DOCSLIB.ORG

2018-09-20-Om-Moose-Factory-Fn

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2018-09-20-Om-Moose-Factory-Fn Climate Change Impacts on Water and Wastewater Infrastructure at Moose Factory Final Report July 24, 2018 Project No. 163401448 Prepared by: Developed in partnership with: Sign-off Sheet This document entitled Climate Change Impacts on Water and Wastewater Infrastructure at Moose Factory was prepared by Stantec Consulting Ltd. (“Stantec”) for the account of Ontario First Nations Technical Services Corporation (OFNTSC) (the “Client”). Any reliance on this document by any third party is strictly prohibited. The material in it reflects Stantec’s professional judgment in light of the scope, schedule and other limitations stated in the document and in the contract between Stantec and the Client. The opinions in the document are based on conditions and information existing at the time the document was published and do not take into account any subsequent changes. In preparing the document, Stantec did not verify information supplied to it by others. Any use which a third party makes of this document is the responsibility of such third party. Such third party agrees that Stantec shall not be responsible for costs or damages of any kind, if any, suffered by it or any other third party as a result of decisions made or actions taken based on this document. Prepared by (signature) Guy Félio, Ph.D., P.Eng. Prepared by (signature) Wayne L.E. Penno, MBA, P.Eng. Reviewed by (signature) Jordan Stewart, P.Eng. Approved by (signature) Adrien Comeau, M.Eng, P.Eng CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS ON WATER AND WASTEWATER INFRASTRUCTURE AT MOOSE FACTORY Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ I ABBREVIATIONS ..................................................................................................................... III 1.0 INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................1.1 1.1 COMMUNITY DESCRIPTION ......................................................................................1.1 1.2 SCOPE OF THE STUDY ..............................................................................................1.3 1.3 PROJECT TIMELINE ...................................................................................................1.3 1.4 PROJECT TEAM ..........................................................................................................1.3 2.0 STEP 1: PROJECT DEFINITION .................................................................................2.1 2.1 CLIMATE RELATED CONCERNS ...............................................................................2.1 2.2 INFRASTRUCTURE TO BE CONSIDERED .................................................................2.3 2.3 TIME HORIZON FOR THE STUDY ..............................................................................2.4 3.0 STEP 2: DATA COLLECTION .................................................................................... 3.1 3.1 INVENTORY OF INFRASTRUCTURE COMPONENTS .............................................. 3.1 3.1.1 Potable Water System ................................................................................. 3.1 3.1.2 Wastewater System .................................................................................... 3.6 3.2 CONDITION OF INFRASTRUCTURE COMPONENTS ............................................... 3.8 3.3 CLIMATE CONSIDERATIONS ...................................................................................3.12 3.3.1 Climate Trends and Projections ................................................................. 3.13 3.3.2 Climate Elements Considered to Affect the Infrastructure .......................... 3.15 4.0 STEP 3: COMPLETE THE RISK ASSESSMENT ....................................................... 4.1 4.1 RISK THRESHOLDS ................................................................................................... 4.1 4.2 INFRASTRUCTURE RESPONSE ............................................................................... 4.2 4.3 CLIMATE PROBABILITY SCORING ........................................................................... 4.3 4.4 INFRASTRUCTURE SEVERITY SCORING ................................................................ 4.5 4.5 RISK ASSESSMENT ................................................................................................... 4.5 4.5.1 Infrastructure Components Evaluated ......................................................... 4.5 4.5.2 Risk Screening Process .............................................................................. 4.7 4.5.3 Summary of Risk Results ............................................................................ 4.7 4.5.4 Influence of the Infrastructure Condition ...................................................... 4.9 4.6 COMMUNITY IMPACTS FROM INFRASTRUCTURE RISKS ......................................4.9 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .............................................................5.1 LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Timeline for the Project ...............................................................................................1.3 Table 2: Project Team ..............................................................................................................1.3 Table 3: INAC's ICMS, Canadian Infrastructure Report Card (CIRC) Condition Rating Scales and Description (from City of Edmonton) ........................................................3.9 Table 4: ICMS Data on Assets to be Considered in the Climate Risks Assessment ............... 