DOCSLIB.ORG

Fully-Approved Jersey City Multifamily Development Opportunity

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fully-Approved Jersey City Multifamily Development Opportunity FULLY-APPROVED JERSEY CITY MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY The Offering Project Details BlueGate Partners has been exclusively retained to arrange for the sale of, or selec - Name: Van Leer Place tion of a co-development partner for, the fully-approved development site known Address: 110 Hoboken Avenue, as Van Leer Place in desirable Jersey City, New Jersey (the “Project” or “Site”). Situ - 127-139 Hoboken Avenue & ated along Jersey City’s northern border with Hoboken, the Site is approved for two, 244 Hoboken Avenue six-story, luxury apartment buildings with a total of 568 apartment homes (425,635 Jersey City, New Jersey 07310 RSF), 7,160 square feet of retail space and a 570-space structured parking garage. Lot Size (SF): 6.83 Acres; 297,425 SF With an abundance of transportation options easily accessible from the Project in - Block/Lot: Block 6902, Lots 15, 16 and 16.02 cluding Port Authority Trans-Hudson (“PATH”) rapid transit trains, New Jersey Transit Block 6005, Lot 2 & buses and commuter rail service and NY Waterway ferries, future residents will benefit Block 6001 Lots 10 and 11 from unparalleled access to the entire New York City metropolitan area. Residential Buildings: Two Height: Six stories The Site possesses two key cost advantages over other potential Jersey City devel - Approvals opments. First, Van Leer Place’s six-story building height allows for meaningful hard cost savings from the more expensive high-rise construction costs typically associ - Total Units: 568 ated with 500+ unit developments in Jersey City. Second, the parking garage Retail SF: 7,160 planned for the Project is a pre-cast, on-grade structured garage, which costs sig - Parking Spaces: 570 Garage Spaces nificantly less to construct than the below-grade or podium-style garages typical of 11 Surface Spaces large Jersey City developments. Exclusively Offered By s r r Ridgefield u e o v i c n R o C 501 n 1 d o Bronx Rutherford 503 9 s n Bloomfield a 63 d r u G Nutley Edgewater H 95 UNIQUE FULLY-APPROVED DEVELOPMENT SITE 7 North Lyndhurst 3 120 Bergen 278 Glen Ridge 95 BERGEN . The Site has received final site plan approval from the Jersey City Planning 21 e v A . h 506 r t D 5 Belleville R board and presents a rare opportunity to purchase, or partner, in a fully-ap - . D e F T North k r p Secaucus ib ESSEX Arlington T o y Central r e B o s Park r proved development site in one of the most desirable housing markets in the r i u e d g J 495 g h w Weehawken e 506 e N L inc Astoria oln Q country. Current approvals allow for the construction of 568 luxury apartments Union Tu ue nn e 7 City el ns 1 bo 9 Qu ro containing 425,635 RSF, 7,160 square feet of retail space and a 570-space nge Kearny Manhattan M een B HUDSON idto s r. w . n y r. Tun w Hoboken D ne k 280 9A l 508 R P structured parking garage containing 179,790 SF. Je rsey D e Harrison C F t 7 ity/H a ob t y oken S wa Bo i Sky und n Pulask ary e d r Ho a lla G nd 124 21 Tun Greenpoint nel Newark TPK W 278 EXCELLENT ACCESS TO HOBOKEN, JERSEY CITY AND MANHATTAN illi 1-9 M ams 1 a bur Jersey B n Br g 9 r h idg n 78 o a e o t Located in Jersey City along its northern border with Hoboken, the Project is City t k a ly n n B B r N Liberty . ew B r. one mile from both downtown Hoboken and the central business district of Newark ar State 22 . k B 440 r e ay Park B o Int'l Airport k Br T a o p idg t k Brooklyn Heights T e u t n e ly y r e n y n Jersey City. This affords residents access to the exceptional employment and s e