UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ COLD WAR COMRADES: LEFT-LIBERAL ANTICOMMUNISM and AMERICAN EMPIRE, 1941-1968 a Dissertation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ COLD WAR COMRADES: LEFT-LIBERAL ANTICOMMUNISM and AMERICAN EMPIRE, 1941-1968 a Dissertation UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ COLD WAR COMRADES: LEFT-LIBERAL ANTICOMMUNISM AND AMERICAN EMPIRE, 1941-1968 A dissertation presented in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in HISTORY OF CONSCIOUSNESS with an emphasis in AMERICAN STUDIES by Ari. N. Cushner September 2017 The dissertation of Ari Nathan Cushner is approved: _________________________________ Professor Barbara Epstein, chair _________________________________ Professor Eric Porter _________________________________ Matthew Lasar, Ph.D. _____________________________ Tyrus Miller Vice Provost and Dean of Graduate Studies Copyright © by Ari N. Cushner 2017 CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS vii INTRODUCTION Cold War Liberalism and the American Century 1 Midcentury Left-Liberal Anticommunism 6 Sources 14 Original Contributions 16 Methods 19 Literature Review 25 McCarthyism and Left-Liberal Anticommunism 28 New York Intellectuals and Neoconservatism 38 Cold War Anticommunism and American Empire 43 Chapter Outline 45 CHAPTER ONE Tragedy of Possibility: From a People’s Century to Cold War Empire 47 Henry Wallace and the Popular Front 51 Free World Association 56 Union for Democratic Action 65 Cold War (and Critics) 68 The 1948 Election 78 End of the People’s Century 90 CHAPTER TWO Following The New Leader: Left-Liberal Anticommunist Routes 95 “The Real Center of Anti-Communist Thought and Activity” 97 Norman Thomas (1884-1968) 113 Sidney Hook (1902-1989) 123 Arthur Schlesinger Jr. (1917-2007) 138 CHAPTER THREE Coming Together: Origins of the Left-Liberal Anticommunist Coalition 150 Committee for Cultural Freedom 151 The Waldorf Conference and Its Discontents 158 First They Took Manhattan: Americans for Intellectual Freedom 161 Towards a Defense of Cold War ‘Cultural Freedom’ 166 CHAPTER FOUR Speaking for Freedom: Left-Liberals as Cold War Propagandists 171 Left-Liberals and Cold War Propaganda 175 iii Then They Took Berlin: The Congress for Cultural Freedom 181 Chairman Hook’s Congress and the Committee 183 Mr. “Henry J. Laphorne” Goes to Washington 191 Left Wing of the CIA: Making the American Committee for Cultural Freedom 198 Enter, Comrade Thomas 202 CHAPTER FIVE Holding the Center: Left-Liberal Anticommunism in the Age of McCarthy 212 “Enemies from Within”: McCarthy and McCarthyism 213 “Combating Unintelligent Anticommunism” 220 Fractured Front: Breaking the American Committee for Cultural Freedom 233 CHAPTER SIX Falling Apart: Liberalism, the New Left, and Neoconservatism 251 Breaking the Silence 256 Things Fall Apart 260 Left-Liberal Anticommunism Revisited 269 CONCLUSION Beyond the American Century (?) 284 Reheating Cold War 288 After Empire 291 BIBLIOGRAPHY 340 iv ABSTRACT Ari Nathan Cushner Cold War Comrades: Left-Liberal Anticommunism and American Empire, 1941-1968 This dissertation examines the underappreciated history of what is commonly known as ‘cold war liberalism’ in relation to the rise of United States global power at the end of World War Two. More accurately described as ‘left-liberal anticommunism,’ this ideological orientation was produced through an alliance between three distinct species of political-intellectuals: democratic socialists personified by Norman Thomas, New Deal liberals typified by Arthur Schlesinger Jr., and anti-Stalinist leftists (former Trotskyists) embodied by Sidney Hook. These factions came together in the early 1940s, united in resistance to what remained of the pro-Communist ‘popular front’; the initial phase of their partnership culminated in the successful derailment of Henry Wallace’s 1948 presidential campaign. In the early 1950s their union was reconsolidated around a renewed effort to thwart Stalinist subversion at home and Soviet expansion abroad; the left-liberal anticommunist coalition concurrently helped shape a CIA-sponsored counterpropaganda campaign that came to be known as the ‘cultural cold war.’ In the mid 1950s this alliance of cold war comrades became fractured over the issue of McCarthyism, as a group that included former Trotskyist ‘New York intellectuals’ refused to join a condemnation of the Wisconsin senator’s redbaiting. With the defection of many on this proto- ‘neoconservative’ flank, which was becoming fixated on anti-Stalinism, those who remained in the left-liberal anticommunist camp cemented a commitment to the civil v rights and labor movements, while redoubling their support for Cold War foreign policy. The final iteration of their alliance, framed by the promotion of ‘rational’ as opposed to ‘obsessive anticommunism,’ lasted through the late 1960s, when it finally collapsed under the strain of an increasingly radical New Left and neoconservatives coalescing in opposition. Before disintegrating, the left-liberal anticommunist coalition pursued a domestic agenda of progressive reform attached to the legacy of the New Deal. Yet their utopian ideals were tempered by the realities of a global power struggle between the United States and the Soviet Union. By articulating their advocacy of social and economic justice from a standpoint of ‘anti-totalitarianism,’ left-liberal anticommunists unwittingly hastened the demise of a once-robust social- democratic tradition, while helping sustain the development of post-1945 American empire. vi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS There are countless souls to whom I am enduringly thankful for guidance and encouragement, particularly my patient and empathetic advisor and chair, Barbara Epstein, plus wise and gracious committee members Eric Porter and Matthew Lasar, Others at UCSC helped me navigate hurdles, intellectual and otherwise, including Gopal Balakrishnan, James Clifford, Angela Davis, Carla Freccero, Donna Haraway, Daniel Wirls; Sheila Peuse, Anne Spalliero, Marti Stanton, Melanie Wylie; and from the old American Studies department: Ann, Warren, and Raven Lane. Colleagues and friends read my work or helped in other ways, including Josh Brahinsky, Ranak Gandhi, Josh Haner, Adam Hefty, Rebecca Hodges, Allan Lumba, Todd Ormsbee, Trevor Sangrey, Don Sullivan, Rania Sweis, Brandon Wolfe-Hunnicut, Zack Whale, Jason Wozniak, Janet and Emerson Stafford. For pointing me in the right direction I am indebted to scholars Chris Chekuri, Anthony D’Agostino, Trevor Getz, Jon Judis, Michael Kazin, Tony Michels, Doug Rossinow, and fellow participants at the Heidelberg University Spring Academy in 2012; the 2013 BU American Political History Graduate Conference; and GWU–UCSB- LSE International Graduate Student Conference on the Cold War in 2013. I received invaluable assistance from NYPL’s Manuscripts and Archives Division—especially Thomas Lannon; Columbia’s Rare Book and Manuscripts Library; and NYU’s Tamiment Library. I was sustained by love from my father John, sister Aviva, partner Kira; Wonder and Ralphie. I dedicate this work to the memory of my mother, Judith Cushner, who made it, and so much more possible. All deficiencies should be without question attributed solely to me. vii ABBREVIATIONS ACCF American Committee for Cultural Freedom ADA Americans for Democratic Action AFL American Federation of Labor ACLU American Civil Liberties Union AIF Americans for Intellectual Freedom CIA Central Intelligence Agency CCNY City College of New York CCF Congress for Cultural Freedom CFR Council on Foreign Relations CIO Congress of Industrial Organizations CPUSA Communist Party of America ERP European Recovery Program MoMA Museum of Modern Art NAACP National Association for the Advancement of Colored People NCASP National Council of Arts Sciences and Professions OPC Office of Policy Coordination PCA Progressive Citizens of America SDF Social Democratic Federation SPA Socialist Party of America UDA Union for Democratic Action VoA Voice of America viii INTRODUCTION Cold War Liberalism and the American Century Whereas their nation became in the 20th Century the most powerful and the most vital nation in the world, nevertheless Americans were unable to accommodate themselves spiritually and practically to that fact. Hence they have failed