DOCSLIB.ORG

Pro-Apartheid Israel Australian Labor Party Scraps Outstanding Anti-Israel Apartheid Candidate, Melissa Parke

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pro-Apartheid Israel Australian Labor Party Scraps Outstanding Anti-Israel Apartheid Candidate, Melissa Parke Pro-Apartheid Israel Australian Labor Party Scraps Outstanding Anti-Israel Apartheid Candidate, Melissa Parke By Gideon Polya Region: Oceania Global Research, April 18, 2019 Theme: History Decent Australians want the Labor Party to win in the forthcoming Australian elections for the sake of the young, poor, disabled, sick, elderly, unemployed, Indigenous and the environment. However the right wing-dominated Labor Opposition is merely better than the appalling present Coalition Government and is just as bad as a pro-Apartheid Israel, pro- Apartheid, and pro-war US lackey. Now pro-Apartheid Israel Labor has blatantly revealed its pro-Apartheid degeneracy by scrapping an outstanding, anti-Apartheid, anti-nuclear weapons and pro-human rights candidate,Melissa Parke, in the forthcoming Federal election. 1. Outstanding anti-Apartheid Labor candidate Melissa Parke forced to withdraw by pro-Apartheid Israel Australian Labor Party. It is relatively common for candidates to be scrapped just before Australian Federal elections because they have been found to have made racist, homophobic or other offensive comments, have been found to be legally ineligible because of having dual citizenship of Australia and another country, or have been alleged to have committed some offence from alleged bullying to alleged sexual assault. Indeed in relation to the present Federal election, an excellent female Labor candidate withdrew candidacy last year over allegations of bullying but was not re-instated as a candidate after the allegations were dismissed [1]. Three Coalition candidates have had to withdraw because of dual citizenship that is prohibited under Section 44 of the Australian Constitution [2, 3] (however while a Jewish Hungarian-origin Greens candidate for the seat of Canberra has requisitely expunged his Hungarian citizenship, the fervently pro-Zionist, Jewish Hungarian-origin, Coalition Government Treasurer, Josh Frydenberg, has apparently declined to legally expunge his Hungarian citizenship in an example of outrageous Zionist exceptionalism) [3-6]. Now another Coalition candidate has been outed for allegedly disparaging LGBTI (Lesbian, Gay, Homosexual, Transgender and Intersex) issues [7]. However the scrapping of outstanding, anti-Apartheid, anti-nuclear weapons and pro- human rights candidate and lawyer, Melissa Parke, in the forthcoming Federal election turns morality on its head – in any decent country it is surely the pro-Apartheid candidates who would be rejected by voters and not decent anti-Apartheid candidates. One is reminded of Samuel Butler’s dystopian novel “Erewhon” that describes a society in which sociopaths and psychopaths are empowered and treated with great solicitude whereas the sick are ostracized and maltreated [8]. This episode demonstrates the power of the Zionist Lobby in Zionist-perverted and subverted Australia, with the cravenly pro-Apartheid Israel, pro- Apartheid and US lackey Australian Labor Party (the ALP, and evidently an Apartheid Labor | 1 Party, an Anti-human rights Labor Party) removing a truly outstanding candidate, Melissa Parke, for fear of offending the rich and powerful supporters of nuclear terrorist, racist Zionist-run, genocidally racist, democracy-by-genocide Apartheid Israel. Indeed, surely the fundamental requirement for any candidates for office in a one-person- one-vote democracy like Australia is that they must unflinchingly support the proposition of one-person-one-vote. Presently it appears that in Australia all of Coalition candidates and most of Labor candidates in practice reject the proposition of one-person-one-vote by fervently supporting grossly human rights-violating Apartheid Israel – the only candidates unequivocally supporting one-person-one-vote are the Greens, the Socialists and a tiny body of decent Labor Leftists,. In addition to being anti-Apartheid and pro-one-person-one-vote, Melissa Parke is an exemplary former Federal MP, a long-standing Labor Party member, a human rights lawyer, and an anti-nuclear