DOCSLIB.ORG

Peninsula-Delaware Conference Bishop Felton Edwin May Resource Center the United Methodist Church 139 N

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Peninsula-Delaware Conference Bishop Felton Edwin May Resource Center the United Methodist Church 139 N Peninsula-Delaware Conference Bishop Felton Edwin May Resource Center The United Methodist Church 139 N. State Street Dover, DE 19901-3834 Telephone: 302-674-2626 Toll Free: 877-736-3351 Fax: 302-674-1573 April 26, 2018 Dear Lay and Clergy Members of the 2018 Annual Conference Session, We are preparing for this year's Annual Conference; which will be held Thursday, May 31st, through Saturday, June 1st, on the University of Maryland Eastern Shore campus in Princess Anne, Maryland. The theme of this year's Annual Conference is "Leaders as Followers of the Way." This theme supports our focus on Leadership Development throughout the year, and supports the Connecting aspect of our Annual Conference Mission: Cultivating Christ communities through our CALL—Connecting, Acting, Leading, and Loving. This coming year, we will focus on the Acting aspect of our CALL. Acting focuses on encouraging engagement with the communities we serve through missions—being the Body of Christ in the world, advocacy—speaking up for those who are marginalized, impoverished, and brokenhearted throughout the world, and serving—the least, the last, and the lost. This coming year, we will focus on reaching out to those people who need Release, either from addictions, or reintegration into community as they leave prison. We will learn about churches as first responders to veterans returning to civilian life with PTSD, and we will discover how churches can work to alleviate the opioid crisis. We also hope to work on prevention measures. Next year at Annual Conference, we will review the fruit our efforts bore. Our Annual Conference theme for 2019 comes from Jesus’ mission statement in Luke 4:18: “Proclaim Release!” In our ongoing efforts to be good stewards of our resources, we have placed all of the Annual Conference materials on the website for you to download to your computer or tablet. Go to www.pen- del.org. You may review the Conference materials on your computer and save or print out the ones you would like to have on hand for Annual Conference. This process helps us save on paper, printing costs, and mailing costs. If you cannot access the materials, we recommend you request your church office to print them for you or ask for help at the local public library. We will have a very limited number of printed materials at the Pre-Conference Orientations and at the site of the Annual Conference. If you are unable to use any of the aforementioned avenues to access Conference materials and you need the Conference to provide a full set of printed material at the site of the Annual Conference, we are happy to do so upon request. Such requests must be communicated to the Conference Resource Center no later than Friday, May 11, 2018. Rev. Dr. Vicki Gordy-Stith Director of Connectional Ministries Mr. William Westbrook Director of Administrative Services Rev. Darlene M. Dixon Director for STBC/CDC Mr. Doug Lanter Communications Coordinator 234th Peninsula -Delaware Annual Conference May 31-June 2, 2018 University of Maryland Eastern Shore Princess Anne, Maryland i. TABLE OF CONTENTS i. Table of Contents ii. 2018 Annual Conference Schedule and Speaker Bios iii. Guidelines for Holy Conferencing iv. Rules and Guidelines for Clergy and Lay Leadership v. Conference Notes Conference Reports A. Committee on Clergy & Lay Leadership (DISTRIBUTED AT CONFERENCE SITE) B. CONNECTING Conference Board of Higher Education and Campus Ministries ..... B-1 Communications Commission ................................................... B-4 Commission on Archives and History ........................................ B-5 Deaf Ministries ...................................................................... B-7 Disabilities Ministry ................................................................. B-10 C. ACTING Committee on Native American Ministry (CoNAM) ..................... C-1 Peter D. Weaver Congo Partnership Team ................................. C-6 Hispanic/Latino Ministries Coordinator’s Report ......................... C-11 Salisbury Urban Ministries ...................................................... C-12 Methodist Action Program ...................................................... C-13 Africa University .................................................................... C-14 Conference Appeals Calendar ................................................... C-17 D. LEADING Board of Ordained Ministry ...................................................... D-1 C. A. R. E. Team .................................................................... D-2 Congregational Development Corporation ................................. D-3 Strengthening the Black Church Taskforce ................................ D-5 Strengthening the Black Church Director’s Report ..................... D-6 Cross Racial /Cross Cultural Committee .................................... D-8 United Methodist Men ............................................................. D-9 United Methodist Women ....................................................... D-11 E. LOVING Evangelism and Outreach ........................................................ E-1 Spiritual Formation ................................................................. E-2 i. i. Young Peoples Ministries Network ............................................ E-4 F. VISION TEAM ......................................................................... F-1 G. ADMINISTRATIVE MINISTRIES Board of Pensions ................................................................... G-1 Commission on Equitable Compensation .................................... G-5 2017 Equitable Compensation Support...................................... G-6 Board of Trustees .................................................................. G-8 Council of Finance and Administration ..................................... G-12 Episcopacy Committee ............................................................ G-14 H. OTHER AFFILIATED BOARDS Wesley Foundation: Delaware State University ........................... H-1 Wesley Foundation: Salisbury University ................................... H-2 Wesley Foundation: University of Maryland Eastern Shore ........... H-3 Wesley Foundation: University of Delaware ............................... H-5 Neighborhood House .............................................................. H-10 Board of Childcare ................................................................. H-24 Wesley Theological Seminary .................................................. H-25 R. RESOLUTIONS Organizational and Procedural Motion ....................................... R-1 Conference Rules of Order ...................................................... R-1a 2018 Consent Calendar ………………………………………………… R-2 Resolution on Wesley College ................................................. R-3 Resolution on Opposition to Capital Punishment ......................... R-4 Resolution in Support of Humane Immigration Policy ................... R-5 Resolution in Opposition to Physician-Assisted Suicide ................ R-6 Resolution to Invite Discussion and Sharing of Biblical Study Materials on LGBTQ Issues ............................ R-7 Resolution to Set Minimum Salaries for Calendar Year 2019 ....... R-8 Resolution to Urge Unity in the Face of Schism ......................... R-9 2019 Covenant Funding Plan ................................................. R-10 Change to Retiree Medical Coverage ........................................ R-11 Rental/Housing Allowances for Retired or Disabled Ministers of The Peninsula-Delaware Conference ................................. R-12 Setting the Pre-1982 Past Service Rate .................................... R-13 T. CONFERENCE TREASURER’S REPORT ........................................ T-1 X. Lay and Reserve Member List ..................................................... X-1 Lay and Reserve Member Correction Form ................................... X-2 2018 Report of Students Attending Colleges or Universities .......... X-3 i. i. Z. Disability Ministry Committee Events ......................................... Z-1 African American Summit .......................................................... Z-2 Mission u Brochure and Registration Form ................................... Z-3 Great Tree of Peace ................................................................. Z-4 Howard L. Gordy Jr. Clergy Assistance Fund .............................. Z-5 Churches as First Responders Flyer ............................................ Z-6 GBHEM General Agency Report ................................................. Z-7 i. ii. May 31 – June 2, 2018 Annual Conference Schedule University of Maryland Eastern Shore EVENTS SURROUNDING 2018 ANNUAL CONFERENCE Thursday, May 31 Clergy Executive Session, 1:30PM – 3:00PM, Student Center Theater Thursday, May 31 Laity Session, 1:30PM – 3:00PM, William P. Hytche Athletic Center WEDNESDAY, MAY 30, 2018 Registration — 4:00PM Laity- William P. Hytche Athletic Center Clergy- Student Center THURSDAY, MAY 31, 2018 Registration — 7:30AM Laity & Clergy- William P. Hytche Athletic Center Opening Worship & Communion – William P. Hytche Athletic Center 10:00AM Rev. Russell Ewell preaching Offering: Global Migration Noon Lunch 1:30PM Clergy Session begins in the Student Center Theater 1:30PM Laity Session begins in the William P. Hytche Athletic Center ii. ii. Time of Gathering — William P. Hytche Athletic Center 3:30PM Holy Conferencing 5:00PM Dinner — Student Center Time of Gathering — William P. Hytche Athletic Center
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Relatives of Temperate Fruits) of the Book Series, "Wild Crop Relatives: Genetic, Genomic and Breeding Resources Ed C