to play their part as a world power. —Henry Luce, “The American Century,” February 1941 When the Marshall Plan will have brought about a strengthening of Europe… then we can perhaps hope for a stable agreement with the USSR. But to argue…that somehow an international miracle can be achieved by two men sitting around a table…is to play into the hands of both the isolationists and the Communists. —Arthur Schlesinger Jr., 1948 Everything’s perfect about the past, except how it led to the present. —“Homer J. Simpson,” 2011 Among the many uncertainties as Donald Trump took office in January 2017 was the question of his willingness to maintain what publishing magnate Henry Luce, in a widely-read 1941 Life editorial, dubbed “The American Century.” Speculation about a return to the policies of ‘isolationism’ notwithstanding, the likeliest scenario was that the United States under Trump would continue being what Luce described as “a dominant power in the world.”1 Yet the mere thought of an American president not embracing a policy of keeping the United States at the center of international affairs was unprecedented in recent history, and posed a sharp contrast to eight years earlier when Barack Obama entered the White House championing what he described in a 2007 Foreign Affairs article as a “mission… to provide global leadership.”2 Obama’s proud allegiance to the ‘American Century’ formed the cornerstone of his 1 administration’s foreign policy, cemented in a January 2012 ‘Defense Strategic’ Guidance titled “Sustaining U.S.
Recommended publications
  • The Age of Globalization (1945-2001)
    THE AGE OF GLOBALIZATION (1945-2001) Volume 8 of “AN ESSAY IN UNIVERSAL HISTORY” From an Orthodox Christian Point of View Vladimir Moss © Copyright Vladimir Moss, 2018: All Rights Reserved 1 The communists have been hurled at the Church like a crazy dog. Their Soviet emblem - the hammer and sickle - corresponds to their mission. With the hammer they beat people over the head, and with the sickle they mow down the churches. But then the Masons will remove the communists and take control of Russia… St. Theodore (Rafanovsky) of Belorussia (+1975). Capitalism has lifted the poor out of poverty. In 1918, 1.9 billion people lived in extreme poverty according to the World Bank’s statistics, or 52 per cent of the world’s population. This has fallen to 767 million people, or 10.7 per cent of the population in 2013. This dramatic improvement coincides with China and India moving to market economies. Hence it is the capitalists who love the poor, not the socialists who condemn them to poverty. Jacob Rees-Mogg, M.P. In order to have a democracy in society there must be a dictatorship in power. Anatoly Chubais. The best way to shake people out of their inertia is to put them in debt. Then you give them the power to realize their dreams overnight, while ensuring that they’ll spend years paying for their dreams. This is the principle upon which the stability of the Western world rests. A Serb. Twenty years ago, we said farewell to the Red Empire with damnations and tears.
    [Show full text]
  • The Student Interracial Ministry, Liberal Protestantism, and the Civil Rights Movement, 1960-1970
    Revolution and Reconciliation: The Student Interracial Ministry, Liberal Protestantism, and the Civil Rights Movement, 1960-1970 David P. Cline A dissertation submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a degree of doctor of philosophy in the Department of History. Chapel Hill 2010 Approved by: Advisor: Jacquelyn Dowd Hall Reader: W. Fitzhugh Brundage Reader: William H. Chafe Reader: Laurie F. Maffly-Kipp Reader: Heather A. Williams © 2010 David P. Cline ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT DAVID P. CLINE: Revolution and Reconciliation: The Student Interracial Ministry, Liberal Protestantism, and the Civil Rights Movement, 1960-1970 (Under the direction of Jacquelyn Dowd Hall) The Student Interracial Ministry (SIM) was a seminary-based, nationally influential Protestant civil rights organization based in the Social Gospel and Student Christian Movement traditions. This dissertation uses SIM’s history to explore the role of liberal Protestants