Why Has Aesthetic Formalism Fallen on Hard Times? David E.W

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Why Has Aesthetic Formalism Fallen on Hard Times? David E.W University of North Florida UNF Digital Commons Philosophy Faculty Publications Department of Philosophy Fall 2010 Why Has Aesthetic Formalism Fallen on Hard Times? David E.W. Fenner University of North Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unf.edu/aphi_facpub Part of the Esthetics Commons Recommended Citation Fenner, David E.W., "Why Has Aesthetic Formalism Fallen on Hard Times?" (2010). Philosophy Faculty Publications. 2. http://digitalcommons.unf.edu/aphi_facpub/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Philosophy at UNF Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Philosophy Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of UNF Digital Commons. For more information, please contact Digital Projects. © Fall 2010 All Rights Reserved Why Has Aesthetic Formalism Fallen on Hard Times? David E. W. Fenner University of North Florida 1. Introduction Nick Zangwill has done more than any person recently to resuscitate aesthetic formalism.1 I say ―resuscitate‖ because formalism has not been in favor for several decades. Zangwill writes that ―Aesthetic Formalism has fallen on hard times. At best it receives unsympathetic discussion and swift rejection. At worse it is the object of abuse and derision.‖2 The reasons many today believe aesthetic formalism is not viable have been the subject of discussion since the pendulum swing away from New Criticism, via the work of William Wimsatt, Cleanth Brooks, Clement Greenberg, André Levinson, and Heinrich Wolfflin. Most of these reasons have been discussed thoroughly, and those that I will review here that have been discussed I will spend little time reconsidering. I believe, though, that there are a few more reasons why formalism has fallen on hard times, reasons that have not been much discussed, or at least not directly. They are the subject of this article. While the history of aesthetics includes many formalists, some of a variety much less modest than the sort with whom Zangwill keeps company, I want to use as a baseline definition of formalism Zangwill‘s own. His definition of a formal aesthetic property begins with ―the intuitive idea that formal properties are those aesthetic properties that are directly perceivable or 1 Within the last few years, Nick Zangwill has revived interest in aesthetic formalism in a series of articles. One, Nick Zangwill, ―Feasible Aesthetic Formalism,‖ Nous 33, no. 4 (1999), pp. 610-29, lays out his positive case for formalism, making use of the Kantian model of free and dependent beauty as a departure point. A second, Nick Zangwill, ―In Defence of Moderate Aesthetic Formalism,‖ Philosophical Quarterly 50, no. 201 (October 2000), pp, 476-93, takes on a major position in opposition to his own, that of Kendall Walton as expressed in Kendall Walton, ―Categories of Art,‖ Philosophical Review 79 (1970), pp. 334-67. And a third, Nick Zangwill, ―Defusing Anti-Formalist Arguments,‖ British Journal of Aesthetics 40, no. 3 (July 2000), pp. 376-83, offers just what the title suggests. 2 Zangwill, ―Feasible Aesthetic Formalism,‖ p. 610. Reason Papers 32 (Fall 2010): 93-106. Copyright © 2010 Reason Papers Vol. 32 that are determined by properties that are directly perceivable.‖3 He defines a formal property this way: ―Formal properties are entirely determined by narrow nonaesthetic properties, whereas non-formal aesthetic properties are partly determined by broad nonaesthetic properties.‖4 And concerning narrow nonaesthetic properties, he states that ―the word ‗narrow‘ includes both sensory properties, non-relational physical properties, and also any dispositions to provoke responses that might be thought of to be partly constitutive of aesthetic properties.‖5 Zangwill defines himself as a modest formalist and, as the immediately preceding quotation suggests, he allows as appropriate to the constitution of an object‘s aesthetic character more than a less modest formalist (like Clive Bell) would. Since my aim in this article is to shed light on why aesthetic formalism has fallen on hard times, I am obliged to keep the discussion fluid enough to account for the breadth of formalism as an historical movement in aesthetics—or more specifically, three movements in the history of aesthetics: (1) formalism of the objective Platonic-Aristotelian variety; (2) formalism focused on securing freedom for artworks from social, religious, and moral criticism, as we find in the work of Roger Fry, Stuart Hampshire, and famously advocated by Oscar Wilde; and (3) formalism focused on delineation of what properly counts as an aesthetic property. This article is not a critique of Zangwill‘s formalism. Indeed, he has made a variety of moves, consonant with being a modest formalist, to account for some apparently relational properties as relevant to an aesthetic appraisal of objects, and this results in rendering his view far less a candidate for rejection than earlier views. Let‘s begin by reviewing some of the more popular reasons for the rejection of aesthetic formalism. 