3.10 i CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS ON WATER AND WASTEWATER INFRASTRUCTURE AT MOOSE FACTORY Table 5: Principal Climate Elements Selected by the Project Team for the Analysis ............... 3.15 Table 6: Risk Thresholds ..........................................................................................................4.2 Table 7: FN PIEVC Probability Scoring ....................................................................................4.3 Table 8: Probability Scores for Selected Climate Events ..........................................................4.4 Table 9: Infrastructure Severity Scoring Developed by the Project Team..................................4.5 Table 10: Infrastructure Assessed ............................................................................................4.6 Table 11: Summary of Moderate and High Risks......................................................................4.8 Table 12: Summary of Risks for Infrastructure Replaced at the End of its Design Life and is Well Maintained vs. Infrastructure that is Deteriorated ............................................4.9 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Satellite view of Moose Factory and Surrounding Area (Source: Google Earth) .........1.2 Figure 2: Article from CBC News regarding the flooding of May 2013.......................................2.2 Figure 3: Photo of 1976 Flooding in Moose Factory provided by Project Team Member ...........2.2 Figure 4: Working List of Components of Water Treatment Plant Components Developed at Workshop 1 ..........................................................................................................2.3 Figure 5: Photo of Water Treatment Plant Building and Reservoir taken during the September 26, 2017 Site Visit as part of Workshop 1 ...............................................2.4 Figure 6: Moose Factory Water Treatment, Storage and Distribution Piping System (Source: Moose Factory Water Treatment Plant – Feasibility Study, OCWA 2015)........................................................................................................................3.2 Figure 7: Raw Water Intake and Low Lift Pump Building ..........................................................3.3 Figure 8: Raw Water Intake Structure – River Level Fluctuations .............................................3.4 Figure 9: Filter System Inside the WTP ....................................................................................3.5 Figure 10: SCADA Screen Showing the WTP Operations ........................................................3.6 Figure 11: Moose Factory – Sewer Main and Treatment Lagoons Layout (Source: ACRS Report by Saulteaux Consulting and Engineering. Inspected Summer 2016)........................................................................................................................3.7 Figure 12: Typical Lift Station, Lagoon Cell, Valve Chamber and Blower Building ....................3.8 Figure 13: Average Monthly Temperature and Precipitation from Moosonee UA Station ........3.12 Figure 14: Mean Daily Temperature for Summer - Historical Trend and Future Climate Projection (Moosonee Weather Station, RCP 8.5) ..................................................3.13 Figure 15: Mean Daily Temperature for Winter - Historical Trend and Future Climate Projection (Moosonee Weather Station, RCP 8.5) ..................................................3.14 Figure 16: Summer Precipitation - Historical Trend and Future Climate Projection (Moosonee Weather Station, RCP 8.5) ..................................................................3.14 Figure 17: Winter Precipitation - Historical Trend and Future Climate Projection (Moosonee Weather Station, RCP 8.5) ..................................................................3.15 Figure 18: FN PIEVC Protocol Risk Assessment Process Flowchart ........................................4.1 LIST OF APPENDICES APPENDIX A WORKSHOP PRESENTATIONS ..............................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • POPULATION PROFILE 2006 Census Porcupine Health Unit
    POPULATION PROFILE 2006 Census Porcupine Health Unit Kapuskasing Iroquois Falls Hearst Timmins Porcupine Cochrane Moosonee Hornepayne Matheson Smooth Rock Falls Population Profile Foyez Haque, MBBS, MHSc Public Health Epidemiologist published by: Th e Porcupine Health Unit Timmins, Ontario October 2009 ©2009 Population Profile - 2006 Census Acknowledgements I would like to express gratitude to those without whose support this Population Profile would not be published. First of all, I would like to thank the management committee of the Porcupine Health Unit for their continuous support of and enthusiasm for this publication. Dr. Dennis Hong deserves a special thank you for his thorough revision. Thanks go to Amanda Belisle for her support with editing, creating such a wonderful cover page, layout and promotion of the findings of this publication. I acknowledge the support of the Statistics Canada for history and description of the 2006 Census and also the definitions of the variables. Porcupine Health Unit – 1 Population Profile - 2006 Census 2 – Porcupine Health Unit Population Profile - 2006 Census Table of Contents Acknowledgements . 1 Preface . 5 Executive Summary . 7 A Brief History of the Census in Canada . 9 A Brief Description of the 2006 Census . 11 Population Pyramid. 15 Appendix . 31 Definitions . 35 Table of Charts Table 1: Population distribution . 12 Table 2: Age and gender characteristics. 14 Figure 3: Aboriginal status population . 16 Figure 4: Visible minority . 17 Figure 5: Legal married status. 18 Figure 6: Family characteristics in Ontario . 19 Figure 7: Family characteristics in Porcupine Health Unit area . 19 Figure 8: Low income cut-offs . 20 Figure 11: Mother tongue .