in the popular revolutions of the 1960s. Entirely student-led and always ecumenical in scope, SIM began in 1960 with the tactic of placing black assistant pastors in white churches and whites in black churches with the goal of achieving racial reconciliation. In its later years, before it disbanded in mid-1968, SIM moved away from church structures, engaging directly in political and economic movements, inner-city ministry and development projects, and college and seminary teaching. In each of these areas, SIM participants attempted to live out German theologian Dietrich Bonhoeffer's exhortation to “bring the church into the world.” Revolution and Reconciliation demonstrates that the civil rights movement, in both its “classic” phase from the mid-1950s to the mid-1960s and its longer phase stretching over most of the twentieth century, was imbued with religious faith and its expression.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambridge Five Spy Ring Part 29 of 42
    192Hi _ill"I1_q :___|_ LwJ -£1 &#39;nrrnsss usncn :.cimox~uses s1K ._ On the -RAFs&#39;fftieth&#39;:. Kbirthda . __.t . s § 92 . &#39;. _&#39;.J;,&#39;- I , -. .:_ -_i. - O 4i . 9292 &#39; &#39;i 3 rr. 1.-Ir. F - . v , . 1 < r --. , r /. I °-A --,. -:"&#39;. " .-¢ -&#39; . _.._=-I Il &#39; E; -: T -V;L I , . i ~ - . L... i -.~ - &#39; . i ". - - : __ . __92 - r_ .._.|._ &#39;&#39;|. - -5 &#39; .- &#39;-&#39; " &#39; f I .92. - 0-.3 1- - &#39; ;_. -. _. *5%"¢ " &#39;I! TOMORROW the ifoyalAir Forceis 50years old: As rhe-aclhellit - 1 this anniversarythe air force that was oncethe mightiest mthe /59>.°-&#39;- 2;: y world nds its conventional strengthreduced to the level of "in..;"ff~;&#39;::&#39;7"1c9untrie.s._.li4i$q.I92;l!ji¢YNorth Korea, Sweden and and India. " i, < Q At present the"hittir&#39;i&#39;§_Foiw&#39;v&#39;erofthe*R.-A-¢F».-is-conce.ntr&#39;aie_d&#39; »&#39;-1&#39;.. inits-I " ageing V-bomber force. -in every other department .il&#39;l¢.31_I§!&#39;I__"d&#39;5&#39;ii"i=""""£=.r-" - has been drastic. - &#39; &#39; m""i*&#39;" l."li"&#39;§"-i Q &#39;Butdoes this matter? For in the H-bomb era, do conventional forces count? Would not any war quickly become an H-bombwar?. - O Today the Sunday Express publishes an article with an -",4-. l important hearing on these questions.it puts forward a revolu- tionary view of strategy in the years immediately ahead and , - &#39; _ exposes the blundersof oicial military plannersin writing-off the _&#39;,__£.:,&#39;11 -:»;v risks of conventional war.i-.= &#39; I.-=1"~ 92_ ~13-:1.
    [Show full text]
  • A Rumour Exists Among Cambridge Students
    A rumour exists among Cambridge students – that they may be discretely and mysteriously tapped on the shoulder during their time there, meaning they have been invited to become a spy. It’s difficult to determine if this is still true; presumably the new spies would be too secretive to let it slip. But many students live in hope for the day they will become the next James Bond. Cambridge has a long-running association with secret intelligence, which has helped, and hindered, Britain through times of war and peace. Reach Cambridge students live and learn in the same university that has been home to many infamous spies – not bad for a residential summer school! We’ll take a look at some of the most famous spies associated with the city. Christopher Marlowe Marlowe is more widely known as a famous playwright, with some suggesting that he is the true author of Shakespeare’s plays. He studied at Corpus Christi College, Cambridge, and it is alleged that it was during this time that he was recruited to be a spy. Elizabeth I presided over the first British Secret Services, used during her reign to gather intelligence against Catholics. Some evidence that Marlowe was involved in these activities is that he left Cambridge for long stretches of time that the university would usually not allow, and when he was in college, he bought much more food and drink than he would have been able to afford on his scholarship money alone. It was apparently the extra money he earned from being a government spy throughout his life which supplemented his income, allowing him to continue writing.
