Proceedings-Management and Productivity of Western-Montane Forest Soils

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Proceedings-Management and Productivity of Western-Montane Forest Soils This file was created by scanning the printed publication. Errors identified by the software have been corrected; however, some errors may remain. DO~SOaFORMATION PROCESSES AND PROPERTIES IN WESTERN-MONTANE FOREST TYPES AND LANDSCAPES-SOME IMPLICATIONS FOR PRODUCTIVITY AND MANAGEMENT Robert T. Meurisse Wayne A. Robbie Jerry Niehoff Gary Ford ABSTRACT Soil is the primary medium for regulating movement and storage of energy and water and for regulating The principal soil orders in western-montane forests cycles and availability of plant nutrients. Soil also pro­ are Inceptisols, Alfisols, Andisols, and Mollisols. Soil vides anchorage, aeration, heat for roots, and is home moisture and temperature regimes strongly influence for many decomposers and element-transforming organ­ forest type distribution and productivity. The most pro­ isms. Informed inquiry and understanding are critical ductive and resilient forests are on soils with udic mois­ for making sound decisions about effective and efficient ture and frigid temperature regimes. Soils with low use and management of these vital resources. The objec­ water-holding capacity in us tic, xeric, and aridic mois­ tives of this paper are to: (1) characterize the dominant ture regimes and those with cryic temperature regimes soil-formation processes and properties in the principal are least productive and resilient. Soil organic carbon western-montane forest types and landscapes; (2) illus­ and nitrogen contents range from about 20,000 to more trate the major soil moisture and temperature regime than 100,000 and 1,200 to 9,000 pounds per acre. gradients of these forest types; and (3) discuss some implications for ecosystem function, productivity, and INTRODUCTION management. The western-montane forests occupy a vast area of the WESTERN·MONTANE FOREST western United States in which active mountain build­ ing, erosion processes, and weathering regimes interact TYPES AND EXTENT to produce landscapes and ecosystems of great diversity, The focus of this paper is on the western-montane grandeur, and degrees of resilience to land disturbance. forest types as described by Burns (1983) and the soils Geologically, land surfaces vary from very recent (sev­ that support them. The principal forest types, their eral thousands of years) to very old (millions of years). extent, and symbolic codes are in table 1. For further Soil-forming processes operating on these diverse land­ information about each of these types, refer to Agricul­ scapes have formed heterogeneous soils with highly ture Handbook 445. Additional information about the variant properties. The resulting soil-forest ecosystems forest types particular to the Inland North west and their are likewise heterogeneous in character and function productivity, processes, and properties is provided by and require site-specific understanding for making man­ Harvey and others (1989). agement interpretations that provide for ecosystem sustainability and health. Nevertheless, some important principles and concepts can be established to serve as PRINCIPAL KINDS OF SOILS guides for forest resource management. The most direct way to characterize the kinds of soil occurring in western-montane forests is to discuss the occurrence of soil orders. Soil orders are the highest taxonomic class in the United States system of soil clas­ sification (Soil Survey Staff 1975). They are differenti­ Paper presented at the Symposium on Management and Productivity ated by the presence or absence of diagnostic horizons of Western-Montane Forest Soils, Boise, 10, April 10-12, 1990. or features that reflect differences in the dominant soil­ Robert T. Meurisse is Regional Soil Scientist, Pacific Northwest Region, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Portland, OR 97208. forming processes that occurred. The recent amendment Wayne A. Robbie is Supemsory Soil Scientist, Southwestern Region, to the National Soil Taxonomy Handbook established a Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Albuquerque, NM. Jerry new soil order-Andisols (Soil Survey Staff 1989), mak­ Niehoff and Gary Ford are Soil Scientists, Idaho Panhandle National Forests, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Coeur d'Alene, ID. ing 11 soil orders. Hausenbuiller (1978) provides a more 7 Table 1-Western-montane forest types and extent and their domi­ complete description of soil orders and the other truco­ nant soil moisture and temperature regimes nomic levels. Within the vast western-montane region, Code Name nine of the 11 soil orders occur, though several are rare. Only the highly weathered and leached Ultisols and Oxisols Million acres apparently are absent. Data are unavailable for precise USTIC·UDIC Moisture Regime estimates of the extent of soil orders. However, a review M ESIC·FRIGI D·CRYIC Temperature Regime of selected soil survey reports and interpretation of data from "Soils of the Western United States" (Washington SWPIPO Southwestern State University 1964) permits a reasonable estimate of ponderosa pine 11 relative occurrence (table 2). Probably the major differ­ PIPO/PSME v.gl Ponderosa ence between current estimates and the 1964 report is the pine-Rocky 20 