DOCSLIB.ORG

Arkansas Supreme Court Received a New Chief Council, Inc

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arkansas Supreme Court Received a New Chief Council, Inc If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. , ,~E==-===:::::::::=~_"-'" .. "".'.-----'--~ .. ~_".'-~ ... -.'."""_ .... ~--..._~._ ~_~.;_ ~'~";'_." ,'---'-----C., .... --::.:::::::= ..... ~.. c:. :'~l'::C""";'C:"C='=,.".j.... :'" .I__ "~ ___ ~_ ---------- J: ' " .., • • • ~ -' National crim~,-t_ic_e_R_e_fe_r_e_n_c_e_s_e_rv_ic_e______ ---------:1·. • ... - .- • ~~-1 '• - nCJrs ::1 • -• I • I ; • .. -. This microfiche was produced from documents received for I -- inclusion in the NCJRS data base. Since NCJRS cannot exercise control over the physical condition of the documents submitted, ., I " .A ., ..,• A T .. ~ J I I the individual frame quality will vary. The resolution chart on , 1 - • • ... this frame may be used to eva!,yate the document quality. \ , ~.-,-;..~ :'-'- - . .::..:.. .... .....l.'-_'__ •. ~..:..~_._~... , •• "".:......:~ .........:.- i, I~' .~ . '. ~ - , ,' .. ! I -, :; 1I11I?·8 1111'2.5 • " 1.0 Ww ~3.2 22. '" nm3.6 "=- 1l1U~ &:.i Q :! Ug ... u L:.:t.::.u '1 111111.1 1/ ( ~ "'" 1.25 111111.4_ 111111.6 ,t I MICROCOPY PESOLUTION TEST CHART NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS-1963-A I ! ,,~ .... _ ·4'•. "\ ..... ,.:. '1 Microfilmingprocedures used to create this fiche comply with . ij; ·•.... 1 the standards set forth in 41CFR 101-11.504. .,I Points of view or opinions stated in this document are I' I those of the author(s) and do not represent the official I ! ' position or policies of the U. S. Department of Justice. " . ~- --,.-....,....,.,,- ... '-.,;.~-~, .,-;--.,..,..,~.1 I -II y- , .. o rN;:'ti~.i>aI I~~Jiut~ otJ~siic~-=jt:f~~ .. ~~~~,.. ~~~ ", •'" . United States Department of Justice .-._-.. _..... I Washington, D. C. 20531 f f 'I • • I, i I:, , · . /' STATE OF iKANSAS CHIEF JUSTICE Richard B. Adkisson JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT EXECUTIVE SECRETARY Bob Lowery JUSTICE BUILDING 371-2295 LITTLE ROCK 7220 I ~ 0 ru, n Honorable Richard B. Adkisson, Chief Justice Honorable Frank White, Governor and ru !J Members of the Seventy-Third General Assembly 1 Enclosed is the Sixteenth Annual Report (calendar year 1980) of the Arkansas Judicial Department., ~ 10 II Thanks is given to the untiring efforts of the various court i officials and the staff who assisted in collecting, analyzing, and [] 0 presenting this data. It is hoped that this report will be of benefi t in demonstrating some of the achievements of the Judicial Branch of our government while helping pinpoint areas of concern and need. The caseloads continue to rise dramatically at both the trial and appellate levels. This means that the citizens of Arkansas face longer waits for the trial and resolution of their disputes. It is this factor of delay that understandably causes the greatest discontent with the Judiciary and brings into sharp focus the time-honored truism that "justice delayed is justice denied". To meet the burgeoning rate of case filings and attendant delay, some obvious but not easy solutions appear: The number of judges in the courts can be significantly increased; the efficiency of the courts can be improved by the use of more modern equipment; U.S. Depart N . mentofJ and better administrative methods can be employed. This docUment h at/onallnstitute of J~:::~: 79 8 41 person or o~ . as been reprOd in this docu gaO/zation oriainatin ~ced exactly as re . Whatever avenue is taken, the people of Arkansa will have to represent th men~ ~re those of g It. Points of view ce/~~d from the JUstice. e offICIal POsition o;he ~~thors and d~ropmlonSstated expend more funds, perhaps as much as $2.50 or $3.0 of every polIcIes of the N . not neceSSarily atlonall . $1,000.00 spent by the State, instead of the t $1.60. Permission t nstltute of granted by 0 reprOduce this co . Arkansas J ".pyn~hted material has been UC~~C~a1 D epartment ~P~l_l~y~'~~~~1 to the National Crim' 1!"I'l1 JUStiCA R _ Further re ~ eference Servic sion of th:rodu~tiOIl outside f e (NCJRS). Bob Lo y cOPYright owner. 