DOCSLIB.ORG

Morris and Lona Cohen Part 1 of 4

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Morris and Lona Cohen Part 1 of 4 FREEDOM OF INFORMATION AND PRIVACY ACTS SUBJECT: MORRISAND LONACOHEN FILE NUMBER: 100-406659 PART: 1 OF 1 _ 2,/,/.._..»¢=. -::::::::> _5=,-4-<<;,;,=¬,,,, .. A H-, : 1 I , » . v ;._ 11.53"» " _- -&#39; -._;;:;:;;mg§;}»7/_/ $1 --;_;5;;.._ ~ FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION /mm //_ 1 I 1- I!- 2,.1i Z..W. ......._....._.._____ §Ec_£im5 I! /4, 7.2 /714/J42.. r~ - -K"F§- *:=.:;;-*w-.-=.-_-_ -. K, ---.--~--~=B.; - -gx. --&#39;- .i -.-"~ f92I-.-M, . A _;__,--.k;;. ." K =- . - - " ;---I &#39;&#39; .._ ... - &#39;i;&#39; . I -&#39;-&#39;: &#39;-. _.,- I~ -~ 5&#39;"";4: &#39;*#_-&#39;,_.~- -.-.j =-"-=~=_;"-Ef, ,,&#39;35?.-*1" ._--... -. ;-, ---~*.-=1 - ._-j&#39;--A" "7 I . .;.- . 4 - -- . " -. »_*@|j FILE DESCRIPTION SUBJECT /$9/Zlfff Q_o f§92/_ FILE ~uve£n_ - Z ff 9&6??? W SECT ION NJVEER { I 3 I I $1. , I s:-acuazwy INFORMATION-CON &#39;IDE TILL FE5E§I[ QUFQEKU 6F IN rm-mace: 1., Tm: CAI! ouucrlu-I-I: an REL] YQRK S E L&#39;.l J &#39;fln 7* V1 :LU" DAI;IN&#39;III l0/11+ IlOI92;I&#39;1&#39;lCl»lMA1 15 20,21i IXfQZ H b"/ . ¥°P+< * 1 _ new gee ,_# 92 Q-I_ _,_é.,. _&#39;-- &#39;,4, .. ~-"Q -= ._ _ p$:ID¥ .- - . -_-___.-_.!_%;&#39;§:_"1_ 92¢&#39; "92 92.-&#39; . &#39; _&#39;I_ It " &#39; - --92&#39; . _-7-.- - IJQQIS P I. I§@II &#39;ix 1* rfYI|crnl¢Il&#39;I&#39; Residence and elpley-nent&#39;unknmrn. Iizfozihnt 6f__"*7-7&#39;5 liability, nausea subject and use have hm ci meeting: e in their onesaad are very radical Colin. nbjeet foight ,_-,4: ._._. - &#39; o_1m.ism-[tn-a.tT.n Lincoln Brigade. Subject expressed his feelings ter- &#39; - &#39;1 - &#39; &#39; K " =-&#39; _ - - -&#39;- 4 ._k;_ - I - _ P _ Cjfw . ;3_-1_-1!.-v;-_~¢&#39;:ur""._f92_ ""IE&#39;1A7&#39;.:3- I5. .1 &#39; r:" &#39;3-7» DETAILS: v§1a_,p 1 -.,.;. 4 edicated. on information eived on b &#39; _os on to know e subject, unlcnown advised thet reliability, the swbject is but who isa vay Din radical Co:n.mu:.iet ani that he has had Comlmmist Party meeting; i.l_~ his hone. - v - &#39;"&#39; A " &#39; ~""* " /-eet we. &#39; ~ BICKIS ROUND -P D1 ...;.: I 4. Residence 11:-04 __ lubice &#39; I . Y ll 1950, bnt"that she rlid not lmov his present add-rue. iadvised the subject&#39;s parents HARE! and SLRAE QOHH corms nmsmomn _ I" -_ . - -,-. ii 7 ff " W -5-5--G -m-a.- <~ ii 09L405659]"}/ Bureau RH! NOV 13 H53 3L," New -NOV York, 20 J&:"-i.0338<;!"~ 25 " _b-- In n ~11-es» In | rInul mum. eonrmunn union -., I no m courum Ge main _ to 1 IJ iv e: w rm no - us~69 not To I um-munn _on-rm: or FIT? I?FPBJ""Z92_A -1" ;__5&#39;*N -:1"r92¥. f -&#39; n T T NY 100-103389 LFFILLALL0! 211&#39;:mm csmwyrer am: &#39; Bvidence_o{_CommunistHembershig Party Mx/ IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII_ a, l ,. 7 and his wife,- ,te* ve o s Party neetinga in >1? their home in the past and that both have been very radical_ Comunists since the Informant has known them. Evidence of Commuist Party Sygpathl _ _ -also advised that the subject wentto Spainand §v/ fought with the Communists in the Civil Var Abraham Lincoln Brigade!. The AbrahamLincoln Brigade has beencited by the Attorney General of the United States pursuant to Executive . Q1118! " 1 The Informant stated that the subject vorked for the Russians during the New York World&#39;s Fair during 1°39 and l9hO. P of Unknown re1iebility,"butwho in;is .5-mia to know t e subject, advised the subject expressed his feelings. for Communism and that he also fought in Spain for the working class against fascism. MISCELLANEOUS The