Proceedings-Management and Productivity of Western-Montane Forest Soils
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
NRCS Keys to Soil Taxonomy
United States Department of Agriculture Keys to Soil Taxonomy Ninth Edition, 2003 Keys to Soil Taxonomy By Soil Survey Staff United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service Ninth Edition, 2003 The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at 202-720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call 202-720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Cover: A natric horizon with columnar structure in a Natrudoll from Argentina. 5 Table of Contents Foreword .................................................................................................................................... 7 Chapter 1: The Soils That We Classify.................................................................................. 9 Chapter 2: Differentiae for Mineral Soils and Organic Soils ............................................... 11 Chapter 3: Horizons and Characteristics Diagnostic for the Higher Categories ................. -
Keys to Soil Taxonomy
United States Department of Agriculture Keys to Soil Taxonomy Ninth Edition, 2003 Keys to Soil Taxonomy By Soil Survey Staff United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service Ninth Edition, 2003 The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at 202-720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call 202-720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Cover: A natric horizon with columnar structure in a Natrudoll from Argentina. 5 Table of Contents Foreword .................................................................................................................................... 7 Chapter 1: The Soils That We Classify.................................................................................. 9 Chapter 2: Differentiae for Mineral Soils and Organic Soils ............................................... 11 Chapter 3: Horizons and Characteristics Diagnostic for the Higher Categories ................. -
This File Was Created by Scanning the Printed Publication
This file was created by scanning the printed publication. Text errors identified by the software have been corrected; however, some errors may remain. Editors SHARON E. CLARKE is a geographer and GIS analyst, Department of Forest Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331; and SANDRA A. BRYCE is a biogeographer, Dynamac Corporation, Environmental Protection Agency, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Western Ecology Division, Corvallis, OR 97333. This document is a product of cooperative research between the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service; the Forest Science De- partment, Oregon State University; and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Cover Artwork Cover artwork was designed and produced by John Ivie. Abstract Clarke, Sharon E.; Bryce, Sandra A., eds. 1997. Hierarchical subdivisions of the Columbia Plateau and Blue Mountains ecoregions, Oregon and Washington. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-395. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 114 p. This document presents two spatial scales of a hierarchical, ecoregional framework and provides a connection to both larger and smaller scale ecological classifications. The two spatial scales are subregions (1:250,000) and landscape-level ecoregions (1:100,000), or Level IV and Level V ecoregions. Level IV ecoregions were developed by the Environmental Protection Agency because the resolution of national-scale ecoregions provided insufficient detail to meet the needs of state agencies for estab- lishing biocriteria, reference sites, and attainability goals for water-quality regulation. For this project, two ecoregions—the Columbia Plateau and the Blue Mountains— were subdivided into more detailed Level IV ecoregions. -
Soil Climate Regimes of Pennsylvania
Penn State Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 873 Soil Climate Regimes of Pennsylvania College of Agricultural Sciences Soil Climate Regimes of Pennsylvania William J. Waltman, Edward J. Ciolkosz, Maurice J. Mausbach, Mark D. Svoboda, Douglas A. Miller, and Philip J. Kolb Penn State Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 873 April 1997 A cooperative project of the NRCS Soil Quality Institute and the Penn State Agricultural Experiment Station Soil Quality Institute, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Iowa State University, Ames, IA National Soil Survey Center, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Lincoln, NE ii SOIL CLIMATE REGIMES OF PENNSYLVANIA Correct Citation: Waltman, W.J., E.J. Ciolkosz, M. J. Mausbach, M.D. Svoboda, D. A. Miller, and P.J. Kolb. 1997. Soil Climate Regimes of Pennsylvania. Bulletin No. 873, Pennsylvania State University