2. Reason One: Cognition-Inspiring Aspects of Twentieth-Century Modern Works of Art By and large, modern art does not lend itself to formalist critique; for many works, there is little of significant value to be found in them—like Readymades, Dada, and Pop Art—when viewed from such a perspective. So to the degree to which art theory should follow art, formalism, at least as a critical approach, gives way in the twentieth century to what for my purposes I call ―contextualism.‖ ―Contextualism‖ is the view that some non-formal properties, specifically, properties that provide an appropriate context (or 3 Ibid., p. 611. 4 Ibid. 5 Ibid. 94 Reason Papers Vol. 32 contexts) within which an object or event may be considered, are relevant to the constitution of that object‘s or event‘s aesthetic features (and so to its aesthetic merits).6 There are certainly those who advocate viewing objects such as Marcel Duchamp‘s Readymades from a formalist perspective, finding the aesthetic value of such works to lie in their formal aesthetic properties and crediting Duchamp with seeing in the ordinary aesthetic qualities more aesthetic merit than an audience more concerned with the functionality of Duchamp‘s ―finds‖ sees. Unfortunately, this perspective seems at odds with Duchamp‘s own artistic processes. Not to take anything away from his skill as a great painter, the challenge for which he has become famous is the elevation of ordinary objects to the status of works of art. If the objects he chose had hidden aesthetic depth, his challenge loses its heat. It becomes lukewarm and unworthy of the attention Duchamp (and others like Warhol and Rauschenberg) attracted. To consider a Readymade in line with Duchamp‘s artistic processes—but moreover to consider a Readymade in the context that affords it the greatest value, the greatest command of attention— is to view it not formally but rather as inspiration for cognition. 3. Reason Two: Representational Aspects of Works of Art Formalist critical approaches are, at least prima facie, unable to account adequately for the value of artworks when that value is tied to the representational content or aspects of those works.7 This is a species of a larger problem: formalism does not seem to have a place for properties of a relational nature. If we believe that a case for the aesthetic merits of an object (art or otherwise) includes reference to properties that speak to the representational relation between that object and some other, formalism does not have a place for this. The same can be said of historical relations.8 If we 6 This is discussed in David Fenner, Art in Context (Athens, OH: Ohio University Press, 2008). 7 Peter Kivy, ―Science and Aesthetic Appreciation,‖ Midwest Studies in Philosophy 16 (1991), pp. 180-95. On pp. 192 and 193, Kivy writes that ―the beauty of a scientific theory, like the overall artistic success of a realistic painting, is a function also of its representational success, which is to say, its truth. Once formalism is given up, the claim that, in theoretical sciences, the beautiful can never prevail over the true loses all appeal, if not all sense, for, of course, there never is a contest between beauty and truth in theoretical science, understood as the attempt to represent nature. It cannot represent nature beautifully, in the fullest sense, without representing it truthfully.‖ 8 I include with historical relations ―genetic‖ aspects of a work, that is, aspects connected to the artist and the context of her creation of the work. 95 Reason Papers Vol. 32 believe that the historical context of a work is relevant to a case for the aesthetic merit of that work, and aesthetic merit is evidenced on the presence of aesthetic properties, then one might claim that the aesthetic properties ―possessed‖ by the object in question transcend those ―directly perceivable or that are determined by properties that are directly perceivable.‖9 4. Reason Three: Expressive Aspects of Works of Art It is unclear that aesthetic formalism will adequately capture properties that are expressive in nature. Zangwill makes provision for this, but for other formalists, this problem is the same sort possessed by representational and historical considerations. The point regarding the rejection of formalism on the grounds that it does not capture expressive properties might be broadened. Some artists in creating their works may well mean to express perspectives on particular social issues, religious issues, or issues having to do with ethnicity, race, and gender. It is likely that objects viewed with these perspectives in mind, when these perspectives were meant to be expressed by artists through their works, will result in richer or at least deeper experiences for audience members. On many occasions, though, in the absence of knowing an artist‘s intentions (or sometimes in spite of knowing them), an audience member may inform her viewing act with a social-, religious-, ethnic-, or gender-oriented, etc.