nion r e l J 78 27 w e Newark N Bayonne lifestyle experiences offered by two of New Jersey’s most dynamic cities. With ON Bay 81 501 Brownsville Prospect additional seamless access to Manhattan only eight minutes from the Hobo - Elizabeth 160 Park e d. Linden Blv 27 ken Terminal, future residents will be just minutes away from the largest popu - e Flatbush n Upper Brooklyn n e o g New York y d lation, employment and cultural center in the United States. i G a r Bay B B oe West Brighton O th Staten Borough c a e inden Br ls id a Park n ge Island F 440 l P a Stapleton t k b w u 278 s y h 95 . AFFORDABLE ALTERNATIVE TO MANHATTAN & BROOKLYN A v 278 lvd. Rosebank e Grasselli Victory B . no- aza . err ws Luxury apartment buildings in Jersey City offer an affordable alternative to py V ro 440 . S d Ex ar Be Marine e t a Islan N lt v t Bensonhurst e n ge Pk Park A d w ri y. d B n Gateway rental communities of a comparable quality in Manhattan and Brooklyn. Ac - o Grovesend Sheepshead Bay m National h Bay c Recreation A cording to REIS, Hudson County rents, which average approximately $2,842 per month as of Q2 2015, are well below those in Manhattan, which average $4,031 per month and Brooklyn, which average $3,245 per month. The spread in for-sale product is equally as dramatic as average condominium prices were approximately $1,600 psf in Manhattan and $825 psf in Brooklyn, during Q2 2015, while the average condominium sale price in Jersey City was approximately $650 psf. Further, brand-new luxury condos in these neighboring markets often sell for a premium of 50% to 100% higher than the average sales price per square foot. Conceptual Rendering IMPRESSIVE DEMOGRAPHICS The immediate area has shown very robust population growth as, within a one-mile radius of the Project, the overall population increased by 8.6% between 2000 and 2010, while at the same time, new household formation increased by an even more impressive 13.9%. The long-term strength of the area is further demonstrated by the continued population growth experienced between 2010 and 2015, with an overall increase of 7.1%. Furthermore, population growth is still projected to remain over 5.0% through 2020. At its current rate of growth, Jersey City is expected to overtake Newark as the largest city in New Jersey over the next twenty years. Average household incomes within a one-mile radius of the Project are also very strong and are estimated to be $104,000. NUMEROUS CONVENIENT TRANSPORTATION OPTIONS TO ENTIRE NEW YORK METROPOLITAN AREA The Project offers excellent connectivity to a variety of transportation options from its highly desirable location. Whether by train, bus, ferry, bicycle or car, the Project presents a seamless way for residents to commute to Manhattan, throughout the Gold Coast, or to destinations further afield. The Site is conveniently located near the Hoboken NJ Transit Commuter Rail station; the Hoboken and Newport PATH stations; the 2nd Street, New - port and Hoboken Light Rail stations; the Hoboken South ferry terminal and several NJ Transit bus routes. MARK A. DELILLO , Managing Partner JEFFREY D. BASTOW, Managing Director [email protected] • 212.381.7606 [email protected] • 212.381.7601 1450 Broadway, 30th Floor, New York, New York 10018 • Tel: 212.381.7612 • Fax: 917.591.9696.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Passaic River Navigation Update Outline
