DOCSLIB.ORG

The 2019 Australian Federal Election

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

MORRISON'S MIRACLE THE 2019 AUSTRALIAN FEDERAL ELECTION MORRISON'S MIRACLE THE 2019 AUSTRALIAN FEDERAL ELECTION EDITED BY ANIKA GAUJA, MARIAN SAWER AND MARIAN SIMMS In memory of Dr John Beaton FASSA, Executive Director of the Academy of the Social Sciences in Australia from 2001 to 2018 and an avid supporter of this series of election analyses Published by ANU Press The Australian National University Acton ACT 2601, Australia Email: [email protected] Available to download for free at press.anu.edu.au ISBN (print): 9781760463618 ISBN (online): 9781760463625 WorldCat (print): 1157333181 WorldCat (online): 1157332115 DOI: 10.22459/MM.2020 This title is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). The full licence terms are available at creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode Cover design and layout by ANU Press Cover photograph: Scott Morrison Campaign Day 11. Photo by Mick Tsikas, AAP. This edition © 2020 ANU Press CONTENTS Figures . ix Plates . xiii Tables . .. xv Abbreviations . xix Acknowledgements . xxiii Contributors . xxv Foreword . xxxiii 1 . Morrison’s miracle: Analysing the 2019 Australian federal election . 1 Anika Gauja, Marian Sawer and Marian Simms Part 1. Campaign and context 2 . Election campaign overview . 21 Marian Simms 3 . The rules of the game . 47 Marian Sawer and Michael Maley 4 . Candidates and pre‑selection . .. 71 Anika Gauja and Marija Taflaga 5 . Ideology and populism . 91 Carol Johnson 6 . The personalisation of the campaign . 107 Paul Strangio and James Walter 7 . National polling and other disasters . 125 Luke Mansillo and Simon Jackman 8 . The perilous polling of single seats . 149 Murray Goot Part 2. The results 9 . House of Representatives results . 179 Ben Raue 10 . The Senate result . 203 Antony Green 11 . The election in the States, Territories and regions . 223 Nick Economou, Zareh Ghazarian, Narelle Miragliotta, Will Sanders, Rodney Smith, John Warhurst and Paul Williams 12 . Voter behaviour . 253 Shaun Ratcliff, Jill Sheppard and Juliet Pietsch Part 3. Actors 13 . The Australian Labor Party . 277 Rob Manwaring 14 . The Liberal Party . 295 Nicholas Barry 15 . The National Party of Australia . 313 Geoff Cockfield 16 . The Australian Greens . 329 Stewart Jackson 17 . The minor parties . 343 Glenn Kefford 18 . The Independents . 357 Jennifer Curtin and Jill Sheppard 19 . Business . 373 John Wanna 20 . Unions . 397 Andrew Scott 21 . Third parties and think tanks . 411 Ebony Bennett Part 4. Media 22 . Media coverage . 431 Andrea Carson and Lawrie Zion 23 . Party campaign communications . 455 Stephen Mills 24 . Cartoons, memes and videos . 473 Lucien Leon FIGURES Figure 3.1 Political party advertising spending, 1 September 2018 – 18 May 2019. 53 Figure 3.2 Proportion of House of Representatives votes by voting method ......................................62 Figure 3.3 Rise in proportion of House of Representatives votes cast before election day. 64 Figure 7.1 ALP first-preference voting intentions between the 2016 and 2019 federal elections ............................130 Figure 7.2 Coalition first-preference voting intentions between the 2016 and 2019 federal elections .....................131 Figure 7.3 Coalition two-party-preferred voting intentions between the 2016 and 2019 federal elections .....................132 Figure 7.4 First-preference voting intentions house effects, 2016–19 .........................................134 Figure 7.5 Coalition two-party-preferred voting intentions house effects, 2016–19. .135 Figure 7.6 Coalition two-party-preferred voting intentions historical house effects, 2004–19 .......................138 Figure 7.7 Labor first-preference voting intentions historical house effects, 2004–19. .139 Figure 7.8 Coalition first-preference voting intentions historical house effects, 2004–19. 140 Figure 7.9 Dispersion before an election, 2004–19 ..............143 Figure 9.1 Total House of Representatives candidates per election, 1990–2019 .......................................183 ix MORRISON'S MIRACLE Figure 9.2 Labor two-party-preferred vote in each State compared with the remainder of the country, 1958–2019 ............186 Figure 9.3 Seats decided on preferences, 1993–2019 ............188 Figure 9.4 Labor two-party-preferred vote before and on election day .......................................190 Figure 9.5 Informal voting rate at federal elections, 1990–2019 ....191 Figure 9.6 Non-classic races in federal elections, 1990–2019 ......196 Figure 10.1 Example of the Senate ballot paper ................206 Figure 12.1 First-preference vote intention for the House of Representatives, by age .............................257 Figure 12.2 Non-voting for the House of Representatives, by age ...257 Figure 12.3 Support for the use of negative gearing for investment properties, by age. 258 Figure 12.4 First-preference vote intention for the House of Representatives, by support of the use of negative gearing for investment properties and age .......................259 Figure 12.5 Party support by business or trust ownership and household income ...............................261 Figure 12.6 First-preference vote intention for the House of Representatives, by home ownership and household income ...261 Figure 12.7 First-preference defections from Labor for the House of Representatives, by household income .................262 Figure 12.8 First-preference defections from the Coalition for the House of Representatives, by household income ...........263 Figure 12.9 Support for the use of negative gearing for investment properties, by home ownership and household income ......263 Figure 12.10 Vote intention by support for the use of negative gearing for investment properties and household income .....264 Figure 12.11 First-preference vote intention for the House of Representatives, by ancestry .........................268 Figure 12.12 Belief that rights for same-sex couples have gone too far, by ancestry ..................................268 x FIGURES Figure 12.13 First-preference defections from Labor for the House of Representatives, by Chinese ancestry ..................269 Figure 12.14 First-preference defections from the Coalition for the House of Representatives, by Chinese ancestry .............270 Figure 13.1 ALP first preferences, 1980–2019 .................279 Figure 13.2 Centre-left parties’ share of the vote ................280 Figure 13.3 Key policy offerings of major parties, 2019 federal election ..........................................281 Figure 15.1 Country/National Party share of primary votes and seats for the House of Representatives at national elections ...319 Figure 15.2 Ratings for the factors of ‘security and patriotism’ and ‘equality and freedom’ ............................324 Figure 16.1 House and Senate results for the Australian Greens, 1993–2019 .......................................332 Figure 17.1 First-preference votes for minor parties and Independents. 344 Figure 22.1 2019 election coverage in daily metropolitan Australian newspapers ...............................435 Figure 22.2 Comparing sentiment of stories about parties and their leaders. .437 Figure 22.3 Comparing the proportions of stories in the 2016 and 2019 election campaigns that were not neutral in sentiment. 437 Figure 22.4 Story topics most commonly featured on the front pages of the daily press during the 2019 election campaign ........438 Figure 22.5 Ratings figures for Sky News content on free-to-air television during the 2019 election campaign ..............442 Figure 22.6 The total number of online interactions with the major political parties and their leaders’ political communications before and during the 2019 election campaign .............447 xi PLATES Plate 3.1 Chisholm polling place sign mimicking an AEC notice ....60 Plate 17.1 Copy of UAP text message sent to voters .............350 Plate 23.1 ALP 30-second television commercial, ‘Scott Morrison— Only for the Top End of Town’ ........................459 Plate 23.2 Liberal Party 30-second television commercial, ‘Australia can’t afford Labor’ ..........................463 Plate 24.1 Tony Abbott, Tango Avenue Street Library ...........475 Plate 24.2 Various responses to Tango Avenue Street Library, Tony Abbott, Twitter account, 20–21 March 2019 .........476 Plate 24.3 Still showing an image sequence from Captain GetUp video, 13 April 2019 . .477 Plate 24.4 Still showing an image sequence from GetUp! Australia video, 23 April 2019 . .477 Plate 24.5 Jon Kudelka, ‘Modern campaigning’ ................478 Plate 24.6 David Pope, ‘Economic inputs of Australia!’ ..........479 Plate 24.7 Michael Leunig, ‘Short story’ ......................479 Plate 24.8 Cartoon by Andrew Dyson .......................480 Plate 24.9 Cartoon by Mark Knight .........................480 Plate 24.10 David Rowe, ‘Packing room …’. 482 Plate 24.11 David Rowe, ‘Hold the front page!’ ................482 Plate 24.12 Pat Campbell, ‘Army of the un-policies’ .............483 Plate 24.13 Cathy Wilcox, ‘Team ScoMo’ ....................483 Plate 24.14 Meme by Innovative and Agile Memes .............484 xiii MORRISON'S MIRACLE Plate 24.15 Meme by ALP Spicy Meme Stash .................484 Plate 24.16 Still showing an image sequence from The Weekly with Charlie Pickering’s mash-up video ‘Australian Labor Party Robotics’, 10 May 2019 .............................485 Plate 24.17 Still showing an image sequence from The Weekly with Charlie Pickering’s mash-up video ‘Rebranding Scott Morrison’,
Recommended publications
  • Procedural Digest 24 25 26 27 28

