Natural Enemies and Mortality Factors of the Coffee

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Natural Enemies and Mortality Factors of the Coffee View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Texas A&amp;M Repository NATURAL ENEMIES AND MORTALITY FACTORS OF THE COFFEE LEAFMINER Leucoptera coffeella (GUÉRIN-MÉNÈVILLE) (LEPIDOPTERA: LYONETIIDAE) IN CHIAPAS, MEXICO A Dissertation by J. REFUGIO LOMELI FLORES Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY December 2007 Major Subject: Entomology NATURAL ENEMIES AND MORTALITY FACTORS OF THE COFFEE LEAFMINER Leucoptera coffeella (GUÉRIN-MÉNÈVILLE) (LEPIDOPTERA: LYONETIIDAE) IN CHIAPAS, MEXICO A Dissertation by J. REFUGIO LOMELI FLORES Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Approved by: Chair of Committee, Julio S. Bernal Committee Members, James B. Woolley Robert A.Wharton Roel R. Lopez Carlos E. Bográn Juan F. Barrera Head of Department, Kevin M. Heinz December 2007 Major Subject: Entomology iii ABSTRACT Natural Enemies and Mortality Factors of the Coffee Leafminer Leucoptera coffeella (Guérin-Ménèville) (Lepidoptera: Lyonetiidae) in Chiapas, Mexico. (December 2007) J. Refugio Lomeli Flores, B.S.; M.S., Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, México Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. Julio S. Bernal Through field surveys and laboratory experiments, this study assessed in part the impacts of host plant, natural enemies, and weather variables on coffee leafminer Leucoptera coffeella distribution and abundance at two elevations and two rainfall levels in coffee farms in Chiapas, Mexico. In addition, a checklist of Neotropical coffee leafminer parasitoids was assembled from field collections and literature review. Coffee leafminer field incidence was positively correlated with leaf nitrogen content and age, but in laboratory experiments coffee leafminers grew larger, developed faster, and had higher survivorship on leaves with moderate (2.9±0.01%) versus low (2.5±0.04%) or high (3.4±0.01%) nitrogen level, and on tough versus soft leaves. Ovipositional preference was not generally for leaves that maximized offspring performance. Coffee leafminer incidence was higher during the rainy versus dry season, and at low versus high elevation. Shade cover reduced ambient temperatures within coffee farms, but did not significantly affect coffee leafminer incidence. iv The coffee leafminer predator complex included 16 morphospecies, ~88% of them ants (Formicidae), and contributed >58% of real mortality. Predation rates were higher at high versus low elevation, and under high versus low rainfall. Predation was the main source of coffee leafminer mortality throughout the year, and was highest during the rainy season, when coffee leafminer incidence was highest. Neotropical coffee leafminer parasitoids included 23 species of Eulophidae and seven of Braconidae. In Chiapas, 22 larval parasitoid morphospecies were collected. Egg and pupal parasitoids were not recovered. Parasitism accounted for <10% of real mortality, and rates were 8-10-fold higher at low versus high elevation. Parasitism rates were not significantly influenced by temperature or rainfall. Coffee leafminer oviposited mostly during the night, and less under low versus high temperatures. Average monthly temperature minima, which occur during the night, were generally lower at high (~18 oC) versus low (~20 oC) elevation farms. The incidence and abundance of coffee leafminer may differ between elevations due to differences in temperature, because at high elevation lower temperatures likely reduced coffee leafminer oviposition, and may have increased its mortality rate as a consequence of longer development time and exposure to natural enemies. v ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I thank Dr. Julio S. Bernal for his permanent support, patience, and friendship. These years in his lab were full of new knowledge and ways to improve not only my academic performance but also the way to do the things right. I also want to thank my committee members: Dr. James Woolley, Dr. Robert Wharton, Dr. Roel Lopez, Dr. Juan F. Barrera, and Dr. Carlos Bográn for their guidance and support throughout my research. I thanks my friends and colleagues at the Bernal Lab: Andrea Joyce, James Butler, Veronica Manriquez, Rodrigo Diaz, Aldo Gardea, Brad Hopkins, Melissa Layton, and especially Pat and Alan Gillogly for their help, support and friendship. I would like to say thank you to all my classmates, colleagues, staff, and faculty in the Department of Entomology for making my time at Texas A&M a great experience. I thanks my friends and colleagues at El Colegio de la Frontera Sur (Joel Herrera M., Enrique López P., Román Montes, Guillermo López G., and Heber García) for their help during the development of experiments in Chiapas, Mexico. I also thank Federico Ochoa (Alpujarras), Alejandro Alvarez (La Gloria), Humberto Prada (El Encanto), Joaquín Erhlich (Lindavista) for permission granted to work on their farms. I thanks “Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo de la Caña de Azúcar” (Tuxtla Chico, Chiapas, Mexico), for the climatic data provided. I also thank CONACyT (Grant 91539) and Colegio de Postgraduados for funding my research. Thanks to Dr. Eduardo Aranda Delgado (Terranova Lombricultores, Xalapa, Veracruz) for lending me his vi coffee leafminer parasitoid collection. I thanks Dr. James Woolley and Dr. Robert Wharton (TAMU) for their help in the identification of coffee leafminer parasitoids, and to Dr. Jorge Valenzuela (Instituto de Ecologia, Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico) for the identification of ants. I thanks the editors of Bulletin of Entomological Research, The Canadian Entomologist, Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington, Memoirs of the American Entomological