Surrogate Motherhood

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Surrogate Motherhood Surrogate Motherhood Page ii MEDICAL ETHICS SERIES David H. Smith and Robert M. Veatch, Editors Page iii Surrogate Motherhood Politics and Privacy Edited by Larry Gostin Indiana University Press Bloomington and Indianapolis Page iv This book is based on a special issue of Law, Medicine & Health Care (16:1–2, spring/summer, 1988), a journal of the American Society of Law & Medicine. Many of the essays have been revised, updated, or corrected, and five appendices have been added. ASLM coordinator of book production was Merrill Kaitz. © 1988, 1990 American Society of Law & Medicine All rights reserved No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. The Association of American University Presses' Resolution on Permission constitutes the only exception to this prohibition. Manufactured in the United States of America ™ The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of American National Standard for Information Sciences— Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48–1984. Library of Congress Cataloging­in­Publication Data Surrogate motherhood : politics and privacy / edited by Larry Gostin. p. cm. — (Medical ethics series) Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0­253­32604­4 (alk. paper) 1. Surrogate mothers—Legal status, laws, etc.—United States. 2. Surrogate mothers—Civil rights—United States. 3. Surrogate mothers—United States. I. Gostin, Larry O. (Larry Ogalthorpe) II. Series. KF540.A75S87 1990 346.7301'7—dc20 [347.30617] 89­45474 CIP 1 2 3 4 5 94 93 92 91 90 Page v Contents Introduction ix Larry Gostin CIVIL LIBERTIES A Civil Liberties Analysis of Surrogacy Arrangements 3 Larry Gostin Procreative Liberty and the State's Burden of Proof in Regulating Noncoital 24 Reproduction John A. Robertson Fairy Tales Surrogate Mothers Tell 43 George J. Annas LEGAL STATUS Choosing Family Law over Contract Law as a Paradigm for Surrogate Motherhood 59 Alexander M. Capron and Margaret J. Radin Surrogate Motherhood and the Best Interests of Children 77 Angela R. Holder Legislative Approaches to Surrogate Motherhood 88 R. Alta Charo Page vi ETHICS Surrogate Motherhood as Prenatal Adoption 123 Bonnie Steinbock Is There Anything Wrong with Surrogate Motherhood? An Ethical Analysis 136 Ruth Macklin The Ethics of Surrogate Motherhood: Biology, Freedom, and Moral Obligation 151 Lisa Sowle Cahill WOMEN'S AUTONOMY Surrogate Motherhood: The Challenge for Feminists 167 Lori B. Andrews An Essay on Surrogacy and Feminist Thought 183 Joan Mahoney PUBLIC HEALTH Surrogacy and the Health Care Professional: Baby M and Beyond 201 Karen H. Rothernberg Surrogacy: A Preferred Treatment for Infertility? 221 Nadine Taub CASE REVIEW ESSAYS The New Jersey Supreme Court Baby M Decision The Case of Baby M: Love's Labor Lost 233 George P. Smith, II Page vii Solomon Would Weep: A Comment on In the Matter of Baby M and the Limits of Judicial 243 Authority Randall P. Bezanson APPENDIXES Appendix I 253 Excerpts from the Decision of the New Jersey Supreme Court, In the Case of Baby M Appendix II 261 Status of State Legislation Proposed or Enacted through October 5, 1988 Appendix III Model Surrogacy Acts A. Section of Family Law of the American Bar Association 270 B. National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws 280 Appendix IV Statements of Policy on Surrogacy A. The American Civil Liberties Union 293 B. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists 300 C. The American Medical Association 304 D. The American Fertility Society 307 E. The New York State Task Force on Life and the Law 315 F. Institute on Women and Technology 322 G. Testimony of Gena Corea 325 Appendix V Bibliography 338 Contributors 356 Index 358 Page ix Introduction Larry Gostin When the American Civil Liberties Union appointed me as chair of the ACLU Special Committee on Surrogate Parenting, the task seemed relatively straightforward. It quickly became apparent that each side in the surrogacy debate claimed that civil liberties principles supported its own preconceived view. Proponents of surrogacy argued that the right to reproductive freedom required the judicial enforcement of contracts. Opponents of surrogacy countered that the same civil liberty (this time focused exclusively on women's autonomy) militated against surrogacy agreements. The ACLU Committee had the task of unraveling the competing claims and of proposing a policy­neutral civil liberties framework for surrogacy. My chapter is built upon the ACLU's deliberations and conclusions on surrogacy. The validity of these opposing arguments depends upon whether there is a constitutional right to privacy in making a surrogacy agreement. John Robertson argues forcefully that there is a right to contract with consenting collaborators for the purposes of reproduction. He sees this right as virtually equivalent to the constitutional protection afforded to coital reproduction. If there is a constitutionally