    Volume 6 (Relatives of Temperate Fruits) of the book series, "Wild Crop Relatives: Genetic, Genomic and Breeding Resources ed C. Kole 2011 p179-197 9 Rubus J. Graham* and M. Woodhead Scottish Crop Research Institute, Dundee, DD2 5DA, UK *Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract The Rosaceae family consists of around 3, 000 species of which 500 belong to the genus Rubus. Ploidy levels range from diploid to dodecaploid with a genomic number of 7, and members can be difficult to classify into distinct species due to hybridization and apomixes. Species are distributed widely across Asia, Europe, North and South America with the center of diversity now considered to be in China, where there are 250-700 species of Rubus depending on the taxonomists. Rubus species are an important horticultural source of income and labor being produced for the fresh and processing markets for their health benefits. Blackberries and raspberries have a relatively short history of less than a century as cultivated crops that have been enhanced through plant breeding and they are only a few generations removed from their wild progenitor species. Rubus sp. are typically found as early colonizers of disturbed sites such as pastures, along forest edges, in forest clearings and along roadsides. Blackberries are typically much more tolerant of drought, flooding and high temperatures, while red raspberries are more tolerant of cold winters. Additionally, they exhibit vigorous vegetative reproduction by either tip layering or root suckering, permitting Rubus genotypes to cover large areas. The attractiveness of the fruits to frugivores, especially birds, means that seed dispersal can be widespread with the result that Rubus genotypes can very easily be spread to new sites and are very effective, high-speed invaders.
    [Show full text]
  • Well-Known Plants in Each Angiosperm Order
    Well-known plants in each angiosperm order This list is generally from least evolved (most ancient) to most evolved (most modern). (I’m not sure if this applies for Eudicots; I’m listing them in the same order as APG II.) The first few plants are mostly primitive pond and aquarium plants. Next is Illicium (anise tree) from Austrobaileyales, then the magnoliids (Canellales thru Piperales), then monocots (Acorales through Zingiberales), and finally eudicots (Buxales through Dipsacales). The plants before the eudicots in this list are considered basal angiosperms. This list focuses only on angiosperms and does not look at earlier plants such as mosses, ferns, and conifers. Basal angiosperms – mostly aquatic plants Unplaced in order, placed in Amborellaceae family • Amborella trichopoda – one of the most ancient flowering plants Unplaced in order, placed in Nymphaeaceae family • Water lily • Cabomba (fanwort) • Brasenia (watershield) Ceratophyllales • Hornwort Austrobaileyales • Illicium (anise tree, star anise) Basal angiosperms - magnoliids Canellales • Drimys (winter's bark) • Tasmanian pepper Laurales • Bay laurel • Cinnamon • Avocado • Sassafras • Camphor tree • Calycanthus (sweetshrub, spicebush) • Lindera (spicebush, Benjamin bush) Magnoliales • Custard-apple • Pawpaw • guanábana (soursop) • Sugar-apple or sweetsop • Cherimoya • Magnolia • Tuliptree • Michelia • Nutmeg • Clove Piperales • Black pepper • Kava • Lizard’s tail • Aristolochia (birthwort, pipevine, Dutchman's pipe) • Asarum (wild ginger) Basal angiosperms - monocots Acorales
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1 Definitions and Classifications for Fruit and Vegetables
    Chapter 1 Definitions and classifications for fruit and vegetables In the broadest sense, the botani- Botanical and culinary cal term vegetable refers to any plant, definitions edible or not, including trees, bushes, vines and vascular plants, and Botanical definitions distinguishes plant material from ani- Broadly, the botanical term fruit refers mal material and from inorganic to the mature ovary of a plant, matter. There are two slightly different including its seeds, covering and botanical definitions for the term any closely connected tissue, without vegetable as it relates to food. any consideration of whether these According to one, a vegetable is a are edible. As related to food, the plant cultivated for its edible part(s); IT botanical term fruit refers to the edible M according to the other, a vegetable is part of a plant that consists of the the edible part(s) of a plant, such as seeds and surrounding tissues. This the stems and stalk (celery), root includes fleshy fruits (such as blue- (carrot), tuber (potato), bulb (onion), berries, cantaloupe, poach, pumpkin, leaves (spinach, lettuce), flower (globe tomato) and dry fruits, where the artichoke), fruit (apple, cucumber, ripened ovary wall becomes papery, pumpkin, strawberries, tomato) or leathery, or woody as with cereal seeds (beans, peas). The latter grains, pulses (mature beans and definition includes fruits as a subset of peas) and nuts. vegetables. Definition of fruit and vegetables applicable in epidemiological studies, Fruit and vegetables Edible plant foods excluding
    [Show full text]
  • Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS) for Examining the Genomics Controlling Prickle Production in Red Raspberry (Rubus Idaeus L.)