weapons Ambassador for the Nobel Prize-winning ICAN (International Campaign Against Nuclear Weapons [9]. Melissa Parke on her standing down from candidacy in the Australian Federal elections: “[Israeli treatment of Palestinians] worse than the South African system of apartheid… “I’ve had 20 years’ experience in international relations and law including living and working in the Middle East. My views are well known. But I don’t want them to be a running distraction from electing a Labor government which will take urgent and strong action on climate change. That’s why I have decided to withdraw my candidacy. I look forward to working and supporting the party in other ways” [9]. Melissa Parke must be commended for her loyalty to Labor and to one-person-one-vote. Further, she is quite correct in that climate change that existentially threatens 7.6 billion people is vastly more important than Israeli Apartheid that violates the lives of 14 million Palestinians. Unfortunately, just as Labor remorselessly ignores the human rights of Palestinians so grossly violated by Apartheid Israel, so its policy on climate change is largely confined to more rapidly increasing renewable energy than the climate criminal Coalition, although this is actually already being rapidly effected by individual home owners and corporations regardless of Federal Government policy. Further, Labor has exactly the same climate criminal policy as the effective climate change denialist , pro-gas and pro-coal COALition in supporting unlimited gas and coal exports. Greenhouse gas ) GHG) pollution from burning Australia’s world-leading gas and coal exports is twice that of Australia’s Domestic GHG pollution [10]. Pollutants from the burning of Australia’s coal exports are estimated to kill 75,000 people each year [11]. Indeed, ignored by the climate criminal Lib-Labs (the Liberal Party- National Party Coalition and Labor) are the horrible realities that taking land use and a the Global Warming Potential for methane into account, Australia’s per capita GHG pollution in tonnes CO2-e per person per year (116 tonnes if including its huge GHG-generating exports) is 55 times | 2 that of India (2.1 ) [12], and that Australia is among the world leaders for climate change inaction in 14 areas: (1) annual per capita greenhouse gas pollution, (2) live methanogenic livestock exports, (3) natural gas exports, (4) recoverable shale gas reserves that can be accessed by hydraulic fracturing (fracking), (5) coal exports, (6) land clearing and deforestation, (7) speciescide – species extinction, (8) coral reef destruction, (9) whale killing and extinction threat through global warming, (10) terminal carbon pollution budget exceedance, (11) per capita carbon debt, (12) GHG generating iron ore exports, (13) climate change inaction, and (14) complicity in worsening climate genocide [13]. Bill Shorten (Labor Leader of the Opposition): “[Melissa Parke has] done the right thing… I don’t share her views… I have a view that Israel has the right to security behind its borders and the Palestinian people have a legitimate issue in statehood” [9]. Pro-Apartheid Labor and the pro-Apartheid Coalition hide their utterly disgusting moral depravity behind the fig leaf of the “2-state solution”. However the “2-state solution” is now dead because US-, UK-, Canada-, Australia- and EU-backed Apartheid Israel has now ethnically cleansed 90% of Palestine. A clear, humane solution to the continuing human rights catastrophe in Palestine is a unitary state (one-state solution, bi-national state) as in post-Apartheid South Africa that would involve return of all refugees, zero tolerance for racism, equal rights for all, all human rights for all, economic decency for all, one-person-one-vote democracy, justice, goodwill, reconciliation, airport-level security, nuclear weapons removal, internationally-guaranteed national security initially based on the present armed forces, and untrammelled access for all citizens to all of Palestine [14-16]. Pro-Zionist Labor leader Bill Shorten evidently disagrees with Melissa Parkes’ expert view (deriving from being a human rights lawyer with extensive experience on the ground in the Middle East) that Israeli Apartheid is worse than South African Apartheid. Bill Shorten is utterly wrong and should