US AID/Russia On-Going Activities

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

US AID/Russia On-Going Activities US AID/Russia On-going Activities as of January 1st, 2001 Table of Contents SO 1.3 Accelerated Development and Growth of Private Enterprises . 1 IR 1.3.l Policies, Legislation and Regulations Conducive to Broad Based Competition and Private Sector Growth Adopted IR 1.3.2 Successful Models of Private Ownership and Modern Management Widely Replicated IR 1.3.3 Sustainable Network of Business Support Institutions Rendering Services to Entrepreneurs and Enterprises 1. Entrepreneurial Business Services - East . 2 2. Entrepreneurial Business Services - West.. 3 3. Novgorod SME Suppo1t and Development Project (NSDP)......... .. .. .. 4 4. Khabarovsk Regional Micro Lending Program. 5 5. Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises Business Climate Survey (SMEBCS). 6 6. Samara Regional Micro Lending Program . 7 7. Sakhalin Regional Micro Lending Program . 8 8. Tomsk Regional Microfinance Program. ..... ....... 9 9. Russian Initiative for Self-Employment (RISE). 10 10. Small Business Opportunities . 11 11. Printing of Economic Materials and Teachers Training (Junior Achievement Russia)................ ............................................ 12 12. Business Education Project (BEP). 14 13. Morozov Project, Phase II. 15 14. Business Development in the Russian Far East. 17 15. Small Business Working Group Action Plan Implementation. 18 16. Tomsk Regional Initiative Administrative Barriers Analysis. 19 17. Program to Revitalize Agriculture through Regional Investment (PRARI) . 20 18. Mbbilizing Agricultural Credit (MAC) Program. 21 19. The Farmer to Farmer Program (FtF) ........... ..... .................... 22 20. Implementation of Innovative Technologies Program (INTECH) in the Samara Oblast........... .. ................... ... ... .......... ........ 23 21. Implementation of Innovative Technologies Program (INTECH/Tomsk) in the Tomsk Oblast . 24 SO 1.4 Improved Economic Infrastructure to Support Market- Oriented Growth . 25 IR 1.4.1 Tax System Fair and Efficient IR 1.4.2 Legal and Regulatory Framework for Financial Sector Established and Strengthened IR 1.4.3 International Accounting Standards (!AS) Properly Match Revenues and Expenses to Improve Existing Operations and Make Financial Reporting Transparent for Banking Sector Supervision IR 1.4.4 Economic Think Tanks' Analytical and Policy Advice Capabilities Strengthened to Support Sound Policy Formulation 1. Intergovernmental Fiscal Reform . 26 2. Financial Viability Analysis . 27 3. Technical Assistance to Support the Development of Sound Financial Infrastructure . 28 4. Technical Assistance for Banking Reform Through Russia' s Inter Agency Coordinating Committee (IACC) . 29 5. Development Credit Authority Program .......... ...... ........ ... 30 6. Loan Po1tfolio Guarantee Program (LPG) . 31 7. Bank Training Program . .......... .. .......... ............ .... 32 8. Regional Economic Policy and Investment Strategy (REPAIS) . ... .. .. .... 33 9. Alaska Sakhalin Working Group .... ... .. ........ ....... ....... 34 10. Institute for the Economy in Transition (IET) . 35 11. Strengthening Pro gram for Economic Think Tanks . 36 12. Accounting Standards (Tomsk) ................... ................. 37 13. Regional Initiative Promotion of International Accounting Standards (Tomsk) 38 SO 1.6 Increased Environmental Management Capacity to Support Sustainable Economic Growth . 39 IR 1.6.1 Increased Capacity to Deal with Environmental Pollution as a Threat to Public Health IR 1.6.2 Improved Management of Natural Resources and Biodiversity Protection IR 1.6.3 Improved Economic Mechanisms for Natural Resources Management and Environmental Protection 1. Environment Roll-Out (ROLL) ................ .... ...... .... 40 2. Replication of Lessons Learned (ROLL-2000) . ......... ............ 41 3. Forest Resources and Technologies (FOREST) Project. .... ... ... ........ 42 4. Biodiversity Conservation in the Russian Far East. ............. .... 43 5. Sustainable Forest Management Initiative in the Russian Far East (RFE) .... 44 6. EcoLinks in the Russian Far East . 45 ii so 2.1 Increased, Better Informed Citizens' Participation in Political and Economic Decision-Making. 