Official Journal L108
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Curriculum Vitae
Tayeb Hassabo NAME: Eltayeb Hassab Elrasoul (Tayeb Hassabo) PERSONAL INFORMATION Date of Birth: 1st July 1961 Citizenship: Sudanese EDUCATION: Institution Degree(s) or Diplomas obtained Date obtained University of Khartoum LLB 1986 OTHER TRAINING 1986 – 1989: Trainee lawyer at the Law Office of Advocate Kamal Khalil, Khartoum, The Republic of Sudan. Employment Record: Period Employer Position held and duties 2005-present Aztan Law Firm Managing Partner Being specialized in business laws, corporate matters and arbitration, I advised a considerable number of companies on issues that relate to their business and corporate matters, vetted and drafted loans and financial agreements (for instance, five finance transactions between 2008-2013 for a total amount of USD1.1 billion), handling Tayeb CV Tayeb Hassabo | 1 Tayeb Hassabo Period Employer Position held and duties restructure of capital by issuance and registration of preference shares and registering the same, drafting and registering pledge and mortgage agreements as securities for the aforesaid amount, drafting of corporate governance principles, registration of security agreements, agriculture agreements, escrow agreements, infra-structure transactions, international procurement agreements, arbitrator in local and international disputes, telecommunication projects, distribution and agency agreements, acquisition and merger of companies, and deeply involved in litigation and local and international arbitration. As domestic and international arbitrator, was appointed as arbitrator in many cases (most recent was a case in which we, as tribunal, awarded the Plaintiffs US$ 37 million). As counsel, represented a considerable number of local and international clients (in Sudan, the United Arab Emirates, Kenya and South Sudan). In one of the cases where we were Tayeb CV Tayeb Hassabo | 2 Tayeb Hassabo Period Employer Position held and duties collaborating with an American firm, we managed to get to our client an award of US$ 43 million. -
Nr 659/2013, 10. Juuli 2013, Millega Muudetakse Määrust
L 190/54 ET Euroopa Liidu Teataja 11.7.2013 KOMISJONI RAKENDUSMÄÄRUS (EL) nr 659/2013, 10. juuli 2013, millega muudetakse määrust (EÜ) nr 474/2006, millega kehtestatakse ühenduse nimekiri lennuettevõtjatest, kelle suhtes kohaldatakse ühenduse piires tegevuskeeldu (EMPs kohaldatav tekst) EUROOPA KOMISJON, biigi ja Nepali pädevate asutuste ja lennuettevõtjatega. Peale selle on lennuohutuskomitee saanud komisjonilt ajakohast teavet ka Venemaa Föderatsiooniga peetavate võttes arvesse Euroopa Liidu toimimise lepingut, tehniliste konsultatsioonide ning Boliivia, Tadžikistani ja Türkmenistani jälgimise kohta. võttes arvesse Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu 14. detsembri 2005. aasta määrust (EÜ) nr 2111/2005, mis käsitleb ühenduse nimekirja, millesse kantakse lennuettevõtjad, kelle suhtes kohal datakse ühenduse piires tegevuskeeldu, koostamist ja lennureisi jate teavitamist lendu teenindavast lennuettevõtjast ning millega (6) Lennuohutuskomitee kuulas ära EASA ettekanded, milles 1 tunnistatakse kehtetuks direktiivi 2004/36/EÜ artikkel 9, ( ) eriti analüüsiti Rahvusvahelise Tsiviillennunduse Organisat 2 selle artiklit 4, ( ) siooni (ICAO) poolt ohutusjärelevalve üldise auditikava (USOAP) raames tehtud auditiaruannete tulemusi. Liik ning arvestades järgmist: mesriike kutsuti üles seadma prioriteediks sellistes riikides litsentsitud lennuettevõtjate õhusõidukite kontrollimist seisuplatsil, mille puhul ICAO on tuvastanud olulise (1) Komisjoni 22. märtsi 2006. aasta määrusega (EÜ) nr ohutusprobleemi või mille ohutusjärelevalvesüsteemis 474/2006 ( -
