DOCSLIB.ORG

Index of Names

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Index of Names INDEX OF NAMES Adickes, Erich 25 Descartes, Rene 50, 65, 96, 105, 177, Alembert, Jean Ie Rond d' 161 246, 250, 278, 285, 291, 293f, 296f, Ambrose, A. 295 299, 304f Apel, Karl Otto 103, 188f Dewey,John 78,81,84, 100f,118f Aristotle 7, 69, 91, 111, 137, 143, 177, Dingier, Hugo 175 229 Drieschner, M. 144, 158 Ayer, Alfred J. 57,63,80 Ebbinghaus, Julius 25f Baum, Manfred 27f, 32, 37f, 40, 42 Ehrenfest, Paul and T. 157 Bennett, Jonathan 30f, 34, 41, 52, 56, Einstein, Albert 3f, 123f, 132f, 214, 217, 65f, 68f, 71, 73-75, 82, 120, 211 224,229,232 Berkeley, George 7, 253, 279, 303 Elgin, Catherine Z. 223 Bittner, Riidiger 37 Euclid 80, 147~ 150, 155, 175, 187, Bohr, Niels 123, 133, 139, 152, 156, 164, 203-205,213,259,267 166-168 Boole, George 144f, 162f, 169f Feyerabend, Paul 92,100,180,187,192, Bouwsma, O. K. 306 202,216,219,222,231 Boyd, Richard 241 Field, Hartry 214, 224 Brentano, Franz 65 Finkelstein, D. 158 Bubner, Riidiger 77, 80-83, 85,93,99, Fisk, Milton 91 101,106,188 Frege, Gottlob 3, 118, 135 Burian, Richard M. 223, 227f, 230-232, 235,24lf Glitschenberger, R. 188 Gibbs, Josiah W. 157 Carnap, Rudolf 180,281-286,293, 295f, Glansdorff, P. 158 300-302. Godel, Kurt 213 Castell, L. 150 Goldman Alan H. 58,63 Chomsky, Noam 187,189 Gombrich, Ernst H. 86-89 Oarke, Noam 187,189 Goodman, Nelson 187 Clarke, Thompson 295,297 Gram, Moltke S. 51,63 Cohen, Hermann 32,34 Griffiths, Phillips A. 51, 63 Collingwood, Robin G. 4 Cornman, James W. 306 Habermas, Jiirgen 188 Cowan, C. L. 233 Hacker, Peter 59f,64 Crawford, Patricia A. 25 Hacking, Ian 103 Hanson, Norwood R. 231,297 Darwin, Charles R. 84, 130f, 142, 154, 168 Harrison, Ross 55,64 Davidson, Donald 78, 83, 90f, 95-103, Hegel, Gottfried W. F. 84,86,91,95,100, 105, 108-112, 114, 119, 242, 262, 248,253 306 Heidegger, Martin 78,81,101, 118, 154 309 310 INDEX OF NAMES Heisenberg, Werner 123f, 131, 133,157, Lorenz, Kuno 189,191-193 261 Lorenzen,Paul 175, 188f, 191, 195 Hempel, Carl G. 189, 208f, 257f Lovejoy, Arthur O. 84 Hermes, Hans 187 Lukasiewicz, Jan 157 Hilbert, David 144f, 149, 156, 174f Hintikka, Jaakko 50,64, 106f Mach, Ernst 124 Hobbes, Thomas 177 Macb:ltosh, J. J. 51,64 Hooker, C. A. 164, 170 Malcolm, Norman 64,295 Horstmann, Rolf P. 269 Maupertuis, Pierre Louis M. de 161 Hume, David 45,49,62,72,80,85,91, Mead, George H. 188 99, 116, 125, 127, 129f, 141-143, Mendel, Gregor 209 168,192,249,251 Minkowski, Hermann 260 Husserl, Edmund 100 Mittelstaedt, Peter 145, 158 Mittelstrass, J iirgen 188f, 191 James, William 187f Moore, George E. 45, 105f, 279-285, Janich, Peter 175, 189, 191, 195 287,289,291,295,300-302 Jauch, J. M. 158 Morgenbesser, Sidney 242 Johnson, Samuel 279 Nagel, Ernest 208 Kant, Immanuel 3-8, 10-13, 23-32, Neurath, Otto 231 37-43, 49f, 52, 55, 62f, 65-67, 69, Newton, Isaac 3f, 6, 124, 161,214-217, 71-75, 78-80, 84, 87, 89, 92, 95, 219-221,229,232,259,267 97-101, 105-108, 114-118, 124- 129, 135-140, 152, 155, 159, 171- Pappus 7 173, 175, 177, 180, 186-188, 191- Parsons, Charles 197,224 195, 228, 230, 245, 248-253, 258- Pierce, Charles S. 83-86, 179, 188, 197, 261, 263-267, 269, 285, 295f, 297, 199f, 208, 210-213, 216, 218, 222, 299 224, 227f, 235-240, 253f, 