DOCSLIB.ORG

Summary Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Summary Report EARTHQUAKE EMERGENCY PROJECT (EEP) - 2015/16 i SUMMARY REPORT F F l r a i e S p n e d C N s NEPAL l S i e nc rvice Cou FRIENDS SERVICE COUNCIL NEPAL (FSCN) In Partnership with: DCA EARTHQUAKE EMERGENCY PROJECT (EEP) - 2015/16 iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Friends Service Council Nepal (FSCN) has been supporting the earthquake affected communities of Lalitpur and Bhaktapur, immediately after the earthquake till date. In this span of one year, more than one hundred thousand people have been benefited through this project covering sectors like Relief support, WASH, Shelter support, Psychosocial support, Livelihood promotion and Disaster risk management. I would like to acknowledge all the field and office staffs for their marvelous contribution for the successful completion of our Earthquake Emergency Project (EEP). I would like to express my gratitude to our partners DanChurch Aid (DCA) and Norwegian Church Aid (NCA) for believing and choosing us as an implementing partner for this emergency support project. A special thanks to the entire DCA Humanitarian Support and EEP team for their encouragement, support and cooperation throughout the project. I would also like to thank the community people, different concerned stakeholders and local government agencies for their kind cooperation and support. I would like to convey my appreciation to all our staffs, board members and local volunteers of our project areas for providing their immense contribution for the successful completing of the project. Special thanks to Mrs. Santona Devkota K.C. for her valuable guidance and support in this project. Finally, I would like to thank Mr. Binaya Prakash Acharya and Mr. Manohar Karki for writing this report. Surya Bahadur Thapa Executive Chairperson Friends Service Council Nepal (FSCN) 26 April 2016. EARTHQUAKE iv EMERGENCY PROJECT (EEP) - 2015/16 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Immediately after the earthquake of 25 April 2015, FSCN in partnership with DCA started relief distribution in various areas of Lalitpur and Bhaktapur districts. With an aim to support people with integrated response and recovery programs, FSCN and DCA, along with other partners in Nepal, launched the Earthquake Emergency Project. First of all, I would like to thank our implementing partner FSCN for successful completion of this ambitious project. I am very impressed by the working modalities of FSCN because it enabled them to build a strong coordination with national and local government, various stakeholders, DMCs, DDRCs and other concerned line agencies for the effective implementation of this project in this short timeframe. Local youth mobilization was also an innovative approach adopted by FSCN for smooth running of the project. I am glad that FSCN was able to maintain good governance and transparency which are core principles of DCA, by means of proper documentation, publications, visibility and media coverage. I appreciate that FSCN is going to publish a summary report of this Earthquake Emergency Project in order to provide information to various stakeholders and to the general public about the project. I would like to convey my best wishes to the FSCN team and I hope that we will be getting the same high level of support and coordination for the reconstruction and rehabilitation of the earthquake effected communities of Lalitpur and Bhaktapur districts in a more effective way in the days to come. David Smith, Regional Representative, DanChurchAid South Asia 26 April 2016 DCA EARTHQUAKE EMERGENCY PROJECT (EEP) - 2015/16 v ACKNOWLEDGEMENT It is our great pleasure that we have successfully accomplished our 1st Act Appeal Project i.e. “Earthquake Emergency Project (EEP)” at Lalitpur and Bhaktapur districts in partnership with FSCN who have always proved themselves as a militant team. I feel that DCA hasfound a fantastic partner to implement Earthquake Emergency Project at Lalitpur and Bhaktapur right from the 3rd day of April 25 earthquake. As a DCA Coordinator, for me,it was a great learning opportunity and indeed a very good experience to work in partnership with FSCN during this EEP. We have achieved amazing results from our programme together and I have been very much impressed by the commitment, dedication and ability of FSCN team. First of