Mayfly Biodiversity (Insecta, Ephemeroptera) of the Russian Far East

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mayfly Biodiversity (Insecta, Ephemeroptera) of the Russian Far East Евразиатский энтомол. журнал. Том 11. Прил. 2: 27–34 © EUROASIAN ENTOMOLOGICAL JOURNAL, 2012 Mayfly biodiversity (Insecta, Ephemeroptera) of the Russian Far East Áèîðàçíîîáðàçèå ïîä¸íîê (Insecta, Ephemeroptera) ðîññèéñêîãî Äàëüíåãî Âîñòîêà T.M. Tiunova Ò.Ì. Òèóíîâà Institute of Biology and Soil Sciences, Russian Academy of Sciences, Far East Branch, 100 let Vladivostoku ave. 159, Vladivostok 690022 Russia. E-mail: [email protected]. Биолого-почвенный институт ДВО РАН, просп. 100 лет Владивостоку 159, Владивосток 690022 Россия. Key words: Ephemeroptera, mayfly, fauna, Russian Far East. Ключевые слова: подёнки, фауна, Дальний Восток, Россия. Abstract. The mayfly fauna of the Russian Far East Наибольшее сходство видового состава подёнок currently includes 176 species from 39 genera and 18 fami- Дальнего Востока России с прилегающими территория- lies (i.e. 70 % of the total number of species known in ми отмечено для Японии и Кореи. Russia). The greatest diversity of mayflies is recorded from В биогеографическом отношении в фауне подёнок the southern part of the Russian Far East, including the доминируют палеархеарктические виды, составляющие basins of the Ussuri River, Amur, and the Sea of Japan. более 43 % фауны подёнок Дальнего Востока России. Species with Palaearchearctic ranges represent 43 % of the Наиболее обильны по числу видов с палеархеарктичес- mayfly fauna of the Russian Far East. Mayfly species com- ким и восточно-палеарктическим типами ареалов водо- position of the Russian Far East is similar to surrounding токи бассейнов рек Уссури, Амура и Японского моря. territories of Japan and Korea. Резюме. Фауна подёнок Дальнего Востока России Introduction представлена 176 видами из 39 родов и 18 семейств, что Biological diversity presents balance between for- составляет около 70 % фауны подёнок России и около mation and extinction of species over the course of the 4 % мировой фауны. Анализ распространения подёнок по регионам Дальнего Востока России на уровне видов development of a biosphere. There are three basic показал, что наиболее богатыми регионами в видовом levels of the conservation and study of biological di- отношении являются бассейны рек Уссури (119 видов) versity: population/genetics, species and ecosystem. и Амур (121 вид), где сконцентрировано соответственно When developing strategy to conserve biological di- 67 % и 69 % дальневосточной фауны подёнок. Фауна versity, the species level is the most convenient to подёнок бассейна Японского моря включает в настоя- work, considering a species as a set of populations. щее время 100 видов, острова Сахалин — 61, Куриль- A fourth level is biogeocenosis, which is between the ского архипелага — 40, Охотского моря — 62, бассейна species and ecosystem levels. Biogeocenoses, that is, озера Ханка — 75, водотоков Камчатки — 28 и Чу- communities of organisms, form ecosystems. Thus, котки — 17 видов. Среди 176 видов дальневосточной conservation of biological diversity on the ecosystem фауны подёнок 36 видов встречаются только на Даль- level leads to conservation of the biogenesis of an нем Востоке России. Показан различный удельный вес семейств в той или ecosystem, the ecosystem’s species and their popula- иной стране. Так, представители семейства Behningiidae tions, i.e., all levels of the organization of biological отмечены только на территории Дальнего Востока Рос- diversity are addressed. сии, где они составляют 14 % от мировой фауны. В Япо- The Russian Far East occupies an area of 3,016 нии, Корее и Китае отсутствуют представители семейств million square kilometers and extends from Wrangel Ametropodidae и