    agronomy Article Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS) for Examining the Genomics Controlling Prickle Production in Red Raspberry (Rubus idaeus L.) Archana Khadgi and Courtney A. Weber * School of Integrative Plant Science-Horticulture Section, Cornell AgriTech, Cornell University, 630 W. North St., Geneva, NY 14456, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Red raspberry (Rubus idaeus L.) is an expanding high-value berry crop worldwide. The presence of prickles, outgrowths of epidermal tissues lacking vasculature, on the canes, petioles, and undersides of leaves complicates both field management and harvest. The utilization of cultivars with fewer prickles or prickle-free canes simplifies production. A previously generated population segregating for prickles utilizing the s locus between the prickle-free cultivar Joan J (ss) and the prickled cultivar Caroline (Ss) was analyzed to identify the genomic region associated with prickle development in red raspberry. Genotype by sequencing (GBS) was combined with a genome- wide association study (GWAS) using fixed and random model circulating probability unification (FarmCPU) to analyze 8474 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and identify significant markers associated with the prickle-free trait. A total of four SNPs were identified on chromosome 4 that were associated with the phenotype and were located near or in annotated genes. This study demonstrates how association genetics can be used to decipher the genetic control of important horticultural traits in Rubus, and provides valuable information about the genomic region and potential genes underlying the prickle-free trait. Keywords: spinelessness; spine free; thornless; gene s; gene H; blackberry; black raspberry; Rubus Citation: Khadgi, A.; Weber, C.A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origins of Fruits, Fruit Growing, and Fruit Breeding
    The Origins of Fruits, Fruit Growing, and Fruit Breeding Jules Janick Department of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture Purdue University 625 Agriculture Mall Drive West Lafayette, Indiana 47907-2010 I. INTRODUCTION A. The Origins of Agriculture B. Origins of Fruit Culture in the Fertile Crescent II. THE HORTICULTURAL ARTS A. Species Selection B. Vegetative Propagation C. Pollination and Fruit Set D. Irrigation E. Pruning and Training F. Processing and Storage III. ORIGIN, DOMESTICATION, AND EARLY CULTURE OF FRUIT CROPS A. Mediterranean Fruits 1. Date Palm 2. Olive 3. Grape 4. Fig 5. Sycomore Fig 6. Pomegranate B. Central Asian Fruits 1. Pome Fruits 2. Stone fruits C. Chinese and Southeastern Asian Fruits 1. Peach 1 2. Citrus 3. Banana and Plantain 4. Mango 5. Persimmon 6. Kiwifruit D. American Fruits 1. Strawberry 2. Brambles 3. Vacciniums 4. Pineapple 5. Avocado 6. Papaya IV. GENETIC CHANGES AND CULTURAL FACTORS IN DOMESTICATION A. Mutations as an Agent of Domestication B. Interspecific Hybridization and Polyploidization C. Hybridization and Selection D. Champions E. Lost Fruits F. Fruit Breeding G. Predicting Future Changes I. INTRODUCTION Crop plants are our greatest heritage from prehistory (Harlan 1992; Diamond 2002). How, where, and when the domestication of crops plants occurred is slowly becoming revealed although not completely understood (Camp et al. 1957; Smartt and Simmonds 1995; Gepts 2003). In some cases, the genetic distance between wild and domestic plants is so great, maize and crucifers, for example, that their origins are obscure. The origins of the ancient grains (wheat, maize, rice, and sorghum) and pulses (sesame and lentil) domesticated in Neolithic times have been the subject of intense interest and the puzzle is being solved with the new evidence based on molecular biology (Gepts 2003).