46 IR 2.1.l Free and Fair Elections Administered Nationally and Locally IR 2.1.2 Increased Public Access to Information which is Needed for Informed Political and Economic Choices IR 2.1.3 NGO Sector Provides Alternative to Ballot Box for Participating in Economic and Political Decision-Making 1. Promoting and Strengthening Russian NGO Development (Pro-NGO Activity)47 2. ISAR - NGO Support Program in the Russian Far East (RFE) ............. 48 3. Suppmt to Women's Crisis Centers. 49 4. Program to Promote and Defend Women's Rights in Russia (Phase II)..... 50 5. Trade Union Development Program ............ ..... .... ... ....... 51 6. Independent Television . 52 7. Political Participation: Patties and Civic Patticipation . 54 8. Political Institutions in a Democratic Society . 55 9. Electoral System Development .. .. .... .. .. .... ... .... .... .. 56 10. Strengthening Democratic Institutions and Civil Society . 57 11. Strengthening Democracy through Public Awareness. 58 12. Citizen Participation in Samara . 59 SO 2.2 Strengthened Rule of Law and Respect for Human Rights . 60 IR 2.2.1 Independent Russian Judicia1y IR 2.2.2 Judicial Decisions are Uniform, Predictable, Applied Equally and Made without Delay IR 2.2.3 Competent Counsel Available in Russia IR 2.2.4 Presence of Enforcement Service Induces Better Execution of Civil Judgements IR 2.2.5 Effective Advocacy for Adherence to International Human Rights Commitments Increased 1. Judicial Exchange Program Between the Russian and US Judiciaries . 61 2. Enforcement of Judgments ..... .. : . 62 3. Development of the Legal Profession. 63 4. Strengthen Corporate Governance . 64 5. Eurasia Foundation/Anti-Corruption Grant Program. 65 6. Strengthen Human Rights NGOs . 66 7. Human Rights Monitoring . 67 iii SO 3.2 Improved Effectiveness of Selected Social Benefits and Services . 68 IR 3.2.a.l New Approaches to Service Delivery Adopted IR 3.2.a.2 Response to Irifectious Disease Improved IR 3.2.b.l Social Service Delivery Systems Improved IR 3.2.b.2 Targeted City Services Move Towards Full Cost Recove1y SO 3.2.a 1. Women and Infant Health (WIN) . ........... ............... 69 2. Women's Reproductive Health Operations Research. 70 3. HIV/AIDS Prevention...... ...... .. .... ................... 71 4. World Health Organization Tuberculosis Activities. 72 5. PASA with the U.S. Depaitment of Health and Human Services Office of International and Refugee Health . 73 6. AIHA Health Partnerships . 7 4 7. Health Care Quality Assurance . 7 5 8. Legal Regulatory Reform . 76 9. Assistance to Russian Orphans (ARO). 78 so 3.2.b 10. Accelerating Russian Restructuring at the Local Level: Housing, Communal Services, and Real Estate Reform . 79 11 . Improving Social Service Delivery Systems (ISSDS) . 80 12. Regional Public Finance and Investment Project in Russia. 81 13. Real Estate Association and Industry Development . 82 14. Heat Efficiency Leveraging Programs in Regional Initiative Sites (Samai·a, Magadan, Tomsk) . 83 so 4.2 Cross-Cutting Initiatives . 84 1. Sustaining Partnerships into the Next Century (SPAN) . 85 2. Russia Training for Development (TFD) Activity . 86 3. Russian Longitudinal Monitoring Survey (RLMS). 88 4. Eurasia Foundation, Grant-making Institution in the NIS . 89 iv so 1.3 Accelerated Development and Growth of Private Enterprises IR 1.3.l Policies, Legislation and Regulations Conducive to Broad Based Competition and Private Sector Growth Adopted IR 1.3.2 Successful Models of Private Ownership and Modern Management Widely Replicated IR 1.3.3 Sustainable Network of Business Support Institutions Rendering Services to Entrepreneurs and Enterprises Key Implementation Activities as of October 31, 2000 1. Entrepreneurial Business Services - East ............... .. ... .. ...... ... .. .......... .. ... .......... .. ... ...... .. .... ............ 2 2. Entrepreneurial Business Services - West ... ... .... ..... .... .... .................... ............... .. ......... .. .... ... ........ 3 3. Novgorod SME Suppmt and Development Project (NSDP) .. .......... .. ..................... .............. .......... 4 4. Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises Business Climate Survey (SMEBCS) .. .... .... .. .... .... .............. 