Acanthametropodidae. Наибольшее ви- Island (71° N) in the south to Khasan Lake (42° N) and довое разнообразие представителей семейств Potaman- from Dezhnev Cape (170° W) in the west to the thidae, Ephemeridae и Neoephemeridae отмечено в Китае, Stanovoi Range (120° E). Sakhalin Island and the Kuril Palingeniidae и Isonychiidae — на Дальнем Востоке Рос- Archipelago also belong to the Far East. In the territo- сии, Polymitarcyidae — в Японии, Heptageniidae, Ametro- podidae, Ameletidae, Siphlonuridae и Baetidae — в Ка- ry covered by the Far Eastern region, there are more наде. При этом отмечено, что, при различии числа видов than 940 thousand rivers, which account for approxi- в России и Канаде практически в два раза, удельный вес mately 30 % of all Russian rivers. The main river of ряда семейств довольно близок. Это относится к таким the region is one of the largest rivers of the world — семействам как Potamanthidae, Neoephemeridae, Metreto- the Amur River, the basin of which occupies more than podidae, Acanthametropodidae, Oligoneuridae, Caenidae. half of the Far Eastern region. Regarding the water 28 T.M. Tiunova discharge volume, the Amur River is only surpassed by the Yenisei, Lena and Ob rivers. The main tributaries in the territory of the Far East are the Zeya (1242 km), Ussuri (897 km), Amgun (723 km), Selemdza (647 km), Bureya (623 km), Bikin (560 km, tributary of the Us- suri River) and Tunguska (544 km) Rivers. The second most significant river of the Far East is the Anadyr River — the largest river in the northeast part of Rus- sia, which extends 1170 km. There are more than 470 thousand rivers at least 100 km in length in the Russian Far East, and there are approximately 460 thousand rivers at least 10 km long. Currently, more than 2 million living organisms have been discovered, that at a synonymy average level in 20 % allows the establishments to consider as the described about 1.868 million species, of which 1.450 million are terraneous organisms and 318 thou- sand are aquatic organisms [Reaka-Kudla, 1997; Adri- anov, 2003; Adrianov, Tarasov, 2006]. Among aquatic species, 90 % (274 thousand) are found in the sea, and approximately 10 % are found in freshwater (approxi- mately 40 thousand). The mayfly fauna of the world includes approximately 4.5 thousand species (insecta.bio.pu.ru/z/Eph-spp/Contents.htm). In Russia, there are approximately 250 species [Tshernova et al., 1986; Kluge, 1997], and the Russian Far East is home to 176 species [Tiunova, 2008a]. Thus, the Far Eastern mayfly fauna represents 0.4 % of all freshwater organ- isms of the World and approximately 70 % of Russian mayfly fauna. Fig. 1. Map of study area in the Far East of Russia. The level of scrutiny of mayflies in the Russian Far Ðèñ. 1. Êàðòà-ñõåìà îáñëåäîâàííîé òåððèòîðèè Äàëüíåãî East has not been sufficiently in depth. Detailed infor- Âîñòîêà Ðîññèè. mation is available for higher taxa (families) that are already included in determinants [Tshernova et al., country’s total. The greatest diversity of mayflies is 1986; Kluge, 1997]. However, even in these books, recorded from the southern part of the Russian Far only attribute tables for genera are given for some East, including the basis of the Ussuri River, Amur, families (for example, Ameletidae, Siphlonuridae, Iso- and the Sea of Japan [Tiunova, 2008a]. nychiidae), and data on species composition are absent The Ussuri River is one of the biggest tributaries of because of a low level of scrutiny [Kluge, 1997]. There- the Amur River, running for 897 km. From a point of fore, it was practically impossible to estimate a satura- confluence with the Sungacha River up to its mouth, tion species of typical biotopes of river ecosystems of the Ussuri River forms the boundary with China. different regions of the Russian Far East in the absence We