258, 261 Kekes, John 51,64 Penrose, R. 158 Klein, Felix 147 Piaget, Jean 188 Komer, Stephan 4, 6f, 25, 37,42,51,64 Picht, Georg 158 Kolmogorov, A. N. 144 Planck, Max 261 Kripke, Saul 90f Plato 7,34,118, 136f, 261 Kuhn, Thomas S. 92-97, 131, 157, 180, Poincare, Jules H. 147f,150 192, 216, 219, 221, 228f, 231-233, Polanyi, Michael 297 297 Popper, Karl 100, 13 Of, 134, 137, 157, 180,192,231 Lakatos,Imre 180 Prigogine, J. 158 Lambert, Johann H. 195 Prior, A. N. 158, 173 Lange, Friedrich A. 25 Putnam, Hilary 77, 84f, 87-91, 95f, 98f, Laplace, Pierre S. de 261 102, 114, 118f, 170, 187,197[, 20lf, Lehrer, Keith 95f, 102 211,222,238,241[,262 Leibniz, Gottfried W. 50, 178 Lewis, Clarence I. 80,92 Quine, W. V. 80, 9lf, 95, 102£, 118[,189, Lewis, David 242 197, 20lf, 213, 215,217,219,224, Locke, John 45f, 56,91, 95f, 99,253 227-229, 230-233, 235f, 240, 242, Lorenz, Konrad 134, 137f, 157, 187 262,286-292,296f,300-304,306 INDEX OF NAMES 311 Ravetz, J. 222 Sneed, Joseph 132, 157,189 Reich, Klaus 25f Spinoza, Benedict 50, 79, 81 Reichenbach, Hans 178,187 Stegmilller, Wolfgang 132, 157, 180, 189 Reines, F. 233 Stine, William 58f, 64 Rescher, Nicholas 173 Strawson, Peter F. 3-6, 25, 30, 32, 34, Riemann, Bernhard 80,147, 203f 42, 50, 52, 56, 60, 64, 71, 82f, 99, Rorty, Richard 50, 55f, 58, 61-64, 86, 102f, 115, 118, 183, 188f, 260, 262, 105-111, 113-115, 118f, 189,197, 297,306 242,262 Stroud, Barry 31, 34, 58, 64, 231, 233, Rosenberg, Jay 50, 64, 77f, 85-88, 90- 299-306 95,9~ 102, 197,21~216,219,221~ 224,227,263f,266-269,272,274 Tarski, Alfred 97f, 198, 200, 223 Russell, Bertrand 3,100,135,187 Thomson, Judith J. 58,64 Tlumak, Jeffrey 57,64 Schaper, Eva 25 Tugendhat, Ernst 157 Scheibe, Erhard 158 Scheler, Max 4,25 Urquhart, A. 173 Schlick, Moritz 295 Schrodinger, Erwin 164,166,261 Weizsacker, C. F. von 159-163, 165-168, Schwemmer,Oskar 188f 170-174, 187f, 237 Searle, John R. 189 Whitehead, A. N. 189 Sellars, Wilfrid 77, 85-88, 90-92, 99, Whorf, Benjamin L. 97 102f, 115, 197, 199, 200-206, 208, Wigner, E. P. 166 210, 212-214, 216-219, 221, 223f, Wilkerson, T. E. 42, 55f, 62, 64 227,235,241,261 Williams, Bernard 57,64 Shannon,C.E.134 Wittgenstein, Ludwig 50,53, 55, 78, 80, Shoemaker, Sidney 50,64,119,297 86,88,101,105,119,192,261 Smith, G. W. 56f,64 Wohlrapp, Harald 180-182,188 Smyth, Richard 262 Wolff, Christian 3 INDEX OF SUBJECTS Analogies of experience 14-24, 40-42, Historicism 91, 100f, 140 260f Analytical method, Kant's 6-8, 16f, 32, Idealism 3, 84, 253f 37 Indeterminacy of translation/reference Assertibility, semantic/warranted 201- 212-221,224,227-232,235-251 212 Information 134f Inner states 45f, 50, 52-62, 66f Categories (Kant) 6-24, 38-42, 66, 74, Instrumentalism 47f,229 128 Internal-external questions (Carnap) 281- Causality 9-19,40f 284,30lf Certainty 246,271 Intuition (Kant) 9-24,27-29, 38f Change of concept (meaning) - change of belief 202-205 Judgements about the past 52-56,66f Change of theories 69, 160f, 179, 187, Justification, prospective-retrospective 197, 208-210, 213-221, 224, 228- 221L 246-248, 252, 258, 267~ 271 230,246-262,267,271-273 Concepts: Ontological relativity 212-221,227-232, - a priori 38-42, 67 241 - objectivity- 52-63, 65-69, 74 Ontology 3, 8f, 162-166,256 Conceptual change 197-210,219,224 