5 5. Khabarovsk Regional Micro Lending Program ... ............. ..................... ..... ................. ...... ............. 6 6. Samara Regional Micro Lending Program.......... ... ................... ......... .. ................ .. ...... ... .... ............ 7 7. Sakhalin Regional Micro Lending Program. ........... .. ... ..... ............. .... ...... ... .. .... ....................... .. ..... 8 8. Tomsk Regional Microfinance Program ... ...... ...... ..... ........ ......... .. ... .. ..... .. ................................ .. .. .. 9 9. Russian Initiative for Self-Employment (RISE) .. ................ .. .. ...................................................... 10 10. Small Business Opportunities ............................................................................................... ........ 11 11. Printing of Economic Materials and Teachers Training (Junior Achievement Russia) ... ..... .. .. .. .. .. 12 12. Business Education Project (BEP) .... ... .. ... .. .... .... .... .... .. .. .. .. ..... .. ... ..... .... .. ... ................................. 14 13. Morozov Project, Phase II ........ .. ...................... .. ........ .. .... ..
Recommended publications
  • (Hymenoptera, Symphyta) Большехехцирского Заповедника С
    Амурский зоологический журнал, 2019, том XI, № 1 Amurian Zoological Journal, 2019, vol. XI, no. 1 www.azjournal.ru УДК 595.793 DOI: 10.33910/1999-4079-2019-11-1-72-77 http://www.zoobank.org/References/3BCBB470-E17E-4207-9DA4-F6529D369A52 ДОПОЛНЕНИЯ И ИСПРАВЛЕНИЯ К СПИСКУ ПИЛИЛЬЩИКОВ (HYMENOPTERA, SYMPHYTA) БОЛЬШЕХЕХЦИРСКОГО ЗАПОВЕДНИКА С. В. Василенко Институт систематики и экологии животных Сибирского отделения РАН, ул. Фрунзе, д. 11, Новосибирск, 630091, Россия Сведения об авторе Аннотация. Приводится 16 видов пилильщиков. Среди них 13 видов ранее Василенко Сергей Владимирович не отмечались на территории Большехехцирского заповедника. Acantholyda E-mail: [email protected] parki Shinohara et Byun, 1996, Arge disparilis (Kirby, 1882), A. flavomixta (André, SPIN-код: 9176-8171 1881), A. nigrovaginata Malaise, 1931, Strongylogaster empriaeformis (Malaise, 1931), Macrophya sanguinolenta (Gmelin, 1790), M. vacillans Malaise, 1931, Rhogogaster chlorosoma (Benson, 1943) и R. sibirica Enslin, 1912 впервые обнаружены в Хабаровском крае. A. hasegawae Takeuchi, 1927 впервые найден в Хабаровском крае и на о-ве Кунашир. Обсуждаются некоторые проблемы, связанные с сибирскими и дальневосточными видами рода Rhogogaster Konow, 1884. Ключевые слова: пилильщики, новые находки, Большехехцирский заповедник, Дальний Восток. AMENDMENTS TO THE LIST OF SAWFLIES (HYMENOPTERA, SYMPHYTA) OF THE BOLSHEKHEKHTSIRSKII RESERVE S. V. Vasilenko Institute of Animal Systematics and Ecology, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 11 Frunze Str., Novosibirsk, 630091, Russia Author Abstract. The paper lists 16 species of sawflies of which 13 species were Sergey V. Vasilenko discovered on the territory of the Bolshekhekhtsirskii reserve for the first E-mail: [email protected] time. Acantholyda parki Shinohara et Byun, 1996, Arge disparilis (Kirby, SPIN: 9176-8171 1882), A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Potential for Integration of the Transport Complex of the East of Russia Into the International Market of Transport Services
    BRANCH-WISE ECONOMY DOI: 10.15838/esc.2019.6.66.8 UDC 332.1+339.924, LBC 65.049(2) © Bardal’ A.B. The Potential for Integration of the Transport Complex of the East of Russia into the International Market of Transport Services Anna B. Bardal’ Economic Research Institute, Far Eastern Branch of RAS Khabarovsk, Russian Federation, 153,Tikhookeanskaya Street, 680042 E-mail: [email protected] ORCID: 0000-0002-9944-4714; ResearcherID: V-7615-2017 Abstract. The eastern regions of Russia are the convenient zone in which Russia cooperates with the actively developing Asian region. The key states of North-East Asia such as China, Japan, and the Republic of Korea are the largest participants in world trade at the present stage. The servicing of large- scale commodity flows with the European Union and the U.S. is provided by the market of transport services, by means of which the most effective schemes of