records of the Bureau of Special Services and Investizetinniilew York City Police Denartment. as checked bv bqff s October&#39; &#39; 11+,1953 failed to indicate any-&#39;; info on den ieble with the Iubject. " " &#39; ¢ reliability, whoalle1&#39;1mown are iaiiiier with soie 511/phases ef Cemiunist ? Party activity in the Iew York City area, advise they do_aet know the subject. _ ... I NY 100-103389 - D}§CRIPTIQ descriptionreceived was fron- Name Age Sex Race HeightI 1: Sn__ ,,__ mu!r Height @;1:;§@BR;s<§§@;N - lpproxinately }1/,. e Hair 11-1e &#39; »f/ White519i! Marital 155 lbs. Wife Br turning grey Status _ " 19 Parents ;. I j_A3R%01-EH,. F , _"_&#39; 2020 Walton Avenue, Bronx, New York - p - SE 1 HY 100-10 3339 mncrnjgsrzmrvs RLGB l_1I.F£5BlT. Identity of Date of Activity Date Agent to File H0. Source and/or Description Received Ihol Where "" , I .°LIn.t°rnet1sen _ _I1rn1sh~¢__lsmLu_ lcCommunist tivities Part Y 100-103389-1 iv&#39;70 W Y</ W hpressed feeling" S1 for Communism 100-103389-1B1 bx/&#39;b1-D 929&#39;Vp16! C "092 Negative ha Hegative Instant y»/ Report MPNegative Instant bar <I925 Fegative Report av Iegative Instant Report U¢Hegative Instant Report» Instant Report 92. I Instant - M _ Report 4.4 1 - &#39;092. .~ . _ i -Y. -..:_...._ ~__ - &#39;;r,:"&#39;%_":&#39;92,--3&#39;-III :1". "Q - _» __ -1. 1. _V_V Q __,_ "A »_ A "_.,.=r..¢=l-5*; . 1 l.u _ 1 -. .*..;* V _ . _, ___&#39; A. &#39;9&#39;. I ..92 ,_ ;__ _;_ ____ ., .U, , __ . -.. 92 _ __.__,_".* NY 100-103339 LEAD _ at -11 " I.&#39;E.&#39;I YORK ,1; r .. -,*= . &#39; p - P ..&#39;?. 5 ,. .1 . &#39;-1 -..- :~-"&#39; -"&#39;"&#39; . ~..». _ -,5? w . Pi»; &#39;7 - &#39; .. - _ A &#39;, - 4 . _ . . &#39;* ";»r&#39;rS@<_- jn£q*~£¥ ADM1N1§TRAT1yE Eggs jCONT!D1- _ - - &#39; &#39; _ _. V _- - . _ ~- - . -- " 1 4 F .|-k_ ~ a , At Ne92&#39;rfIor_kAj Ngw York; _ - _ A ,- _ I 1 ti ation attempt to . t~ 1¢;ne . ». S %¢§.:*;¥:%*;.£:;:::..2::;:.,%[email protected] . %;c§ground information. .&#39; r *.- 92~ &#39; ¢ 92 q 1 . &#39; . I ll 92 "921W*92 - .. 92 . *0. .-, .&#39; A ~ - - ."92&#39;"" ..|1. -- - ,--n. .-. - 1 92 .r 92&#39; _ v J * &#39; .-2 . *¢ *1 . .. &#39; .." --4 .- , ¢ &#39; ~ x &#39; 92 - .. *7 -92 - . o 5; l -=.__*- - &#39;a*."&#39; , /3 1 192&#39;-. .5 --. __ 4.3 __. _+-me_. - i yllii."-" .:-Q-~13! i p p . -_,-. -" ~ -- --|&#39;:-&#39; 9,. i. .1 .4_;1,}. tr: l &#39; ,: I " - 3 _ r 3 L ._ ,, . &#39;,B_.-_":1, . ,._,. 5 fa A .*F 3 5", ,1 1 W Q now§¥reliabi1ity, butHuhohas provided92yEXv+; 4-»of, er unk tags- 1 relic W3 the subject,in thepast, . 1 advised that the si1bje&#39;ct&#39;swhereabouts ,s are at the present time and that . I-92._ to the best of the in.f_o_rmant&#39;sknowledgelthe last address 1 i 92- at which the subject could be reached was 178 East Tlst 4 .><*= Street, New York City. I . ._,___.f __;_ _ 1&#39; if For unknownreliability, whobut in isa positionb1/ &#39; to prov e accurate information concerning the subject&#39;s 1 .&#39;.t.92._~ residence and employment, advised on February ll, 195k, that the subject&#39;s whereabouts at the present time are unknown to the informant and stated further that to the best of the ,- -L informant&#39;s belief, the subject is presently residing and working somewhere in California, and has been there for approximately the past one and one-half years. &#39; A e I W t a adv sed 92T&#39;/ ~ _+. -. W theE0 knownsubjectreliI s last bility,known 1 residencewas East7 mp =~ &#39;_. s Street, New York City, and that the subject&#39;s where- abouts at the present time are uni-;nown. V _ A, V _ I that the ofsubject&#39;s knownreliability, last known address advise was 7 East st Street, New York City, and that the subject&#39;s present whereabouts are not known to the informant. &#39; &#39; K _ Ba" .. ¢_". "ii" Mr .1 &#39;.,L&#39;:;-: 1 1 __ . ,_ . 