surveyed the basic tributaries of the Ussuri River, of species lists of local faunas. Therefore, since 1987, large rivers and its tributaries including Bolshaya Us- the author has surveyed more than 300 rivers and surka (440 km), Bikin (560 km), Khor (453 km), and a streams across all of the territories of the southern part series of smaller streams (Kabarga, Malinovka, Shivki, of the Russian Far East (Fig. 1). These data provide the Kiya, and others). In its basin, 119 species are found, chance to investigate the taxonomy of mayfly fauna in that is about 67 % of the entire mayfly fauna of the Far the Russian Far East and its individual regions [Kocha- East of Russia. The faunal list of mayflies includes 85 rina et al., 2003; Tiunova et al., 2003; Tiunova, Po- species for the Ussuri River, 72 for the Bolshaya Us- tikha, 2005; Tiunova, Tiunov, 2007, 2010; Tiunova, surka River, 77 for the Bikin River, and 63 species for 2009; Tiunova, Gorovaya, 2011]. the Khor River [Tiunova, 1995a, 2007a, 2008a; Tiu- nova et al., 1997]. Results and discussion Another region equally rich in mayfly diversity is the Amur River basin up to the border with the Chitin- The mayfly fauna of the Russian Far East currently skaya oblast. Here, 121 species, or 69 % of the Russian includes 176 species from 39 genera and 18 families Far East mayfly fauna, are found. Our investigation (Table 1), or 70 % of the total number of species followed the largest tributaries of the Amur River, the known in Russia [Tshernova et al., 1986; Kluge, 1997; Anui, Gur, Yai, Amgun’, Bureya, Zeya, Arkhara, Tiunova, 2007a, 2008a], despite of the fact that the Bolshoi Ol’doi, Amasar, Bira, and Bidzhan, and in- area of the Far East of Russia is only 18 % of the cluded streams of the Evreiskaya Avtonomnaya Ob- Mayfly biodiversity of the Russian Far East 29 Table 1. List of mayflies (Ephemeroptera) of the Russian Table 1. (continuation) Far East and their distribution patterns Òàáëèöà 1. (ïðîäîëæåíèå) Òàáëèöà 1. Ñïèñîê ïîä¸íîê (Ephemeroptera) Äàëüíåãî Âîñòîêà Ðîññèè è òèïû èõ àðåàëîâ Species Distribution 39. Ecdyonurus levis (Navas, 1912) EP Species Distribution 40. E. scalaris Kluge, 1983 EAc Potamanthidae 41. E. simplicioides (McDunnough, 1924) AP 1. Potamanthus formosus Eaton, 1892 EAci 42. E. rubromaculatus You, Wu, Gui et Hsu, 1981 EAc 2. P. luteus oriens Bae et McCafferty, 1991 EP 43. E. yoshidae Takahashi, 1924 EAci 3. Rhoenanthus coreanus Yoon et Bae, 1985 EAc 44. E. vicinus (Demoulin, 1964) EP Ephemeridae 45. Epeorus anatolii Sinitshenkova, 1981 EP 4. Ephemera japonica McLachlan, 1875 EAci 46. E.
Recommended publications
  • (Hymenoptera, Symphyta) Большехехцирского Заповедника С
    Амурский зоологический журнал, 2019, том XI, № 1 Amurian Zoological Journal, 2019, vol. XI, no. 1 www.azjournal.ru УДК 595.793 DOI: 10.33910/1999-4079-2019-11-1-72-77 http://www.zoobank.org/References/3BCBB470-E17E-4207-9DA4-F6529D369A52 ДОПОЛНЕНИЯ И ИСПРАВЛЕНИЯ К СПИСКУ ПИЛИЛЬЩИКОВ (HYMENOPTERA, SYMPHYTA) БОЛЬШЕХЕХЦИРСКОГО ЗАПОВЕДНИКА С. В. Василенко Институт систематики и экологии животных Сибирского отделения РАН, ул. Фрунзе, д. 11, Новосибирск, 630091, Россия Сведения об авторе Аннотация. Приводится 16 видов пилильщиков. Среди них 13 видов ранее Василенко Сергей Владимирович не отмечались на территории Большехехцирского заповедника. Acantholyda E-mail: [email protected] parki Shinohara et Byun, 1996, Arge disparilis (Kirby, 1882), A. flavomixta (André, SPIN-код: 9176-8171 1881), A. nigrovaginata Malaise, 1931, Strongylogaster empriaeformis (Malaise, 1931), Macrophya sanguinolenta (Gmelin, 1790), M. vacillans Malaise, 1931, Rhogogaster chlorosoma (Benson, 1943) и R. sibirica Enslin, 1912 впервые обнаружены в Хабаровском крае. A. hasegawae Takeuchi, 1927 впервые найден в Хабаровском крае и на о-ве Кунашир. Обсуждаются некоторые