Conceptual scheme (framework) 4-6, Philosophy of mathematics 6f, 118f, 128f, 78-85, 95-101, 108-111,115-117, 154f 201-205, 219f Positivism 124, 154, 281 Conditions of possible experience 4-25, Pragmatism 83-88, 91, 101, 245, 253- 37L 139f, 154, 160,171,237-239 256 Constructive philosophy of science Presentation-research (Darstellung-Fors­ (Erlanger Schule) 177-187, 191, chung) 178-187, 192f 193-195 Probability 141-145 Descriptive metaphysics 4-6,8,38 Quantum theory 123f, 132f, 138f, 142- 156,162-166,172 Epistemology naturalized 78, 90-92, 237f, 245, 256, 277,285-293,302- Rationalism 177, 179f 304 Realism: Evolution 92, 94, 133f, 137, 154,177- - in general 130f, 153f 179, 247f, 254-256, 273 - explanatory 85-89, 90-95, 22lf, Explanation 185, 208f, 257f 255-261, 263f, 267f - internal 88-90, 197, 216, 230, 238, Foundationalist theories of knowledge 45, 241 277,300 - metaphysical 77,83-90,95,114,118, 313 314 INDEX OF SUBJECTS 130, 153, 161, 197-200, 211, 230, - in Strawson's sense 4-6, 25, 32, 37, 252f 50,52 - Peircean 83-85, 197, 199f, 210-212, Transcendental deduction 5f, 14-16, 224,236-241 19-24, 26, 67, 114, 116, 118, 128, - Sellarsian 85-90,92,197-221 193,249,258,263 - transcendental 48f, 57, 74 Transcendental philosophy: - in general 27, 77f, 99f, 113, 124f, 154, Scepticism: 177-179 - in general 45, 48, 50-62, 77f, 82f, - Kant's 5-9, 71f, 114-118, 124f, 19lf, 90, 116f, 246, 250, 271, 274f, 277- 245, 248f, 252, 261 306 Transcendental principles/propositions 6, - Cartesian 45, 50f, 56f, 59, 78, 246, 9-24,37-42 278, 293f, 299f, 304f Transcendental proofs 8-24,37 Scientific revolutions 69, 124, 159-162, Transcendental synthesis 5, 2lf, 27-31, 223,228-231,246f 39, 66f, 114, 127f, 245, 250-53, Self-consciousness (self-knowledge) 21- 257-259,264 23,27-31,50-61,65-67,73 Truth: Space-time continuum 147-152,175f - as coherence 81,85-90,95 Systems of representations 245-251, - as correctness 254-256, 263, 265- 254-260 267,273 - as correspondence 84-90, 95-99, Temporal1ogic 140,142-146,173-175 109f, 130, 198-219, 236-241 Theory of measurement 132f,164f - Peirce's theory of 85-87, 93, 197, Time 14-24,140-143, 152f, 156, 168f 199f, 210-212, 224, 236-241 Transcendental apperception 22-24,66 - Sellars' theory of 85-88,92, 200-219 Transcendental arguments: - Tarski's theory of 97f, 109f, 198-200 - in general 77-83, 89f, 93, 95, 99f, 105-107,152,155,277,293~302 Verificationism 48-50, 57f, 60, 74, 211, - analytical 30-34,37,45,50-63, 65f, 283,302,306 68f - Kant's 3-24,71-73 World 250-254 SYNTHESE LIBRARY Studies in Epistemology, Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science Managing Editor: JAAKKO HINTIKKA, (Academy of Finland, Stanford University and Florida State University) Editors: ROBERT S.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • On the Minimal Non-Fregean Grzegorczyk Logic
