DOCSLIB.ORG

JAASV Olume 6 2 5 D Ec

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
JAASV Olume 6 2 5 D Ec The Arkansas Endemic Biota: An Update with Additions and Deletions H. Robison1, C. McAllister2, C. Carlton3, and G. Tucker4 1Department of Biological Sciences, Southern Arkansas University, Magnolia, AR 71754-9354 2RapidWrite, 102 Brown Street, Hot Springs National Park, AR 71913 3Department of Entomology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803-1710 4FTN Associates, Ltd., 3 Innwood Circle, Suite 220, Little Rock, AR 72211 1Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract Pringle and Witsell (2005) described this new species of rose-gentian from Saline County glades. It It has been over a decade since the publication of occurs on shale glades (on Womble Shale of Middle Robison and Allen (1995) that provided the definitive Ordovician age) in the eastern Ouachita Mountains and list of endemic flora and fauna of Arkansas. The on nepheline syenite glades (igneous intrusions of Late present study brings up-to-date the endemic biota of Cretaceous age) in the Upper West Gulf Coastal Plain the state. Since 1995, several new species have been of Saline County. described and new discoveries have been made, adding species to the state biota. Other species are deleted and Order Asterales new distributional information on other state endemics Family Asteraceae is presented. Specifically, 3 new plant species are Liatris compacta (Torr. & Gray) Rydb. 1931 – Blazing added to the state list while 4 plant species are deleted. Star Sixteen new animal species/subspecies are added to the This blazing star is endemic to a portion of the state list while numerous species are deleted. These Ouachita Mountains in Arkansas and is thus added to changes bring to 110 (10 species of plants and 100 the state list of endemics species/subspecies of animals) the total number of (http://efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=1&taxon_i Arkansas state endemic plants and animals presently d=250067095) [Flora North America, Vol. 21, p. 517] known, which represents a decrease by 7 species from (http://www.naturalheritage.com/program/rare- the 117 species reported in 1995. species/federally-listed/plant-profiles/blazing_star.asp). Introduction Order Brassicales Family Brassicaceae Robison and Allen (1995) published the definitive Streptanthus maculatus Hook ssp. obtusifolius (Hook.) list of endemic plants and animals of Arkansas. Since it Rollins 1959 – Clasping Twistflower has been over a decade since the appearance of This twistflower is added to the Arkansas list of Robison and Allen (1995), it seems entirely endemic plants. It is known from Faulkner, Garland, appropriate to bring up-to-date the endemic biota of the Hot Spring, Howard, Montgomery, Polk, Pulaski, and state. New species have been described and new Saline counties. Streptanthus obtusifolius was formerly discoveries have been made, adding species to the state (Kartesz 1994) considered within the range of biota. Additional discoveries require deletions of variability for S. maculatus but Kartesz and Meacham several species previously believed to be state (1999) subsequently recognized it as a subspecies. endemics. In this publication, we bring up-to-date the Recent authors have followed the Kartesz lead. state endemic biota, including new species additions, species requiring deletion, and adding distributional Deletions from State Endemic Flora information on other state endemics. Order Jungermanniales Family Lejeuneaceae PLANTS Plagiochila japonica Sande Lac. ex Miquel subspecies ciliigera 1959 – Liverwort Additions to State Endemic Flora The liverwort Plagiochila japonica and the Order Gentianales subspecies P. japonica subsp. ciliigera are not Family Gentianaceae currently considered to be separate from P. sciophila Sabatia arkansana Pringle and Witsell 2005 – Pelton’s Nees ex Lindeb. P. sciophila is widespread in Asia and Rose-gentian in North America is known from the Blue Ridge in the Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 62, 2008 84 The Arkansas Endemic Biota: An Update with Additions and Deletions Southern Appalachians, the Cumberland Plateau, and a New Distributional Information single location in the Ozark Mountains. Heinrichs