all, I would like to congratulate FSCN team for effective implementation and successful completion of this project. I would like to thank all the brilliant staffs and volunteers of FSCN who worked day and night for achieving optimum results and for providing maximum benefit for the earthquake affected communities. I would like to express my sincere gratitude towards my DCA colleagues’, the matic coordinators/officers, team leader/supervises, other senior advisers and all the supporters who have supported for the success of this project through their valuable contribution in their respective areas. I would also like to acknowledge FSCN for being able to develop a strong coordination and network with the government, local bodies, stakeholders, concerned line agencies and local political parties for the smooth operation of the project. Various strategies and modalities like local youth mobilization, formation of local friends help committee, collaboration with local government and non-government bodies which were adopted by FSCN for the project implementation considering the humanitarian strategy of DCA. I am really impressed with board of FSCN and would like to extend my sincere appreciation to the entire board, management, staff and community stakeholders for their full cooperation with DCA team throughout the project. Especially, Executive Chair person of FSCN, Surya Bahadur Thapa’s dedication and passion towards his work and his wonderful leadership in this project has brought our partnership into a next level. Excited, since this summary report is one of the valuable treasure and production of our partnership. Appreciate Binaya Acharya, Manohar Karki and team of FSCN who worked to prepare and publish this project summary report which is a compiled information of all the major activities conducted by FSCN in partnership with DCA. Definitely, I think this will be an effective means ofverification and information to all and I hope this will also serve as a way forward document to other humanitarian actors in coming days as well. I wish the organization all the best for their future endeavors. SantonaDevkota K.C Project Coordinator – Bhaktapur & Lalitpur DanChurchAid South Asia 26 April 2016 DCA EARTHQUAKE EMERGENCY PROJECT (EEP) - 2015/16 vii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Friends Service Council Nepal (FSCN) is a non-profit • Hygiene kits were distributed to 1874 households. making national level non-government organization • Various school and community based hygiene working for socio-economic development, disaster risk promotion activities were conducted benefiting 13,336 management, WASH, livelihood support, good governance individuals. and human rights in Nepal since 1991. Immediately after • Cash top-up support of NRs. 10,000 was distributed the devastating earthquake of 25 April 2015, FSCN in to 3694 households who received NRs. 15,000 from partnership with DCA and NCA has been implementing government for temporary shelter construction. various programs for the earthquake affected communities • Winterization kits were distributed to 402 families. of Bhaktapur and Lalitpur districts. From the third day • 6 multi-purpose venues were established for providing after the disaster, FSCN started distributing relief materials psychosocial support and conducting various which included food baskets (as per WFP standard) and community level activities. drinking water through trucking with the support from • Numerous programs and events were conducted to DCA. Apart from these, FSCN distributed CGI sheets and provide community based psychosocial support to the food basket with the support from World Jewish Relief people of earthquake affected communities benefiting (WJR) and non-conditional cash support in partnership 10,307 individuals. with Helpage international Nepal, for the earthquake • Cash top-up support of NRs. 13,000 for livelihood affected senior citizens in order to fulfill their immediate promotion was provided to 400 selected households. requirements at the time of emergency. • Livelihood skill promotion training was provided to 317 people. Soon after the earthquake, a project named “Earthquake • 4 Disaster Management Committees (DMCs) were Emergency Project (EEP)” was launched by FSCN in formed and 2 other existing DMCs were strengthened partnership with DCA/ NCA in Laitpur and Bhaktapur by providing trainings. districts. Though