DOCSLIB.ORG

Water Management in Community Forestry

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Water Management in Community forestry: Case study of Lamatar VDC, Nepal By PRATISTHA LAXMI TAMRAKAR A thesis submitted in the fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Masters of Philosophy FACULTY OF SCIENCE SCHOOL OF BIOLOGICAL EARTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES NSW 2052, AUSTRALIA APRIL 2015 PLEASE TYPE THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES Thesis/Dissertation Sheet Surname or Family name: Tamrakar First name: Pratistha Other name/s: Abbreviation for degree as given in the University calendar: MPhil School: Biological Earth and Environmental Sciences Faculty: Institute of Environmental Studies Title: Water Management in Community Forestry Abstract 350 words maximum: (PLEASE TYPE) The connection between forest and watershed has been well studied in the field of forestry science. However, the social facet of this field is yet to be thoroughly understood and studied. In Nepal, community forestry is playing a crucial role in maintaining the health of watersheds which act as a crucial source of water in the mid hills. Managing these watersheds and rivers is fundamental towards providing quality water to the community. Despite a growing body of knowledge on forest and water, the needs and concerns of managing these resources remain largely unaddressed. An important question then to emerge from this is - can community that is effectively managing forests, manage the water resources emerging from the forests? This thesis aims to investigate opportunities and challenges of water management in community forestry system. Specifically, it analyses whether and how water in the community forests is being managed at present. The study was designed using a mixed methods approach of qualitative and quantitative research. Qualitative data collection included a questionnaire survey (99 completed the questionnaire), conducting semi-structured interviews (20 interviews), attending community workshops and initiating informal discussions. The quantitative data collection also involved conducting a water quality analysis on two water streams within the Lamtar catchment. The analysis of the data indicated that the community manages water in Lamatar in a number of different ways, and with some hierarchies and different roles affecting access. User groups manage water on a small scale providing water to the community. However, within community forestry, water management is not a prime responsibility. This is because a) there is no legislation to require water management within community forestry, b) no concrete knowledge as to how water management can be done through community forestry; c) unlike other forest products such as timber, herbs, fodder, water does not belong to the FUGs, it belongs to the state, and d) there is no legislative or institutional linkage between forest and water. This thesis emphasises that community forestry users manage water on a small scale and informally-based on local norms, but they do not have legislative support or ownership for management to do so. This is leading to issues of inadequate water supply and water quality. There is a need for co-ordinated policy for integrated natural resource management to enhance sustainable resource conservation. Declaration relating to disposition of project thesis/dissertation I hereby grant to the University of New South Wales or its agents the right to archive and to make available my thesis or dissertation in whole or in part in the University libraries in all forms of media, now or here after known, subject to the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. I retain all property rights, such as patent rights. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis or dissertation. I also authorise University Microfilms to use the 350 word abstract of my thesis in Dissertation Abstracts International (this is applicable to doctoral theses only). The University recognises that there may be exceptional circumstances requiring restrictions on copying or conditions on use. Requests for restriction for a period of up to 2 years must be made in writing. Requests for a longer period of restriction may be considered in exceptional circumstances and require the approval of the Dean of Graduate Research. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Date of completion of requirements for Award: COPYRIGHT STATEMENT ‘I hereby grant the University of New South Wales or its agents the right to archive and to make available my thesis or dissertation in whole or part in the University libraries in all forms of media, now or here after known, subject to the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. I retain all proprietary rights, such as patent rights. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis or dissertation. I also authorise University Microfilms to use the 350 word abstract of my thesis in Dissertation Abstract International (this is applicable to doctoral theses only). I have either used no substantial portions of copyright material in my thesis or I have obtained permission to use copyright material; where permission has not been granted I have applied/will apply for a partial restriction of the digital copy of my thesis or dissertation.' Signed ……………………………………………........................... Date ……………………………………………........................... AUTHENTICITY STATEMENT ‘I certify that the Library deposit digital copy is a direct equivalent of the final officially approved version of my thesis. No emendation of content has occurred and if there are any minor variations in formatting, they are the result of the conversion to digital format.’ Signed ……………………………………………........................... Date ……………………………………………........................... ORIGINALITY STATEMENT ‘I hereby declare that this submission is my own work and to the best of my knowledge it contains no materials previously published or written by another person, or substantial proportions of material which have been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma at UNSW or any other educational institution, except where due acknowledgement is made in the thesis. Any contribution made to the research by others, with whom I have worked at UNSW or elsewhere, is explicitly acknowledged in the thesis. I also declare that the intellectual content of this thesis is the product of my own work, except to the extent that assistance from others in the project's design and conception or in style, presentation and linguistic expression is acknowledged.’ Signed …………………………………………….............. Date …………………………………………….............. ABSTRACT The connection between forest and watershed has been well studied in the field of forestry science. However, the social facet of this field is yet to be thoroughly understood and studied. In Nepal, community forestry is playing a crucial role in maintaining the health of watersheds which act as a crucial source of water in the mid hills. Managing these watersheds and rivers is fundamental towards providing quality water to the community. Despite a growing body of knowledge on forest and water, the needs and concerns of managing these resources remain largely unaddressed. An important question then to emerge from this is - can community that is effectively managing forests, manage the water resources emerging from the forests? This thesis aims to investigate opportunities and challenges of water management in community forestry system. Specifically, it analyses whether and how water in the community forests is being managed at present. The study was designed using a mixed methods approach of qualitative and quantitative research. Qualitative data collection included a questionnaire survey (99 completed the questionnaire), conducting semi-structured interviews (20 interviews), attending community workshops and initiating informal discussions. The quantitative data collection also involved conducting a water quality analysis on two water streams within the Lamtar catchment. The analysis of the data indicated that the community manages water in Lamatar in a number of different ways, and with some hierarchies and different roles affecting access. User groups manage water on a small scale providing water to the community. However, within community forestry, water management is not a prime responsibility. This is because a) there is no legislation to require water management within community forestry, b) no concrete knowledge as to how water management can be done through community forestry; c) unlike other forest products such as timber, herbs, fodder, water does not belong to the FUGs, it belongs to the state, and d) there is no legislative or institutional linkage between forest and water. This thesis emphasises that ii community forestry users manage water on a small scale and informally-based on local norms, but they do not have legislative support or ownership for management to do so. This is leading to issues of inadequate water supply and water quality. There is a need for co- ordinated policy for integrated natural resource management to enhance sustainable resource conservation. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I would like to thank both of my supervisors, Dr. Daniel Robinson and Dr. Krishna Shrestha for the continuous support of my study and research; for their patience, motivation, and enthusiasm. Many thanks for the encouragement when I was ready to give up and guiding me when I was seemingly lost. They have been the best supervisors I could have asked for. Additional thanks go to Govinda Poudel from Forest
Recommended publications
  • Tables Table 1.3.2 Typical Geological Sections

