DOCSLIB.ORG

Biography of King George III, the King Who Lost the American Colonies by Biography.Com, Adapted by Newsela Staff on 12.08.19 Word Count 695 Level 620L

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Biography of King George III, the King Who Lost the American Colonies by Biography.Com, Adapted by Newsela Staff on 12.08.19 Word Count 695 Level 620L Biography of King George III, the king who lost the American colonies By Biography.com, adapted by Newsela staff on 12.08.19 Word Count 695 Level 620L Image 1. This circa 1765 painting by Allan Ramsay depicts King George III in his coronation robes. Photo courtesy Art Gallery South Australia. King George III had a fascinating history as ruler of Great Britain. He ruled during troubled times, including the American Revolutionary War. King George III was the longest-ruling British monarch until Queen Victoria. Early Life George William Frederick was born June 4, 1738. He arrived before his due date. The sickly prince wasn't expected to live. Young George was strongly influenced by his primary teacher, John Stuart. He was a Scottish nobleman, known as Third Earl of Bute. He helped the young prince get over his shyness. Stuart advised George on many matters. This article is available at 5 reading levels at https://newsela.com. George's father died in 1751. Soon George took the title Duke of Edinburgh. He was just 12 years old. Three weeks later, he was made Prince of Wales by his grandfather, George II. This put him in line to inherit the throne. Shy And Inexperienced, George Becomes King In 1760, George's grandfather suddenly died. The 22-year-old became king. A year later, he married Charlotte Sophia. The couple enjoyed a 57-year marriage. They also had 15 children together. As king, George faced many troubles. A world war was ongoing. There were changing social and religious issues. Since 1754, Britain and France were fighting over land in North America. The Seven Years' War resulted. During that time, Lord Bute closely advised George III. Bute was now prime minister. The king was young and inexperienced. So Bute kept him away from key members of Parliament. However, Bute believed in King George III's holy right to rule. For this, Bute was criticized by other members of Parliament. Bute was eventually forced to quit. In 1763, George Grenville became King George's prime minister. The Seven Years' War ended. The British empire was deeply in debt. So, Grenville looked to the American colonies to obtain money. British troops were in North America protecting the colonists. So, Grenville believed the colonists should pay for British debt. King George agreed. He supported the Sugar Act of 1764 and the Stamp Act in 1765. But in the colonies, the Stamp Act was met with outrage and sometimes violence. The American Revolution The Stamp Act was repealed. However, Parliament passed the Declaratory Act in 1766. It stated the colonies must follow British Law. Parliament then proceeded to pass more tax laws. The protests in the colonies spread. By 1775, many colonists had had enough of Parliament's overreach. They formed the Second Continental Congress. They wrote a declaration of independence. The colonies and England were officially at war. By 1779, the war was a lost cause, yet the king insisted it had to be fought. He said he had to avoid rewarding disobedience. On October 19, 1781, French and American forces surrounded the British Army at Yorktown. This ended any chance for a British victory. The Treaty of Paris, in 1783, brought America's independence. Glory And Insanity King George III never recovered from the loss of the American colonies. He was bitter for many years. The British public was bitter with George, too. Yet, in 1783, he was able to turn disaster into triumph at home. Powerful ministers in Parliament hoped to make changes to the East India Company. This corporation carried out British business interests in other lands. Eventually, the company would take over these lands. It was known for unfair and brutal practices. This article is available at 5 reading levels at https://newsela.com. Originally, George supported changes to the company. But soon, he saw the reform as a way to continue Parliament's corrupt behavior. Any minister who supported this plan, he said, was his enemy. The bill was defeated. King George regained some of his popularity with the British people. In 1788, however, the king experienced severe mental illness. George III got better the following year. He navigated another war with France. George also oversaw Ireland's addition to the United Kingdom. Death By 1811, King George's mental illness returned. He was facing personal family tragedies and the pressures of ruling. The king could no longer lead. Parliament passed the Regency Act. That meant the fate of the empire fell on his oldest son, Prince George. George III died on January 29, 1820. This article is available at 5 reading levels at https://newsela.com..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • British Royal Banners 1199–Present
    British Royal Banners 1199 – Present Geoff Parsons & Michael Faul Abstract The presentation begins with the (accepted) date of 1199, the death of King Richard I, the first king known to have used the three gold lions on red. It continues to show how King Edward III added the French Royal Arms, consequent to his claim to the French throne. There is then the change from “France Ancient” to “France Modern” by King Henry IV in 1405, which set the pattern of the arms and the standard for the next 198 years. The story then proceeds to show how, over the ensuing 234 years, there were no fewer than six versions of the standard until the adoption of the present pattern in 1837. The presentation includes pictures of all the designs, noting that, in the early stages, the arms appeared more often as a surcoat than a flag. There is also some anecdotal information regarding the various patterns. Anne (1702–1714) Proceedings of the 24th International Congress of Vexillology, Washington, D.C., USA 1–5 August 2011 © 2011 North American Vexillological Association (www.nava.org) 799 British Royal Banners 1199 – Present Figure 1 Introduction The presentation begins with the (accepted) date of 1199, the death of King Richard I, the first king known to have used the three gold lions on red. Although we often refer to these flags as Royal Standards, strictly speaking, they are not standard but heraldic banners which are based on the Coats of Arms of the British Monarchs. Figure 2 William I (1066–1087) The first use of the coats of arms would have been exactly that, worn as surcoats by medieval knights.