1. ; 1. .1-_._ . 8 &#39; _ . -. _P&#39;|&#39;J .- .15- -1- =}_- . &#39; -:1-1* J " --J - 4» .1 :--I r "fit I /I. ":1-r .l.¥_!;~ ~13:._-F», _._. 1 " ., ,_,_ - &#39;. &#39; .. _< ._ _ 92_.._ .. H . C1 5 .-;&#39; ..-&#39; Pr", -=", &#39; -&#39; Q-1-.1, ,." |;.:&#39;_. 5- .> i&#39;- -a :7 ~z=.- __&#39;»- on wK~ &#39;1 &#39;I~"92_ &#39; - &#39; 1 77 7 927"- A- V 7 !92- L"? - 0 5" =,P -15$w 5 :4.-,-= ~- 92.- -_ A v - _¢-,_- -; t" .5&#39;i&#39;;=1 ____ _. t _..- e} __ 4. __- -_ .f &#39;-~ 31*-3,1; INFOFMANTS *- ,92 A , _ ,3 -2 J&#39;92~_ .11-==--&#39; ___;:;-=.=;-._ 13.. 1 <;f&#39;_ t"-".1 at: 1*. _.r;. $_;<*_>;;~§j .c~&#39;-.;$ ._ e-5" . -. I _t" Ea;-,;1tia,";>r&#39; &#39;_~-&#39;.7"15aza""6f"j;é&#39;t1§iEi 4&#39; .&#39; rinks A * F- Igentk to rue -&#39;---> &#39;?"Y {9°&#39;1°3339 "?§33tZ£;*$H H --&#39;»1»gg;:§%£1&#39;.;17;;§ae~._.£, 1"&#39;4; 92 . _#;_._;. U; ..-.1 5 : I _-.»*_ .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Espionage Against the United States by American Citizens 1947-2001
    Technical Report 02-5 July 2002 Espionage Against the United States by American Citizens 1947-2001 Katherine L. Herbig Martin F. Wiskoff TRW Systems Released by James A. Riedel Director Defense Personnel Security Research Center 99 Pacific Street, Building 455-E Monterey, CA 93940-2497 REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports (0704- 0188), 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS. 1. REPORT DATE (DDMMYYYY) 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED (From – To) July 2002 Technical 1947 - 2001 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER Espionage Against the United States by American Citizens 1947-2001 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER Katherine L. Herbig, Ph.D. Martin F. Wiskoff, Ph.D. 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Waterlooville U3a Modern History Group 1 Project 2020
    WATERLOOVILLE U3A MODERN HISTORY GROUP 1 PROJECT 2020 Waterlooville U3A Modern History Group 1 Research Projects 2020 Introduction Prior to the restrictions brought about by Covid 19, our Modern History Group met fortnightly on a Thursday morning at the home of one of our members. Each session, members would take it in turn to bring a subject of historical interest to the table that they had researched. This would be presented to the group, followed by much lively discussion led by Ted Packer our Group Co-Ordinator Since March of course we have not been able to meet ‘round the table’ but from the beginning of August we resumed our sessions using Zoom. After some initial reservations and getting to grips with the technology, most of the group have come back together and our sessions have continued much as before. The aim of the group has always been, in keeping with the U3A ethos, to learn through our own research and endeavours and to enjoy sharing that knowledge with others in a friendly and enjoyable manner. When, through necessity, the Open Day was cancelled in October, the Group came up with the idea of sharing our collectively gained knowledge more widely by posting a precis of each of our research topics from 2020 on the WU3A website. As you will see, the subjects are varied and wide ranging and invoked much debate and discussion. We hope you enjoy reading what follows and that it may inspire you to find out more! Anna Leonowens (1831 – 1915) Anna Leonowens was born in 1831 to a military family in British India and later became a tutor to the King of Siam's children.