relatively low occurrence of Spodosols. Many of the soils Mountain that were formerly thought to be Spodosols are now clas­ Douglas-fir sified as Andisols, Alfisols, and Inceptisols. MC/PI MO/TH PL Mixed conifer­ Inceptisols are a diverse group of soils of intermediate western white development in humid and subhumid regions. They are pine-western 5 mostly friable soils with moderate-to-high levels of or­ redcedar ganic carbon. Though many have high rock fragment PICO Lodgepole pine 13 content (more than 35 percent by volume) and have cryic temperature regimes, they usually are moderately deep PIEN/ABLA Engelmann and deep and are relatively fertile. Many are on unstable spruce-sub­ 10 and active fluvial slopes in the Idaho Batholith. alpine fir Alfisols occur on a variety oflandscapes, but most are XERIC·UDIC Moisture Regime stable or meta-stable surfaces. They support a wide range FRIGID·CRYIC Temperature Regime offorest types. Alfisols have relatively light-colored sur­ face horizons and the dominant feature is the presence of NWPIPO Northwest Ponderosa pine 7 an enriched subsurface clay layer. Most clays are the expanding 2:1 layer types. Ion exchange capacities are ABGRIPSME Grand fir­ moderate to high and the soils have relatively high fertil­ v.gl Douglas-fir ity. These soils dominate the Colorado Plateau in the (Rocky Mountain) 6 southern part of the western-montane forests (Meurisse LAOC Western larch 3 and others 1975). ABMAIABCO Red fir- Andisols are forming mostly in volcanic ejecta such as white fir 4 ash, pumice, cinders, and lava. These soils have a charac­ USTIC·ARIDIC Moisture Regime teristic layer of volcanic ash or pumice, 14 inches (35 cm) MESIC·FRIGID Temperature Regime to several feet thick over buried soils. These soils, and intergrades to other orders, are among the most produc­ P-J Pinjon-juniper 48 tive of western-montane forest soils (Meurisse 1985, 1987). Andisols occur mostly in the northwestern and Table 2-Estimated relative occurrence of soil orders in the western-montane forest region. The principal associated forest types are shown in their relative occurrence in each soil order Soil Relative order occurrence Principal associated forest types Inceptisols 3.0 PICO, PIEN/ABLA, PIPO/PSME, LAOC, ABMAIABCO, ABGRIPSME Alfisols 2.0 SW PI PO, PICO, PIPO/PSME, MC/PIMO/THPL, PIEN/ABLA, P-J, LAOC, ABMAIABCO Andisols 1.6 ABGRIPSME, MC/PIMOITHPL, NW PIPO, PICO, PIEN/ABLA, LAOC, SW PIPO Mollisols 1.3 PIPO/PSME, SW PIPO, P-J, NW PIPO Aridisols .8 P-J Entisols .6 PiCe, PIEN/ABLA, P-J Spocfosols .5 PIEN/ABLA, PICO Others .2 10.0 8 northern parts of the western-montane region, on pla­ SOIL MOISTURE AND teaus and gentle to moderately steep mountain slopes. TEMPERATURE REGIME Some are on steep and very steep slopes in northern Idaho and have a high erosion hazard. GRADIENTS OF FOREST TYPES Mollisols are characterized by thick, dark-colored sur­ Available soil moisture and soil temperature regimes are face horizons with at least 1 percent organic matter in two overriding variables affecting the distribution, species the surface mineral soil layers. They occur mostly in the mix, and productivity of western-montane forests. Soil relatively dry western-montane forests and often have moisture and temperature regimes are internal soil proper­ an abundance of grass and forbs in the understory. Many ties and are described in the Soil Taxonomy Handbook of the forests transitional to pinyon-juniper forests and (Soil Survey Staff 1975) and by Hausenbuiller (1978). grasslands occur on these soils. They occur mostly on Generalized descriptions of these regimes are in table 3. stable mountain slopes and high plateaus. The distribution of the principal western-montane forest The Aridisols occupy the driest parts of the region, and types, by soil moisture and temperature regimes, is the principal forest is the pinjon-juniper type. Entisols ill ustrated in figures 1 and 2. The size of the delineation are forming in parent materials of recent origin, in cold is proportional to the distribution of the forest type ac­ climates, and on some unstable land surfaces where ero­ cording to these regimes and mean annual precipitation. sion prevents development of diagnostic features. It does not necessarily relate to aerial extent. For ex­ Spodosols are strongly acid and have low levels of base ample, the ponderosa pine (Pinus
Recommended publications
  • NRCS Keys to Soil Taxonomy
    United States Department of Agriculture Keys to Soil Taxonomy Ninth Edition, 2003 Keys to Soil Taxonomy By Soil Survey Staff United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service Ninth Edition, 2003 The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at 202-720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call 202-720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Cover: A natric horizon with columnar structure in a Natrudoll from Argentina. 5 Table of Contents Foreword .................................................................................................................................... 7 Chapter 1: The Soils That We Classify.................................................................................. 9 Chapter 2: Differentiae for Mineral Soils and Organic Soils ............................................... 11 Chapter 3: Horizons and Characteristics Diagnostic for the Higher Categories .................