Institute, CAB International, Florida Entomologist, NRC Research Press (Canada), International Society of Hymenopterists, and to Mr. Lonny D. Coote (Wildlife Enforcement Division, CWS Environment Canada), and Drs. Chao- Dong Zhu (Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences), Gordon Gordh, (Center for Plant Health Science & Technology, USDA, APHIS, USA), Michael E. Schauff (Plant Sciences Institute Beltsville, MD, USA), Christer Hansson (Lund University, Sweden), John La Salle (Australian National Insect Collection), Mike Gates (Natural Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, USA), Eduardo Mitio Shimbori (Universidade Federal de Säo Carlos, Brazil), and Alejandro Gonzalez (Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León) for the permission granted to use the figures in chapter IV. I also wish to express my gratitude to my parents, Rigoberto and Josefina, my brothers, sisters and their families, whose support was unconditional throughout all my life. Finally, but not least, I would like to say thank you hundreds of times to my wife (Elena Vera-Villagran) and my little daughter (Elenita Lomeli-Vera) for their patience, encouragement, and support during these years living together in the United States, and for making my life full of love. vii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT.............................................................................................................. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS......................................................................................... v TABLE OF CONTENTS.......................................................................................... vii LIST OF FIGURES................................................................................................... ix LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................... xii CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION................................................................................ 1 Coffee leafminer distribution and biology .................................... 4 Host plant effects on coffee leafminer ........................................... 5 Coffee leafminer natural enemies .................................................. 7 Effects of weather on coffee leafminer .......................................... 9 Dissertation objectives and goals ................................................... 10 II HOST PLANT EFFECTS AND SELECTION IN A MONOPHAGOUS INSECT: COFFEE LEAFMINER Leucoptera coffeella (GUÉRIN- MÉNÈVILLE) (LEPIDOPTERA: LYONETIIDAE) .......................... 12 Introduction.................................................................................... 12 Materials and methods ................................................................... 16 Results............................................................................................ 25 Discussion...................................................................................... 39 III IMPACT OF NATURAL ENEMIES ON COFFEE LEAFMINER Leucoptera coffeella (LEPIDOPTERA: LYONETIIDAE) POPULATION DYNAMICS.............................................................. 46 Introduction.................................................................................... 46 Materials and methods ................................................................... 48 Results............................................................................................ 55 Discussion...................................................................................... 68 viii CHAPTER Page IV COFFEE LEAFMINER Leucoptera coffeella (LEPIDOPTERA: LYONETIIDAE) PARASITOIDS IN THE NEOTROPICAL REGION 75 Introduction...................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Moths Count Newsletter 2011
    16 Moths Count Newsletter 2011 Half Price Membership Offer Why not become a member of Butterfly Conservation for one Moths Count year at half the usual price? Offer available online from 16 th to 3 1st July 2 011 Ne wsl etter 2011 Membership subscriptions are essential to enable us to The NMRS: Pu tting continue all the important work we do to save threatened moths . By taking advantage of this special half price offer you will not Moths on the Map only get yourself a bargain but will also directly contribute to In the early days of the Moths Count project the the survival of these amazing creatures. Moths Count establishment of a National Moth Recording Scheme (NMRS) Contacts was extremely ambitious, particularly as many vice-counties As a member of Butterfly Conservation didn’t have a computerised dataset; records were stored you will receive the following benefits: General enquiries on a card-index or in some cases even on scraps of paper info @butterfly-conservation.org 01929 400209 in cardboard boxes! Furthermore, 34 vice-counties didn’t I New member welcome pack Richard Fox have an active County Moth Recorder. Fortunately, due to I Our exclusive full-colour magazine Butterfly , three times a year Surveys Manager the enthusiasm and willingness of many individuals these I Membership of your local Butterfly Conservation Branch rfox @butterfly-conservation.org 01626 368385 hurdles were overcome. The moth recording community I Opportunities to take part in monitoring and recording schemes Les Hill rose to the challenge of either volunteering themselves for I Regional newsletters and local events Database Manager the vital role of County Moth Recorder or in assisting in lhill @butterfly-conservation.org 01929 406008 the computerisation of hundreds of thousands of paper To take advantage of this special half price offer join online at Zoë Randle records enabling County Recorders to concentrate on the www.butterfly-conservation.org between 16th and 3 1st July Surveys Officer verification of records.