Agricultural Experiment Station, University Park, PA 16802. About the Authors William J. Waltman is GIS Specialist, Northern Plains Regional Office, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Lincoln, NE. Edward J. Ciolkosz is Professor of Soil Genesis, Agronomy Department, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA. Maurice J. Mausbach is Director, Soil Quality Institute, Natural Resources Conservaton Service, Iowa State University, Ames, IA. Mark D. Svoboda is Climate Resources Specialist, National Drought Mitigation Center, Department of Agricultural Meteorology, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE. Douglas A. Miller is Research Associate, Earth System Science Center, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA. Phlip J. Kolb is Research Assistant, Earth System Science Center, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in its programs on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, and marital or familial status. -
Jarauta-Bragulat, E. (1998)
PRESENTING, ANALYSING AND COMPARING TWO SOIL MOISTURE REGIME SIMULATION MODELS. APPLICATION TO MOISTURE REGIMES ESTIMATION OF CATALONIA SOILS. Eusebi JARAUTA-BRAGULAT Dept of Applied Mathematics III. Civil Engineering School, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya. C/. Gran Capità, s/n. Edif. C2. 08034-Barcelona (Spain). E-mail: [email protected] Carme HERVADA-SALA Dept of Physics and Nuclear Engineering. Industrial Engineering School, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya. C/. Colom, 1. 08222-Terrassa (Spain). E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT Two main models have been developped for soil moisture regime simulation. The first one was presented by F.Newhall in 1976; the second one was proposed by E.Jarauta in 1989, modifying important aspects of such model: soil profile modelling, infiltration process simulation, evapotranspiration process simulation and Soil Taxonomy criteria application. In this paper we present and analyse both models, and compare their application to soil moisture regime estimation of Catalonia soils. Results obtained are compared to field data. We also present a discussion of the most important aspects to improve in soil moisture regime modelling. 1. INTRODUCTION Soil surveys rely very heavily on soil classification. The usefulness of a soil survey is a critical component in the way that soil science can be made available to users. However, soil surveys are only valuable if the information they contain can help to solve soil-related problems. Soil surveys often contain information that may appear to be of limited value; alternatively, users may not be able to understand some data included in a soil survey report. The amount of useful information in soil surveys should be increased; this can be done by increasing the total information but also by making more reliable predictions from the data. -
STUDENT UNDERSTANDING of SOIL CLASSIFICATION USING the SIMPLIFIED GUIDE to SOIL TAXONOMY by KIM KERSCHEN B.S., Kansas State Univ
STUDENT UNDERSTANDING OF SOIL CLASSIFICATION USING THE SIMPLIFIED GUIDE TO SOIL TAXONOMY by KIM KERSCHEN B.S., Kansas State University, 2012 A THESIS submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF SCIENCE Department of Agronomy College of Agriculture KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Manhattan, Kansas 2014 Approved by: Major Professor Michel D. Ransom Copyright KIM JANAY KERSCHEN 2014 Abstract Soil Taxonomy is the official soil classification system used in the United States and many other countries. Any soil in the world can be classified from the order to the family level using a set of classification keys that are currently in an eleventh edition. The classification system is quite complex and can be too complicated for beginning soil science students to understand and use. Thus, a national advisory working group of the National Cooperative Soil Survey developed an abbreviated guide called the Simplified Guide to Soil Taxonomy. The goal of the simplified guide is to help reduce the complexity of soil taxonomy and aid in the classification of soils from the order to the great group level. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the simplified guided when used by students in soil science courses to classify soils as compared to traditional methods using the more detailed keys. Classes at Kansas State University were used in the study and included the laboratory sections of AGRON 305 (Soils) and AGRON 515 (Soil Genesis and Classification). Student learning was evaluated using pre and post-test scores, assignments, and evaluation surveys. Results from the fall and spring semesters of AGRON 305 vary based on pre and post test scores and the assignment. -
Soil Moisture and Temperature Regimes in Soil Taxonomy S
