DOCSLIB.ORG

Excerpt from 'Waterloo' by Bernard Cornwell, Chapter 4, About the 16

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Excerpt from 'Waterloo' by Bernard Cornwell, Chapter 4, About the 16 Waterloo Uncovered – Reading to Remember 2017 Text kindly provided by Bernard Cornwell. Excerpt from ‘Waterloo’ by Bernard Cornwell, chapter 4, about the 16 June battle at Quatre-Bras Skirmishers play a large part in the story of Waterloo. Essentially they are specialist infantrymen who fight neither in line, nor in column (though they could and often did do both), but fought ahead of a line or column. They formed a skirmish line, a scatter of troops spread wide, whose job was to snipe at the enemy’s formation. Every battalion possessed a Light Company, and some whole battalions were light troops like the battalions of the 95th Rifles. The French had expanded the numbers of their skirmishers because, like the artillery, they were useful for weakening an enemy line before the column attacked. The best defence against skirmishers was other skirmishers, so in battle both sides had their light troops in extended order way ahead of their formations. Their scattered formation made them difficult targets for inaccurate muskets and not worth the price of a cannon ball, though they were vulnerable to canister, an artillery round which turned the cannon into a giant shotgun. They fought in pairs, one man firing while his companion loaded. In an ideal world the French skirmishers, who were called voltigeurs or tirailleurs, would go ahead until they were in musket range of the enemy line and then they would open fire, hoping to bring down officers. Tirailleur, the official name, simply means a shooter, from the verb tir, to shoot, while a voltigeur is a vaulter, or gymnast, because the ideal skirmisher was an agile, quick-moving man. They knelt or lay down to fire, making themselves small targets, and enough skirmishers could seriously hurt a line of troops, but only if they could get close. French skirmishers usually outnumbered the British, though the British had the advantage that many of their skirmishers were armed with rifles, a weapon that Napoleon refused to employ. The rifle’s drawback was that it was slow to load because the bullet, usually wrapped in a leather patch, had to be forced down the rifled barrel, and that took far longer than ramming a musket ball down a smoothbore barrel, but the advantage of the rifle was its accuracy. The British used the Baker Rifle, a superb and dependable weapon, that was accurate far beyond the range of any musket. Skirmishers dared not get too far ahead of their parent battalions because, in the deadly game of scissors, stone and paper which characterizes artillery, infantry and cavalry in the Napoleonic era, they were totally vulnerable to horsemen. Their scattered formation meant they could not form square or offer volley fire, so a few cavalrymen could decimate a skirmish line in a matter of seconds. But when Picton’s Division arrives at Quatre Bras there is no cavalry to scour the French skirmishers away. The Black Legion of Brunswick reached the battlefield at the same time as Picton’s men, but the rest of the Duke’s cavalry regiments are still hurrying to reach the battlefield and so Wellington decides to attack the French skirmishers with his line of infantry. There were columns of French infantry beyond the enemy skirmishers, but British lines had never had trouble defeating French columns and so the six battalions were ordered forward. They were severely outnumbered. The French were coming in three columns, the largest with over 8,000 men was attacking northwards close to the Bossu wood. The central column, advancing along the highway, had 5,400 men while to their right were another 4,200 infantry, all of them supported by over fifty cannon and by troops of cavalry. The six battalions of British infantry had around 3,500 men between them who had to face at least 1 Waterloo Uncovered – Reading to Remember 2017 Text kindly provided by Bernard Cornwell. 17,000 infantry, as well as the artillery and cavalry, but these battalions were among the best and most experienced in Wellington’s army. What followed was typical of the day’s confused fighting. One of those battalions was the kilted Highlanders, just over 500 men of the 42nd, the Black Watch. James Anton was a sergeant in the battalion that first had to advance through the field of rye where the Dutch skirmishers were being overwhelmed by the heavy French attack. The stalks of the rye, like some reeds that grow on the margins of some swamp, opposed our advance; the tops were up to our bonnets, and we strode and groped our way through as fast as we could. By the time we reached the field of clover on the other side we were very much straggled; however, we united in line as fast as time and our speedy advance would permit. The Belgic skirmishers retired through our ranks, and in an instant we were on their victorious pursuers. Our sudden appearance seemed to paralyse their advance. The singular appearance of our dress, combined no doubt with our sudden début, tended to stagger their resolution: we were on them, our pieces were loaded, and our bayonets glittered, eager to drink their blood. Those who had so proudly driven the Belgians before them turned now to fly . we drove on so fast that we almost appeared like a mob (and) Marshal Ney, who commanded the enemy, observed our wild unguarded