    LOWER PASSAIC RIVER COMMERCIAL NAVIGATION ANALYSIS United States Army Corps of Engineers New York District Original: March, 2007 Revision 1: December, 2008 Revision 2: July, 2010 ® US Army Corps of Engineers LOWER PASSAIC RIVER RESTORATION PROJECT COMMERCIAL NAVIGATION ANALYSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Study Background and Authority…………………………………………………1 2.0 Study Purpose……………..………………………………………………………1 3.0 Location and Study Area Description……………………………………………..4 4.0 Navigation & Maintenance Dredging History…………………………………….5 5.0 Physical Constraints including Bridges…………………………………………...9 6.0 Operational Information………………………………………………………….11 6.1 Summary Data for Commodity Flow, Trips and Drafts (1980-2006)…..12 6.2 Berth-by-Berth Analysis (1997-2006)…………………………………...13 7.0 Conclusions………………………………………………………………………26 8.0 References………………………………………………………………………..29 LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Dredging History………………………………………………………………...6 Table 2. Bridges on the Lower Passaic River……………………………………………..9 Table 3. Channel Reaches and Active Berths of the Lower Passaic River………………18 Table 4: Most Active Berths, by Volume (tons) Transported on Lower Passaic River 1997-2006………………………………………………………………………..19 Table 5: Summary of Berth-by-Berth Analysis, below RM 2.0, 1997-2006.....................27 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1a. Federal Navigation Channel (RMs 0.0 – 8.0)………………………………….2 Figure 1b. Federal Navigation Channel (RMs 8.0 – 15.4)………………………………...3 Figure 2. Downstream View of Jackson Street Bridge and the City of Newark, May 2007………………………………………………………………………………..5 Figure 3. View Upstream to the Lincoln Highway Bridge and the Pulaski Skyway, May 2007………………………………………………………………………………..8 Figure 4. View Upstream to the Point-No-Point Conrail Bridge and the NJ Turnpike Bridge, May 2007……………………………………………………………......10 Figure 5. Commodities Transported, Lower Passaic River, 1997-2006…………………12 Figure 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Passaic River Navigation Update Outline
    LOWER PASSAIC RIVER COMMERCIAL NAVIGATION ANALYSIS United States Army Corps of Engineers New York District Original: March, 2007 Revision 1: December, 2008 Revision 2: July, 2010 ® US Army Corps of Engineers LOWER PASSAIC RIVER RESTORATION PROJECT COMMERCIAL NAVIGATION ANALYSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Study Background and Authority…………………………………………………1 2.0 Study Purpose……………..………………………………………………………1 3.0 Location and Study Area Description……………………………………………..4 4.0 Navigation & Maintenance Dredging History…………………………………….5 5.0 Physical Constraints including Bridges…………………………………………...9 6.0 Operational Information………………………………………………………….11 6.1 Summary Data for Commodity Flow, Trips and Drafts (1980-2006)…..12 6.2 Berth-by-Berth Analysis (1997-2006)…………………………………...13 7.0 Conclusions………………………………………………………………………26 8.0 References………………………………………………………………………..29 LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Dredging History………………………………………………………………...6 Table 2. Bridges on the Lower Passaic River……………………………………………..9 Table 3. Channel Reaches and Active Berths of the Lower Passaic River………………18 Table 4: Most Active Berths, by Volume (tons) Transported on Lower Passaic River 1997-2006………………………………………………………………………..19 Table 5: Summary of Berth-by-Berth Analysis, below RM 2.0, 1997-2006.....................27 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1a. Federal Navigation Channel (RMs 0.0 – 8.0)………………………………….2 Figure 1b. Federal Navigation Channel (RMs 8.0 – 15.4)………………………………...3 Figure 2. Downstream View of Jackson Street Bridge and the City of Newark, May 2007………………………………………………………………………………..5 Figure 3. View Upstream to the Lincoln Highway Bridge and the Pulaski Skyway, May 2007………………………………………………………………………………..8 Figure 4. View Upstream to the Point-No-Point Conrail Bridge and the NJ Turnpike Bridge, May 2007……………………………………………………………......10 Figure 5. Commodities Transported, Lower Passaic River, 1997-2006…………………12 Figure 6.
