Natural History: Life on the Edge

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Natural History: Life on the Edge Peaks protected fifty years ago by the Edge Wilderness Act no longer keep mountain goats safe from human impact. any of the planet’s species live—and go ex- acteristics of both goats and antelopes, possessing fragile tinct—in obscurity. An untold number have skulls, and short, dagger-like horns that look similar in yet to be “discovered” by inquisitive humans. males and females. on the They may roam the oceans’ dark depths or This year marks the fiftieth anniversary of the passage Life Papua New Guinea’s rainforest canopy, or of the Wilderness Act, the law by which the United States Story and Photographs by Bruce L. Smith wriggle through Congress created the National M the soil beneath our very feet. Wilderness Preservation Sys- Some surprisingly sizable ani- tem and set aside such pris- mals have escaped the prying tine habitats as the Selway- eyes of scientists. Only last Au- Bitterroot and Bob Marshall gust a new species of bamboo Wilderness Areas in my home shark that “walks” on its fins state of Montana. The follow- was observed in Indonesia. A ing definition was made in new primate, the Lavasoa dwarf 1964: “A wilderness, in con- lemur, was discovered in Mada- trast with those areas where gascar last July. And in Brazil a man and his own works dom- second species of a spotted cat, inate the landscape, is hereby the oncilla, and a new species recognized as an area where of tapir—a 240-pound relative the earth and community of of horses and the rhinoceros— life are untrammeled by man, were recorded with camera traps where man himself is a visitor for the first time. who does not remain . an Even cataloged life forms area of undeveloped Federal can dwell in near anonymity, a land retaining its primeval dim existence that can be both character and influence, with- a blessing and a curse. Obscu- out permanent improvements rity may spare such creatures or human habitation, which from intentional exploitation is protected and managed so but also leave them without a as to preserve its natural con- constituency to champion their ditions . .” No large animal defense. One such reclusive and better characterizes the high, seldom-seen species is Oreamnos rugged wildlands than the americanus, a charismatic, shag- American mountain goat. To- gy, horned beast whose only day the goats roam entirely on extant relatives live half a world public lands, which include away. Inhabiting some of North Male mountain goat in its winter coat national parks in six states and America’s remotest wildlands, three Canadian provinces, it might as well roam the Himalayas, like its relatives the though that doesn’t guarantee their protection. gorals (Nemorhaedus spp.) and serows (Capricornis spp.), for how few Americans have seen a mountain goat in the orty thousand years or more ago, ancestral moun- wild. Although it is commonly called the Rocky Moun- tain goats crossed the Bering Land Bridge from Due in part to its tain goat, a more accurate moniker would be the Ameri- Asia to the New World, as did most of North remote habitat, can mountain goat (or just mountain goat), because its F America’s extant and extinct large mammal spe- the mountain goat, native distribution goes beyond the Rocky Mountains cies. The Great Ice Age’s conditions shaped O. ameri- Oreamnos ameri- and includes the Cascade and Coast mountain ranges canus to the cold, rugged environment it roams today, canus, rarely gets of western North America. In fact, these are not “true” from southern Alaska to the western Northwest Ter- championed. goats of the genus Capra, but animals exhibiting char- ritories and southward through Canada into Montana, 22 NATURAL H I S TO RY July/August 2014 July/August 2014 NATURAL H I S TO RY 23 mountaineering skills to hunt this sure-footed climber. Where they stray from steep terrain, bears and wolves more successfully prey on mountain goats. And on rare oc- casions, even wolverines and ea- gles have taken young goats. But starvation, climbing accidents, and deep winter snows claim more goats than do predators. Fluctuat- ing temperatures in the spring pre- cipitate avalanches that sometimes engulf the cliff dwellers. In U.S. and Canadian studies, the smallest and least experienced goats proved most vulnerable to the hazards of their life on the rocks. Half of all newborns may fail to survive their first year, with the mortality of yearlings not far behind. americanus escaped much of the nineteenth-centu- ry carnage experienced O. by other large North American mammals killed for profit, pleasure, and subsistence during the settle- ment of the West. Elk and prong- horn antelope Idaho, and Washington. Equipping it with traits that beauty, insulation, and comfort. The white coat reflects Montana’s Selway-Bitterroot Wil- were reduced permit it to seemingly defy gravity on the high peaks, solar radiation, enabling goats to graze on exposed