    Tables Table 1.3.2 Typical Geological Sections

    Tables Table 1.3.2 Typical Geological Sections - T 1 - Table 2.3.3 Actual ID No. List of Municipal Wards and VDC Sr. No. ID-No. District Name Sr. No. ID-No. District Name Sr. No. ID-No. District Name 1 11011 Kathmandu Kathmandu Ward No.1 73 10191 Kathmandu Gagalphedi 145 20131 Lalitpur Harisiddhi 2 11021 Kathmandu Kathmandu Ward No.2 74 10201 Kathmandu Gokarneshwar 146 20141 Lalitpur Imadol 3 11031 Kathmandu Kathmandu Ward No.3 75 10211 Kathmandu Goldhunga 147 20151 Lalitpur Jharuwarasi 4 11041 Kathmandu Kathmandu Ward No.4 76 10221 Kathmandu Gongabu 148 20161 Lalitpur Khokana 5 11051 Kathmandu Kathmandu Ward No.5 77 10231 Kathmandu Gothatar 149 20171 Lalitpur Lamatar 6 11061 Kathmandu Kathmandu Ward No.6 78 10241 Kathmandu Ichankhu Narayan 150 20181 Lalitpur Lele 7 11071 Kathmandu Kathmandu Ward No.7 79 10251 Kathmandu Indrayani 151 20191 Lalitpur Lubhu 8 11081 Kathmandu Kathmandu Ward No.8 80 10261 Kathmandu Jhor Mahakal 152 20201 Lalitpur Nallu 9 11091 Kathmandu Kathmandu Ward No.9 81 10271 Kathmandu Jitpurphedi 153 20211 Lalitpur Sainbu 10 11101 Kathmandu Kathmandu Ward No.10 82 10281 Kathmandu Jorpati 154 20221 Lalitpur Siddhipur 11 11111 Kathmandu Kathmandu Ward No.11 83 10291 Kathmandu Kabresthali 155 20231 Lalitpur Sunakothi 12 11121 Kathmandu Kathmandu Ward No.12 84 10301 Kathmandu Kapan 156 20241 Lalitpur Thaiba 13 11131 Kathmandu Kathmandu Ward No.13 85 10311 Kathmandu Khadka Bhadrakali 157 20251 Lalitpur Thecho 14 11141 Kathmandu Kathmandu Ward No.14 86 10321 Kathmandu Lapsephedi 158 20261 Lalitpur Tikathali 15 11151 Kathmandu
  • Food Insecurity and Undernutrition in Nepal