    [Show full text]
  • Crop Profile for Caneberries in California
    Crop Profile for Caneberries in California Prepared: February, 2000 General Production Information ● Caneberries is the general term for Rubus spp., which are commonly called raspberries and blackberries. When picked, raspberries leave the receptacle behind resulting in a cup-shaped fruit. On the other hand, blackberries retain the receptacle within the fruit and the fruit are not cup-shaped. Raspberries are in Rubus subgenus Idaeobatus and blackberries are in the subgenus Eubatus. There are also hybrids between raspberries and blackberries such as loganberry, boysenberry, and ollalieberry (5). In this profile raspberries, blackberries, and hybrids are considered together except where noted. Where they are separated, raspberries are one group and blackberries and hybrids are another group. ● In 1997, 19,400,000 pounds of raspberries were produced on 1,900 acres in California. The average yield was 10,200 pounds per acre. The average price was $1.41 per pound and the total crop value was $27,330,000 (2). ● Blackberries were produced on 714 acres in California in 1997 (1). ● In 1997, 2,500,000 pounds of boysenberries were produced on 270 acres in California. The average yield was 9,100 pounds per acre. The average price was $0.67 per pound and the total crop value was $1,639,000. The 1997 crop value was down from a high in 1988 of $3,814,000 when the price per pound was $1.82. In 1988, 2,100,000 pounds of boysenberries were produced on 400 acres and yield was 5,300 pounds per acre (2). ● In 1996, California ranked third in raspberry production, producing 26% of the nation’s raspberries.
    [Show full text]
  • Berry Growing Business in 1896
    Berry Growing Business in 1896 The Blackberry, Raspberry and Loganberry In addition to the business done with strawberries, and as a sort of side issue to the latter, no small figure is cut by the shipment of blackberries, raspberries and Loganberries. In no one case in the valley is the acreage devoted to these latter berries as large as that of the smaller strawberry fields, but in nearly every case they are cultivated in small patches. In the length of time that they are marketable the raspberries follow strawberries, and some bushes bear a few berries nearly the year around and an enormous crop during their season. The blackberry season is comparatively short, but the fruit produced is second to none in size and flavor, and all varieties bear well in any part of the valley. They are extremely productive with good cultivation, and may be successfully grown in this climate without irrigation. The Loganberry, being a variety unfamiliar to people in any other place, I will devote more space to its account than to others. From a circular giving its history I extract these notes: The Loganberry originated with Judge J. H. Logan, of Santa Cruz, Cal., from whom it derives its name. Several years ago, growing in his garden, were plants of the Aughinbaugh blackberry and Red Antwerp raspberry. The plants, being near each other, had intermixed or grown together. The judge, having noticed that they bloomed and ripened their fruit together, conceived the idea of planting the seeds, from which planting resulted the production of the Loganberry.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex 2 Ministerial Notice 4
    Annex 2 PLANT HEALTH ACT 2009 PURSUANT to the Plant Health Act 2009, I, Timothy Whetstone, Minister for Primary Industries and Regional Development, make the following notice: 1. Application All previous notices made pursuant to Section 7 of the Plant Health Act 2009 are hereby revoked. 2. Interpretation In this notice: • “the Act” means the Plant Health Act 2009 • “soil” means the upper, outermost layer of soil, usually the top 20 centimetres consisting of rock and mineral particulates that may be mixed with organic matter and in which plants grow or are grown • “the Standard” means the document published by Primary Industries and Regions South Australia entitled the “Plant Quarantine Standard South Australia” 3. Prohibition on Introducing Pest Affected Plants or Plant Related Products - Pursuant to Section 7 of the Act 3.1 A prohibition applies to the importation or introduction into the State of the following: (1) any pest declared under Section 4 of the Act; (2) any fruit, plant or soil affected by such a pest; (3) packaging in which any fruit or plant affected by such a pest has been packed; (4) goods with which any fruit or plant affected by such a pest has come into contact. 