ter- derness provides prime summer from millions to the mountain goat’s specialization starts with the feet. rain in summer, rather than retreating to the coolness of habitat for the mountain goat a mere 50,000 (above), and Jones’s columbine, Oversize, flexible hooves with pliable hoof pads are the forests. Still, on August afternoons they may lounge on Aquilegia jonesii, (right), is one of and 13,000, re- animal world’s equivalent of studded tires. A stocky remnant snowfields to better thermoregulate, and to ease many alpine flowers that grace the spectively, and an body provides a low center of gravity, contributing to the aggravation of insect pests. And, from November mountain goat’s summer range. estimated 25 to its uncanny agility on narrow ledges. While the goat’s through April, most goats favor cliffs and crags that face 50 million bison distant cousins, bighorn sheep, bound crisply across a southerly slanting sun. Like woolly veg-o-matics, they broad ridges and offers food were wanton- slopes and rocky outcrops, the goat is a methodical paw through snow for grasses and sedges, nibble moss- in larger patches, goats may ly slaughtered, plodder and inclined to stick to steeper terrain. (Once I es and lichens from rocks, strip twigs from shrubs, and socialize in groups of ten or leaving fewer watched a goat climb to the top of a dizzying pinnacle sometimes dig the rhizomes of ground-hugging plants. more animals. Conversely in than 1,000 in all and stand with all four feet together on a summit mea- Their unforgiving habitat has no doubt shaped the Alaska and British Columbia’s of the United suring only eight inches square. Then he raised a hind social behavior of mountain goats. A rigid, matriarchal coastal ranges—where snow States by 1887. foot, scratched behind an ear, and shook the dust from social structure limits group sizes to an average of just piles higher than a house— We might as- his white coat, as I looked on in wonder.) two or three animals. Competition for prime feeding goats descend far down the mountains and strip lichens sume that the mountain goat and other mountaintop The goat epitomizes the concept of layering for sites in a vertical world—with mere snacks on precarious from ancient trees in the dark depths of winter. biota would remain buffered from human exploita- warmth. It has a flowing outer pelage that protects a shelves—is fierce. Sparse spacing of animals across rug- Of all North America’s large herbivores, the moun- tion. But that immunity abruptly ended during the cashmere-like mantle of under-fur. From May until Au- ged real estate prevents a population from depleting its tain goat (rivaled only by the musk ox) enjoys the great- latter half of the twentieth century. Industrial and rec- gust, goats progressively shed their shaggy winter coats food supply and forestalls stress and disease that can ac- est freedom from competition with other herbivores for reational development and mechanized travel increas- and slowly adopt trim summer attire. For centuries na- company overcrowding. In some high-altitude environ- food and space—a reward of sorts for its specialization ingly penetrated remote areas. Logging, mining, and tive peoples along the Pacific coast have collected the ments, such as the Rocky Mountain ranges of Colorado and desolate domain. Likewise, most predators, with the motorized recreation sometimes displaced goats from shed hair to weave blankets and garments prized for their and interior Canada, where wind sweeps the snow from exception of the mountain lion, lack the tenacity or the winter ranges, and the survival of young goats declined. 24 NATURAL H I S TO RY July/August 2014 July/August 2014 NATURAL H I S TO RY 25 Hunting became easier; some hard-hit herds in Mon- could not be managed as intensively as deer, elk, and and the mountain goat planet’s ecosystems tana, Idaho, Washington, southern British Columbia, pronghorn, for example, and wildlife and land manag- may serve as a charis- are being stressed and and Alberta were severely overharvested. Over the ers were slow to limit goat harvests and curb motorized matic exemplar. As for- transformed by climate past fifty years, native goat populations may have de- travel in goat ranges. In 1988, Alberta closed goat hunt- ests march up mountain change. The plights of clined by half in British Columbia and by two-thirds in ing province-wide. As herds slowly recovered, conserva- slopes, alpine tundra pikas, meltwater stone- Washington State, based on wildlife agency estimates. tive hunting resumed there in 2001. Other jurisdictions shrinks, and permanent flies, and wolverines Wildlife managers believe that 100,000 mountain have pared back recreational hunting, with most now snowfields and glaciers have gained attention goats remain on the continent today, with less than 15 restricting harvests to discrete breeding herds number- melt, this cold-adapted through public efforts percent of those living south of the Canadian border.