    Food Insecurity and Undernutrition in Nepal

    SMALL AREA ESTIMATION OF FOOD INSECURITY AND UNDERNUTRITION IN NEPAL GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL National Planning Commission Secretariat Central Bureau of Statistics SMALL AREA ESTIMATION OF FOOD INSECURITY AND UNDERNUTRITION IN NEPAL GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL National Planning Commission Secretariat Central Bureau of Statistics Acknowledgements The completion of both this and the earlier feasibility report follows extensive consultation with the National Planning Commission, Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS), World Food Programme (WFP), UNICEF, World Bank, and New ERA, together with members of the Statistics and Evidence for Policy, Planning and Results (SEPPR) working group from the International Development Partners Group (IDPG) and made up of people from Asian Development Bank (ADB), Department for International Development (DFID), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), UNICEF and United States Agency for International Development (USAID), WFP, and the World Bank. WFP, UNICEF and the World Bank commissioned this research. The statistical analysis has been undertaken by Professor Stephen Haslett, Systemetrics Research Associates and Institute of Fundamental Sciences, Massey University, New Zealand and Associate Prof Geoffrey Jones, Dr. Maris Isidro and Alison Sefton of the Institute of Fundamental Sciences - Statistics, Massey University, New Zealand. We gratefully acknowledge the considerable assistance provided at all stages by the Central Bureau of Statistics. Special thanks to Bikash Bista, Rudra Suwal, Dilli Raj Joshi, Devendra Karanjit, Bed Dhakal, Lok Khatri and Pushpa Raj Paudel. See Appendix E for the full list of people consulted. First published: December 2014 Design and processed by: Print Communication, 4241355 ISBN: 978-9937-3000-976 Suggested citation: Haslett, S., Jones, G., Isidro, M., and Sefton, A. (2014) Small Area Estimation of Food Insecurity and Undernutrition in Nepal, Central Bureau of Statistics, National Planning Commissions Secretariat, World Food Programme, UNICEF and World Bank, Kathmandu, Nepal, December 2014.
  • Community Readiness for Self-Managed School

    Community Readiness for Self-Managed School

    1 COMMUNITY READINESS FOR SELF-MANAGED SCHOOL CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION Background of the Study The history of formal school education in Nepal begins with the establishment of Durbar School in 1853, mainly for educating children of ruling elites. Children of general public had no access to this school. In this regard, Ministry of Education [MoE] (2003) stated: “Modern education began in Nepal with the establishment of first school in 1853. However, this school was only for the members of the ruling families and their courtiers. Schooling for the general people began only after 1951 when a popular movement ended an autocratic family regime and initiated a democratic system” (p. 2). Khati (2003) argued that the Rana regime of 104 years were completely against any form of educational development, the opinion behind their motives of suppressing educational development was that the education would awaken the people and in turn weaken their power. For Khati, educations during Rana Regime were only for the chosen few of their own Rana circle and not as a right of everybody as the masses of Nepalese people were kept uneducated and illiterate. In those days, general public were deprived of education and were forced to engage in sustenance agricultural activities. However, aspirations of some people to educate their children were met to some extent by sending their children in ‘Patha sala’, ‘Gumba’ and ‘Bihar’ organized by community as guthi, caste group and religion groups. The 2 education facility that they rendered was poor in quality, and education, therefore, was also inaccessible to many. After the inception of democracy in 1951, it was realised that education system should be enhanced, where community took the first step in organizing the school for their children, which was referred as the community managed school.
  • Number of Organizations Per Cluster Gorkha Rasuwa Health 26