    [Show full text]
  • Micro-Moth Grading Guidelines (Scotland) Abhnumber Code
    Micro-moth Grading Guidelines (Scotland) Scottish Adult Mine Case ABHNumber Code Species Vernacular List Grade Grade Grade Comment 1.001 1 Micropterix tunbergella 1 1.002 2 Micropterix mansuetella Yes 1 1.003 3 Micropterix aureatella Yes 1 1.004 4 Micropterix aruncella Yes 2 1.005 5 Micropterix calthella Yes 2 2.001 6 Dyseriocrania subpurpurella Yes 2 A Confusion with fly mines 2.002 7 Paracrania chrysolepidella 3 A 2.003 8 Eriocrania unimaculella Yes 2 R Easier if larva present 2.004 9 Eriocrania sparrmannella Yes 2 A 2.005 10 Eriocrania salopiella Yes 2 R Easier if larva present 2.006 11 Eriocrania cicatricella Yes 4 R Easier if larva present 2.007 13 Eriocrania semipurpurella Yes 4 R Easier if larva present 2.008 12 Eriocrania sangii Yes 4 R Easier if larva present 4.001 118 Enteucha acetosae 0 A 4.002 116 Stigmella lapponica 0 L 4.003 117 Stigmella confusella 0 L 4.004 90 Stigmella tiliae 0 A 4.005 110 Stigmella betulicola 0 L 4.006 113 Stigmella sakhalinella 0 L 4.007 112 Stigmella luteella 0 L 4.008 114 Stigmella glutinosae 0 L Examination of larva essential 4.009 115 Stigmella alnetella 0 L Examination of larva essential 4.010 111 Stigmella microtheriella Yes 0 L 4.011 109 Stigmella prunetorum 0 L 4.012 102 Stigmella aceris 0 A 4.013 97 Stigmella malella Apple Pigmy 0 L 4.014 98 Stigmella catharticella 0 A 4.015 92 Stigmella anomalella Rose Leaf Miner 0 L 4.016 94 Stigmella spinosissimae 0 R 4.017 93 Stigmella centifoliella 0 R 4.018 80 Stigmella ulmivora 0 L Exit-hole must be shown or larval colour 4.019 95 Stigmella viscerella
    [Show full text]
  • Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) 321-356 ©Entomofauna Ansfelden/Austria; Download Unter
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Entomofauna Jahr/Year: 2007 Band/Volume: 0028 Autor(en)/Author(s): Yefremova Zoya A., Ebrahimi Ebrahim, Yegorenkova Ekaterina Artikel/Article: The Subfamilies Eulophinae, Entedoninae and Tetrastichinae in Iran, with description of new species (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) 321-356 ©Entomofauna Ansfelden/Austria; download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Entomofauna ZEITSCHRIFT FÜR ENTOMOLOGIE Band 28, Heft 25: 321-356 ISSN 0250-4413 Ansfelden, 30. November 2007 The Subfamilies Eulophinae, Entedoninae and Tetrastichinae in Iran, with description of new species (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) Zoya YEFREMOVA, Ebrahim EBRAHIMI & Ekaterina YEGORENKOVA Abstract This paper reflects the current degree of research of Eulophidae and their hosts in Iran. A list of the species from Iran belonging to the subfamilies Eulophinae, Entedoninae and Tetrastichinae is presented. In the present work 47 species from 22 genera are recorded from Iran. Two species (Cirrospilus scapus sp. nov. and Aprostocetus persicus sp. nov.) are described as new. A list of 45 host-parasitoid associations in Iran and keys to Iranian species of three genera (Cirrospilus, Diglyphus and Aprostocetus) are included. Zusammenfassung Dieser Artikel zeigt den derzeitigen Untersuchungsstand an eulophiden Wespen und ihrer Wirte im Iran. Eine Liste der für den Iran festgestellten Arten der Unterfamilien Eu- lophinae, Entedoninae und Tetrastichinae wird präsentiert. Mit vorliegender Arbeit werden 47 Arten in 22 Gattungen aus dem Iran nachgewiesen. Zwei neue Arten (Cirrospilus sca- pus sp. nov. und Aprostocetus persicus sp. nov.) werden beschrieben. Eine Liste von 45 Wirts- und Parasitoid-Beziehungen im Iran und ein Schlüssel für 3 Gattungen (Cirro- spilus, Diglyphus und Aprostocetus) sind in der Arbeit enthalten.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Cover Enhances Natural Enemy Diversity and Biological Control