protected privacy interest in surrogacy, then the state must show a compelling interest in order to ban or regulate it. Robertson's argument is that the state could never show a compelling interest in banning surrogacy (a conclusion shared by the ACLU), but that it might have a compelling interest in regulating surrogacy, primarily to protect the interests of the child. There is little doubt that Robertson's argument would prevail if non­coital reproduction received the same level of constitutional protection as traditional reproduction. The Supreme Court has enunciated a fundamental right "whether to bear or beget a child." But Supreme Court reproduction cases have been concerned with sterilization, contraception, and abortion. These cases involved questions of sexual intimacy, personal and family relationships, and deep expectations of privacy. The Court has never decided a case involving non­coital reproduction. One could argue that the right to form a contract with a stranger for sterile artificial insemination has little to do with the loving and private relationships the Supreme Court has protected. In effect, the Robertson argument uses the name "reproduction" to assert a constitutional right to privacy. But reliance upon the words used in Supreme Court precedent is not the same as an argument about why surrogacy is a truly intimate relationship deserving protection under the privacy doc­ Page x trine. One reason given is that the private character of reproduction is not the loving relationship between two people, but the mere fact of reproducing an offspring that is biologically related to the couple. To feminists, it is anathema to suggest that a male's right to reproduce from his own gene line is the core value in the ethos of privacy. In the view of George Annas, the "core reality of surrogate motherhood is that it is both classist and sexist: a method to obtain children genetically related to white males by exploiting poor women." Annas uses symbols entirely different from those of Robertson, so their arguments seldom meet. To Annas, the question is not whether there is a constitutional right to privacy. His argument is that the reasons advanced for surrogate reproduction are abhorrent to commonly accepted social values. The implications are that a man has no "right" to a biologically related child; that women are exploited by fulfilling the man's desire for such a child; and that babies are treated as consumer products, which is immoral. This is a highly judgmental perspective on the free decisions of genetic fathers and gestational mothers, even though the judgments are powerfully stated and "ring true." But judgmental they are, for they say to men and women that they cannot do what they believe would make them happy, because others with a "finer" ethical sense should decide the "right way'' to reproduce. The "commodification" argument is extended and strengthened by Alex Capron and Margaret Radin. They meet Robertson's constitutional argument merely by asserting that there is no "absolute right to paid surrogacy." What is needed to sustain their argument is a careful analysis of why the considerable Supreme Court precedent cannot be applied to surrogacy arrangements. The chapter leaves several questions unanswered: How is surrogacy different from coital reproduction and the right to privacy? If there is no absolute right to paid surrogacy, is there a presumptive right? Were the state to ban all surrogacy—whether or not renumeration were offered—would such a ban fall afoul of the Constitution? The privacy argument is not merely theoretical, because it goes straight to the heart of Capron and Radin's thesis. They assert, with considerable eloquence and force, that commercial surrogacy should be banned on the grounds that it is potentially harmful to children. But they put forward no evidence to suggest that children born in surrogacy arrangements are less well off than other children, or even that their chances of thriving are any lesser. If non­coital reproduction is not constitutionally protected, Capron and Radin give us ample reason for the state to intervene, for the state must show only that its intervention is related to a valid governmental interest—e.g., to provide a clear rule in advance about who will be the lawful custodial parent. But if surrogate parents do have a constitutionally protected privacy interest, it is doubtful that Capron and Radin have demonstrated a sufficiently compelling interest to ban it. Their arguments about harm to children are speculative. They express philosophical concerns that Page xi "commodification" would undermine the social fabric, but they provide little data to suggest that children are imperiled. The argument that the child's interests are the most important in assessing surrogacy arrangements was first enunciated by Angela Holder in a seminal article in Law, Medicine & Health Care (12:3, June, 1984). At that time Holder represented a minority, perhaps even an eccentric, view.
