All for the King's Shilling

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

All for the King's Shilling ALL FOR THE KING’S SHILLING AN ANALYSIS OF THE CAMPAIGN AND COMBAT EXPERIENCES OF THE BRITISH SOLDIER IN THE PENINSULAR WAR, 1808-1814 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Edward James Coss, M.A. The Ohio State University 2005 Dissertation Committee: Approved by: Professor John Guilmartin, Adviser _______________________________ Professor Mark Grimsley Adviser Professor John Lynn Graduate Program in History Copyright by Edward J. Coss 2005 ABSTRACT The British soldier of the Peninsular War, 1808-1814, has in the last two centuries acquired a reputation as being a thief, scoundrel, criminal, and undesirable social outcast. Labeled “the scum of the earth” by their commander, the Duke of Wellington, these men were supposedly swept from the streets and jails into the army. Their unmatched success on the battlefield has been attributed to their savage and criminal natures and Wellington’s tactical ability. A detailed investigation, combining heretofore unmined demographic data, primary source accounts, and nutritional analysis, reveals a picture of the British soldier that presents his campaign and combat behaviors in a different light. Most likely an unemployed laborer or textile worker, the soldier enlisted because of economic need. A growing population, the impact of the war, and the transition from hand-made goods to machined products displaced large numbers of workers. Men joined the army in hopes of receiving regular wages and meals. In this they would be sorely disappointed. Enlisted for life, the soldier’s new primary social group became his surrogate family. The shared hardship of campaign and battle forged bonds of extraordinary strength between the British soldier and the men with whom he fought, lived, and suffered. When the commissariat failed to feed him, the soldier plundered out of desperation, sharing whatever could be found with his comrades. With little in the way of ii sustaining support on campaign, such as medals, chances for promotion, or the appreciation of the British public, the men looked to each other for esteem. Group mores, which put an emphasis on selfless acts that enhanced group survival, become the paramount driving force. Such group values applied on and off the battlefield; the ranker learned to lean on his group in order to face the physical and psychological demands of campaign and combat. No more a criminal than any other soldier of the Napoleonic wars, the British soldier was common in most every respect, except in his ability to adapt and survive under desperate circumstances. His victories in battle were the direct outcome of primary group cohesion and shared privation, not his base nature. iii Dedicated to David Chandler (1934-2004), friend, mentor, and consummate historian, and to Deb, Ben, and Brittany. They know why. iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am indebted to a number of exceptional people, each of whom has contributed significantly to this endeavor. Any spark of insight comes from the inspiration they collectively and selflessly provided. First and foremost, I would like to thank, profusely, John Guilmartin and John Rule, my long-time mentors; I don’t have the words to express what their continued support, guidance, and infectious love of history have meant to me. Every graduate student should be so lucky as to have two such fine scholars and gentlemen as academic guides. I would also offer my appreciation to John Lynn and Mark Grimsley for their advice and insight into military history. Having access to such first-rate intellects has been rewarding and epiphanal, not to mention down-right enjoyable. As for support, I have had the great fortune to rely on Faith Anne Myers. It is her mathematical, statistical, and editorial abilities, combined with her unfailing confidence in me and the ideas underlying this dissertation, that have made much of this work possible. In addition, Judy Duguid, Phil Fry, and Tim Pray have provided editorial assistance as well as advice on content and approach; like Faith Anne, they have done yeoman work on my behalf, all the while offering unconditional support. Such extraordinary friends are priceless. v I also believe that the encouragement of David Chandler, a long-time friend and an unmatched genius when it came to military history, made an important difference over the years. From the genesis of this work, over a decade ago, to its now completed state, I have shared my ideas with him. When his health deteriorated, we exchanged letters and cards. I wrote this dissertation as if David were in the room reading over my shoulder. A special thanks goes to Joby Abernathy. Without her care, advice, and efforts on my behalf, I never would have survived the harrowing waters of graduate school bureaucracy. Like an angel, she watched over me and guided me out of harm’s way. Finally, this work would never have germinated beyond simple musings without the support and understanding of my wife Debra, and my two children, Ben and Brittany. My wife has traveled with me abroad and assisted me in gathering research, from the Public Records Office in London to Invalides in Paris. She also helped compile the demographic research