3.2 The items below must not be imported or introduced into the State unless the provisions of the Standard have been complied with: (1) the following host fruits of fruit flies being, in my opinion, fruit of species that are likely to introduce fruit fly into the State: Common Name Scientific Name Abiu Pouteria caimito Acerola Malpighia glabra Achachairu Garcinia humilis Almond Prunis dulcis Apple Malus domestica Apricol Prunus armeniaca Avocado Persea americana Babaco Carica pentagona Banana Musa acuminata Blackberry Rubus fruiticosus Black Sapote Diospyros ebenum Blueberry Vaccinium corymbosum Brazil Cherry Eugenia uniflora Breadfruit Artocarpus altilis Caimito Chrysophyllum cainito Published in South Australian Government Gazette Adelaide, Thursday, 22 August 2019 Common Name Scientific Name Cape Gooseberry Physalis peruviana Capsicum Capsicum annuum var.
    [Show full text]
  • Dewberry – Wild Loganberry by Larry A
    Dewberry – Wild Loganberry By Larry A. Yung Jr. Glass Larry Sr. and Larry Jr. David Doty’s site http://www.ddoty.com/dewberry.html list that the original molds for the Dewberry were made by the Co-Operative Flint Glass Company and were later iridized by the Phoenix Glass Company. Dewberry pieces are rarely found. Most of the examples of the Dewberry that I have seen are in marigold over milk glass. Carl and Eunice Booker have the only Marigold goblet with souvenir lettering that I have heard of. The Dewberry has been reported in the following shapes; sugar, creamer, water pitcher, goblet, and covered compote. I have seen the pattern called Dewberry, Wild Loganberry, and Wild Berry. I did not know the difference between a Dewberry plant and a Loganberry plant. With a little research, I have found the following; both the Wild Loganberry and Dewberry plants are related to the Blackberry family, and are vines that grow on the ground. The Dewberry plant is reported to have thorns on the vine and the Loganberry is reported not to have thorns. In the articles I have read, I have found pictures of both plants with thorns on the vines. As shown in the examples above, the pattern on the glass does not have any thorns. Looking at the berries and the leaves, it takes a bit of imagination to see a match to either of the two plants. So after a couple hours of looking at articles describing the fruit, the only conclusion I can come up with is, if you own one you can call it whatever you like.
    [Show full text]
  • Nr 222 Native Tree, Shrub, & Herbaceous Plant
    NR 222 NATIVE TREE, SHRUB, & HERBACEOUS PLANT IDENTIFICATION BY RONALD L. ALVES FALL 2016 Note to Students NOTE TO STUDENTS: THIS DOCUMENT IS INCOMPLETE WITH OMISSIONS, ERRORS, AND OTHER ITEMS OF INCOMPETANCY. AS YOU MAKE USE OF IT NOTE THESE TRANSGRESSIONS SO THAT THEY MAY BE CORRECTED AND YOU WILL RECEIVE A CLEAN COPY BY THE END OF TIME OR THE SEMESTER, WHICHEVER COMES FIRST!! THANKING YOU FOR ANY ASSISTANCE THAT YOU MAY GIVE, RON ALVES. Introduction This manual was initially created by Harold Whaley an MJC Agriculture and Natural Resources instruction from 1964 – 1992. The manual was designed as a resource for a native tree and shrub identification course, Natural Resources 222 that was one of the required courses for all forestry and natural resource majors at the college. The course and the supporting manual were aimed almost exclusively for forestry and related majors. In addition to NR 222 being taught by professor Whaley, it has also been taught by Homer Bowen (MJC 19xx -), Marlies Boyd (MJC 199X – present), Richard Nimphius (MJC 1980 – 2006) and currently Ron Alves (MJC 1974 – 2004). Each instructor put their own particular emphasis and style on the course but it was always oriented toward forestry students until 2006. The lack of forestry majors as a result of the Agriculture Department not having a full time forestry instructor to recruit students and articulate with industry has resulted in a transformation of the NR 222 course. The clientele not only includes forestry majors, but also landscape designers, environmental horticulture majors, nursery people, environmental science majors, and people interested in transforming their home and business landscapes to a more natural venue.