    Forest cover enhances natural enemy diversity and biological control services in Brazilian sun coffee plantations Hugo Reis Medeiros, Yuri Campanholo Grandinete, Paul Manning, Karen A. Harper, G. Christopher Cutler, Peter Tyedmers, Ciro Abbud Righi, Milton Cezar Ribeiro To cite this version: Hugo Reis Medeiros, Yuri Campanholo Grandinete, Paul Manning, Karen A. Harper, G. Christopher Cutler, et al.. Forest cover enhances natural enemy diversity and biological control services in Brazilian sun coffee plantations. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, Springer Verlag/EDP Sciences/INRA, 2019, 39 (6), pp.50. 10.1007/s13593-019-0600-4. hal-02995101 HAL Id: hal-02995101 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02995101 Submitted on 9 Nov 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Agronomy for Sustainable Development (2019) 39: 50 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-019-0600-4 RESEARCH ARTICLE Forest cover enhances natural enemy diversity and biological control services in Brazilian sun coffee plantations Hugo Reis Medeiros1,2 & Yuri Campanholo Grandinete3 & Paul Manning4 & Karen A. Harper5,6 & G. Christopher Cutler4 & Peter Tyedmers 6 & Ciro Abbud Righi2,7 & Milton Cezar Ribeiro1 Accepted: 14 October 2019 /Published online: 6 November 2019 # The Author(s) 2019 Abstract Landscape structure and crop management directly affect insect communities, which can influence agriculturally relevant ecosystem services and disservices.
    [Show full text]
  • Kenai National Wildlife Refuge Species List, Version 2018-07-24
    Kenai National Wildlife Refuge Species List, version 2018-07-24 Kenai National Wildlife Refuge biology staff July 24, 2018 2 Cover image: map of 16,213 georeferenced occurrence records included in the checklist. Contents Contents 3 Introduction 5 Purpose............................................................ 5 About the list......................................................... 5 Acknowledgments....................................................... 5 Native species 7 Vertebrates .......................................................... 7 Invertebrates ......................................................... 55 Vascular Plants........................................................ 91 Bryophytes ..........................................................164 Other Plants .........................................................171 Chromista...........................................................171 Fungi .............................................................173 Protozoans ..........................................................186 Non-native species 187 Vertebrates ..........................................................187 Invertebrates .........................................................187 Vascular Plants........................................................190 Extirpated species 207 Vertebrates ..........................................................207 Vascular Plants........................................................207 Change log 211 References 213 Index 215 3 Introduction Purpose to avoid implying
    [Show full text]
  • A New Species of Chrysonotomyia Ashmead (Hymenoptera
    Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 2017; 5(3): 323-326 E-ISSN: 2320-7078 P-ISSN: 2349-6800 A new species of Chrysonotomyia Ashmead JEZS 2017; 5(3): 323-326 © 2017 JEZS (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae: Entedoninae) from Received: 18-03-2017 Accepted: 19-04-2017 Uttarakhand, India More Sandip Parshuram Department of Entomology, College of Agriculture, G.B. Pant More Sandip Parshuram and Meena Agnihotri University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, Abstract Uttarakhand, India The new species, Chrysonotomyia ricini sp. n. from Uttarakhand, India described in detail with illustrations. All the type specimens were reared from the pupae of Liriomyza trifolii (Burgess) (Diptera: Meena Agnihotri Agromyzidae), a leafmining fly attacking castor, Ricinus communis L. (Euphorbiaceae). A key for Department of Entomology, identification of the species of Chrysonotomyia in India is also provided. All the specimens are deposited College of Agriculture, G.B. Pant in the Insect Museum, Department of Entomology, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, University of Agriculture and Pantnagar, Uttarakhand, India. Technology, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand, India Keywords: Chrysonotomyia ricini sp. n, Eulophidae, India, Liriomyza trifolii, new species Introduction The genus Chrysonotomyia was first time proposed in 1904 by Ashmead [1] for the species [2] Eulophus auripunctatus Ashmead. Boucek synonymised Heterocharis Erdos with Neochrysocharis Kurdjumov, later Boucek and Askew [3] synonymised Halochariessa Erdos with Achrysocharis Girault. Chrysocharidia Erdos synonymised with Achrysocharis Girault by Boucek [4], he actualized that the character given for Chrysocharidia by Erdos, the length of apical fringe in wings, varied intraspecifically. Kamijo [5] and Boucek [6] individually exposed [7] that Achrysocharis was a synonym under Chrysonotomyia, after that Boucek and Graham placed Achrysocharella Girault as a synonym under Chrysonotomyia.
    [Show full text]
  • Biology and Biological Control of Common Gorse and Scotch Broom
    United States Department of Agriculture BIOLOGY AND BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF COMMON GORSE AND SCOTCH BROOM Forest Forest Health Technology FHTET-2017-01 Service Enterprise Team September 2017 The Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team (FHTET) was created in 1995 by the Deputy Chief for State and Private Forestry, USDA Forest Service, to develop and deliver technologies to protect and improve the health of American forests. This book was published by FHTET as part of the technology transfer series. This publication is available online at: http://bugwoodcloud.org/resource/pdf/commongorse.pdf How to cite this publication: Andreas, J.E., R.L. Winston, E.M. Coombs, T.W. Miller, M.J. Pitcairn, C.B. Randall, S. Turner, and W. Williams. 2017. Biology and Biological Control of Scotch Broom and Gorse. USDA Forest Service, Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team, Morgantown, West Virginia. FHTET-2017-01. Cover Photo Credits Top: Common gorse (Forest and Kim Starr, Starr Environmental, bugwood.org). Left of common gorse, top to bottom: Agonopterix umbellana (Janet Graham); Exapion ulicis (Janet Graham); Sericothrips staphylinus (Fritzi Grevstad, Oregon State University); Tetranychus lintearius (Eric Coombs, Oregon Department of Agriculture, bugwood.org). Bottom: Scotch broom (����������������������������������������������Eric Coombs, Oregon Department of Agriculture, bugwood.org). Right of Scotch broom, ��������������top to bottom: Bruchidius villosus (Jennifer Andreas, Washington State University Extension); Exapion fuscirostre (Laura Parsons, University of Idaho, bugwood.org); Leucoptera spartifoliella (Eric Coombs, Oregon Department of Agriculture, bugwood.org). References to pesticides appear in this publication. Publication of these statements does not constitute endorsement or CAUTION: PESTICIDES recommendation of them by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, nor does it imply that uses discussed have been registered.
