DOCSLIB.ORG

STUDENT UNDERSTANDING of SOIL CLASSIFICATION USING the SIMPLIFIED GUIDE to SOIL TAXONOMY by KIM KERSCHEN B.S., Kansas State Univ

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
STUDENT UNDERSTANDING of SOIL CLASSIFICATION USING the SIMPLIFIED GUIDE to SOIL TAXONOMY by KIM KERSCHEN B.S., Kansas State Univ STUDENT UNDERSTANDING OF SOIL CLASSIFICATION USING THE SIMPLIFIED GUIDE TO SOIL TAXONOMY by KIM KERSCHEN B.S., Kansas State University, 2012 A THESIS submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF SCIENCE Department of Agronomy College of Agriculture KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Manhattan, Kansas 2014 Approved by: Major Professor Michel D. Ransom Copyright KIM JANAY KERSCHEN 2014 Abstract Soil Taxonomy is the official soil classification system used in the United States and many other countries. Any soil in the world can be classified from the order to the family level using a set of classification keys that are currently in an eleventh edition. The classification system is quite complex and can be too complicated for beginning soil science students to understand and use. Thus, a national advisory working group of the National Cooperative Soil Survey developed an abbreviated guide called the Simplified Guide to Soil Taxonomy. The goal of the simplified guide is to help reduce the complexity of soil taxonomy and aid in the classification of soils from the order to the great group level. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the simplified guided when used by students in soil science courses to classify soils as compared to traditional methods using the more detailed keys. Classes at Kansas State University were used in the study and included the laboratory sections of AGRON 305 (Soils) and AGRON 515 (Soil Genesis and Classification). Student learning was evaluated using pre and post-test scores, assignments, and evaluation surveys. Results from the fall and spring semesters of AGRON 305 vary based on pre and post test scores and the assignment. Written evaluations indicated that both methods were easy to understand, especially as the lab progressed, but students responded more favorably to the abbreviated descriptions of taxa, pictures, and hyperlinks associated with the simplified guide. The Simplified Guide to Soil Taxonomy can be used in introductory soils courses. However, it is more suited for mid to upper level soil science courses, such as AGRON 515, where students responded favorably to the shorter and more comprehensible descriptions of taxa at the order, suborder, and great group level. Table of Contents List of Figures ................................................................................................................................ vi List of Tables ................................................................................................................................ vii Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................ ix Dedication ....................................................................................................................................... x Chapter 1 - Introduction .................................................................................................................. 1 Study Objectives ......................................................................................................................... 2 Chapter 2 - Literature Review ......................................................................................................... 3 Background on Soil Classification ............................................................................................. 3 Why Classify Soils? ................................................................................................................ 5 Background on Student Learning ............................................................................................... 6 Figures ........................................................................................................................................ 9 Chapter 3 - Teaching with the Simplified Guide to Soil Taxonomy .............................................. 11 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 11 Materials and Methods .............................................................................................................. 11 Background on AGRON 305 (Soils) .................................................................................... 11 Background on AGRON 515 (Soil Genesis and Classification) .......................................... 12 Description of the Research Process for AGRON 305 (Soils) ............................................. 12 Procedure for AGRON 305 (Soils) ....................................................................................... 14 Description of the Research Process for AGRON 515 (Soil Genesis and Classification) ... 15 Procedure for AGRON 515 (Soil Genesis and Classification) ............................................. 16 Data Analysis ........................................................................................................................ 17 Results and Discussion ............................................................................................................. 17 Results from AGRON 305 (Soils) ........................................................................................ 17 Results from AGRON 515 (Soil Genesis and Classification) .............................................. 22 Conclusions ............................................................................................................................... 23 AGRON 305 (Soils) .............................................................................................................. 23 AGRON 515 (Soil Genesis and Classification) .................................................................... 