    Procedural Digest 24 25 26 27 28

    HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES August/ September 2020 M T W T F Procedural Digest 24 25 26 27 28 No. 12 31 1 2 3 4 46th Parliament 24 August – 3 September 2020 Selected entries contain links to video footage via Parlview. Please note that the first time you click a [Watch] link, you may need to refresh the page (ctrl+F5) for the correct starting point. Bills 12.01 Jobkeeper bill introduced and passed all stages in one sitting The Treasurer presented the Coronavirus Economic Response Package (Jobkeeper Payments) Amendment Bill 2020 on 26 August. In his second reading speech, the Treasurer thanked the opposition for its support in progressing the bill through the parliament quickly to provide certainty to Australian businesses and employees. Following his speech, the House gave leave for the debate to be made an order of the day for a later hour. During the day, 28 members contributed to the second reading debate. At the conclusion of the debate, a second reading amendment moved by the shadow Treasurer was negatived on division and the question ‘that the bill be read a second time’ was carried on the voices. Following a message from the Governor-General recommending appropriation, the bill proceeded to the consideration in detail stage and several opposition amendments were negatived on division. Consideration in detail concluded and, by leave, an assistant minister moved the third reading. The question ‘that the bill be read a third time’ was carried on the voices. The Speaker granted the Manager of Opposition Business indulgence a number of times over the sitting fortnight to place on the record the voting intentions of independent and minor party members unable to attend the sittings due to the pandemic.
  • Chronology of Same-Sex Marriage Bills Introduced Into the Federal Parliament: a Quick Guide

    Chronology of Same-Sex Marriage Bills Introduced Into the Federal Parliament: a Quick Guide

    RESEARCH PAPER SERIES, 2017–18 UPDATED 24 NOVEMBER 2017 Chronology of same-sex marriage bills introduced into the federal parliament: a quick guide Deirdre McKeown Politics and Public Administration Section On 15 November 2017, the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) announced the results of the voluntary Australian Marriage Law Postal survey. The ABS reported that, of the 79.5 per cent of Australians who expressed a view on the question Should the law be changed to allow same-sex couples to marry?, ‘the majority indicated that the law should be changed to allow same-sex couples to marry, with 7,817,247 (61.6 per cent) responding Yes and 4,873,987 (38.4 per cent) responding No’. On the same day Senator Dean Smith (LIB, WA) introduced, on behalf of eight cross-party co-sponsors, a bill to amend the Marriage Act 1961 (Cth) so as to redefine marriage as ‘a union of two people’. This is the fifth marriage equality bill introduced in the current (45th) Parliament, while six bills were introduced into the previous (44th) Parliament. Since the 2004 amendment to the Marriage Act 1961 (Cth) which inserted the current definition of marriage, 23 bills dealing with marriage equality or the recognition of overseas same-sex marriages have been introduced into the federal Parliament. Four bills have come to a vote: three in the Senate (in 2010, 2012 and 2013), and one in the House of Representatives (in 2012). These bills were all defeated at the second reading stage; consequently no bill has been debated by the second chamber.
  • Disaster Risk Reduction in Australia

    Disaster Risk Reduction in Australia

    Disaster Risk Reduction in Australia Status Report 2020 Disaster Risk Reduction in Australia Status Report 2020 ADPC Editorial Team Aslam Perwaiz Janne Parviainen Pannawadee Somboon Ariela Mcdonald UNDRR Review Team Animesh Kumar Andrew Mcelroy Omar Amach Cover photo: anakkml/ Freepik.com Layout and design: Lakkhana Tasaka About this report The disaster risk reduction (DRR) status report provides a snapshot of the state of DRR in Australia under the four priorities of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030. It also highlights progress and challenges associated with ensuring coherence among the key global frameworks at the national level; and makes recommendations for strengthening overall disaster risk management (DRM) governance by government institutions and stakeholders at national and local levels. As this report is based on information available as of the end of the year 2019, an update on the COVID-19 impact, response and recovery using a risk-informed approach by countries is provided at the beginning of this report. This report has been prepared by the Asian Disaster Preparedness Center (ADPC) on behalf of the United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR) through country consultations and a desk review of key documents, including legal instruments and DRR policies, plans, strategies and frameworks, etc. UNDRR and ADPC acknowledges the government, international organizations and stakeholder representatives who contributed their valuable input and feedback on this report. This report was made possible by a generous contribution made by the Government of Australia, Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, as part of the Partnership Framework with UNDRR on ‘Supporting Implementation of the Sendai Framework.’ This report serves as a reference document for the implementation and monitoring of the Sendai Framework.
  • Preliminary Report on Methodology Options for the 2016 Census.Pdf