Lalitpur and Bhaktapur districts are • Community based disaster management trainings were adjoining to the capital of Nepal, Kathmandu city, but our conducted at selected communities benefiting 897 response experience showed that the most remote and most individuals. vulnerable people affected by the earthquake were present Altogether 100,891 people were benefited from this project. in many areas of these two districts. The project was divided “Friends Help Group” were formed by FSCN for the into three phases: Relief support, Emergency response and identification of the most vulnerable groups, support for Recovery. project implementation and monitoring, local coordination and networking with the concerned stakeholders and The main achievements of Earthquake Emergency Project mobilization of the community people. The Friends Help are as follows: Group comprised of members of Ward Citizen Forum, • Food baskets (as per WFP
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Preparation of GPS Based Digital Profile of Godawari Municipality
    Godawari Municipality Godawari, Lalitpur Final Report Preparation of GPS based Digital Profile of Godawari Municipality Submitted to Godawari Municipality Bajrabarahi, Lalitpur, Nepal Submitted by ArchieSoft Technology Lalitpur Metropolitan City 21, Lalitpur, Nepal Phone: +977 -1-5553000 Email: [email protected] Web: www.archiesoft.com.np 1 Table of Contents Chapter 1: Project Description ............................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Background ......................................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Objective of the assignment ............................................................................................................... 4 1.3 Key Deliverables ................................................................................................................................. 5 1.4 Methodology/ process ....................................................................................................................... 5 1.5 Project Location .................................................................................................................................. 6 1.6 Time line of assignment/ study .......................................................................................................... 7 Chapter 2: Godawari Municipality an Introduction ............................................................................... 9 2.1 Background: .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tables Table 1.3.2 Typical Geological Sections
    Tables Table 1.3.2 Typical Geological Sections - T 1 - Table 2.3.3 Actual ID No. List of Municipal Wards and VDC Sr. No. ID-No. District Name Sr. No. ID-No. District Name Sr. No. ID-No. District Name 1 11011 Kathmandu Kathmandu Ward No.1 73 10191 Kathmandu Gagalphedi 145 20131 Lalitpur Harisiddhi 2 11021 Kathmandu Kathmandu Ward No.2 74 10201 Kathmandu Gokarneshwar 146 20141 Lalitpur Imadol 3 11031 Kathmandu Kathmandu Ward No.3 75 10211 Kathmandu Goldhunga 147 20151 Lalitpur Jharuwarasi 4 11041 Kathmandu Kathmandu Ward No.4 76 10221 Kathmandu Gongabu 148 20161 Lalitpur Khokana 5 11051 Kathmandu Kathmandu Ward No.5 77 10231 Kathmandu Gothatar 149 20171 Lalitpur Lamatar 6 11061 Kathmandu Kathmandu Ward No.6 78 10241 Kathmandu Ichankhu Narayan 150 20181 Lalitpur Lele 7 11071 Kathmandu Kathmandu Ward No.7 79 10251 Kathmandu Indrayani 151 20191 Lalitpur Lubhu 8 11081 Kathmandu Kathmandu Ward No.8 80 10261 Kathmandu Jhor Mahakal 152 20201 Lalitpur Nallu 9 11091 Kathmandu Kathmandu Ward No.9 81 10271 Kathmandu Jitpurphedi 153 20211 Lalitpur Sainbu 10 11101 Kathmandu Kathmandu Ward No.10 82 10281 Kathmandu Jorpati 154 20221 Lalitpur Siddhipur 11 11111 Kathmandu Kathmandu Ward No.11 83 10291 Kathmandu Kabresthali 155 20231 Lalitpur Sunakothi 12 11121 Kathmandu Kathmandu Ward No.12 84 10301 Kathmandu Kapan 156 20241 Lalitpur Thaiba 13 11131 Kathmandu Kathmandu Ward No.13 85 10311 Kathmandu Khadka Bhadrakali 157 20251 Lalitpur Thecho 14 11141 Kathmandu Kathmandu Ward No.14 86 10321 Kathmandu Lapsephedi 158 20261 Lalitpur Tikathali 15 11151 Kathmandu
    [Show full text]
  • Food Insecurity and Undernutrition in Nepal