delivery are built. Under these conditions, the transport system of the East of Russia has objective prerequisites for integration into the international transport system. The goal of our present study is to assess the potential of integration of the transport system of the Far East in the market of transport services in North-East Asia. At the same time, we assess integration opportunities with the help of dividing the territory of the East of Russia into districts based on the results of cluster analysis. Considering the achievement of the research goal, this approach is a new one. The need for division is due to the fact that the Far East is quite a large region, extremely heterogeneous in its internal composition, economic-geographical and socio-economic characteristics.
    [Show full text]
  • RCN #33 21/8/03 13:57 Page 1
    RCN #33 21/8/03 13:57 Page 1 No. 33 Summer 2003 Special issue: The Transformation of Protected Areas in Russia A Ten-Year Review PROMOTING BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION IN RUSSIA AND THROUGHOUT NORTHERN EURASIA RCN #33 21/8/03 13:57 Page 2 CONTENTS CONTENTS Voice from the Wild (Letter from the Editors)......................................1 Ten Years of Teaching and Learning in Bolshaya Kokshaga Zapovednik ...............................................................24 BY WAY OF AN INTRODUCTION The Formation of Regional Associations A Brief History of Modern Russian Nature Reserves..........................2 of Protected Areas........................................................................................................27 A Glossary of Russian Protected Areas...........................................................3 The Growth of Regional Nature Protection: A Case Study from the Orlovskaya Oblast ..............................................29 THE PAST TEN YEARS: Making Friends beyond Boundaries.............................................................30 TRENDS AND CASE STUDIES A Spotlight on Kerzhensky Zapovednik...................................................32 Geographic Development ........................................................................................5 Ecotourism in Protected Areas: Problems and Possibilities......34 Legal Developments in Nature Protection.................................................7 A LOOK TO THE FUTURE Financing Zapovedniks ...........................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5. Project Environmental Impact 63 5.1
    E1188 TRANSLATION FROM RUSSIAN Preparation stage for the Project on Fire Management in High Conservation Value Forests of the Amur-Sikhote-Alin Ecoregion Grant GEF PPG TF051241 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized F I N A L R E P O R T Project on Fire Management in High Conservation Value Forests of the Amur- Sikhote-Alin Ecoregion Environmental Impact Assessment Public Disclosure Authorized EIA Leader D.Biol. B.A. Voronov Public Disclosure Authorized Khabarovsk – February 2005 2 Summary Report: 125 pages, figures 4, tables 12, references 70, supplements 2 AMUR-SIKHOTE-ALIN ECOREGION, HIGH CONSERVATION VALUE FORESTS, MODEL TERRITORIES, RESERVES, FOREST FIRE MANAGEMNT, CONSERVATION, BIODIVERSITY Analysis and assessment of Project on Fire Management in High Conservation Value Forests of the Amur-Sikhote-Alin Ecoregion Goals: assessment of Project environmental impact and contribution to the implementation of the program on forest fire prevention, elimination and control in the Amur-Sikhote-Alin ecoregion. Present-day situation, trends and opportunities for developing a fire prevention, elimination and control system were in the focus of attention. Existing data and materials have been studied to reveal forest fire impact on environment as well as Project environmental impact. Project under consideration is aimed at improving current fire management system and strengthening protection of ecoregion forests from degradation, which make it extremely socially and ecologically valuable and important. 3 List of Specialists Senior researcher, C.Biol.Sc. A.L. Antonov (Chapter 3) Senior researcher, D.Biol. B.A. Voronov (Introduction, Chapters 2,5,6) Senior researcher, C.Agr.Sc. A.K. Danilin (Chapter 4) Senior researcher, C.Biol.Sc.