abjectly apologize to the 14 million Indigenous Palestinian victims of genocidal Israeli Apartheid for his deeply offensive comments or otherwise simply remove himself from public life. Melissa Parkes’ view that Israeli Apartheid is an awful racist reality and is worse than South African Apartheid is consonant with the views of a huge body of anti-racist Jewish and non- Jewish humanitarians [17-25] . Thus, for example, those anti-Apartheid heroes stating that Israeli Apartheid is worse than South African Apartheid notably includeMandla Mandela (grandson of Nelson Mandela) (2017: “The movement from one settlement to another under heavy security checkpoints reminds us of a lighter experience in Apartheid South Africa of the ciskei homeland. This is more extreme than ciskei, because ciskeins were allowed to travel back and forth into King Williams Town and East London. Palestinians are confined to a settlement, even though in Ramallah they can see Jerusalem, but are not able to go without a permit from the Israeli government” [26], and anti-racist Jewish South African and anti-Apartheid hero Ronnie Kasrils: “Like the Gaza Strip, the West Bank is | 3 effectively a hermetically sealed prison. It is shocking to discover that certain roads
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Australian Media Portrayal of Israeli and Palestinian Casualties During the Gaza War of 2014
    Power and Silence: Australian Media Portrayal of Israeli and Palestinian Casualties during the Gaza War of 2014 Mayyada Mhanna, Edith Cowan University, Australia Debbie Rodan, Edith Cowan University, Australia The Asian Conference on Media & Mass Communication 2015 Official Conference Proceedings Abstract At one stage of the long-lasting Israeli–Palestinian conflict, Israel launched a military operation, Protective Edge, on the Gaza Strip in July–August of 2014. As a consequence, approximately 2,280 people died and over 11,000 people were injured, the majority of them Palestinian civilians (including children and women). These numerous casualties resulted in a pronounced interest in this particular event by international media such as CNN and the BBC, as well as other Western media including the Australian media. This paper investigates how Australian print and online media portrayed the Israeli and Palestinian casualties during the 2014 Israeli war on Gaza. Specifically, through using critical discourse analysis, it examines how the casualties were represented by four Australian news sources: The Australian, The Sydney Morning Herald, ABC and Crikey. Based on the concept of framing theory (a technique used to shape an event or issue, reflecting the power embedded in media texts), the paper analyses news items published in Australian mainstream media during the 2014 Israeli war on Gaza to identify the frames employed in reporting Israeli and Palestinian casualties. The conflict frame was dominant in the Australian print and online media coverage of casualties during the Gaza War of 2014. As a result, this coverage did not provide the contexts of news stories about casualties who were portrayed in a statistical frame.
    [Show full text]
  • Speech for Justice for Palestinians: a Human Rights Conundrum
    XVI: 2019 nr 4 DOI: 10.34697/2451-0610-ksm-2019-4-001 e-ISSN 2451-0610 ISSN 1733-2680 Linda Briskman prof., Western Sydney University ORCID: 0000-0002-5328-0339 Scott Poynting prof., Western Sydney University ORCID: 0000-0002-0368-2751 SPEECH FOR JUSTICE FOR PALESTINIANS: A HUMAN RIGHTS CONUNDRUM Introduction The question of free speech is vigorously debated in Australia and globally. As academics, we are interested in limitations to free speech when it serves the inter- ests of powerful dominant interests. We are also concerned about the concomitant right of academic freedom that purports to enable scholars to speak publicly and stridently about issues facing contemporary society, including those that are con- tested and where debates are heated. We do not limit our interest to the academic sphere as pervasive institutional barriers extend to other domains such as media and parliaments. Our paper specifi cally focuses on free-speech constriction in the Israel-Palestine confl ict of ideas. We examine this constraint in three ways in the Australian context: academic freedom, media freedom and freedom of political representation and expression. We confi ne our exploration to an Australian per- spective, while recognizing that similar patterns occur in other nations. 14 LINDA BRISKMAN, SCOTT POYNTING What makes Israel-Palestine a compelling exemplar is that what endures is not just active and polarized debates, but deliberate attempts by powerful sectors of societies to stifl e the voices of those who dissent from dominant discourses. The irony is that the universally enshrined human right to free speech is removed from those who speak out for human rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2014-15
