL. 2. OCTOBER 16, 1918. No. 2. What President Wilson Thinks of Our American Soldier Executive’s Eye Easily Machine Gunners Graduate With “Click" Caught by Newspaper American Heroes In Line For Decorations AUGUSTA OOMS "CLICK" OFFICERS Story ot Sacrifices MIMES ANO ANO TRAINED MEN For the Nation MW SMOKES JOIN DIVISIONS Daily Correspondence From White House Repeatedly Punc- tuated With Simple Notes Showing How President’s City Proves Its Reputation For One Hundred and Fifty Second Heart Beats For Families That Give and Grieve Generosity and Hospitality. Lieutenants Graduate. Many Gives Tobacco. Books and Officers Commissioned in In- By JOSEPH P. TUMULTY Candy Abundantly. Patrioti- fantry and Cavalry Complete Secretary to the President cally Furnishes Flags Machine Gun Course. Enlisted Splendid dn » Men Receive Train- * SOLDIERS APPRECIATE Especially for Trench and Camp » wCTk iLI Vfcf. THE ing. All Thoroughly Equipped Written KINDNESS America's new divisions are going t<* • graduates Gun . .W have of the Machine 4411 T HEN I look at you, I feel as if I also Welfare Organizations Com- Training Center behind the Brownings we IHaff that will play a staccato accompani- Yl and all were enlisted men. Not bined Under Direction of Au- ment to the swan song of the Hun. Of- <9 ficers and men. the machine gunners enlisted in your particular branch of AT'iEneiOxbr nsr x-ikte- for xsecoitxattcots', r gusta Committee Perform who will help boost the Boche back to service, but <£> rmvrej-s, Berlin will have on them the unmistak- the enlisted to serve the Excellent Service. -
1 Styple, William B., Ed. Generals in Bronze: Interviewing the Commanders of the Civil War. Kearny, N.J.: Belle Grove Publis
Styple, William B., ed. Generals in Bronze: Interviewing the Commanders of the Civil War. Kearny, N.J.: Belle Grove Publishing, 2005. Interview of Generals by sculptor, James Kelly Boyhood memories of the war, viiff New York, alcohol, viii=ix Lincoln’s reelection, ix-xi Fall of Richmond, Lincoln assassination, xi-xii Postwar life, xiiff Sheridan’s ride, xx Philip H. Sheridan, described, 1 Sword, Cedar Creek, 2-3 George A. Forsyth, Lee and Appomattox, 3-5 Grant, Sherman, 11 Sheridan at Cedar Creek, 11 Biographical background on Sheridan, 12ff Sherman, 18 Grant and Sherman, 22 Ely Samuel Parker, Overland campaign, Wilderness, Grant, Hancock, 23-25 Ely Samuel Parker, Appomattox, 25-27 Grant described, 30 Grant, James Harrison Wilson, swearing, 30 Shiloh, Grant, Sherman, 31 Grant, Lee, Appomattox, 31 Grant’s death and funeral, 35-37 John A. Logan described, Sherman, 38 Hooker described, 40 Peninsula campaign, Williamsburg, 40 Sickles, Meade, 41 Hooker on McClellan, 41 Stanton, 41 Hooker, Chancellorsville, 42-43 Rosecrans, alcohol, 43 Abner Doubleday, Fort Sumter, 45-47 John Gibbon, 47 McClellan, 47 Judson Kilpatrick, Hooker, 48-50, Jefferson C. Davis, Pea Ridge, 51, 55-56 Jefferson C. Davis, Sheridan, Cedar Creek, George Crook, Grant, 52 Winfield Scott Hancock, Gettysburg, 58-60 Sherman, 60 Jesse Reno, 60-61 Meade, Hancock, Warren, Gettysburg, Butterfield, Baldy Smith, 64-70 Daniel Butterfield, Gettysburg council of war, John Newton, Doubleday, Birney, Gibbon, Sickles, 71-80 Henry Slocum, Council of war at Gettysburg, 80-82 1 General Martin -
SONS of the AMERICAN REVOLUTION Oraanized April 30, 1689 Pr
OFFICIAL BULLETIN 01" THE NATIONAL SOCIETY 01" THI! SONS OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION Oraanized April 30, 1689 Pr.. ident General Incorporated b:r Act oi Conlll'eu June 9, 1906 Mooe• Greeley Parker, M. 0., Lowell, Mau. OCTOBER, 1911 Number 2 Volume VI Published at the office of the Secretary General (A. Howard Clark, Smithsonian Instl· tutlon), Washington, D. C., in May, October, December, and March. Entered as second-class matter, May 7, 1908, at the post-office at \Vashington, D. C., under the Act of July 16, t894· TnE OFFICIAL BuLLETIN records action by the General Officers, the Board of Trustees, the Executive and other National Committees, lists of members deceased and of new members, and important doings of State Societies. Secretaries of State Societies and of Local Chapters are requested to promptly communicate to the Secretary General ac- counts of all meetings or celebrations. PRACTICAL PATRIOTISM. Education of Aliens. The Society of the Sons of the American Revolution has done good work during the last twenty years in the erection of numerous monu ments and tablets commemorative of the important events and the eminent patriots of the War for Independence. Much has also been accomplished toward the permanent preservation of the records of that period. During the last four years the Society has been carrying on a still greater work in preserving the principles and the iastitutions founded by the men of I776. The millions of aliens in the United States are being taught what the Nation stands for, what it means for them to become a part of the body politic, participating in the duties and responsibilities of actiYe citizens in an intelligent manner. -
Satin Army Corps System
THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE ARMY CORPS SYSTEM IN THE UNION ARMY Allan Satin, Cincinnati Civil War Round Table, [email protected] © Allan Satin & Cincinnati Civil War Round Table, 2010, www.cincinnaticwrt.org At the end of the American Civil War, the Union Army was organized into army corps each with its own unique number which remained with it even if the corps was transferred from one army to another. How did this system develop in the Union Army? The United States Regular Army had no field commands larger than a regiment when the Civil War broke out in April 1861. Regiments were assigned to geographical departments with no intervening level of command. With the expansion of the armies resulting from the recruitment of the volunteer forces, command levels between the regimental and departmental levels were clearly required. At first, those departments with large enough field forces organized their new regiments into brigades (e.g. May 28 in the Department of Washington). As the forces became larger, divisions were formed (June 11 in the Department of Pennsylvania). The first major campaign was fought with armies organized into divisions (First Bull Run). Military men in the United States were familiar with the corps d’armée system as it had existed in the armies of Napoleon, but conservative commanders such as George B. McClellan and Don Carlos Buell were reluctant to form army corps in the armies under their command. McClellan wanted to postpone the creation of army corps until he had tested his divisional commanders through active operations to see which of them would be capable of commanding at the army corps level.