    [Show full text]
  • Keys to Soil Taxonomy
    United States Department of Agriculture Keys to Soil Taxonomy Ninth Edition, 2003 Keys to Soil Taxonomy By Soil Survey Staff United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service Ninth Edition, 2003 The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at 202-720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call 202-720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Cover: A natric horizon with columnar structure in a Natrudoll from Argentina. 5 Table of Contents Foreword .................................................................................................................................... 7 Chapter 1: The Soils That We Classify.................................................................................. 9 Chapter 2: Differentiae for Mineral Soils and Organic Soils ............................................... 11 Chapter 3: Horizons and Characteristics Diagnostic for the Higher Categories .................
    [Show full text]
  • This File Was Created by Scanning the Printed Publication
    This file was created by scanning the printed publication. Text errors identified by the software have been corrected; however, some errors may remain. Editors SHARON E. CLARKE is a geographer and GIS analyst, Department of Forest Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331; and SANDRA A. BRYCE is a biogeographer, Dynamac Corporation, Environmental Protection Agency, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Western Ecology Division, Corvallis, OR 97333. This document is a product of cooperative research between the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service; the Forest Science De- partment, Oregon State University; and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Cover Artwork Cover artwork was designed and produced by John Ivie. Abstract Clarke, Sharon E.; Bryce, Sandra A., eds. 1997. Hierarchical subdivisions of the Columbia Plateau and Blue Mountains ecoregions, Oregon and Washington. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-395. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 114 p. This document presents two spatial scales of a hierarchical, ecoregional framework and provides a connection to both larger and smaller scale ecological classifications. The two spatial scales are subregions (1:250,000) and landscape-level ecoregions (1:100,000), or Level IV and Level V ecoregions. Level IV ecoregions were developed by the Environmental Protection Agency because the resolution of national-scale ecoregions provided insufficient detail to meet the needs of state agencies for estab- lishing biocriteria, reference sites, and attainability goals for water-quality regulation. For this project, two ecoregions—the Columbia Plateau and the Blue Mountains— were subdivided into more detailed Level IV ecoregions.
    [Show full text]
  • Soil Climate Regimes of Pennsylvania
    Penn State Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 873 Soil Climate Regimes of Pennsylvania College of Agricultural Sciences Soil Climate Regimes of Pennsylvania William J. Waltman, Edward J. Ciolkosz, Maurice J. Mausbach, Mark D. Svoboda, Douglas A. Miller, and Philip J. Kolb Penn State Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 873 April 1997 A cooperative project of the NRCS Soil Quality Institute and the Penn State Agricultural Experiment Station Soil Quality Institute, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Iowa State University, Ames, IA National Soil Survey Center, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Lincoln, NE ii SOIL CLIMATE REGIMES OF PENNSYLVANIA Correct Citation: Waltman, W.J., E.J. Ciolkosz, M. J. Mausbach, M.D. Svoboda, D. A. Miller, and P.J. Kolb. 1997. Soil Climate Regimes of Pennsylvania. Bulletin No. 873, Pennsylvania State University Agricultural Experiment Station, University Park, PA 16802. About the Authors William J. Waltman is GIS Specialist, Northern Plains Regional Office, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Lincoln, NE. Edward J. Ciolkosz is Professor of Soil Genesis, Agronomy Department, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA. Maurice J. Mausbach is Director, Soil Quality Institute, Natural Resources Conservaton Service, Iowa State University, Ames, IA. Mark D. Svoboda is Climate Resources Specialist, National Drought Mitigation Center, Department of Agricultural Meteorology, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE. Douglas A. Miller is Research Associate, Earth System Science Center, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA. Phlip J. Kolb is Research Assistant, Earth System Science Center, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in its programs on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, and marital or familial status.