Recommended publications
  • Educator's Guide
    Educator’s Guide the jill and lewis bernard family Hall of north american mammals inside: • Suggestions to Help You come prepared • essential questions for Student Inquiry • Strategies for teaching in the exhibition • map of the Exhibition • online resources for the Classroom • Correlations to science framework • glossary amnh.org/namammals Essential QUESTIONS Who are — and who were — the North as tundra, winters are cold, long, and dark, the growing season American Mammals? is extremely short, and precipitation is low. In contrast, the abundant precipitation and year-round warmth of tropical All mammals on Earth share a common ancestor and and subtropical forests provide optimal growing conditions represent many millions of years of evolution. Most of those that support the greatest diversity of species worldwide. in this hall arose as distinct species in the relatively recent Florida and Mexico contain some subtropical forest. In the past. Their ancestors reached North America at different boreal forest that covers a huge expanse of the continent’s times. Some entered from the north along the Bering land northern latitudes, winters are dry and severe, summers moist bridge, which was intermittently exposed by low sea levels and short, and temperatures between the two range widely. during the Pleistocene (2,588,000 to 11,700 years ago). Desert and scrublands are dry and generally warm through- These migrants included relatives of New World cats (e.g. out the year, with temperatures that may exceed 100°F and dip sabertooth, jaguar), certain rodents, musk ox, at least two by 30 degrees at night. kinds of elephants (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Horned Animals
    Horned Animals In This Issue In this issue of Wild Wonders you will discover the differences between horns and antlers, learn about the different animals in Alaska who have horns, compare and contrast their adaptations, and discover how humans use horns to make useful and decorative items. Horns and antlers are available from local ADF&G offices or the ARLIS library for teachers to borrow. Learn more online at: alaska.gov/go/HVNC Contents Horns or Antlers! What’s the Difference? 2 Traditional Uses of Horns 3 Bison and Muskoxen 4-5 Dall’s Sheep and Mountain Goats 6-7 Test Your Knowledge 8 Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Division of Wildlife Conservation, 2018 Issue 8 1 Sometimes people use the terms horns and antlers in the wrong manner. They may say “moose horns” when they mean moose antlers! “What’s the difference?” they may ask. Let’s take a closer look and find out how antlers and horns are different from each other. After you read the information below, try to match the animals with the correct description. Horns Antlers • Made out of bone and covered with a • Made out of bone. keratin layer (the same material as our • Grow and fall off every year. fingernails and hair). • Are grown only by male members of the • Are permanent - they do not fall off every Cervid family (hoofed animals such as year like antlers do. deer), except for female caribou who also • Both male and female members in the grow antlers! Bovid family (cloven-hoofed animals such • Usually branched.