25 Limitations of the Study ........................................................................................................ 26 iv Recommendation for Further Research ................................................................................ 27 Final Thoughts ...................................................................................................................... 27 References ................................................................................................................................. 28 Figures and Tables .................................................................................................................... 31 Appendix A - Pre- and Post-test for AGRON 305 (Soils) ............................................................ 49 Appendix B - Example Pedon Data for AGRON 305 (Soils) ...................................................... 50 Appendix C - Soil Classification Assignment for AGRON 305 (Soils) ....................................... 52 Appendix D - Simplified Key in Textbook used in AGRON 305 (Soils) .................................... 54 Appendix E - Evaluation Survey for AGRON 305 (Soils) ........................................................... 55 Appendix F - Example Pedon Data for AGRON 515 (Soil Genesis and Classification) ............. 58 Appendix G - Homework 1 Assignment for AGRON 515 (Soil Genesis and Classification) ..... 85 Appendix H - Homework 2 Assignment for AGRON 515 (Soil Genesis and Classification) ..... 86 Appendix I - Homework 3 Assignment for AGRON 515 (Soil Genesis and Classification)....... 87 Appendix J - Evaluation Survey for AGRON 515 (Soil Genesis and Classification) .................. 89 Appendix K - Supplemental Horizon Nomenclature Handout from Textbook for AGRON 305 (Soils) ..................................................................................................................................... 91 Appendix L - Example Flow Chart, Maps, and Picture from the Simplified Guide to Soil Taxonomy ............................................................................................................................... 92 v List of Figures Figure 2.1 The Information Processing Model explains how the brain processes information from the environment (Sousa, 2011, pg. 43). .................................................................................. 9 Figure 2.2 The probability of an individual to store new information varies depending on the presence of sense and/or meaning (Sousa, 2011, pg. 53). .................................................... 10 Figure 3.1 Self-reported prior knowledge of soil classification by student in AGRON 305 (Soils). ............................................................................................................................................... 31 Figure 3.2 Breakdown of “No” responses in AGRON 305 (Soils) to the question “I was able to determine the diagnostic subsurface horizons of the given pedons.” The majority of students responding “No” did not have a supplemental horizon nomenclature handout to help with classification. ........................................................................................................................ 32 vi List of Tables Table 3.1 Distribution of teachers, methods, and total number of students for AGRON 305 (Soils) laboratory sections ..................................................................................................... 33 Table 3.2 Learning outcomes for AGRON 305 (Soils) developed based on Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy as described by Sousa (2011) ............................................................................. 34 Table 3.3 Change in pre- and post-test scores for AGRON 305 (Soils) ......................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • NRCS Keys to Soil Taxonomy
    United States Department of Agriculture Keys to Soil Taxonomy Ninth Edition, 2003 Keys to Soil Taxonomy By Soil Survey Staff United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service Ninth Edition, 2003 The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at 202-720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call 202-720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Cover: A natric horizon with columnar structure in a Natrudoll from Argentina. 5 Table of Contents Foreword .................................................................................................................................... 7 Chapter 1: The Soils That We Classify.................................................................................. 9 Chapter 2: Differentiae for Mineral Soils and Organic Soils ............................................... 11 Chapter 3: Horizons and Characteristics Diagnostic for the Higher Categories .................
    [Show full text]
  • Keys to Soil Taxonomy
    United States Department of Agriculture Keys to Soil Taxonomy Ninth Edition, 2003 Keys to Soil Taxonomy By Soil Survey Staff United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service Ninth Edition, 2003 The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at 202-720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call 202-720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Cover: A natric horizon with columnar structure in a Natrudoll from Argentina. 5 Table of Contents Foreword .................................................................................................................................... 7 Chapter 1: The Soils That We Classify.................................................................................. 9 Chapter 2: Differentiae for Mineral Soils and Organic Soils ............................................... 11 Chapter 3: Horizons and Characteristics Diagnostic for the Higher Categories .................
