DOCSLIB.ORG

Bibliography

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bibliography Bibliography Adams, J. (1998) ‘The Dynamics of Integration: Russia and the Near Abroad’, Demokratizatsiya, Winter, 50–64 Adebahr, C. (2014) ‘Reconciling European values and Western interests in Ukraine’, European Leadership Network, 7 July, available at: http://www.europeanleadershipnetwork.org/ reconciling-european-values-and-western-interests- in-ukraine_1604.html Allison, R. (2014) ‘Russian “Deniable” Intervention in Ukraine: How and Why Russia Broke the Rules’, International Affairs, 90:6, 1255–1297 Ambrosio, T. (2009) Authoritarian Backlash: Russian Resistance to Democratization in the Former Soviet Union (Ashgate, Farnham) Aslund, A. (2009) How Ukraine Became a Market Economy and Democracy (Peterson Institute for International Economics, Washington DC) Aslund, A. (2013a) ‘Ukraine’s Choice: European Association Agreement or Eurasian Union?’, Policy Brief Nr PB13-22 (Peterson Institute for International Economics, Washington DC, September) Aslund, A. (2013b) ‘The Basket Case’, Foreign Policy, 26 November Aslund, A. (2014) ‘The Maidan and Beyond: Oligarchs, Corruption, and European Integration’, Journal of Democracy, 25:3, 64–73 Averre, D. (2009) ‘Competing Rationalities: Russia, the EU and the “Shared Neighbourhood”’, Europe-Asia Studies, 61:10, 1689–1713 DOI: 10.1057/9781137516268.0013 Bibliography Balmaceda, M. (1998) ‘Gas, Oil and the Linkages between Domestic and Foreign Policies: The Case of Ukraine’,Europe-Asia Studies, 50:2, 257–286 Balmaceda, M. (2013) Politics of Energy Dependency: Ukraine, Belarus, and Lithuania between Domestic Oligarchs and Russian Pressure (University of Toronto Press, Toronto) BBC Ukraina (2011) ‘Chalii: Evrosoiuz signalizue pro “ofitziine okholodzhennia” v stosunkakh z Kievom’, 19 October BBC Ukraina (2012) ‘Ekspert: znizhka na gaz vid Mitnogo soiuzu trivatime lishe kil’ka rokiv’, 21 November BBC Ukraina (2013) Yanukovycha prosiat ‘vidklasti Ugodu z ES na rik’, 12 November Bennet, K. (2015) ‘What Does Putin Want’, American Interest, 20 March Bershidsky, L. (2013) ‘Vladimir Putin’s Big Soviet Dream’, Bloomberg Online, 23 September Bogomolov, A. & Lytvynenko, O. (2012) ‘A Ghost in the Mirror: Russian Soft Power in Ukraine’, Briefing Paper REP RSP BP 2012/01 (Chatham House, London, January) Bordachev, T. (2015) ‘Russia and the Eurasian Economic Union: The View from Moscow’, Commentary (ECFR, 21 January) Brenton, T. (2015) ‘Western arms will not make Russia back down’, Letter, Financial Times, 5 February Brill Olcott, M., Aslund, A. & Garnett, S. (1999) Getting It Wrong: Regional Cooperation and the Commonwealth of Independent States (Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Washington DC) Brzezinski, Z. & Sullivan, P. (1997) Russia and the Commonwealth of Independent States: Documents, Data, and Analysis (M. E. Sharpe, Armonk/London) Bueno de Mesquita, B., Smith, A., Siverson, R. & Morrow, J. (2003) The Logic of Political Survival (MIT Press, Cambridge MA) Bukkvoll, T. (2001) ‘Off the Cuff Politics – Explaining Russia’s Lack of a Ukraine Strategy’, Europe-Asia Studies, 53:8, 1141–1157 Bukkvoll, T. (2002) ‘Defining a Ukrainian Foreign Policy Identity: Business Interests and Geopolitical in the Formulation of Ukrainian Foreign Policy 1994–1999’, in Moroney, Kuzio & Molchanov (2002) Bukkvoll, T. (2004) ‘Private Interests, Public Policy: Ukraine and the Common Economic Space Agreement’, Problems of Post-Communism, 51:5, 11–22 DOI: 10.1057/9781137516268.0013 Bibliography Burakovsky, I. et al. (2010) ‘Costs and Benefits of FTA between Ukraine and the European Union’ (Institute for Economic Research and Policy Consulting, Kyiv) Casier, T., Korosteleva, E. & Whitman, R. (2013) ‘Building a Stronger Eastern Partnership: Towards an EaP 2.0’, Global Europe Policy Paper (University of Kent, Canterbury) Cenusa, D. et al. (2014) ‘Russia’s Punitive Trade Policy Measures towards Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia’, Working Document No.400 (CEPS, Brussels, September) Champion, M. (2013) ‘Putin’s Deal is no gift to gas-junkie