et al. Order Ranunculales (2004) summarized the results of their morphological, Family Ranunculaceae molecular, and chemical work and presented an Delphinium newtonianum D. M. Moore 1939 – updated section and species list for Plagiochila. They Moore’s Delphinium noted that Plagiochila is notorious for variation in This state endemic has now been documented from gametophytic characters, especially leaf shape and 8 counties including Johnson, Montgomery, Newton, dentation. Pike, Polk, Pope, Searcy, and Van Buren (ANHC database; http://www.naturalheritage.com/program/ Order Caryophyllales inventory.asp). Family Caryophyllaceae Arenaria muriculata Maguire 1951 – Sandwort Order Rosales Arenaria muriculata has been lumped (along with Family Rosaceae several other taxa) as a synonym under A. muscorum Mespilus canescens Phipps 1990 – Stern’s Medlar (Fassett) Shinners. This group is now treated in the Phipps (1990) described this species from Slovak in genus Minuartia (see Flora of North America website Prairie County as the only American species of its at http://hua.huh.harvard.edu/FNA/; Arkansas Vascular genus. Prior to the discovery of Stern’s Medlar, the Flora Committee 2006). Before the merger, Arenaria genus Mespilus was comprised of a single species muriculata had been found in Texas, so regardless of native to western Eurasia but cultivated far beyond that how it is treated, it is no longer endemic only to area for its edible fruit and known as medlar. The Arkansas. closely related genus Crataegus, on the other hand, was known to include 140-200 or more species of Order Cyperales hawthorns throughout the northern hemisphere. A Family Cyperaceae recent paper by Lo et al. (2007), however, provides Carex opaca (F. J. Hermann) P. E. Rothrock & strong documentation to support a hybrid origin for Reznicek 1972 – Sedge Stern’s Medlar. On the basis of comparative molecular This sedge has been elevated to full species rank as studies, the authors (Lo et al. 2007) propose a hybrid Carex opaca (F. J. Herm.) by Rothrock and Reznicek origin from our native species Crataegus (2001). It is now known from several other states and brachyacantha and the Eurasian Mespilus germanica. should be omitted from the list of state endemics. A They further propose that the species should be known distribution map for this species can be seen at the as Crataegus X canescens (J. B. Phipps) T. A. following site: (http://www.efloras.org/ Dickinson and E. Y. Y. Lo. object_page.aspx?object_id=9479&flora_id=1) A hybrid origin for Stern’s Medlar presupposes that a cultivated specimen of medlar came into contact with Order Brassicales a native plant of Crataegus brachyacantha, the Family Brassicaceae blueberry hawthorn. The blueberry hawthorn is known Cardamine angustata var. ouachitana E. B. Smith from several Arkansas counties in the Delta and 1982 – Toothwort Coastal Plain regions, but has not been reported from The recently published Checklist of the Vascular Prairie County, the only known locality for Stern’s Plants of Arkansas (Arkansas Vascular Flora Medlar. The Slovak area was home to Czechs and Committee 2006) merges this variety into synonymy other settlers having an Eastern European origin. with the species. Also, the online database known as Although seldom seen today, medlar fruits were much ITIS (Integrated Taxonomic Information System; prized in the past and much planted throughout Europe. http://www.itis.gov/) does not accept this variety but Cultivation of medlar by one or more of these early considers it within the range of variation for the settlers is not unexpected. species. Similarly, the online database known as MorphoBank (http://morphobank.geongrid.org/) does Order Fagales not recognize this taxon. For these reasons, Cardamine Family Fagaceae angustata var. ouachitana E.B. Smith is deleted from Quercus shumardi Buckl. var. acerifolia E. J. Palmer the list of state endemic plants. 1926 – Maple-Leaved Oak A recently published volume of Flora North America [Volume 3] elevated this taxon to the rank of full species, i.e. Quercus acerifolia (E. J. Palmer) N. A. Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 62, 2008 85 H. Robison, C. McAllister, C. Carlton, and G. Tucker Stoynoff & W. J. Hess based upon Stoynoff and Hess as G1 and is considered critically imperiled (1990) (http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx? (NatureServe 2008). flora_id=1&taxon_id=233501004). Later, Hess and Stoynoff (1998) completed a morphological ANIMALS comparison of 4 members of the Quercus shumardii complex. Additions to State Endemic Fauna The maple-leaved oak was believed to be endemic Order Amphipoda (scuds, sideswimmers) to Magazine Mountain, Logan County, in the Arkansas Family Crangonyctidae River Valley province (Robison and Allen 1988) Crangonyx aka Zhang and Holsinger 2003 until 1991. Johnson (1992) extended the known Described by Zhang and Holsinger (2003) from an distribution to Pryor Mountain, Montgomery County, unmarked stream in Pope County, ca. 0.5 mi (0.8 km) and Sugarloaf Mountain, Sebastian County. In 1993 an south of Hector on St. Hwy. 27 (USNM 230406 – additional population was discovered on Porter Holotype. R. Fox. 28 Dec 1970). Mountain, Polk County, bringing the total known populations to 4 (Rouw and Johnson 1994). Bacturus speleopolis Holsinger, Sawicki, and Graening 2006 Order Boraginales Holsinger et al. (2006) described Bacturus Family Hydrophyllaceae speleopolis,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations
    Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations Revised Report and Documentation Prepared for: Department of Defense U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Submitted by: January 2004 Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations: Revised Report and Documentation CONTENTS 1.0 Executive Summary..........................................................................................iii 2.0 Introduction – Project Description................................................................. 1 3.0 Methods ................................................................................................................ 3 3.1 NatureServe Data................................................................................................ 3 3.2 DOD Installations............................................................................................... 5 3.3 Species at Risk .................................................................................................... 6 4.0 Results................................................................................................................... 8 4.1 Nationwide Assessment of Species at Risk on DOD Installations..................... 8 4.2 Assessment of Species at Risk by Military Service.......................................... 13 4.3 Assessment of Species at Risk on Installations ................................................ 15 5.0 Conclusion and Management Recommendations.................................... 22 6.0 Future Directions.............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Decapoda: Cambaridae) of Arkansas Henry W
    Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science Volume 71 Article 9 2017 An Annotated Checklist of the Crayfishes (Decapoda: Cambaridae) of Arkansas Henry W. Robison Retired, [email protected] Keith A. Crandall George Washington University, [email protected] Chris T. McAllister Eastern Oklahoma State College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas Part of the Biology Commons, and the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Recommended Citation Robison, Henry W.; Crandall, Keith A.; and McAllister, Chris T. (2017) "An Annotated Checklist of the Crayfishes (Decapoda: Cambaridae) of Arkansas," Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science: Vol. 71 , Article 9. Available at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas/vol71/iss1/9 This article is available for use under the Creative Commons license: Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0). Users are able to read, download, copy, print, distribute, search, link to the full texts of these articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. An Annotated Checklist of the Crayfishes (Decapoda: Cambaridae) of Arkansas Cover Page Footnote Our deepest thanks go to HWR’s numerous former SAU students who traveled with him in search of crayfishes on many fieldtrips throughout Arkansas from 1971 to 2008. Personnel especially integral to this study were C.