    Joanna Golinska-Pilarek´ On the Minimal Non-Fregean Grzegorczyk Logic To the Memory of Andrzej Grzegorczyk Abstract. The paper concerns Grzegorczyk’s non-Fregean logics that are intended to be a formal representation of the equimeaning relation defined on descriptions. We argue that the main Grzegorczyk logics discussed in the literature are too strong and we propose a new logical system, MGL, which satisfies Grzegorczyk’s fundamental requirements. We present a sound and complete semantics for MGL and we prove that it is decidable. Finally, we show that many non-classical logics are extensions of MGL, which makes it a generic non-Fregean logic. Keywords: Non-Fregean logic, Descriptive equivalence, Equimeaning, Extensionality. Introduction There are plenty of logical systems discussed in the literature which are fo- cused on different aspects of formal representation of real world problems. Over the years, the question as to which logic is adequate has been a matter of lively discussion. One of the fundamental controversies is the philosoph- ical status of classical two-valued logic, and in particular the paradoxes of material implication and equivalence. In order to remedy the dissatisfactory aspects of classical logic, many logical systems have been introduced, such as modal, intuitionistic, relevant, non-Fregean, and paraconsistent logics, among others. In [3] Andrzej Grzegorczyk introduced yet another logical system in- tended to cover the fundamental properties of descriptive equivalence of sentences. His main assumption is that the human language is used pri- marily to create descriptions of reality and logical connectives are the main tool to represent them formally. In order to be able to speak about inter- actions between descriptions—as Grzegorczyk argues—a logical language Presented by Heinrich Wansing; Received February 21, 2015 Studia Logica (2016) 104: 209–234 DOI: 10.1007/s11225-015-9635-y c The Author(s) 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • A Philosophically Plausible Formal Interpretation of Intuitionistic Logic
    MATHEMATICAL LOGIC A PHILOSOPHICALLY PLAUSIBLE FORMAL INTERPRETATION OF INTUITIONISTIC LOGIC BY ANDRZEJ GRZEGORCZYK (Communicated by Prof. A. HEYTING at the meeting of September 26, 1964} The notion of forcing introduced by P. J. CoHEN [2] in order to prove the independence of the axiom of choice, may be considered as a modi­ fication of the notion of fulfilment of a formula by a tree introduced by E. W. BETH [l] p. 447. But the word "forcing" used by Cohen suggests an interesting philosophical interpretation of intuitionistic logic. According to this interpretation, which shall be described in detail, the intuitionistic logic can be understood as the logic of scientific research (rather positivistically conceived) while on the other hand the classical logic is the logic of ontological thought. l. The formal description of scientific research Scientific research (e.g. an experimental investigation) consists of the successive enrichment of the set of data by new established facts obtained by means of our method of inquiry. When making inquiries we question Nature and offer her a set of possible answers. Nature chooses one of them. Hence scientific research may be conceived as a triple R=(J, o, P). The elements of R will be called: J - the information set, i.e. the set of all possible experimental data, o - the initial information, P - the function of possible prolongations of the informations. The set J may be finite or infinite. The elements of J are finite ordered collections of atomic sentences: Pt1(aJ), Pt2(aJ> ak), ... where Ptn are n-place predicates and a1, ak, ..