Ukraine’, BloombergView, 30 December Chudowsky, V. (2002) ‘The Limits of Realism: Ukrainian Policy towards the CIS’, in Moroney, Kuzio & Molchanov (2002) Chudowsky, V. & Kuzio, T. (2003) ‘Does Public Opinion Matter in Ukraine? The Case of foreign Policy’,Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 36:3, 273–290 Collins, K. (2009) ‘Economic and Security Regionalism among Patrimonial Authoritarian Regimes: The Case of Central Asia’, Europe-Asia Studies, 61:2, 249–281 Connolly, R. (2013) ‘Russia, the Eurasian Customs Union and the WTO’, in Dragneva & Wolczuk (2013) Cooley, A. (2015) ‘Scripts of Sovereignty: The Freezing of the Russia- Ukraine Crisis and Dilemmas of Governance in Eurasia’ (Centre on Global Interest, Washington DC, January) Cooper, J. (2009) ‘Russia’s Trade Relations with the Commonwealth of Independent States’, in E. Wilson Rowe & S. Torjesen (eds), The Multilateral Dimension in Russian Foreign Policy (Routledge, London) Cooper, J. (2013) ‘The Development of Eurasian Economic Integration’, in Dragneva & Wolczuk (2013) Cooper, R. (1999) ‘The Meaning of 1989’, Prospect, December Council of Ministers (2013a) ‘Nikolai Azarov: Ukraina prodolzhaet podgotovku k Vil’nyusskomu sammitu’, Press Release, 20 November Council of Ministers (2013b) Resolution on suspending the preparatory process for concluding the Association Agreement with the EU’, 21 November D’Anieri, P. (2002) ‘Constructivist Theory and Ukrainian Foreign Policy’, in Moroney, Kuzio & Molchanov (2002) D’Anieri, P. (2006) Understanding Ukrainian Politics: Power, Politics, and Institutional Design (M.E. Sharpe, Armonk, NY) DOI: 10.1057/9781137516268.0013 Bibliography D’Anieri, P. (2012) ‘Ukrainian Foreign Policy from Independence to Inertia’, Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 45, 447–456 Dabrowski, M. & Taran, S. (2012) ‘Is Free Trade with the EU Good for Ukraine?’, CASE Network E-brief No. 6/2012 (CASE, Warsaw, March) Dangerfield, M. (2007) ‘The European Union and Post-Communist Europe: One Approach or Several?’, Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 23:4, 478–500 De Waal, T. (2014) ‘Regime Change Divides East and West’, Eurasia Outlook (Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 17 December) Delcour, L. (2011) Shaping the Post-Soviet Space? EU Policies and Approaches to Region-building (Ashgate, Furnham) Delcour, L. & Tulmets, E. (2009) ‘Pioneer Europe? The ENP as a Test Case for EU’s Foreign Policy’, European Foreign Affairs Review, 14:4, 501–523 Delcour, L. & Wolczuk, K. (2013) ‘Approximation of the National Legislation of Eastern Partnership Countries with EU Legislation in the Economic Field’, Study (DG for External Policies of the Union/ European Parliament, Brussels, May) Delcour, L. & Wolczuk, K. (2015) ‘Spoiler or Facilitator of Democratization?: Russia’s Role in Georgia and Ukraine’, Democratization, 1–20 Der Spiegel (2014) ‘Summit of Failure: How the EU Lost Russia over Ukraine’, Der Spiegel Online, 24 November Dimitrova, A. & Dragneva, R. (2013) ‘Shaping Convergence with the EU in Foreign Policy and State Aid in Post-Orange Ukraine: Weak Incentives, Powerful Veto Players’, Europe-Asia Studies, 65:4, 658–681 Donaldson, R. & Nogee, J. (2009) The Foreign Policy of Russia, 4th ed. (ME Sharpe, Armonk) Dragneva, R. (2004) ‘Is “Soft” Beautiful?: Another View on Law, Institutions and Integration in the Commonwealth of Independent States’, Review of Central and East European Law, 29:3, 279–324 Dragneva, R. (2013) ‘The Legal and Institutional Dimensions of the Eurasian Customs Union’, in Dragneva & Wolczuk (2013) Dragneva, R & de Kort, J. (2007) ‘Legal Regime for Free Trade in the CIS’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 56, 233–266 Dragneva, R. & Dimitrova, A. (2007) ‘Patterns of Integration and Regime Compatibility: Ukraine between the CIS and the EU’, in Malfliet, Verpoest & Vinokurov (2007) DOI: 10.1057/9781137516268.0013 Bibliography Dragneva, R. & Wolczuk, K. (2012) ‘Russia, the Eurasian Customs Union and the EU: Cooperation, Stagnation or Rivalry?’, Briefing Paper REP BP 2012/01 (Chatham House, London, August) Dragneva, R. & Wolczuk, K. (eds) (2013) Eurasian