    [Show full text]
  • Victoria: the Irg L Who Would Become Queen Lindsay R
    Volume 18 Article 7 May 2019 Victoria: The irG l Who Would Become Queen Lindsay R. Richwine Gettysburg College Class of 2021 Follow this and additional works at: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/ghj Part of the History Commons Share feedback about the accessibility of this item. Richwine, Lindsay R. (2019) "Victoria: The irlG Who Would Become Queen," The Gettysburg Historical Journal: Vol. 18 , Article 7. Available at: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/ghj/vol18/iss1/7 This open access article is brought to you by The uC pola: Scholarship at Gettysburg College. It has been accepted for inclusion by an authorized administrator of The uC pola. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Victoria: The irG l Who Would Become Queen Abstract This research reviews the early life of Queen Victoria and through analysis of her sequestered childhood and lack of parental figures explains her reliance later in life on mentors and advisors. Additionally, the research reviews previous biographical portrayals of the Queen and refutes the claim that she was merely a receptacle for the ideas of the men around her while still acknowledging and explaining her dependence on these advisors. Keywords Queen Victoria, England, British History, Monarchy, Early Life, Women's History This article is available in The Gettysburg Historical Journal: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/ghj/vol18/iss1/7 Victoria: The Girl Who Would Become Queen By Lindsay Richwine “I am very young and perhaps in many, though not in all things, inexperienced, but I am sure that very few have more real good-will and more real desire to do what is fit and right than I have.”1 –Queen Victoria, 1837 Queen Victoria was arguably the most influential person of the 19th century.
    [Show full text]
  • Erin and Alban
    A READY REFERENCE SKETCH OF ERIN AND ALBAN WITH SOME ANNALS OF A BRANCH OF A WEST HIGHLAND FAMILY SARAH A. McCANDLESS CONTENTS. INTRODUCTION. PART I CHAPTER I PRE-HISTORIC PEOPLE OF BRITAIN 1. The Stone Age--Periods 2. The Bronze Age 3. The Iron Age 4. The Turanians 5. The Aryans and Branches 6. The Celto CHAPTER II FIRST HISTORICAL MENTION OF BRITAIN 1. Greeks 2. Phoenicians 3. Romans CHAPTER III COLONIZATION PE}RIODS OF ERIN, TRADITIONS 1. British 2. Irish: 1. Partholon 2. Nemhidh 3. Firbolg 4. Tuatha de Danan 5. Miledh 6. Creuthnigh 7. Physical CharacteriEtics of the Colonists 8. Period of Ollaimh Fodhla n ·'· Cadroc's Tradition 10. Pictish Tradition CHAPTER IV ERIN FROM THE 5TH TO 15TH CENTURY 1. 5th to 8th, Christianity-Results 2. 9th to 12th, Danish Invasions :0. 12th. Tribes and Families 4. 1169-1175, Anglo-Norman Conquest 5. Condition under Anglo-Norman Rule CHAPTER V LEGENDARY HISTORY OF ALBAN 1. Irish sources 2. Nemedians in Alban 3. Firbolg and Tuatha de Danan 4. Milesians in Alban 5. Creuthnigh in Alban 6. Two Landmarks 7. Three pagan kings of Erin in Alban II CONTENTS CHAPTER VI AUTHENTIC HISTORY BEGINS 1. Battle of Ocha, 478 A. D. 2. Dalaradia, 498 A. D. 3. Connection between Erin and Alban CHAPTER VII ROMAN CAMPAIGNS IN BRITAIN (55 B.C.-410 A.D.) 1. Caesar's Campaigns, 54-55 B.C. 2. Agricola's Campaigns, 78-86 A.D. 3. Hadrian's Campaigns, 120 A.D. 4. Severus' Campaigns, 208 A.D. 5. State of Britain During 150 Years after SeveTus 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Visualising Victoria: Gender, Genre and History in the Young Victoria (2009)
    Visualising Victoria: Gender, Genre and History in The Young Victoria (2009) Julia Kinzler (Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany) Abstract This article explores the ambivalent re-imagination of Queen Victoria in Jean-Marc Vallée’s The Young Victoria (2009). Due to the almost obsessive current interest in Victorian sexuality and gender roles that still seem to frame contemporary debates, this article interrogates the ambiguous depiction of gender relations in this most recent portrayal of Victoria, especially as constructed through the visual imagery of actual artworks incorporated into the film. In its self-conscious (mis)representation of Victorian (royal) history, this essay argues, The Young Victoria addresses the problems and implications of discussing the film as a royal biopic within the generic conventions of heritage cinema. Keywords: biopic, film, gender, genre, iconography, neo-Victorianism, Queen Victoria, royalty, Jean-Marc Vallée. ***** In her influential monograph Victoriana, Cora Kaplan describes