проблемы, связанные с сибирскими и дальневосточными видами рода Rhogogaster Konow, 1884. Ключевые слова: пилильщики, новые находки, Большехехцирский заповедник, Дальний Восток. AMENDMENTS TO THE LIST OF SAWFLIES (HYMENOPTERA, SYMPHYTA) OF THE BOLSHEKHEKHTSIRSKII RESERVE S. V. Vasilenko Institute of Animal Systematics and Ecology, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 11 Frunze Str., Novosibirsk, 630091, Russia Author Abstract. The paper lists 16 species of sawflies of which 13 species were Sergey V. Vasilenko discovered on the territory of the Bolshekhekhtsirskii reserve for the first E-mail: [email protected] time. Acantholyda parki Shinohara et Byun, 1996, Arge disparilis (Kirby, SPIN: 9176-8171 1882), A.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 4: EPHEMEROPTERA (Mayflies)
    Guide to Aquatic Invertebrate Families of Mongolia | 2009 CHAPTER 4 EPHEMEROPTERA (Mayflies) EPHEMEROPTERA Draft June 17, 2009 Chapter 4 | EPHEMEROPTERA 45 Guide to Aquatic Invertebrate Families of Mongolia | 2009 ORDER EPHEMEROPTERA Mayflies 4 Mayfly larvae are found in a variety of locations including lakes, wetlands, streams, and rivers, but they are most common and diverse in lotic habitats. They are common and abundant in stream riffles and pools, at lake margins and in some cases lake bottoms. All mayfly larvae are aquatic with terrestrial adults. In most mayfly species the adult only lives for 1-2 days. Consequently, the majority of a mayfly’s life is spent in the water as a larva. The adult lifespan is so short there is no need for the insect to feed and therefore the adult does not possess functional mouthparts. Mayflies are often an indicator of good water quality because most mayflies are relatively intolerant of pollution. Mayflies are also an important food source for fish. Ephemeroptera Morphology Most mayflies have three caudal filaments (tails) (Figure 4.1) although in some taxa the terminal filament (middle tail) is greatly reduced and there appear to be only two caudal filaments (only one genus actually lacks the terminal filament). Mayflies have gills on the dorsal surface of the abdomen (Figure 4.1), but the number and shape of these gills vary widely between taxa. All mayflies possess only one tarsal claw at the end of each leg (Figure 4.1). Characters such as gill shape, gill position, and tarsal claw shape are used to separate different mayfly families.
    [Show full text]
  • RCN #33 21/8/03 13:57 Page 1
    RCN #33 21/8/03 13:57 Page 1 No. 33 Summer 2003 Special issue: The Transformation of Protected Areas in Russia A Ten-Year Review PROMOTING BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION IN RUSSIA AND THROUGHOUT NORTHERN EURASIA RCN #33 21/8/03 13:57 Page 2 CONTENTS CONTENTS Voice from the Wild (Letter from the Editors)......................................1 Ten Years of Teaching and Learning in Bolshaya Kokshaga Zapovednik ...............................................................24 BY WAY OF AN INTRODUCTION The Formation of Regional Associations A Brief History of Modern Russian Nature Reserves..........................2 of Protected Areas........................................................................................................27 A Glossary of Russian Protected Areas...........................................................3 The Growth of Regional Nature Protection: A Case Study from the Orlovskaya Oblast ..............................................29 THE PAST TEN YEARS: Making Friends beyond Boundaries.............................................................30 TRENDS AND CASE STUDIES A Spotlight on Kerzhensky Zapovednik...................................................32 Geographic Development ........................................................................................5 Ecotourism in Protected Areas: Problems and Possibilities......34 Legal Developments in Nature Protection.................................................7 A LOOK TO THE FUTURE Financing Zapovedniks ...........................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1 Plant Genera Eaten by Ungulates (Wi, Winter; Sp, Spring; Su, Summer; Au,Autumn)