    [Show full text]
  • Newell, J. 2004. the Russian Far East
    Industrial pollution in the Komsomolsky, Solnechny, and Amursky regions, and in the city of Khabarovsk and its Table 3.1 suburbs, is excessive. Atmospheric pollution has been increas- Protected areas in Khabarovsk Krai ing for decades, with large quantities of methyl mercaptan in Amursk, formaldehyde, sulfur dioxide, phenols, lead, and Type and name Size (ha) Raion Established benzopyrene in Khabarovsk and Komsomolsk-on-Amur, and Zapovedniks dust prevalent in Solnechny, Urgal, Chegdomyn, Komso- molsk-on-Amur, and Khabarovsk. Dzhugdzhursky 860,000 Ayano-Maysky 1990 Between 1990 and 1999, industries in Komsomolsky and Bureinsky 359,000 Verkhne-Bureinsky 1987 Amursky Raions were the worst polluters of the Amur River. Botchinsky 267,400 Sovetsko-Gavansky 1994 High concentrations of heavy metals, copper (38–49 mpc), Bolonsky 103,600 Amursky, Nanaisky 1997 KHABAROVSK zinc (22 mpc), and chloroprene (2 mpc) were found. Indus- trial and agricultural facilities that treat 40 percent or less of Komsomolsky 61,200 Komsomolsky 1963 their wastewater (some treat none) create a water defi cit for Bolshekhekhtsirsky 44,900 Khabarovsky 1963 people and industry, despite the seeming abundance of water. The problem is exacerbated because of: Federal Zakazniks Ⅲ Pollution and low water levels in smaller rivers, particular- Badzhalsky 275,000 Solnechny 1973 ly near industrial centers (e.g., Solnechny and the Silinka River, where heavy metal levels exceed 130 mpc). Oldzhikhansky 159,700 Poliny Osipenko 1969 Ⅲ A loss of soil fertility. Tumninsky 143,100 Vaninsky 1967 Ⅲ Fires and logging, which impair the forests. Udylsky 100,400 Ulchsky 1988 Ⅲ Intensive development and quarrying of mineral resourc- Khekhtsirsky 56,000 Khabarovsky 1959 es, primarily construction materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural, Spatial, and Legal Displacement of the Korean Diaspora in the USSR: 1937-1945
    Article Cultural, Spatial, and Legal Displacement of the Korean Diaspora in the USSR: 1937-1945 Jonathan Otto POHL The Review of Korean Studies Volume 21 Number 1 (December 2018): 171-188 ©2018 by the Academy of Korean Studies. All rights reserved. 172 The Review of Korean Studies Introduction The Soviet deportation of the Russian-Koreans in 1937 greatly altered their legal status, spatial distribution, and everyday culture. It restricted their civil rights, particularly their freedom of movement, and officially denoted them as “administrative exiles.” They did not have the same right to choose their place of residence or freely move from place to place as most other citizens of the USSR. In this respect they suffered from legal restrictions similar to the kulaks deported earlier and the Russian-Germans, Karachais, Kalmyks, Chechens, Ingush, Balkars, Crimean Tatars, and Meskhetian Turks deported later as special settlers. Thus a significant number of Soviet citizens defined by nationality including the Koreans had legal disabilities imposed upon them that made their status inferior to that of the general Soviet population. The NKVD confined the deported Russian-Koreans to the five Central Asian republics, mostly Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan, and attempted to limit movement by them within this region. Although as can be seen below with the significant migration of Russian-Koreans from Kazakhstan to Uzbekistan, they were often not successful in this second goal. In addition to restricting the mobility of the Russian- Koreans the NKVD also kept them under strict surveillance as a suspect people. Indirectly this restriction on movement also greatly limited their options for employment and education.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1 Plant Genera Eaten by Ungulates (Wi, Winter; Sp, Spring; Su, Summer; Au,Autumn)