    [Show full text]
  • Ouachita Mountains Ecoregional Assessment December 2003
    Ouachita Mountains Ecoregional Assessment December 2003 Ouachita Ecoregional Assessment Team Arkansas Field Office 601 North University Ave. Little Rock, AR 72205 Oklahoma Field Office 2727 East 21st Street Tulsa, OK 74114 Ouachita Mountains Ecoregional Assessment ii 12/2003 Table of Contents Ouachita Mountains Ecoregional Assessment............................................................................................................................i Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................................................................iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..............................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................................3 BACKGROUND ...........................................................................................................................4 Ecoregional Boundary Delineation.............................................................................................................................................4 Geology..........................................................................................................................................................................................5 Soils................................................................................................................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Nabs 2004 Final
    CURRENT AND SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHIES ON BENTHIC BIOLOGY 2004 Published August, 2005 North American Benthological Society 2 FOREWORD “Current and Selected Bibliographies on Benthic Biology” is published annu- ally for the members of the North American Benthological Society, and summarizes titles of articles published during the previous year. Pertinent titles prior to that year are also included if they have not been cited in previous reviews. I wish to thank each of the members of the NABS Literature Review Committee for providing bibliographic information for the 2004 NABS BIBLIOGRAPHY. I would also like to thank Elizabeth Wohlgemuth, INHS Librarian, and library assis- tants Anna FitzSimmons, Jessica Beverly, and Elizabeth Day, for their assistance in putting the 2004 bibliography together. Membership in the North American Benthological Society may be obtained by contacting Ms. Lucinda B. Johnson, Natural Resources Research Institute, Uni- versity of Minnesota, 5013 Miller Trunk Highway, Duluth, MN 55811. Phone: 218/720-4251. email:[email protected]. Dr. Donald W. Webb, Editor NABS Bibliography Illinois Natural History Survey Center for Biodiversity 607 East Peabody Drive Champaign, IL 61820 217/333-6846 e-mail: [email protected] 3 CONTENTS PERIPHYTON: Christine L. Weilhoefer, Environmental Science and Resources, Portland State University, Portland, O97207.................................5 ANNELIDA (Oligochaeta, etc.): Mark J. Wetzel, Center for Biodiversity, Illinois Natural History Survey, 607 East Peabody Drive, Champaign, IL 61820.................................................................................................................6 ANNELIDA (Hirudinea): Donald J. Klemm, Ecosystems Research Branch (MS-642), Ecological Exposure Research Division, National Exposure Re- search Laboratory, Office of Research & Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 26 W. Martin Luther King Dr., Cincinnati, OH 45268- 0001 and William E.
    [Show full text]
  • At-Risk Species Assessment on Southern National Forests, Refuges, and Other Protected Areas
    David Moynahan | St. Marks NWR At-Risk Species Assessment on Southern National Forests, Refuges, and Other Protected Areas National Wildlife Refuge Association Mark Sowers, Editor October 2017 1001 Connecticut Avenue NW, Suite 905, Washington, DC 20036 • 202-417-3803 • www.refugeassociation.org At-Risk Species Assessment on Southern National Forests, Refuges, and Other Protected Areas Table of Contents Introduction and Methods ................................................................................................3 Results and Discussion ......................................................................................................9 Suites of Species: Occurrences and Habitat Management ...........................................12 Progress and Next Steps .................................................................................................13 Appendix I: Suites of Species ..........................................................................................17 Florida Panhandle ............................................................................................................................18 Peninsular Florida .............................................................................................................................28 Southern Blue Ridge and Southern Ridge and Valley ...............................................................................................................................39 Interior Low Plateau and Cumberland Plateau, Central Ridge and Valley ...............................................................................................46
    [Show full text]
  • Status Survey of the Arkansas Endemic Crayfish, Fallicambarus Gilpini Hobbs and Robinson Henry W
    Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science Volume 59 Article 22 2005 Status Survey of the Arkansas Endemic Crayfish, Fallicambarus gilpini Hobbs and Robinson Henry W. Robison Southern Arkansas University, [email protected] Brian K. Wagner Arkansas Game and Fish Commission Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas Part of the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation Robison, Henry W. and Wagner, Brian K. (2005) "Status Survey of the Arkansas Endemic Crayfish, Fallicambarus gilpini Hobbs and Robinson," Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science: Vol. 59 , Article 22. Available at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas/vol59/iss1/22 This article is available for use under the Creative Commons license: Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0). Users are able to read, download, copy, print, distribute, search, link to the full texts of these articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 59 [2005], Art. 22 Status Survey of the Arkansas Endemic Crayfish, Fallicambarus gilpiniHobbs and Robison Henry W. Robison 13 and Brian K. Wagner 2 iDepartment ofBiological Sciences, Southern Arkansas University, Magnolia, AR 71754-9354 Arkansas Game and Fish Commission, 975 East Sevier St., Benton, AR 72015 31 Correspondent: [email protected] Abstract Fieldwork was conducted during 2002-2003 on the rare, Arkansas endemic crayfish, Fallicambarus gilpini Hobbs and Robison.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae (PDF)
    CURRICULUM VITAE Steven J. Taylor April 2020 Colorado Springs, Colorado 80903 [email protected] Cell: 217-714-2871 EDUCATION: Ph.D. in Zoology May 1996. Department of Zoology, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois; Dr. J. E. McPherson, Chair. M.S. in Biology August 1987. Department of Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas; Dr. Merrill H. Sweet, Chair. B.A. with Distinction in Biology 1983. Hendrix College, Conway, Arkansas. PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS: • Associate Research Professor, Colorado College (Fall 2017 – April 2020) • Research Associate, Zoology Department, Denver Museum of Nature & Science (January 1, 2018 – December 31, 2020) • Research Affiliate, Illinois Natural History Survey, Prairie Research Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (16 February 2018 – present) • Department of Entomology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (2005 – present) • Department of Animal Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (March 2016 – July 2017) • Program in Ecology, Evolution, and Conservation Biology (PEEC), School of Integrative Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (December 2011 – July 2017) • Department of Zoology, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale (2005 – July 2017) • Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign (2004 – 2007) PEER REVIEWED PUBLICATIONS: Swanson, D.R., S.W. Heads, S.J. Taylor, and Y. Wang. A new remarkably preserved fossil assassin bug (Insecta: Heteroptera: Reduviidae) from the Eocene Green River Formation of Colorado. Palaeontology or Papers in Palaeontology (Submitted 13 February 2020) Cable, A.B., J.M. O’Keefe, J.L. Deppe, T.C. Hohoff, S.J. Taylor, M.A. Davis. Habitat suitability and connectivity modeling reveal priority areas for Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis) conservation in a complex habitat mosaic.
    [Show full text]
  • Sensitive Species That Are Not Listed Or Proposed Under the ESA Sorted By: Major Group, Subgroup, NS Sci