    SMALL AREA ESTIMATION OF FOOD INSECURITY AND UNDERNUTRITION IN NEPAL GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL National Planning Commission Secretariat Central Bureau of Statistics SMALL AREA ESTIMATION OF FOOD INSECURITY AND UNDERNUTRITION IN NEPAL GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL National Planning Commission Secretariat Central Bureau of Statistics Acknowledgements The completion of both this and the earlier feasibility report follows extensive consultation with the National Planning Commission, Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS), World Food Programme (WFP), UNICEF, World Bank, and New ERA, together with members of the Statistics and Evidence for Policy, Planning and Results (SEPPR) working group from the International Development Partners Group (IDPG) and made up of people from Asian Development Bank (ADB), Department for International Development (DFID), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), UNICEF and United States Agency for International Development (USAID), WFP, and the World Bank. WFP, UNICEF and the World Bank commissioned this research. The statistical analysis has been undertaken by Professor Stephen Haslett, Systemetrics Research Associates and Institute of Fundamental Sciences, Massey University, New Zealand and Associate Prof Geoffrey Jones, Dr. Maris Isidro and Alison Sefton of the Institute of Fundamental Sciences - Statistics, Massey University, New Zealand. We gratefully acknowledge the considerable assistance provided at all stages by the Central Bureau of Statistics. Special thanks to Bikash Bista, Rudra Suwal, Dilli Raj Joshi, Devendra Karanjit, Bed Dhakal, Lok Khatri and Pushpa Raj Paudel. See Appendix E for the full list of people consulted. First published: December 2014 Design and processed by: Print Communication, 4241355 ISBN: 978-9937-3000-976 Suggested citation: Haslett, S., Jones, G., Isidro, M., and Sefton, A. (2014) Small Area Estimation of Food Insecurity and Undernutrition in Nepal, Central Bureau of Statistics, National Planning Commissions Secretariat, World Food Programme, UNICEF and World Bank, Kathmandu, Nepal, December 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Readiness for Self-Managed School
    1 COMMUNITY READINESS FOR SELF-MANAGED SCHOOL CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION Background of the Study The history of formal school education in Nepal begins with the establishment of Durbar School in 1853, mainly for educating children of ruling elites. Children of general public had no access to this school. In this regard, Ministry of Education [MoE] (2003) stated: “Modern education began in Nepal with the establishment of first school in 1853. However, this school was only for the members of the ruling families and their courtiers. Schooling for the general people began only after 1951 when a popular movement ended an autocratic family regime and initiated a democratic system” (p. 2). Khati (2003) argued that the Rana regime of 104 years were completely against any form of educational development, the opinion behind their motives of suppressing educational development was that the education would awaken the people and in turn weaken their power. For Khati, educations during Rana Regime were only for the chosen few of their own Rana circle and not as a right of everybody as the masses of Nepalese people were kept uneducated and illiterate. In those days, general public were deprived of education and were forced to engage in sustenance agricultural activities. However, aspirations of some people to educate their children were met to some extent by sending their children in ‘Patha sala’, ‘Gumba’ and ‘Bihar’ organized by community as guthi, caste group and religion groups. The 2 education facility that they rendered was poor in quality, and education, therefore, was also inaccessible to many. After the inception of democracy in 1951, it was realised that education system should be enhanced, where community took the first step in organizing the school for their children, which was referred as the community managed school.
    [Show full text]
  • WASH Cluster Nepal 4W - May 12Th 2015