    Appendix 1 Plant Genera Eaten by Ungulates (Wi, winter; Sp, spring; Su, summer; Au,autumn) Table 1. Plant genera eaten by Equus hemionus' Plant genera Locality" Badkhyz Nature Reserve! Barsakelmes Qapshaghay Game Island / Husbandry' (Seasons) Wi Sp Su Acanthophyllum +++ r ++ Acroptilon + Aegilops r ++ +++ Aeluropus r +++ Agropyron +++ Alhagi ++ ++ r ++ Allium +++ Amberboa +++ Anabasis +++ +++ Aphanopleura ++ Arabis + Aristida + Arnebia +++ +++ r Artemisia +++ +++ Astragalus +++ ++ + Atraphaxis r + + Atriplex ++ +++ Bongardia ++ Bromus +++ +++ +++ + ++ Bunium +++ Calamagrostis + Calligonum ++ ++ Caragana + ++ Cardaria ++ Carex +++ +++ +++ +++ Carthamnus ++ Centaurea ++ Ceratocarpus +++ Chorispora + Convolvulus +++ Cousinia +++ ++ r Crypsis ++ Delphinium +++ Table 1. Continued Plant genera Locality'' Badkhyz Nature Reserve' Barsakelmes Qapshaghay Game Island/ Husbandr y' (Seasons) Wi Sp Su Elymus + Ephedra ++ Eremopyrum +++ ++ +++ + Eremostachys r +++ Erodium ++ Euclidium + Eurotia +++ Ferula ++ ++ ++ Filipendula ++ Frankenia ++ Halocnemum +++ ++ Haloxylo n ++ +++ + Hordeum ++ +++ ++ Isatis +++ r Ixiolirion +++ Kochia + Lagonychium ++ Lepidium +++ Leptale um +++ Limonium +++ r + Lycium + Malcolmia ++ r ++ Medicago +++ Mentha +++ Nitraria ++ Onobrych is +++ Papaver ++ Phragmites + +++ Pistacia ++ Poa +++ +++ +++ +++ Psoralea ++ Ranunculus +++ Rheum + Roemeria ++ Rosa + Salsola +++ r + +++ Schismus ++ r Scorzonera +++ Secale ++ Sisy mbrium +++ Sorghum +++ Sphenopus r ++ Stipa ++ r + +++ Tamarix ++ r ++ + Tanacetum +++ ' Symbols indicate %
    [Show full text]
  • Mayfly Biodiversity (Insecta, Ephemeroptera) of the Russian Far East
    Евразиатский энтомол. журнал. Том 11. Прил. 2: 27–34 © EUROASIAN ENTOMOLOGICAL JOURNAL, 2012 Mayfly biodiversity (Insecta, Ephemeroptera) of the Russian Far East Áèîðàçíîîáðàçèå ïîä¸íîê (Insecta, Ephemeroptera) ðîññèéñêîãî Äàëüíåãî Âîñòîêà T.M. Tiunova Ò.Ì. Òèóíîâà Institute of Biology and Soil Sciences, Russian Academy of Sciences, Far East Branch, 100 let Vladivostoku ave. 159, Vladivostok 690022 Russia. E-mail: [email protected]. Биолого-почвенный институт ДВО РАН, просп. 100 лет Владивостоку 159, Владивосток 690022 Россия. Key words: Ephemeroptera, mayfly, fauna, Russian Far East. Ключевые слова: подёнки, фауна, Дальний Восток, Россия. Abstract. The mayfly fauna of the Russian Far East Наибольшее сходство видового состава подёнок currently includes 176 species from 39 genera and 18 fami- Дальнего Востока России с прилегающими территория- lies (i.e. 70 % of the total number of species known in ми отмечено для Японии и Кореи. Russia). The greatest diversity of mayflies is recorded from В биогеографическом отношении в фауне подёнок the southern part of the Russian Far East, including the доминируют палеархеарктические виды, составляющие basins of the Ussuri River, Amur, and the Sea of Japan. более 43 % фауны подёнок Дальнего Востока России. Species with Palaearchearctic ranges represent 43 % of the Наиболее обильны по числу видов с палеархеарктичес- mayfly fauna of the Russian Far East. Mayfly species com- ким и восточно-палеарктическим типами ареалов водо- position of the Russian Far East is similar to surrounding токи бассейнов рек Уссури, Амура и Японского моря. territories of Japan and Korea. Резюме. Фауна подёнок Дальнего Востока России Introduction представлена 176 видами из 39 родов и 18 семейств, что Biological diversity presents balance between for- составляет около 70 % фауны подёнок России и около mation and extinction of species over the course of the 4 % мировой фауны.