    [Show full text]
  • Zone a – Prescribed Northern Zones / Zones Nordiques Visées Par Règlement Place Names Followed by Numbers Are Indian Reserves
    Northern Residents Deductions – Places in Prescribed Zones / Déductions pour les habitants de régions éloignées – Endroits situés dans les zones visées par règlement Zone A – Prescribed northern zones / Zones nordiques visées par règlement Place names followed by numbers are Indian reserves. If you live in a place that is not listed in this publication and you think it is in a prescribed zone, contact us. / Les noms suivis de chiffres sont des réserves indiennes. Communiquez avec nous si l’endroit où vous habitez ne figure pas dans cette publication et que vous croyez qu’il se situe dans une zone visée par règlement. Yukon, Nunavut, and the Northwest Territories / Yukon, Nunavut et Territoires du Nord-Ouest All places in the Yukon, Nunavut, and the Northwest Territories are located in a prescribed northern zone. / Tous les endroits situés dans le Yukon, le Nunavut et les Territoires du Nord-Ouest se trouvent dans des zones nordiques visées par règlement. British Columbia / Colombie-Britannique Andy Bailey Recreation Good Hope Lake Nelson Forks Tahltan Liard River 3 Area Gutah New Polaris Mine Taku McDames Creek 2 Atlin Hyland Post Niteal Taku River McDonald Lake 1 Atlin Park Hyland Ranch Old Fort Nelson Tamarack Mosquito Creek 5 Atlin Recreation Area Hyland River Park Pavey Tarahne Park Muddy River 1 Bear Camp Iskut Pennington Telegraph Creek One Mile Point 1 Ben-My-Chree Jacksons Pleasant Camp Tetsa River Park Prophet River 4 Bennett Kahntah Porter Landing Toad River Salmon Creek 3 Boulder City Kledo Creek Park Prophet River Trutch Silver
    [Show full text]
  • Directory of Institutions
    Ministry of Government Services Information Access & Privacy Directory of Institutions What is the Directory of Institutions? The Directory of Institutions lists and provides contact information for: • Ontario government ministries, agencies, community colleges and universities covered by FIPPA • Municipalities and other local public sector organizations such as school boards, library boards and police services covered by MFIPPA These organizations are all called "institutions" under the Acts. The address of the FIPPA or MFIPPA Coordinator for each institution is provided to assist you in directing requests for information to the correct place. FIPPA Coordinators • Provincial Ministries • Provincial Agencies, Boards and Commissions • Colleges and Universities • Hospitals MFIPPA Coordinators • Boards of Health • Community Development Corporations • Conservation Authorities • Entertainment Boards • District Social Services Administration Boards • Local Housing Corporations • Local Roads Boards • Local Services Boards • Municipal Corporations • Planning Boards • Police Service Boards • Public Library Boards • School Boards • Transit Commissions FIPPA Coordinators Provincial Ministries MINISTRY OF ABORIGINAL AFFAIRS Freedom of Information and Privacy Coordinator 160 Bloor Street East, 4th Floor Toronto, Ontario M7A 2E6 Phone: 416-326-4740 MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE, FOOD AND RURAL AFFAIRS Freedom of Information and Privacy Coordinator 2nd Floor NW, 1 Stone Rd. W. Guelph, ON N1G 4Y2 Phone: 519-826-3100 ARCHIVES OF ONTARIO Freedom of Information and Privacy Coordinator 134 Ian Macdonald Blvd Toronto, ON M7A 2C5 Phone: 416-327-1563 MINISTRY OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Freedom of Information and Privacy Coordinator McMurty-Scott Building 5th Floor, 720 Bay St. Toronto, ON M5G 2K1 Phone: 416-326-4305 CABINET OFFICE Freedom of Information and Privacy Coordinator Whitney Block, Room 4500 99 Wellesley St.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fiddlers of James Bay: Transatlantic Flows and Musical Indigenization Among the James Bay Cree