Vote:006 Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Vote Performance Report Financial Year 2017/18 Vote:006 Ministry of Foreign Affairs QUARTER 4: Highlights of Vote Performance V1: Summary of Issues in Budget Execution Table V1.1: Overview of Vote Expenditures (UShs Billion) Approved Cashlimits Released Spent by % Budget % Budget % Releases Budget by End Q4 by End Q 4 End Q4 Released Spent Spent Recurrent Wage 4.849 4.849 5.519 5.435 113.8% 112.1% 98.5% Non Wage 25.429 50.615 50.597 48.100 199.0% 189.2% 95.1% Devt. GoU 0.713 0.713 0.713 0.712 100.0% 99.9% 99.9% Ext. Fin. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% GoU Total 30.991 56.178 56.830 54.246 183.4% 175.0% 95.5% Total GoU+Ext Fin 30.991 56.178 56.830 54.246 183.4% 175.0% 95.5% (MTEF) Arrears 0.720 0.720 0.666 0.695 92.6% 96.6% 104.4% Total Budget 31.711 56.897 57.496 54.942 181.3% 173.3% 95.6% A.I.A Total 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Grand Total 31.711 56.897 57.496 54.942 181.3% 173.3% 95.6% Total Vote Budget 30.991 56.178 56.830 54.246 183.4% 175.0% 95.5% Excluding Arrears Table V1.2: Releases and Expenditure by Program* Billion Uganda Shillings Approved Released Spent % Budget % Budget %Releases Budget Released Spent Spent Program: 1605 Regional and International Economic Affairs 2.10 2.10 2.10 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Program: 1606 Regional and International Political Affairs 1.16 1.16 1.17 100.3% 100.6% 100.3% Program: 1622 Protocol and Public Diplomacy 0.65 0.65 0.66 100.0% 100.5% 100.5% Program: 1649 Policy, Planning and Support Services 27.08 52.92 50.33 195.4% 185.8% 95.1% Total for Vote 30.99 56.83 54.25 183.4% 175.0% 95.5% Matters to note in budget execution During the FY 2017/18 budget execution, the Ministry received supplementary funding of; 1. -
Boating on the Nile
United Nations Mission September 2010 InSUDAN Boating on the Nile Published by UNMIS Public Information Office INSIDE 8 August: Meeting with Minister of Humanitarian Affairs Mutrif Siddiq, Joint Special Representative for Darfur 3 Special Focus: Transport Ibrahim Gambari expressed regrets on behalf of the • On every corner Diary African Union-UN Mission in Darfur (UNAMID) over • Boating on the Nile recent events in Kalma and Hamadiya internally displaced persons (IDP) camps in • Once a lifeline South Darfur and their possible negative impacts on the future of the peace process. • Keeping roads open • Filling southern skies 9 August: Blue Nile State members of the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement (SPLM) and National Congress Party (NCP) formed a six-member parliamentary committee charged with raising awareness about popular consultations on Comprehensive Peace Agreement 10 Photo gallery implementation in the state. The Sufi way 10 August: The SPLM and NCP began pre-referendum talks on wealth and power-sharing, 12 Profile demarcating the border, defining citizenship and sharing the Nile waters in preparation for the Knowledge as food southern self-determination vote, scheduled for 9 January 2011. 14 August: Two Jordanian police advisors with UNAMID were abducted in Nyala, Southern Darfur, 13 Environment as they were walking to a UNAMID transport dispatch point 100 meters from their residence. Reclaiming the trees Three days later the two police advisors were released unharmed in Kass, Southern Darfur. 14 Communications 16 August: Members of the Southern Sudan Human Rights Commission elected a nine-member The voice of Miraya steering committee to oversee its activities as the region approaches the self-determination referendum three days later the two police advisor were released unharmed in Kass, Southern Darfur. -
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No
Status: This is the original version (as it was originally adopted). Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1318/2014 of 11 December 2014 amending Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 establishing the Community list of air carriers which are subject to an operating ban within the Community (Text with EEA relevance) COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 1318/2014 of 11 December 2014 amending Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 establishing the Community list of air carriers which are subject to an operating ban within the Community (Text with EEA relevance) THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005 of the European Parliament and the Council of 14 December 2005 on the establishment of a Community list of air carriers subject to an operating ban within the Community and on informing air passengers of the identity of the operating carrier, and repealing Article 9 of Directive 2004/36/CE(1), and in particular Article 4(2) thereof, Whereas: (1) Commission Regulation (EC) No 474/2006(2) established the Community list of air carriers which are subject to an operating ban within the Union, referred to in Chapter II of Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005. (2) In accordance with Article 4(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005, some Member States and the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) communicated to the Commission information that is relevant in the context of updating that list. Relevant information was also communicated by certain third countries. On the basis of that information, the Community list should be updated. -