Recommended publications
  • Formalism Or “The Regime of Truth”: a Reading of Adrienne Rich’S
    International Journal of Linguistics and Literature (IJLL) ISSN 2319-3956 Vol. 2, Issue 4, Sep 2013, 19-28 © IASET FORMALISM OR “THE REGIME OF TRUTH”: A READING OF ADRIENNE RICH’S A CHANGE OF WORLD NAHID MOHAMMADI Department of English Language and Literature, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran ABSTRACT Formalism in Adrienne Rich‟s first book, A Change of World, has attracted different critics and scholars so far. In their interpretations, it seems that they have taken it for granted that Adrienne Rich was a formalist. But none of them has ever presented the cause for the emergence of formalism in Adrienne Rich‟s early poetry. In this paper, I draw upon Michel Foucault‟s theory of “repressive power” and demonstrate that formalism was actually “the regime of truth” which determined „true/false‟ poetry for the young poet and excluded some poetic discourses and permitted only some particular ones to come into being in her first book. KEYWORDS: Adrienne Rich, A Change of World, Formalism, Michel Foucault, Discourse Analysis, Repressive Power, Exclusion, Truth, The Regime of Truth INTRODUCTION Almost all critics of Adrienne Rich‟s poetry agree that her early poems in A Change of World (1951) have been the poet‟s practice of distancing devices of modernist formalism which was dominant among the poets in the United States in the 1950s. Trudi Dawne Witonsky, who has examined Adrienne Rich‟s works in terms of Paulo Freire‟s theory of praxis1, admits that, in her early poetry, Rich wrote under the doctrine of New Critical formalism. She goes further and states that Rich‟s transition from formalism in her early poetry to feminism in her later volumes happens because of the „inadequacy of formalist‟ theory (Witonsky)2.
    [Show full text]
  • From Frames to Inference
    From Frames to Inference Nancy Chang, Srini Narayanan, and Miriam R.L. Petruck International Computer Science Institute 1947 Center St., Suite 600, Berkeley, CA 94704 nchang,miriamp,snarayan ¡ @icsi.berkeley.edu Abstract money ($1000) to another (Jerry) in exchange for some goods (a car) – but differ in the perspective This paper describes a computational they impose on the scene. formalism that captures structural rela- The shared inferential structure of verbs like buy tionships among participants in a dy- and sell is captured in FrameNet by the COMMERCE namic scenario. This representation is frame, which is associated with a set of situational used to describe the internal structure of roles, or frame elements (FEs), corresponding to FrameNet frames in terms of parameters event participants and props. These FEs are used for active event simulations. We apply our as annotation tags for sentences like those in (1), formalism to the commerce domain and yielding, for example: show how it provides a flexible means of handling linguistic perspective and other Buyer Goods challenges of semantic representation. (2) a. [Chuck] bought [a car] [from Jerry]Seller [for $1000]Payment. 1 Introduction b. [Jerry]Seller sold [a car]Goods [to Chuck]Buyer [for $1000]Payment. The development of lexical semantic resources is widely recognized as a prerequisite to progress in FE tags act as a shorthand that allows diverse verbs scalable natural language understanding. One of the to tap into a common subset of encyclopedic knowl- most semantically sophisticated efforts in this direc- edge. Moreover, regularities in the set of FEs real- tion is FrameNet (Baker et al., 1998; Fillmore et al., ized with specific lexical items can be taken as cor- 2001), an online lexical resource1 designed accord- related with their favored perspective.