    [Show full text]
  • CITY of JERSEY CITY 280 Grove Street Jersey City, New Jersey 07302
    CITY OF JERSEY CITY 280 Grove Street Jersey City, New Jersey 07302 Robert Byrnc, R.M.C., City Clerk Scan J. Gallagher, R.M.C, Deputy City Clerk Irene G. McNuIty, Deputy City Clerk Rolando R. Lavarro, Jr., Councilpcrson-at-Large Daniel Rivcra, Councilperson-;at-Largc Joyce E, Watterman, Coundlperson-at-Large Frank Gajewski, Cuuncilperson, Ward A John J. Hallanan, III, Councilperson, Ward B Richard Boggiano, Councilperson, Ward C Michael Yun, Councilperson, Ward D Candicc Osborne, Counciiperson, Ward E Diane Colcman, Councilpcrson, Ward F Agenda Regular Meeting of the Municipal Council Wednesday, September 14,2016 at 6:00 p.m. Please note: The next caucus meeting of Council is scheduled for Monday, September 26, 2016 at 5:30 p.m. in the Efrain Rosario Memorial Caucus Room, City Hall. The next regular meeting of Council is scheduled for Wednesday, September 28, 2016 at 6:00 p.m. in the Anna and Anthony R. Cucci Memorial Council Chambers, City Hall. A pre-meeting caucus may be held in the Efrain Rosario Memorial Caucus Room, City Hall. 1. (a) INVOCATION: (b) ROLL CALL: (c) SALUTE TO THE FLAG: (d) STATEMENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH SUNSHINE LAW: City Clerk Robert Byrne stated on behalf of the Municipal Council. "In accordance with the New Jersey P.L. 1975, Chapter 231 of the Open Public Meetings Act (Sunshine Law), adequate notice of this meeting was provided by mail and/or fax to The Jersey Journal and The Reporter. Additionally, the annual notice was posted on the bulletin board, first floor of City Hall and filed in the Office of the City Clerk on Wednesday, November 25, 2015, indicating the schedule of Meetings and Caucuses of the Jersey City Municipal Council for the calendar year 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Pulaski Skyway Corridor Rehabilitation Program Corridor Definition
    February 28, 2013 Pulaski Skyway Corridor Rehabilitation Program Corridor Definition Conrail Viaduct To Trenton To NYC Pulaski Skyyyway Viaduct East Approach . Pulaski Skyway is 3 ½ miles long . Direct Link to Holland Tunnel via Route 139 . Links Newark at Rayyyymond Blvd. & Jersey City at Tonnele Ave Circle . Broadway Ramp – southbound entrance, northbound exit to Jersey City . Kearny Ramp – southbound exit, northbound entrance to Kearny Superstructure Main Thru-Truss Deck Truss Multi-Girder Spans Thru-Truss (Span 20) Thru-Truss (Span 44) Substructure CtConcrete EEdncased Piers Reinforced Concrete Piers Substructure Steel Columns and Cross Frames Steel Bent Pier Existing Conditions Superstructure Vehicular Impact to Diagonal Member 100% Loss to South Truss Lacing Bars and Horizontal Legs of Bottom Angles Holed-Through Gusset Plate in Lower Chord Existing Condition Superstructure Up to 50% Section Loss Hanger Vertical Members Section Loss and Holes on Up to 100% Section Loss Hanger Floorbeam Member Existing Conditions Superstructure & Deck Components Hole in stringer with Holes in adjacent entire end panel web panels missing Existing Condition Substructure RifReinforced Concret e Abutments . Exposed and Rusted Reinforcing Steel . Concrete Delamination Exposed Bottom Flanges of Pier . Random Medium to Caps Exhibit Moderate Corrosion Wide Cracks and Efflorescence Existing Condition Substructure Reinforced Concrete Piers . Chipped and Split Concrete With Exposed Reinforcing Steel . Areas of Delamination . Vertical and Horizontal Cracks From 1///8 Inch to 1/4 Inch Wide Existing Condition Substructure Cracked Weld at Column / Pier Cap Connection Up to 50% Anchor Bolt Section Loss at Base of Column for Pier Bent Underlyyging Deck Condition Examples of severely deteriorated, cracked and patched concrete deck Interim Rehab/Repair Contracts $90M in interim construction projects: No.