    [Show full text]
  • I Topics in the Theory of Generative Grammar (The Hague, Paris: Mouton, 1969), P
    NOTES I I Topics in the Theory of Generative Grammar (The Hague, Paris: Mouton, 1969), p. 11. 2 John Berryman, 77 Dream Songs (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1965), p.5. 3 Time, Vol. 99, No.8, Feb. 21 (1972), p. 8. 4 See my Understanding Understanding (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1972), Chap. II for a discussion of "what is said". 5 See my Philosophic Turnings (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1966), Chaps. XI - XIII for a discussion of related matters. 6 D. B. Wyndham Lewis and Charles Lee (eds.), The Stuffed Owl: An Anthology of Bad Verse (New York: Capricorn Books, 1962), p. ix. This is the source of some of the verse cited in this essay. 7 The wild Barbary sheep also called an aoudad. 8 Peter Selz with texts by the artist, The Work ofJean Dubuffet (New York: The Museum of Modern Art, 1962), p. 97. 9 Op. cit .. p. 103. 10 John Skelton (1460-1529) wrote a funeral service for the sparrow Philip slain by a cat. I I All Souls College of Oxford University. Christopher Wren the room designer. 12 From Andrew Marvell's poem of the nymph complaining of the death of her faun. 13 Section XIX of the version edited by W. F. Stead. 14 In T. S. Eliot's Fragment of an Agon. IS See T. Roethke's The Meadow Mouse. in his The Far Field. 16 See M. Gell-Mann and E. P. Rosenbaum, 'Elementary Particles', Scientific American (July, 1957), p. 5 - my source for these comments. 17 Landscaped Tables Landscapes of the Mind Stones of Philosophy (New York: Pierre Matisse Gallery, 1952), p.
    [Show full text]
  • Confrontation of Reism with Type-Theoretical Approach and Everyday Experience
    STUDIES IN LOGIC, GRAMMAR AND RHETORIC 27 (40) 2012 Witold Marciszewski CONFRONTATION OF REISM WITH TYPE-THEORETICAL APPROACH AND EVERYDAY EXPERIENCE 1. Grzegorczyk’s project for merging reism with type theory Quine’s famous essay “On What There Is” starts from the following remark. A curious thing about the ontological problem is its simplicity. It can be put in three Anglo-Saxon monosyllables” ‘What is there?’ It can be answered, moreover, in a word – ‘Everything’ – and everyone will accept this answer as true. Obviously, such accord is only apparent, since each philosophical doctrine offers its individual answer on what this everything does comprise. How- ever, the strategies of justifying their claims have something in common. Each philosopher tries to distinguish a category of entities whose existence would be most certain, beyond any doubt, and then – on this basis – to demonstrate the existence of other kinds of entities. Let the elements of such a basic category be called prime existents1 The history of philosophy can by summarized through mentioning kinds of entities which were acknowl- edged as prime existents by particular thinkers: by Plato – universal ideas; by Aristotle – substantial individuals; by Democritus – atoms; by Descartes – his own mind; by Hume – sense data; by Brentano (in one phase of his development) – mental phenomena, etc. What in the Aristotelian idiom is called individual substances can be translated into vernacular English as individual things or, even simpler, things – Latin res.2 1 In the use of the term “individual substances” I follow Moran’s [2000, p. 35] account on Brentano’s ontology. 2 Dictionaries contain a long list of everyday meanings of “thing”.
    [Show full text]
  • Jerzy Andrzej Chmurzyński SEARCHING EUROPE's
    DIALOGUE AND UNIVERSALISM No. 6–7/2002 Jerzy Andrzej ń SEARCHING ’DESTINATION ABSTRACT According to Andrzej ’vision, Europe has “reached” Christianity as its conjectural ideological termination. This view, though tempting, arouses reservations. First of all, Christianity is not a cultural monolith. There is a huge chasm between the “”with its ideal of perfection exhibited by rational effectiveness, and the Catholic and Orthodox ideal of perfecting oneself in ’sinfulness. Nor can one ig- nore ’deep cultural and religious split into a Latin West and a Byzantine East. Secondly, we have been witnessing diverse cultural and demographic transforma- tions in European civilization, some of which appear to be almost universal. They mani- fest themselves in a “”of individual Christianity, either in the form of “neolibertin- ism”, or in a separation of normative ethics from religious ideology. In this context, counter-cultural movements find ideological support in the American social conscious- ness, as in the ’phenomena of flower children and hippies. These tendencies may have evolved into the developing New Age ideology, although they do not exercise the same degree of influence on the population. Some of them stand in opposition to Judeo- Christian moral principles—especially in their advocacy of permissiveness. Others propagate the traditional values found in Oriental doctrines. All of them are apparently anti–Christian; they may lead Europe in a new, so far unknown direction. The decay of traditional morality was predictable, given the new permissiveness, es- pecially in the area of sexual morality. Some of the effects may be considered alarming in that they appear side by side with an increase in wealth.