    Forest Service Sensitive Species that are not listed or proposed under the ESA Sorted by: Major Group, Subgroup, NS Sci. Name; Legend: Page 94 REGION 10 REGION 1 REGION 2 REGION 3 REGION 4 REGION 5 REGION 6 REGION 8 REGION 9 ALTERNATE NATURESERVE PRIMARY MAJOR SUB- U.S. N U.S. 2005 NATURESERVE SCIENTIFIC NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME(S) COMMON NAME GROUP GROUP G RANK RANK ESA C 9 Anahita punctulata Southeastern Wandering Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G4 NNR 9 Apochthonius indianensis A Pseudoscorpion Invertebrate Arachnid G1G2 N1N2 9 Apochthonius paucispinosus Dry Fork Valley Cave Invertebrate Arachnid G1 N1 Pseudoscorpion 9 Erebomaster flavescens A Cave Obligate Harvestman Invertebrate Arachnid G3G4 N3N4 9 Hesperochernes mirabilis Cave Psuedoscorpion Invertebrate Arachnid G5 N5 8 Hypochilus coylei A Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G3? NNR 8 Hypochilus sheari A Lampshade Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G2G3 NNR 9 Kleptochthonius griseomanus An Indiana Cave Pseudoscorpion Invertebrate Arachnid G1 N1 8 Kleptochthonius orpheus Orpheus Cave Pseudoscorpion Invertebrate Arachnid G1 N1 9 Kleptochthonius packardi A Cave Obligate Pseudoscorpion Invertebrate Arachnid G2G3 N2N3 9 Nesticus carteri A Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid GNR NNR 8 Nesticus cooperi Lost Nantahala Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G1 N1 8 Nesticus crosbyi A Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G1? NNR 8 Nesticus mimus A Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G2 NNR 8 Nesticus sheari A Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G2? NNR 8 Nesticus silvanus A Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G2? NNR
    [Show full text]
  • Endemic Flora and Fauna of Arkansas Henry W
    Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science Volume 36 Article 17 1982 Endemic Flora and Fauna of Arkansas Henry W. Robison Southern Arkansas University Kenneth L. Smith Arkansas Natural Heritage Commission Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas Part of the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Recommended Citation Robison, Henry W. and Smith, Kenneth L. (1982) "Endemic Flora and Fauna of Arkansas," Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science: Vol. 36 , Article 17. Available at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas/vol36/iss1/17 This article is available for use under the Creative Commons license: Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0). Users are able to read, download, copy, print, distribute, search, link to the full texts of these articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 36 [1982], Art. 17 THE ENDEMIC FLORA AND FAUNA OF ARKANSAS HENRY W. ROBISON Department of Biological Sciences Southern Arkansas University Magnolia, Arkansas 71753 KENNETH L.SMITH Arkansas Natural Heritage Commission Suite 500, Continental Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 ABSTRACT Arkansas has an amazing diversity of plants and animals contained within its political boundaries. Forty-seven taxa are reported as Arkansas endemics, including seven plants, thirteen crustaceans (two amphipods, three isopods, eight crayfishes), nine insects (one mayfly, one caddisfly, three stoneflies, four beetles), ten snails, six fishes, and two salamanders.
    [Show full text]
  • I Llllll Lllll Lllll Lllll Lllll Lllll Lllll Lllll Llll Llll
    Borrower: TXA Call#: QH75.A1 Internet Lending Strin{1: *COD,OKU,IWA,UND,CUI Location: Internet Access (Jan. 01, ~ 1997)- ~ Patron: Bandel, Micaela ;..... 0960-3115 -11) Journal Title: Biodiversity and conservation. ........'"O ;::::s Volume: 12 l~;sue: 3 0 ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; ~ MonthNear: :W03Pages: 441~ c.oi ~ ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; ~ 1rj - Article Author: 0 - ODYSSEY ENABLED '"O - crj = Article Title: DC Culver, MC Christman, WR ;..... - 0 Elliot, WR Hobbs et al.; The North American Charge ........ - Obligate Cave 1=auna; regional patterns 0 -;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; Maxcost: $501FM u -;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; <.,....; - Shipping Address: 0 - Imprint: London ; Chapman & Hall, c1992- Texas A&M University >-. ..... Sterling C. Evans Library, ILL ~ M r/'J N ILL Number: 85855887 5000 TAMUS ·-;..... N 11) LC) College Station, TX 77843-5000 ~ oq- Illllll lllll lllll lllll lllll lllll lllll lllll llll llll FEDEX/GWLA ·-~ z ~ I- Fax: 979-458-2032 "C cu Ariel: 128.194.84.50 :J ...J Email: [email protected] Odyssey Address: 165.91.74.104 B'odiversity and Conservation 12: 441-468, 2003. <£ 2003 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. The