Capsca-Mid/6-Summary Report International Civil
CAPSCA-MID/6-SUMMARY REPORT INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ORGANIZATION COLLABORATIVE ARRANGEMENT FOR THE PREVENTION AND MANAGEMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH EVENTS IN CIVIL AVIATION (CAPSCA) SUMMARY REPORT SIXTH MEETING OF THE CAPSCA-MIDDLE EAST PROJECT (CAPSCA-MID/6) (Khartoum, Sudan 20-22 February 2017) The views expressed in this report should be taken as those of the Collaborative Arrangement For The Prevention And Management Of Public Health Events In Civil Aviation (CAPSCA) Project and not of the Organization. This Report will, however, be submitted to the ICAO Council and any formal action taken will be published in due course as a Supplement to the Report. Approved by the Meeting and published by authority of the Secretary General The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of ICAO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontier or boundaries. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. Place and Duration ........................................................................................................ 1 2. Opening ......................................................................................................................... 1 3. Attendance ..................................................................................................................... 2 4. Officers and Secretariat ................................................................................................ -
Vote:006 Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Vote Performance Report Financial Year 2017/18 Vote:006 Ministry of Foreign Affairs QUARTER 2: Highlights of Vote Performance V1: Summary of Issues in Budget Execution Table V1.1: Overview of Vote Expenditures (UShs Billion) Approved Cashlimits Released Spent by % Budget % Budget % Releases Budget by End Q2 by End Q 2 End Q2 Released Spent Spent Recurrent Wage 4.849 2.425 2.425 2.289 50.0% 47.2% 94.4% Non Wage 25.429 37.412 37.394 34.572 147.1% 136.0% 92.5% Devt. GoU 0.713 0.639 0.639 0.031 89.6% 4.3% 4.8% Ext. Fin. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% GoU Total 30.991 40.475 40.457 36.892 130.5% 119.0% 91.2% Total GoU+Ext Fin 30.991 40.475 40.457 36.892 130.5% 119.0% 91.2% (MTEF) Arrears 0.720 0.720 0.666 0.128 92.6% 17.8% 19.2% Total Budget 31.711 41.195 41.123 37.020 129.7% 116.7% 90.0% A.I.A Total 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Grand Total 31.711 41.195 41.123 37.020 129.7% 116.7% 90.0% Total Vote Budget 30.991 40.475 40.457 36.892 130.5% 119.0% 91.2% Excluding Arrears Table V1.2: Releases and Expenditure by Program* Billion Uganda Shillings Approved Released Spent % Budget % Budget %Releases Budget Released Spent Spent Program: 1605 Regional and International Economic Affairs 2.10 1.05 0.46 49.9% 22.0% 44.1% Program: 1606 Regional and International Political Affairs 1.16 0.61 0.58 52.4% 50.2% 95.7% Program: 1622 Protocol and Public Diplomacy 0.65 0.33 0.31 50.0% 47.0% 94.0% Program: 1649 Policy, Planning and Support Services 27.08 38.48 35.54 142.1% 131.2% 92.4% Total for Vote 30.99 40.46 36.89 130.5% 119.0% 91.2% Matters to note in budget execution By the end of Quarter two FY 2017/18, the Ministry had received 50% and 89.6% of its Approved Wage and Development Budget respectively. -
Airliner Census Western-Built Jet and Turboprop Airliners