zeal and ordered a regiment of lancers to bear down upon us. (We) took them for Brunswickers. The Black Watch was now in an open field and still in line. There was cavalry on their flank, but they assumed they were the Brunswick horsemen who had arrived at Quatre Bras about the same time as the 42nd. Brunswick was a German state which had fallen to the French and in revenge the Duke of Brunswick had raised a regiment which had joined Wellington in Spain. They wore black uniforms and were known as the Black Legion, and were led at Quatre Bras by their young Duke, Friedrich Wilhelm. The Brunswickers, though they had been allies of the British in Spain, were not popular, mainly because of their taste for dogmeat. The Irish Rifleman, Private Edward Costello of the green-jacketed 95th Rifles, remembered a dog called Rifle who had accompanied his battalion in Spain; A dog which had attached itself to our regiment and which could never be induced to leave us. We lost him on one or two occasions, but he always managed to rejoin us. We used to joke among ourselves at Rifle’s antipathy to a red coat, for he had a decided preference for green. The poor fellow survived many of our skirmishes, in which he used to run about barking and expressing his delight as much as a dog could. Then one day Rifle vanished altogether, and it was discovered that he had been eaten by the Black Legion. Legend insists that the Rifles got their revenge by slicing the buttocks from some dead Frenchmen, smoking them and then selling them as hams to the Brunswickers. 2 Waterloo Uncovered – Reading to Remember 2017 Text kindly provided by Bernard Cornwell. --------CHANGE READERS--------- Sergeant James Anton and the 42nd Highlanders were still advancing in line across the open field of clover, ignorant that the cavalry to their right were not dog-eating Germans, but Frenchmen. Then a German staff officer galloped past the battalion shouting that the approaching cavalry were ‘Franchee! Franchee!’ The horsemen were lancers. We instantly formed a rallying square; no time for particularity; every man’s piece was loaded, and our enemies approached at full charge; the feet of their horses seemed to tear up the ground. This was desperate work. A battalion in line was fearfully vulnerable to a cavalry charge, but an infantry square could defeat almost any attack by horsemen. Yet it took time to make a square and the Highlanders had no time and so the order was shouted to rally. This was almost a panic. Instead of the careful ordering of the companies into a rectangle bristling with bayonets, the 42nd simply ran towards the colours and formed a huddle with the men facing outwards. Some lancers were even trapped inside the hastily forming rally- square and were dragged from their horses and killed. The skirmishers, who were deployed ahead of the battalion, stood no chance and were ridden down by the lancers, as was the battalion commander, Sir Robert Macara. Sir Robert’s death was witnessed by the 42nd and it enraged them. He had been wounded earlier and, just before the lancers appeared, was being stretchered to the rear in search of a surgeon. The stretcher was either two jackets with their sleeves threaded over a pair of muskets or, more likely, a blanket held by the four men carrying him. The French saw the wounded man’s medals and braid and, presumably in search of plunder, callously slaughtered all five men. That was murder, not warfare, and it enraged the Scots. They drove off the lancers with musketry, but later in the day the officers of the 42nd had to restrain their men who were slaughtering surrendering Frenchmen with shouts of ‘Where’s Macara?’ Captain Archibald Menzies, who commanded the Grenadier Company of the 42nd, was also trapped outside the rally square. He was a man of legendary strength who, preferring to fight on foot, had handed off his horse to a drummer boy. Menzies (pronounced Mingis) was wounded and fell next to Private Donald Mackintosh. The drummer boy abandoned the horse and ran to help, upon which a lancer tried to seize the valuable animal.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • THE BRITISH ARMY in the LOW COUNTRIES, 1793-1814 By
    ‘FAIRLY OUT-GENERALLED AND DISGRACEFULLY BEATEN’: THE BRITISH ARMY IN THE LOW COUNTRIES, 1793-1814 by ANDREW ROBERT LIMM A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY. University of Birmingham School of History and Cultures College of Arts and Law October, 2014. University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT The history of the British Army in the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars is generally associated with stories of British military victory and the campaigns of the Duke of Wellington. An intrinsic aspect of the historiography is the argument that, following British defeat in the Low Countries in 1795, the Army was transformed by the military reforms of His Royal Highness, Frederick Duke of York. This thesis provides a critical appraisal of the reform process with reference to the organisation, structure, ethos and learning capabilities of the British Army and evaluates the impact of the reforms upon British military performance in the Low Countries, in the period 1793 to 1814, via a series of narrative reconstructions. This thesis directly challenges the transformation argument and provides a re-evaluation of British military competency in the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars.