    [Show full text]
  • An Interview with Morris L. Cohen*
    LAW LIBRARY JOURNAL Vol. 104:1 [2012-15] Reflections: An Interview with Morris L. Cohen* In December 2007, Bonnie Collier, then the Associate Librarian of Administration at Yale’s Lillian Goldman Law Library, interviewed Morris Cohen as part of a series of interviews with Yale Law School faculty called “Reflections.” This is an edited version of that interview. ¶1 Bonnie Collier: We’ve agreed to begin with a biographical conversation for the first part of the interview and then move on to an informal conversation. ¶2 Morris Cohen: Well, I guess if I’m beginning with my pre-Yale life, I will begin in Brooklyn, where I grew up. Brooklyn is, for most of its citizens, part of their very being. It’s at the center of their being. It’s a devotion that you never lose. Brooklyn was, at once, at least in the 1930s when I grew up there, cosmopolitan in its interests, certainly in its education. And while cosmopolitan, it was also provin- cial. That is, we were the center of the universe. Going across the bridge to Manhattan was like going to a foreign country. So it was a funny combination of things. ¶3 I can recall my main interest as a kid was sports. Participatory sports, although I wasn’t a very good athlete. I liked to participate in almost all the sports that were part of our seasonal cycle: stickball, street hockey, stoopball, and in sum- mer camp, which was another center of my world, I played all the traditional sports. ¶4 And spectator sports.
    [Show full text]
  • Michael Carley on the Secret World of American Communism
    Harvey Klehr, John E. Haynes, Fridrikh I. Firsov, eds.. The Secret World of American Communism. New Haven, Conn. and London: Yale University Press, 1995. xxxii + 348 pp. $25.00, cloth, ISBN 978-0-300-06183-3. Reviewed by Michael J. Carley Published on H-Russia (June, 1995) The American editors and their Russian col‐ is to show that the revisionist school is wrong in laborator set out in this book to describe the histo‐ all its main lines, and that American "communists' ry of the Communist International's relationship duplicity poisoned normal political relationships with the Communist Party of the United States and contributed to the harshness of the (CPUSA), based on a selection of documents anti)communist reaction of the late 1940s and drawn from the large holdings of the Comintern 1950s" (p. 106). archives in Moscow. The editors contend that the The editors appear determined to deal a mor‐ CPUSA was subservient to the Comintern; re‐ tal blow to the revisionist school, so determined ceived large subsidies from the Soviet govern‐ in fact that they do not address what it seems to ment; and closely cooperated through its secret this reviewer are important questions concerning apparatus with Soviet government intelligence the Comintern and its relations not only with oth‐ services. The editors also place their fndings er national communist parties, but with the Com‐ within the orthodox and revisionist historiogra‐ munist party of the Soviet Union (CPSU) and the phy of the CPUSA. The former school (including Soviet government. In the 1920s British, French, Theodore Draper and editors Klehr and Haynes) and American diplomats assumed that national believes "that the CPUSA was never an indepen‐ communist parties were mere creatures of the dent American political party but a creature given Comintern, which was an instrument of the Soviet life and meaning by its umbilical ties to the Soviet government controlled by the CPSU.