Recommended publications
  • EAZA Best Practice Guidelines Bonobo (Pan Paniscus)
    EAZA Best Practice Guidelines Bonobo (Pan paniscus) Editors: Dr Jeroen Stevens Contact information: Royal Zoological Society of Antwerp – K. Astridplein 26 – B 2018 Antwerp, Belgium Email: [email protected] Name of TAG: Great Ape TAG TAG Chair: Dr. María Teresa Abelló Poveda – Barcelona Zoo [email protected] Edition: First edition - 2020 1 2 EAZA Best Practice Guidelines disclaimer Copyright (February 2020) by EAZA Executive Office, Amsterdam. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in hard copy, machine-readable or other forms without advance written permission from the European Association of Zoos and Aquaria (EAZA). Members of the European Association of Zoos and Aquaria (EAZA) may copy this information for their own use as needed. The information contained in these EAZA Best Practice Guidelines has been obtained from numerous sources believed to be reliable. EAZA and the EAZA APE TAG make a diligent effort to provide a complete and accurate representation of the data in its reports, publications, and services. However, EAZA does not guarantee the accuracy, adequacy, or completeness of any information. EAZA disclaims all liability for errors or omissions that may exist and shall not be liable for any incidental, consequential, or other damages (whether resulting from negligence or otherwise) including, without limitation, exemplary damages or lost profits arising out of or in connection with the use of this publication. Because the technical information provided in the EAZA Best Practice Guidelines can easily be misread or misinterpreted unless properly analysed, EAZA strongly recommends that users of this information consult with the editors in all matters related to data analysis and interpretation.
    [Show full text]
  • Gorilla Beringei (Eastern Gorilla) 07/09/2016, 02:26
    Gorilla beringei (Eastern Gorilla) 07/09/2016, 02:26 Kingdom Phylum Class Order Family Animalia ChordataMammaliaPrimatesHominidae Scientific Gorilla beringei Name: Species Matschie, 1903 Authority: Infra- specific See Gorilla beringei ssp. beringei Taxa See Gorilla beringei ssp. graueri Assessed: Common Name(s): English –Eastern Gorilla French –Gorille de l'Est Spanish–Gorilla Oriental TaxonomicMittermeier, R.A., Rylands, A.B. and Wilson D.E. 2013. Handbook of the Mammals of the World: Volume Source(s): 3 Primates. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona. This species appeared in the 1996 Red List as a subspecies of Gorilla gorilla. Since 2001, the Eastern Taxonomic Gorilla has been considered a separate species (Gorilla beringei) with two subspecies: Grauer’s Gorilla Notes: (Gorilla beringei graueri) and the Mountain Gorilla (Gorilla beringei beringei) following Groves (2001). Assessment Information [top] Red List Category & Criteria: Critically Endangered A4bcd ver 3.1 Year Published: 2016 Date Assessed: 2016-04-01 Assessor(s): Plumptre, A., Robbins, M. & Williamson, E.A. Reviewer(s): Mittermeier, R.A. & Rylands, A.B. Contributor(s): Butynski, T.M. & Gray, M. Justification: Eastern Gorillas (Gorilla beringei) live in the mountainous forests of eastern Democratic Republic of Congo, northwest Rwanda and southwest Uganda. This region was the epicentre of Africa's "world war", to which Gorillas have also fallen victim. The Mountain Gorilla subspecies (Gorilla beringei beringei), has been listed as Critically Endangered since 1996. Although a drastic reduction of the Grauer’s Gorilla subspecies (Gorilla beringei graueri), has long been suspected, quantitative evidence of the decline has been lacking (Robbins and Williamson 2008). During the past 20 years, Grauer’s Gorillas have been severely affected by human activities, most notably poaching for bushmeat associated with artisanal mining camps and for commercial trade (Plumptre et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Rejected Write-Ins