    [Show full text]
  • {DOWNLOAD} Sharpes Skirmish: Richard Sharpe and the Defence
    SHARPES SKIRMISH: RICHARD SHARPE AND THE DEFENCE OF THE TORMES, AUGUST 1812 PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Bernard Cornwell | 64 pages | 03 Sep 2002 | The Sharpe Appreciation Society | 9780972222006 | English | Nottingham, United Kingdom Bernard Cornwellwhere do I start? | Originally published in Blackwood's magazine. Partially in Spain including the battles of Cuidad Rodrigo and Badajoz. Editions Londdon: S. Brereton, Captn. Brereton was a prolific author of fiction for boys, modeled after G. Brew, Margaret W. Campbell, Dr. Campbell, K. Capes, B. A Castle in Spain : being certain memoirs, thus entitled, of Robin Lois, ex-major of His Majesty's th regiment of foot Capes was a prolific late Victorian author; lately some of his ghost stories have been reprinted. Editions London: Smith, Elder. Martin's Press. Connell, F. Cornwell, Bernard Sharpe's Enemy. Amazon New York: Penguin Books. Cornwell, Bernard Sharpe's company. Cornwell, Bernard Sharpe's eagle. Cornwell, Bernard Sharpe's gold. Cornwell, Bernard Sharpe's havoc. Cornwell, Bernard Sharpe's honor. New York: Penguin Books. Cornwell, Bernard Sharpe's revenge. Cornwell, Bernard Sharpe's rifles. Cornwell, Bernard Sharpe's siege. Cornwell, Bernard Sharpe's skirmish. Revised and extended edition. Cornwell, Bernard Sharpe's sword. Crockett, S. It is included because the book is included in a short listing of fiction of the Peninsular War at Manchester Polytechnic Library. The book itself has very slight reference to the Peninsular War, but is of that time period. Editions London: Ward Lock. Dallas Alexander R. Felix Alvarez, or, Manners in Spain Containing descriptive accounts of some of the prominent events of the late Peninsular War; and authentic anecdotes illustrative of the Spanish character; interspersed with poetry, original and from the Spanish - from the title page.
    [Show full text]
  • Fm 3-21.5 (Fm 22-5)
    FM 3-21.5 (FM 22-5) HEADQUARTERS DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY JULY 2003 DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. *FM 3-21.5(FM 22-5) FIELD MANUAL HEADQUARTERS No. 3-21.5 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY WASHINGTON, DC, 7 July 2003 DRILL AND CEREMONIES CONTENTS Page PREFACE........................................................................................................................ vii Part One. DRILL CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 1-1. History................................................................................... 1-1 1-2. Military Music....................................................................... 1-2 CHAPTER 2. DRILL INSTRUCTIONS Section I. Instructional Methods ........................................................................ 2-1 2-1. Explanation............................................................................ 2-1 2-2. Demonstration........................................................................ 2-2 2-3. Practice................................................................................... 2-6 Section II. Instructional Techniques.................................................................... 2-6 2-4. Formations ............................................................................. 2-6 2-5. Instructors.............................................................................. 2-8 2-6. Cadence Counting.................................................................. 2-8 CHAPTER 3. COMMANDS AND THE COMMAND VOICE Section I. Commands ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • MOUNTED RIFLEMAN COUNSELING GUIDE Message from the 74Th Regimental Commander to Leaders of the 3D Cavalry
    MOUNTED RIFLEMAN COUNSELING GUIDE Message from the 74th Regimental Commander to Leaders of the 3d Cavalry Many leaders will receive this guide and ask why it is necessary. They will say, “I don’t need a guide to know my Troopers. I do that already.” What we are seeing in the Regiment is that our current standard for “knowing our Troopers” is too low. This fact has become evident in the wake of several serious incidents, where “post-blast investigation” revealed facts about the Trooper that several echelons of leaders should have known. For instance, it is unacceptable for a leader not to know that a Trooper has separated from his wife and for months has continued to live off post. It is also unacceptable for a leader not to know if a Trooper pays child support or has designated someone other than his spouse to receive death benefits/SGLI. Conversely, I expect our leaders to know their Troopers’ personal goals and map out a plan to meet them. As much as we think we are practicing engaged leadership, and although we can never mitigate risk to zero…we can always improve. Using this guide, I expect 3d Cavalry Regiment leaders to achieve the following guidance: Leaders will prioritize engaged leadership through daily interactions and formal counseling, and do so at the expense of METL training, when necessary. Leaders will actively gather critical information from personnel documents and associated agencies to “connect the dots” of their Troopers’ lives. This effort is decisive in identifying risk and setting conditions for that Trooper’s success.