    United Nations Association of Australia ANNUAL REPORT 2014-2015 UN Photo/Martine Perret 2 | UNAA ANNUAL REPORT 2014/2015 Contents > OUR MISSION 5 > NATIONAL PRESIDENT’S REPORT 6 > NATIONAL EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR’S REPORT 8 > UNAA HIGHLIGHTS 10 > UN 70th ANNIVERSARY 12 > WORLD HUMANITARIAN DAY 13 > UN DAY 2014 14 > UN HUMAN RIGHTS DAY 17 > UN EDUCATION 19 > PEACE AND SECURITY 20 > ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY 26 > GENDER EQUALITY 30 > YOUNG PEOPLE 32 > INTERNATIONAL ENGAGEMENT 33 > NATIONAL CONFERENCE 2014 NSW 34 > NATIONAL FINANCES 36 > OUR PEOPLE 38 UNAA ANNUAL REPORT 2014/2015 | 3 4 | UNAA ANNUAL REPORT 2014/2015 UN DAY OUR MISSION Established in 1946, the United Nations Association of Australia (UNAA) is a national non-profit organisation dedicated to promoting the work and ideals of the United Nations amongst Australians of all walks of life. We work to ensure that the UN is relevant to the peoples that it exists to serve. By strengthening the three pillars of the United Nations - security, development and human rights - we can build a more peaceful, more prosperous and more just world for our succeeding generations.” BAN KI-MOON UNAA ANNUAL REPORT 2014/2015 | 5 NATIONAL PRESIDENT’S This year we have celebrated the 70th anniversary of the signing of the United Nations Charter marking the founding of the organisation. The occasion has provided an opportunity to reflect on the UN’s history and achievements in international peace and security, environmental sustainability and human development amongst other things. It has also been a time to look to the future of the UN to consider how we can improve and adapt current some of its practices and processes to better deal with pressing international issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact Analysis Legislative and Policy Achievements of EMILY's List
    When Women Support Women, Emily’s LIST Women Win AUSTRALIA Impact analysis Legislative and policy achievements of EMILY’s List women in power Federal Parliament 2007-2013 Emily’s LIST AUSTRALIA When Women EMILY’s List Australia Phone (03) 8668 8120 Fax (03) 8668 8125 Support Women, [email protected] www.emilyslist.org.au Women Win 1/3/14 9:01:26 PM Contents Foreword 2 Introduction 3 EMILY’s List - a snapshot 4 Legislative reform 5 EMILY’s List in Federal Parliament 7 Case study: Julia Gillard 8 Legislative Achievements 9 Choice 9 Case study: Jenny Macklin 10 Child Care 11 Diversity 12 Equity 13 When Women Equal Pay 14 Case study: Tanya Plibersek 14 Support Women, Conclusion 16 Women Win Acknowledgments 16 Appendix 1: EMILY’s List supported women MPs 2007-2013 18 Appendix 2: EMILY’s List supported women in ministries, 2007-2013 19 Appendix 3: Legislation and policy initiatives 2007-2013 20 References 25 Background Note: This impact analysis was commissioned by the EMILY’s List National Committee and prepared by Sophie Arnold as part of a Bachelor of Legal Studies (Latrobe University) placement with EMILY’s List Australia. We gratefully acknowledge contributions from EL’s National Co-Convenors Tanja Kovac and Senator Anne McEwen, EL’s National Coordinator, Lisa Carey and Leonie Morgan, as well as all of our EMILY’s List MPs in the preparation of this report. Contents Foreword 2 Introduction 3 EMILY’s List - a snapshot 4 Legislative reform 5 EMILY’s List in Federal Parliament 7 Case study: Julia Gillard 8 Legislative Achievements
    [Show full text]
  • Report 162: 20Th Anniversary Seminar