    WASH Cluster Nepal 4W - May 12th 2015 Please find following the analysis of the 4W data – May 12th Introduction (Round 2) This is the second round of the 4W analysis. As this is the second round and still early in the emergency response, many agencies are still planning their interventions and caseloads, hence much of the data is understandably incomplete. In the coming week/s we will receive far more comprehensive partner data and will be able to show realistic gaps. In addition, we are receiving better affected population data and there are many ongoing assessments, the results of which will help us to understand both the response data and the affected population data and enable us to deliver a far more profound analysis of the WASH response. Please assist us as we have a lot of information gaps in the data provided so far and hence the maps are not yet providing a true picture of the response. We would like to quickly move to VDC mapping including planned/reached beneficiaries. Since the first round of reporting, agencies have provided substantially more VDC‐level data – as of today, of 740 WASH activities identified, 546 of these (74%) are matched to an identified VDC ‐ this is a big improvement from last week (which had VDC data for 192 of 445 activities, or 43%) The Highlights ・ 47 Organisations – number of organisations that reported in Round 1 and/or Round 2 of the WASH 4W ・ 206 VDCs – where WASH interventions taking place/planned (in 15 districts) 4W – WASH May 12th 2015 Water0B Spread of water activities ‐ targeted Temporary
    [Show full text]
  • Number of Organizations Per Cluster Gorkha Rasuwa Health 26
    NEPAL: Lalitpur - Operational Presence Map (as of 30 Jun 2015) As of 30 June 2015, 72 organizations are reported to be working in Lalitpur district Number of organizations per cluster Health WASH NUMBER OF ORGANI Shelter Protection Protection Education Nutrition 10 6 10 1 5 ZATIONS PER VDC 26 Gorkha No. of Org Health No data Dhading Rasuwa 1 Nuwakot Makawanpur Shelter 2 3 - 4 Sindhupalchok 5 - 6 INDIA CHINA Kabhrepalanchok No. of Org Dolakha Sindhuli Ramechhap Education No data No. of Org 1 - 2 Okhaldunga WASH 3 4 - 5 No data 6 - 26 1 Creation date: Glide number: Sources: 2 - 3 The boundaries and names shown and the desi 4 - 7 8 - 10 No. of Org 10 July 2015 EQ-2015-000048-NPL Cluster reporting No data No. of Org 1 Nutrition 2 gnations used on this map do not imply offici No data 3 4 1 2 -4 5 - 7 8 - 9 al endorsement or acceptance by the Uni No. of Org Feedback: No data [email protected] www.humanitarianresponse.info 1 ted Nations. 2 3 4 Lalitpur District List of organizations by VDC and cluster Health Protection Shelter and NFI WASH Nutrition EDUCATION VDC name JSI,TLM,UNICEF,WHO The Himalayan Innovative Society Cesvi,LWF FCA Asrang Badikhel UNICEF,WHO AA GNI,HDRVG GNI,OXFAM,UNICEF,Wateraid SDPC GNI Bhardeu JSI,UNICEF,WHO UNFPA HDRVG,LWF,MCC UNICEF SDPC Bhattedanda JSI,TLM,UNICEF,WHO HDRVG,LWF,SDC SDC,UNICEF SDPC RBF Bisangkhunarayan UNICEF IMC,OXFAM,UNICEF SDPC GNI, Restless Bukhel JSI,UNICEF,WHO UNFPA,Women's Rehabilitation Center AKF,HDRVG UNICEF SDPC Restless JSI,UNICEF,UNFPA,WHO CGNN,CWISH,Kopila Nepal ,START Cesvi,HAI,Peace
    [Show full text]
  • (Earthquake - 2072, Baishakh) District: LALITPUR
    Disaster Affected Locations (Earthquake - 2072, Baishakh) District: LALITPUR 85°20'E DHADING Ü Locaton Map ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Te!ku Dobhan ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Kupandol ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Sanepa ! ! Jhamsik! hel ! ! ! P !Harihar Bhawan ! P !Chakupat ! ! ! ! Shankha! mulghat ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Patan Dhoka ! Kumb! heshwar ! !Pulchok ! ! ! ! ! ! P !Basnetgaun KATHMANDU P ! BHAKTAPUR !Mangal B!ajar Kwako ! ! ! !Zoological Garden P Patan Darbar !Balkumari ! ! ! ! P !Kumaripati !Ekantakuna ! ! ! ! ! P ! !Thaina ! N !Bagdol ! ' ! ! 0 !Gorkhu S! undhara ! !Patan Hospital 4 ! ! ° ! ! ! Imadol 7 N !Lagankhel !Nakhu ' 2 ! 0 ! ! P Dharmeshwa!r ! ! !Nakhu Bajar ! 4 Phidol ! Gwarko ! ° ! ! 7 ! 2 !Kusanti ! ! !Bistagaun Tik! athali ! P !Sarkidhik ! P P ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Satdobato P Paudelgaun !Sainbu Bhanjyang !Tikhidol !Datidol ! ! !Ochu ! ! !Khadkagaun ! LALITPUR SUB-METROPOLITAN CITY ! ! !Talchhikhel !Tallogaun ! P !Thaikot Khadka! tol ! ! !Khumaltar ! !Nakhodol ! !Kumargaun !Tutupani !Bhainsepati ! P ! ! P ! ! ! ! Sitapakha ! !Sanagaun (Siddhipur) !Narkate ! !Magargaun !Nakhipot ! ! P ! !Nakhudol ChaPk! amakal ! P P !Chasidol ! P !Borcha ! P P ! ! P ! P P !Lubhu ! P !Sano Khokana !Loyachok P ! ! Baniyagaun PP P ! PP P !Orpach P P P !Lubhu P PP ! !Khadkagaun ! ! Saphaltol !Sashambhu !Dholahiti ! !Bisnudol ! !Okhthali P P PP !Chokhel !Dhapakhel !Thulaghar ! ! ! ! Harisiddhi ! ! !Wakhat !Barko !Jainkhel P ! !Chhayasikot P ! !Simako ! P ! ! !Khokana MAHALAXMI MUNICIPALITY PP ! ! P ! ! ! Charghare ! Simthali Jyakata Dharachaur