    [Show full text]
  • EXPLORE OUR Historic Sites
    EXPLORE LOCAL HISTORY Held annually on the third weekend in October, “Four Centuries in a Weekend” is a county-wide event showcasing historic sites in Union County. More than thirty sites are open to the public, featuring Where New Jersey History Began tours, exhibits and special events — all free of charge. For more information about Four Centuries, EXPLORE OUR Union County’s History Card Collection, and National Parks Crossroads of the American Historic Sites Revolution NHA stamps, go to www.ucnj.org/4C DEPARTMENT OF PARKS & RECREATION Office of Cultural & Heritage Affairs 633 Pearl Street, Elizabeth, NJ 07202 908-558-2550 • NJ Relay 711 [email protected] | www.ucnj.org/cultural Funded in part by the New Jersey Historical Commission, a division of the Department of State Union County A Service of the Union County Board of 08/19 Chosen Freeholders MAP center BERKELEY HEIGHTS Deserted Village of Feltville / Glenside Park 6 Littell-Lord Farmstead 7 CLARK Dr. William Robinson Plantation-Museum 8 CRANFORD Crane-Phillips House Museum 9 William Miller Sperry Observatory 10 ELIZABETH Boxwood Hall State Historic Site 11 Elizabeth Public Library 12 First Presbyterian Church / Snyder Academy 13 Nathaniel Bonnell Homestead & Belcher-Ogden Mansion 14 St. John’s Parsonage 15 FANWOOD Historic Fanwood Train Station Museum 16 GARWOOD 17 HILLSIDE Evergreen Cemetery 18 Woodruff House/Eaton Store Museum 19 The Union County Office of Cultural and Heritage KENILWORTH Affairs offers presentations to local organizations Oswald J. Nitschke House 20 at no charge, so your members can learn about: LINDEN 21 County history in general MOUNTAINSIDE Black history Deacon Andrew Hetfield House 22 NEW PROVIDENCE Women’s history Salt Box Museum 23 Invention, Innovation & Industry PLAINFIELD To learn more or to schedule a presentation, Drake House Museum 24 duCret School of Art 25 contact the History Programs Coordinator Plainfield Meetinghouse 26 at 908-436-2912 or [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • End of Instruction Notes DAY 2 1949 NATO—North Atlantic Treaty
    End of Instruction Notes DAY 2 1949 NATO—North Atlantic Treaty Organization. When it became apparent the UN could not stop war and aggression, the former Allies signed this treaty stating, “armed attack against one or more of them…shall be considered an attack against all.” Truman did not allow the US to return to isolationism after WWII. Warsaw Pact—after NATO allowed West Germany to re-arm. Soviet Union responded by organizing a military alliance in Eastern Europe Soviets successfully test atomic bomb this led to the arms race with the US China turns communist with Mao Zedong 1950s 1950 Korean War—divided after WWII, by Allies occupying forces withdrew in 1948-49. North Korea invaded the south to reunite them. The Soviets were boycotting the UN. The UN voted to defend South Korea. Douglas MacArthur headed troops after years of fighting he wanted to push war harder and to consider the bomb. Truman disagreed. Mac went behind his back and Truman fired him. 1952--Communists took control of Iran. CIA overthrew communists and replaced with Shah 1953—President Eisenhower wants to end the Korean War—Stalin died—Korea divided on 48th parallel. Vietnam conflict starting. Eisenhower sends advisors. Latin America—US feared Soviets might try to spread communism there US first then the USSR tested nuclear bombs 1954—CIA overthrew Guatemala gov’t to replace with US friendly one 1957—Soviet uses ballistic missiles armed with nuclear warheads. US lags behind in missile technology. Soviets also launch Sputnik, 1st satellite to orbit the earth—this leads to the space race.