    The Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia 20th Anniversary Seminar Report 162 May 2016 Canberra © Commonwealth of Australia 2016 ISBN 978-1-74366-512-1 (Printed version) ISBN 978-1-74366-513-8 (HTML version) This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivs 3.0 Australia License. The details of this licence are available on the Creative Commons website: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/au/. Contents Membership of the Committee ............................................................................................................ v Terms of reference ............................................................................................................................. vii List of abbreviations .......................................................................................................................... viii 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 1 Purpose of the report ................................................................................................................ 1 Program and participants ......................................................................................................... 1 Background ............................................................................................................................... 2 2 Reflections and assessment .............................................................................. 5 Introduction ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 'I'm Not Expecting to Lose …': the Election Overview and Campaign Narrative
    2 ‘I’m Not Expecting to Lose …’: The Election Overview and Campaign Narrative Marija Taflaga and John Wanna The countdown to a combative election The quotation from Malcolm Turnbull in the chapter title reflected the restrained optimism of the newly installed prime minister facing his first election as leader in the dying days of the 2016 federal election campaign. He spoke these prophetic words reluctantly when asked persistently by TV personality Annabel Crabb on her show Kitchen Cabinet about his expectations of the outcome. While Turnbull’s prediction would ultimately prove accurate (only just!), Turnbull and his Coalition colleagues would get the fright of their lives when the counting began. This chapter provides a chronology of the federal election campaign of 2016. It explores the antecedents of the main events and outcomes, and looks to provide reasons for the largely unexpected closeness of the eventual result. The chapter is broadly divided into five parts: (1) the background context and government’s leadership transition along with the delicate timing and deliberate preparations for a double-dissolution election; (2) the flurry of last-minute policy announcements and budgetary measures; (3) the meandering nature of the lengthy campaign from the standpoint of the main protagonists followed by the resort to 17 DOUBLE DISILLUSION banal sloganeering; (4) the volatile election outcome and the descent into uncertainty; and, finally, (5) the immediate aftermath of the election and an assessment on the wisdom of calling a double dissolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Redistribution of Western Australia Into Electoral Divisions JANUARY 2016
    Redistribution of Western Australia into electoral divisions JANUARY 2016 Report of the augmented Electoral Commission for Western Australia Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 Feedback and enquiries Feedback on this report is welcome and should be directed to the contact officer. Contact officer National Redistributions Manager Roll Management Branch Australian Electoral Commission 50 Marcus Clarke Street Canberra ACT 2600 Locked Bag 4007 Canberra ACT 2601 Telephone: 02 6271 4411 Fax: 02 6215 9999 Email: [email protected] AEC website www.aec.gov.au Accessible services Visit the AEC website for telephone interpreter services in 18 languages. Readers who are deaf or have a hearing or speech impairment can contact the AEC through the National Relay Service (NRS): – TTY users phone 133 677 and ask for 13 23 26 – Speak and Listen users phone 1300 555 727 and ask for 13 23 26 – Internet relay users connect to the NRS and ask for 13 23 26 ISBN: 978-1-921427-42-8 © Commonwealth of Australia 2016 © State of Western Australia 2016 The report should be cited as augmented Electoral Commission for Western Australia, Redistribution of Western Australia into electoral divisions. 