    [Show full text]
  • Jarauta-Bragulat, E. (1998)
    PRESENTING, ANALYSING AND COMPARING TWO SOIL MOISTURE REGIME SIMULATION MODELS. APPLICATION TO MOISTURE REGIMES ESTIMATION OF CATALONIA SOILS. Eusebi JARAUTA-BRAGULAT Dept of Applied Mathematics III. Civil Engineering School, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya. C/. Gran Capità, s/n. Edif. C2. 08034-Barcelona (Spain). E-mail: [email protected] Carme HERVADA-SALA Dept of Physics and Nuclear Engineering. Industrial Engineering School, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya. C/. Colom, 1. 08222-Terrassa (Spain). E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT Two main models have been developped for soil moisture regime simulation. The first one was presented by F.Newhall in 1976; the second one was proposed by E.Jarauta in 1989, modifying important aspects of such model: soil profile modelling, infiltration process simulation, evapotranspiration process simulation and Soil Taxonomy criteria application. In this paper we present and analyse both models, and compare their application to soil moisture regime estimation of Catalonia soils. Results obtained are compared to field data. We also present a discussion of the most important aspects to improve in soil moisture regime modelling. 1. INTRODUCTION Soil surveys rely very heavily on soil classification. The usefulness of a soil survey is a critical component in the way that soil science can be made available to users. However, soil surveys are only valuable if the information they contain can help to solve soil-related problems. Soil surveys often contain information that may appear to be of limited value; alternatively, users may not be able to understand some data included in a soil survey report. The amount of useful information in soil surveys should be increased; this can be done by increasing the total information but also by making more reliable predictions from the data.
    [Show full text]
  • STUDENT UNDERSTANDING of SOIL CLASSIFICATION USING the SIMPLIFIED GUIDE to SOIL TAXONOMY by KIM KERSCHEN B.S., Kansas State Univ
    STUDENT UNDERSTANDING OF SOIL CLASSIFICATION USING THE SIMPLIFIED GUIDE TO SOIL TAXONOMY by KIM KERSCHEN B.S., Kansas State University, 2012 A THESIS submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF SCIENCE Department of Agronomy College of Agriculture KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Manhattan, Kansas 2014 Approved by: Major Professor Michel D. Ransom Copyright KIM JANAY KERSCHEN 2014 Abstract Soil Taxonomy is the official soil classification system used in the United States and many other countries. Any soil in the world can be classified from the order to the family level using a set of classification keys that are currently in an eleventh edition. The classification system is quite complex and can be too complicated for beginning soil science students to understand and use. Thus, a national advisory working group of the National Cooperative Soil Survey developed an abbreviated guide called the Simplified Guide to Soil Taxonomy. The goal of the simplified guide is to help reduce the complexity of soil taxonomy and aid in the classification of soils from the order to the great group level. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the simplified guided when used by students in soil science courses to classify soils as compared to traditional methods using the more detailed keys. Classes at Kansas State University were used in the study and included the laboratory sections of AGRON 305 (Soils) and AGRON 515 (Soil Genesis and Classification). Student learning was evaluated using pre and post-test scores, assignments, and evaluation surveys. Results from the fall and spring semesters of AGRON 305 vary based on pre and post test scores and the assignment.