    [Show full text]
  • Contribution of Warsaw Logicians to Computational Logic
    axioms Article Contribution of Warsaw Logicians to Computational Logic Damian Niwi ´nski Institute of Informatics, University of Warsaw, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland; [email protected]; Tel.: +48-22-554-4460 Academic Editor: Urszula Wybraniec-Skardowska Received: 22 April 2016; Accepted: 31 May 2016; Published: 3 June 2016 Abstract: The newly emerging branch of research of Computer Science received encouragement from the successors of the Warsaw mathematical school: Kuratowski, Mazur, Mostowski, Grzegorczyk, and Rasiowa. Rasiowa realized very early that the spectrum of computer programs should be incorporated into the realm of mathematical logic in order to make a rigorous treatment of program correctness. This gave rise to the concept of algorithmic logic developed since the 1970s by Rasiowa, Salwicki, Mirkowska, and their followers. Together with Pratt’s dynamic logic, algorithmic logic evolved into a mainstream branch of research: logic of programs. In the late 1980s, Warsaw logicians Tiuryn and Urzyczyn categorized various logics of programs, depending on the class of programs involved. Quite unexpectedly, they discovered that some persistent open questions about the expressive power of logics are equivalent to famous open problems in complexity theory. This, along with parallel discoveries by Harel, Immerman and Vardi, contributed to the creation of an important area of theoretical computer science: descriptive complexity. By that time, the modal m-calculus was recognized as a sort of a universal logic of programs. The mid 1990s saw a landmark result by Walukiewicz, who showed completeness of a natural axiomatization for the m-calculus proposed by Kozen. The difficult proof of this result, based on automata theory, opened a path to further investigations.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 on the Life and Work of Andrzej Mostowski? STANISŁAW
    On the life and work of Andrzej Mostowski ? STANISŁAW KRAJEWSKI and MARIAN SREBRNY (Warsaw, Poland) Andrzej Stanisław Mostowski was born on November 1, 1913, in Lwów. His father, Stanisław Mostowski, was a medical doctor and worked as an assistant at the Physical Chemistry Department of the University of Lwów; he was conscripted in 1914 as a military doctor and soon after died of typhus. The family had to be provided for by the mother, Zofia née Kramsztyk (1881-1963), who worked for many years in a bank. Andrzej (by his mother called Staszek after the father) had one sister Krystyna (after the war she settled abroad – first in France, then in Montreal). In the summer of 1914 Mostowski’s mother went with her children to Zakopane to spend holidays there; in the face of the outbreak of war and the death of the father they ? This text is translated from its Polish original published in “Wiadomo ści matematyczne”, Annales Societatis Mathematicae Polonae XXII.1 (1979), pp. 53-64, updated slightly where necessary. It is meant to present solely the events of Andrzej Mostowski’s biography. We do not discuss the content of his scientific output as such (other articles are devoted to it), but only provide some information on when he was involved in what and when his major works were created. The information included in this article have been taken from three following sources. Firstly, from the existing publications on the life and scientific output of Andrzej Mostowski. They are listed at the end of this text. The article by S.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction. the School: Its Genesis, Development and Significance
    Introduction. The School: Its Genesis, Development and Significance Urszula Wybraniec-Skardowska Abstract. The Introduction outlines, in a concise way, the history of the Lvov- Warsaw School – a most unique Polish school of worldwide renown, which pi- oneered trends combining philosophy, logic, mathematics and language. The author accepts that the beginnings of the School fall on the year 1895, when its founder Kazimierz Twardowski, a disciple of Franz Brentano, came to Lvov on his mission to organize a scientific circle. Soon, among the characteristic fea- tures of the School was its serious approach towards philosophical studies and teaching of philosophy, dealing with philosophy and propagation of it as an intellectual and moral mission, passion for clarity and precision, as well as ex- change of thoughts, and cooperation with representatives of other disciplines. The genesis is followed by a chronological presentation of the development of the School in the successive years. The author mentions all the key represen- tatives of the School (among others, Ajdukiewicz, Leśniewski, Łukasiewicz, Tarski), accompanying the names with short descriptions of their achieve- ments. The development of the School after Poland’s regaining independence in 1918 meant part of the members moving from Lvov to Warsaw, thus pro- viding the other segment to the name – Warsaw School of Logic. The author dwells longer on the activity of the School during the Interwar period – the time of its greatest prosperity, which ended along with the outbreak of World War 2. Attempts made after the War to recreate the spirit of the School are also outlined and the names of continuators are listed accordingly.