15_0525 The augmented Electoral Commission for Western Australia (the augmented Electoral Commission) has undertaken a redistribution of Western Australia. In developing and considering the impacts of the redistribution, the augmented Electoral Commission has satisfied itself that the electoral divisions comply with the requirements of the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 (the Electoral Act). The augmented Electoral Commission commends its redistribution for Western Australia. This report is prepared to fulfil the requirements of section 74 of the Electoral Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Australia and North Africa – a Complex Modern Reality
    Australia and North Africa – A Complex Modern Reality Hannah Climas Thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of International Studies Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences Flinders University October 2017 Declaration I certify that this thesis does not incorporate without acknowledgment any material previously submitted for a degree or diploma in any university; and that to the best of my knowledge and belief it does not contain any material previously published or written by another person except where due reference is made in the text. Hannah Climas October 2017 ii Acknowledgements To my loving husband Aaron and daughter Elizabeth for their unconditional encouragement and words of wisdom. Special mention goes to the countless flower crowns that I was given by my very insistent two-year-old as inspiration; you consistently demonstrated that every action’s an act of creation. To my supervisor Dr. Tanya Lyons for her professional and personal support during the past three years, your advice has been beyond valuable and I can only offer my sincere apologies for my constant failure to check my emails. Thank you for making this experience such a rich and fulfilling one. To my friends for making sure that I stayed hydrated (Madeline); for helping me with the most basic of mathematics (Jacqui); for shouting me coffee (Angus); for listening to me vent at the most inopportune times (Carissa); and for reminding me that there’s a world beyond my thesis (Dan and Adelle). Thank you for reminding me that sometimes, what feels like failure isn’t failure at all.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Assessment - Jewish People Policy Institute
    2014-2015 Annual Assessment - Jewish People Policy Institute ANNUAL ASSESSMENT The Situation and Dynamics of the Jewish People 5775 Jewish Demography 70 Years aer the Shoah "Drivers" Aecting the Israel-U.S. Relationship Israel-Diaspora Dialogue on the Use of Force Video Games against De-Legitimization of Israel THE JEWISH PEOPLE POLICY INSTITUTE (Established by the Jewish Agency for Israel) Ltd. (CC) www.jppi.org.il Givat Ram Campus • P.O.B. 39156 Jerusalem 9139101 [email protected] Tel: 972-2-5633356 • Fax: 972-2-5635040 ISBN 978-965-7549-08-7 Partners and Members Board of Directors and Professional About JPPI of the General Meeting: Guiding Council: The Jewish People Policy Institute (JPPI) is an independent professional policy planning think tank Lester Crown and Charles Goodman Co-Chairs incorporated as a private non-profit company in Israel. The mission of the Institute is to ensure the thriving on behalf of Crown Family Philanthropies Stuart Eizenstat of the Jewish people and the Jewish civilization by engaging in professional strategic thinking and planning Dennis Ross William Davidson Foundation on issues of primary concern to world Jewry. Located in Jerusalem, the concept of JPPI regarding the Jewish Associate Chair people is global, and includes aspects of major Jewish communities with Israel as one of them, at the core. Nathan and Frances Kirsh Leonid Nevzlin JPPI’s activities are action-oriented, placing special emphasis on identifying critical options and analyzing their on behalf of the Kirsh Family Foundation Members of the Board potential impact on the future. To this end, the Institute works toward developing professional strategic and Irina Nevzlin Kogan Elliott Abrams Yohanna Arbib long-term policy perspectives exploring key factors that may endanger or enhance the future of the Jewish on behalf of Nadav Foundation Irwin Cotler People.