    The Fiddlers of James Bay: Transatlantic Flows and Musical Indigenization among the James Bay Cree FRANCES WILKINS Abstract: Fiddle music and dancing have formed a major component of the social lives of the Algonquian 57-99. 40 (1): First Nations Cree population living in the James Bay region of Ontario and Québec since the instrument and its associated repertoire were introduced to the region by British (and most notably Scottish) employees of the Hudson’s Bay Company who travelled across the Atlantic on ships from the late 17th to the 20th MUSICultures century. Based on archival research and ongoing fieldwork in the region since 2011, this article aims to explore this transatlantic musical migration from the British Isles to James Bay and the reshaping of Scottish fiddle music and dance through indigenization and incorporation into the Cree cultural milieu. By examining this area of cultural flow, the article seeks to engage with current themes in ethnomusicology on the subject and add to the growing body of knowledge surrounding them. Résumé : La danse et le violon ont constitué une composante majeure de la vie sociale de la population algonquienne de la Première nation cri vivant dans la région de la baie James, en Ontario et au Québec, puisque cet instrument et le répertoire qui lui était associé furent introduits dans la région par les employés britanniques (et plus particulièrement écossais) de la Compagnie de la Baie d’Hudson, qui ont traversé l’Atlantique à partir de la fin du 17e siècle jusqu’au 20e siècle. Cet article, qui se fonde sur une recherche en archives et un travail de terrain continu dans la région depuis 2011, cherche à explorer cette migration musicale transatlantique depuis les îles britanniques jusqu’à la baie James, ainsi que le remodelage et la reconstitution de la musique au violon et de la danse écossaise par le biais de leur indigénisation dans le milieu culturel cri.
    [Show full text]
  • Working As a Service Provider in Moosonee and Moose Factory Here to Stay, Gone Tomorrow
    WORKING AS A SERVICE PROVIDER IN MOOSONEE AND MOOSE FACTORY HERE TO STAY, GONE TOMORROW: WORKING AS A SERVICE PROVIDER IN MOOSONEE AND MOOSE FACTORY By JENNIFER MARIE DAWSON, B.A. A Thesis Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in Partial FulfIllment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts McMaster University (c) Copyright by Jennifer Marie Dawson, September 1995 MASTER OF ARTS (1995) McMASTER UNIVERSITY (Anthropology) Hamilton, Ontario TITLE: Here to Stay, Gone Tomorrow: Working as a Service Provider in Moosonee and Moose Factory AUTHOR: Jennifer Marie Dawson, B.A. (McMaster University) SUPERVISOR: Professor Wayne Warry NUMBER OF PAGES: iv, 264 11 ABSTRACT The experience of a service provider living and working in Moosonee and Moose Factory is largely determined by whether the individual is Cree and from these communities, or is non-Native and from "the south". This study examines these experiences in terms of stress and coping, loosely adopting and occasionally critiquing Lazarus and Folkman's (1984) definitions of these concepts. The cultural and historical factors which influence stress and coping are emphasized without denying the importance of contemporary circumstances in these politically and socially turbulent communities. Non-Native or "southern" service providers are outsiders. They are kept at a distance both by their own interpretation of and reaction to "difference" and by others who are suspicious of their motivations and commitment. Some cope with their outsider status by reinforcing it; they withdraw from active personal and professional participation in community. But instead of refusing to change and clinging desperately to what is familiar, those southerners who have remained the longest in these northern locales are willing to acknowledge the relevance and rewards of different ways of living and working.