    Appendix 1 Plant Genera Eaten by Ungulates (Wi, winter; Sp, spring; Su, summer; Au,autumn) Table 1. Plant genera eaten by Equus hemionus' Plant genera Locality" Badkhyz Nature Reserve! Barsakelmes Qapshaghay Game Island / Husbandry' (Seasons) Wi Sp Su Acanthophyllum +++ r ++ Acroptilon + Aegilops r ++ +++ Aeluropus r +++ Agropyron +++ Alhagi ++ ++ r ++ Allium +++ Amberboa +++ Anabasis +++ +++ Aphanopleura ++ Arabis + Aristida + Arnebia +++ +++ r Artemisia +++ +++ Astragalus +++ ++ + Atraphaxis r + + Atriplex ++ +++ Bongardia ++ Bromus +++ +++ +++ + ++ Bunium +++ Calamagrostis + Calligonum ++ ++ Caragana + ++ Cardaria ++ Carex +++ +++ +++ +++ Carthamnus ++ Centaurea ++ Ceratocarpus +++ Chorispora + Convolvulus +++ Cousinia +++ ++ r Crypsis ++ Delphinium +++ Table 1. Continued Plant genera Locality'' Badkhyz Nature Reserve' Barsakelmes Qapshaghay Game Island/ Husbandr y' (Seasons) Wi Sp Su Elymus + Ephedra ++ Eremopyrum +++ ++ +++ + Eremostachys r +++ Erodium ++ Euclidium + Eurotia +++ Ferula ++ ++ ++ Filipendula ++ Frankenia ++ Halocnemum +++ ++ Haloxylo n ++ +++ + Hordeum ++ +++ ++ Isatis +++ r Ixiolirion +++ Kochia + Lagonychium ++ Lepidium +++ Leptale um +++ Limonium +++ r + Lycium + Malcolmia ++ r ++ Medicago +++ Mentha +++ Nitraria ++ Onobrych is +++ Papaver ++ Phragmites + +++ Pistacia ++ Poa +++ +++ +++ +++ Psoralea ++ Ranunculus +++ Rheum + Roemeria ++ Rosa + Salsola +++ r + +++ Schismus ++ r Scorzonera +++ Secale ++ Sisy mbrium +++ Sorghum +++ Sphenopus r ++ Stipa ++ r + +++ Tamarix ++ r ++ + Tanacetum +++ ' Symbols indicate %
    [Show full text]
  • Systematic and Biogeographical Study of Protura (Hexapoda) in Russian Far East: New Data on High Endemism of the Group
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 424:Systematic 19–57 (2014) and biogeographical study of Protura (Hexapoda) in Russian Far East... 19 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.424.7388 RESEARCH ARTICLE www.zookeys.org Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Systematic and biogeographical study of Protura (Hexapoda) in Russian Far East: new data on high endemism of the group Yun Bu1, Mikhail B. Potapov2, Wen Ying Yin1 1 Institute of Plant Physiology and Ecology, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200032 China 2 Moscow State Pedagogical University, Kibalchich str., 6, korp. 5, Moscow, 129278 Russia Corresponding author: Yun Bu ([email protected]) Academic editor: L. Deharveng | Received 4 March 2014 | Accepted 4 June 2014 | Published 8 July 2014 http://zoobank.org/38EAC4B7-8834-4054-B9AC-9747AC476543 Citation: Bu Y, Potapov MB, Yin WY (2014) Systematic and biogeographical study of Protura (Hexapoda) in Russian Far East: new data on high endemism of the group. ZooKeys 424: 19–57. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.424.7388 Abstract Proturan collections from Magadan Oblast, Khabarovsk Krai, Primorsky Krai, and Sakhalin Oblast are re- ported here. Twenty-five species are found of which 13 species are new records for Russian Far East which enrich the knowledge of Protura known for this area. Three new species Baculentulus krabbensis sp. n., Fjellbergella lazovskiensis sp. n. and Yichunentulus alpatovi sp. n. are illustrated and described. The new materials of Imadateiella sharovi (Martynova, 1977) are studied and described in details. Two new combi- nations, Yichunentulus borealis (Nakamura, 2004), comb. n. and Fjellbergella jilinensis (Wu & Yin, 2007), comb.