    [Show full text]
  • War Decolonisation in Southeast Asia Correspond
    From Commonwealth Responsibility to the National Interest: Australia and Post- War Decolonisation in Southeast Asia Corresponding author: Dr Dan Halvorson School of Government & International Relations Glyn Davis Building N72 -1.32 Griffith University, Nathan Campus Brisbane QLD 4111 Australia Tel: +61 07 3735 6420 Mob: +61 0404031311 E-mail: [email protected] 1 From Commonwealth Responsibility to the National Interest: Australia and Post- War Decolonisation in Southeast Asia Abstract This article re-examines the drivers of post-war Australian foreign policy in Southeast Asia. The central argument is that the motive of Commonwealth responsibility has not been given sufficient explanatory weight in interpreting Australia’s post-war engagement with Southeast Asia under both Australian Labor Party (ALP) and Liberal-Country Party (Coalition) governments. The responsibility expressed by Australian policy makers for the decolonisation of the Straits Settlements, Malayan Peninsula, and British Borneo Territories cannot be adequately understood within a Cold War ideological framework of anti-communism. Nor can it be explained by the instrumental logic of forward defence. The concept of responsibility is theorised as a motivation in foreign policy analysis and applied to Australian involvement with British decolonisation in Southeast Asia between 1944 and 1971. The article finds that in its approach to decolonisation, Australia was driven as much by normative sentiments of responsibility to the Commonwealth as it was by instrumental calculations of Cold War strategic interest. This diminished with the end of Indonesia’s ‘Confrontation’ of Malaysia in 1966 and subsequent British commitment to withdraw from East of Suez. Australia’s policy discourse becomes more narrowly interest-based after this, especially evident in Australia’s negotiations with Malaysia and Singapore over the FPDA from 1968-71.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Chronicles Commonwealth of Australia
    Australian Journal of Politics and History: Volume 62, Number 2, 2016, pp.282-334. This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Wanna, J. (2016), Commonwealth of Australia July to December 2015. Australian Journal of Politics & History, 62: 282–287. doi:10.1111/ Political Chronicles ajph.12250, which has been published in final form at http:// doi.org/10.1111/ajph.12250 This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving. Commonwealth of Australia http://olabout.wiley.com/WileyCDA/Section/id-828039.html (Publisher journal website as of 11/10/2016) July to December 2015 JOHN WANNA The Australian National University “They took some honey, and plenty of money…” Prising Bronwyn Bishop from the Speakership, a Prelude to Leadership Transition Prime Minister Tony Abbott was begrudgingly forced to dump his personal favourite, Bronwyn Bishop, from the presiding officer’s position in the House of Representatives, after her reluctance to explain or apologise for abusing her travel entitlements. But Abbott’s stoic defence of his beleaguered New South Wales colleague came at a high price to his own leadership standing in the aftermath of the entitlements scandal. In August 2015 the septuagenarian Bishop became the third Speaker of the Australian parliament to be brought down in less than four years. In the Australian parliament, the office of speakership was traditionally a job for worthy but uninspiring “quiet-lifers” who enjoyed the fruits of office without having to do a great deal or manage a portfolio. The “grace and favour” job had long been a sinecure at the disposal of the governing party reserved for those not managing to make the ministry.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2019 Australian Federal Election
    MORRISON'S MIRACLE THE 2019 AUSTRALIAN FEDERAL ELECTION MORRISON'S MIRACLE THE 2019 AUSTRALIAN FEDERAL ELECTION EDITED BY ANIKA GAUJA, MARIAN SAWER AND MARIAN SIMMS In memory of Dr John Beaton FASSA, Executive Director of the Academy of the Social Sciences in Australia from 2001 to 2018 and an avid supporter of this series of election analyses Published by ANU Press The Australian National University Acton ACT 2601, Australia Email: [email protected] Available to download for free at press.anu.edu.au ISBN (print): 9781760463618 ISBN (online): 9781760463625 WorldCat (print): 1157333181 WorldCat (online): 1157332115 DOI: 10.22459/MM.2020 This title is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). The full licence terms are available at creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode Cover design and layout by ANU Press Cover photograph: Scott Morrison Campaign Day 11. Photo by Mick Tsikas, AAP. This edition © 2020 ANU Press CONTENTS Figures . ix Plates . xiii Tables . .. xv Abbreviations . xix Acknowledgements . xxiii Contributors . xxv Foreword . xxxiii 1 . Morrison’s miracle: Analysing the 2019 Australian federal election . 1 Anika Gauja, Marian Sawer and Marian Simms Part 1. Campaign and context 2 . Election campaign overview . 21 Marian Simms 3 . The rules of the game . 47 Marian Sawer and Michael Maley 4 . Candidates and pre‑selection . .. 71 Anika Gauja and Marija Taflaga 5 . Ideology and populism . 91 Carol Johnson 6 . The personalisation of the campaign . 107 Paul Strangio and James Walter 7 . National polling and other disasters . 125 Luke Mansillo and Simon Jackman 8 .
    [Show full text]