    [Show full text]
  • LOUIS ST-LAURENT When Governments Got Things Done
    MARCH 2021 The Legacy of LOUIS ST-LAURENT When governments got things done Also INSIDE: An Israel-Iran Canada’s lacklustre Crisis in academic Solving the Maritime peace deal? COVID response freedom fishery dispute 1 PublishedPublished by by the the Macdonald-Laurier Macdonald-Laurier Institute Institute PublishedBrianBrian Lee LeeBrianby Crowley, Crowley,the Lee Macdonald-Laurier Crowley,Managing Managing Managing Director, Director, Director [email protected] [email protected] Institute David Watson,JamesJames DeputyAnderson, Anderson, Managing Managing Managing Director, Editor, Editor, Editorial Inside Inside Policy and Policy Operations Brian Lee Crowley, Managing Director, [email protected] David McDonough, Deputy Editor James Anderson,ContributingContributing Managing writers:Editor, writers: Inside Policy Contributing writers: ThomasThomas S. S.Axworthy Axworthy PastAndrewAndrew contributors Griffith Griffith BenjaminBenjamin Perrin Perrin Thomas S. Axworthy Andrew Griffith Benjamin Perrin Mary-Jane BennettDonaldDonald Barry Barry Jeremy DepowStanleyStanley H. H. Hartt HarttMarcus Kolga MikeMike J.Priaro Berkshire Priaro Miller Massimo BergaminiDonald Barry Peter DeVries Stanley H. HarttAudrey Laporte Mike Priaro Jack Mintz Derek BurneyKenKen Coates Coates Brian Dijkema PaulPaul Kennedy KennedyBrad Lavigne ColinColin RobertsonRobert Robertson P. Murphy Ken Coates Paul Kennedy Colin Robertson Charles Burton Ujjal Dosanjh Ian Lee Dwight Newman BrianBrian Lee Lee Crowley Crowley AudreyAudrey Laporte Laporte RogerRoger Robinson Robinson Catherine
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on Cynipid Galls, Ground Beetles and Ground-Dwelling Spiders Collected at Fort Severn, Ontario JOSEPH D
    ARCTIC VOL. 56, NO. 2 (JUNE 2003) P. 159–167 Notes on Cynipid Galls, Ground Beetles and Ground-Dwelling Spiders Collected at Fort Severn, Ontario JOSEPH D. SHORTHOUSE,1 HENRI GOULET2 and DAVID P. SHORTHOUSE3 (Received 22 November 2001; accepted in revised form 19 August 2002) ABSTRACT. A brief collecting trip to Fort Severn, Ontario (55˚59' N, 87˚38' W), in May 2001 revealed galls of three species of cynipid wasps (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae) on the wild rose Rosa acicularis. Roses and cynipid galls occur along the banks of the Severn River above the tree line because of clay deposits, heat, and rafts of vegetation carried north by the river. Ground beetles and spiders were collected with pitfall traps. Our identification of 15 species of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae), two of them new records for Ontario, and 11 species of ground spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae), all new records for northwestern Ontario, indicates that the invertebrate fauna in the area has been poorly studied. Roads and trails away from Fort Severn, regularly scheduled airline service, and convenient accommodations make the area ideal for biological studies. Key words: cynipid galls, wild roses, ground beetles, ground-dwelling spiders, Fort Severn RÉSUMÉ. Une brève sortie de prélèvement à Fort Severn, en Ontario (55˚ 59' de lat. N., 87˚ 38' de long. O.), effectuée en mai 2001 a révélé l’existence de galles de trois espèces de cynips du rosier (hyménoptères: cynipidés) sur le rosier aciculaire Rosa acicularis. On trouve ce dernier et les galles du rosier le long des rives de la Severn au-dessus de la limite forestière en raison des dépôts d’argile, de la chaleur et de la végétation flottante que transporte la rivière en direction du Nord.