contained herein. She has listened, bemused and tolerant, as I shared each aspect of my discoveries. Brittany was also pressed into service inputting data, much to her regret. Both she and Ben have put up with my seemingly endless streams of historical anecdotes and insights with an amazing degree of forbearance. The impact of my enthusiasm has not gone unnoticed: Ben has chosen architecture and Brittany medicine as their areas of academic interest. History was never in the running. Deb, Ben, and Britt have somehow understood my passion for military history and my need to comprehend and analyze the behavior of men in battle. They have put up with my absences, my need for solitude, and my piles of research notes and books without complaint. They have been my sustaining motivation throughout. My gratitude to all these people knows no bounds. vi VITA January 25, 1954 ...................................................................................Born - Toledo, Ohio 1976....................................................................................................Bachelor of Education University of Toledo Toledo, Ohio 1984................................................................................................................ Master of Arts History The Ohio State University Columbus, Ohio PUBLICATIONS “The Great War, Spanish Flu, and Memory,” Focus Magazine, 12.34 (2004). “The British Soldier in the Peninsular War: The Acquisition of an Unjust Reputation,” Journal of the Western Society for French History, 18, 1991. Presented at the annual meeting of the Western Society for French History, Santa Barbara, California, 1991. “The British Soldier Against Napoleon: A New Appraisal,” Journal of the Napoleonic Society of America, 30, Clearwater, 1990. Presented at the Historical Conference on the Iberian Peninsula, held in Lisbon, Portugal, 1989 and the annual conference of the Napoleonic Society of America in Montreal, Canada, 1990. “Trial by Fire: The Combat Behavior of the British Soldier in the Peninsular War,” Proceedings of the Consortium on Revolutionary Europe. Tallahassee, 1989. Presented at the Consortium on Revolutionary Europe, the Bicentennial of the French Revolution, in Tallahassee, Florida, 1989. “The Misadventures of Wellington’s Cavalry, from the Peninsula to Waterloo,” Journal of the Waterloo Committee, X (April), London, 1988. Presented at the First Historical Congress on the Duke of Wellington, held in Southampton, England, 1987. vii FIELDS OF STUDY Major Field: History Area of Emphasis: Military History Minor Fields: History of Early Modern Europe History of Modern Europe viii TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract............................................................................................................................... ii Dedication.......................................................................................................................... iv Acknowledgments................................................................................................................v Vita..................................................................................................................................... vi List of Tables .......................................................................................................................x List of Figures.................................................................................................................. xiv Chapters: 1. Introduction......................................................................................................................1 2. Manufacturing the Myth of the Scum of the Earth........................................................46 3. Gone for a Soldier: The Realities of Enlistment............................................................72 4. Over the Hills and Far Away: Surviving on Campaign...............................................137 5. Ordeal by Fire: The British Soldier in Combat............................................................234 6. Into Hell before Daylight: Peninsular War Sieges.......................................................299 7. Conclusion ...................................................................................................................326
Recommended publications
  • The London Times Perspective on Napoleon Bonaparte's Invasion
    East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Electronic Theses and Dissertations Student Works 8-2012 “We Have to Record the Downfall of Tyranny”: The London imesT Perspective on Napoleon Bonaparte’s Invasion of Russia Julia Dittrich East Tennessee State University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/etd Part of the European History Commons, and the Journalism Studies Commons Recommended Citation Dittrich, Julia, "“We Have to Record the Downfall of Tyranny”: The London Times Perspective on Napoleon Bonaparte’s Invasion of Russia" (2012). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 1457. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/1457 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. “We Have to Record the Downfall of Tyranny”: The London Times Perspective on Napoleon Bonaparte’s Invasion of Russia _______________________ A thesis presented to the faculty of the Department of History East Tennessee State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in History _______________________ by Julia Dittrich August 2012 _______________________ Dr. Stephen G. Fritz, Chair Dr. Henry J. Antkiewicz Dr. Brian J. Maxson Keywords: Napoleon Bonaparte, The London Times, English Identity ABSTRACT “We Have to Record the Downfall of Tyranny”: The London Times Perspective on Napoleon Bonaparte’s Invasion of Russia by Julia Dittrich “We Have to Record the Downfall of Tyranny”: The London Times Perspective on Napoleon Bonaparte’s Invasion of Russia aims to illustrate how The London Times interpreted and reported on Napoleon’s 1812 invasion of Russia.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Armoured Division (1940)]