    [Show full text]
  • Letter from Senator Joseph Mccarthy to the President of the United States
    Letter from Senator Joseph McCarthy to the President of the United States This letter from Senator Joseph McCarthy, Republican representative of Wisconsin, to President Harry Truman was written three days after McCarthy’s famous Wheeling Speech. This speech signaled McCarthy’s rise to influence, as he gained national attention by producing a piece of paper on which he claimed he had listed the names of 205 members of the Communist Party working secretly in the U.S. State Department. McCarthy was, at the time of this letter, beginning to exploit national concerns about Communist infiltration during the Cold War. This fear of infiltration was intensified by the Soviet Union’s recent development of the atomic bomb and the coming Communist takeover of China. “McCarthyism” however was not yet at its peak. Senator McCarthy here at first encourages President Truman to commit more resources to the war of containment being fought in South Korea, and secondly questioned the legitimacy and effectiveness of Truman’s loyalty program, signed into effect by Executive Order 9835 in 1947. This program required the FBI to run checks on almost anyone involved in the U.S. government and subsequently to launch investigations into any government employee with what could be presumed as questionable political associations. The Loyalty Program was not enough to satisfy Senator McCarthy, who suspected that a number of subversives had slipped through the investigation and remained in the State Department. President Truman made it clear that he would not take McCarthy’s accusations seriously and that the Senator was “the best asset the Kremlin has.”109 July 12, 1950 The President The White House Washington, D.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Decade Immediately Following the Second World War, Many Of
    ‘A Central Issue of Our Time’: Academic Freedom in Postwar American Thought A thesis presented to the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts Julian Tzara Nemeth August 2007 2 This thesis titled ‘A Central Issue of Our Time’: Academic Freedom in Postwar American Thought by JULIAN TZARA NEMETH has been approved for the Department of History and the College of Arts and Sciences by Kevin Mattson Professor of History Benjamin M. Ogles Dean, College of Arts and Sciences 3 Abstract NEMETH, JULIAN TZARA., M.A, August 2007, History ‘A Central Issue of Our Time’: Academic Freedom in Postwar American Thought (108 pp.) Director of Thesis: Kevin Mattson In the early years of the Cold War, more than one hundred American academics lost their jobs because university administrators suspected them of Communist Party membership. How did intellectuals respond to this crisis? Referring to contemporary books, articles, organizational statements, and correspondence, I argue that disputes over academic freedom helped shatter a tenuous liberal consensus, unite conservatives, and challenge defenses of professorial liberty among academia’s largest professional organization, the American Association of University Professors. Specifically, I show how Sidney Hook and Arthur Schlesinger Jr.’s dispute over academic freedom was representative of larger quarrels among liberals over McCarthyism. Conversely, I demonstrate that conservatives such as William Buckley Jr. and Russell Kirk overcame serious differences on academic freedom to present a united front against liberalism, in and outside of the academy. Finally, I show the difficulty an organization such as the AAUP encounters when defending professional values in a democratic society.
    [Show full text]
  • Nber Working Paper Series Henry Agard Wallace, The
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES HENRY AGARD WALLACE, THE IOWA CORN YIELD TESTS, AND THE ADOPTION OF HYBRID CORN Richard C. Sutch Working Paper 14141 http://www.nber.org/papers/w14141 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 June 2008 Thanks to Connie Chow and Hiroko Inoue for research assistance, to Susan B. Carter for critical advice, to Mason Gaffney for prodding questions that stimulated much further research, and to Norman Ellstrand for assistance with the plant biology. Financial support was provided by a National Science Foundation Grant: “Biocomplexity in the Environment, Dynamics of Coupled Natural and Human Systems.” Administrative support was provided by the Biotechnology Impacts Center and the Center for Economic and Social Policy at the University of California, Riverside. The views expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer- reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications. © 2008 by Richard C. Sutch. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. Henry Agard Wallace, the Iowa Corn Yield Tests, and the Adoption of Hybrid Corn Richard C. Sutch NBER Working Paper No. 14141 June 2008 JEL No. N12 ABSTRACT This research report makes the following claims: 1] There was not an unambiguous economic advantage of hybrid corn over the open-pollinated varieties in 1936.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ukrainian Weekly 1999, No.24