    [Show full text]
  • Idaho Mountain Goat Management Plan (2019-2024)
    Idaho Mountain Goat Management Plan 2019-2024 Prepared by IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME June 2019 Recommended Citation: Idaho Mountain Goat Management Plan 2019-2024. Idaho Department of Fish and Game, Boise, USA. Team Members: Paul Atwood – Regional Wildlife Biologist Nathan Borg – Regional Wildlife Biologist Clay Hickey – Regional Wildlife Manager Michelle Kemner – Regional Wildlife Biologist Hollie Miyasaki– Wildlife Staff Biologist Morgan Pfander – Regional Wildlife Biologist Jake Powell – Regional Wildlife Biologist Bret Stansberry – Regional Wildlife Biologist Leona Svancara – GIS Analyst Laura Wolf – Team Leader & Regional Wildlife Biologist Contributors: Frances Cassirer – Wildlife Research Biologist Mark Drew – Wildlife Veterinarian Jon Rachael – Wildlife Game Manager Additional copies: Additional copies can be downloaded from the Idaho Department of Fish and Game website at fishandgame.idaho.gov Front Cover Photo: ©Hollie Miyasaki, IDFG Back Cover Photo: ©Laura Wolf, IDFG Idaho Department of Fish and Game (IDFG) adheres to all applicable state and federal laws and regulations related to discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, gender, disability or veteran’s status. If you feel you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility of IDFG, or if you desire further information, please write to: Idaho Department of Fish and Game, P.O. Box 25, Boise, ID 83707 or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Division of Federal Assistance, Mailstop: MBSP-4020, 4401 N. Fairfax Drive, Arlington, VA 22203, Telephone: (703) 358-2156. This publication will be made available in alternative formats upon request. Please contact IDFG for assistance. Costs associated with this publication are available from IDFG in accordance with Section 60-202, Idaho Code.
    [Show full text]
  • Antelope, Deer, Bighorn Sheep and Mountain Goats: a Guide to the Carpals
    J. Ethnobiol. 10(2):169-181 Winter 1990 ANTELOPE, DEER, BIGHORN SHEEP AND MOUNTAIN GOATS: A GUIDE TO THE CARPALS PAMELA J. FORD Mount San Antonio College 1100 North Grand Avenue Walnut, CA 91739 ABSTRACT.-Remains of antelope, deer, mountain goat, and bighorn sheep appear in archaeological sites in the North American west. Carpal bones of these animals are generally recovered in excellent condition but are rarely identified beyond the classification 1/small-sized artiodactyl." This guide, based on the analysis of over thirty modem specimens, is intended as an aid in the identifi­ cation of these remains for archaeological and biogeographical studies. RESUMEN.-Se han encontrado restos de antilopes, ciervos, cabras de las montanas rocosas, y de carneros cimarrones en sitios arqueol6gicos del oeste de Norte America. Huesos carpianos de estos animales se recuperan, por 10 general, en excelentes condiciones pero raramente son identificados mas alIa de la clasifi­ cacion "artiodactilos pequeno." Esta glia, basada en un anaIisis de mas de treinta especlmenes modemos, tiene el proposito de servir como ayuda en la identifica­ cion de estos restos para estudios arqueologicos y biogeogrMicos. RESUME.-On peut trouver des ossements d'antilopes, de cerfs, de chevres de montagne et de mouflons des Rocheuses, dans des sites archeologiques de la . region ouest de I'Amerique du Nord. Les os carpeins de ces animaux, generale­ ment en excellente condition, sont rarement identifies au dela du classement d' ,I artiodactyles de petite taille." Le but de ce guide base sur 30 specimens recents est d'aider aidentifier ces ossements pour des etudes archeologiques et biogeo­ graphiques.