    Rejected Write-Ins — Official Travis County — November 8, 2016, Joint General and Special Elections — November 08,2016 Page 1 of 28 12/08/2016 02:12 PM Total Number of Voters : 496,044 of 761,470 = 65.14% Precincts Reporting 247 of 268 = 92.16% Contest Title Rejected Write-In Names Number of Votes PRESIDENT <no name> 58 A 2 A BAG OF CRAP 1 A GIANT METEOR 1 AA 1 AARON ABRIEL MORRIS 1 ABBY MANICCIA 1 ABDEF 1 ABE LINCOLN 3 ABRAHAM LINCOLN 3 ABSTAIN 3 ABSTAIN DUE TO BAD CANDIA 1 ADA BROWN 1 ADAM CAROLLA 2 ADAM LEE CATE 1 ADELE WHITE 1 ADOLPH HITLER 2 ADRIAN BELTRE 1 AJANI WHITE 1 AL GORE 1 AL SMITH 1 ALAN 1 ALAN CARSON 1 ALEX OLIVARES 1 ALEX PULIDO 1 ALEXANDER HAMILTON 1 ALEXANDRA BLAKE GILMOUR 1 ALFRED NEWMAN 1 ALICE COOPER 1 ALICE IWINSKI 1 ALIEN 1 AMERICA DESERVES BETTER 1 AMINE 1 AMY IVY 1 ANDREW 1 ANDREW BASAIGO 1 ANDREW BASIAGO 1 ANDREW D BASIAGO 1 ANDREW JACKSON 1 ANDREW MARTIN ERIK BROOKS 1 ANDREW MCMULLIN 1 ANDREW OCONNELL 1 ANDREW W HAMPF 1 Rejected Write-Ins — Official Travis County — November 8, 2016, Joint General and Special Elections — November 08,2016 Page 2 of 28 12/08/2016 02:12 PM Total Number of Voters : 496,044 of 761,470 = 65.14% Precincts Reporting 247 of 268 = 92.16% Contest Title Rejected Write-In Names Number of Votes PRESIDENT Continued.. ANN WU 1 ANNA 1 ANNEMARIE 1 ANONOMOUS 1 ANONYMAS 1 ANONYMOS 1 ANONYMOUS 1 ANTHONY AMATO 1 ANTONIO FIERROS 1 ANYONE ELSE 7 ARI SHAFFIR 1 ARNOLD WEISS 1 ASHLEY MCNEILL 2 ASIKILIZAYE 1 AUSTIN PETERSEN 1 AUSTIN PETERSON 1 AZIZI WESTMILLER 1 B SANDERS 2 BABA BOOEY 1 BARACK OBAMA 5 BARAK
    [Show full text]
  • Himpanzee C Chronicle
    An Exclusive Publication Produced By Chimp Haven, Inc. VOLUME IX ISSUE 2 SUMMER 2009 HIMPANZEE www.chimphaven.org C CHRONICLE INSIDE THIS ISSUE: PET CHIMPANZEES HAVE BEEN IN THE NEWS THIS YEAR. Travis, who attacked a woman in Connecticut, was shot to death. Timmie was shot in Missouri when he escaped and attacked a deputy. There are countless more pet chimpanzees living in private homes throughout the United States. This edition of the Chimpanzee Chronicle discusses this serious issue. Please share it with others. WHY CHIMPANZEES DON’T MAKE GOOD PETS By Linda Brent, PhD, President and Director When chimpanzees become pets, the outcome for them or their human “family” is rarely a good one. Chimpanzees are large, wild animals who are highly intelligent and require a great deal of socialization with their mother and other chimpanzees. Sanctuaries most often hear about pet chimpanzees when they reach adolescence and are too difficult to manage any longer. Often, they bite someone or break household items. Sometimes they get loose or seriously attack a person. Generally speaking, these actions are part of normal chimpanzee behavior. An adolescent male chimpanzee begins to try to dominate others as he works his way up the dominance hierarchy or social ladder. He does this by BOARD OF displaying, hitting and throwing objects, and sometimes attacking others. Pet chimpanzees do not have the benefit of a normal social group as an outlet for their behavior, and often these DIRECTORS behaviors are directed at human caregivers or strangers. Since chimpanzees can easily weigh as much as a person—but are far stronger—they are obviously dangerous animals to have in the Thomas Butler, D.V.M., M.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court of the State of New York County of New York ______
    SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK __________________________________________________ In the Matter of a Proceeding under Article 70 of the CPLR for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, THE NONHUMAN RIGHTS PROJECT, INC., on behalf of KIKO, MEMORANDUM OF Petitioner, LAW IN SUPPORT OF -against- PETITION FOR HABEAS CORPUS CARMEN PRESTI, individually and as an officer and director of The Primate Sanctuary, Inc., CHRISTIE E. Index No. PRESTI, individually and as an officer and director of The Primate Sanctuary, Inc., and THE PRIMATE SANCTUARY, INC., Respondents. __________________________________________________ Elizabeth Stein, Esq. Attorney for Petitioner 5 Dunhill Road New Hyde Park, NY 11040 Phone (516) 747-4726 Steven M. Wise, Esq. Attorney for Petitioner 5195 NW 112th Terrace Coral Springs, FL 33076 Phone (954) 648-9864 Elizabeth Stein, Esq. Steven M. Wise, Esq. Subject to pro hac vice admission January_____, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ................................................................................................ v I. SUMMARY OF NEW GROUNDS AND FACTS NEITHER PRESENTED NOR DETERMINED IN NONHUMAN RIGHTS PROJECT, INC., EX REL. KIKO v. PRESTI OR NONHUMAN RIGHTS PROJECT, INC. ON BEHALF OF TOMMY v. LAVERY. ............................................................................................................. 1 II. INTRODUCTION AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY .................................................... 6 III. STATEMENT OF FACTS ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Epidemiology and Molecular Characterization of Cryptosporidium Spp. in Humans, Wild Primates, and Domesticated Animals in the Greater Gombe Ecosystem, Tanzania