    Number of Organizations Per Cluster Gorkha Rasuwa Health 26

    NEPAL: Lalitpur - Operational Presence Map (as of 30 Jun 2015) As of 30 June 2015, 72 organizations are reported to be working in Lalitpur district Number of organizations per cluster Health WASH NUMBER OF ORGANI Shelter Protection Protection Education Nutrition 10 6 10 1 5 ZATIONS PER VDC 26 Gorkha No. of Org Health No data Dhading Rasuwa 1 Nuwakot Makawanpur Shelter 2 3 - 4 Sindhupalchok 5 - 6 INDIA CHINA Kabhrepalanchok No. of Org Dolakha Sindhuli Ramechhap Education No data No. of Org 1 - 2 Okhaldunga WASH 3 4 - 5 No data 6 - 26 1 Creation date: Glide number: Sources: 2 - 3 The boundaries and names shown and the desi 4 - 7 8 - 10 No. of Org 10 July 2015 EQ-2015-000048-NPL Cluster reporting No data No. of Org 1 Nutrition 2 gnations used on this map do not imply offici No data 3 4 1 2 -4 5 - 7 8 - 9 al endorsement or acceptance by the Uni No. of Org Feedback: No data [email protected] www.humanitarianresponse.info 1 ted Nations. 2 3 4 Lalitpur District List of organizations by VDC and cluster Health Protection Shelter and NFI WASH Nutrition EDUCATION VDC name JSI,TLM,UNICEF,WHO The Himalayan Innovative Society Cesvi,LWF FCA Asrang Badikhel UNICEF,WHO AA GNI,HDRVG GNI,OXFAM,UNICEF,Wateraid SDPC GNI Bhardeu JSI,UNICEF,WHO UNFPA HDRVG,LWF,MCC UNICEF SDPC Bhattedanda JSI,TLM,UNICEF,WHO HDRVG,LWF,SDC SDC,UNICEF SDPC RBF Bisangkhunarayan UNICEF IMC,OXFAM,UNICEF SDPC GNI, Restless Bukhel JSI,UNICEF,WHO UNFPA,Women's Rehabilitation Center AKF,HDRVG UNICEF SDPC Restless JSI,UNICEF,UNFPA,WHO CGNN,CWISH,Kopila Nepal ,START Cesvi,HAI,Peace
  • (Earthquake - 2072, Baishakh) District: LALITPUR

    (Earthquake - 2072, Baishakh) District: LALITPUR

    Disaster Affected Locations (Earthquake - 2072, Baishakh) District: LALITPUR 85°20'E DHADING Ü Locaton Map ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Te!ku Dobhan ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Kupandol ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Sanepa ! ! Jhamsik! hel ! ! ! P !Harihar Bhawan ! P !Chakupat ! ! ! ! Shankha! mulghat ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Patan Dhoka ! Kumb! heshwar ! !Pulchok ! ! ! ! ! ! P !Basnetgaun KATHMANDU P ! BHAKTAPUR !Mangal B!ajar Kwako ! ! ! !Zoological Garden P Patan Darbar !Balkumari ! ! ! ! P !Kumaripati !Ekantakuna ! ! ! ! ! P ! !Thaina ! N !Bagdol ! ' ! ! 0 !Gorkhu S! undhara ! !Patan Hospital 4 ! ! ° ! ! ! Imadol 7 N !Lagankhel !Nakhu ' 2 ! 0 ! ! P Dharmeshwa!r ! ! !Nakhu Bajar ! 4 Phidol ! Gwarko ! ° ! ! 7 ! 2 !Kusanti ! ! !Bistagaun Tik! athali ! P !Sarkidhik ! P P ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Satdobato P Paudelgaun !Sainbu Bhanjyang !Tikhidol !Datidol ! ! !Ochu ! ! !Khadkagaun ! LALITPUR SUB-METROPOLITAN CITY ! ! !Talchhikhel !Tallogaun ! P !Thaikot Khadka! tol ! ! !Khumaltar ! !Nakhodol ! !Kumargaun !Tutupani !Bhainsepati ! P ! ! P ! ! ! ! Sitapakha ! !Sanagaun (Siddhipur) !Narkate ! !Magargaun !Nakhipot ! ! P ! !Nakhudol ChaPk! amakal ! P P !Chasidol ! P !Borcha ! P P ! ! P ! P P !Lubhu ! P !Sano Khokana !Loyachok P ! ! Baniyagaun PP P ! PP P !Orpach P P P !Lubhu P PP ! !Khadkagaun ! ! Saphaltol !Sashambhu !Dholahiti ! !Bisnudol ! !Okhthali P P PP !Chokhel !Dhapakhel !Thulaghar ! ! ! ! Harisiddhi ! ! !Wakhat !Barko !Jainkhel P ! !Chhayasikot P ! !Simako ! P ! ! !Khokana MAHALAXMI MUNICIPALITY PP ! ! P ! ! ! Charghare ! Simthali Jyakata Dharachaur
  • Global Initiative on Out-Of-School Children