    [Show full text]
  • Report 2018-19
    All India Co-ordinated Research Project on Biological Control of Crop Pests ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT 2018-19 Compiled and edited by B. Ramanujam Richa Varshney M. Sampath Kumar Amala Udayakumar Jagadeesh Patil K. Selvaraj Sunil Joshi Chandish R. Ballal ICAR - National Bureau of Agricultural Insect Resources Bengaluru 560 024 All India Co-ordinated Research Project on Biological Control of Crop Pests ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT 2018-19 Compiled and edited by B. Ramanujam Richa Varshney M. Sampath Kumar Amala Udayakumar Jagadeesh Patil K. Selvaraj Sunil Joshi Chandish R. Ballal ICAR- National Bureau of Agricultural Insect Resources Bengaluru 560 024 Cover page: Frontline demonstrations, large scale demonstrations, lab to land programs, extension activities and farmers’ meetings at different AICRP – BC centers Photo credits: All AICRP – BC centers Copyright © Director, National Bureau of Agricultural Insect Resources, Bengaluru, 2019 This publication is in copyright. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in retrieval system, or transmitted in any form (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise) without the prior written permission of the Director, NBAIR, Bengaluru except for brief quotations, duly acknowledged, for academic purposes only. Cover design: Sunil Joshi Technical Programme for 2018-19 I. BASIC RESEARCH I. Biodiversity of biocontrol agents from various agro-ecological zones I.1 National Bureau of Agricultural Insect Resources I.1.1 Taxonomic and biodiversity studies on parasitic Ichneumonidae
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Chalcidoidea and Mymarommatoidea
    Biodiversity Data Journal 4: e8013 doi: 10.3897/BDJ.4.e8013 Taxonomic Paper Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Chalcidoidea and Mymarommatoidea Natalie Dale-Skey‡, Richard R. Askew§‡, John S. Noyes , Laurence Livermore‡, Gavin R. Broad | ‡ The Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom § private address, France, France | The Natural History Museum, London, London, United Kingdom Corresponding author: Gavin R. Broad ([email protected]) Academic editor: Pavel Stoev Received: 02 Feb 2016 | Accepted: 05 May 2016 | Published: 06 Jun 2016 Citation: Dale-Skey N, Askew R, Noyes J, Livermore L, Broad G (2016) Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Chalcidoidea and Mymarommatoidea. Biodiversity Data Journal 4: e8013. doi: 10.3897/ BDJ.4.e8013 Abstract Background A revised checklist of the British and Irish Chalcidoidea and Mymarommatoidea substantially updates the previous comprehensive checklist, dating from 1978. Country level data (i.e. occurrence in England, Scotland, Wales, Ireland and the Isle of Man) is reported where known. New information A total of 1754 British and Irish Chalcidoidea species represents a 22% increase on the number of British species known in 1978. Keywords Chalcidoidea, Mymarommatoidea, fauna. © Dale-Skey N et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. 2 Dale-Skey N et al. Introduction This paper continues the series of checklists of the Hymenoptera of Britain and Ireland, starting with Broad and Livermore (2014a), Broad and Livermore (2014b) and Liston et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Atti Accademia Nazionale Italiana Di Entomologia Anno LIX, 2011: 9-27
    ATTI DELLA ACCADEMIA NAZIONALE ITALIANA DI ENTOMOLOGIA RENDICONTI Anno LIX 2011 TIPOGRAFIA COPPINI - FIRENZE ISSN 0065-0757 Direttore Responsabile: Prof. Romano Dallai Presidente Accademia Nazionale Italiana di Entomologia Coordinatore della Redazione: Dr. Roberto Nannelli La responsabilità dei lavori pubblicati è esclusivamente degli autori Registrazione al Tribunale di Firenze n. 5422 del 24 maggio 2005 INDICE Rendiconti Consiglio di Presidenza . Pag. 5 Elenco degli Accademici . »6 Verbali delle adunanze del 18-19 febbraio 2011 . »9 Verbali delle adunanze del 13 giugno 2011 . »15 Verbali delle adunanze del 18-19 novembre 2011 . »20 Commemorazioni GIUSEPPE OSELLA – Sandro Ruffo: uomo e scienziato. Ricordi di un collaboratore . »29 FRANCESCO PENNACCHIO – Ermenegildo Tremblay . »35 STEFANO MAINI – Giorgio Celli (1935-2011) . »51 Tavola rotonda su: L’ENTOMOLOGIA MERCEOLOGICA PER LA PREVENZIONE E LA LOTTA CONTRO GLI INFESTANTI NELLE INDUSTRIE ALIMENTARI VACLAV STEJSKAL – The role of urban entomology to ensure food safety and security . »69 PIERO CRAVEDI, LUCIANO SÜSS – Sviluppo delle conoscenze in Italia sugli organismi infestanti in post- raccolta: passato, presente, futuro . »75 PASQUALE TREMATERRA – Riflessioni sui feromoni degli insetti infestanti le derrate alimentari . »83 AGATINO RUSSO – Limiti e prospettive delle applicazioni di lotta biologica in post-raccolta . »91 GIACINTO SALVATORE GERMINARA, ANTONIO DE CRISTOFARO, GIUSEPPE ROTUNDO – Attività biologica di composti volatili dei cereali verso Sitophilus spp. » 101 MICHELE MAROLI – La contaminazione entomatica nella filiera degli alimenti di origine vegetale: con- trollo igienico sanitario e limiti di tolleranza . » 107 Giornata culturale su: EVOLUZIONE ED ADATTAMENTI DEGLI ARTROPODI CONTRIBUTI DI BASE ALLA CONOSCENZA DEGLI INSETTI ANTONIO CARAPELLI, FRANCESCO NARDI, ROMANO DALLAI, FRANCESCO FRATI – La filogenesi degli esa- podi basali, aspetti controversi e recenti acquisizioni .
