Citizen Schools Catalyst Project Steerco #1
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Citizen Schools Catalyst Project SteerCo #1 December 3rd, 2018 DRAFT Catalyst project meeting roadmap Project Holiday weeks Start up 1 2 3 4 5 6 break 7 8 9 10 11 Week 10/29 11/5 11/12 11/19 11/26 12/3 12/10 12/17- 1/2 1/7 1/14 1/21 1/28 beginning Today’s 1/1 meeting Nov 13th Dec 3rd Jan 16th Jan 30th Project Kickoff: SteerCo #1: SteerCo #2: SteerCo #3: • Introduce project team • Review initial assessment of attractiveness • Decide which Catalyst model to • Review final of Catalyst product pursue based on a refined view refinements to model • Review project scope, calendar, – Demand among schools and corporate partners of: strategy and financials and deliverables – Competitive and partner landscape – Attractiveness (including model (as needed) • Discuss goals of Catalyst and financials) • Discuss preliminary view on Citizen Schools’ • Align on near-term dimensions for evaluating – Fit and ability to win ability to win and fit with Catalyst product mobilization plan Catalyst (attractiveness, fit, and • Define capabilities and assets – Capabilities to build out ability to win) – Fit with capabilities and operational feasibility – Ability to scale needed to deliver strategy – Partners to engage • Align on key discussion topics for – Potential for differentiation • Review preliminary list of customer interviews (schools and partners to engage corporate partners) • Agree on set of Catalyst models, including Model 1 and Model 2, to explore in-depth BOS 181203 Catalyst Project SteerC ... 2 Objectives for today’s discussion Review initial view of demand and market opportunity for Catalyst Discuss set of potential model options for Catalyst and the strengths and risks of each model Align on major areas for further exploration for SteerCo #2 BOS 181203 Catalyst Project SteerC ... 3 AGENDA Project context and framework for assessing Catalyst Summary of perspectives to date Initial view of demand for Catalyst among school leadership and corporate partners Preliminary analysis on competitive and partner landscape for Catalyst Best Catalyst model options for further evaluation and next steps Appendix: Detailed backup analysis BOS 181203 Catalyst Project SteerC ... 4 Reminder: We will use a variety of factors to assess which Catalyst model to scale Primary focus of Bain’s work Attractiveness Fit and ability to win Impact Demand for Fit with mission and ability to Ability to Catalyst inspire stakeholders fundraise Competitive Financial model Required vs. current Ability to environment capabilities scale BOS 181203 Catalyst Project SteerC ... 5 How we defined the five key elements of Catalyst Five key elements of Catalyst Definitions for customer interviews and competitive analysis • Volunteers General contractor • General contractor – Coordinates and packages all four – STEM industry professionals and topic Catalyst elements into single, experts integrated offering – Help facilitate project and enhance – Develops relationships with schools learning in the classroom and districts, including sales Curriculum Student assessments • Teacher professional – Handles the logistics, scheduling, and development administration of program – Volunteer-focused PD for integration of • Curriculum volunteers into the classroom Curriculum- – 8-10 hours of in-school class time – Curriculum-focused PD directly tied to focused teacher spread over 4-5 weeks teaching the content via project-based professional learning – STEM-focused, NGSS-aligned, development project-based curriculum, with clear Volunteers • Assessments mapping to standards Volunteer- – NGSS and core standards mastery focused teacher – Includes lesson plans, sequencing, professional scaffolding, scope, and materials – Social and emotional learning surveys development – STEM topic & career interest surveys – 21st Century skill development Source: Citizen Schools’ Catalyst presentations BOS 181203 Catalyst Project SteerC ... 6 To date, we’ve conducted 1:1s with the SteerCo and 19 customer interviews with school leadership and corporate partners Citizen Schools 1:1s School leadership interviews Corporate partner interviews • Em McCann, CEO Citizen Schools contacts • Jessica Anderson, Strategic Giving Manager, Dell • Nell Kisiel, VP of Strategy and Business • Florin Purice, Principal, Isaac Newton Middle • Nick Sirianni, Senior Manager, PwC Development School • Rita German, Director of Community Investments • Amy Hoffmaster, Catalyst Managing Director • Brian Bradley, Principal, Renaissance School of the and Corporate Responsibility, John Hancock Arts • Aimee Sargent, Chief External Engagement Officer • Ryan Kish, Senior Program Manager, Arconic • Alison Riordan, Curriculum Coordinator, Plymouth Foundation • Mike Kubiak, Managing