    7 September 2020 [1 ARMOURED DIVISION (1940)] st 1 Armoured Division (1) Headquarters, 1st Armoured Division 2nd Armoured Brigade (2) Headquarters, 2nd Armoured Brigade & Signal Section The Queen’s Bays (2nd Dragoon Guards) 9th Queen’s Royal Lancers 10th Royal Hussars (Prince of Wales’s Own) 3rd Armoured Brigade (3) Headquarters, 3rd Armoured Brigade & Signal Section 2nd Royal Tank Regiment 3rd Royal Tank Regiment (4) 5th Royal Tank Regiment 1st Support Group (5) Headquarters, 1st Support Group & Signal Section 2nd Bn. The King’s Royal Rifles Corps 1st Bn. The Rifle Brigade (Prince Consort’s Own) 1st Regiment, Royal Horse Artillery (H.Q., A/E & B/O Batteries, Royal Horse Artillery) 2nd Regiment, Royal Horse Artillery (H.Q., L/N & H/I Batteries, Royal Horse Artillery) Divisional Troops 1st Field Squadron, Royal Engineers 1st Field Park Troop, Royal Engineers 1st Armoured Divisional Signals, (1st County of London Yeomanry (Middlesex, Duke of Cambridge’s Hussars)), Royal Corps of Signals ©www.BritishMilitaryH istory.co.uk Page 1 7 September 2020 [1 ARMOURED DIVISION (1940)] NOTES: 1. A pre-war Regular Army formation formerly known as The Mobile Division. The divisional headquarters were based at Priory Lodge near Andover, within Southern Command. This was the only armoured division in the British Army at the outbreak of the Second World War. The division remained in the U.K. training and equipping until leaving for France on 14 May 1940. Initial elements of the 1st Armoured Division began landing at Le Havre on 15 May, being sent to a location south of Rouen to concentrate and prepare for action.
    [Show full text]
  • THE BRITISH ARMY in the LOW COUNTRIES, 1793-1814 By
    ‘FAIRLY OUT-GENERALLED AND DISGRACEFULLY BEATEN’: THE BRITISH ARMY IN THE LOW COUNTRIES, 1793-1814 by ANDREW ROBERT LIMM A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY. University of Birmingham School of History and Cultures College of Arts and Law October, 2014. University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT The history of the British Army in the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars is generally associated with stories of British military victory and the campaigns of the Duke of Wellington. An intrinsic aspect of the historiography is the argument that, following British defeat in the Low Countries in 1795, the Army was transformed by the military reforms of His Royal Highness, Frederick Duke of York. This thesis provides a critical appraisal of the reform process with reference to the organisation, structure, ethos and learning capabilities of the British Army and evaluates the impact of the reforms upon British military performance in the Low Countries, in the period 1793 to 1814, via a series of narrative reconstructions. This thesis directly challenges the transformation argument and provides a re-evaluation of British military competency in the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Old, Unhappy, Far-Off Things a Little Learning
    1 Old, Unhappy, Far-off Things A Little Learning I have not been in a battle; not near one, nor heard one from afar, nor seen the aftermath. I have questioned people who have been in battle - my father and father-in-law among them; have walked over battlefields, here in England, in Belgium, in France and in America; have often turned up small relics of the fighting - a slab of German 5.9 howitzer shell on the roadside by Polygon Wood at Ypres, a rusted anti-tank projectile in the orchard hedge at Gavrus in Normandy, left there in June 1944 by some highlander of the 2nd Argyll and Sutherlands; and have sometimes brought my more portable finds home with me (a Minie bullet from Shiloh and a shrapnel ball from Hill 60 lie among the cotton-reels in a painted papier-mache box on my drawing-room mantelpiece). I have read about battles, of course, have talked about battles, have been lectured about battles and, in the last four or five years, have watched battles in progress, or apparently in progress, on the television screen. I have seen a good deal of other, earlier battles of this century on newsreel, some of them convincingly authentic, as well as much dramatized feature film and countless static images of battle: photographs and paintings and sculpture of a varying degree of realism. But I have never been in a battle. And I grow increasingly convinced that I have very little idea of what a battle can be like. Neither of these statements and none of this experience is in the least remarkable.