    [Show full text]
  • Systematic and Biogeographical Study of Protura (Hexapoda) in Russian Far East: New Data on High Endemism of the Group
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 424:Systematic 19–57 (2014) and biogeographical study of Protura (Hexapoda) in Russian Far East... 19 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.424.7388 RESEARCH ARTICLE www.zookeys.org Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Systematic and biogeographical study of Protura (Hexapoda) in Russian Far East: new data on high endemism of the group Yun Bu1, Mikhail B. Potapov2, Wen Ying Yin1 1 Institute of Plant Physiology and Ecology, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200032 China 2 Moscow State Pedagogical University, Kibalchich str., 6, korp. 5, Moscow, 129278 Russia Corresponding author: Yun Bu ([email protected]) Academic editor: L. Deharveng | Received 4 March 2014 | Accepted 4 June 2014 | Published 8 July 2014 http://zoobank.org/38EAC4B7-8834-4054-B9AC-9747AC476543 Citation: Bu Y, Potapov MB, Yin WY (2014) Systematic and biogeographical study of Protura (Hexapoda) in Russian Far East: new data on high endemism of the group. ZooKeys 424: 19–57. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.424.7388 Abstract Proturan collections from Magadan Oblast, Khabarovsk Krai, Primorsky Krai, and Sakhalin Oblast are re- ported here. Twenty-five species are found of which 13 species are new records for Russian Far East which enrich the knowledge of Protura known for this area. Three new species Baculentulus krabbensis sp. n., Fjellbergella lazovskiensis sp. n. and Yichunentulus alpatovi sp. n. are illustrated and described. The new materials of Imadateiella sharovi (Martynova, 1977) are studied and described in details. Two new combi- nations, Yichunentulus borealis (Nakamura, 2004), comb. n. and Fjellbergella jilinensis (Wu & Yin, 2007), comb.
    [Show full text]
  • Securing a Future for Amur Leopards and Tigers in Russia
    Securing a Future for Amur Leopards and Tigers in Russia – VI 2018 Final Report Phoenix Fund 1 Securing a Future for Amur Leopards and Tigers in Russia – VI • 2018 Final Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Background ................................................................................................................................................... 2 Project Summary ........................................................................................................................................... 3 Project Activities............................................................................................................................................ 4 SMART in five protected areas .................................................................................................................. 4 Annual workshop for educators ................................................................................................................ 8 Education in Khasan, Lazo, Terney and Vladivostok ................................................................................. 9 Tiger Day in Primorye .............................................................................................................................. 11 Art Contest .............................................................................................................................................. 13 Photo credits: PRNCO “Tiger “Centre”, Far Eastern Operational Customs Office, Land of the Leopard National Park, Alexander Ratnikov, and children's paintings
    [Show full text]
  • ALTA Conservation Update