0 the NCJRS syste . Executive Secret m requires permis- BL/fw " 1 ________________________________________________________________________~ ______.. ____ .. ____ ..... u~ CAB.......................... ... --_... ~ --- , FOREWORD '1L The Arkansas Court System maintains separate (g) Cases pertammg to elections and election courts of law and equity. Judges of courts of law are proced ures; TABLE OF CONTENTS designated CircuitJ udges and those of courts of equity (h) Cases involving the discipline of attorneys-at­ are designated Chancellors. Circuit Judges are elected law and other cases arising under the power of to the bench by the voters of the respective judicial cir­ iii the Supreme Court to regulate the practice of FORI~~~:~e~i;~' ........................................................................ cuits every four years, and Chancellors are likewise iv law; Judicial Councii' i~~ .................................................................... iv elected to terms of six years. Continuing Judi~ial Ed~~~ti~~' C;~;s~' Li~t' ................................................ (i) Motions for rule on the clerk under Rule 5 of VI Generally speaking, Circuit Judges preside over Arkansas Judicial Department Organization~i 'I~h~~; ........................................ the Rules of the Supreme Court and Court of Arkansas Court System-Route of Appeal ........................................ ix civil and criminal cases and hear appeal~ from courts Appeals; and when the case in which the relief ................................................. X ?f limit~d ju.risdiction. Trial by jury is a matter of right is sought has not previously been docketed in I 111 the CIrCUit Courts. Chancellors hear cases involving the Court of Appeals and a transcript filed, THESupreme SUPREME Court COURT Time S~~~~;' ............................................................ I domestic relations matters, land disputes, reciprocal motions or petitions for writ of certiorari to Supreme Court Boards and c~~~it't~~~ .................................................. .. 4 support actions, and other cases where equitable relief complete the record and for admission to bail; Supreme Court and Court of Appeals St~ff ................................................ 6 is sought. Trial by jury is not available as a matter of Judicial Department Staff ................................................ right in Chancery Courts. Chancellors also serve as (j) Cases in which the current appeal is a second or Supreme Court Statistics ............................................................... 7 8 probate judges, hearing cases involving wills, guard­ subsequent appeal following an appeal which THE COURT OF APPEALS' ............................................................... ianships, adoptions, mental commitments, and other has been decided in the Supreme Court; Court of Appeals Statisti~s' .............................................................. 16 probate matters. 17 (k) Interlocutory appeals permitted by statute or GENERAL JURISDICTION C~'~~;~"""""""""""""""""""""" •••••••••••• Cases appealcd from the Circuit and Chanccry by the Arkansas Rules of Civil Procedure or of Statistical Tables. ..................................................... 25 Courts are taken to the Court of Appeals, with the Criminal Proccdure; Workload Graphs" .................................................................... 25 exception of the following types of cases which are 32 (I) Cases involving substantial questions as to Circuit, Chancery, ~~d' Pr~'ba't~ 'j~ci~~~ .................................................... appealed directly to the Supreme Court: Assignment of Judges .................................................... 37 usury; (a) Ail cases involving the interpretation or con­ Comparative Tables ................................................................... 39 (m) Products liability cases (Per Curiam 1/28{80); 39 struction of the Constitution of Arkansas; Trial Court Administ~~;i~·n· .............................................................. o 42 (n) Cases involving oil, gas or mineral rights Prosecuting Attorneys .............................................................. (b) Criminal cases in which the death penalty, life 43 Public Defenders .................................................................. imprisonment, or a cumulative sentence of 47 Appeal cases decided by the Court of Appeals may Statistical Tabi~ .................................................................... more than 30 years imprisonment has been not be appealed to the Supreme Court as a matter of Court Reporters .................................................................... 