the huge popularity of neo-Victorian texts and the “fascination with things Victorian” as a “British postwar vogue which shows no signs of exhaustion” (Kaplan 2007: 2). Yet, from this “rich afterlife of Victorianism” cinematic representations of the eponymous monarch are strangely absent (Johnston and Waters 2008: 8). The recovery of Queen Victoria on film in John Madden’s visualisation of the delicate John-Brown-episode in the Queen’s later life in Mrs Brown (1997) coincided with the academic revival of interest in the monarch reflected by Margaret Homans and Adrienne Munich in Remaking Queen Victoria (1997). Academia and the film industry brought the Queen back to “the centre of Victorian cultures around the globe”, where Homans and Munich believe “she always was” (Homans and Munich 1997: 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Copyrighted Material
    33_056819 bindex.qxp 11/3/06 11:01 AM Page 363 Index fighting the Vikings, 52–54 • A • as law-giver, 57–58 Aberfan tragedy, 304–305 literary interests, 56–57 Act of Union (1707), 2, 251 reforms of, 54–55 Adelaide of Saxe-Meiningen, queen of reign of, 50, 51–52 William IV, 268, 361 Alfred, son of King Aethelred, king of Áed, king of Scotland, 159 England, 73, 74 Áed Findliath, ruler in Ireland, 159 Ambrosius Aurelianus (Roman leader), 40 Aedán mac Gabráin, overking of Dalriada, 153 Andrew, Prince, Duke of York (son of Aelfflaed, queen of Edward, king Elizabeth II) of Wessex, 59 birth of, 301 Aelfgifu of Northampton, queen of Cnut, 68 as naval officer, 33 Aethelbald, king of Mercia, 45 response to death of Princess Diana, 313 Aethelbert, king of Wessex, 49 separation from Sarah, Duchess of York, Aethelflaed, daughter of Alfred, king of 309 Wessex, 46 Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, 57, 58, 63 Aethelfrith, Saxon king, 43 Anglo-Saxons Aethelred, king of England, 51, 65–66 appointing an heir, 16 Aethelred, king of Mercia, 45, 46, 55 invasion of Britain, 39–41 Aethelred, king of Wessex, 50 kingdoms of, 37, 42 Aethelstan, king of Wessex, 51, 61–62 kings of, 41–42 Aethelwold, son of Aethelred, king of overview, 12 Wessex, 60 Anna, queen of Scotland, 204 Aethelwulf, king of Wessex, 49 Anne, Princess Royal, daughter of Africa, as part of British empire, 14 Elizabeth II, 301, 309 Agincourt, battle of, 136–138 Anne, queen of England Albert, Prince, son of George V, later lack of heir, 17 George VI, 283, 291 marriage to George of Denmark, 360–361 Albert of
    [Show full text]
  • Revolutionary Betrayal: the Fall of King George III in the Experience Of
    LIBERTY UNIVERSITY REVOLUTIONARY BETRAYAL: THE FALL OF KING GEORGE III IN THE EXPERIENCE OF POLITICIANS, PLANTERS, AND PREACHERS A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE HISTORY DEPARTMENT IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF HISTORY BY BENJAMIN J. BARLOWE LYNCHBURG, VIRGINIA APRIL 2013 Table of Contents Introduction ......................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 1: “Great Britain May Thank Herself:” King George III, Congressional Delegates, and American Independence, 1774-1776 .................................... 11 Chapter 2: Master and Slave, King and Subject: Southern Planters and the Fall of King George III ....................................................................................... 41 Chapter 3: “No Trace of Papal Bondage:” American Patriot Ministers and the Fall of King George III ................................................................................ 62 Conclusion ........................................................................................................ 89 Bibliography ...................................................................................................... 94 1 Introduction When describing the imperial crisis of 1763-1776 between the British government and the American colonists, historians often refer to Great Britain as a united entity unto itself, a single character in the imperial conflict. While this offers rhetorical benefits, it oversimplifies the complex constitutional relationship between the American
    [Show full text]
  • FACT SHEET Frogmore House Frogmore House