    [Show full text]
  • Hudson Reporter - an Arts Venue Extraordinaire Mana Contemporary Brings Jersey City Into the Big Time 4/2/14 5:45 PM
    Hudson Reporter - An Arts Venue Extraordinaire Mana Contemporary brings Jersey City into the big time 4/2/14 5:45 PM Sign in Home News Sports Opinion Classifieds Entertainment Local Business Magazines Community Photos & Videos Contact Us April 2, 2014 Safari Power Saver Click to Start Weather Forecast Flash Plug-in An Arts Venue Extraordinaire Mana Contemporary brings Jersey City into the big time by Lauren Barbagallo Mar 21, 2014 | 366 views | 0 | 3 | | Mana Contemporary In 2011, in an unassuming stretch of industrial buildings right before the entrance to the Pulaski Skyway, a new creative business model for the art world was sprung. Mana Contemporary, at 888 Newark Ave., is the brainchild of artist and entrepreneur Eugene Lemay. With fellow artist and Mana founding partner Yigel Ozeri, he has quickly developed an anonymous patch of Journal Square into a world-class arts destination. Composed of warehouses that will eventually be connected via a Richard Meier-designed sculpture garden, Mana is a one-stop shop for the entire arts community. The professional, working artists who rent Mana’s spacious studios have access to in-house framing, crating, and shipping services—not to mention an artist-run foundry, a silkscreen studio, and a café and beer garden. It’s all part Mana’s mission to allow artists working in different media to collaborate, share ideas, and inspiration. For serious collectors, Mana provides ample space to store and even exhibit their prized collections among five view slideshow (5 images) galleries. There is also a custom-furniture design business for museums and galleries and a large glass building slated to host art fairs and large-scale installations.
    [Show full text]
  • Making Jersey City's Park System World Class
    MAKING JERSEY CITY’S PARK SYSTEM WORLD CLASS Jersey City has a very good park system, but it could be elite and truly world class. To take the next step up to that elite class will require boldness, creativity, and investment. By renovating existing parks, following through with the new parks that are in various stages of planning or development, completing the Hackensack and Hudson River walkways, and taking the audacious initiative to connect our waterfronts by a series of greenways will enrich the lives of our citizens and make Jersey City’s park system worthy of global attention. A Public Private Partnership for Nonstop Renovation Jersey City began the process of creating a parks master plan to rate the condition and then to renovate Jersey City’s 67 municipal parks a little over a decade ago. In 2008, after numerous public meetings and robust public input, a 10 year detailed plan to improve Jersey City’s park system was put in place that detailed every upgrade that every park needed and estimated the costs of these upgrades. Over the next several years, serious progress was seen. Ercel Webb Park in Ward F, Muhammad Ali and Bayview parks in Ward A, Hamilton Park in Ward E and Ward B’s Boyd McGuiness Park were all substantially improved under the plan. However, the City simply abandoned the plan shortly after Mayor Fulop took office, as he focused his attention, the City’s resources and public relations on just a couple of park improvements. Consequently, parks such as Pershing Field in the Heights have been left to deteriorate and plans to improve it have been shelved.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Jersey City Zoning
    Adopted APRIL 11, 2001 REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AREAS C 1 I T Amended OCTOBER 16, 2003 1 Armory Y 2 O Amended MARCH 10, 2004 2 Bates Street F N 3 O Amended APRIL 28, 2004 3 Bayfront I R T 4 H Amended JULY 15, 2004 4 Beacon B 5 E R Amended AUGUST 11, 2004 5 Beacon Avenue G 6 CITY OF JERSEY CITY E Amended SEPTEMBER 8, 2004 6 Betz Brewery N Amended OCTOBER 6, 20047 7 Block 239 Lot 47 Amended OCTOBER 27, 20048 8 Boland Street Amended FEBRUARY 9, 20059 9 Boyd McGuiness Park Amended MARCH 23, 200510 10 Bright Street Amended MAY 18, 200511 11 Bright and Varick re 12 n C ek Amended JUNE 22, 2005 12 Cambridge and North or h 13 n Amended SEPTEMBER 28, 2005 13 Canal Crossing Pe Amended NOVERMBER 18, 200514 14 Caven Point ZONING MAP 15 Amended FEBRUARY 22, 2006 15 Claremont 16 S Amended MARCH 22, 2006 16 Colgate U 17 UC CA Amended APRIL 12, 2006 17 Columbus Corner SE 18 F O Amended APRIL 26, 2006 18 Communipaw West Community Center N W 19 TO Amended MAY 24, 2006 19 Danforth Transit Village Amended JUNE 13, 200620 20 Dixon Crucible Amended SEPTEMBER 13, 200621 21 Droyers Point 22 ZONING DISTRICTS Amended OCTOBER 11, 2006 22 Exchange Place Amended JANUARY 24, 200723 23 Exchange Place North Amended FEBRUARY 14, 2007 24,25,26 24 Grand Jersey R-1 ONE AND TWO FAMILY HOUSING Amended FEBRUARY 15, 200727 25 Grand Street e U u Le N 28 n o IO e n N v ar Amended AUGUST 22, 2007 26 Green Villa d CI A St TY 29 R-1A ONE AND TWO FAMILY HOUSING e re l e e t Amended SEPTEMBER 11, 2007 27 Greenville Industrial n H n ag 30 o ue T St Amended MARCH 12, 2008 28 Gregory Park