    www.ukrweekly.com INSIDE:• Soccer teams compete for annual Great Lakes Cup — page 9. • Yale conference examines Ukraine’s role in the 20th century — pages 10-11. • Ukrainian National Association Seniors mark 25th anniversary — centerfold. Published by the Ukrainian National Association Inc., a fraternal non-profit association Vol. LXVII HE KRAINIANNo. 24 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, JUNE 13, 1999 EEKLY$1.25/$2 in Ukraine Air Ukraine,T Uzbekistan AirwaysU New group to begin work Won Ukraine’s budget by Roman Woronowycz Parliament’s Budget Committee, Valerii members from the leftist factions; the Kyiv Press Bureau Khoroshkovskyi, a member of the faction holds a simple voting majority in agree to begin joint service National Democratic Party of Ukraine. Parliament, which gives them influence by Irene Jarosewich KYIV – In an effort to avoid the politi- “This committee is not formally asso- over the legislative process and as such cal squabbles and the inaccurate projec- P ARSIPPANY, N.J. – Air Ukraine and ciated with the Verkhovna Rada Budget the budget. However, Mr. tions that have been a hallmark of the Committee. It is an initiative committee,” Khoroshkovskyi said his group will make Uzbekistan Airways have signed an agreement country’s budget process in the last sever- to share air routes, including Air Ukraine’s tra- said Mr. Mitiukov. “We hope that it helps every effort to draw the Communists and al years, Ukraine’s Ministry of Finance the budget committee in its work to help Socialists into the effort. ditional New York to Kyiv route. Kyiv-bound and several members of Parliament flights now continue to Uzbekistan’s capital reach a consensus among the various Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Multicultural Cold War: Liberal Anti-Totalitarianism And
    MULTICULTURAL COLD WAR: LIBERAL ANTI-TOTALITARIANISM AND NATIONAL IDENTITY IN THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA, 1935-1971 by Gregory Smolynec Department of History Duke University Date: April 24, 2007 Approved: ___________________________ John Herd Thompson, Supervisor ___________________________ Warren Lerner ___________________________ Susan Thorne ___________________________ Suzanne Shanahan Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History in the Graduate School of Duke University 2007 ABSTRACT MULTICULTURAL COLD WAR: LIBERAL ANTI-TOTALITARIANISM AND NATIONAL IDENTITY IN THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA, 1935-1971 by Gregory Smolynec Department of History Duke University Date: April 24, 2007 Approved: ___________________________ John Herd Thompson, Supervisor ___________________________ Warren Lerner ___________________________ Susan Thorne ___________________________ Suzanne Shanahan An abstract of a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor in the Department of History in the Graduate School of Duke University 2007 Copyright by Gregory Smolynec 2007 Abstract In Cold War North America, liberal intellectuals constructed the Canadian and American national identities in contrast to totalitarianism. Theorists of totalitarianism described Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union as monolithic societies marked by absolutism and intolerance toward societal differences. In response, many intellectuals imagined Canada and the
    [Show full text]
  • Imperialism, Racism, and Fear of Democracy in Richard Ely's Progressivism
    The Rot at the Heart of American Progressivism: Imperialism, Racism, and Fear of Democracy in Richard Ely's Progressivism Gerald Friedman Department of Economics University of Massachusetts at Amherst November 8, 2015 This is a sketch of my long overdue intellectual biography of Richard Ely. It has been way too long in the making and I have accumulated many more debts than I can acknowledge here. In particular, I am grateful to Katherine Auspitz, James Boyce, Bruce Laurie, Tami Ohler, and Jean-Christian Vinel, and seminar participants at Bard, Paris IV, Paris VII, and the Five College Social History Workshop. I am grateful for research assistance from Daniel McDonald. James Boyce suggested that if I really wanted to write this book then I would have done it already. And Debbie Jacobson encouraged me to prioritize so that I could get it done. 1 The Ely problem and the problem of American progressivism The problem of American Exceptionalism arose in the puzzle of the American progressive movement.1 In the wake of the Revolution, Civil War, Emancipation, and radical Reconstruction, no one would have characterized the United States as a conservative polity. The new Republican party took the United States through bloody war to establish a national government that distributed property to settlers, established a national fiat currency and banking system, a progressive income tax, extensive program of internal improvements and nationally- funded education, and enacted constitutional amendments establishing national citizenship and voting rights for all men, and the uncompensated emancipation of the slave with the abolition of a social system that had dominated a large part of the country.2 Nor were they done.
    [Show full text]