    [Show full text]
  • Bighorn Sheep, Moose, and Mountain Goats
    Bighorn Sheep, Moose, and Mountain Goats Brock Hoenes Ungulate Section Manager, Wildlife Program WACs: 220-412-070 Big game and wild turkey auction, raffle, and special incentive permits. 220-412-080 Special hunting season permits. 220-415-070 Moose seasons, permit quotas, and areas. 220-415-120 2021 Bighorn sheep seasons and permit quotas. 220-415-130 2021 Mountain goat seasons and permit quotas. 1. Special Hunting Season Permits 2. Moose – Status, recommendations, public comment 3. Mountain Goat – Status, recommendations, public comment 4. Bighorn Sheep – Status, recommendations, public comment 5. Questions Content Department of Fish and Wildlife SPECIAL HUNTING SEASON PERMITS White‐Tailed DeerWAC 220-412-080 • Allow successful applicants for all big game special permits to return their permit to the Department for any Agree 77% reason two weeks prior to the Neutral 9% opening day of the season and to have their points restored Disagree 14% 1,553 Respondents • Remove the “once‐in‐a‐lifetime” Public Comment restriction for Mountain Goat Conflict • 223 comments, 1 email/letter Reduction special permit category • General (90 agree, 26 disagree) • Reissue permit (67) • >2 weeks (21) • No change (12) Department of Fish and Wildlife MOOSE • Primarily occur in White‐Tailed DeerNE and north-central Washington • Most recent estimate in 2016 indicated ~5,000 moose in NE • Annual surveys to estimate age and sex ratios (snow dependent) • Recent studies (2014-2018) in GMUs 117 and 124 indicated populations were declining • Poor body condition (adult female) • Poor calf survival • Wolf predation • Tick infestations • Substantial reduction in antlerless permits in 2018 Department of Fish and Wildlife MOOSE RECOMMENDATIONS 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 67Th Legislature HB 318.2
    67th Legislature HB 318.2 1 HOUSE BILL NO. 318 2 INTRODUCED BY K. HOLMLUND, D. SALOMON, D. BARTEL, D. BEDEY, J. DOOLING, K. WHITMAN 3 4 A BILL FOR AN ACT ENTITLED: “AN ACT REVISING WILD BUFFALO AND WILD BISON LAWS; 5 CLARIFYING THE DEFINITION OF "WILD BUFFALO" OR "WILD BISON"; CLARIFYING THAT THE PER 6 CAPITA FEE DOES NOT APPLY TO CERTAIN DOMESTIC BISON; AMENDING SECTIONS 15-24-921, 81-1- 7 101, 87-2-101, AND 87-6-101, MCA; AND PROVIDING AN IMMEDIATE EFFECTIVE DATE.” 8 9 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MONTANA: 10 11 Section 1. Section 15-24-921, MCA, is amended to read: 12 "15-24-921. Per capita fee to pay expenses of enforcing livestock laws. (1) (a) A per capita fee is 13 authorized and directed to be imposed by the department on all poultry and honey bees, all swine 3 months of 14 age or older, and all other livestock 9 months of age or older in each county of this state. The fee is in addition 15 to appropriations and is to help pay the salaries and all expenses connected with the enforcement of the 16 livestock laws of the state and bounties on wild animals as provided in 81-7-104. 17 (b) A per capita fee may not be imposed on bison owned by a tribal member OR TRIBE and located on 18 fee land or tribal land within the boundaries of a reservation. 19 (2) The per capita fee is due on May 31 of each year.
    [Show full text]
  • Region One Mountain Goat Report 2016 Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks
    Region One Mountain Goat Report 2016 Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks Since this is a progress report only, results herein are not necessarily final and may be subject to change. The information in this report may not be published or used for other purposes without permission of MFWP. Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks Region One Headquarters 490 Meridian Road Prepared by Jessy Coltrane, PhD Kalispell, Montana 59901 Kalispell Area Wildlife Biologist INTRODUCTION Mountain goats (Oreamos americanus) historically occupied most available montane cliff habitat throughout northwest Montana (Fish Wildlife & Parks, Administrative Region 1); however, since the 1950s, native mountain goat numbers have experienced a dramatic decline. Thus, once occupied habitat is now devoid of goats, and current mountain goat range is significantly reduced from its historic expanse. In the 1940s and 1950s, mountain goats were considered an abundant and not easily depleted resource in northwest Montana. Population estimates for mountain goats in the region described 350 mountain goats in the Swan Mountains, 20 in the North Fork of the Flathead, 315 in the Clark’s Fork, 900 in Glacier Park, 100 near Coram, 450 from Spotted Bear to Schaffer Meadows, and 250 in Big Prairie (Montana Department of Fish and Game 1958). Native herds in the South Fork of the Flathead River and the Swan Mountains were used as source populations to establish new goat herds in mountain ranges throughout Montana and Colorado. From 1948 to 1953, 66 goats were transplanted from the South Fork of the Flathead River and 13 from Van Lookout in the Swan Range (Picton and Lonner 2008). In addition to capture removals, wildlife managers allowed for unlimited harvest of mountain goats.