    [Show full text]
  • 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS 2.1 History of Circulation in Jersey City 2.2
    Jersey City Master Plan / Circulation Element 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS As part of the background work in developing this Circulation Element, a detailed assessment of the history of circulation in Jersey City and an inventory of the baseline conditions of the City’s transportation system were prepared. 2.1 History of Circulation in Jersey City Photo Source: Jersey City Division of City Planning Strategically located on the Hudson River and with easy access to Upper New York Bay, the City of Jersey City was an important center for shipping and maritime activity during the peak of the industrial revolution of the early nineteenth century. This status was reinforced when the Morris Canal was completed at Jersey City in 1836, giving the City shared direct linkage with the Delaware River at Phillipsburg and with important inland points, such as Newark and Paterson. Jersey City continued to serve as a transit point between Upper New York Bay and inland points to the west, but as the industrial revolution progressed, new technologies enabled the development of newer, more efficient forms of transport than canals. Consequently, railroads followed and terminals were constructed along the Hudson River waterfront and other points in the City. One example is the historic Central Railroad of New Jersey Terminal, which originally opened in 1864 and is located in what is now Liberty State Park. With terminals located on the Hudson River, it was not long before ideas about a rail linkage to New York City began to evolve. This led to the construction of what is now known as the Port Authority Trans-Hudson (PATH) train, which commenced operations in 1907 after many arduous years of tunneling under the Hudson River.
    [Show full text]
  • All Aboard! One-Seat Rides to Manhattan Begin
    To New York: To Fanwood: 9:12 am 10:44 am 10:16 am 11:49 am 11:18 am 12:49 pm 12:18 pm 1:47 pm 1:16 pm 2:39 pm Customers board an NJT train in Fanwood, upper left; a new dual-power locomotive, lower right. All aboard! One-seat rides to Manhattan begin It’s starting out as a limited test, with just five off-peak If the test proves successful and New Jersey Transit trains scheduled in each direction, but with New Jersey expands the program, it could have a major e&ect on home Transit’s introduction of a one-seat ride in and out of New values in the borough. Local Realtor Pat Plante says she York’s Penn Station, many Fanwood and Raritan Valley Line often hears from clients that a one-seat ride into New York riders have a lot to smile about. See Trains, page 2 Initially, the one-seat rides are for trains arriving in Manhattan between 10 a.m. and 2 p.m. on weekdays, or Easter Egg Hunt set for April 12 trains to Fanwood between 11 a.m. and 3 p.m. No peak-hour, weekend or evening schedule one-seat service will be o&ered Forest Road Park will host Fanwood’s annual Easter Egg during the initial test period. Hunt on Saturday, April 12, at eggs-actly 10 A.M. The rain date is April 19, same time and place. For riders, it means a faster trip and no more guessing All children 10 and under are invited to meet the Easter games at Newark as they dash from one platform to another Bunny and join the fun! More than a thousand eggs filled to switch trains.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Tetrachlorodibenzodioxin
    *r-o<D er =o> 5" 5-0 STO._| 3 «• =- — o> =r ;- 3 3 <D S» • EAR BATCH COVER SHEET Establish an Administrative Record EPA HA * 542 Part I: Client Documents BATCH NTXBER Site Ka»e Site Number 542-0! Client Contact EPA or State Date Received front Client Received by ZM Date Returned to Client. Returned by__________ Part II: Microfilm Blovbacks Copy Set Kunber (Circle One)_ I 2_ t 3 QC of Copies by__________ Date o Part III: Coding Coded by_ _Date_ QC by __ Date Edit QC/Cnanges by_ Date_ Edit QC/Cnanges by_ _Dat«_ Edit QC/Cbanges by_ Date NOTICE: if the film Image is less clear than this notice, it Is due to the quality of the document being filmed DIA 002 %^^Sl3MiSll '.> ? E •i o*> \ 3 a o O(< =0 u £ ff\ 8° •o »t 11 c ft <£-|8 (0 &_X k. ti - •o • .C >» • * H? O 4J U b W • -.4 E 1 C - a. • 3*1 >T ' ••* ••* u <|) b W /v - * u a. u « ^33 5 j-a • •••» u M 4 U S 0 O 1 •H M 9S i £ u A o 4J ^V ») c M O 1 f-i B v ^^^ 5r~s u -o • 0 ^v \>vS 0 p (3 •H n '•*• 2 IM •*84 ^V^V \\ 7 • He ai • \ y< ^* t '•C* >Xv '*•• a£ IM Q Xb • H <J 0 M O b •-i • & • a. t) ti o 4 l/» a o a u II LJ O N • b C •-> « •H u 0 > 0 «* • « C -rt « • H u Ul o -a M •H I/I •-.