    [Show full text]
  • Soil Moisture and Temperature Regimes in Soil Taxonomy S
    9 duripan. These horizons occur mostly in soils of arid and Co., New York, 1956. and semiarid regions and indicate the depth of water 2. Soil Taxonomy: A Basic System of Soil Classification movement. In soils rich in carbonates, the calcic hori­ for Making and Interpreting Soil Surveys. Soil Con­ zon tends in time to become plugged with carbonates servation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, and cemented into a hard, massive, continuous horizon U.S. Government Printing Office, USDA Handbook that is called petrocalcic. In engineering behavior this 436, 1975. horizon simulates hard country rock. 3. L. J. Bartelli and T. A. Weems. Formation and The diagnostic horizons may not have a direct bearing Classification of Soils. Soil Survey of Tensas Parish, on soil behavior, but they are important building blocks Louisiana, U.S. Government Printing Office, 1968, of the system. They are used to group together soils pp. 58-62. that have something in common that is eventually ex­ 4. G. D. Smith. Objectives and Basic Assumptions of pressed in the unique behavior of the soil. For example, the New Classification System. Soil Science, Vol. 96, ai·gillic horizons indicate an accumulation of transported No. 1, July 1963, pp. 6-16. clay; they do not reflect kind and amount of clay, which 5. R. W. Simonson. Lessons From the First Half of · strongly influence engineering behavior. Kind and Soil Survey? I. Classification of Soils. Soil Science, amount of clay aJ'e reflected in the lower categories of Vol. 74, No. 3, Sept. 1952, pp. 240-257. the system, namely, family and series.
    [Show full text]
  • An Examination of Geographic Patterns of Soil Climate and Its Classification in the U.S
    Purdue University Purdue e-Pubs Open Access Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 12-2016 An examination of geographic patterns of soil climate and its classification in the U.S. system of soil taxonomy Hans Edwin Winzeler Purdue University Follow this and additional works at: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/open_access_dissertations Part of the Climate Commons, and the Soil Science Commons Recommended Citation Winzeler, Hans Edwin, "An examination of geographic patterns of soil climate and its classification in the U.S. system of soil taxonomy" (2016). Open Access Dissertations. 1028. https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/open_access_dissertations/1028 This document has been made available through Purdue e-Pubs, a service of the Purdue University Libraries. Please contact [email protected] for additional information. Graduate School Form 30 Updated PURDUE UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL Thesis/Dissertation Acceptance This is to certify that the thesis/dissertation prepared By Hans Edwin Winzeler Entitled AN EXAMINATION OF GEOGRAPHIC PATTERNS OF SOIL CLIMATE AND ITS CLASSIFICATION IN THE U.S. SYSTEM OF SOIL TAXONOMY For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Is approved by the final examining committee: Phillip R. Owens Zamir Libohova Co-chair Brad Joern Co-chair Venkatesh Merwade Darrel Schulze To the best of my knowledge and as understood by the student in the Thesis/Dissertation Agreement, Publication Delay, and Certification Disclaimer (Graduate School Form 32), this thesis/dissertation adheres to the provisions of Purdue University’s “Policy of Integrity in Research” and the use of copyright material. Approved by Major Professor(s): Phillip R. Owens and Brad Joern Approved by: Joe M. Anderson 12/7/2016 Head of the Departmental Graduate Program Date i AN EXAMINATION OF GEOGRAPHIC PATTERNS OF SOIL CLIMATE AND ITS CLASSIFICATION IN THE U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Jnsm 1.6.0 - Java Newhall Simulation Model
    jNSM 1.6.0 - Java Newhall Simulation Model User Guide – Part II 1 User Guide – Part II jNSM 1.6.0 – Java Newhall Simulation Model Useful References for jNSM Reproductions of the references listed below appear on the pages that follow. Kellogg, C. E. 1969. United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service Memo dated March 5, 1969 Re: Soil temperature and soil moisture measurements. (Two pages) Newhall, F., and C.R. Berdanier. 1996. Calculation of soil moisture regimes from the climatic record. Soil Survey Investigations Report No. 46, National Soil Survey Center, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Lincoln, NE. (Fifteen pages) USDA Soil Conservation Service. 1964. Soil-Temperature Regimes -- their characteristics and predictability. SDS-TP-144 April 1964. 14 pages. (Sixteen pages) Van Wambeke, A. 1982. Calculated soil moisture and temperature regimes of Africa. Soil Management Support Services Technical Monograph No. 3, USDA-SCS, Washington, D.C. As of 8/2011 available via: http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PNAAQ982.pdf (Nine pages -- only pages 3 – 11 are reproduced) Van Wambeke, A. R. 2000. The Newhall Simulation Model for estimating soil moisture & temperature regimes. Department of Crop and Soil Sciences. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY. (Nine pages) Van Wambeke, A., Hastings, P., & Tolomeo, M. 1986. Newhall simulation model: a BASIC program for the IBM PC. Ithaca, NY: Department of Agronomy, Cornell University. Diskette and Booklet. (Forty-two pages) 2 User Guide- Part 2 jNSM 1.6.0 Java Newhall Simulation Model The following two pages are: Kellogg, C. E. 1969. United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service Memo dated March 5, 1969 Re: Soil temperature and soil moisture measurements.