    [Show full text]
  • Decisionmaking in the Supreme Court, 1948-1958
    University of Chicago Law School Chicago Unbound Journal Articles Faculty Scholarship 1980 Unanimity and Desegregation: Decisionmaking in the Supreme Court, 1948-1958 Dennis J. Hutchinson Follow this and additional works at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/journal_articles Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Dennis J. Hutchinson, "Unanimity and Desegregation: Decisionmaking in the Supreme Court, 1948-1958," 68 Georgetown Law Journal 1 (1980). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Chicago Unbound. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of Chicago Unbound. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Unanimity and Desegregation: Decisionmaking in the Supreme Court, 1948-1958* DENNIS J. HUTCHINSON** By a process that has been the subject of considerable speculation, the United States Supreme Court reached a unanimous decision in the 1954 cases of Brown v. Board of Education and Bolling v. Sharpe, declaring unconstitutional statutory segregation in public school systems in the states and in the District of Columbia. Using previously unpublished material, Professor Hutchinson traces the rise and fall of unanimity in the segregation cases of the 1950's. The article delineates the Court's internal decisionmaking process and analyzes the role of unanimity in influencing the response of both the Court and the nation to the escalating challenges to the separationof the races. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • The Secret World of American Communism'
    H-Russia Carley on Klehr and Haynes and Firsov, 'The Secret World of American Communism' Review published on Friday, June 30, 1995 Harvey Klehr, John E. Haynes, Fridrikh I. Firsov, eds. The Secret World of American Communism. New Haven, Conn. and London: Yale University Press, 1995. xxxii + 348 pp. $25.00 (cloth), ISBN 978-0-300-06183-3. Reviewed by Michael J. Carley (Carleton University) Published on H-Russia (June, 1995) The American editors and their Russian collaborator set out in this book to describe the history of the Communist International's relationship with the Communist Party of the United States (CPUSA), based on a selection of documents drawn from the large holdings of the Comintern archives in Moscow. The editors contend that the CPUSA was subservient to the Comintern; received large subsidies from the Soviet government; and closely cooperated through its secret apparatus with Soviet government intelligence services. The editors also place their findings within the orthodox and revisionist historiography of the CPUSA. The former school (including Theodore Draper and editors Klehr and Haynes) believes "that the CPUSA was never an independent American political party but a creature given life and meaning by its umbilical ties to the Soviet Union" (p. 17). The revisionist school (including Maurice Isserman, Mark Naison, Ellen W. Schrecker), "holds that the American Communist movement was a normal, albeit radical, political participant in American democracy... with its roots in America's democratic, populist, and revolutionary past" (pp. 17-18). The editors' objective is to show that the revisionist school is wrong in all its main lines, and that American "communists' duplicity poisoned normal political relationships and contributed to the harshness of the anti)communist reaction of the late 1940s and 1950s" (p.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Soviet Spy Networks in the United States Throughout the Twentieth Century Julia S
    Union College Union | Digital Works Honors Theses Student Work 6-2015 An Analysis of Soviet Spy Networks in the United States Throughout the Twentieth Century Julia S. Shively Union College - Schenectady, NY Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalworks.union.edu/theses Part of the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Shively, Julia S., "An Analysis of Soviet Spy Networks in the United States Throughout the Twentieth Century" (2015). Honors Theses. 391. https://digitalworks.union.edu/theses/391 This Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Work at Union | Digital Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of Union | Digital Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. An Analysis of Soviet Spy Networks in the United States Throughout the Twentieth Century By Julia S. Shively ********* Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Honors in the Department of History Union College June, 2015 Chapter 1: Spies Before the War The Soviet Union and the United States have always had a complicated relationship. When the Bolshevik Revolution of 1921 brought the communist party to power in Russia, the United States government did not recognize the new regime. The communist ideologies of the newly established state did not line up well with the democratic ideals of the United States. These new communist principles threatened the strength of the American system, as labor disputes and the Great Depression gave citizens reason to question capitalism’s effectiveness. The fear of this system grew as the world progressed through the twentieth century when the Soviet Union shifted from ally to enemy in all but a few years.