Economic Integration: Law, Policy and Politics (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham) Dragneva, R. & Wolczuk, K. (2014a) ‘Eurasian Economic Integration: Institutions, Promises and Faultlines’, in D. Cadier (ed.), The Geopolitics of Eurasian Economic Integration, Special Report (LSE, London, June) Dragneva, R. & Wolczuk, K. (2014b) ‘The EU-Ukraine Association Agreement and the Challenges of Inter-regionalism’, Review of Central and East European Law, 39:3, 213–244 Dragneva, R. & Wolczuk, K. (2015) ‘EU Emulation in the Design of Eurasian Integration’, in D. Lane & V. Samokhvalov (eds), The Eurasian Project and Europe: Regional Discontinuities and Geopolitics (Routledge, London) Dusseault, D. (ed.) (2007) The CIS: Form or Substance? (Aleksanteri Institute, Helsinki) EDB (2012) ‘Kompleksnaia otsenka makroekonomicheskogo effekta sotrudnichestva Ukrainy so stranami Tamozhennogo soiuza I Edinogo Ekonomicheskogo prostranstv v ramkakh EvrAzEs’ (EDB Centre for Integration Studies, St. Petersburg) EEAS (2015) Issues Paper on Relations with Russia, available at: http:// blogs.ft.com/brusselsblog/files/2015/01/Russia.pdf Emerson, M. (2014) ‘Russia’s economic interests and the EU’s DCFTA with Ukrainе’, Euractiv, 25 June Emerson, M. et al. (2006) The Prospect of Deep Free Trade between the EU and Ukraine (CEPS, Brussels, 10 April) Emmot, R. (2014) ‘Putin Warns Ukraine against implementing EU trade deal-letter’, Reuters, 23 September Englund, W. (2012) ‘Gazprom and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Yes 2012 Report.Pdf
    CONFERENCE OPENING Dear Friends, Today, countries are in a global race that gets faster and faster. I am not a political scientist - as an art collector I like to use art when I speak about global challenges. Let me use the famous photographer Andreas Gursky’s “Boxenstopp” as an analogy. A pit stop in Formula 1. One team is blue and yellow. This is Ukraine; these are Ukraine’s colours. What is the Ukrainian team doing? I believe - reforms. In the global race, reforms are pit stops allowing you to change and speed up. Some countries which were slow before improve their position. Like cars that put on the right new tires and fill up with the right amount of gasoline, they can overtake others. Others put on the wrong equip- ment or lose too much time in the pit stop and fall behind. I hope Ukraine’s team will be successful. And I hope for all of us this conference will be an intellectual pit stop where we refuel and re-equip ourselves, take in new energy and ideas, to help all our respective countries become smarter, better, more productive, more just. For this, we have fantastic speakers with us in Yalta, political leaders, business leaders, social leaders, intellectuals. I look forward to our discussions. Victor Pinchuk, Founder and Member of the Board, Yalta European Strategy 1 AGENDA 9th YALTA ANNUAL MEETING Ukraine and the World: Addressing Tomorrow’s Challenges Together AGENDA Thursday, September 13 21:20 – 21:25 Welcoming Remarks Aleksander Kwasniewski, President of Poland (1995-2005); Chairman of the Board, Yalta European Strategy
    [Show full text]
  • IFES Faqs on Elections in Ukraine
    Elections in Ukraine 2019 Presidential Election Frequently Asked Questions Europe and Eurasia International Foundation for Electoral Systems 2011 Crystal Drive | Floor 10 | Arlington, VA 22202 | www.IFES.org March 22, 2019 Frequently Asked Questions When is Election Day? ................................................................................................................................... 1 Why is this election important? .................................................................................................................... 1 What is the role of the president? ................................................................................................................ 1 What is the legal framework governing the elections? ................................................................................ 1 What is the electoral system? ....................................................................................................................... 