    [Show full text]
  • Georges Guerrard-Samuel Perrottet, a Forgotten Swiss−French Plant Collector, Experimental Botanist and Biologist in India
    HISTORICAL NOTES Georges Guerrard-Samuel Perrottet, a forgotten Swiss−French plant collector, experimental botanist and biologist in India Anantanarayanan Raman The first French trade outpost was set up the eastern coast of Peninsular India shot The only item that celebrates Perrottet is in the coastal town of Pondichéry, now into prominence in recent years, when the obelisk in JBP (Figure 1). Puducherry (1193N, 7979E), southern Ang Lee made a few segments of his India by the French East-India Company Oscar runner The Life of Pi (2012) here. (Compagnie Française pour le Com- With spectacular flowering plants and Georges Guerrard–Samuel merce des Indes Orientales) in 1674. refreshing water features, JBP has re- Perrottet This outpost grew into the earliest mained a fascinating recreational facility French settlement. Its activities driven by in Pondichéry for several years. The Perrottet (Figure 2) was born in 1790 commercial interest got triggered. One 2011 cyclone ravaged JBP and it has not (1793?) in Vully of Vaud Canton of was the exploration – which turned sub- yet recovered from the damage. Cyclonic French-speaking Switzerland. He started sequently as exploitation – of the natural rain and other natural events have irrepa- wealth of India. That in turn, led to the rably damaged similar human creations consideration of growing plants in a for- in Peninsular India in the past. The mal ‘garden’ context, because estab- Marmelon Botanic Garden in Madras lished gardens existed in France: Jardin city (1302N, 8023E), India, created du Roi in Paris initiated by Joseph Pitton by James Anderson and managed by his de Tournefort and Antoine de Jussieu, nephew Andrew Berry in 1790s, was lost pioneering botanists of the day, was permanently due to the torrential cyclone operational from 1640.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Reports Tralia (Mountjoy 1979, Smith and Waterhouse 1988, Bossard 1991), and L
    Plant Protection Quarterly Vol.10(2) 1995 75 agricultural production and forestry op- erations and is increasing its abundance on conservation lands. Broom is also a se- rious weed in the United States and Aus- Research reports tralia (Mountjoy 1979, Smith and Waterhouse 1988, Bossard 1991), and L. spartifoliella has been introduced into the United States as a biological control agent for broom (Parker 1964). Approval to proceed with a biological control pro- Leucoptera spartifoliella Hübner as a biological gramme in New Zealand was gained af- ter preparation of an Environmental Im- control agent for broom in New Zealand pact Assessment (Syrett 1987). Preliminary information on the moth, P. Syrett and H.M. Harman, Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research, its life cycle and distribution in New Zea- PO Box 69, Lincoln, Canterbury, New Zealand. land, and its impact on broom has been published by Scheele and Syrett (1987) and Syrett (1989), respectively. The moth Summary populations. The large populations of is univoltine and adults (Figure 1) appear The present distribution of the twig- L. spartifoliella achieved in New Zea- in the field during December and January. mining moth Leucoptera spartifoliella land give this moth the potential to be Large numbers of moths can occur, so in New Zealand is almost the same as an effective biological control agent of that when branches are shaken the white that of its host plant, broom (Cytisus broom here, and its relatively rapid rate moths fly off giving the appearance of a scoparius). The moth spreads readily of colonization indicates that it should shower of small snowflakes.
    [Show full text]