    [Show full text]
  • The Spys Wife Free
    FREE THE SPYS WIFE PDF Reginald Hill | 266 pages | 15 Apr 2006 | Felony & Mayhem | 9781933397337 | English | New York, NY, United States Why Were the Rosenbergs Executed? - HISTORY His wife Lona was also an agent. His father had immigrated from an area near Kiev in present-day The Spys Wife. His mother was from Vilnius in present-day Lithuania ; the couple had met and The Spys Wife in New York. He was injured in a freshman game. No longer able to The Spys Wife footballhe was kept on scholarship as athletic manager. He graduated with a bachelor's degree in business, and after a year of graduate work transferred to the University of Illinois. There he was active in agitprop work for the National Student Leaguea communist front. He was declared persona non grata after one semester and returned to the Bronx, where he The Spys Wife a full member and organizer for the American Communist Party. InCohen joined the Mackenzie—Papineau Battalion and fought as a foreign national volunteer in the Spanish Civil Waras did others who were sympathetic to the anti-Franco movement. He met Amadeo Sabatinia career Soviet spy who recruited him. After being injured, in The Spys Wife Cohen returned to the United States. He began serving Soviet foreign intelligence. In mid, Cohen The Spys Wife drafted into the U. Army and served in Europe. He was discharged from the Army in November and returned to the United States where he resumed his espionage work for the Soviet Union. As Soviet spy networks were compromised in this period, connection with Soviet intelligence was temporarily ended, but resumed inwhen the Rezidentura ascertained that Cohen could be approached.
    [Show full text]
  • DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE South Region Counterintelligence Suspicious Contact Reporting 1 May 2019 Special Agent Jeff Elliott
    UNCLASSIFIED DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE South Region Counterintelligence Suspicious Contact Reporting 1 May 2019 Special Agent Jeff Elliott UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED “Among the potential pool of spies are those who are disgruntled or disenchanted, those who will seek revenge against a real or perceived grievance, those who are driven by money, & those who are egotistical & subject to flattery.” UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED Agenda 1) DSS Counterintelligence (CI) 2) What to Protect - Awareness 3) Foreign Intelligence Threats • Methods of Contact & Operations (MCMO) 4) Potential CI Indicators • Vignettes 5) Suspicious Contact Reporting Counterintelligence – Knowledge and Action UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED DSS Mission and Scope DSS Mission DSS supports national security and the warfighter, secures the nation’s technological base, and oversees the protection of U.S. and classified information in the hands of industry. Counterintelligence Mission DSS CI collects actionable threat information across cleared industry, analyses and articulates the threat for industry and U.S. Government leaders. Deter - Detect – Disrupt {Collection Activities} Scope - 12,000+ facilities; 1.2m people - 2 CI professional / 261 facilities (South Region, Field Office) - 12% of facilities report suspicious contacts UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED What Should We Protect? Any information that would degrade the nation’s advantage if compromised Protect anything that may: • Damage national security • Alter program Quality, Cost, or Schedule • Compromise the program or system capabilities
    [Show full text]
  • The Fight Against Russian “Illegal” Spies in Great Britain During the Early Cold War
    Volume 3, Issue 2: November 2020 The Fight against Russian “Illegal” Spies in Great Britain During the Early Cold War Trevor Barnes (Corpus Christi College, University of Cambridge) Introduction In September 1960 Britain’s counterintelligence service MI5 (also known as the Security Service) secretly broke into the London bank deposit box of a Canadian businessman, Gordon Lonsdale. They found a treasure trove of KGB spy paraphernalia: proof that Lonsdale was in fact a Russian deep cover “illegal” spy, whose real name was Konon Molody.1 Although Molody was the first Russian “illegal” spy MI5 uncovered in Britain during the Cold War, the Security Service had been far from complacent in the preceding years about the threat “illegals” posed and had obtained valuable information about their methods from a notorious and earlier American case. In 1957 the FBI had arrested in New York a man known as Rudolf Abel. The bureau shared valuable information about the case with the British, and the declassified Security Service files on Abel (real name William Fisher)2 provide valuable insights into the reaction of British and other Five Eyes intelligence agencies and their combat against Russian “illegals.” The arrest on January 7, 1961, of Konon Molody and two fellow KGB “illegals” in the Portland Spy Ring—Morris and Lona Cohen—was precipitated by the defection in Berlin 1 See Christopher Andrew, Defence of the Realm (London: Penguin, 2010), 485–88; Christopher Andrew and Vasili Mitrokhin, The Mitrokhin Archive: The KGB in Europe and the West (London: Penguin, 2000), 532–37; and Trevor Barnes, Dead Doubles: The Extraordinary Worldwide Hunt for One of the Cold War’s Most Notorious Spy Rings (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 2020), 184–85, 219–34.