2 Who are the candidates? .............................................................................................................................. 2 How are elections administered? ................................................................................................................. 3 Who can vote in these elections? ................................................................................................................. 4 How do citizens register to vote? ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • INTERNATIONAL ELECTION OBSERVATION MISSION Ukraine — Presidential Election, 17 January 2010
    NATO Parliamentary Assembly Assemblée parlementaire de l’OTAN INTERNATIONAL ELECTION OBSERVATION MISSION Ukraine — Presidential Election, 17 January 2010 STATEMENT OF PRELIMINARY FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS PRELIMINARY CONCLUSIONS The first round of the 17 January presidential election in Ukraine was of high quality and showed significant progress over previous elections. This election met most OSCE and Council of Europe commitments. Civil and political rights were respected, including freedom of assembly, association and expression. Election day was conducted in an efficient and orderly manner. This election saw a diverse field of candidates representing alternative political views, offering a genuine choice to the electorate. Candidates were able to campaign freely across the country without impediment. The campaign period was generally calm and orderly. Unsubstantiated allegations of large-scale electoral fraud negatively affected the pre-election atmosphere and voters’ confidence. In contradiction with the law, administrative resources were misused by candidates in official positions. More transparent campaign financing is necessary during the pre-election period. By voting in large numbers and freely expressing their will, Ukrainians have shown the desire to decide on the course of the country. The intertwining of political and economic interests had a negative influence and undermined public confidence in the political process, posing a challenge for Ukraine’s leadership. Election rules have to be set clearly and should not be a permanent subject of discussion. Regrettably, a unified election code has not yet been adopted in Ukraine. The existing election law as amended in August 2009 was a step backward compared to previous legislation. As a result, the legal framework remains unclear and incomplete.
    [Show full text]
  • Center for Civil Liberties
    CENTER FOR CIVIL LIBERTIES ANNUAL REPORT 2019 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CENTER FOR CIVIL LIBERTIES 2019 ADDRESS: 9g Baseina Str., of. 28, Kyiv, Email: [email protected] www.ccl.org.ua fb.com/ccl.org.ua Rapporteur — Serhii Okuniev Kyiv 2020 CONTENTS 1. Opening remarks 4 2. About Center for Civil Liberties 7 2.1 Reorganisation 8 2.2 Volunteers and interns 9 3. Coalitions and initiatives of the CCL 12 3.1 Activities of the Human Rights Agenda Platform 13 3.2 Overcoming the effects of armed conflict 19 3.3. #SaveOlegSentsov Campaign and actions in support of all Kremlin prisoners 24 3.4 OZONE Public Watchers Group 30 3.5. Euromaidan SOS 36 4. Protection of human rights and certain vulnerable groups 40 5. Human rights education and enlightenment 42 6. International advocacy 45 7. International solidarity 47 8. Achievements 50 9. Center for Civil Liberties team 52 10. Communications and cooperation with mass media 55 11. Financial report for 2019 56 WWW.CCL.ORG.UA 1. OPENING REMARKS re-election 2019 interim when I went to the platform The situation is complicat- year summed up the was a phone talk of a train ed by fragmentation within P previous five post- station employee — “Have you civil society itself and the Maidan years. Unfortunately, seen the faces of those scoun- widening gap within the after the Revolution of Dignity, drels in Parliament?” We move general public. The number there was no fundamental on to the next stage of course of of citizens involved in reset of political elites.
