Index to Volume 11
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Inter.Nobe 99 Lggg December 06-08
j' This is a preprint or reprint of a paper intended for presentation at a conference. Because changes may be made before formal publication, this is made available with the understanding that it will not be cited or reproduced without the permission of the author. Fort Lauderda|e, Florida, USA inter.nobe 99 lggg December 06-08 ENGINEERED SOLUTIONS TO REDUCE OCCUPATIONAL NOISE EXPOSURE AT THE NASA GLENN RESEARCH CENTER: A FIVE-YEAR PROGRESS SUMMARY (1994-1999) Beth A. Cooper NASA John H. Glenn Research Center at Lewis Field Cleveland, OH 44135 U.S.A. Donald W. Hange Robert P. Madison International, Inc. NASA John H. Glenn Research Center at Lewis Field Cleveland, OH 44135 U.S.A. John J. Mikulic NASA John H. Glenn Research Center at Lewis Field Cleveland, OH 44135 U.S.A. INTRODUCTION At the NASA John H. Glenn Research Center at Lewis Field (formerly the Lewis Research Center), experimental research in aircraft and space propulsion systems is conducted in more than 100 test cells and laboratories. These facilities are supported by a central process air system that supplies high-volume, high-pressure compressed air and vacuum at various conditions that simulate altitude flight. Nearly 100,000 ft 2 of metalworking and specialized fabrication shops located on-site produce prototypes, models, and test hardware in support of experimental research operations. These activities, comprising numerous individual noise sources and operational scenarios, result in a varied and complex noise exposure environment, which is the responsibility of the Glenn Research Center Noise Exposure Management Program. Hearing conservation, community noise complaint response and noise control engineering services are included under the umbrella of this Program, which encompasses the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) standard on occupational noise exposure, §29CFR 1910.95[ 1], as well as the more stringent NASA Health Standard on Hearing Conservation[2]. -
Preventing Hazardous Noise and Hearing Loss
Preventing Hazardous Noise and Hearing Loss during Project Design and Operation Prevention through Design (PtD) Prevention through Design (PtD) Why is PtD Needed? Description of can be defined as designing out Integrating PtD concepts into busi- Exposure or eliminating safety and health ness processes helps reduce injury and hazards associated with processes, Prolonged exposure to high noise levels structures, equipment, tools, or illness in the workplace, as well as costs can cause hearing loss and tinnitus. work organization. The National associated with injuries. PtD lays the Other health effects include headaches, Institute for Occupational Safety foundation for a sustainable culture of fatigue, stress, and cardiovascular and Health (NIOSH) launched a safety with lower workers’ compensation problems [Yueh et al. 2003]. High noise PtD initiative in 2007. The mission expenses, fewer retrofits, and improved levels can also cause workers to be dis- tracted and interfere with communica- is to reduce or prevent occupational productivity. When PtD concepts are in- injuries, illnesses, and fatalities by tion and warning signals. If workers do troduced early in the design process, re- considering hazard prevention in not hear warning signals, they may not the design, re-design, and retrofit of sources can be allocated more efficiently. take precautions to prevent hazards or new and existing workplaces, tools, injuries [NIOSH 1996, 1998; Yoon et al. equipment, and work processes Summary 2015; Cantley et al. 2015]. [NIOSH 2008a,b]. Exposure to high noise levels in the workplace can cause hearing loss and Workers at Risk Contents affect worker productivity and compen- An estimated twenty-two million work- ▶ Why is PtD Needed sation costs. -
Buy Quiet Procedure Esperance
BUY QUIET PROCEDURE ESPERANCE BUY QUIET PROCEDURE - ESPERANCE DOCUMENT CONTROL Version Description Reviewed by Approved by Revision Issue Date Number Date 0 First Draft to include D Lindkvist A Byers Feb 2016 Feb 2016 reference to Environmental Noise 1 Comments section 1 used A Byers A Byers Feb 2016 Feb 2016 equipment 2 Environmental noise A Leonard A Byers Feb 2016 Feb 2016 3 Insertion of: Responsible A Leonard J Oldfield Jan 2017 Jan 2017 Person, role of Environmental Department and using broadband “croaker” reversing alarms. 4 Minor amendments. A Leonard A Leonard Nov 2017 Nov 2017 Document Facilitator: Environment Manager Version No: 04 Issue Date: 17/11/2017 Authorised by: Environment Manager Record No: D17/595 UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED Page 2 of 7 BUY QUIET PROCEDURE - ESPERANCE TABLE OF CONTENTS DOCUMENT CONTROL .............................................................................................. 2 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................ 4 2. SP NOISE LEVEL GOAL ................................................................................ 4 3. TEAM RESPONSIBILITIES ............................................................................ 4 3.1. Requestor ....................................................................................................... 4 3.2. Appointed Noise Officer .................................................................................. 4 3.3. Environmental Department ............................................................................ -