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Epidemiology and Molecular Characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. in Humans, Wild Primates, and Domesticated Animals in the Greater Gombe Ecosystem, Tanzania Michele B. Parsons1,2, Dominic Travis3, Elizabeth V. Lonsdorf4, Iddi Lipende5 Dawn M. Anthony Roellig2,5, Shadrack Kamenya5, Hongwei Zhang6, Lihua Xiao2 Thomas R. Gillespie1* 1 Program in Population Biology, Ecology, and Evolution and Departments of Environmental Sciences and Environmental Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America, 2 Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America, 3 College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America, 4 Department of Psychology, Franklin and Marshall College, Lancaster, Pennsylvania, United States of America, 5 The Jane Goodall Institute, Kigoma, Tanzania, OPEN ACCESS 6 Institute of Parasite Disease Prevention and Control, Henan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Zhengzhou, China Citation: Parsons MB, Travis D, Lonsdorf EV, Lipende I, Roellig DMA, Kamenya S, et al. (2015) * [email protected] Epidemiology and Molecular Characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. in Humans, Wild Primates, and Domesticated Animals in the Greater Gombe Ecosystem, Tanzania. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 10(2): Abstract e0003529. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0003529 Cryptosporidium is an important zoonotic parasite globally. Few studies have examined the Editor: Stephen Baker, Oxford University Clinical ecology and epidemiology of this pathogen in rural tropical systems characterized by high Research Unit, VIETNAM rates of overlap among humans, domesticated animals, and wildlife. We investigated risk Received: October 31, 2014 factors for Cryptosporidium infection and assessed cross-species transmission potential Accepted: January 9, 2015 among people, non-human primates, and domestic animals in the Gombe Ecosystem, Published: February 20, 2015 Kigoma District, Tanzania.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Perspective on the Mating Strategies of Chimpanzees
    The definitive version is available at wileyonlinelibrary.com: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/brv.12058/abstract Biol. Rev. (2014) 89: 356-374. First published online: 2 JAN 2014 doi: 10.1111/brv.12058 Roving females and patient males: a new perspective on the mating strategies of chimpanzees Nicholas E. Newton-Fisher ABSTRACT Mating strategies are sets of decisions aimed at maximizing reproductive success. For male animals, the fundamental problem that these strategies address is attaining mating access to females in a manner that maximizes their chances of achieving paternity. For chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), despite substantial interest in mating strategies, very little attention has been paid to the most fundamental problem that mating strategies need to solve: finding mates. Only a single model, Dunbar’s general model of male mating strategies, exists to explain mate-searching behaviour in chimpanzees. Under this model, males in most populations are regarded as pursuing a ‘roving’ strategy: searching for and sequestering fertile females who are essentially passive with respect to mate searching. The roving mating strategy is an assumption deeply embedded in the way chimpanzee behaviour is considered; it is implicit in the conventional model for chimpanzee social structure, which posits that male ranging functions both to monitor female reproductive state and to ward these females from other groups of males through collective territoriality: essentially, ranging as mating effort. This perspective is, however, increasingly at odds with observations of chimpanzee behaviour. Herein, I review the logic and evidence for the roving-male mating strategy and propose a novel alternative, a theoretical framework in which roving is a strategy pursued by female chimpanzees in order to engage successfully in promiscuous mating.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Music and the Seamier Side of the Rural South Cecil Kirk Hutson Iowa State University