World airliner census Western-built jet and turboprop airliners AEROSPATIALE (NORD) 262 7 Lufthansa (600R) 2 Biman Bangladesh Airlines (300) 4 Tarom (300) 2 Africa 3 MNG Airlines (B4) 2 China Eastern Airlines (200) 3 Turkish Airlines (THY) (200) 1 Equatorial Int’l Airlines (A) 1 MNG Airlines (B4 Freighter) 5 Emirates (300) 1 Turkish Airlines (THY) (300) 5 Int’l Trans Air Business (A) 1 MNG Airlines (F4) 3 Emirates (300F) 3 Turkish Airlines (THY) (300F) 1 Trans Service Airlift (B) 1 Monarch Airlines (600R) 4 Iran Air (200) 6 Uzbekistan Airways (300) 3 North/South America 4 Olympic Airlines (600R) 1 Iran Air (300) 2 White (300) 1 Aerolineas Sosa (A) 3 Onur Air (600R) 6 Iraqi Airways (300) (5) North/South America 81 RACSA (A) 1 Onur Air (B2) 1 Jordan Aviation (200) 1 Aerolineas Argentinas (300) 2 AEROSPATIALE (SUD) CARAVELLE 2 Onur Air (B4) 5 Jordan Aviation (300) 1 Air Transat (300) 11 Europe 2 Pan Air (B4 Freighter) 2 Kuwait Airways (300) 4 FedEx Express (200F) 49 WaltAir (10B) 1 Saga Airlines (B2) 1 Mahan Air (300) 2 FedEx Express (300) 7 WaltAir (11R) 1 TNT Airways (B4 Freighter) 4 Miat Mongolian Airlines (300) 1 FedEx Express (300F) 12 AIRBUS A300 408 (8) North/South America 166 (7) Pakistan Int’l Airlines (300) 12 AIRBUS A318-100 30 (48) Africa 14 Aero Union (B4 Freighter) 4 Royal Jordanian (300) 4 Europe 13 (9) Egyptair (600R) 1 American Airlines (600R) 34 Royal Jordanian (300F) 2 Air France 13 (5) Egyptair (600R Freighter) 1 ASTAR Air Cargo (B4 Freighter) 6 Yemenia (300) 4 Tarom (4) Egyptair (B4 Freighter) 2 Express.net Airlines -
Western-Built Jet and Turboprop Airliners
WORLD AIRLINER CENSUS Data compiled from Flightglobal ACAS database flightglobal.com/acas EXPLANATORY NOTES The data in this census covers all commercial jet- and requirements, put into storage, and so on, and when airliners that have been temporarily removed from an turboprop-powered transport aircraft in service or on flying hours for three consecutive months are reported airline’s fleet and returned to the state may not be firm order with the world’s airlines, excluding aircraft as zero. shown as being with the airline for which they operate. that carry fewer than 14 passengers, or the equivalent The exception is where the aircraft is undergoing Russian aircraft tend to spend a long time parked in cargo. maintenance, where it will remain classified as active. before being permanently retired – much longer than The tables are in two sections, both of which have Aircraft awaiting a conversion will be shown as parked. equivalent Western aircraft – so it can be difficult to been compiled by Flightglobal ACAS research officer The region is dictated by operator base and does not establish the exact status of the “available fleet” John Wilding using Flightglobal’s ACAS database. necessarily indicate the area of operation. Options and (parked aircraft that could be returned to operation). Section one records the fleets of the Western-built letters of intent (where a firm contract has not been For more information on airliner types see our two- airliners, and the second section records the fleets of signed) are not included. Orders by, and aircraft with, part World Airliners Directory (Flight International, 27 Russian/CIS-built types. -
Black List of the Air Operators
25th June 2015 LEGAL ANNOUNCEMENT The civil air transportation authorities of each member states of the European Union may check only the aircrafts of the airlines that provide flights to and from the airports of the European Union; and due to random nature of such checks, it is not possible to check each aircraft that lands at each European Union airport. The fact that the airline is not indicated on the list of the Association does not automatically mean that such company complies with the respective safety standards. If the company that is currently indicated on the list of the Association assumes that it complies with the necessary technical standards and requirements indicated in the respective international safety standards, it might request the Committee to initiate the proceedings to withdraw it from the list. All possible effort was made to verify the exact identity of all airlines indicated on the list of the Association – particularly with regard to the following properties: specific (and unique) letter codes for each airline by the ICAO organisation of the country that has issued the certificate as well as the certificate numbers (or the operating licence) of the air transport operator. Nevertheless, the complete verification was not in all cases possible due to the general lack of information on some airlines that could be borderline with the respected international system of the air transportation or entirely inconsistent with it. For this reason we cannot exclude the fact that there might be companies that conduct their business activities in good faith under the same business name as some of the airlines indicated in the list of the Association. -