    Preliminary Report on Methodology Options for the 2016 Census.Pdf

    Preliminary Report on Methodology Options for the 2016 Census Prepared by Don Royce for the 2016 Census Strategy Census Management Office Released date: 2011-09-30 Final version The conclusions and opinions expressed in this paper are those of the author, and do not necessarily reflect those of Statistics Canada. Table of contents Page Executive summary .................................................................................................................................... 3 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 5 2. Overview of the study ............................................................................................................................ 6 3. Census-taking approaches ................................................................................................................... 9 3.1 Traditional census ............................................................................................................................. 9 3.1.1 Description ............................................................................................................................. 9 3.1.2 Necessary conditions ........................................................................................................... 10 3.1.3 Strengths .............................................................................................................................. 10 3.1.4 Weaknesses ........................................................................................................................
  • PISA 2015: Financial Literacy in Australia

    PISA 2015: Financial Literacy in Australia

    PISA 2015: Financial literacy in Australia Sue Thomson Lisa De Bortoli Australian Council for Educational Research First published 2017 by Australian Council for Educational Research Ltd 19 Prospect Hill Road, Camberwell, Victoria, 3124, Australia www.acer.org www.acer.org/ozpisa/reports/ Text © Australian Council for Educational Research Ltd 2017 Design and typography © ACER Creative Services 2017 This book is copyright. All rights reserved. Except under the conditions described in the Copyright Act 1968 of Australia and subsequent amendments, and any exceptions permitted under the current statutory licence scheme administered by Copyright Agency (www.copyright.com.au), no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, transmitted, broadcast or communication in any form or by any means, optical, digital, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the written permission of the publisher. Cover design, text design and typesetting by ACER Creative Services Edited by Kylie Cockle National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Creator: Thomson, Sue, 1958- author. Title: PISA 2015 : financial literacy in Australia / Sue Thomson (author); Lisa De Bortoli (author). ISBN: 9781742864785 (ebook) Subjects: Programme for International Student Assessment. Educational evaluation--Australia--Statistics. Students, Foreign--Rating of--Australia--Statistics. Young adults--Education--Australia--Statistics. Financial literacy--Australia--Statistics. Other Creators/Contributors: De Bortoli,
  • The Australian Democrats Andrew Bartlett*

    The Australian Democrats Andrew Bartlett*

    Australian Cultural History Vol. 27, No.2, October 2009, 187-193 The Australian Democrats Andrew Bartlett* The Australian Democrats had maintained a presence in the Senate since 1977, but the 2007 election threatened to end their representation for good. Their efforts to retain seats proved to be in vain. Keywords: 2007 election; Australian Democrats; Senate Following on from the 2004 election, where the Australian Democrats lost four seats (including the Democrat seat Meg Lees had taken with her when she resigned from the party in 2002), plus official parliamentary status and balance of power in the Senate, the Party faced a very difficult task in the 2007 election trying to keep its four remaining Senate seats. Right throughout John Howard's fourth term, opinion polls showed public support for the Democrats consistently scraping along rock bottom levels of 1 or 2 per cent, as they had ever since the Lees resignation and the related public implosion of Natasha Stott Despoja's leadership in 2002. Even though the removal of the Democrats from the balance of power after the 2004 poll led directly to the Coalition government gaining control of the Senate, where it frequently used its majority to stifle scrutiny and bulldoze through some controversial legislation, the Democrats were unable to use this situation to build public support for returning the Party to its traditional Senate watchdog position. The Party had avoided going into debt in its 2004 campaign, so there were sufficient funds to run a basic campaign in priority areas for the 2007 election. However, serious use of paid advertising was not feasible.
  • Before I Call the Hon. Dr Peter Phelps, I Remind Honourable Members That He Is About to Make Is His Inaugural Speech

    Before I Call the Hon. Dr Peter Phelps, I Remind Honourable Members That He Is About to Make Is His Inaugural Speech