9 duripan. These horizons occur mostly in soils of arid and Co., New York, 1956. and semiarid regions and indicate the depth of water 2. Soil Taxonomy: A Basic System of Soil Classification movement. In soils rich in carbonates, the calcic hori for Making and Interpreting Soil Surveys. Soil Con zon tends in time to become plugged with carbonates servation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, and cemented into a hard, massive, continuous horizon U.S. Government Printing Office, USDA Handbook that is called petrocalcic. In engineering behavior this 436, 1975. horizon simulates hard country rock. 3. L. J. Bartelli and T. A. Weems. Formation and The diagnostic horizons may not have a direct bearing Classification of Soils. Soil Survey of Tensas Parish, on soil behavior, but they are important building blocks Louisiana, U.S. Government Printing Office, 1968, of the system. They are used to group together soils pp. 58-62. that have something in common that is eventually ex 4. G. D. Smith. Objectives and Basic Assumptions of pressed in the unique behavior of the soil. For example, the New Classification System. Soil Science, Vol. 96, ai·gillic horizons indicate an accumulation of transported No. 1, July 1963, pp. 6-16. clay; they do not reflect kind and amount of clay, which 5. R. W. Simonson. Lessons From the First Half of · strongly influence engineering behavior. Kind and Soil Survey? I. Classification of Soils. Soil Science, amount of clay aJ'e reflected in the lower categories of Vol. 74, No. 3, Sept. 1952, pp. 240-257. the system, namely, family and series. -
An Examination of Geographic Patterns of Soil Climate and Its Classification in the U.S
Purdue University Purdue e-Pubs Open Access Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 12-2016 An examination of geographic patterns of soil climate and its classification in the U.S. system of soil taxonomy Hans Edwin Winzeler Purdue University Follow this and additional works at: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/open_access_dissertations Part of the Climate Commons, and the Soil Science Commons Recommended Citation Winzeler, Hans Edwin, "An examination of geographic patterns of soil climate and its classification in the U.S. system of soil taxonomy" (2016). Open Access Dissertations. 1028. https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/open_access_dissertations/1028 This document has been made available through Purdue e-Pubs, a service of the Purdue University Libraries. Please contact [email protected] for additional information. Graduate School Form 30 Updated PURDUE UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL Thesis/Dissertation Acceptance This is to certify that the thesis/dissertation prepared By Hans Edwin Winzeler Entitled AN EXAMINATION OF GEOGRAPHIC PATTERNS OF SOIL CLIMATE AND ITS CLASSIFICATION IN THE U.S. SYSTEM OF SOIL TAXONOMY For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Is approved by the final examining committee: Phillip R. Owens Zamir Libohova Co-chair Brad Joern Co-chair Venkatesh Merwade Darrel Schulze To the best of my knowledge and as understood by the student in the Thesis/Dissertation Agreement, Publication Delay, and Certification Disclaimer (Graduate School Form 32), this thesis/dissertation adheres to the provisions of Purdue University’s “Policy of Integrity in Research” and the use of copyright material. Approved by Major Professor(s): Phillip R. Owens and Brad Joern Approved by: Joe M. Anderson 12/7/2016 Head of the Departmental Graduate Program Date i AN EXAMINATION OF GEOGRAPHIC PATTERNS OF SOIL CLIMATE AND ITS CLASSIFICATION IN THE U.S. -
Jnsm 1.6.0 - Java Newhall Simulation Model
jNSM 1.6.0 - Java Newhall Simulation Model User Guide – Part II 1 User Guide – Part II jNSM 1.6.0 – Java Newhall Simulation Model Useful References for jNSM Reproductions of the references listed below appear on the pages that follow. Kellogg, C. E. 1969. United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service Memo dated March 5, 1969 Re: Soil temperature and soil moisture measurements. (Two pages) Newhall, F., and C.R. Berdanier. 1996. Calculation of soil moisture regimes from the climatic record. Soil Survey Investigations Report No. 46, National Soil Survey Center, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Lincoln, NE. (Fifteen pages) USDA Soil Conservation Service. 1964. Soil-Temperature Regimes -- their characteristics and predictability. SDS-TP-144 April 1964. 14 pages. (Sixteen pages) Van Wambeke, A. 1982. Calculated soil moisture and temperature regimes of Africa. Soil Management Support Services Technical Monograph No. 3, USDA-SCS, Washington, D.C. As of 8/2011 available via: http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PNAAQ982.pdf (Nine pages -- only pages 3 – 11 are reproduced) Van Wambeke, A. R. 2000. The Newhall Simulation Model for estimating soil moisture & temperature regimes. Department of Crop and Soil Sciences. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY. (Nine pages) Van Wambeke, A., Hastings, P., & Tolomeo, M. 1986. Newhall simulation model: a BASIC program for the IBM PC. Ithaca, NY: Department of Agronomy, Cornell University. Diskette and Booklet. (Forty-two pages) 2 User Guide- Part 2 jNSM 1.6.0 Java Newhall Simulation Model The following two pages are: Kellogg, C. E. 1969. United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service Memo dated March 5, 1969 Re: Soil temperature and soil moisture measurements. -