48 imposed; right, but the Supreme Court may grant certiorari for Clerks of the Co~~;s' .................................................................... 49 review or such decisions. Circuit Court Statisti~~ .................................................................. 50 (c) Cases, other than appeals from the Worker's Chancery Court Statisti'c~' ............................................................... 53 Compensation Commission or from the Board The Arkansas public is also served by courts of Probate Court Statistics ............................................................... 70 of Review created by the Employment Security limited jurisdiction, which are described later in this 84 Law, in which the validity, interpretation, con­ LIMITED JURISDICTION .~~.~~.;~ ........................................................ rcport. Perhaps the most important of these courts are struction or constitutionality
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Many-Storied Place
    A Many-storied Place Historic Resource Study Arkansas Post National Memorial, Arkansas Theodore Catton Principal Investigator Midwest Region National Park Service Omaha, Nebraska 2017 A Many-Storied Place Historic Resource Study Arkansas Post National Memorial, Arkansas Theodore Catton Principal Investigator 2017 Recommended: {){ Superintendent, Arkansas Post AihV'j Concurred: Associate Regional Director, Cultural Resources, Midwest Region Date Approved: Date Remove not the ancient landmark which thy fathers have set. Proverbs 22:28 Words spoken by Regional Director Elbert Cox Arkansas Post National Memorial dedication June 23, 1964 Table of Contents List of Figures vii Introduction 1 1 – Geography and the River 4 2 – The Site in Antiquity and Quapaw Ethnogenesis 38 3 – A French and Spanish Outpost in Colonial America 72 4 – Osotouy and the Changing Native World 115 5 – Arkansas Post from the Louisiana Purchase to the Trail of Tears 141 6 – The River Port from Arkansas Statehood to the Civil War 179 7 – The Village and Environs from Reconstruction to Recent Times 209 Conclusion 237 Appendices 241 1 – Cultural Resource Base Map: Eight exhibits from the Memorial Unit CLR (a) Pre-1673 / Pre-Contact Period Contributing Features (b) 1673-1803 / Colonial and Revolutionary Period Contributing Features (c) 1804-1855 / Settlement and Early Statehood Period Contributing Features (d) 1856-1865 / Civil War Period Contributing Features (e) 1866-1928 / Late 19th and Early 20th Century Period Contributing Features (f) 1929-1963 / Early 20th Century Period
    [Show full text]
  • Amendments to the Constitution of Arkansas of 1874
    AMENDMENTS TO THE CONSTITUTION OF ARKANSAS OF 1874 Constitution Of The State Of Arkansas Of 1874 AMENDMENTS TO THE CONSTITUTION OF ARKANSAS OF 1874 AMEND. 1. “HOLFORD” BONDS (CONST., ART. 20 ADDED). AMEND. 2. REGULATION OF CARRIERS (CONST., ART. 17, § 10 AMENDED). AMEND. 3. COUNTY ROAD TAX [REPEALED.] AMEND. 4. SURETIES ON OFFICIAL BONDS (CONST., ART. 19, § 21 AMENDED). AMEND. 5. PER DIEM AND MILEAGE OF GENERAL ASSEMBLY (CONST., ART. 5, § 16 AMENDED). AMEND. 6. EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT AND OFFICERS (CONST., ART. 6, § 1, AMENDED AND SECTIONS ADDED). AMEND. 7. INITIATIVE AND REFERENDUM (CONST., ART. 5, § 1, AMENDED). AMEND. 8. QUALIFICATIONS OF ELECTORS (CONST., ART. 3, § 1, AMENDED). AMEND. 9. SUPREME COURT. AMEND. 10. LIMITATION ON LEGISLATIVE AND TAXING POWER (CONST., ART. 12, § 4, AMENDED). AMEND. 11. SCHOOL TAX (CONST., ART. 14, § 3, AMENDED). AMEND. 12. TEXTILE MILLS, TAX EXEMPTION. AMEND. 13. [REPEALED.] AMEND. 14. LOCAL ACTS. AMEND. 15. SALARIES OF STATE OFFICERS. AMEND. 16. JURY TRIAL (CONST., ART. 2, § 7, AMENDED). AMENDMENTS TO THE CONSTITUTION OF ARKANSAS OF 1874 AMEND. 17. [REPEALED.] AMEND. 18. TAX TO AID INDUSTRIES. AMEND. 19. PASSAGE OF LAWS (CONST., ART. 5, §§ [37]-[41] ADDED). AMEND. 20. STATE BONDS. AMEND. 21. CRIMINAL PROSECUTIONS - SALARIES OF PROSECUTORS. AMEND. 22. EXEMPTION OF HOMESTEADS FROM CERTAIN STATE TAXES. AMEND. 23. APPORTIONMENT (CONST., ART. 8 AMENDED). AMEND. 24. PROBATE COURTS - CIRCUIT AND COUNTY CLERKS (CONST., ART. 7, §§ 19, 34, 35, AMENDED). AMEND. 25. [REPEALED.] AMEND. 26. WORKERS' COMPENSATION (CONST., ART. 5, § 32, AMENDED). AMEND. 27. EXEMPTING NEW MANUFACTURING ESTABLISHMENT FROM TAXATION. AMEND. 28. REGULATING PRACTICE OF LAW. AMEND. 29. FILLING VACANCIES IN OFFICE.