    [Show full text]
  • Entomological News
    Vol. 109, No. 3, May & June, 1998 213 SCIENTIFIC NOTE: NEW DISTRIBUTIONS FOR RAPTOHEPTAGENIA CRUENTATA AND AMETROPUS NEAVEI (EPHEMEROPTERA: HEPTAGENIIDAE, AMETROPODIDAE)! 2 4 R.D. Waltz, G. F. Edmunds, Jr?, Gary Lester Large river habitats possess some of the least known mayfly species in North America (McCafferty et al. 1990). Difficulty in sampling such habitats has undoubtedly contributed to the report of widely disjunct distributions of large river species. Decline in the quality of large river habitat has also possibly contributed to localized extirpations and further increased the apparent disjunction of reported distributions (see Whiting and Lehmkuhl 1987, McCafferty et al. 1990). Herein, two large river species, which are rarely collected, are newly reported from Montana. One of these two species is also newly reported from Minnesota. Raptoheptagenia cruentata (Walsh) has been reported previously from nine states or prov- inces in North America based on available literature (see Whiting and Lehmkuhl 1987, Edmunds and Waltz 1995). Reports of larval collections cited in the preceding papers include Arkansas, Illinois, Indiana, Montana, Ohio, and Saskatchewan. McCafferty (1988) designated the neotype of R. cruentata based on a larva in Indiana, which is housed in the Purdue Entomological Re- search Collection (PERC), West Lafayette, IN. Adult collections have been reported from Illi- nois, Indiana, Nebraska, Tennessee, and Manitoba. Two R. cruentata larvae taken in the Powder River, by G. Romero, with the following col- lection data: MT: Custer Co., Powder R., 11 -XI- 1976(1 larva), and same locale, 11 -VIII -1976 (2 larvae) were the source of the previously unpublished Montana record reported by Edmunds and Waltz (1995).
    [Show full text]
  • New Jersey Amber Mayflies: the First North American Mesozoic Members of the Order (Insecta; Ephemeroptera)
    New Jersey amber mayflies: the first North American Mesozoic members of the order (Insecta; Ephemeroptera) Nina D. Sinitshenkova Paleontological Institute ofthe Russian Academy ofSciences, Profioyuznaya Street 123, Moscow 117647, Russia Abstract The following new genera and species of mayflies are described from Upper Cretaceous (Turonian) amber from Sayreville, New Jersey, U.S.A: Cretomitarcys lu=ii (imago male), (Polymitarcyidae: Cretomitarcyinae, new subfamily), Borephemera goldmani (imago male, Australiphemeridae), Amerogenia macrops (imago female) (Heptageniidae) and Palaeometropus cassus (subadult male) (Ametropodidae). Previously no mayflies were described from the Mesozoic of North America. Ametropodidae and Heptageniidae are newly recorded for the Mesozoic, and Australiphemeridae for the Upper Cretaceous. The mayflies in this amber probably inhabited a medium-sized or large river. Zoogeography of Upper Cretaceous mayflies is briefly discussed; with particular emphasis on significant faunistic differences between the temperate and subtropical areas. Introduction often abundant in drift of modern rivers, lotic nymphs seem to be very rare in the fossil record Through the kindness of Dr. D. Grimaldi like other insects inhabiting running waters (Department of Entomology, American Museum (Zherikhin, 1980; Sinitshenkova, 1987). The of Natural History, New York) I have had an alate mayflies are extremely short-lived, and the opportunity to examine five mayfly specimens probability is quite low of an occasional burial for found among a large collection of fossil insects the flying stages of a lotic species in lake sedi­ enclosed in Late Cretaceous amber of New Jersey. ments. Thus, probably the largest part of past This material is interesting and important in sev­ mayfly diversity became lost as a result of eral respects.