Soils of the Tropics
Chapter 4 Soils of the Tropics Fig. 4.1 Soil order map of the tropics. Adapted from NRCS (2005) This chapter describes the main soils of the tropics, grouped technical. Natural systems classify soils as natural bodies in natural soil classification systems, those that describe and in their own right, while technical systems classify soils classify soils in their natural state. Classification is an according to their suitability for a specificuse,suchas important element of science, as knowledge is organized agriculture, engineering or waste disposal (Chapter 5). into categories and classes that are useful, or necessary for Naturalsoilclassification systems are divided into those communications among scientists (Cline 1949). Categories based on soil genesis (what the soil should be according to are hierarchical levels (for example states and municipalities the factors of soil formation) and those based on soil in a federal government system). Classes are the individual morphology, on actual soil properties (what the soils units that fall in a category (for example the individual are). The factors of soil formation are climate, organisms, states in a particular country and the individual municipal- parent material, topography and time (Jenny 1941). ities in a particular state). Initially, soil classification systems were all genetic; now- Many soil classification systems have been used in the adays, they are morphological but underpinned by tropics. They fall into two broad groups, natural and concepts of soil genesis. 4.1 SOIL TAXONOMY 83 The strong genetic orientation of early Russian and 4.1 Soil Taxonomy American pedologists1 led to the zonality concept. Zonal soils were those that have properties according to what Themountingevidenceagainsttheusefulnessofthedirect genesis theory indicates in terms of climate, vegetation, application of genetic theories in practical classification topography, parent material and age. -
Guidelines for Soil Description
GUIDELINES FOR SOIL DESCRIPTION Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Germany GUIDELINES FOR Universität Kiel, Germany SOIL DESCRIPTION Leyte State University, The Philippines ISRIC – World Soil Information, The Netherlands Technische Universität München, Germany ������������������ FAO � � � � � � � � � � � � � ������������������������ Guidelines for soil description Fourth edition FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 2006 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. ISBN 92-5-105521-1 All rights reserved. Reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product for educational or other non-commercial purposes are authorized without any prior written permission from the copyright holders provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of material in this information product for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without written permission of the copyright holders. Applications for such permission should be addressed to: Chief Publishing Management Service Information Division FAO Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00100 Rome, Italy or by e-mail to: [email protected] © FAO 2006 iii Contents Acknowledgements ix List of acronyms x 1. Introduction 1 2. General -
PNAAJ979.Pdf
Now York State Colege of Agriculture and Life Sciences Comel Univrslty Departmen of Agronomy Soil Management Support Services (SMSS) Soll Conseration Service U.S. Deparbmnt of Agriulure A. VAN WAMBnKE SOUTH AMERICA -- -) U- 23 I c cp.:222u222: 12u121 CUU)33./=arl*1 z2 Z-2) II.:I I IIP 3 3 UU-WJ K I Iwg UIIJ U U U CI CP aS I puu u u p I u uM P c I I I UU • U~ 0 UU3I u a I IlU U , U N l l p P 3 22II l •a 3 3 l I I I IC 04 •.,1 U I a v 3 i s3I cj II U £ I I 3U I U C, C £ I ,I II~II as : ! 2 . 13,13131 I U.U 22-- , 233 I ,UU 3 UI a 3 s2 I A a3 U UU 3U3 33 3 £1A U2 I U I P a 3 31 I 1 -w23 3 1 a 3 2 133 1u 3UC u I S2 uu SCu Aa I 0C c cuu u C &F U u UU UUuAO U 0 v p P SU u U PPPPIp p u4U P P o Ip lAD P P PP P UU U U UU Fm X" * U U • U U _IC I s 1 UU U U i UU UU U U c vi ... * €0 i 3- ,F U U Cc~ I u v~ U (01 US. * I p ..... .....................-. ............. SOIL MOISTURE AND TEMPERATURE REGIMES All reported statements are those of the author, and not those of the Agency for International Development, Cornell University, or the Soil Conservation Service of the United States Department of Agriculture.