    Global Initiative on Out-Of-School Children

    ALL CHILDREN IN SCHOOL Global Initiative on Out-of-School Children NEPAL COUNTRY STUDY JULY 2016 Government of Nepal Ministry of Education, Singh Darbar Kathmandu, Nepal Telephone: +977 1 4200381 www.moe.gov.np United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Institute for Statistics P.O. Box 6128, Succursale Centre-Ville Montreal Quebec H3C 3J7 Canada Telephone: +1 514 343 6880 Email: [email protected] www.uis.unesco.org United Nations Children´s Fund Nepal Country Office United Nations House Harihar Bhawan, Pulchowk Lalitpur, Nepal Telephone: +977 1 5523200 www.unicef.org.np All rights reserved © United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) 2016 Cover photo: © UNICEF Nepal/2016/ NShrestha Suggested citation: Ministry of Education, United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) and United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Global Initiative on Out of School Children – Nepal Country Study, July 2016, UNICEF, Kathmandu, Nepal, 2016. ALL CHILDREN IN SCHOOL Global Initiative on Out-of-School Children © UNICEF Nepal/2016/NShrestha NEPAL COUNTRY STUDY JULY 2016 Tel.: Government of Nepal MINISTRY OF EDUCATION Singha Durbar Ref. No.: Kathmandu, Nepal Foreword Nepal has made significant progress in achieving good results in school enrolment by having more children in school over the past decade, in spite of the unstable situation in the country. However, there are still many challenges related to equity when the net enrolment data are disaggregated at the district and school level, which are crucial and cannot be generalized. As per Flash Monitoring Report 2014- 15, the net enrolment rate for girls is high in primary school at 93.6%, it is 59.5% in lower secondary school, 42.5% in secondary school and only 8.1% in higher secondary school, which show that fewer girls complete the full cycle of education.
  • HISTORICAL REVIEW of MAHALAXMI MUNICIPALITY: an INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT PERSPECTIVE Badal, B

    HISTORICAL REVIEW of MAHALAXMI MUNICIPALITY: an INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT PERSPECTIVE Badal, B

    HISTORICAL REVIEW OF MAHALAXMI MUNICIPALITY: AN INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT PERSPECTIVE Badal, B. P.2 Abstract The history of Mahalaxmi Municipality is starting from Ramayana era, so it is completely a historical settlement, sets back to the timeline of 5000 BC. Archeology Department of Government of Nepal had explored the place and found the symbols of stone age weapons here in Lubhu. Shringi Rishi, who organized the Putresthi Yagya (Embryological Treatment) to give the birth of Ram Laxman – the God, sons of King Dasharath of Ayodhya, India, was born in Lankuri Bhanjyang of the Municipality. Typical Newari settlements of Lubhu and Siddhipur have unique history and culture – completely different from other Newar of Kathmandu Valley. The most beautiful land like gold of Ganga Maharani is Called Lubhu in Newari. Culturally Buddhists philosophy of Nalanika Jatak is also associated with the holy land of Serang or Shringi Rishi. The study is based on personal observation, review of old literatures, and Tourism Master Plan 2017 of the municipality. Keywords: Culture, History, Mahalaxmi Municipality, Background Mahalaxmi Municipality (MM) is a historic town of Lalitpur District formed by integrating four historic villages i.e. Shringasram Lamatar, Rural Textile City with Mahalaxmi temple Lubhu, small and beautiful typical Newari settlement Siddhipur, Land of Tikeswor and Painachal Mahadev Tikathali and Land of Pearls –Motitaar Imadol. Mahalaxmi Municipality is natural unification of Lamatar, Lubhu, Siddipur, Tikathali and Imadol VDCs of Lalitpur. It is located in South West part of Kathmandu valley and in six-kilometer distance from Tribhuvan International Airport. Rayale Kushadevi of Kavre district is in east, Lalitpur metro City is in west, Godawari Municipality of Lalitpur is in South and Kathamndu Metropolitan City of Kathmandu, Madhyapur and Suryabinayak Municipalities are situated in North side of Mahalaxmi Municipality.
  • Analysis of Tomato Marketing System in Lalitpur District, Nepal