    [Show full text]
  • Formalism and Realism in Ruins (Mapping the Logics of Collapse)
    University of Colorado Law School Colorado Law Scholarly Commons Articles Colorado Law Faculty Scholarship 2009 Formalism and Realism in Ruins (Mapping the Logics of Collapse) Pierre Schlag University of Colorado Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/articles Part of the Jurisprudence Commons, and the Law and Politics Commons Citation Information Pierre Schlag, Formalism and Realism in Ruins (Mapping the Logics of Collapse), 95 Iowa L. Rev. 195 (2009) (reprinted with permission), available at . Copyright Statement Copyright protected. Use of materials from this collection beyond the exceptions provided for in the Fair Use and Educational Use clauses of the U.S. Copyright Law may violate federal law. Permission to publish or reproduce is required. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Colorado Law Faculty Scholarship at Colorado Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by an authorized administrator of Colorado Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. +(,121/,1( Citation: 95 Iowa L. Rev. 195 2009-2010 Provided by: William A. Wise Law Library Content downloaded/printed from HeinOnline Thu Mar 2 17:47:48 2017 -- Your use of this HeinOnline PDF indicates your acceptance of HeinOnline's Terms and Conditions of the license agreement available at http://heinonline.org/HOL/License -- The search text of this PDF is generated from uncorrected OCR text. -- To obtain permission to use this article beyond the scope of your HeinOnline license, please use: Copyright Information Formalism and Realism in Ruins (Mapping the Logics of Collapse) PierreSchlag* ABSTRACT: After laying out a conventional account of the formalism vs.
    [Show full text]
  • AH 302: the Idea of the Aesthetic Syllabus Course Description Texts
    Fall 2020 AH 302: The Idea of the Aesthetic Syllabus The schedule of classes/readings is subject to change. Registered students should consult the syllabus on Google Classrooms, which will be kept updated. Instructor: Katalin Makkai Course times: Monday and Wednesday 15:45-17:15 Email: [email protected] Office hours: TBA Office: P98 004 Course description “Aesthetics” and “aesthetic” are terms that are often taken for granted inside as well as outside academic discourse. We speak of aesthetic experiences and judgments and qualities, and we employ “aesthetics” to designate the study of such matters. Although their root is taken from the Greek, the now-familiar terms (in their now-familiar usages) are, however, comparatively new. They are commonly regarded as having been introduced into the philosophical lexicon in the eighteenth century—a few hundred years ago. This course studies some of the texts that were key to the discovery, or perhaps the invention, of the “aesthetic”. What work was the idea meant to do? How did its evolution retain or reconfigure its original senses and purposes? Is the idea of the aesthetic problematic, ideological, or chimerical? Do we need an idea of the aesthetic to think about art? Texts All readings will be provided during the semester electronically and are to be brought to class as printouts. Electronic devices Students may not use any electronic devices (laptop, tablet, mobile phone) in the classroom, unless an accommodation letter has been issued. Requirements ACADEMIC INTEGRITY ​ ​ ​ Bard College Berlin maintains the staunchest regard for academic integrity and expects good academic practice from students in their studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Mechanism, Mentalism, and Metamathematics Synthese Library
    MECHANISM, MENTALISM, AND METAMATHEMATICS SYNTHESE LIBRARY STUDIES IN EPISTEMOLOGY, LOGIC, METHODOLOGY, AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Managing Editor: JAAKKO HINTIKKA, Florida State University Editors: ROBER T S. COHEN, Boston University DONALD DAVIDSON, University o/Chicago GABRIEL NUCHELMANS, University 0/ Leyden WESLEY C. SALMON, University 0/ Arizona VOLUME 137 JUDSON CHAMBERS WEBB Boston University. Dept. 0/ Philosophy. Boston. Mass .• U.S.A. MECHANISM, MENT ALISM, AND MET AMA THEMA TICS An Essay on Finitism i Springer-Science+Business Media, B.V. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Webb, Judson Chambers, 1936- CII:J Mechanism, mentalism, and metamathematics. (Synthese library; v. 137) Bibliography: p. Includes indexes. 