    [Show full text]
  • Fossil Calibrations for the Arthropod Tree of Life
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/044859; this version posted June 10, 2016. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. FOSSIL CALIBRATIONS FOR THE ARTHROPOD TREE OF LIFE AUTHORS Joanna M. Wolfe1*, Allison C. Daley2,3, David A. Legg3, Gregory D. Edgecombe4 1 Department of Earth, Atmospheric & Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA 2 Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK 3 Oxford University Museum of Natural History, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PZ, UK 4 Department of Earth Sciences, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK *Corresponding author: [email protected] ABSTRACT Fossil age data and molecular sequences are increasingly combined to establish a timescale for the Tree of Life. Arthropods, as the most species-rich and morphologically disparate animal phylum, have received substantial attention, particularly with regard to questions such as the timing of habitat shifts (e.g. terrestrialisation), genome evolution (e.g. gene family duplication and functional evolution), origins of novel characters and behaviours (e.g. wings and flight, venom, silk), biogeography, rate of diversification (e.g. Cambrian explosion, insect coevolution with angiosperms, evolution of crab body plans), and the evolution of arthropod microbiomes. We present herein a series of rigorously vetted calibration fossils for arthropod evolutionary history, taking into account recently published guidelines for best practice in fossil calibration.
    [Show full text]
  • A Revision of the V Leptophlebiidae of the ¥ West Indies (Ephemeroptera)
    WILLIAM L. PETE A Revision of the V Leptophlebiidae of the ¥ West Indies (Ephemeroptera) SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ZOOLOGY NUMBER 62 SERIAL PUBLICATIONS OF THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION The emphasis upon publications as a means of diffusing knowledge was expressed by the first Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution. In his formal plan for the Insti- tution, Joseph Henry articulated a program that included the following statement: "It is proposed to publish a series of reports, giving an account of the new discoveries in science, and of the changes made from year to year in all branches of knowledge not strictly professional." This keynote of basic research has been adhered to over the years in the issuance of thousands of titles in serial publications under the Smithsonian imprint, commencing with Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge in 1848 and continuing with the following active series: Smithsonian Annals of Flight Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology Smithsonian Contributions to Astrophysics Smithsonian Contributions to Botany Smithsonian Contributions to the Earth Sciences Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology Smithsonian Contributions to Z0°l°gy Smithsonian Studies in History and Technology In these series, the Institution publishes original articles and monographs dealing with the research and collections of its several museums and offices and of professional colleagues at other institutions of learning. These papers report newly acquired facts, synoptic interpretations of data, or original theory in specialized fields. Each publica- tion is distributed by mailing lists to libraries, laboratories, institutes, and interested specialists throughout the world. Individual copies may be obtained from the Smith- sonian Institution Press as long as stocks are available.
    [Show full text]
  • Securing a Future for Amur Leopards and Tigers in Russia
    Securing a Future for Amur Leopards and Tigers in Russia – VI 2018 Final Report Phoenix Fund 1 Securing a Future for Amur Leopards and Tigers in Russia – VI • 2018 Final Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Background ................................................................................................................................................... 2 Project Summary ........................................................................................................................................... 3 Project Activities............................................................................................................................................ 4 SMART in five protected areas .................................................................................................................. 4 Annual workshop for educators ................................................................................................................ 8 Education in Khasan, Lazo, Terney and Vladivostok ................................................................................. 9 Tiger Day in Primorye .............................................................................................................................. 11 Art Contest .............................................................................................................................................. 13 Photo credits: PRNCO “Tiger “Centre”, Far Eastern Operational Customs Office, Land of the Leopard National Park, Alexander Ratnikov, and children's paintings