    [Show full text]
  • NAPOLEON's INVASION of RUSSIA ) "SPECIAL CAMPAIGN" SERIES with NUMEROUS MAPS and PLANS
    a? s •X& m pjasitvcixxTA • &w* ^fffj President White Library , Cornell University Cornell University Library DC 235.B97 Napolean's invasion of Russia 3 1924 024 323 382 The original of this book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924024323382 SPECIAL CAMPAIGN SERIES. No. 19 NAPOLEON'S INVASION OF RUSSIA ) "SPECIAL CAMPAIGN" SERIES With NUMEROUS MAPS and PLANS. Crown 8vo. Cloth. SI- net each (1) FROM SAARBRUCK TO PARIS (Franco-German War, 1870) By Lieut-Colonel SISSON PRATT, late R.A. (2) THE RUSSO-TURKISH WAR, 1877 By Major F. MAURICE, p.s.c. (3) FREDERICKSBURG CAMPAIGN, 1862 By Major Q. W. REDWAY (4) THE CAMPAIGN OF MAGENTA AND SOLFERINO, 1859 By Colonel HAROLD WYLLY, C.B. (5) THE WATERLOO CAMPAIGN By Lieut-Colonel SISSON PRATT, late R.A. (6) THE CAMPAIGN IN BOHEMIA, 1866 By Lieut-Colonel GLUNICKE (7) THE LEIPZIG CAMPAIGN, 1813 By Colonel F. N. MAUDE, C.B. (8) GRANT'S CAMPAIGN IN VIRGINIA (The Wilderness Campaign) By Captain VAUGHAN-SAWYER (9) THE JENA CAMPAIGN, 1806 By Colonel F. N. MAUDE, C.B. (10) THE RUSSO-JAPANESE WAR. Part I By Captain F. R. SEDGWICK (11) THE WAR OF SECESSION, 1861=2 (Bull Run to Malvern Hill By Major G. W. REDWAY (12) THE ULM CAMPAIGN, 1805 By Colonel F. N. MAUDE, C.B. (13) CHANCELLORSVILLE AND GETTYSBURG, 1863 By Colonel P. H. DALBIAC, C.B. (14) THE WAR OF SECESSION, 1863 (Cedar Run. Manassas and Sharpsburg)' By E.
    [Show full text]
  • Brigade Squares
    Brigade Squares When an infantry unit chooses to enter the Prepared State, it may choose to enter the normal prepared state (Blucher pg 34-35) or to enter a formation called the “Brigade Square”. This represents the unit in question forming a traditional infantry square in order to repel Cavalry. The normal Prepared State in Blucher assumes that the unit in question is no longer moving and has dug in to the terrain somewhat. This is not representative of the way open-field squares functioned, and so the Brigade Square is added as a sub-state of the Prepared State. To enter Brigade Square, a unit cannot move during the turn it assumes Brigade Square. As with the normal Prepared State, the action of assuming Brigade Square does not prevent it from shooting during that turn. A unit in the Brigade Square state has the following characteristics: -The unit remains in Brigade Square until the active player takes a full turn to return it to a normal state. The unit may fire during the turn it reforms, but may not move (this also means that a unit in Brigade Square cannot declare a charge). The active player may choose the unit’s new facing when it reforms. -It gains a 360-degree firing arc, but loses 1 die from all shooting attacks (to a minimum of 1). -It may move up to 1 inch per turn. This is a special movement rate separate from the Simple or Difficult Move. A Brigade Square may not enter, form in, or move through, and sort of Difficult or Urban terrain (unless on a Road).