    GOVERNOR'S SPEECH: ADDRESS-IN-REPLY The PRESIDENT: Order! Before I call the Hon. Dr Peter Phelps, I remind honourable members that he is about to make is his inaugural speech. I invite all members to extend to him the traditional courtesies that are extended to a new member on such an occasion. The Hon. Dr PETER PHELPS [2.40 p.m.] (Inaugural Speech): I second the motion for adoption of the address in reply to the Governor's opening Speech. Mr President, may I first congratulate you on your election. It is a most deserved honour and my joy is tempered only by your refusal to don full regalia. Let me state also that I am delighted to be in this place. For many years now it is all that I have wanted to be. It was this place that in 1984 launched my political career. It was a Wednesday—it must have been a Wednesday, because that was the sports day and the Fort Street High School under 16 Rugby team had a bye. Being mildly interested in politics, I hopped on the bus and went into town to see Parliament for the first time. I was so appalled by what I saw that when I left this place I walked down Bridge Street to Anchor House, met a nice lady called Mrs Macauley, got out my wallet and joined the Liberal Party on the spot. However, I did find it strange that Mrs Mac put me into a branch nowhere near where I lived. I was to discover only in later years the significance of such occurrences.
  • Northern Territory Election 19 August 2020

    Northern Territory Election 19 August 2020

    Barton Deakin Brief: Northern Territory Election 19 August 2020 Overview The Northern Territory election is scheduled to be held on Saturday 22 August 2020. This election will see the incumbent Labor Party Government led by Michael Gunner seeking to win a second term against the Country Liberal Party Opposition, which lost at the 2016 election. Nearly 40 per cent of Territorians have already cast their vote in pre-polling ahead of the ballot. The ABC’s election analyst Antony Green said that a swing of 3 per cent would deprive the Government of its majority. However, it is not possible to calculate how large the swing against the Government would need to be to prevent a minority government. This Barton Deakin brief provides a snapshot of what to watch in this Territory election on Saturday. Current composition of the Legislative Assembly The Territory has a single Chamber, the Legislative Assembly, which is composed of 25 members. Currently, the Labor Government holds 16 seats (64 per cent), the Country Liberal Party Opposition holds two seats (8 per cent), the Territory Alliance holds three seats (12 per cent), and there are four independents (16 per cent). In late 2018, three members of the Parliamentary Labor Party were dismissed for publicly criticising the Government’s economic management after a report finding that the budget was in “structural deficit”. Former Aboriginal Affairs Minister Ken Vowles, Jeff Collins, and Scott McConnell were dismissed. Mr Vowles later resigned from Parliament and was replaced at a by-election in February 2020 by former Richmond footballer Joel Bowden (Australian Labor Party).
  • Second Morrison Government Ministry 29 June 2021 Overview

    Second Morrison Government Ministry 29 June 2021 Overview

    Barton Deakin Brief: Second Morrison Government Ministry 29 June 2021 Overview Prime Minister Scott Morrison MP has announced his new Cabinet and Ministry following the change in The Nationals leadership. Cabinet Changes - Barnaby Joyce MP is the new Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Infrastructure, Transport and Regional Development. Michael McCormack MP has been removed from the Cabinet and is now on the backbench. - David Littleproud MP retains his position as the Minster for Agriculture and is now also the Minister for Northern Australia. The role of Minister for Drought and Emergency Management will be given to Senator Bridget McKenzie. - Senator McKenzie will be returned to the Cabinet and is also the new Minister for Regionalisation, Regional Communications and Regional Education. - Keith Pitt MP, the Minister for Resources and Water will move to the outer Ministry, with his Northern Australia portfolio goes to David Littleproud MP. - Andrew Gee MP has been promoted to the Cabinet as the Minister for Defence Industry and Minister for Veterans’ Affairs. - Darren Chester MP, the former Minister for Veterans Affairs and Defence Personnel has been removed from the Cabinet and the Ministry. Ministry Changes - Mark Coulton MP, formerly the Minister for Regional Health, Regional Communications and Local Government is no longer a Minister. - Dr David Gillespie MP has become the Minister for Regional Health. For more information - The Ministry List from the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet For more information, contact David Alexander on +61 457 400 524, Grahame Morris on +61 411 222 680, Cheryl Cartwright on +61 419 996 066 or Jack de Hennin on +61 424 828 127.
  • The Most Vitriolic Parliament