    [Show full text]
  • CSUSB Scholarworks May 1St, 2019
    California State University, San Bernardino CSUSB ScholarWorks Coyote Chronicle (1984-) Arthur E. Nelson University Archives 5-1-2019 May 1st, 2019 CSUSB Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/coyote-chronicle Recommended Citation CSUSB, "May 1st, 2019" (2019). Coyote Chronicle (1984-). 727. https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/coyote-chronicle/727 This Newspaper is brought to you for free and open access by the Arthur E. Nelson University Archives at CSUSB ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Coyote Chronicle (1984-) by an authorized administrator of CSUSB ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Coyote Chronicle COYOTECHRONICLE.NET Vol. LXII, No. 2 May 1, 2019 Brianna Mendoza | Chronicle Photos The Teal Color Fest was bursting with support for sexual assault victims between the explosions of teal powder and the chants to fight back against abusers. Rasing sexual assault awareness at Teal Color Fest and activities, all hoping to However, through all the Sexual Assault Awareness Month move out of dangerous situa- By Destiny Johnson & inform students about the various light-hearted games of Jenga, (SAAM). tions. Brianna Mendoza resources that are offered on (and bean bag tosses and dance bat- Violence Outreach Inform- “I’m actually a survivor and Staff Writer off) campus. tles, powerful chanting could be ing our Community with Edu- that’s how I became a part of The Health Center had heard across the lawn. cation, also known as VOICE, VOICE,” said VOICE sunshine participants vote for their fa- “When survivors’ lives are organizes the Teal Color Fest for lead, Carissa Briggs.
    [Show full text]
  • Spotted Wing Drosophila Host List the Following List of Known Or Suspected Host Plants for SWD Has Been Generated Through a Literature Search
    Spotted wing drosophila host list The following list of known or suspected host plants for SWD has been generated through a literature search. The list continues to be monitored and updated as information comes to hand. Field collected – major host The following plants have records of SWD being collected from fruit “in-field”. These plants are considered to be the most important hosts for the spotting wing drosophila based on infestation rates and commercial impacts, though it is noted that not all of the listed hosts are grown on large scales. Cerasus mahaleb (Mahaleb cherry), Cerasus vulgaris (dwarf cherry), Elaeagnus multiflora (silver berry), Fragaria ananassa (strawberry), Myrica rubra (red bayberry), Prunus armeniaca (apricot), Prunus armeniaca x salicina (plumcot), Prunus avium (cherry), Prunus buegeriana (shirozakura), Prunus domestica (plum), Prunus donarium (wild cherry), Prunus japonica (Korean cherry), Prunus mume (Asian plum, Japanese apricot), Prunus persica (peach), Prunus persica var. nucipersica (nectarine), Prunus salicina (Japanese plum), Prunus sargentii (Sargents cherry), Prunus serrulata (Japanese mountain cherry), Prunus yedoensis (Tokyo cherry), Rubus armeniacus (Himalayan blackberry), Rubus fruticosus (blackberry, marionberry), Rubus ideaus (raspberry), Rubus lacinatus (evergreen blackberry), Rubus loganobaccus (boysenberry), Rubus parvifolius (Japanese raspberry), Rubus x loganobaccus (loganberry), Vaccinium angustifolium (blueberry), Vaccinium corymbosum (blueberry), Vitis labrusca (concord grapes), Vitis vinifera
    [Show full text]