    [Show full text]
  • House Bill Returned to the Senate As Requested
    --ooOoo-- FIFTH DAY’S PROCEEDINGS SENATE CHAMBER EIGHTY-FIFTH GENERAL ASSEMBLY 1ST EXTRAORDINARY SESSION _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Little Rock, Arkansas April 7, 2006 The Senate was called to order at 11:00 o'clock a.m. by the President. The Secretary called the roll, and the following members answered to roll call: ALTES, ARGUE, BAKER, BISBEE, BROADWAY, BROWN, BRYLES, CAPPS, CRITCHER, FARIS, GLOVER, HENDREN, HIGGINBOTHOM, HILL, HOLT, HORN, G.JEFFRESS, J.JEFFRESS, JOHNSON, LAVERTY, LUKER, MADISON, MALONE, MILLER, SALMON, SMITH, STEELE, TAYLOR, TRUSTY, WHITAKER, WILKINS, WILKINSON, WOMACK, WOOLDRIDGE. The Senate was led in prayer by Senator Jimmy Jeffress. The Senate was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by the President. On motion of Senator Hill, the reading of the Journal was dispensed with. ARKANSAS SENATE EIGHTY-FIFTH GENERAL ASSEMBLY 1ST EXTRAORDINARY SESSION April 7, 2006 Mr. President: We, your Committee on EDUCATION, to whom was referred: HOUSE BILL NO. 1016, BY REPRESENTATIVE ABERNATHY, HOUSE BILL NO. 1030, BY REPRESENTATIVE WALTERS beg leave to report that we have had the same under consideration, and herewith return the same with the recommendation that they do pass. Respectfully submitted, (SIGNED) SENATOR JIM ARGUE, CHAIRMAN Senate Bill No. 12 was returned from the House as passed, emergency clause having failed of adoption, and ordered enrolled. Senate Bill No. 27 was returned from the House as passed, as amended. On motion of Senator Broadway, Senate Bill No. 27 was ordered re-referred to the Committee on EDUCATION. 234 SENATE MEMORIAL RESOLUTION NO. 4 EIGHTY-FIFTH GENERAL ASSEMBLY 1ST EXTRAORDINARY SESSION BY: SENATOR BAKER SENATE MEMORIAL RESOLUTION IN RESPECTFUL MEMORY OF DR.