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 1995 The ad rker side of Dixie: southern music and the seamier side of the rural South Cecil Kirk Hutson Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Folklore Commons, Music Commons, Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Hutson, Cecil Kirk, "The ad rker side of Dixie: southern music and the seamier side of the rural South " (1995). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 10912. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/10912 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthiough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproductioiL In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond Anthropomorphism (Sue Savage
    stone age institute publication series Series Editors Kathy Schick and Nicholas Toth Stone Age Institute Gosport, Indiana and Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana Number 1. THE OLDOWAN: Case Studies into the Earliest Stone Age Nicholas Toth and Kathy Schick, editors Number 2. BREATHING LIFE INTO FOSSILS: Taphonomic Studies in Honor of C.K. (Bob) Brain Travis Rayne Pickering, Kathy Schick, and Nicholas Toth, editors Number 3. THE CUTTING EDGE: New Approaches to the Archaeology of Human Origins Kathy Schick, and Nicholas Toth, editors Number 4. THE HUMAN BRAIN EVOLVING: Paleoneurological Studies in Honor of Ralph L. Holloway Douglas Broadfield, Michael Yuan, Kathy Schick and Nicholas Toth, editors STONE AGE INSTITUTE PUBLICATION SERIES NUMBER 1 THE OLDOWAN: Case Studies Into the Earliest Stone Age Edited by Nicholas Toth and Kathy Schick Stone Age Institute Press · www.stoneageinstitute.org 1392 W. Dittemore Road · Gosport, IN 47433 COVER PHOTOS Front, clockwise from upper left: 1) Excavation at Ain Hanech, Algeria (courtesy of Mohamed Sahnouni). 2) Kanzi, a bonobo (‘pygmy chimpanzee’) fl akes a chopper-core by hard-hammer percussion (courtesy Great Ape Trust). 3) Experimental Oldowan fl aking (Kathy Schick and Nicholas Toth). 4) Scanning electron micrograph of prehistoric cut-marks from a stone tool on a mammal limb shaft fragment (Kathy Schick and Nicholas Toth). 5) Kinesiological data from Oldowan fl aking (courtesy of Jesus Dapena). 6) Positron emission tomography of brain activity during Oldowan fl aking (courtesy of Dietrich Stout). 7) Experimental processing of elephant carcass with Oldowan fl akes (the animal died of natural causes). (Kathy Schick and Nicholas Toth). 8) Reconstructed cranium of Australopithecus garhi.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ecological Role of the Bonobo: Seed Dispersal Service in Congo Forests
    The ecological role of the Bonobo : seed dispersal service in Congo forests David Beaune To cite this version: David Beaune. The ecological role of the Bonobo : seed dispersal service in Congo forests. Agricultural sciences. Université de Bourgogne, 2012. English. NNT : 2012DIJOS096. tel-00932505 HAL Id: tel-00932505 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00932505 Submitted on 17 Jan 2014 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. UNIVERSITE DE BOURGOGNE UFR Sciences de la Vie, de la Terre et de l'Environnement THÈSE Pour obtenir le grade de Docteur de l’Université de Bourgogne Discipline : Sciences Vie par David Beaune le 28 novembre 2012 The Ecological Role of the Bonobo Seed dispersal service in Congo forests Directeurs de thèse Pr Loïc Bollache, uB Pr François Bretagnolle, uB Dr Barbara Fruth, MPI Jury Bollache, Loïc Prof. Université de Bourgogne Directeur Bretagnolle, François Prof. Université de Bourgogne Directeur Hart, John Dr. Lukuru Research Fundation Rapporteur Krief, Sabrina Dr. MNHN Paris Examinateur McKey, Doyle Prof. Université de Montpellier Rapporteur © Aux jardiniers des forêts. Puissent-ils encore vivre… tout simplement 1 Remerciements Financeurs : Le projet « Rôle écologique des bonobos » a bénéficié de diverses sources de financements : .