    [Show full text]
  • Range Expansion and Population Growth of Non-Native Mountain
    Wildlife Society Bulletin; DOI: 10.1002/wsb.636 Original Article Range Expansion and Population Growth of Nonnative Mountain Goats in the Greater Yellowstone Area: Challenges for Management ELIZABETH P. FLESCH,1 Fish and Wildlife Ecology and Management Program, Ecology Department, Montana State University, 310 Lewis Hall, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA ROBERT A. GARROTT, Fish and Wildlife Ecology and Management Program, Ecology Department, Montana State University, 310 Lewis Hall, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA P. J. WHITE, National Park Service, Yellowstone National Park, P.O. Box 168, Yellowstone National Park, WY 82190, USA DOUG BRIMEYER, Wyoming Game and Fish Department, 420 N Cache, P.O. Box 67, Jackson, WY 83001, USA ALYSON B. COURTEMANCH, Wyoming Game and Fish Department, 420 N Cache, P.O. Box 67, Jackson, WY 83001, USA JULIE A. CUNNINGHAM, Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks, 1400 S 19th Avenue, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA SARAH R. DEWEY, National Park Service, Grand Teton National Park, P.O. Box 170, Moose, WY 83012, USA GARY L. FRALICK, Wyoming Game and Fish Department, P.O. Box 1022, Thayne, WY 83127, USA KAREN LOVELESS, Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks, 1354 Highway 10 W, Livingston, MT 59047, USA DOUG E. MCWHIRTER, Wyoming Game and Fish Department, 2820 State Highway 120, Cody, WY 82414, USA HOLLIE MIYASAKI, Idaho Department of Fish and Game, 4279 Commerce Circle, Idaho Falls, ID 83401, USA ANDREW PILS, United States Forest Service, Shoshone National Forest, 203A Yellowstone Avenue, Cody, WY 82414, USA MICHAEL A. SAWAYA, Fish and Wildlife Ecology and Management Program, Ecology Department, Montana State University, 310 Lewis Hall, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA SHAWN T.
    [Show full text]
  • Rocky Mountain Goats
    Big Game Statistics: Rocky Mountain Goats ROCKY MOUNTAIN GOATS: Table of Contents Overview Life history ........................................................................................................ 121 Distribution ...................................................................................................... 121 Management...................................................................................................... 122 2005 Statistical Reports Rocky mountain goat herd composition ............................................................ 123 Rocky mountain goat season harvest ..................................................................124 10 Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Big Game Statistics: Rocky Mountain Goats Overview Rocky Mountain goats (Oreamnos americanus) are native only to the rugged mountains of western North America. The presence of mountain goats in Oregon prior to Euro- pean settlement is supported by archeological evidence in Hells Canyon and Wildcat Canyon, 30 miles east of The Dalles. Rocky Mountain goats were apparently extirpated from Oregon prior to, or soon after, European settlement. Life History Goats Mountain goat pelage is comprised of white wool and white guard hairs. Their hooves have cushion-like pads surrounded by a hard shell, allowing a grip on smooth rock Rocky Mountain surfaces. During summer months females molt about a month later than males, which is useful in determining sex of adults. Animals will often rub against obstacles, leaving clumps of discarded wool
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief History of Mountain Goat Population Management on the Kenai Peninsula by Dom Watts