    [Show full text]
  • CV-20-454 in the Arkansas Supreme Court an Original Action Arkansas
    ELECTRONICALLY FILED Arkansas Supreme Court Stacey Pectol, Clerk of the Courts 2020-Aug-14 17:56:26 CV-20-454 42 Pages CV-20-454 In the Arkansas Supreme Court An Original Action Arkansas Voters First, a ballot question committee; Bonnie Miller, individually and on behalf of Arkansas Voters First; and Open Primaries Arkansas, a ballot question committee Petitioners v CV-20-454 John Thurston, in his official capacity as Secretary of State; the State Board of Election Commissioners Respondents Arkansans for Transparency, a ballot question committee; and Jonelle Fulmer, individually and on behalf of Arkansans for Transparency Intervenors Petitioners’ Brief on Counts 1 & 2 Ryan Owsley (2007-151) Adam H. Butler (2003-007) Nate Steel (2007-186) Robert F. Thompson (97-232) Alex Gray (2008-127) 414 West Court Street Alec Gaines (2012-277) Paragould, AR 72450 Steel, Wright, Gray, PLLC 870.239.9581 400 W. Capitol Ave., Suite 2910 [email protected] Little Rock, AR 72201 [email protected] 501.251.1587 [email protected] Table of Contents Table of Contents ................................................................................... 2 Informational Statement ........................................................................ 4 Jurisdictional Statement ......................................................................... 6 Issues and Principal Authorities ............................................................ 7 Table of Authorities ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Arkansas Constitution
    CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF ARKANSAS OF 1874 Updated as of October 5, 2015 Table of Contents Preamble ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 Articles ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 1. Boundaries --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 2. Declaration of Rights -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 Section: 1. Source of power --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 2. Freedom and independence -------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 3. Equality before the law ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 4. Right of assembly and of petition ------------------------------------------------------------ 2 5. Right to bear arms ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2 6. Liberty of the press and of speech – Libel -------------------------------------------------- 2 7. Jury trial – Right to – Waiver – Civil cases – Nine jurors agreeing --------------------- 2 8. Criminal charges – Self-incrimination – Due process – Double jeopardy – Bail ------ 2 9. Excessive bail or punishment prohibited – Witnesses – Detention ---------------------- 3 10. Right of accused enumerated – Change of venue ----------------------------------------- 3 11. Habeas corpus ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • United States Court of Appeals for the EIGHTH CIRCUIT ______
    United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 11-1858 ___________ Curtis Ray Frisby, Special * Administrator of the Estate of * Shirley Fay Frisby, * * Plaintiff - Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * Western District of Arkansas. * Milbank Manufacturing Co., * * Defendant - Appellee. * ___________ Submitted: February 16, 2012 Filed: July 31, 2012 ___________ Before LOKEN, BYE, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges. ___________ LOKEN, Circuit Judge. Shirley Frisby collapsed and died from an apparent heart attack while working on an assembly line at Milbank Manufacturing Company’s facility in El Dorado, Arkansas. A claim for workers’ compensation death benefits was filed just before the two-year statute of limitations expired. See Ark. Code § 11-9-702(a)(1). After a contested hearing, the Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Commission denied the claim, concluding that the claimant failed to establish by a preponderance of the evidence both “that Mrs. Frisby sustained a compensable myocardial infarction injury” and “that an accident is the major cause of the physical harm that Mrs. Frisby Appellate Case: 11-1858 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/31/2012 Entry ID: 3937185 sustained.” See Ark. Code §§ 11-9-102(4)(A)(i), (iv); 11-9-114(b)(1). Curtis Frisby as administrator of his wife’s estate then commenced this wrongful death diversity action against Milbank. The district court1 dismissed the action as time barred. Frisby appeals, arguing that the filing of a workers’ compensation claim tolls the statute of limitations for a tort claim against the employer for the same injury, and alternatively that the Arkansas “savings statute” applies and provided him one year after the workers’ compensation claim denial to file this action for the same injury.
    [Show full text]
  • June 30, 2011
    Arkansas Lottery Commission An Enterprise Fund of the State of Arkansas Alicia Rose Jonesboro Chukwukere Ekeh Ratasha Whaley Shayla Morrow North Little Rock Blytheville Hartman Bradley Huggins Jessica Corbitt Benton Lexa Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the Fiscal Year Ended JUNE 30, 2011 Kent Broughton Brandon Booth Pine Bluff Little Rock Receiving this scholarship has helped me tremendously with my finances and has given me THE OPPORTUNITY TO SUCCEED in reaching my future goals. While furthering my education has been costly, being a recipient has helped me with my undergraduate experiences and my overall life.” Britni Means | Junior Philander Smith College Malvern Arkansas Lottery Commission An Enterprise Fund of the State of Arkansas Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2011 Mike Beebe Governor, State of Arkansas Julie Baldridge Interim Director Prepared by Finance Division I am currently a freshman at Arkansas State University majoring in the Radiologic Sciences program. Upon receiving the Arkansas Lottery Scholarship, I have been able to pursue my EDUCATIONAL DREAMS without the burden of financial instability. I am blessed to have received this scholarship for it has allowed me to focus more on my studies while reducing my parents’ fear of not being able to financially support my decision to attend college.” Kourtney Hatcher | Freshman Arkansas State University Jonesboro Arkansas Lottery Commission An Enterprise Fund of the State of Arkansas Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For the
    [Show full text]
  • La Dolce Vita: Law and Equity Merged at Last!