    [Show full text]
  • CALL NUM SUBTYPE Author/Artist TITLE B Gr Biography Billy Graham God's Ambassador B Sc Biography Allen, Tom Closer Look at Dr
    CALL_NUM SUBTYPE Author/Artist TITLE B Gr Biography Billy Graham God's Ambassador B Sc Biography Allen, Tom Closer Look at Dr. Laura, A B Hu Biography Anders, Isabel Standing on High Places B An Biography Andrew, Brother God's Smuggler Arial, Dan & Heckler- Feltz, B Ca Biography Carpenter's Apprentice, The Cheryl YB Mu Biography Bailey, Faith Coxe George Mueller B Lu Biography Bainton, Roland H. Here I Stand: A Life of Martin Luther B Ba Biography Bakker, Jay Son of a Preacher Man B Le Biography Barratt, David C. S. Lewis and his World B Be Biography Beaner, Lisa Let's Roll B Be Biography Beckingham, Paul M. Walking Towards Hope B Be Biography Belz, Mindy They Say We Are Infidels B Fl Biography Bingham, Rowland V. Making of the Beautiful, The B McP Biography Blumhofer, Edith L. Everybody's Sister: Aimee Semple McPherson B Bo Biography Bowman, Robert God of Wonders B Br Biography Brand, Dr. Margaret E. Vision for God B Br Biography Briscoe, Jill Thank You for Being a Friend B Br Biography Brown, Joan Winmill No Longer Alone B Br Biography Brown, Liane I. Refuge B Bu Biography Buntain, H. Treasures in Heaven B Bu Biography Bunyan, John Grace Abounding to the Chief of Sinners B Bu Biography Burke, Tim & Christine Major League Dad B Bu Biography Burnham, Gracia In the Presence of my Enemies B Bu Biography Burnham, Gracia To Fly Again B Bu Biography Burnham, Vera Green in Winter B Bu Biography Burpo, Todd Heaven is for Real B Do Biography Buss, Dale Family Man B Bu Biography Butler, Brett Field of Hope B Bu Biography Butterfield, Rosaria Secret
    [Show full text]
  • PETITION Before the Fish and Wildlife Service United States Department
    PETITION Before the Fish and Wildlife Service United States Department of the Interior March 16, 2010 To Upgrade Captive Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) from Threatened to Endangered Status Pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as Amended Pan troglodytes (Photograph by National Geographic) Prepared by Anna Frostic, Esq. The Humane Society of the United States TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction………………………………………………….…….……….…........4 II. Legal Background………………….…………….………………………………...7 A. Endangered Species Act Background…..…………………………………...7 B. The Listing History of the Chimpanzee……..….…………………………15 III. Argument: Depriving Captive Chimpanzees of Full Protection Under the ESA is Antithetical to Conserving the Species……….………….….……….20 A. The ―Split-Listing‖ Scheme for Pan troglodytes has Contributed to a Proliferation of Privately Owned and Exploited Chimpanzees, Interfering With Conservation of the Species in the Wild..…………....27 1. Chimpanzees in Entertainment.…………………..……..…………....29 a. Chimpanzees Are Widely Exploited for Entertainment in the U.S…………………………………………………………………..29 b. Because Chimpanzees Are So Pervasively Used in Entertainment the Public Believes the Species is Prevalent in the Wild………………………………………………………....69 c. Chimpanzees Used in Entertainment Are Abused and Mistreated................................................................................71 2. Chimpanzees Used as Pets……………………………………………...77 3. Chimpanzees in Biomedical Research Laboratories………..…........87 B. Threats to Wild Chimpanzee Populations Have Only Increased
    [Show full text]