    [Show full text]
  • Opora Final Report on Observation at the 2019 Regular Presidential Elections in Ukraine
    OPORA FINAL REPORT ON OBSERVATION AT THE 2019 REGULAR PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS IN UKRAINE Kyiv― 2020 The publication was made possible due to support of American people pro- vided by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). Any opinions and statements expressed in this publication may not coin- cide with the official position of USAID and US Government. Authors Oleksandr Kliuzhev Oleksandr Neberykut Olha Kotsiuruba Robert Lorian Iurii Lisovskyi Grygorii Sorochan Endorsed by Olga Aivazovska Translation Svitlana Bregman Design by Viktoria Arkhypenko ISBN 978-617-7142-56-9 © OPORA, 2020 CONTENT ABOUT OPORA OBSERVATION 5 BACKGROUND INFORMATION OF THE REPORT 7 DETAILED SUMMARY 13 ELECTORAL SYSTEM AND ELECTORAL LAW 31 REGISTRATION OF CANDIDATES FOR THE POSITION OF THE PRESIDENT OF UKRAINE 35 CAMPAIGNING ACTIVITIES OF PARTIES AND CANDIDATES 39 Peculiarities of the early campaigning 40 Format of campaigning activities and early campaigning subjects 41 Campaigning activities of candidates within the electoral process 46 Campaigning activities of candidates during the preparation for the second round of voting 51 ADMINISTRATION OF THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS IN UKRAINE 55 CEC operations 56 Formation and activities of district election commissions 64 Establishing district election commissions 64 The first sessions of district election commissions 69 Rotation of the DEC membership 72 Formation of precinct election commissions 72 Launch of operations of precinct election commissions 78 Formation and organization of DEC operations
    [Show full text]
  • Public Opinion Survey in Ukraine 2008
    wh International Foundation for Electoral Systems “Change on the Horizon? Public Opinion in Ukraine before the 2010 Presidential Election” Findings from an IFES November 2009 Survey November 2009 This publication was produced by IFES for the U.S. Agency for International Development concerning Associate Award No. 121-A-00-09-00709-00, under Leader Agreement No. DFD-A-00-08-00350-00. Disclaimer The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. Page | 1 Ukraine Public Opinion Survey 2009 “Change on the Horizon? Public Opinion in Ukraine before the 2010 Presidential Election” Findings from an IFES November 2009 Survey Rakesh Sharma and Lauren Serpe © 2010 by IFES. All rights reserved. IFES 1850 K Street, NW Fifth Floor Washington, D.C. U.S.A. Notice of rights All rights reserved. No part of this report can be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means without the prior permission of the publisher. Printed in the United States of America. ISBN 1-931459-45-2 Page | 2 International Foundation for Electoral Systems IFES ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This publication was made possible through the generous support of the American People through the U.S. Agency for International Development, under the terms of Associate Award No. 121-A-00-09-00709- 00, under Leader Agreement No. DFD-A-00-08-00350-00. IFES would like to recognize the research, editing and publication assistance provided by members of its staff. Page | 3 Ukraine Public Opinion Survey 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD ................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ukraine Gender Review Are To
    34975 Public Disclosure Authorized UKRAINE GENDER REVIEW Public Disclosure Authorized by Nora Dudwick Radhika Srinivasan, Jeanine Braithwaite Public Disclosure Authorized ECSSD February 2002 Public Disclosure Authorized TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................4 BACKGROUND: TEN YEARS OF TRANSITION .........................................................4 OBJECTIVES OF THIS REVIEW ................................................................................5 METHODS............................................................................................................6 GENDER AND POVERTY IN UKRAINE: 2000.............................................8 INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................8 POVERTY RATES, GENDER, AGE, AND HOUSEHOLD TYPE ...................................11 LOCATION AND GENDER....................................................................................12 MATERIAL POVERTY: NUTRITION AND HOUSING.................................................12 Malnutrition .................................................................................................13 Housing type, ownership, and access to services.........................................14 CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS.....................................................................15 TABLES..............................................................................................................16