    [Show full text]
  • Andrzej Grzegorczyk (1922-2014)
    Stanisław Krajewski1 Andrzej Grzegorczyk (1922-2014) Andrzej Grzegorczyk died on 20th March 2014. Even though he was 91 years old, his passing was unexpected as he had been doing creative work almost until his last moment and his intellectual capacities seemed intact. His memoirs emphasized that he had been the previous century’s last world- renowned representative of Polish logic. While this is true, it seems much more important that he was a very unique person, academically and socially active, but also a free spirit who chose his own path. I. Life Andrzej Grzegorczyk was born in Warsaw on 22nd August 1922, the only son of Piotr Grzegorczyk – a Polish studies specialist stemming from an intelligentsia family from the Polish Galicia, then part of Austro-Hungary – and Zofia, a doctor born in the landowner family of Zdziarski from the vicinity of Płock. Her background was strongly leftist; her brother Mirosław Zdziarski, a known communist and a member of the Communist Party of Poland, was sentenced to death in Russia in 1937. Andrzej Grzegorczyk spent his entire life, with only short breaks, in Warsaw. As a child, he attended a private Catholic school of the educational society “Przyszłość” (whose other fledgling was Władysław Bartoszewski) and from 1938 – the Władysław Reytan state secondary school. After the outbreak of war, when his previous school organized clandestine secondary school lessons, he decided to return there and passed his school-leaving exams in 1940, on the day of France’s capitulation. To avoid being taken away to work in the German Reich, he 1University of Warsaw, Faculty of Philosophy and Sociology.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Fregean Logics of Analytic Equivalence (Ii)
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE Bulletin of the Section of Logic Volume 44:1/2 (2015), pp. 69–79 Andrzej Bi lat In memory of Andrzej Grzegorczyk NON-FREGEAN LOGICS OF ANALYTIC EQUIVALENCE (II) Abstract This paper presents the main assumptions of Andrzej Grzegorczyk’s last research project concerning the logic of synonymity. It shows that the basis of logic of analytic equivalence, presented in the first part of the work, fully corresponds with these assumptions. 1. Introduction From the formal point of view, the sentential part of non-Fregean logic (NFL ) is a collection of calculi formulated in the language LSCI of SCI (sen- tential calculus with identity) and containing the set of SCI theses. In 2011-2012, Andrzej Grzegorczyk designed (in [7] and [8]) a project of sen- tential logic with a synonymity connective, which may be included in NFL 1 Grzegorczyk’s scientific activity in the last years of his life was focused on the implementation of this project. This activity, and the works and discussions it inspired, gave a new character to certain research related with NFL . In particular, [6] presented the semantics (in the style of the algebraic semantics by R. Suszko) for the system marked by the symbol “ LD ” (Logic of Description) which is 1J. Goli´nska-Pilarek and T. Huuskonen also believe that the logic of synonymity according to Grzegorczyk can be classified as non-Fregean logic (see [5]). 70 Andrzej Bi lat the realization of Grzegorczyk’s original metalogical conception. In turn, in [4] and [5] LD was compared with the system marked as “ LE ” (Logic of Equimeaning), which is the last of Grzegorczyk’s metalogical proposals.