    [Show full text]
  • The Sharpshooter the Chetco Effect
    1 The Sharpshooter Oregon Society of Soil Scientists Quarterly Newsletter Summer 2019 The Chetco Effect Table of Contents OSSS Summer Tour Page 1 September 12-13th Summer Tour Page 2 The Oregon Society of Soil Scientists is Note from the Editor making an excursion to Oregon’s Scholarships “Banana Belt “ for our summer field Poem tour, hosted in cooperation with our friends at the Northwest Forest Soils Pages 3 Council! Spend two days with fellow Soilweb! soils professionals and enthusiasts as we explore diverse landscapes on the Page 4-5 Rogue River-Siskiyou National For- Arctic Soil Survey est. We’ll hear from members of the Forest’s Burned Area Emergency Re- Pages 7-8 sponse (BAER) Team to learn about Featured Article how soils are affected by fire and drive watershed response. We’ll also learn how local land managers are re- sponding to a diverse array of resource concerns in the wake of the fire. Potential field topics include soil burn severity mapping, salvage log- ging, protection of critical infrastructure, management of noxious weeds and rare plant communities, and forest management for insects and dis- ease. And, of course there will be soil profiles! We will camp out along the stunning Chetco River at Alfred Loeb State Park. We will see and discuss impacts of the Chetco Bar fire on soils and ecosystems and the strategies land managers employ to reduce the im- pacts of wildfire. We will also see some absolutely glorious flora, geology, and soils; including coastal redwoods, peridotites, and serpentinitic soils. Visit the Oregon Society of Registration is currently live and can be found at Soil Scientists @ https:// https://www.oregonsoils.org/upcoming-meetings/event-registration/ www.oregonsoils.org/ contact/ 1 Editors note - Sharpshooter Annals By Vance Almquist A poem by Randy Hinson, Spring ed.
    [Show full text]
  • Soil Lacquer Peel DIY: Simply Capturing Beauty Cathelijne R
    SOIL Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-2018-27 Manuscript under review for journal SOIL Discussion started: 1 November 2018 c Author(s) 2018. CC BY 4.0 License. Soil lacquer peel DIY: simply capturing beauty Cathelijne R. Stoof1, Jasper H.J. Candel1, Laszlo van der Wal1, Gert Peek1 1 Soil Geography and Landscape Group, Wageningen University, PO Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands Correspondence to: Cathelijne R. Stoof ([email protected]) 5 Abstract. Visualization can greatly benefit understanding of concepts and processes, which in soil science and geology can be done using real life snapshots of soils and sediments in lacquer peels and glue peels. While it may seem complicated, anyone can make such a soil peel for use in classrooms, public places, homes and offices for teaching, outreach, decoration and awareness. Technological development has considerably simplified the making of soil peels, but this methodological innovation has not been described in the literature. Here, we report on a thoroughly tested and simple method for taking peels 10 of sandy soils using readily available tools and materials. Our method follows the main previously published steps of preparing a soil face, impregnating the soil face with a fixation agent in the field, extracting the resulting peel and mounting it on a wooden panel. Yet instead of using lacquers and thinning agents, we use strong though flexible contact adhesive (glue), which has the major advantage that it no longer requires use and mixing of toxic chemicals in the field or reinforcement of the peel to prevent breaking. Moreover, the preservation potential is much higher than with the old method.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dokuchaev Hypothesis As a Basis for Predictive Digital Soil Mapping (On the 125Th Anniversary of Its Publication) I
    ISSN 10642293, Eurasian Soil Science, 2012, Vol. 45, No. 4, pp. 445–451. © Pleiades Publishing, Ltd., 2012. Original Russian Text © I.V. Florinsky, 2012, published in Pochvovedenie, 2012, No. 4, pp. 500–506. HISTORY OF SCIENCE The Dokuchaev Hypothesis as a Basis for Predictive Digital Soil Mapping (On the 125th Anniversary of Its Publication) I. V. Florinsky Institute of Mathematical Problems of Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Pushchino, Moscow oblast, 142290 Russia Email: [email protected] Received June 16, 2011; in final form, September 25, 2011 Abstract—Predictive digital soil mapping is widely used in soil science. Its objective is the prediction of the spatial distribution of soil taxonomic units and quantitative soil properties via the analysis of spatially distrib uted quantitative characteristics of soilforming factors. Western pedometrists stress the scientific priority and principal importance of Hans Jenny’s book (1941) for the emergence and development of predictive soil mapping. In this paper, we demonstrate that Vasily Dokuchaev explicitly defined the central idea and state ment of the problem of contemporary predictive soil mapping in the year 1886. Then, we reconstruct the his tory of the soil formation equation from 1899 to 1941. We argue that Jenny adopted the soil formation equa tion from Sergey Zakharov, who published it in a wellknown fundamental textbook in 1927. It is encouraging that this issue was clarified in 2011, the anniversary year for publications of Dokuchaev and Jenny. DOI: 10.1134/S1064229312040047 INTRODUCTION additional soil formers may be included in Eq. (2). In soil science, predictive digital soil mapping has McBratney et al.