1. Metamathematics. I. Title. QA9.8.w4 510: 1 79-27819 ISBN 978-90-481-8357-9 ISBN 978-94-015-7653-6 (eBook) DOl 10.1007/978-94-015-7653-6 All Rights Reserved Copyright © 1980 by Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht Originally published by D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland in 1980. Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 1980 No part of the material protected by this copyright notice may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any informational storage and retrieval system, without written permission from the copyright owner TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE vii INTRODUCTION ix CHAPTER I / MECHANISM: SOME HISTORICAL NOTES I. Machines and Demons 2. Machines and Men 17 3. Machines, Arithmetic, and Logic 22 CHAPTER II / MIND, NUMBER, AND THE INFINITE 33 I. The Obligations of Infinity 33 2. Mind and Philosophy of Number 40 3. Dedekind's Theory of Arithmetic 46 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Art, Clive Bell
    PHI 3240: Philosophy of Art Session 3 September 9th, 2015 Matisse, Henri. (1905) Luxe, Calme, et Volupte. Collingwood & Bell on the Ontology of Art 1 Today we officially begin a unit on the ontology of art, Ø the attempt to answer the question “What is art?” Ø This question is ambiguous. Is it asking: • What is the nature of artworks?, or • What is the nature of the practice of art? Ø We are going to read these authors as if they are answering the question as a claim about artworks. Before discussing Collingwood’s & Bell’s answers, let’s consider a theoretical predecessor. • The earliest views about art we have on record are mimetic, or representational theories: – these say that artworks mimic & depict images/events from the real world. • As Shakespeare’s Hamlet says about plays, artworks were understood to “hold as ‘twere the ‘play within a play’ the mirror up to nature” (Act 3, Scene 2) in Hamlet 2 Representational views were common among the ancient Greeks (e.g. Plato), • and popularized in 18th century Europe (especially by Charles Batteaux, in “The Fine Arts Reduced to a Common Principle” (trans. from French) Why have representational theories of art fallen out of favor? Greek sculpture, Fragonard, Jean-Honoré. nd Ø There are tons of counterexamples 2 -century B.C. (1772) The Reader. to the view, e.g.: – visual artworks which don’t clearly depict any recognizable objects or events (beginning in 1800s), – and purely instrumental music (e.g., symphonies) without lyrics or guiding narratives. • Mozart’s #40 in G Minor (1788): bit.ly/1O2GbSp Turner, Joseph Mallord William.
    [Show full text]
  • Aesthetic Formalism, Reactions and Solutions
    Hekmat va Falsafe (Wisdom and Philosophy) vol.6, no.4, 2011, pp. 101-112 Aesthetic Formalism, Reactions and Solutions Khosrow Bagheri Noaparast Mohammad Zoheir Bagheri Noaparast Abstract It seems necessary to introduce the basic concepts used in this article i.e. formalism, anti-formalism and moderate formalism. Formalists believe that the aesthetic appreciation of an artwork generally involves an attentive awareness of its sensory or perceptual qualities and does not require knowledge about its non-perceptual properties. Anti-formalists on the other hand hold that none of the aesthetic properties in a work of art are formal. A number of philosophers have recently advocated a more moderate formalism. According to this view, although not all aesthetic qualities are formal, many are, and some artworks possess only formal aesthetic qualities. The quarrel among these three rival views concerns what sort of knowledge, if any, is required for appropriate aesthetic appreciation of an artwork. In what follows, we will give a brief exposition of these three viewpoints. Subsequently, we will give our preferred position with regard to these views. Keywords: Aesthetic formalism, anti-formalism, aesthetics, Nick Zangwill. 101 1. Formalism, anti-formalism and moderate formalism Before getting involved with the details of the three viewpoints, it seems necessary to introduce the notions of aesthetic and non-aesthetic properties and formal and non- formal properties. Observable properties are properties that can make a difference in our perceptual experience of the artwork. In contrast, non-observable properties refer to instances such as the artist‟s intention, the artist‟s love life, the artist‟s mental health, the artwork‟s history.