    [Show full text]
  • ALTA Conservation Update
    ALTA Conservation Update Amur Leopard and Tiger Alliance September 2007 Contributions by: • Tanya Arzhanova (Moscow Zoo) • Sergei Bereznuk (Phoenix Fund) • Martha Caron (Minnesota Zoo) • Sarah Christie (ZSL) • Michiel Hötte (ZSL / Tigris Foundation) • Anna Filippova, Masha Vorontsova and Maria Scherbacheva (IFAW) • Linda Kerley (Lazovsky Nature Reserve / WCS) • Sharon Miller (AMUR UK) and Katya Newman (AMUR Russia) • Dale Miquelle (WCS) ALTA contact person: Michiel Hötte, [email protected] New format for ALTA Conservation Updates The ALTA Conservation Update has a new format. From now on you will find our tiger, leopard and general news items in separate sections. Tigris Foundation will no longer distribute a separate Amur leopard newsletters. Instead, information about Amur leopards will be provided in the ALTA Conservation Updates. Topics: General 1. AMUR – Activities in late 2006 and early 2007 (Sharon Miller and Katya Newman) 2. Successful ALTA lobby in Moscow (Sharon Miller and Masha Vorontsova) Amur Tiger News 3. The International Tiger Coalition (ITC) and tiger trade in China (Sarah Christie) 4. Orphaned tiger cubs rescued (Anna Filippova and Masha Vorontsova) Amur Leopard News 5. Young female Amur leopard killed (Sergei Bereznuk) 6. Monitoring Far Eastern Leopards with Camera Traps (Dale Miquelle) 7. Medical and Genetic Assessments of wild Far Eastern Leopards (Dale Miquelle) 8. Amur leopard scat collection with dogs (Linda Kerley) 9. 2007 Winter Leopard Survey (Dale Miquelle) 10. Amur leopard reintroduction plan (Dale Miquelle) 11. North American Amur Leopard Population Management Plan (PMP) update (Martha Caron) 12. Amur Leopard EEP (European zoo breeding programme) update (Sarah Christie and Tanya Arzhanova) 1 Documents and information on Internet - Campaign against tiger trafficking (documents and films) available at www.tigrisfoundation.nl and www.endtigertrade.org - The Tiger Count 2005 final report is finally available.
    [Show full text]
  • Биота И Среда Заповедных Территорий Issn 2618-6764 Научный Рецензируемый Журнал 2019, № 2 Журнал Основан В 2013 Году, Издаётся С 2014 Года
    БИОТА И СРЕДА ЗАПОВЕДНЫХ ТЕРРИТОРИЙ ISSN 2618-6764 НАУЧНЫЙ РЕЦЕНЗИРУЕМЫЙ ЖУРНАЛ 2019, № 2 Журнал основан в 2013 году, издаётся с 2014 года. В 2014–2017 годах именовался «Биота и среда заповедников Дальнего Востока» (Biodiversity and Environment of Far East Reserves), ISSN 2227-149X. Учредители: Дальневосточное отделение Российской академии наук и Дальневосточный морской заповедник — филиал Национального научного центра морской биологии им. А. В. Жирмунского Дальневосточного отделения Российской академии наук. Редколлегия: главный редактор — Богатов Виктор Всеволодович, член-корр. РАН, д-р биол. наук, проф., Дальневосточное отделение РАН (ДВО РАН), Владивосток; зам. главного редактора — Дроздов Анатолий Леонидович, д-р биол. наук, проф., Национальный научный центр морской биологии им. А. В. Жирмунского ДВО РАН (ННЦМБ ДВО РАН), Владивосток; отв. секретарь редколлегии, и. о. зав редакцией — Тюрин Алексей Николаевич, канд. биол. наук, Дальне- восточный морской заповедник — филиал ННЦМБ ДВО РАН; Богачева Анна Вениаминовна, д-р биол. наук, Федеральный научный центр биоразнообразия наземной биоты Восточной Азии ДВО РАН (ФНЦ Биоразнообразия ДВО РАН), Владивосток; Боркин Лев Яковлевич, канд. биол. наук, Зоологический институт РАН (ЗИН РАН), Санкт-Петербург; Глущенко Юрий Николаевич, канд. биол. наук, проф., Дальневосточный федеральный университет (ДВФУ), филиал, Уссурийск; Дьякова Ольга Васильевна, д-р ист. наук, проф., Институт истории, археологии и этнографии народов Дальнего Востока ДВО РАН (ИИАЭ ДВО РАН), Владивосток; Ильин Игорь Николаевич, д-р биол. наук, Институт проблем экологии и эволюции им. А. Н. Северцова РАН, Москва; Прозорова Лариса Аркадьевна, канд. биол. наук, Федеральный научный центр биоразнообразия наземной биоты Восточной Азии ДВО РАН (ФНЦ Биоразнообразия ДВО РАН), Владивосток; Пушкарь Владимир Степанович, д-р геогр. наук, проф., Дальневосточный геологический институт ДВО РАН (ДВГИ ДВО РАН), Владивосток; Пшеничников Борис Фёдорович, д-р биол.
    [Show full text]