    [Show full text]
  • The Ukrainian Weekly 2006, No.15
    www.ukrweekly.com INSIDE:• More on the results of Ukraine’s elections — page 3. • “An unidentified guest” and our family collections — page 7. • Special pullout: Ukrainian Debutante Balls — pages 13-16. Published by the Ukrainian National Association Inc., a fraternal non-profit association Vol. LXXIV HE KRAINIANNo. 15 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, APRIL 9, 2006 EEKLY$1/$2 in Ukraine Tymoshenko and Moroz say Our Ukraine VerkhovnaT RadaU rejects calls W for complete recount of elections is backing out of forming Orange coalition by Zenon Zawada the whole system and how it subjugated by Zenon Zawada Ms. Tymoshenko added. Kyiv Press Bureau it today,” Mr. Symonenko said. Kyiv Press Bureau “I absolutely know that these boys, Outside the Parliament, more than 300 who did a lot toward ruining the hopes of KYIV – Ukraine’s Verkhovna Rada on protesters from all over Ukraine waved KYIV – Orange Revolution leaders the Orange Revolution, would rather eat April 4 rejected a recount of the parlia- the flags of losing political parties and Yulia Tymoshenko and Oleksander their hands than sign a memorandum in mentary elections, ignoring protests from voiced their complaints over what they Moroz accused Our Ukraine’s leadership which our political force has the right to politicians and their supporters who viewed as fraudulent elections. of trying to back out of forming an form the government,” Ms. Tymoshenko alleged that millions of ballots weren’t Leading the protests were Inna Orange coalition in the newly elected said. counted properly and that the elections Bohoslovska, leader of the Viche Party, Verkhovna Rada. Our Ukraine will not discuss distribut- were once again intentionally falsified.
    [Show full text]
  • Ukraine Page 1 of 39
    2009 Human Rights Reports: Ukraine Page 1 of 39 Home » Under Secretary for Democracy and Global Affairs » Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor » Releases » Human Rights Reports » 2009 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices » Europe and Eurasia » Ukraine 2009 Human Rights Reports: Ukraine BUREAU OF DEMOCRACY, HUMAN RIGHTS, AND LABOR 2009 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices March 11, 2010 Ukraine, with a population of 46 million, is a multiparty, democratic republic with a parliamentary-presidential system of government. Executive authority is shared by a directly elected president and a unicameral Verkhovna Rada (parliament), which selects a prime minister as head of government. Elections in 2007 for the 450-seat parliament were considered free and fair. A presidential election is scheduled for January 2010. Civilian authorities generally maintained effective control of the security forces. Human rights problems included reports of serious police abuse, beatings, and torture of detainees and prisoners; harsh conditions in prisons and detention facilities; arbitrary and lengthy pretrial detention; an inefficient and corrupt judicial system; and incidents of anti-Semitism. Corruption in the government and society was widespread. There was violence and discrimination against women, children, Roma, Crimean Tatars, and persons of non-Slavic appearance. Trafficking in persons continued to be a serious problem, and there were reports of police harassment of the gay community. Workers continued to face limitations to form and join unions, and to bargain collectively. During the year the government established the Office of the Governmental Commissioner for Anticorruption Policy, and the Ministry of Internal Affairs and the Prosecutor General's Office introduced a new system to improve the recording of hate-motivated crimes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Orange Revolution and the Revolution of Dignity in Comparison Why Some Resistance Movements Turn Violent, Whereas Others Do Not
    Graduate School of Social Sciences MSc Political Science – International Relations Track Master Thesis The Orange Revolution and the Revolution of Dignity in comparison Why some resistance movements turn violent, whereas others do not Name: Brian Pieneman Student ID: 10535365 Mail: [email protected] Research Project: Violence, resistance and restraint in war and genocide Supervisor: Dr. Jana Krause Second Reader: Dr. Dimitris Bouris Submission Date: June 22, 2018 Words: 23,810 Abstract According to Chenoweth and Stephan (2011), nonviolent resistance movements are more successful in accomplishing political and social change than their violent counterparts. And yet, some nonviolent resistance movements turn to violent strategies in their endeavour to establish political and social change. This decision seems counterproductive and is worth studying. This thesis argues that mass mobilization is a