    ALTA Conservation Update Amur Leopard and Tiger Alliance September 2007 Contributions by: • Tanya Arzhanova (Moscow Zoo) • Sergei Bereznuk (Phoenix Fund) • Martha Caron (Minnesota Zoo) • Sarah Christie (ZSL) • Michiel Hötte (ZSL / Tigris Foundation) • Anna Filippova, Masha Vorontsova and Maria Scherbacheva (IFAW) • Linda Kerley (Lazovsky Nature Reserve / WCS) • Sharon Miller (AMUR UK) and Katya Newman (AMUR Russia) • Dale Miquelle (WCS) ALTA contact person: Michiel Hötte, [email protected] New format for ALTA Conservation Updates The ALTA Conservation Update has a new format. From now on you will find our tiger, leopard and general news items in separate sections. Tigris Foundation will no longer distribute a separate Amur leopard newsletters. Instead, information about Amur leopards will be provided in the ALTA Conservation Updates. Topics: General 1. AMUR – Activities in late 2006 and early 2007 (Sharon Miller and Katya Newman) 2. Successful ALTA lobby in Moscow (Sharon Miller and Masha Vorontsova) Amur Tiger News 3. The International Tiger Coalition (ITC) and tiger trade in China (Sarah Christie) 4. Orphaned tiger cubs rescued (Anna Filippova and Masha Vorontsova) Amur Leopard News 5. Young female Amur leopard killed (Sergei Bereznuk) 6. Monitoring Far Eastern Leopards with Camera Traps (Dale Miquelle) 7. Medical and Genetic Assessments of wild Far Eastern Leopards (Dale Miquelle) 8. Amur leopard scat collection with dogs (Linda Kerley) 9. 2007 Winter Leopard Survey (Dale Miquelle) 10. Amur leopard reintroduction plan (Dale Miquelle) 11. North American Amur Leopard Population Management Plan (PMP) update (Martha Caron) 12. Amur Leopard EEP (European zoo breeding programme) update (Sarah Christie and Tanya Arzhanova) 1 Documents and information on Internet - Campaign against tiger trafficking (documents and films) available at www.tigrisfoundation.nl and www.endtigertrade.org - The Tiger Count 2005 final report is finally available.
    [Show full text]
  • Биота И Среда Заповедных Территорий Issn 2618-6764 Научный Рецензируемый Журнал 2019, № 2 Журнал Основан В 2013 Году, Издаётся С 2014 Года
    БИОТА И СРЕДА ЗАПОВЕДНЫХ ТЕРРИТОРИЙ ISSN 2618-6764 НАУЧНЫЙ РЕЦЕНЗИРУЕМЫЙ ЖУРНАЛ 2019, № 2 Журнал основан в 2013 году, издаётся с 2014 года. В 2014–2017 годах именовался «Биота и среда заповедников Дальнего Востока» (Biodiversity and Environment of Far East Reserves), ISSN 2227-149X. Учредители: Дальневосточное отделение Российской академии наук и Дальневосточный морской заповедник — филиал Национального научного центра морской биологии им. А. В. Жирмунского Дальневосточного отделения Российской академии наук. Редколлегия: главный редактор — Богатов Виктор Всеволодович, член-корр. РАН, д-р биол. наук, проф., Дальневосточное отделение РАН (ДВО РАН), Владивосток; зам. главного редактора — Дроздов Анатолий Леонидович, д-р биол. наук, проф., Национальный научный центр морской биологии им. А. В. Жирмунского ДВО РАН (ННЦМБ ДВО РАН), Владивосток; отв. секретарь редколлегии, и. о. зав редакцией — Тюрин Алексей Николаевич, канд. биол. наук, Дальне- восточный морской заповедник — филиал ННЦМБ ДВО РАН; Богачева Анна Вениаминовна, д-р биол. наук, Федеральный научный центр биоразнообразия наземной биоты Восточной Азии ДВО РАН (ФНЦ Биоразнообразия ДВО РАН), Владивосток; Боркин Лев Яковлевич, канд. биол. наук, Зоологический институт РАН (ЗИН РАН), Санкт-Петербург; Глущенко Юрий Николаевич, канд. биол. наук, проф., Дальневосточный федеральный университет (ДВФУ), филиал, Уссурийск; Дьякова Ольга Васильевна, д-р ист. наук, проф., Институт истории, археологии и этнографии народов Дальнего Востока ДВО РАН (ИИАЭ ДВО РАН), Владивосток; Ильин Игорь Николаевич, д-р биол. наук, Институт проблем экологии и эволюции им. А. Н. Северцова РАН, Москва; Прозорова Лариса Аркадьевна, канд. биол. наук, Федеральный научный центр биоразнообразия наземной биоты Восточной Азии ДВО РАН (ФНЦ Биоразнообразия ДВО РАН), Владивосток; Пушкарь Владимир Степанович, д-р геогр. наук, проф., Дальневосточный геологический институт ДВО РАН (ДВГИ ДВО РАН), Владивосток; Пшеничников Борис Фёдорович, д-р биол.
    [Show full text]