    [Show full text]
  • CCN Additions
    Supplemental Rules NEW GAME MECHANICS Garrison Markers An Infantry unit with two or more blocks that occupies any building, walled garden or walled farm hex at the start of the turn, and is ordered to move out of that hex, may leave a Garrison in the hex. One infantry block is taken from the pool of blocks not deployed in the scenario, and is placed on the building hex along with a Garrison marker showing the proper side face up, either French or Coalition. The departing Infantry unit does not lose a block in order to create the Garrison. A qualifying Infantry unit may form multiple Garrisons during the course of a scenario. A Garrison block is treated like an Infantry unit for all game purposes with the following exceptions: • A Garrison block may not move. • A Garrison block will battle with 1 die. Command and Tactician cards, however, can modify its battle dice. • A Garrison block does not receive any National modifiers. • A Garrison block is eliminated if forced to retreat. • A Garrison block, when eliminated, does not count as a Victory Banner. • A friendly unit may enter a Garrison hex. When the unit enters, the Garrison marker and Infantry block are removed. The entering unit does not gain a block when the Garrison is removed. NOTE: Additional rules clarifications from Richard Borg, May - 29 - 2015: • A Garrison marker can not move, but it needs a corresponding command card order to battle • Basic terrain rules do apply (in- and outside) to determine the number of battledice, when a Garrison block is battling and when a Garrison block is being attacked • A Garrison marker is hit on range with INF and FLG symbol and in melee additionally with the XSW symbol.
    [Show full text]
  • The American Rifleman in the Revolutionary War
    HISTORYHISTORY — STRUGGLE FOR FREEDOM The American Rifleman in the Revolutionary War American frontiersmen were practically raised from birth The buckskin-clad American riflemen of Morgan’s Rifle Corps rush into position to with rifle in hand, and their marksmanship prowess thwart the British advance at the Second Battle of Saratoga. Timothy Murphy is de picted repeatedly interfered with British and Indian threats. gesturing toward British Brig. Gen. Simon Fraser in the distance. by Roger D. McGrath an armed citizenry was essential to the preservation of freedom. Once disarmed, crack shots, whom the family depended “When the resolution of enslaving Amer- a people either submit meekly to tyrants upon to hunt game for food and to beat ica was formed in Great Britain, the Brit- or fight in vain. The American Revolution back Indian attacks. ish Parliament was advised by an artful strongly reinforced the historical perspec- The Kentucky rifle was a finely crafted man, who was governor of Pennsylvania, tive of the Founding Fathers: The armed tool that no family on the frontier was to disarm the people; that it was the best American colonists defeated the mighty without. The rifle was not made in Ken- and most effectual way to enslave them; British Empire. tucky, as its name would suggest, but in but that they should not do it openly, but While the British had to quickly train Pennsylvania. The towns of Lancaster and weaken them, and let them sink gradually.” their troops in the use of firearms, the Reading were particularly important cen- — George Mason of Virginia, 1788 American rebels could rely on men who ters of production.