    [Show full text]
  • Soils of the Tropics
    Chapter 4 Soils of the Tropics Fig. 4.1 Soil order map of the tropics. Adapted from NRCS (2005) This chapter describes the main soils of the tropics, grouped technical. Natural systems classify soils as natural bodies in natural soil classification systems, those that describe and in their own right, while technical systems classify soils classify soils in their natural state. Classification is an according to their suitability for a specificuse,suchas important element of science, as knowledge is organized agriculture, engineering or waste disposal (Chapter 5). into categories and classes that are useful, or necessary for Naturalsoilclassification systems are divided into those communications among scientists (Cline 1949). Categories based on soil genesis (what the soil should be according to are hierarchical levels (for example states and municipalities the factors of soil formation) and those based on soil in a federal government system). Classes are the individual morphology, on actual soil properties (what the soils units that fall in a category (for example the individual are). The factors of soil formation are climate, organisms, states in a particular country and the individual municipal- parent material, topography and time (Jenny 1941). ities in a particular state). Initially, soil classification systems were all genetic; now- Many soil classification systems have been used in the adays, they are morphological but underpinned by tropics. They fall into two broad groups, natural and concepts of soil genesis. 4.1 SOIL TAXONOMY 83 The strong genetic orientation of early Russian and 4.1 Soil Taxonomy American pedologists1 led to the zonality concept. Zonal soils were those that have properties according to what Themountingevidenceagainsttheusefulnessofthedirect genesis theory indicates in terms of climate, vegetation, application of genetic theories in practical classification topography, parent material and age.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Soil Description
    GUIDELINES FOR SOIL DESCRIPTION Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Germany GUIDELINES FOR Universität Kiel, Germany SOIL DESCRIPTION Leyte State University, The Philippines ISRIC – World Soil Information, The Netherlands Technische Universität München, Germany ������������������ FAO � � � � � � � � � � � � � ������������������������ Guidelines for soil description Fourth edition FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 2006 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. ISBN 92-5-105521-1 All rights reserved. Reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product for educational or other non-commercial purposes are authorized without any prior written permission from the copyright holders provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of material in this information product for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without written permission of the copyright holders. Applications for such permission should be addressed to: Chief Publishing Management Service Information Division FAO Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00100 Rome, Italy or by e-mail to: [email protected] © FAO 2006 iii Contents Acknowledgements ix List of acronyms x 1. Introduction 1 2. General
    [Show full text]
  • PNAAJ979.Pdf
    Now York State Colege of Agriculture and Life Sciences Comel Univrslty Departmen of Agronomy Soil Management Support Services (SMSS) Soll Conseration Service U.S. Deparbmnt of Agriulure A. VAN WAMBnKE SOUTH AMERICA -- -) U- 23 I c cp.:222u222: 12u121 CUU)33./=arl*1 z2 Z-2) II.:I I IIP 3 3 UU-WJ K I Iwg UIIJ U U U CI CP aS I puu u u p I u uM P c I I I UU • U~ 0 UU3I u a I IlU U , U N l l p P 3 22II l •a 3 3 l I I I IC 04 •.,1 U I a v 3 i s3I cj II U £ I I 3U I U C, C £ I ,I II~II as : ! 2 . 13,13131 I U.U 22-- , 233 I ,UU 3 UI a 3 s2 I A a3 U UU 3U3 33 3 £1A U2 I U I P a 3 31 I 1 -w23 3 1 a 3 2 133 1u 3UC u I S2 uu SCu Aa I 0C c cuu u C &F U u UU UUuAO U 0 v p P SU u U PPPPIp p u4U P P o Ip lAD P P PP P UU U U UU Fm X" * U U • U U _IC I s 1 UU U U i UU UU U U c vi ... * €0 i 3- ,F U U Cc~ I u v~ U­ (01 US. * I p ..... .....................-. ............. SOIL MOISTURE AND TEMPERATURE REGIMES All reported statements are those of the author, and not those of the Agency for International Development, Cornell University, or the Soil Conservation Service of the United States Department of Agriculture.
    [Show full text]