    [Show full text]
  • The London Gazette, October 12, 1888. 5605
    THE LONDON GAZETTE, OCTOBER 12, 1888. 5605 The Queen has also been pleased to approve of (H. 6402.) Mr. John Bovey as Consul at Cardiff, for the Board of Trade (Harbour Department}, ^Republic of Liberia. London, October 12, 188S. The Queen has also been pleased to approve of THE Board of Trade have received through Mr. Robert Morstadt as Vice-Consul for the the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs a Island of Penang, for the German Empire. translation of a Notice, dated 7th instant, from The Queen has also been pleased to approve of the " Gaccta do Madrid," stating that quarantine Mr. Alejandro F. Baillie as Vice-Ctxnsul in Lon- has been established against the Philippine don, for the Republic of Paraguay. Islands in consequence of cholera having appeared in certain towns and in the capital of those Islands. Whitehall, October 6, 1888. THE Queen has been pleased to grant unto Admiralty, 9ih October, 1888. John Palricius Musters (now calling himself John Patricius Chaworth-Musters), of Annesley Park, Engineer John Hughes Adams has been promoted in the county of Nottingham, Esquire, in the to the rank of Chief Engineer in Her Majesty's Commission of the Peace for the said county, Fleet. Dated 1st October, 1888. eldest son and heir of John Chaworth Musters, In accordance with the provisions of Her late of Annesley Park aforesaid, Esquire, in the Majesty's Order in Council of 22nd February, Commission of the Peace, Deputy Lieutenant and 1870— (in 1864) High Sheriff for the said county of Fleet Paymaster James William Lishman has Nottingham, deceased, Her Royal licence and been placed on the Retired List, at his own authority that he and his issue may assume and request, with permission to assume the rank of continue to use the surname of Chaworth, in Paymaster-in-Chief.
    [Show full text]
  • Common and Noteworthy Instruments from 1750S-1800S' Eastern
    Common and Noteworthy Instruments from 1750s-1800s’ Eastern USA Emory Jacobs Faculty Sponsor: Dr. Scott Marosek Department of Music During the 1700s and 1800s, residents of the eastern seaboard of North America enjoyed a wide variety of instruments, many of them built for “contrast and variety.”1 Availability, on the other hand, was a different story. While few accounts of the musical scene in that time period exist for more rural settings, records of the area and the events of the period from 1750 through the 1800s paint an interesting picture of how specific social classes and needs determined an instrument’s popularity. At the time, instruments were highly controversial, especially among specific religious groups.2 The religious restrictions on music occurred in relatively isolated sub- cultures in America, whereas notable sources from Germany would spend a novel’s worth of pages praising how perfect the organ was and would carefully list the detail of instruments’ tuning, mechanisms, and origins.3 When comparing these European instrument lists or collections with confirmed colonial instruments, one finds that very few of the elaborate, most prized instruments were exported to North America. Even outside America’s religious institutions, instruments were sometimes considered profane.4 While some instruments and some musical styles escaped such stigma, other instruments and styles had more ominous ties or were considered inelegant; the violin and fiddle offer one illustration.5 The phenomenon suggests that American society’s acceptance of music may have been a sensitive or subtle affair, as the difference between the violin and fiddle is often described as the fiddle being a poorly crafted violin or, in some cases, as a different musical style performed on the violin.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplement to the Londom Gazette, 23 June, 1915. 6113