Director, Foundations & Public Schools Evaluation • Sarah MacDonald, Executive Director, Life Science • Sanda Balaban, Former Regional Superintendent, Cares • Patricia Corbett, Catalyst Volunteer Support New York City Manager • Alain Balan, Program Manager, Excellence for All, • Lauren Chamberlain, Catalyst Director of Training & Other resources Boston Public Schools Support • Erik Turner, Principal, Sedgefield Middle School • Interviews conducted by Bridgespan as part of the • Colin Lacy, Managing Director, US2020 City 2017-2018 Catalyst work Network Bain contacts • Secondary research reports • Maria Drake, Executive Director, CA • Principal, Cambridge – “Strategies to Scale Up Social Programs: Pathways, Partnerships and Fidelity,” prepared by The Wallace • Wendy Lee, Executive Director, NY • Industry Expert, San Francisco Foundation, 2017 • Vanessa Bishop, Managing Director, MA • Superintendent, Chicago – “Expanding Opportunities to Successfully Support Early Readers: A Five-Year Study of Reading Partners Colorado,” • ED of Curriculum and Instruction, Minneapolis prepared by Augenblick, Palaich and Associates, 2017 • Principal, Portland • Citizen Schools materials – “Catalyst” • Regional Superintendent, New York City – “Catalyst Program Overview” – “Overview of Catalyst Model for Bain” • Principal, Portland – “Catalyst Year 1 Report” • Principal, San Francisco – “Catalyst Design Workshop” – “Catalyst Pilot Volunteer Training” – “Catalyst Pilot – Project Overview: Thermal Energy” BOS 181203 Catalyst Project SteerC ... 7 AGENDA Project context and framework for assessing Catalyst Summary of perspectives to date Initial view of demand for Catalyst among school leadership and corporate partners Preliminary analysis on competitive and partner landscape for Catalyst Best Catalyst model options for further evaluation and next steps Appendix: Detailed backup analysis BOS 181203 Catalyst Project SteerC ... 8 Summary of perspectives to date (1 of 2) Demand for • School leadership and corporate partners have strong interest in Catalyst driven by its focus on STEM real-world Catalyst learning experiences and ability to facilitate meaningful and unique connections for both students and volunteers • Volunteer matching and training is seen as Catalyst’s key differentiating element as few organizations provide quality STEM volunteers today – Curriculum and volunteer matching are the most important programmatic elements of Catalyst, whereas teacher professional development and assessments are less important – Catalyst must provide both quality volunteers who drive student engagement and interest and quality curriculum that drives specific outcomes; both volunteers and curriculum need to be easily integrated into the school day • Catalyst appeals to corporate partners because they look for organizations that provide a menu of civic engagement opportunities across their various office locations – Catalyst’s shorter program length (4-5 weeks vs. 10 weeks), high scale and high leverage model, and potential to expand into new geographies are particularly compelling – Programming during the middle of the work day and volunteer familiarity with STEM subjects were both cited as potential, but not insurmountable, obstacles to sourcing volunteers Competitive • Catalyst has the potential to be a differentiated product; there are few comparable offerings that integrate a STEM, and partner project-based learning curriculum with an industry professional volunteer overlay landscape – Nepris is the only scale volunteer matching player; however, it differs from Catalyst because it primarily focuses on providing one-time, for Catalyst virtual connections that leverage teacher-developed project plans – All other comparable products are smaller, regional players (e.g., Educurious, Science for Scientists), have a different focus (e.g., TEALs focused exclusively on computer science), or could be potential partners as they do not currently offer strong volunteer matching services (e.g., Project Lead The Way - PLTW) • Partnership opportunities exist across the three other programmatic elements of Catalyst; however, potential project- based learning curriculum partners are limited beyond PLTW, the current market leader BOS 181203 Catalyst Project SteerC ... 9 Summary of perspectives to date (2 of 2) Model • Catalyst model options have various strengths and risks with tradeoffs between several factors, including control over options for product quality and mission, capability requirements, and scalability Catalyst – Model 1: “Full service” model > In Model 1, Catalyst is delivered primarily via Citizen Schools; Citizen Schools acts as the general contractor, owns the curriculum, teacher professional development, and volunteer matching and training, and partners with a third party for assessments > Model 1 is