(Eu) 2015/ 2322
12.12.2015 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 328/67 COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2015/2322 of 10 December 2015 amending Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 establishing the Community list of air carriers which are subject to an operating ban within the Community (Text with EEA relevance) THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005 of the European Parliament and the Council of 14 December 2005 on the establishment of a Community list of air carriers subject to an operating ban within the Community and on informing air passengers of the identity of the operating carrier, and repealing Article 9 of Directive 2004/36/CE (1), and in particular Article 4(2) thereof, Whereas: (1) Commission Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 (2) established the Community list of air carriers which are subject to an operating ban within the Union, referred to in Chapter II of Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005. (2) In accordance with Article 4(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005, some Member States and the European Aviation Safety Agency (‘EASA’) communicated to the Commission information that is relevant in the context of updating that list. Relevant information was also communicated by certain third countries. On the basis of that information, the Community list should be updated. (3) The Commission informed all air carriers concerned, either directly or through the authorities responsible for their regulatory oversight, about the essential facts and considerations which would form the basis for a decision to impose on them an operating ban within the Union or to modify the conditions of an operating ban imposed on an air carrier which is included in the Community list. -
EU) No 659/2013 of 10 July 2013 Amending Regulation (EC
L 190/54 EN Official Journal of the European Union 11.7.2013 COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 659/2013 of 10 July 2013 amending Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 establishing the Community list of air carriers which are subject to an operating ban within the Community (Text with EEA relevance) THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION, the framework of Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005 and its implementing Regulation (EC) No 473/2006, with competent authorities and air carriers of the states of Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Curaçao & St Maarten, Republic of Guinea, India, Iran, Union, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Mozambique and Nepal. The Air Safety Committee also received updates from the Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005 of the Commission about technical consultations with the European Parliament and the Council of 14 December 2005 Russian Federation and concerning monitoring of on the establishment of a Community list of air carriers subject Bolivia, Tajikistan and Turkmenistan. to an operating ban within the Community and on informing air passengers of the identity of the operating carrier, and repealing Article 9 of Directive 2004/36/CE ( 1 ), and in particular (6) The Air Safety Committee has heard presentations by Article 4 thereof ( 2), EASA about the results of the analysis of audit reports carried out by the International Civil Aviation Organi sation ('ICAO') in the framework of ICAO’s Universal Whereas: Safety Oversight Audit Programme ('USOAP'). Member States were invited to prioritize ramp inspections on (1) Commission Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 of 22 March air carriers licensed by states in respect of which 2006 ( 3 ) established the Community list of air carriers Significant Safety Concerns ('SSC') have been identified which are subject to an operating ban within the by ICAO or in respect of which EASA concluded that Union referred to in Chapter II of Regulation (EC) No there are significant deficiencies in the safety oversight 2111/2005.