    SUPPLEMENT TO THE LONDOM GAZETTE, 23 JUNE, 1915. 6113 Lieutenant-General Sir James Willcocks, Lieutenant-Colonel (honorary Colonel) K.C.B., K.C.S.I., K.C.M.G., D.S.O., Com- The Right Honourable Lord Richard manding Indian Army Corps, British Expe- Frederick Cavendish, 5th Battalion, Royal ditionary Force. Lancaster Regiment (Territorial Force). Lieutenant-Colonel Algernon Hamilton Stannus Goff, Royal Artillery. To be Additional Members of the Second Lieutenant-Colonel Henry Wickham, The Class, or Knights Commanders of the said Most Northamptonshire Yeomanry (Territorial Distinguished Order: — Force). Lieutenant-General Sir John Grenfell Lieutenant-Colonel Frederic Gustav Lewis, Maxwell, K.C.B., C.V.O., C.M.G., D.S.O., 13th Princess Louise's Kensington Battalion, Colonel, The Black Watch (Royal High- The London Regiment (Territorial Force). landers), General Officer Commanding The Lieutenant-Colonel Arthur Anthony Force in Egypt. Howell, 3rd Battalion, The London Regi- Major-General (temporary Lieutenant- ment, Royal Fusiliers (Territorial Force). General) Sir Cecil Frederick Nevil Macready, Lieutenant-Colonel Harry Walker, 4th K.C.B., Adjutant-General, British Expe- City of Dundee Battalion, Royal High- ditionary Force. landers (Territorial Force). Major-General (temporary Lieutenant- Lieutenant-Colonel Colquhoun Scott General) William Riddell Birdwood, Dodgson, Army Service Corps. K.C.S.I., C.B., C.I.E., D.S.O., Indian Lieutenant-Colonel Herbert Graham Army, Mediterranean Expeditionary Force. Stainforth, Indian Army. Lieutenant-Colonel Rupert Shoolbred, 16th Battalion, The London Regiment, To be Additional Members of the Third Queen's Westminster Rifles (Territorial Class, or Companions of the said Most Dis- Force). tinguished Order: — Lieutenant-Colonel Robert Sydney Hamil- ton, Army Ordnance Department.
    [Show full text]
  • TRANSFORMING the BRITISH ARMY an Update
    TRANSFORMING THE BRITISH ARMY An Update © Crown copyright July 2013 Images Army Picture Desk, Army Headquarters Designed by Design Studio ADR002930 | TRANSFORMING THE BRITISH ARMY 2013 TRANSFORMING THE BRITISH ARMY 2013 | 1 Contents Foreword 1 Army 2020 Background 2 The Army 2020 Design 3 Formation Basing and Names 4 The Reaction Force 6 The Adaptable Force 8 Force Troops Command 10 Transition to new Structures 14 Training 15 Personnel 18 Defence Engagement 21 Firm Base 22 Support to Homeland Resilience 23 Equipment 24 Reserves 26 Army Communication Strategic Themes 28 | TRANSFORMING THE BRITISH ARMY 2013 TRANSFORMING THE BRITISH ARMY 2013 | 1 Foreword General Sir Peter Wall GCB CBE ADC Gen Chief of the General Staff We have made significant progress in refining the detail of Army 2020 since it was announced in July 2012. It is worth taking stock of what has been achieved so far, and ensuring that our direction of travel continues to be understood by the Army. This comprehensive update achieves this purpose well and should be read widely. I wish to highlight four particular points: • Our success in establishing Defence Engagement as a core Defence output. Not only will this enable us to make a crucial contribution to conflict prevention, but it will enhance our contingent capability by developing our understanding. It will also give the Adaptable Force a challenging focus in addition to enduring operations and homeland resilience. • We must be clear that our capacity to influence overseas is founded upon our credibility as a war-fighting Army, capable of projecting force anywhere in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • TRADITIONS of WAR This Page Intentionally Left Blank Traditions of War
    TRADITIONS OF WAR This page intentionally left blank Traditions of War OCCUPATION, RESISTANCE, AND THE LAW KARMA NABULSI 1 3 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford ox2 6dp Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide in Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With offices in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and certain other countries Published in the United States by Oxford University Press Inc., New York © Karma Nabulsi 1999 The moral rights of the author have been asserted Database right Oxford University Press (maker) First published 1999 First published in paperback 2005 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organizations. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above You must not circulate this book in any other binding or cover and you must impose the same condition on any acquirer British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Data available Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Nabulsi, Karma.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 13: North and South, 1820-1860