    [Show full text]
  • Targeted Residential Fire Risk Reduction a Summary of At-Risk Aboriginal Areas in Canada
    Targeted Residential Fire Risk Reduction A Summary of At-Risk Aboriginal Areas in Canada Len Garis, Sarah Hughan, Paul Maxim, and Alex Tyakoff October 2016 Executive Summary Despite the steady reduction in rates of fire that have been witnessed in Canada in recent years, ongoing research has demonstrated that there continue to be striking inequalities in the way in which fire risk is distributed through society. It is well-established that residential dwelling fires are not distributed evenly through society, but that certain sectors in Canada experience disproportionate numbers of incidents. Oftentimes, it is the most vulnerable segments of society who face the greatest risk of fire and can least afford the personal and property damage it incurs. Fire risks are accentuated when property owners or occupiers fail to install and maintain fire and life safety devices such smoke alarms and carbon monoxide detectors in their homes. These life saving devices are proven to be highly effective, inexpensive to obtain and, in most cases, Canadian fire services will install them for free. A key component of driving down residential fire rates in Canadian cities, towns, hamlets and villages is the identification of communities where fire risk is greatest. Using the internationally recognized Home Safe methodology described in this study, the following Aboriginal and Non- Aboriginal communities in provinces and territories across Canada are determined to be at heightened risk of residential fire. These communities would benefit from a targeted smoke alarm give-away program and public education campaign to reduce the risk of residential fires and ensure the safety and well-being of all Canadian citizens.
    [Show full text]
  • ORN Road Net Element
    Unclassified Land Information Ontario Data Description ORN Road Net Element Disclaimer This technical documentation has been prepared by the Ministry of Natural Resources (the “Ministry”), representing Her Majesty the Queen in right of Ontario. Although every effort has been made to verify the information, this document is presented as is, and the Ministry makes no guarantees, representations or warranties with respect to the information contained within this document, either express or implied, arising by law or otherwise, including but not limited to, effectiveness, completeness, accuracy, or fitness for purpose. The Ministry is not liable or responsible for any loss or harm of any kind arising from use of this information. For an accessible version of this document, please contact Land Information Ontario at (705) 755 1878 or [email protected] ©Queens Printer for Ontario, 2019 LIO Class Description ORN Road Net Element Class Short Name: ORNELEM Version Number: 2 Class Description: The basic centreline road network features, which forms the spatial framework for the ORN. Road net elements are bound by a junction on each end, except for cul-de-sacs (loops) where there is only one junction. The ORN is segmented at real-world intersections (junctions) on the ground. Abstract Class Name: SPSLINEM Abstract Class Description: Spatial Single-Line With Measures: An object is represented by ONE and ONLY ONE line. All vertices along the arc have measures (values for x, y, m). Measures are required for dynamic segmentation/linear referencing. Example: Ontario Road Network road segments. Metadata URL: Tables in LIO Class: ORN Road Net Element ORN_ROAD_NET_ELEMENT_FT The basic centreline of road network features, which forms the spatial network of roads, composed of three types of road net elements, road element, ferry connection and virtual road.
    [Show full text]
  • “Moose Factory Is My Home”: Mocreebec's Struggle for Recognition and Self-Determination
    “Moose Factory Is My Home”: MoCreebec’s Struggle for Recognition and Self-Determination A Thesis Submitted to the College of Graduate Studies and Research In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of the Masters of Arts in Anthropology In the Department of Archaeology and Anthropology By Kota Kimura Copyright Kota Kimura, May 2016. All rights reserved Permission to Use In presenting this thesis/dissertation in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Postgraduate degree from the University of Saskatchewan, I agree that the Libraries of this University may make it freely available for inspection. I further agree that permission for copying of this the- sis/dissertation in any manner, in whole or in part, for scholarly purposes may be granted by the professor or professors who supervised my thesis/dissertation work or, in their absence, by the Head of the Department or the Dean of the College in which my thesis work was done. It is under- stood that any copying or publication or use of this thesis/dissertation or parts thereof for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. It is also understood that due recognition shall be given to me and to the University of Saskatchewan in any scholarly use which may be made of any material in my thesis/dissertation. Requests for permission to copy or to make other uses of materials in this thesis/dissertation in whole or part should be addressed to: Dean College of Graduate Studies and Research University of Saskatchewan 107 Administration Place Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5A2 Canada i Abstract This thesis, based on my ethnographic research in Moose Factory, Ontario documents the his- tory of MoCreebec people from the early Twentieth Century to the present.