Noise Control Methods for Shipbuilding
Noise Control Methods for Shipbuilding Final Report NSRP Subcontract Agreement No. 2012-424 Presented To: National Shipbuilding Research Program Operated by Advanced Technology Incorporated Prepared By: Daniel O. Chute, CIH, CSP Atrium Environmental Health and Safety Services, LLC Atrium Environmental Health and Safety Services, LLC 11495 Sunset Hills Road, Suite 210 Reston, VA 20190 November 1, 2012 Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Final Report Noise Control Methods for Shipbuilding; NSRP Agreement No. 2012‐424 November 1, 2012 Page 2 of 14 Abstract Noise control has always been a big issue in shipyards. OSHA regulations for Occupational Exposure to Noise in 29CFR 1910.95 define specific requirements for shipyard employment, including surveillance, audiometric testing, training and use of approved PPE for exposures exceeding 85 dBA over a full shift. Experience has demonstrated that uncontrolled exposure represents a major loss-control issue by contributing to Noise-Induced Hearing Loss (NIHL), citations, lower productivity and costly compensation claims. A wide variety of equipment and operations commonly found in shipbuilding have the potential to produce excessive noise levels requiring OSHA compliance action and the use hearing protection unless employers have sampling data to document their equipment operates below the action thresholds. The goal of this project was to accurately measure and characterize representative noise levels generated by common shipyard manufacturing and maintenance processes, to define both representative exposure levels and to evaluate and describe the most effective control methods which are currently in place. This work is designed to promote effective and beneficial technology transfer, so that techniques and processes that may have been proven in one or two locations may be passed along to other sites to promote noise exposure reduction, where possible, with reduced trial-and-error, better innovation and ultimately, reduced exposure time before implementation. -
Managing Noise and Preventing Hearing Loss at Work Code of Practice 2021 Page 2 of 54
Managing noise and preventing hearing loss at work Code of Practice 2021 PN12640 ISBN Creative Commons This copyright work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International licence. To view a copy of this licence, visit creativecommons.org/licenses. In essence, you are free to copy, communicate and adapt the work for non-commercial purposes, as long as you attribute the work to Safe Work Australia and abide by the other licence terms. Managing noise and preventing hearing loss at work Code of Practice 2021 Page 2 of 54 Contents Foreword ................................................................................................................................... 4 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 5 1.1 Who has health and safety duties in relation to noise? .......................................... 5 1.2 What is involved in managing noise and preventing hearing loss?........................ 7 1.3 Information, training, instruction and supervision ................................................... 8 2. Noise and its effects on health and safety ..................................................................... 9 2.1 How does hearing loss occur? ................................................................................ 9 2.2 How much noise is too much? ................................................................................ 9 2.3 Other effects of noise............................................................................................ -
Practice Designing out Hazards in the Real World
Prevention Through Design Peer-Reviewed Practice Designing Out Hazards in the Real World By Anjali Lamba IOSH is leading a national initiative, development, implementation, employee training launched in July 2007, called Prevention and surveillance (Schulte & Heidel, 2009). NThrough Design (PTD). This initiative has As awareness of the PTD concept grows, more engaged the government, academia and industry SH&E professionals are calling for a concerted em- in promoting the concept of designing out and phasis on the engineering and technical aspects minimizing occupational risks. Following is a com- of a safe design during the planning phase, which prehensive definition of PTD: reduces risks and minimizes hazards throughout The optimal method of preventing oc- a facility’s life. This requirement is illustrated by a cupational illnesses, injuries and fatal- recent request for proposal for work at the Ports- ities is to “design out” the hazards and mouth Naval Shipyard that specified, “If it is not risks; thereby, eliminating the need to feasible to eliminate or prevent the need to work control them during work operations. at heights with its subsequent exposure to fall haz- This approach involves the design of ards, control measures shall be included in the de- tools, equipment, systems, work pro- sign to protect personnel conducting maintenance cesses and facilities in order to reduce work after completion of the project.” or eliminate, hazards associated with Research conducted in the U.S., European Union and some countries in the British Commonwealth IN BRIEF work. (Young-Corbett, 2011) has linked a good percentage of construction inju- •This article provides real- The purpose of PTD is to eliminate haz- ries and fatalities to decisions made before any con- world examples of preven- ards and reduce risk at the source by con- struction work started. -