    The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law CUA Law Scholarship Repository Scholarly Articles and Other Contributions Faculty Scholarship 1970 La Dolce Vita: Law and Equity Merged at Last! George P. Smith II The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law Walter W. Nixon III Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.edu/scholar Part of the Legal History Commons Recommended Citation George P. Smith II and Walter W. Nixon III, La Dolce Vita: Law and Equity Merged at Last!, 24 ARK. L. REV. 162 (1970). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at CUA Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Scholarly Articles and Other Contributions by an authorized administrator of CUA Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. La Dolce Vita-Law and Equity Merged at Last! The forms of actions we have buried, but they still rule us from their graves. F.W. Maitland, 1909. Article 5, section 6 (a) of the proposed Constitution of Ar- kansas of 1970 states simply, "District Courts are established as trial divisions of the Trial Department. They shall have original jurisdiction of all justiciable matters not otherwise provided in this constitution, and such powers of review of administrative action as may be provided by law." The schedule of the new document contains temporary provisions going to the scope of jurisdiction of the present courts by declaring: The jurisdiction hereby conferred on District Courts shall in- clude all matters previously cognizable by Circuit, Chancery, and Probate Courts and all judicial matters previously cog- nizable by County and Common Pleas Courts.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2018
    Administrative Office of the Courts 1 Annual Report 2018 Annual Report OF THE ARKANSAS JUDICIARY 2018 Administrative Office of the Courts 2 Annual Report 2018 In This Report Chief Justice’s Message 1 Letter from the Director 2 Court Structure 3 About the Data 4 Arkansas Supreme Court 5 Court of Appeals 8 Appeals on Wheels 11 Boards and Committees 12 Funding the Judiciary 15 Administrative Office of the Courts 16 Judicial Council 22 Courts of General Jurisdiction 23 Arkansas Judicial Circuits 25 Limited Jurisdiction Courts 90 State District Judges 95 Local District Judges 98 Specialty Courts 100 In Memorium 103 Administrative Office of the Courts 1 Annual Report 2018 From The Chief Justice My fellow Arkansans, Keeping in mind our Vision Statement that the Arkansas Judiciary will embody integrity, transparency, and accountability to the public, which it serves, I am excited and pleased to introduce the 2018 Annual Report. The Annual Report is designed to bring even more transparency to the People of Arkansas and highlights the essential efforts of all the state’s courts in administering justice this past year. As in years past, statistics, data, and other information that demonstrate the courts’ extraordinary dedication can be found in these pages. For the first time, Arkansas has a long-term, strategic plan for the judiciary. The Strategic Planning Committee worked tirelessly to establish a vision for what Arkansas courts may – indeed must – become over the next few years. In some ways, the material presented in this year’s annual report can be used in future editions to evaluate our courts’ progress toward the six goals presented in the Strategic Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Answer to 3 Combined Complaints-Asa Hutchinson
    ELECTRONICALLY FILED Pulaski County Circuit Court Terri Hollingsworth, Circuit/County Clerk 2021-Aug-27 11:29:10 60CV-21-4692 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS C06D06 : 22 Pages CIVIL DIVISION VERONICA McCLANE, as parent and next friend of her minor children, Walter and Beckett McClane; and ASHLEY SIMMONS, as parent and next friend of her minor children, August and Henry Simmons PLAINTIFFS vs. Case No. 60CV-21-4692 THE STATE OF ARKANSAS, acting through the 93rd General Assembly; JIMMY HICKEY, JR., in his official capacity as President Pro Tempore of the Arkansas Senate; MATTHEW SHEPHERD; in his official capacity as Speaker of the Arkansas House of Representatives; and ASA HUTCHINSON; in his official capacity as the Governor of Arkansas DEFENDANTS BARRY HYDE, in his official capacity as the County Judge for Pulaski County; and ERIC HIGGINS, in his official capacity as Pulaski County Sheriff INTERVENORS / THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFFS and LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT and MARION SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFFS vs. Case No. 60CV-21-4763 HON. ASA HUTCHINSON, in his Official Capacity as Governor of the State of Arkansas, and STATE OF ARKANSAS DEFENDANTS COMBINED ANSWER OF HON. ASA HUTCHINSON in his Official Capacity as Governor of the State of Arkansas Comes now the Defendant and Third-Party Defendant, Hon. Asa Hutchinson in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Arkansas, and for his Answer to the 1 of 22 Complaint Seeking a Temporary Restraining Order filed August 2, 2021 by Plaintiffs McClane et al; his Answer to the Complaint filed August 5, 2021 filed by the Little Rock School District et al; and his Answer to the Third-Party Complaint filed August 5, 2021 by Barry Hyde and Eric Higgins in their respective, official capacities, alleges and states: A.