    [Show full text]
  • John Day Fossil Beds NM: Geology and Paleoenvironments of the Clarno Unit
    John Day Fossil Beds NM: Geology and Paleoenvironments of the Clarno Unit JOHN DAY FOSSIL BEDS Geology and Paleoenvironments of the Clarno Unit John Day Fossil Beds National Monument, Oregon GEOLOGY AND PALEOENVIRONMENTS OF THE CLARNO UNIT John Day Fossil Beds National Monument, Oregon By Erick A. Bestland, PhD Erick Bestland and Associates, 1010 Monroe St., Eugene, OR 97402 Gregory J. Retallack, PhD Department of Geological Sciences University of Oregon Eugene, OR 7403-1272 June 28, 1994 Final Report NPS Contract CX-9000-1-10009 TABLE OF CONTENTS joda/bestland-retallack1/index.htm Last Updated: 21-Aug-2007 http://www.nps.gov/history/history/online_books/joda/bestland-retallack1/index.htm[4/18/2014 12:20:25 PM] John Day Fossil Beds NM: Geology and Paleoenvironments of the Clarno Unit (Table of Contents) JOHN DAY FOSSIL BEDS Geology and Paleoenvironments of the Clarno Unit John Day Fossil Beds National Monument, Oregon TABLE OF CONTENTS COVER ABSTRACT ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION AND REGIONAL GEOLOGY INTRODUCTION PREVIOUS WORK AND REGIONAL GEOLOGY Basement rocks Clarno Formation John Day Formation CHAPTER II: GEOLOGIC FRAMEWORK INTRODUCTION Stratigraphic nomenclature Radiometric age determinations CLARNO FORMATION LITHOSTRATIGRAPHIC UNITS Lower Clarno Formation units Main section JOHN DAY FORMATION LITHOSTRATIGRAPHIC UNITS Lower Big Basin Member Middle and upper Big Basin Member Turtle Cove Member GEOCHEMISTRY OF LAVA FLOW AND TUFF UNITS Basaltic lava flows Geochemistry of andesitic units Geochemistry of tuffs STRUCTURE OF CLARNO
    [Show full text]
  • This File Was Created by Scanning the Printed Publication
    This file was created by scanning the printed publication. Text errors identified by the software have been corrected; however, some errors may remain. Editors SHARON E. CLARKE is a geographer and GIS analyst, Department of Forest Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331; and SANDRA A. BRYCE is a biogeographer, Dynamac Corporation, Environmental Protection Agency, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Western Ecology Division, Corvallis, OR 97333. This document is a product of cooperative research between the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service; the Forest Science De- partment, Oregon State University; and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Cover Artwork Cover artwork was designed and produced by John Ivie. Abstract Clarke, Sharon E.; Bryce, Sandra A., eds. 1997. Hierarchical subdivisions of the Columbia Plateau and Blue Mountains ecoregions, Oregon and Washington. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-395. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 114 p. This document presents two spatial scales of a hierarchical, ecoregional framework and provides a connection to both larger and smaller scale ecological classifications. The two spatial scales are subregions (1:250,000) and landscape-level ecoregions (1:100,000), or Level IV and Level V ecoregions. Level IV ecoregions were developed by the Environmental Protection Agency because the resolution of national-scale ecoregions provided insufficient detail to meet the needs of state agencies for estab- lishing biocriteria, reference sites, and attainability goals for water-quality regulation. For this project, two ecoregions—the Columbia Plateau and the Blue Mountains— were subdivided into more detailed Level IV ecoregions.