    Analysis of Tomato Marketing System in Lalitpur District, Nepal

    Analysis of Tomato Marketing System in Lalitpur District, Nepal A Research project Submitted to Van Hall Larenstein University of Applied Sciences in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master in Management of Development Specialization “International Agriculture” By Kalash Ram Chaudhary September 2010 Wageningen The Netherlands © Kalash Ram Chaudhary, 2010. All rights reserved Analysis of Tomato Marketing System in Lalitpur District, Nepal Supervisor Arnold Van Wulfften Palthe Submitted by Kalash Ram Chaudhary (Regd No. 720824322) Master’s Degree in Management of Development Specialization “International Agriculture” Van Hall Larenstein University of Applied Sciences Wageningen, the Netherlands September, 2010 Cover photo: Woman (second left) selling tomato on 4 wheeler cart “ Thela ”. Photo by Kalash Ram Chaudhary (2010) ii PERMISSION TO USE In presenting this research project in partial fulfilment of the requirements for a Postgraduate degree, I agree that the Library of this University may make it freely available for inspection. I further agree that permission for copying of this research project in any manner, in whole or in part, school purposes may be granted by Larenstein Director of Research. It is understood that any copying or publication or use of this research project of parts thereof for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. It is also understood that due recognition shall be given to me and to the University in any scholarly use which may be made of any material in my research project. Requests for permission to copy or to make other use of material in this research project in whole or part should be addressed to: Director of Research Larenstein University of Applied Sciences P.O.
  • Lalitpur - Operational Presence Map (Completed and Ongoing) [As of 30 Sep 2015]

    Lalitpur - Operational Presence Map (Completed and Ongoing) [As of 30 Sep 2015]

    NEPAL: Lalitpur - Operational Presence Map (completed and ongoing) [as of 30 Sep 2015] Lalitpur Sub Metropolitan 124 Imadol Partners in Lalitpur Sairbu Tikathali Khokana HarisiddhiSiddhipur SunakothiDhapakhel Lubhu 1-10 11-20 21-30 31-40 41-65 Bungmati Thaiba Thecho GodamchaurLamatar Jharuwarasi Bisangkhunarayan ChhampiChapagaun Dukuchhap Badikhel Godawari Protection 38 Devichaur Lele Shelter and NFI 37 Nallu Bhardeu Ghusel Health 30 Dahachok Chaughare Manikhel WASH 26 Bhattedanda Sangkhu Food Security Malta Kaleshwar 14 Bukhel Gotikhel Education 7 Ikudol Chandanpur Pyutar Early Recovery 1 Asrang Gimdi Thuladurlung IMPLEMENTING PARTNERS BY CLUSTER Early Recovery Education Food Security 1 partner 7 partners 14 partners Nb of Nb of Nb of organisations organisations organisations 1 >=5 1 >=5 1 >=5 Health Protection Shelter and NFI 30 partners 38 partners 37 partners Nb of Nb of Nb of organisations organisations organisations 1 >=5 1 >=5 1 >=5 WASH 26 partners Want to find out the latest 3W products and other info on Nepal Earthquake response? visit the Humanitarian Response website at http:www.humanitarianresponse.info/en/op Nb of organisations Note: erations/nepal Implementing partner represent the organization on the ground, in the affected district doing operational work, such as send feedback to 1 >=5 distributing food, tents, water purification kits, etc. [email protected] Creation date: 13 Sep 2015 Glide number: EQ-2015-000048-NPL Sources: Cluster reporting The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this
  • NEPAL: Lalitpur - Operational Presence Map [As of 14 July 2015]

    NEPAL: Lalitpur - Operational Presence Map [As of 14 July 2015]