    Refuge Notebook • Vol. 19, No. 12 • March 24, 2017 A brief history of mountain goat population management on the Kenai Peninsula by Dom Watts Prior to 1971, mountain goat harvests in the Kenai Mountains were essentially unrestricted. Harvests during the 1950s and 1960s resulted in significant de- clines in many mountain goat populations. As rela- tively high harvests continued throughout the 1970s, Kenai goat populations declined by 25% or more. Much of the following was pulled from an excellent article by Thomas McDonough and Jeff Selinger, local biologists with the Alaska Department of Fish & Game. In some areas, like Cecil Rhode Mountain near Cooper Landing, overharvests even resulted in lo- calized extirpation. Reintroductions during the early 1980s, coupled with natural recolonization from nearby areas and limited local harvests, helped Mountain goat populations may be increasing on the reestablish the population of mountain goats that we Kenai Peninsula (credit: National Park Service). see there today. During the early 1970s, depletion of mountain goat populations became increasingly apparent and harvest Mountain goats are found throughout the Kenai limits were reduced to one goat per year. The total Mountains, including lands managed by the Kenai Na- number of hunters afield, however, was not limited tional Wildlife Refuge. While mountain goats have and goat populations continued to decline under high been introduced to Kodiak Island, the Kenai Moun- harvest pressure, particularly in easily accessible ar- tains represent the westernmost extent of the species’ eas. natural range in North America. Mountain goats oc- cur at their highest densities in coastal areas, but they During the 1980s, ADF&G established distinct hunt also occur at lower densities throughout the interior units to more evenly distribute hunting pressure and Kenai Mountains.
    [Show full text]
  • Orf Virus Infection in Alaskan Mountain Goats, Dall's Sheep, Muskoxen
    Tryland et al. Acta Vet Scand (2018) 60:12 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13028-018-0366-8 Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica RESEARCH Open Access Orf virus infection in Alaskan mountain goats, Dall’s sheep, muskoxen, caribou and Sitka black‑tailed deer Morten Tryland1* , Kimberlee Beth Beckmen2, Kathleen Ann Burek‑Huntington3, Eva Marie Breines1 and Joern Klein4* Abstract Background: The zoonotic Orf virus (ORFV; genus Parapoxvirus, Poxviridae family) occurs worldwide and is transmit‑ ted between sheep and goats, wildlife and man. Archived tissue samples from 16 Alaskan wildlife cases, representing mountain goat (Oreamnos americanus, n 8), Dall’s sheep (Ovis dalli dalli, n 3), muskox (Ovibos moschatus, n 3), Sitka black-tailed deer (Odocoileus hemionus= sitkensis, n 1) and caribou (Rangifer= tarandus granti, n 1), were analyzed.= = = Results: Clinical signs and pathology were most severe in mountain goats, afecting most mucocutaneous regions, including palpebrae, nares, lips, anus, prepuce or vulva, as well as coronary bands. The proliferative masses were solid and nodular, covered by dark friable crusts. For Dall’s sheep lambs and juveniles, the gross lesions were similar to those of mountain goats, but not as extensive. The muskoxen displayed ulcerative lesions on the legs. The caribou had two ulcerative lesions on the upper lip, as well as lesions on the distal part of the legs, around the main and dew claws. A large hairless spherical mass, with the characteristics of a fbroma, was sampled from a Sitka black-tailed deer, which did not show proliferative lesions typical of an ORFV infection. Polymerase chain reaction analyses for B2L, GIF, vIL-10 and ATI demonstrated ORFV specifc DNA in all cases.
    [Show full text]
  • INFORMATION to USERS This Manuscript Has Been Reproduced from the Microfilm Master
    The takin and muskox: A molecular and ecological evaluation of relationship Item Type Thesis Authors Groves, Pamela Download date 01/10/2021 15:20:15 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/11122/9423 INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. Hie quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margin^ and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. » Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sectionssmall overlaps.with Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6” x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. A Bell & Howell Information Company 300 North Zeeb Road. Ann Arbor. Ml 48106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]