    [Show full text]
  • History of East European Chernozem Soil Degradation; Protection and Restoration by Tree Windbreaks in the Russian Steppe
    Sustainability 2015, 7, 705-724; doi:10.3390/su7010705 OPEN ACCESS sustainability ISSN 2071-1050 www.mdpi.com/journal/sustainability Article History of East European Chernozem Soil Degradation; Protection and Restoration by Tree Windbreaks in the Russian Steppe Yury G. Chendev 1, Thomas J. Sauer 2,*, Guillermo Hernandez Ramirez 3 and Charles Lee Burras 4 1 Department of Natural Resources Management and Land Cadastre, Belgorod State University, Belgorod 308015, Russia; E-Mail: [email protected] 2 USDA-ARS, National Laboratory for Agriculture and the Environment, Ames, IA 50011, USA 3 Department of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R3, Canada; E-Mail: [email protected] 4 Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-515-294-3416; Fax: +1-515-294-8125. Academic Editor: Marc A. Rosen Received: 30 October 2014 / Accepted: 29 December 2014 / Published: 8 January 2015 Abstract: The physiographic region of the Central Russian Upland, situated in the Central part of Eastern Europe, is characterized by very fertile grassland soils—Chernozems (Mollisols in the USDA taxonomy). However, over the last several centuries this region has experienced intense land-use conversion. The most widespread and significant land-use change is the extensive cultivation of these soils. As a result, Chernozems of the region that were some of the most naturally fertile soils in the world with thick A horizons had become, by the second half of the 19th century, weakly productive, with decreased stocks of organic matter.
    [Show full text]
  • Edifisols—A New Soil Unit of Technogenic Soils
    J Soils Sediments DOI 10.1007/s11368-014-0983-4 SOILS AND SEDIMENTS IN URBAN AND MINING AREAS Edifisols—a new soil unit of technogenic soils Przemysław Charzyński & Piotr Hulisz & Renata Bednarek & Agnieszka Piernik & Marta Winkler & Marcin Chmurzyński Received: 7 January 2014 /Accepted: 10 September 2014 # The Author(s) 2014. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract contamination. The results of the statistical analysis Purpose A very specific type of urban soils forms on build- showed that climate was not a key factor in differenti- ings. They are developed from or on technogenic substrates. ation of the studied soils. The properties of Edifisols are This work was conducted to assess properties of Edifisols linked to their position on the buildings. Edifisols in occurring in different regions of Europe and northwest concave forms differ from those located on vertical and Africa. Proposals are made for the terminology used and the horizontal surfaces. Stages of the development of systematic position of the investigated soils in the World Edifisols are presented taking into account the function- Reference Base for Soil Resources. ing of the building in the course of time. Materials and methods The research was carried out in 2009– Conclusions Edifisols are formed as a result of initial, 2012 in seven countries. Samples (23 in total) were acciden- relatively natural soil-forming processes occurring on tally collected from 15 municipalities of different size and man-made substrates. Therefore, they may be considered function ranging from villages, small tourist resorts through as technogenic analogues of natural initial or weakly medium-sized regional centres to metropolises.
    [Show full text]
  • Soil and Environment
    Open Access Journal of Environmental and Soil Sciences DOI: 10.32474/OAJESS.2019.03.000161 ISSN: 2641-6794 Mini Review Soil and Environment Dustin J Welbourne* Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, USA *Corresponding author: Dustin J Welbourne, Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, USA Received: July 17, 2019 Published: July 26, 2019 Mini Review previous term explicitly to uprooted soil [15]. life forms that together help life. Earth’s collection of soil, called some logical definitions separate earth from soil by limiting the Soil is a blend of natural issue, minerals, gases, fluids, and plant development; as a method for water stockpiling, supply and an assortment of reasons. Right off the bat, it is utilized to watch The companion survey procedure is significant in science for the pedosphere, has four significant capacities: as a vehicle for that the creator has not appropriated their work. For instance, by beings. These capacities, in their turn, alter the dirt, and you duplicate gluing from Wikipedia, which, I should include, is quite cleaning; as a modifier of Earth’s air; and, as a territory for living would have known this in the event that you read Wikipedia. The great. Actually, I Figure I may complete this article with another pedosphere interfaces with the lithosphere, the hydrosphere, the air, and the biosphere [1]. The term pedolith, utilized regularly to (Figure 1). On a side note, on the off chance that you are perusing duplicate glue from Wikipedia and incorporate a couple of figures allude to the dirt, means ground stone in the sense “key stone”[2].