    [Show full text]
  • „Rocznik Łódzki” 2016, T. 6
    Rocznik Łódzki Redaktor Naczelny Jarosław Kita Zastępca Redaktora Naczelnego Krzysztof Lesiakowski Sekretarz Redakcji Tomasz Pietras Rada Programowa: Zbigniew Anusik (Łódź) Kazimierz Badziak (Łódź) Teresa Kulak (Wrocław) Giennadij Matwiejew (Moskwa) Krzysztof Mikulski (Toruń) Regina Renz (Kielce) Alicja Szymczak (Łódź) Leonid Zashkilnyak (Lwów) POLSKIE TOWARZYSTWO HISTORYCZNE ODDZIAŁ W ŁODZI ARCHIWUM PAŃSTWOWE W ŁODZI ROCZNIK ŁÓDZKI Tom LXV 2016 WYDAWNICTWO POŚWIĘCONE DZIEJOM ŁODZI I ZIEM WOJEWÓDZTWA ŁÓDZKIEGO ŁÓDŹ 2016 Adres Redakcji: ul. A. Kamińskiego 27A, 90–219 Łódź www.roczniklodzki.uni.lodz.pl; e-mail: [email protected] © Copyright by Polskie Towarzystwo Historyczne, Oddział w Łodzi, Łódź 2016 RECENZENCI „ROCZNIKA ŁÓDZKIEGO” Zbigniew Anusik (Łódź), Piotr Biliński (Kraków), Wiesław Caban (Kielce) Tadeusz Dubicki (Włocławek / Częstochowa), Jan Snopko (Białystok) Andrzej Stroynowski (Częstochowa), Edward Wiśniewski (Łódź) SKŁAD I ŁAMANIE Tomasz Pietras DRUK Księży Młyn Dom Wydawniczy ISBN 978-83-944310-7-5 ISSN 0080-3502 SPIS TREŚCI ROZPRAWY I ARTYKUŁY Witold Filipczak, Bolimów jako miejsce obrad sejmików województwa raw- skiego w XVII–XVIII wieku ....................................................................... 11 Krzysztof Lesiakowski, Ku społeczeństwu obywatelskiemu. Samoorganizacja społeczeństwa polskiego 1980–1981 ........................................................... 37 Leszek Olejnik, Prasa podziemna stanu wojennego w Łodzi (1981–1983) ...... 53 Przemysław Waingertner, Bitwa, o której miano zapomnieć. Batalia
    [Show full text]
  • Filozoficzne Implikacje Teorii Ewolucji
    Przegląd Filozoficzny — Nowa Seria R. 17: 2008, Nr 3 (67), ISSN 1230-1493 Ankieta Filozoficzne implikacje teorii ewolucji 1. Co uważa Pan/Pani za główne osiągnięcie poznawcze lub zaletę poznawczą teo­ rii ewolucji (TE) (prawdziwość, ogólność, empiryczność, moc eksplanacyjną)? 2. Co uważa Pan/Pani za główną słabość (błąd, mylącą sugestię) teorii ewolucji (TE) (mechanistyczne tłumaczenie modyfikacji genetycznych, brak predyk­ cji, brak globalnej interpretacji funkcji ewolucyjnych, duże luki w materiale paleontologicznym, wybuch kambryjski, drobne i nieliczne fragmenty kostne na dowód istnienia ogniw pośrednich)? 3. Czy TE może operować pojęciem „błędu ewolucyjnego”? Czy można stwier­ dzić, że jakiś gatunek świetnie dostosował się do środowiska, ale np. stracił zdolność rozrodu? Czy taka utrata zdolności będzie interpretowana jako „błąd adaptacyjny”? 4. Czy teoria ewolucji jest w stanie rejestrować zjawiska skokowe, gdyby takie zachodziły? Czyta się np., że sam Darwin uważał powstanie oka za zjawisko nagłe i całościowe; nie było ono kumulatywnym nagromadzeniem wcześniej­ szych funkcji, takich jak rozpoznawanie światła, zwracanie się w kierunku, z którego dobiega głos, itp. Czy to trafna interpretacja TE? 5. Zostawmy na boku predykcję (która jest niemożliwa) i retrodykcję (która tylko przypisuje różnym hipotezom różne prawdopodobieństwa). Czy możliwa jest falsyfikacja TE w tym sensie, że TE jest w stanie stwierdzić zajście zja­ wiska „ograniczonej kreaqi”, czyli wmontowanie w bieg ewolucyjny nagłego inżynierskiego wynalazku, który nie powstał z kumulacji prostszych modyfika­ cji? (Zostawmy też na boku wyjaśnienie, kto byłby autorem tej wyrywkowej kreacji: Bóg, ET, bakterie z meteorytów itd.) Istotne jest, czy TE może taki fakt stwierdzić, gdyby zaszedł. 6. Problem monogenezy i poligenezy gatunku Homo sapiens nie sprowadza się do braku danych paleontologicznych.
    [Show full text]