    North and South 1820–1860 Why It Matters At the same time that national spirit and pride were growing throughout the country, a strong sectional rivalry was also developing. Both North and South wanted to further their own economic and political interests. The Impact Today Differences still exist between the regions of the nation but are no longer as sharp. Mass communication and the migration of people from one region to another have lessened the differences. The American Republic to 1877 Video The chapter 13 video, “Young People of the South,” describes what life was like for children in the South. 1826 1834 1837 1820 • The Last of • McCormick • Steel-tipped • U.S. population the Mohicans reaper patented plow invented reaches 10 million published Monroe J.Q. Adams Jackson Van Buren W.H. Harrison 1817–1825 1825–1829 1829–1837 1837–1841 1841 1820 1830 1840 1820 1825 • Antarctica • World’s first public discovered railroad opens in England 384 CHAPTER 13 North and South Compare-and-Contrast Study Foldable Make this foldable to help you analyze the similarities and differences between the development of the North and the South. Step 1 Mark the midpoint of the side edge of a sheet of paper. Draw a mark at the midpoint. Step 2 Turn the paper and fold the outside edges in to touch at the midpoint. Step 3 Turn and label your foldable as shown. Northern Economy & People Economy & People Southern The Oliver Plantation by unknown artist During the mid-1800s, Reading and Writing As you read the chapter, collect and write information under the plantations in southern Louisiana were entire communities in themselves.
    [Show full text]
  • The British War Office
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 1976 The rB itish War Office ;: from the Crimean War to Cardwell, 1855-1868. Paul H. Harpin University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses Harpin, Paul H., "The rB itish War Office ;: from the Crimean War to Cardwell, 1855-1868." (1976). Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014. 1592. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses/1592 This thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE BRITISH WAR OFFICE: FROM THE CRIMEAN WAR TO CARDWELL, 1855-1868 A Thesis Presented by Paul H. Harpin Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts in partial Ifillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF ARTS May 19 76 History THE BRITISH WAR OFFICE: FROM THE CRIMEAN WAR TO CARDWELL , 1855-1868 A Thesis by Paul H. Harpin Approved as to style and content by: Harold J. Gordon, Jr. , Chairmakyof Committee Franklin B. Wickv/lre, Member Mary B. Wickwire , Member Gerald W. McFarland, Department Head History Department May 1976 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE iv Chapter I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. INEFFICIENCY, NEGLIGENCE AND THE CRIMEAN WAR 7 III. REORGANIZATION 1855-1860 . 27 General 27 Correspondence and the Conduct of Business within the War Office 37 Civil-Military Relations 4 9 Armaments and Artillery Administration .... 53 Engineers 57 Clothing 61 Armaments Manufacture 64 The Accountant General's Office 71 Commissariat * 75 Conclusion 81 IV.
    [Show full text]
  • The Castle and the Virgin in Medieval
    I 1+ M. Vox THE CASTLE AND THE VIRGIN IN MEDIEVAL AND EARLY RENAISSANCE DRAMA John H. Meagher III A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate School of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY December, 1976 Approved by Doctoral Committee BOWLING GREEN UN1V. LIBRARY 13 © 1977 JOHN HENRY MEAGHER III ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 11 ABSTRACT This study examined architectural metaphor and setting in civic pageantry, religious processions, and selected re­ ligious plays of the middle ages and renaissance. A review of critical works revealed the use of an architectural setting and metaphor in classical Greek literature that continued in Roman and medieval literature. Related examples were the Palace of Venus, the House of Fortune, and the temple or castle of the Virgin. The study then explained the devotion to the Virgin Mother in the middle ages and renaissance. The study showed that two doctrines, the Immaculate Conception and the Assumption of Mary, were illustrated in art, literature, and drama, show­ ing Mary as an active interceding figure. In civic pageantry from 1377 to 1556, the study found that the architectural metaphor and setting was symbolic of a heaven or structure which housed virgins personifying virtues, symbolically protective of royal genealogy. Pro­ tection of the royal line was associated with Mary, because she was a link in the royal line from David and Solomon to Jesus. As architecture was symbolic in civic pageantry of a protective place for the royal line, so architecture in religious drama was symbolic of, or associated with the Virgin Mother.
    [Show full text]