    [Show full text]
  • Imcompilation20150516.Pdf
    National Figures National Summary Item Status Blankets Household kits (e.. Tarpaulin Tents Tool kits and fixin.. Completed distributions 7,911 13,601 91,209 488 778 In pipeline (procurement/on.. 12,140 196,580 660,401 6,262 67,930 In-Country Stock/ Ongoing .. 3,650 29,257 132,328 1,877 400 Planned (funded) 2,200 53,627 29,327 5,646 6,400 Planned (subject to funding) 5,950 1,579 Grand Total 25,901 293,065 919,215 14,273 77,087 Item Blankets Household kits (ex.. Tarpaulin Tents Tool kits and fixings Planned distributions by date Planned distributions by date 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 9 Household kits Tool kits and 5 5 5 5 9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 1 1 1 1 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 l / / / / / l 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 Comp Date 5 5 5 5 2 / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / (excluding tar.. Blankets tarpaulin Tents fixings u 0 0 0 0 1 6 5 6 1 2 3 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 2 / / / / / N 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 8 1 0 1 0 / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / Null 118,667 315,12094 6,169 47,000 0 1 2 2 3 3 5 5 5 5 6 6 8 0 1 3 4 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 3 03/06/2015 2,400 05/05/2015 1,400 300K 05/06/2015 2,856 05/11/2015 2,972 05/12/2015 356 200K 06/03/2015 4,800 e u l 06/05/2015 10,000 96,352 40 a V 08/05/15 6,000 6,000 08/05/2015 43,800 100K 10/05/2015 400 400 11/05/15 7,000 11/05/2015 37,000 600 74,300 7,500 0K 13/05/2015 200 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) s s s s s s s s s s s s s n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i s s s s s s s s t t t t t t t l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
    [Show full text]
  • Saath-Saath Project
    Saath-Saath Project Saath-Saath Project THIRD ANNUAL REPORT August 2013 – July 2014 September 2014 0 Submitted by Saath-Saath Project Gopal Bhawan, Anamika Galli Baluwatar – 4, Kathmandu Nepal T: +977-1-4437173 F: +977-1-4417475 E: [email protected] FHI 360 Nepal USAID Cooperative Agreement # AID-367-A-11-00005 USAID/Nepal Country Assistance Objective Intermediate Result 1 & 4 1 Table of Contents List of Acronyms .................................................................................................................................................i Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................ 1 I. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 4 II. Program Management ........................................................................................................................... 6 III. Technical Program Elements (Program by Outputs) .............................................................................. 6 Outcome 1: Decreased HIV prevalence among selected MARPs ...................................................................... 6 Outcome 2: Increased use of Family Planning (FP) services among MARPs ................................................... 9 Outcome 3: Increased GON capacity to plan, commission and use SI ............................................................ 14 Outcome
    [Show full text]
  • Qlzxcvbnmrtyuiopasdfghjklzxcv
    qlzxcvbnmrtyuiopasdfghjklzxcv Planning Report: Rehabilitation, recovery, and strengthening/ expansion of Family Planning (FP) services (with a focus on Long-Acting Reversible Contraception- LARC) in five earthquake affected districts has been prepared by the Ministry of Health (MoH), Government of Nepal (GoN) with financial support from UKaid and technical and financial assistance from NHSSP. This report is submitted in accordance with contract payment deliverable FP2: Overall plan for conducting comprehensive mobile camps and mobilising Visiting Providers (VPs) completed for all five districts. 