    [Show full text]
  • The Significance and Insignificance of Clive Bell's Formalism I
    Navorsingsartikels/Research articles The significance and insignificance of Clive Bell’s formalism i Johan Snyman Dept, of Philosophy Rand Afrikaans University JOHANNESBURG Abstract Clive Bell coined the phrase significant form. The way he initially defined the phrase and the way he implemented it were two different matters. In this article Bell's procedure is analysed as a characteristic of late moder­ nist aesthetics, i.e. an attempt to come to terms with the challenge o f the radically new in art. It is suggested that one should bear in mind that formalism in this sense is a theory of artistic material which explains how meaning is communicated and perceived through non-discursive qualities o f the artistic material. That is the relevance o f Susanne K. Longer's re- interpretation o f Bell's phrase. 1. Introduction Clive Bell’s aesthetics does not make for profound reading. Why bother then? The least one can say is that Bell contributed towards the modem aesthetic vocabulary by coining a phrase that has since become a cliché or hackneyed for that matter, viz. significant form. On the other hand, if one reflects from a distance on the Wirkungsgeschichte of Bell’s phrase as well as on the Wirkungs- geschichte of the problem he wanted to solve, significant form has an intriguing logic. Significant form as an aesthetic category has spawned quite a generation of related concepts, from Clive Bell to Susanne K. Langer’s unconsummated symbol, up to Nelson Goodman’s languages of art (Goodman, 1976), Peter A revised version of a paper read at a 2nd International Symposium on Formalism, organized by the Slovenian Society of Aesthetics in Ljubljana, 14-17 May 1992.
    [Show full text]
  • A Formalism for Argument Over Rules of Inference
    Tenacious Tortoises: A Formalism for Argument over Rules of Inference Peter McBurney and Simon Parsons Department of Computer Science University of Liverpool Liverpool L69 7ZF U.K. g fP.J.McBurney,S.D.Parsons @csc.liv.ac.uk May 31, 2000 Abstract Eighty years later, philosopher Susan Haack [9] took up the question of how one justifies the use of MP as a As multi-agent systems proliferate and employ different deductive rule of inference. If one does so by means of and more sophisticated formal logics, it is increasingly examples of its valid application, then this is in essence likely that agents will be reasoning with different rules a form of induction, which (as she remarks) seems too of inference. Hence, an agent seeking to convince an- weak a means of justification for a rule of deduction. If, other of some proposition may first have to convincethe on the other hand, one uses a deductive means of justi- latter to use a rule of inference which it has not thus far fication, such as demonstrating the preservation of truth adopted. We define a formalism to represent degrees across the inference step in a truth-table, one risks us- of acceptability or validity of rules of inference, to en- ing the very rule being justified. So how can one person able autonomous agents to undertake dialogue concern- convince another of the validity of a rule of deductive ing inference rules. Even when they disagree over the inference? acceptability of a rule, two agents may still use the pro- That rules of inference may be the subject of fierce posed formalism to reason collaboratively.
    [Show full text]
  • Are We Teaching High Art Or Low Art?