    [Show full text]
  • Timmins—James Bay 93
    PEAWANUCK Hudson Bay POLAR BEAR Provincial Park DISTRICT OF KENORA, UNORGANIZED KENORA--RAINY RIVER ATTAWAPISKAT 91A WINISK RIVER Provincial Park WEBEQUIE FORT ALBANY 67 TIMMINS---JAMES BAY FORT ALBANY 67 M is s is a L a k e OTOSKWIN-ATTAWAPISKAT RIVER Provincial Park D T R TOWN OF MOOSONEE S Y H A B C FACTORIYR ISLAND 1 B MARTEN FALLS 65 TIDEWATER Provincial Park MOOSE FACTORY 68 FORT HOPE 64 ALBANY RIVER Provincial Park KESAGAMI Provincial Park OGOKI RIVER Provincial Park LITTLE CURRENT RIVER Provincial Park WILLIAMS ISLAND Provincial Park DISTRICT OF COCHRANE, UNORGANIZED CORAL RAPIDS Provincial Park Y SEDGMAN LAKE Provincial Park HW SEXTANT RAPIDS Provincial Park 4 ADAM CREEK Provincial Park 63 ke La a Ar MATTAGAMI RIVER BEACH AND AEOLIAN DEPOSIT Provincial Park 643 HWY NEW POST 69 AROLAND 83 N T WY WI 4 H N L 58 AK ES RD NAKINA MORAINE Provincial Park LITTLE ABITIBI Provincial Park FUSHIMI LAKE Provincial Park 6 C 6 CONSTANCE LAKE 92 L CASGRAIN 3 O GROUNDHOG RIVER WATERWAY Provincial Park HANLAN H U 5 T W 8 I E 3 Y R STODDART H GILL R W McCOWAN 5 EILBER D Y McMILLAN 8 STUDHOLME Y 1 C Y 3 1 8 W HW N H 1 W O 1 TOWN OF HEARST Y 0 H H N 1 TOWNSHIP OF MATTICE-VAL COTÉ W T 4 C D H 8 R E Y DEVITT R 5 E THORNING W S WAY M S R Y 1 11 1 B WY I HW IDINGTON E WILLIAMSON H Y KENDALL O Y W L 3 H G 8 H 5 N A N RENE BRUNELLE Provincial Park CH A Y THUNDER BAY--SUPERIOR NORTH 2 ANN A NORTH DRIFTWOOD RIVER Provincial Park AM R H TOWNSHIP OL F VAL R ITA-HARTY 5 R I T FAUQUIER D 7 D B Y 1 McCREA 9 GINOOGAMING FIRST NATIONH 3 P 6 H W LOWTHER I STAUNTON T D 1 Y TOWNSHIP OF MOONBEAM W 1 Y R Y 6 SHETLAND R D Y 2 H R S Y W TOWNSHIP OF OPASATIKA D D SEP MACHIN W 5 W SON R ST.
    [Show full text]
  • MOOSE CREE FIRST NATION's SPEAKING NOTES ON
    MOOSE CREE FIRST NATION’s SPEAKING NOTES ON PROTECTED AREAS TO THE FEDERAL STANDING COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT For presentation on October 18, 2016 Chief Patricia Faries Jack Rickard, Director of Lands and Resources ([email protected]) Introduction: Good afternoon, Thank you for this opportunity to share with the Committee our perspective on protected areas and conservation objectives. Also, I would like to acknowledge the traditional territory of the Algonquins of Pikwakanagan. It is an honour to come before you and share our thoughts as Indigenous People. My name is Patricia Faries and I am joined by our Director of Lands and Resources Jack Rickard. We are from the Moose Cree First Nation and we have recently made our reaffirmation of our Homelands Declaration on September 27, 2016. Our home community is located on Moose Factory Island within the Moose River Delta. Our Moose Cree Homelands extend from Hearst, Ontario in the west just beyond the Quebec border in the east, and from south of Highway 11 to points north toward the Albany River. “Homelands” are the areas that are determined by the MCFN citizens (Eh- lilu-wuk) which is inclusive generally of the historical occupancy and use of lands and watersheds in the Northeastern Ontario. The Moose Cree Homelands is comprised of static boundaries and covers approximately 60,000 sq. km. As the Moose Cree have determined, Homelands include surface and subsurface lands, water and air. The Homeland areas have been derived using Moose Cree Knowledge from our Elders and are based on continued presence of hunting, trapping and harvest grounds prior to the Ontario government trapline system existed.
    [Show full text]