    The Most Vitriolic Parliament

    THE MOST VITRIOLIC PARLIAMENT EVIDENCE OF THE VITRIOLIC NATURE OF THE 43 RD PARLIAMENT AND POTENTIAL CAUSES Nicolas Adams, 321 382 For Master of Arts (Research), June 2016 The University of Melbourne, School of Social and Political Sciences Supervisors: Prof. John Murphy, Dr. Scott Brenton i Abstract It has been suggested that the period of the Gillard government was the most vitriolic in recent political history. This impression has been formed by many commentators and actors, however very little quantitative data exists which either confirms or disproves this theory. Utilising an analysis of standing orders within the House of Representatives it was found that a relatively fair case can be made that the 43rd parliament was more vitriolic than any in the preceding two decades. This period in the data, however, was trumped by the first year of the Abbott government. Along with this conclusion the data showed that the cause of the vitriol during this period could not be narrowed to one specific driver. It can be seen that issues such as the minority government, style of opposition, gender and even to a certain extent the speakership would have all contributed to any mutation of the tone of debate. ii Declaration I declare that this thesis contains only my original work towards my Masters of Arts (Research) except where due acknowledgement has been made in the text to other material used. Equally this thesis is fewer than the maximum word limit as approved by the Research Higher Degrees Committee. iii Acknowledgements I wish to acknowledge my two supervisors, Prof.
  • Reclink Annual Report 2017-18

    Reclink Annual Report 2017-18

    , Annual Report 2017-18 Partners Our Mission Respond. Rebuild. Reconnect. We seek to give all participants the power of purpose. About Reclink Australia Reclink Australia is a not-for-profit organisation whose aim is to enhance the lives of people experiencing disadvantage or facing significant barriers to participation, through providing new and unique sports, specialist recreation and arts programs, and pathways to employment opportunities. We target some of the community’s most vulnerable and isolated people; at risk youth, those experiencing mental illness, people with a disability, the homeless, people tackling alcohol and other drug issues and social and economic hardship. As part of our unique hub and spoke network model, Reclink Australia has facilitated cooperative partnerships with a membership of more than 290 community, government and private organisations. Our member agencies are committed to encouraging our target population group, under-represented in mainstream sport and recreational programs, to take that step towards improved health and self-esteem, and use Reclink Australia’s activities as a means of engagement for hard to reach population groups. Contents Our Mission 3 State Reports 11 About Reclink Australia 3 AAA Play 20 Why We Exist 4 Reclink India 22 What We Do 5 Art Therapy 23 Delivering Evidence-based Programs 6 Events, Fundraising and Volunteers 24 Transformational Links, Training Our Activities 32 and Education 7 Our Members 34 Corporate Governance 7 Gratitude 36 Founder’s Message 8 Our National Footprint 38 Improving Lives and Reducing Crime 9 Reclink Australia Staff 39 Community Partners 10 Contact Us 39 Notice of 2017 Annual General Meeting The Annual General Meeting for Members 1.
  • Mps in Drive for Nuclear Energy - the Australian, 2/18/2021

    Mps in Drive for Nuclear Energy - the Australian, 2/18/2021

    18/02/2021 MPs in drive for nuclear energy - The Australian, 2/18/2021 MPs in drive for nuclear energy EXCLUSIVE GREG BROWN COALITION’S CLIMATE PUSH Nationals senators have drafted legislation allowing the Clean Energy Finance Corporation to invest in nuclear power as twothirds of Coalition MPs backed lifting the ban on the controversial fuel source to help shift the nation to a carbon- neutral future. The block of five Nationals senators, led by Bridget McKenzie and Matt Canavan, will move an amendment to legislation establishing a $1bn arm at the green bank to allow it to invest in nuclear generators, high-energy, low-emissions (HELE), coal- fired power stations and carbon capture and storage technology. The Nationals’ move comes as a survey of 71 Coalition backbenchers conducted by The Australian revealed that 48 were in favour of lifting the longstanding prohibition on nuclear power in the EPBC act. Liberal MPs Andrew Laming, John Alexander and Gerard Rennick are among backbenchers who want Scott Morrison to take a repeal of the nuclear ban to the upcoming election — a move that would open a new divide with Labor as the nation sets a course for a low-emissions future. “I’m very keen to see the prohibition lifted,” Mr Laming said. “It is something that has to be taken to an election so Australians realise there is a significant change in energy policy.” Mr Alexander said it was like “trying to fight Muhammad Ali with one arm tied behind your back if you are going to ignore nuclear energy”. “This is a new era; let’s be right at the cutting edge,” Mr Alexander said.