    FACT SHEET Frogmore House Frogmore House is a private, unoccupied residence set in the grounds of the Home Park of Windsor Castle. It is frequently used by the royal family for entertaining. It was recently used as the reception venue for the wedding of The Queen’s eldest grandson, Peter Phillips, to Autumn Kelly, in May 2008. How history shaped Frogmore The estate in which Frogmore House now lies first came into royal ownership in the 16th century. The original Frogmore House was built between 1680 and 1684 for tenants Anne Aldworth and her husband Thomas May, almost certainly to the designs of his uncle, Hugh May who was Charles II’s architect at Windsor. From 1709 to 1738 Frogmore House was leased by the Duke of NorthumberlandNorthumberland, son of Charles II by the Duchess of Cleveland. The House then had a succession of occupants, including Edward Walpole, second son of the Prime Minister Sir Robert Walpole. In 1792 George III (r. 1760-1820) bought Frogmore House for his wife Queen CharlotteCharlotte, who used it for herself and her unmarried daughters as a country retreat. Although the house had been continuously occupied and was generally in good condition, a number of alterations were required to make it fit for the use of the royal family, and architect James Wyatt was appointed to the task. By May 1795, Wyatt had extended the second floor and added single- storey pavilions to the north and south of the garden front, linked by an open colonnade and in 1804 he enlarged the wings by adding a tall bow room and a low room beyond, to make a dining room and library at the south end and matching rooms at the north.
    [Show full text]
  • How Enlightened Was George III? the King, the British Museum and the Enlightenment Robert Lacey
    How enlightened was George III? The King, the British Museum and the Enlightenment Robert Lacey 18 October 2004 Robert Lacey set out to debunk what he sees as the ‘myth’ of George III as the greatest of all royal patrons of the British Museum. As is well known, the king assembled one of the great book collections of the eighteenth century. After his death, his son, George IV, attempted to sell it, but, perhaps swayed by the offer of government funding for the rebuilding of the Queen’s House, he was persuaded to present the books to the Museum. There the collection joined the Old Royal Library, which had been given to the Museum by George II as one of the foundation collections. The ‘King’s Library’ is now the appropriate symbolic centrepiece of the British Library building. Sometimes explicitly and more often implicitly, historians have assumed that George III had always intended that the books should go to the British Museum, but, as Lacey showed, there is no real evidence that this was what he ever envisaged. The collection was instead a working library suitable for an enlightened monarch and assembled mainly with the aim of assisting that particular monarch in the task of governing his kingdom. To clinch his argument, Lacey revealed his latest discoveries from the Royal Archives. Like those of all British monarchs, the will of George III has never been released to historians. That remains the case. However, the Royal Archives have disclosed to Lacey what George III’s will says about his book collection.
    [Show full text]
  • The Victorian Age Queen Victoria Came to the Throne in 1837, When She Was Eighteen Years Old and Reigned Until Her Death in 1901
    The Victorian Age Queen Victoria came to the throne in 1837, when she was eighteen years old and reigned until her death in 1901. Victoria is often called the "grand mother of Europe" because she and her husband Albert had nine children who married other European princes and princesses. The present monarch, Queen Elizabeth II. and her husband Philip are both descended from Victoria. After Albert's death, Victoria retired from public life and wore plack clothes for the rest of her life. During her reign, which is called the "Victorian Age", Britain became the most powerful country in the world, with the largest empire that had ever existed, ruling a quarter of the world's inhabitants. This included India, Australia, Canada and parts of Africa. In Britain most people now lived in the cities, which became bigger and overcrowded. Families moat large and they lived in terrible conditions often in only one room. New factories and machines produced food, clothes and work for them. Trains now transported goods to and from the factories. Soon people started travelling on them too. As a result people, goods and news started to move more easily and more quickly round the country. Some people, especially factory owners, became very rich. However, life in the city was very difficult for poor people, who worked long hours for very low pay. It was difficult to earn enough money to live so women and children worked too. In 1842 it became illegal for boys under ten, women and all girls to work underground in the mines.