    [Show full text]
  • A Consideration of the Adequacy of British Military Tactics During the Battles of the Anglo Zulu War
    A consideration of the adequacy of British military tactics during the battles of the Anglo Zulu War. Mark Maplesden ________________________________________________________________________ For the purposes of this essay British military tactics have been defined as those strategies devised to fulfil the military objectives of the invasion force of Zululand. To ‘describe the adequacy’ of these military tactics it has been necessary to determine whether the strategies employed were sufficient to fulfil the identified objectives and, if so, were they successful. During the evaluation of military tactics the term ‘battles’ has not been limited to individual engagements but interpreted to encompass the invasion strategy and the specific tactics, which dictated the conduct of combatants on the march and in battle. It has been assumed that ‘The Anglo Zulu War’ is to include both invasions of Zululand although the examination of tactics has not extended beyond the British victory at Ulundi and the subsequent departure of Lord Chelmsford. Other than identifying commanding officer, no attempt has been made to access the capabilities of each in employing the tactics identified. Whilst recognizing that logistical difficulties impacted upon military strategy, no in-depth analysis has been included in the scope of this essay. The political agenda of the British High Commissioner and Governor of the Cape, Sir Henry Bartle Frere, and the economic objectives of Sir Theophilus Shepstone, British Administrator of the Transvaal, had ensured that confrontation with the independent Zulu nation was inevitable. The objective was total subjugation of Zululand. For any conflict with King Cetshwayo’s people the formulation of British military tactics would be the direct responsibility of the Commander in Chief of British forces in southern Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Wellington's Two-Front War: the Peninsular Campaigns, 1808-1814 Joshua L
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2005 Wellington's Two-Front War: The Peninsular Campaigns, 1808-1814 Joshua L. Moon Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES WELLINGTON’S TWO-FRONT WAR: THE PENINSULAR CAMPAIGNS, 1808 - 1814 By JOSHUA L. MOON A Dissertation submitted to the Department of History In partial fulfillment of the Requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Degree Awarded Spring Semester, 2005 The members of the Committee approve the Dissertation of Joshua L. Moon defended on 7 April 2005. __________________________________ Donald D. Horward Professor Directing Dissertation ____________________________________ Patrick O’Sullivan Outside Committee Member _____________________________ Jonathan Grant Committee Member ______________________________ Edward Wynot Committee Member ______________________________ Joe M. Richardson Committee Member The Office of Graduate Studies has verified and approved the above named Committee members ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS No one can write a dissertation alone and I would like to thank a great many people who have made this possible. Foremost, I would like to acknowledge Dr. Donald D. Horward. Not only has he tirelessly directed my studies, but also throughout this process he has inculcated a love for Napoleonic History in me that will last a lifetime. A consummate scholar and teacher, his presence dominates the field. I am immensely proud to have his name on this work and I owe an immeasurable amount of gratitude to him and the Institute of Napoleon and French Revolution at Florida State University.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Speak
    Military Speak A glossary for Soldiers and Chiefs Soldiers have a language of their own. Some of these words and phrases are technical descriptions of aspects of the military life. Others are slang or metaphors that have found their way into everyday speech. You might be using military terms without even realising it! As you explore the displays in the Soldiers and Chiefs exhibition, you might find some unfamiliar terms. This information booklet provides definitions for a number of military words, grouped into these categories: • Kinds of Soldiers • Army Ranks • Army Weapons 1 Kinds of Soldiers This set of military terms for different kinds of soldiers will help you to become familiar with the terminology used in the exhibitions. Some of these terms are no longer used in today’s armies. Civilian a non-military person: a soldier’s life starts as a civilian Soldier a soldier serves in an army, wearing a uniform and carrying a weapon Infantry soldiers who are trained to fight on foot Civilianin the past, included such types as fusilier, grenadier and rifleman Cavalry soldiers who were trained to fight on horseback the common types of cavalry were hussar, lancer and dragoon Artilleryman a soldier with specialized training to operate artillery (cannons) a term used since the 16th century Rifleman an infantry soldier trained to use an accurate weapon (a rifle) and to operate in small groups to harass the enemy a term used since the 18th century Hussar Specialist Soldiers of the 18th and 19th Centuries Hussar (pronounced ‘who’s-are’) an elaborately
    [Show full text]
  • Infantry Square Formation for RFF Variants
    Playtest Version 3, 02/16/11 Infantry Square Formation for RFF Variants Infantry can reduce their risk from a cavalry charge by changing formation into a square. During the American Civil War, squares were rarely used because cavalry was more vulnerable to the increased firepower of troops armed with long range rifled muskets. Squares were more common in the earlier wars that can be played as Regimental Fire and Fury variants. A square is represented by arranging the unit’s stands in a hollow box, with stands distributed as evenly as possible on each side (see Figure 1). One side of the newly formed square must face in the same direction as the previous facing, with the center of that side overlapping the front and center of the old formation. A unit with an odd number of stands may place the extra stand on any side. A large unit with more than twelve stands must deploy its additional stands in a second rank placed inside the square and distributed as evenly as possible on each side. Only infantry may form square. Dismounted cavalry cannot form square. There are two methods of forming a square. The first is a deliberate square performed as a normal change of formation maneuver during the unit’s maneuver check. The second is a hasty square performed as a hasty maneuver in the opposing player turn immediately after charges are declared. Forming a Deliberate Square. A unit must receive a Well Handled effect in its maneuver check in order to change from any formation to a deliberate square, and it also may move half either before or after the change.
    [Show full text]