Acoustical News—Usa
ACOUSTICAL NEWS—USA Elaine Moran Acoustical Society of America, Suite 1NO1, 2 Huntington Quadrangle, Melville, NY 11747-4502 Editor’s Note: Readers of the journal are encouraged to submit news items on awards, appointments, and other activities about themselves or their colleagues. Deadline dates for news items and notices are 2 months prior to publication. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 120 ͑3͒, September 20060001-4966/2006/120͑3͒/1133/20/$22.50 © 2006 Acoustical Society of America 1133 1134 J. Acoust. Soc. Am., Vol. 120, No. 3, September 2006 Annual Reports of Technical Committees Award in Animal Bioacoustics for her paper “Sound production patterns from humpback whales in a high latitude foraging area.” In Providence, we ͑See October issue for additional report͒ had two student paper award winners, Charlotte Kotas ͑Georgia Institute of Technology͒ for her paper “Are acoustically induced flows relevant in fish Acoustical Oceanography hearing?” and Anthony Petrites ͑Brown University͒ for his paper “Echolo- Fall 2005 Meeting (Minneapolis, MN). The Technical Committee on cating big brown bats shorten interpulse intervals when flying in high-clutter Acoustical Oceanography ͑AO͒ sponsored two special sessions: ͑1͒ “Inver- environments.” Lee Miller ͑University of Southern Denmark͒ and Bertel sion Using Ambient Noise Sources,” organized by Peter Gerstoft ͑Marine Møhl ͑Aarhus University͒ were both elevated to Fellow status. Physical Laboratory, Scripps͒; and ͑2͒ “Ocean Ecosystem Measurements,” AB sponsored or cosponsored three special sessions at the Minneapo- cosponsored by Animal Bioacoustics ͑AB͒ and organized by Whit Au ͑Ha- lis meeting. These include Cognition in the Acoustic Behavior of Animals waii Inst. of Marine Biology͒ and Van Holliday ͑BAE Systems͒. -
Hearing Loss Prevention, Chapter 296-817
Chapter 296-817 WAC Introduction Hearing Loss Prevention (Noise) _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Chapter 296-817 WAC Hearing Loss Prevention (Noise) (Form Number 414-117-000) This book contains rules for Safety Standards for hearing loss prevention (Noise), as adopted under the Washington Industrial Safety and Health Act of 1973 (Chapter 49.17 RCW). The rules in this book are effective December 2015. A brief promulgation history, set within brackets at the end of this chapter, gives statutory authority, administrative order of promulgation, and date of adoption of filing. TO RECEIVE E-MAIL UPDATES: Sign up at https://public.govdelivery.com/accounts/WADLI/subscriber/new?topic_id=WADLI_19 TO PRINT YOUR OWN PAPER COPY OR TO VIEW THE RULE ONLINE: Go to https://www.lni.wa.gov/safety-health/safety-rules/rules-by-chapter/?chapter=817/ DOSH CONTACT INFORMATION: Physical address: 7273 Linderson Way Tumwater, WA 98501-5414 (Located off I-5 Exit 101 south of Tumwater.) Mailing address: DOSH Standards and Information PO Box 44810 Olympia, WA 98504-4810 Telephone: 1-800-423-7233 For all L&I Contact information, visit https://www.lni.wa.gov/agency/contact/ Also available on the L&I Safety & Health website: DOSH Core Rules Other General Workplace Safety & Health Rules Industry and Task-Specific Rules Proposed Rules and Hearings Newly Adopted Rules and New Rule Information DOSH Directives (DD’s) See http://www.lni.wa.gov/Safety-Health/ Chapter 296-817 WAC Table of Contents Hearing Loss Prevention (Noise) _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Chapter 296-817 WAC Safety Standards for Hearing Loss Prevention (Noise) WAC Page WAC 296-817-099 Noise definitions. -
Section 31 – Hearing Loss Prevention Program
Reclamation Safety and Health Standards May 2020 Section 31: Hearing Loss Prevention Program Section 31 Hearing Loss Prevention Program 31.1 Scope This section establishes minimum requirements for a Reclamation Hearing Loss Prevention Program (HLPP) to ensure safety and occupational health hazards related to hearing are appropriately addressed. The HLPP applies to all employees working at or visiting facilities who are exposed to noise at or above 85 decibels, A scale (dBA), for an 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA) using a 3-dBA exchange rate. 31.2 General Requirements 31.2.1 3 dB Exchange Rate Reclamation shall use the more protective American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienist (ACGIH) Threshold Limit Value (TLV) exchange rate of 3 dB to be proactive in reducing noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) as shown in Table 31-1. TABLE 31-1. ACGIH 3 dB Exchange Rate Time to ACGIH 3 dB Reach 100% Exchange Rate Noise Dose Exposure Level 10 hours 84 8 hours 85 4 hours 88 2 hours 91 1 hour 94 30 min 97 15 min 100 31.2.2 Controls As feasible, engineering and administrative controls shall be implemented as the first line of defense when employees are exposed to sound levels greater than an 8-hour TWA of 85 dBA. Hearing protection devices (HPDs) shall be used when engineering and/or administrative controls fail to reduce the sound levels below the 8-hour TWA of 85 dBA. 31.2.3 Exposure Limit An exposure of 85 dBA, based on an 8-hour TWA, shall be used when determining if personal dosimetry results have been exceeded. -