    [Show full text]
  • THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION the Effects of the Industrial Revolution
    THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION The effects of the Industrial Revolution. The 18th century was characterized by many events: the rise of the Middle classes, the development of commercial activities, both the growth of industries and banks, and total changes in life-style. The bourgeoisie, although still excluded from political power, played an increasingly influential part in the cultural life of the country, influencing tastes and attitudes in a way which is unique to British culture. In particular the period between 1688 and the middle of the 18th century, pervaded with a relative political stability, was marked by the profound changes that led to the transformation of England from an agricultural country into a great manufacturing and commercial power. It was a gradual and complex process caused by a chain of connected factors and events. The wars of the 18th century were followed by the acquisition of a vast colonial empire, whose growth in wealth and population opened new markets to English goods. The English established their rule in India after the Battle of Plassey in 1757, and in Canada British predominance was assured by the Capture of Quebec in 1759. Within a short time the small-scale hand production of home industry began to prove inadequate to further developments. The continuous increase of the English trade, in concentrating huge profits in the hands of an ambitious upper middle class, mostly composed of affluent merchants, led to a vast accumulation of capitals to be profitably used. The flourishing trade and the economic advancement of the nation invested agriculture; the old system of agriculture of subsistence, based on small-scale farming, was to reveal itself incompatible with the exigencies of an expanding market and the growth of population.
    [Show full text]
  • Queen Victoria Queen Victoria Was Born on 24Th May 1819 In
    Things to do at home Topic Vocabulary Year 2 Spring 2 -Make a family tree for your family. life cycle The series of changes in the life Knowledge -Go on virtual tour of Windsor Castle of a living thing. or Buckingham Palace. chrysalis/ An insect in its inactive stage Organiser pupa between larva and adult. Me and You teenager The stage between being a child and an adult. monarch A sovereign head of state especially a king or queen. reign To hold royal office or rule as a monarch. era A long and distinct period in history. Buckingham Buckingham Palace is the Lon- Queen Queen Palace don residence of the monarchy of the United Kingdom and the Victoria Elizabeth II Commonwealth. coronation The ceremony of crowning a Queen Victoria sovereign. Queen Victoria was born on 24th May 1819 in Kensington Palace, London. jubilee A special anniversary of an event, especially one celebrat- Her full name was Alexandrina Victoria. ing twenty-five or fifty years Victoria became Queen in June 1837, when she was just 18 years old. of a reign or activity. Her coronation took place at Westminster Abbey in June 1838. Balmoral Balmoral Castle is a large es- She spoke fluent English and German, and studied other languages. tate house in Royal Deeside, Queen Victoria married Albert of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha in February 1840. Aberdeenshire, Scotland, Victoria and Albert had nine children. owned by Queen Elizabeth II. Albert died in December 1861, when the Queen was 42 years old. Queen Victoria ruled for over 60 years. Queen Victoria died in January 1901, aged 81 at Osbourne House on Science Lifecycles the Isle of Wight.
    [Show full text]
  • George IV: Radical Or Reactionary?
    20TH JANUARY 2020 George IV: Radical or Reactionary? Dr Stella Tillyard Good evening. I am going to talk tonight about George IV. 2020 marks the 200th anniversary of his accession to the British throne, and this anniversary - opportunely in the light of recent events in the institution of the monarchy - gives us the opportunity to think about the role of an individual, as a private and as a public person, in this most gilded of cages. I am going to ask a few questions about George IV, of the sort of questions that historians do still ask if only of selected historical figures - male figures for the most part - monarchs, politicians, generals and so on - that is to say, was George IV a success, as a public figure - was he a good Prince of Wales, Regent, King? Did he do what the institution of the monarchy demanded of him? I am also going to talk about his influence: did he leave anything that was distinguished, useful or beautiful? And then I am going to talk about him as a person, because George was, after a fashion, a private man, trying, within the constraints of the institution he was born to inherit and head, to lead some sort of private life. Finally, I'll ask if on the 200th anniversary of George IV's accession we should reassess the reputation that he has and modify it in any way. George IV's reputation was poor when he acceded to the throne in 1820, and poor when he died in 1830. The day after his funeral the Times newspaper ran a leader declaring with undeferential relish, 'there never was an individual less regretted by his fellow creatures than this deceased King'.
    [Show full text]