    [Show full text]
  • Soil Climate Regimes of Pennsylvania
    Penn State Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 873 Soil Climate Regimes of Pennsylvania College of Agricultural Sciences Soil Climate Regimes of Pennsylvania William J. Waltman, Edward J. Ciolkosz, Maurice J. Mausbach, Mark D. Svoboda, Douglas A. Miller, and Philip J. Kolb Penn State Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 873 April 1997 A cooperative project of the NRCS Soil Quality Institute and the Penn State Agricultural Experiment Station Soil Quality Institute, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Iowa State University, Ames, IA National Soil Survey Center, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Lincoln, NE ii SOIL CLIMATE REGIMES OF PENNSYLVANIA Correct Citation: Waltman, W.J., E.J. Ciolkosz, M. J. Mausbach, M.D. Svoboda, D. A. Miller, and P.J. Kolb. 1997. Soil Climate Regimes of Pennsylvania. Bulletin No. 873, Pennsylvania State University Agricultural Experiment Station, University Park, PA 16802. About the Authors William J. Waltman is GIS Specialist, Northern Plains Regional Office, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Lincoln, NE. Edward J. Ciolkosz is Professor of Soil Genesis, Agronomy Department, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA. Maurice J. Mausbach is Director, Soil Quality Institute, Natural Resources Conservaton Service, Iowa State University, Ames, IA. Mark D. Svoboda is Climate Resources Specialist, National Drought Mitigation Center, Department of Agricultural Meteorology, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE. Douglas A. Miller is Research Associate, Earth System Science Center, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA. Phlip J. Kolb is Research Assistant, Earth System Science Center, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in its programs on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, and marital or familial status.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings-Management and Productivity of Western-Montane Forest Soils
    This file was created by scanning the printed publication. Errors identified by the software have been corrected; however, some errors may remain. DO~SOaFORMATION PROCESSES AND PROPERTIES IN WESTERN-MONTANE FOREST TYPES AND LANDSCAPES-SOME IMPLICATIONS FOR PRODUCTIVITY AND MANAGEMENT Robert T. Meurisse Wayne A. Robbie Jerry Niehoff Gary Ford ABSTRACT Soil is the primary medium for regulating movement and storage of energy and water and for regulating The principal soil orders in western-montane forests cycles and availability of plant nutrients. Soil also pro­ are Inceptisols, Alfisols, Andisols, and Mollisols. Soil vides anchorage, aeration, heat for roots, and is home moisture and temperature regimes strongly influence for many decomposers and element-transforming organ­ forest type distribution and productivity. The most pro­ isms. Informed inquiry and understanding are critical ductive and resilient forests are on soils with udic mois­ for making sound decisions about effective and efficient ture and frigid temperature regimes. Soils with low use and management of these vital resources. The objec­ water-holding capacity in us tic, xeric, and aridic mois­ tives of this paper are to: (1) characterize the dominant ture regimes and those with cryic temperature regimes soil-formation processes and properties in the principal are least productive and resilient. Soil organic carbon western-montane forest types and landscapes; (2) illus­ and nitrogen contents range from about 20,000 to more trate the major soil moisture and temperature regime than 100,000 and 1,200 to 9,000 pounds per acre. gradients of these forest types; and (3) discuss some implications for ecosystem function, productivity, and INTRODUCTION management.
    [Show full text]