Acknowledgements Acknowl
1139 Acknowledgements Acknowl. B.8 Nonlinear Acoustics in Fluids Frances deRook, Lingyun Huang, John Kucewicz, Marla by Werner Lauterborn, Thomas Kurz, Paun, Siddhartha Sikdar, Shahram Vaezy, and Todd Iskander Akhatov Zwink. The authors would like to thank U. Parlitz, R. Geisler, D. Kröninger, K. Köhler, and D. Schanz for stimulat- G.23 Noise ing discussions and help with the manuscript, either by George C. Maling, Jr. compiling tables or designing figures. The author would like to thank the following individ- uals who read portions of the manuscript and made C.9 Acoustics in Halls for Speech and Music many helpful suggestions for changes and inclusion by Anders Christian Gade of additional material: Douglas Barrett, Elliott Berger, The author of this chapter owes deep thanks to Jerald Lawrence Finegold, Robert Hellweg, Uno Ingard, Alan R. Hyde for his constant support throughout the prepa- Marsh, Christopher Menge, and Matthew Nobile, and ration of this chapter and for detailed comments and Paul Schomer. suggestions for improvements in content and language. H.24 Microphones and Their Calibration Comments from Leo Beranek and Thomas Rossing have by George S. K. Wong also been very valuable. The author would like to thank the Acoustical Society of America, and the International Electrotechnical Com- D.13 Psychoacoustics mission (IEC) for permission to use data give in their by Brian C. J. Moore publications. Special acknowledgement is given to the I thank Brian Glasberg, Aleksander Sek and Chris Plack Journal of the Acoustical Society of Japan (JASJ) for for assistance in producing figures. I also thank William duplicating data from their publication. -
NIOSH Efforts to Address Hazards in Construction
NIOSH Efforts to Address Hazards in Construction G. Scott Earnest, Ph.D., P.E., C.S.P. Deputy Director, Office of Construction Safety and Health NORA Construction Coordinator National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health NIOSH National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Part of CDC Conduct research and make recommendations for the prevention of work-related injury and illness. Construction Program since 1990 In-house researchers External “National Construction Center” Academic research support congress.nsc.org Occupational Safety & Health Framework Research and Regulation/Enforcement Prevention Recommendations Department of Labor Department of (DOL) Health and Human Services (HHS) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Mine Safety Occupational (CDC) and Health Safety and Health Administration Administration (MSHA) (OSHA) National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) congress.nsc.org NIOSH Facilities congress.nsc.org Education and Research Centers congress.nsc.org NIOSH Construction Program Mission To eliminate construction fatalities, injuries, and illnesses through a focused program of research and prevention Program Addresses All Types of Construction Buildings-Skyscrapers Specialty Trades Buildings-Homes Heavy and Civil Construction Program Structure and Focus NIOSH Construction Safety and Health Program Intramural National Extramural Research Construction Investigator- Center Basic Research initiated Grants Surveillance Innovative Ideas Methods Research Industry Characterization Opportunities -
National News
National News Elaine Moran Acoustical Society of America Melville, New York 11747 Applied Science. Miller joined the Engineers in 1998, and a Fellow of the Washington University faculty in 1970 American Institute of Medical and as assistant professor of physics. Since Biological Engineering in 2000. the early 1970s, he has led a team of In 2004, the Acoustical Society of investigators who have focused on America awarded Miller the Silver using ultrasound to determine the Medal in Biomedical Ultrasound/ physics of normal and diseased hearts. Bioresponse to Vibration “for contribu- Professor Miller’s research tions to ultrasonic tissue characteriza- focuses on the physics of anisotropic, tion and quantitative echocardiogra- inherently inhomogeneous media. phy.” Among other honors, Miller was These systematic studies of the the recipient of two Industrial Research anisotropic properties of the heart have and Development IR-100 awards and led to fundamentally new insights. In served as a Sigma Xi National Lecturer. 1998 the National Institutes of Health Miller has been a mentor to 32 doctoral grant supporting this research was and post-doctoral students in ultrasonic James G. Miller awarded MERIT status, which is physics, many of whom have gone on to James G. Miller receives designed to “provide long-term, stable prominent careers. He received the Achievement Award support to investigators whose research Emerson Excellence in Teaching Award James G. Miller has been named competence and productivity are dis- from the Emerson Electric Co. in