    [Show full text]
  • MOSCOW RULES’: Soviet Intelligence and New Zealand During the Cold War
    ‘MOSCOW RULES’: Soviet intelligence and New Zealand during the Cold War Dr Aaron Fox Independent Cold War Historian Invercargill New Zealand ‘MOSCOW RULES’: Introduction I would like, today, to examine the alternative history of New Zealand – Soviet relations – the history of Soviet Espionage and New Zealand. My presentation is based upon the declassified archives of western intelligence agencies, notably the National Security Agency and the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation, and the New Zealand Security Intelligence Service. These western sources provide a glimpse into the workings of Soviet intelligence during the Cold War period, but the equivalent Soviet archives, and with them the full story of Soviet espionage, remained firmly closed to all comers. The title ‘Moscow Rules’ refers to the spy craft employed by Soviet intelligence agencies throughout the Cold War, for I will examine a variety of case studies which illustrate the Soviet way of spying. ‘MOSCOW RULES’: The KGB crest used on the first slide is to be found on wall of the Lubyanka in Moscow, which remains the headquarters of the Russian Intelligence Service. ‘MOSCOW RULES’: Introduction • A short pre-history of Soviet espionage and New Zealand • Their Trade is Treachery – how to become a Soviet spy! • Moscow Rules – Soviet Intelligence and New Zealand • A short tour of Wellington’s top espionage spots ‘MOSCOW RULES’: My talk will cover four main topics which, I consider, provide a broad survey of the history of Soviet intelligence and New Zealand: - A short pre-history of Soviet espionage and New Zealand - Their Trade is Treachery – how to become a Soviet spy! - Moscow Rules – Soviet Intelligence and New Zealand during the Cold War - A short tour of Wellington’s top espionage spots At this point I must make a short disclaimer: this presentation is based on some interim findings of a research project which has been based at the Department of History, University of Otago, since 1997.
    [Show full text]
  • Communism and Soviet Espionage in the 1940S Ellen Schrecker
    NORTH CAROLINA LAW REVIEW Volume 82 Number 5 Law, Loyalty, and Treason: How Can the Article 10 Law Regulate Loyalty Without Imperiling It? 6-1-2004 Stealing Secrets: Communism and Soviet Espionage in the 1940s Ellen Schrecker Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.unc.edu/nclr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Ellen Schrecker, Stealing Secrets: Communism and Soviet Espionage in the 1940s, 82 N.C. L. Rev. 1841 (2004). Available at: http://scholarship.law.unc.edu/nclr/vol82/iss5/10 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in North Carolina Law Review by an authorized administrator of Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STEALING SECRETS: COMMUNISM AND SOVIET ESPIONAGE IN THE 1940s ELLEN SCHRECKER' The fall of the Soviet Union and the end of the Cold War liberated thousands of pages of previously secret records. Coming from both sides of the former Iron Curtain, these materials have greatly expanded what is known about the long-hidden world of Soviet policymaking. The most sensational of those releases dealt with the Kremlin's espionage operations at the time of the World War II, revealing that somewhere between one and three hundred Americans and others gave information to Soviet intelligence agencies and that the Communist Party officials recruited many of these people. This Article examines this new material in order to understand espionage and the questions it raises about individual loyalty and disloyalty. It explores the activities of the main espionage networks and assesses the motivations of many intelligent and idealistic men and women who willingly entered the murky world of passwords, covernames, secret cameras, and all the other accoutrements of tradecraft or conspiracy that KGB operations required.
    [Show full text]