1 ACRONYMS ANM auxiliary nurse midwife BC birthing centre CFWC Chhetrapati Family Welfare Centre CPR contraceptive prevalence rate DC district coordinator DHO district health office FCHV female community health volunteer FHD Family Health Division FP family planning HF health facility HFI health facility in-charge HFOMC health facility operation and management committee HLD high level disinfected HP health post IEC information, education and communication IUCD intrauterine contraceptive device LARC long acting reversible contraceptive MoU memorandum of understanding MWRA married woman of reproductive age MSI Marie Stopes International NHSSP Nepal Health Sector Support Programme NMS Nepal Medical Standard NSV non-scalpel vasectomy PHCC primary health care centre PMWH Paropakar Maternity and Women’s Hospital QI quality improvement SBA skilled birth attendant VDC village development committee VP visiting provider 2 1. Contents 1. Purpose of this
    [Show full text]
  • Overview Report of the Nepal Cultural Emergency Crowdmap Initiative 19 May 2015 Acknowledgements
    Overview Report of the Nepal Cultural Emergency Crowdmap Initiative 19 May 2015 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS As the news of a massive earthquake in Nepal broke out, ICCROM, ICOMOS-ICORP and their combined network of heritage professionals decided to put up the Kathmandu Cultural Emergency Crowdmap to gather on-the-ground reports in order to provide a consistent situation overview. This initiative was successful in gathering valuable information thanks to the contributions of several institutions namely, the Smithsonian Institution, USA, the Disaster Relief Task Force of the International Council of Museums (ICOM-DRTF) and UNESCO office in Kathmandu, Nepal. Social media reports of cultural heritage professionals working in Nepal helped in gathering reports of damage to cultural heritage beyond the Kathmandu Valley. In particular the core team of the crowdmap wishes to acknowledge the invaluable contributions of: Dina Bangdel, Randolph Langenbach, Prof. Arun Menon, Tapash Paul, Neelam Pradhananga, Swosti Rajbhandari, Sudarshan Raj Tiwari, Rakshya Rayamajhi, Kai Weise. Crowdmap core team: Céline Allain, Emergency response coordinator, National Library of France / FAC 2015 Participant Jennifer Copithorne, ICCROM Jonathan Eaton, Cultural Heritage without Borders–Albania / FAC 2015 Participant Rohit Jigyasu, President, ICOMOS-ICORP Elke Selter, Cultural heritage consultant Aparna Tandon, Crowdmap initiative coordinator, ICCROM Report compiled and edited by: Jonathan Eaton, CHwB–Albania Disclaimer: The contents of this report are based on crowd sourced information and individual reports on damage to cultural sites and collections in Nepal, and which remain to be verified through detailed on-site assessments. 2 STRUCTURE OF THE REPORT 4 A. CRISIS overview 5 B. KEY ACTORS 6 C. Nepal’S cultural HeritaGE 6 D.
    [Show full text]
  • Nepal Earthquake, 18 May, 2015 CDIR No
    Nepal Earthquake, 18 May, 2015 CDIR No. 23 BLUF – Implications to PACOM The Logistics Cluster reports that there is continuous improvement in the flow of cargo from the airport. Previous bottlenecks appear to be alleviated. (WFP) The current focus of the humanitarian logistics response is on extending forward hubs and assessing alternative means of relief transport. (WFP) The requirement for the JTF-505's unique capabilities is quickly drawing to a close as alternate ground and air logistics capabilities become available. (USAPCOM) JTF-505 is transitioning Crisis Response Group (CRG) tasks to the Nepalese civil aviation authority and other organizations. (USPACOM) Nepal Earthquake – Stats & Facts Background: On April 25 a 7.8 magnitude earthquake struck Nepal, with epicenter in Lamjung District, located 81 km northwest of Kathmandu with a depth of 15 km. On May 12, a 7.3 magnitude aftershock struck near Chilankha village in Dolakha District. A total of 32 districts were affected, including those still recovering from the April 25 earthquake. Impact As of May 18, there are a total of 488,789 destroyed houses and 267,477 damaged houses. This number does not include houses Key Concerns & Trends damaged or destroyed from the May 12 aftershock. 14 districts in Central and Western regions are the most affected. (OCHA) Organizations are starting to ship humanitarian cargo into Nepal via There are a total of 234 displacement sites identified across 134 Calcutta, which is currently taking an average of 7 to 10 days. The Village Development Committees (OCHA) Nepal Ministry of Home Affairs and the Nepal Consulate in Calcutta are working to expedite procedures.
    [Show full text]