double-edged sword – i.e. on the one hand, mass mobilization is required to accomplish the objectives of a nonviolent resistance movement, but mass mobilization appeals to people with different motives to participate in a nonviolent resistance movement, on the other hand. To elaborate this argument, the (nonviolent) Orange Revolution and the (violent) Revolution of Dignity are extensively studied and compared. These case studies indicate that different motivations for participation in a nonviolent resistance movement can be problematic in case of a lack of leadership and unity within the resistance movement. ~ Nonviolence, Social Movements, Orange Revolution, Revolution of Dignity ~ Acknowledgements First and foremost, I would like to thank my thesis supervisor Dr. Jana Krause for her moral guidance and encouraging words during the thesis process. I admit that my process was far from flawless, it has been a true struggle and without the help of my supervisor I would, in all probability, not have been able to write this thesis and to submit this thesis today.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ukrainian Weekly 2014, No.6
    www.ukrweekly.com INSIDE: l Campaign of terror against Maidan protesters – page 3 l A preview of the Olympic Games in Sochi – page 9 l Photo report: The people of the Maidan – centerfold THEPublished U by theKRAINIAN Ukrainian National Association Inc., a fraternal W non-profit associationEEKLY Vol. LXXXII No. 6 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, FEBRUARY 9, 2014 $1/$2 in Ukraine No solution to Ukraine crisis as proposals diverge by Zenon Zawada KYIV – Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych has yet to decide on a solution to Ukraine’s political crisis and he doesn’t have much time left as Ukraine’s economy is in a tailspin. The Russian government decided to freeze its financial aid of $12 billion (3 billion was provided in December) and cheaper natural gas prices the day after Ukrainian Prime Minister Mykola Azarov resigned on January 28. Meanwhile, the hryvnia has fallen the most of any currency this year except the Argentine peso, hitting its lowest value in five years on February 5. “We estimate that National Bank reserves can fall to an alarming level of $15 billion already by the end of February, which can lead to further hryvnia devaluation beyond the Bank’s control, further cuts to Ukraine’s credit ratings and eventually lead to Ukraine’s default by the end of this spring,” said Alexander Paraschiy, the head of research at Concorde Capital investment bank in Kyiv. Most of the key players have offered their solution, except for the Yanukovych administration, which is still deciding. The proposals have turned out to be just as divergent as the inter- ests of the players involved, indicating that whatever decision is made will draw a fierce reaction from someone else.
    [Show full text]
  • INTERNATIONAL ELECTION OBSERVATION MISSION Ukraine — Presidential Election, 17 January 2010
    NATO Parliamentary Assembly Assemblée parlementaire de l’OTAN INTERNATIONAL ELECTION OBSERVATION MISSION Ukraine — Presidential Election, 17 January 2010 STATEMENT OF PRELIMINARY FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS PRELIMINARY CONCLUSIONS The first round of the 17 January presidential election in Ukraine was of high quality and showed significant progress over previous elections. This election met most OSCE and Council of Europe commitments. Civil and political rights were respected, including freedom of assembly, association and expression. Election day was conducted in an efficient and orderly manner. This election saw a diverse field of candidates representing alternative political views, offering a genuine choice to the electorate. Candidates were able to campaign freely across the country without impediment. The campaign period was generally calm and orderly. Unsubstantiated allegations of large-scale electoral fraud negatively affected the pre-election atmosphere and voters’ confidence. In contradiction with the law, administrative resources were misused by candidates in official positions. More transparent campaign financing is necessary during the pre-election period. By voting in large numbers and freely expressing their will, Ukrainians have shown the desire to decide on the course of the country. The intertwining of political and economic interests had a negative influence and undermined public confidence in the political process, posing a challenge for Ukraine’s leadership. Election rules have to be set clearly and should not be a permanent subject of discussion. Regrettably, a unified election code has not yet been adopted in Ukraine. The existing election law as amended in August 2009 was a step backward compared to previous legislation. As a result, the legal framework remains unclear and incomplete.
    [Show full text]