    CHAPTER 7 ARE WE TEACHING HIGH ART OR LOW ART? We are apt to call barbarous whatever departs widely from our own tatse and apprehension; but some find the epithet of reproach retorted on us. (Hume, 1965, p. 3) References to high-art notions span the globe. Centuries of continuous and changing conceptions of high art have involved, for example: ideas about the grand and the common, the technical study of its rhetoric concerns, its indifferent morality or lack of any firm moral basis to it, its notions of beauty, perfectionism, emotion, idealism, formalism, the sublime, taste, academic painting and correctness, can be found in the work of Homer, Aeschylus, Aristophanes, Sophocles, Plato, Aristotle, Longinus, Joshua Reynolds, David Hume and Clive Bell. So consequently, we are sometimes asked in art education whether the art we are teaching is: ‘high art’ rather than ‘low art’, ‘high culture rather than low culture’, ‘high art rather than popular art’, ‘high art rather than student-centered art’. What are all these different distinctions with ‘high’ and ‘low’ in them segregating? What are their contrasts? Can we segregate what we teach in art in these ways and ought we to do so? ‘High art’ is poor art if, as Marcel Proust satirically mocks, we confuse art with ‘high society’, ‘social ambition’ and ‘special friendships in the art world’ (Proust, 2001, p. 59–67). Proust was aware that in the history of art no continent, nation and single group of people have a monopoly over what is ‘high art’. The above terms with ‘high’ and ‘low’ in them certainly imply a clash of ideas about teaching in art, but if so, why should popular teenage music necessarily clash with classical instrumental music, since on the one hand classical music can perform in instrumental ways Beatles songs rather well, and popular music can have instrumental orchestral influences that can benefit its music interest.
    [Show full text]
  • The Place of Formalism in Legal Theory, 70 N.C
    NORTH CAROLINA LAW REVIEW Volume 70 | Number 5 Article 4 6-1-1992 The lP ace of Formalism in Legal Theory Michael Corrado Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.unc.edu/nclr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Michael Corrado, The Place of Formalism in Legal Theory, 70 N.C. L. Rev. 1545 (1992). Available at: http://scholarship.law.unc.edu/nclr/vol70/iss5/4 This Comments is brought to you for free and open access by Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in North Carolina Law Review by an authorized administrator of Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ESSAY THE PLACE OF FORMALISM IN LEGAL THEORY MICHAEL CORRADO* I understand formalism to be the claim that law is an autonomous area of knowledge. To say that it is autonomous is to say that it is self- contained, that it is not dependent on other areas of knowledge like mo- rality or politics or sociology. In particular it is to say that law is not reducible to those other areas, in a sense of reducibility I will try to make clear. There is a version of formalism that is true. This version of formal- ism does not claim that law is unrelated to other areas of knowledge. It admits that legal argument makes use of moral, political, and sociologi- cal information. But it insists that, although much that is extra-legal is taken into account in deciding a question of law, it remains extra-legal; it does not become part of the law.' I.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mosaic of Aesthetics: the Manifestation of Clive Bell's and Roger Fry's Theories in the Waves
    Criterion: A Journal of Literary Criticism Volume 13 Issue 1 Winter Article 8 4-2020 The Mosaic of Aesthetics: The Manifestation of Clive Bell's and Roger Fry's Theories in The Waves Nina Katarina Štular Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/criterion Part of the English Language and Literature Commons BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Štular, Nina Katarina (2020) "The Mosaic of Aesthetics: The Manifestation of Clive Bell's and Roger Fry's Theories in The Waves," Criterion: A Journal of Literary Criticism: Vol. 13 : Iss. 1 , Article 8. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/criterion/vol13/iss1/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Criterion: A Journal of Literary Criticism by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. The Mosaic of Aesthetics The Manifestation of Clive Bell’s and Roger Fry’s Aesthetic Theories in The Waves Nina Katarina Štular In Roger Fry’s “An Essay in Aesthetics,” published in 1909, he explores the question of what art truly is. A year after the paper’s publication, Fry met Clive Bell on a train and they struck a conversation about aesthetics that marked the beginning of Fry’s life-long friendship with the Bloomsbury group—a group that gave home to many influential modernist thinkers and writers. The aesthetic theory that Fry explains in “An Essay in Aesthetics” influenced Bell’sArt , published in 1914, which in turn affected Fry’s Vision and Design, published in 1920, in which Fry fully elaborates his aesthetic theory.
    [Show full text]