    [Show full text]
  • Redesign of Holland Tunnel Entrance and Exit Consolidation Study Tier II Screening and Feasibility Assessment
    Holland-RU4474 Redesign of Holland Tunnel Entrance and Exit Consolidation Study Tier II Screening and Feasibility Assessment FINAL REPORT December 2005 Submitted by Maria Boile* Assistant Professor Michail Golias* Jon A. Carnegie** Graduate Research Assistant AICP/PP, Assistant Director Chris Riale** James Greller** Graduate Research Assistant Project Manager * Center for Advanced Infrastruc ture & Transportation (CAIT) Civil & Environmental Engineering Department Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey Piscataway, NJ 08854-8014 ** Alan M. Voorhees Transportation Center Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey New Brunswick , NJ 08901 In cooperation with State of New Jersey Department of Transportation And U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Disclaimer Statement "The contents of this report reflect the views of the author(s) who is (are) responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the New Jersey Department of Transportation or the Federal Highway Administration. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation." The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the information presented herein. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the New Jersey Department of Transportation, in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof. TECHNICAL REPORT STANDARD TITLE PAGE 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. Holland-RU4474 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Redesign of Holland Tunnel Entrance and Exit Consolidation Study December2005 Tier II Screening and Feasibility Assessment 6.
    [Show full text]
  • NJ TRANSIT's Site Screening Analysis for NJ TRANSITGRID
    Appendix A: NJ TRANSIT’s Site Screening Analysis for NJ TRANSITGRID APPENDIX A: NJ TRANSIT’S SITE SCREENING ANALYSIS FOR NJ TRANSITGRID A.1 INTRODUCTION The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) and New Jersey Transit Corporation (NJ TRANSIT) will prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) and FTA’s regulations for implementing NEPA for the proposed NJ TRANSITGRID TRACTION POWER SYSTEM (the proposed Project). The proposed Project is a first of a kind microgrid designed to provide highly reliable power to support a core segment of NJ TRANSIT’s critical transportation services and infrastructure needs. As defined by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), a microgrid is a localized grouping of electricity sources and loads that normally operate connected to and synchronous with the traditional centralized grid, but can disconnect and function autonomously as physical and/or economic conditions dictate. The proposed Project will include an approximate 104-megawatt (MW)1 natural gas fired electric power generating plant (Main Facility) and associated infrastructure to provide traction power (i.e., the electricity needed to electrify railroad tracks) to enable trains to operate during widespread power failures on a portion of NJ TRANSIT and Amtrak systems, including some sections of the Amtrak Northeast Corridor (NEC) and NJ TRANSIT Morris & Essex Line, and the Hudson-Bergen Light Rail System. The proposed Project will also be designed to support non-traction loads including the signal system on a portion of the NJ TRANSIT Main Line (so that diesel trains can operate during power outages), signal systems at NJ TRANSIT Hudson-Bergen Light Rail Stations and at the NJ TRANSIT Hoboken Terminal, and other NJ TRANSIT signal power, tunnel ventilation, pumping, and lighting loads.
    [Show full text]