North American obligate cave fauna: regional patterns 1 2 3 DAVID C. CULVER ·*, MARY C. CHRISTMAN , WILLIAM R. ELLIOTT , HORTON H. HOBBS IIl4 and JAMES R. REDDELL5 1 Department of Biology, American University, 4400 Massachusetts Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20016, USA; 2 £epartment of Animal and Avian Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA; 3M issouri Department of Conservation, Natural History Section, P.O. Box 180, Jefferson City, MO 65/02-0.'80, USA; 'Department of Biology, Wittenberg University, P.O. Box 720, Springfield, OH 45501-0:'20, USA; 5 Texas Memorial Museum, The University of Texas, 2400 Trinity, Austin, TX 78705, USA; *Author for correspondence (e-mail: [email protected]; fax: + 1-202-885-2182) Received 7 August 200 I; accepted in revised form 24 February 2002 Key wm ds: Caves, Rank order statistics, Species richness, Stygobites, Troglobites Abstrac1.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Status of Freshwater Gastropods of Canada and the United States Paul D
    This article was downloaded by: [69.144.7.122] On: 24 July 2013, At: 12:35 Publisher: Taylor & Francis Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Fisheries Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ufsh20 Conservation Status of Freshwater Gastropods of Canada and the United States Paul D. Johnson a , Arthur E. Bogan b , Kenneth M. Brown c , Noel M. Burkhead d , James R. Cordeiro e o , Jeffrey T. Garner f , Paul D. Hartfield g , Dwayne A. W. Lepitzki h , Gerry L. Mackie i , Eva Pip j , Thomas A. Tarpley k , Jeremy S. Tiemann l , Nathan V. Whelan m & Ellen E. Strong n a Alabama Aquatic Biodiversity Center, Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources (ADCNR) , 2200 Highway 175, Marion , AL , 36756-5769 E-mail: b North Carolina State Museum of Natural Sciences , Raleigh , NC c Louisiana State University , Baton Rouge , LA d United States Geological Survey, Southeast Ecological Science Center , Gainesville , FL e University of Massachusetts at Boston , Boston , Massachusetts f Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources , Florence , AL g U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service , Jackson , MS h Wildlife Systems Research , Banff , Alberta , Canada i University of Guelph, Water Systems Analysts , Guelph , Ontario , Canada j University of Winnipeg , Winnipeg , Manitoba , Canada k Alabama Aquatic Biodiversity Center, Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources , Marion , AL l Illinois Natural History Survey , Champaign , IL m University of Alabama , Tuscaloosa , AL n Smithsonian Institution, Department of Invertebrate Zoology , Washington , DC o Nature-Serve , Boston , MA Published online: 14 Jun 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation
    CONSERVATION ecapod crustaceans in the families Astacidae, recreational and commercial bait fisheries, and serve as a Cambaridae, and Parastacidae, commonly known profitable and popular food resource. Crayfishes often make as crayfishes or crawfishes, are native inhabitants up a large proportion of the biomass produced in aquatic of freshwater ecosystems on every continent systems (Rabeni 1992; Griffith et al. 1994). In streams, sport except Africa and Antarctica. Although nearly worldwide fishes such as sunfishes and basses (family Centrarchidae) in distribution, crayfishes exhibit the highest diversity in may consume up to two-thirds of the annual production of North America north of Mexico with 338 recognized taxa crayfishes, and as such, crayfishes often comprise critical (308 species and 30 subspecies). Mirroring continental pat- food resources for these fishes (Probst et al. 1984; Roell and terns of freshwater fishes (Warren and Burr 1994) and fresh- Orth 1993). Crayfishes also contribute to the maintenance of water mussels (J. D. Williams et al. 1993), the southeastern food webs by processing vegetation and leaf litter (Huryn United States harbors the highest number of crayfish species. and Wallace 1987; Griffith et al. 1994), which increases avail- Crayfishes are a significant component of aquatic ecosys- ability of nutrients and organic matter to other organisms. tems. They facilitate important ecological processes, sustain In some rivers, bait fisheries for crayfishes constitute an Christopher A. Taylor and Melvin L. Warren, Jr. are cochairs of the Crayfish Subcommittee of the AFS Endangered Species Committee. They can be contacted at the Illinois Natural History Survey, Center for Biodiversity, 607 E. Peabody Drive, Champaign, IL 61820, and U.S.
    [Show full text]