    [Show full text]
  • Arkansas Juvenile Courts: Do Lay Judges Satisfy Due Process in Delinquency Cases
    University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review Volume 6 Issue 4 Article 2 1983 Arkansas Juvenile Courts: Do Lay Judges Satisfy Due Process in Delinquency Cases Paula J. Casey Follow this and additional works at: https://lawrepository.ualr.edu/lawreview Part of the Fourteenth Amendment Commons, and the Juvenile Law Commons Recommended Citation Paula J. Casey, Arkansas Juvenile Courts: Do Lay Judges Satisfy Due Process in Delinquency Cases, 6 U. ARK. LITTLE ROCK L. REV. 501 (1983). Available at: https://lawrepository.ualr.edu/lawreview/vol6/iss4/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Bowen Law Repository: Scholarship & Archives. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review by an authorized editor of Bowen Law Repository: Scholarship & Archives. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ARKANSAS JUVENILE COURTS: DO LAY JUDGES SATISFY DUE PROCESS IN DELINQUENCY CASES? Paula J. Casey* INTRODUCTION A separate criminal jurisprudence for children was unheard of until the twentieth century. Prior to the creation of juvenile courts at the beginning of this century, children who were charged with crimes were subjected to adult criminal proceedings. The belief that the causes of delinquency could be predicted and treated so as to prevent deviant behavior in children fostered reforms in the applica- tion of criminal law to juveniles.' These reforms eventually resulted in the creation of juvenile courts.' The first juvenile courts resem- bled social agencies and were designed to protect and rehabilitate rather than punish juveniles who were charged with crimes. Juve- nile proceedings, which were not structured as adversarial proceed- ings, were often summary and informal with juveniles forfeiting due process safeguards.' There was little need for a juvenile court judge to be trained in the law.
    [Show full text]
  • Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Arkansas
    ***THIS IS A CAPITAL CASE*** No. _____________ 3Jn tbe $,ilpreme QCourt of tbe Wniteb $)tates STACEY JOHNSON, JASON McGEHEE, BRUCE WARD, TERRICK NOONER, JACK JONES, MARCEL WILLIAMS, KENNETH WILLIAMS, DON DAVIS, and LEDELL LEE Petitioners V. WENDY KELLEY, in her official capacity as Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, and ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION Respondents On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Arkansas PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI MEREDITH L. BOYLAN Counsel ofRecord GEORGE KOSTOLAMPROS VENABLELLP 575 7th Street, NW Washington, DC (202) 344-4000 [email protected] [email protected] Counsel for Petitioners (Additional counsel follows) JENNIFFER HORAN JEFF ROSENZWEIG Federal Public Defender 300 Spring Street, Ste. 310 Eastern District of Arkansas Little Rock, AR 72201 (501) 372-524 7 JOHN C. WILLIAMS [email protected] Ass't Federal Public Defender 1401 W. Capitol, Ste. 490 Counsel for Petitioners Little Rock, AR 72201 Johnson, Jones, Lee, and (501) 324-6114 Kenneth Williams [email protected] Counsel for Petitioners McGehee, Nooner, Ward, and Marcel Williams JENNIFER MERRIGAN DEBORAH R. SALLINGS JOSEPH FERKOVICH 35715 Sample Road PHILLIPS BLACK Roland, AR 72135 P.O. Box 2171 [email protected] New York, NY 10008 (212) 400-1660 Counsel for Petitioner Davis [email protected] [email protected] Counsel for Petitioner Ward QUESTIONS PRESENTED ***CAPITAL CASE*** The Eighth Amendment requires a prisoner challenging a method of execution to (1) establish that the method will likely cause extreme pain and (2) "plead and prove a known and available alternative." Glossip v. Gross, 135 S. Ct. 2726, 2739 (2015).
    [Show full text]