    NEPAL: Lalitpur - Operational Presence Map [as of 14 July 2015] Lalitpur Sub Metropolitan Imadol Tikathali 88 Sairbu Partners working in Lalitpur Siddhipur Khokana Harisiddhi Sunakothi Dhapakhel Lubhu 1-10 11-20 21-30 31-40 41-50 Bungmati Lamatar Thecho Thaiba Godamchaur Jharuwarasi Bisangkhunarayan Dukuchhap Chhampi Chapagaun No. of implementing partners Godawari Badikhel by cluster Devichaur Lele Health 28 Nallu Bhardeu Ghusel Protection 28 Chaughare Dahachok Manikhel Shelter and NFI 26 Bhattedanda Sangkhu Malta Kaleshwar WASH 19 Bukhel Gotikhel Ikudol Education 5 Chandanpur Pyutar Early Recovery 1 Asrang Gimdi Thuladurlung Nutrition 1 IMPLEMENTING PARTNERS BY CLUSTER Early Recovery Education Health 1 partners 5 partners 28 partners Nb of Nb of Nb of organisations organisations organisations 1 .>=5 1 >=5 1 >=5 Nutrition Protection Shelter and NFI 1 partners 28 partners 26 partners Nb of Nb of Nb of organisations organisations organisations 1 >=5 1 >=5 1 >=5 WASH 19 partners Want to find out the latest 3W products and other info on Nepal Earthquake response? visit the Humanitarian Response website at Nb of http:www.humanitarianresponse.info/en/op organisations erations/nepal Note: 1 >=5 Implementing partner represent the organization on the ground, send feedback to in the affected district doing operational work, such as [email protected] distributing food, tents, water purification kits, etc. Creation date: 23 July 2015 Glide number: EQ-2015-000048-NPL Sources: Cluster reporting The boundaries and names shown and the designations
  • Initial Environmental Examination Lalit Ghumti Road (Upgrading) NEP

    Initial Environmental Examination Lalit Ghumti Road (Upgrading) NEP

    Initial Environmental Examination Lalit Ghumti Road (Upgrading) August 2017 NEP: Earthquake Emergency Assistance Project Prepared by District Coordination Committee (Lalitpur)- Central Level Project Implementation Unit – Ministry of Federals Affairs and Local Development for the Asian Development Bank. This initial environmental examination is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section on ADB’s website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. Environmental Assessment Document Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) Lalit Ghumti Road (Upgrading) August 2017 NEP: Earthquake Emergency Assistance Project Loan: 3260 Project Number: 49215-001 Prepared by the Government of Nepal for the Asian Development Bank (ADB). This Report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. The views expressed herein are those of the consultant and do not necessarily represent those of ADB’s members, Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. sfo{sf/L ;f/f+z k|:tfjs of] k|f/lDes jftfj/0fLo k/LIf0f k|ltj]bg nlntk'/ lhNnfsf] uf]bfj/L gu/kflnsf–! -tTsflng uf]bfdrf}/ uf=lj=;_ sf] la;ªv'gf/fo0f :s"n b]lv uf]bfj/L gu/kflnsf–$ -tTsflng al8v]n uf=lj=;_ sf] n]n]e~HofË hf]8\g] !$=(*! ls=dL= nfdf] x/]s df};ddf rNg] ;8s k'glg{df0f tyf k'g{:yfkgf ug{ tof/ kfl/Psf] xf] .
  • Summary Report

    Summary Report

    EARTHQUAKE EMERGENCY PROJECT (EEP) - 2015/16 i SUMMARY REPORT F F l r a i e S p n e d C N s NEPAL l S i e nc rvice Cou FRIENDS SERVICE COUNCIL NEPAL (FSCN) In Partnership with: DCA EARTHQUAKE EMERGENCY PROJECT (EEP) - 2015/16 iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Friends Service Council Nepal (FSCN) has been supporting the earthquake affected communities of Lalitpur and Bhaktapur, immediately after the earthquake till date. In this span of one year, more than one hundred thousand people have been benefited through this project covering sectors like Relief support, WASH, Shelter support, Psychosocial support, Livelihood promotion and Disaster risk management. I would like to acknowledge all the field and office staffs for their marvelous contribution for the successful completion of our Earthquake Emergency Project (EEP). I would like to express my gratitude to our partners DanChurch Aid (DCA) and Norwegian Church Aid (NCA) for believing and choosing us as an implementing partner for this emergency support project. A special thanks to the entire DCA Humanitarian Support and EEP team for their encouragement, support and cooperation throughout the project. I would also like to thank the community people, different concerned stakeholders and local government agencies for their kind cooperation and support. I would like to convey my appreciation to all our staffs, board members and local volunteers of our project areas for providing their immense contribution for the successful completing of the project. Special thanks to Mrs. Santona Devkota K.C. for her valuable guidance and support in this project. Finally, I would like to thank Mr.