Final Evaluation of the Francommunautés Virtuelles Program

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Final Evaluation of the Francommunautés Virtuelles Program Final Evaluation of the Francommunautés Virtuelles Program FINAL REPORT February 2008 Tabled and approved at DEC on June 9, 2008 This publication is available upon request in accessible formats. Contact: Multimedia Services Section Communications and Marketing Branch Industry Canada Room 264D, West Tower 235 Queen Street Ottawa ON K1A 0H5 Tel.: 613-948-1554 Fax: 613-947-7155 Email: [email protected] Permission to Reproduce Except as otherwise specifically noted, the information in this publication may be reproduced, in part or in whole and by any means, without charge or further permission from Industry Canada, provided that due diligence is exercised in ensuring the accuracy of the information reproduced; that Industry Canada is identified as the source institution; and that the reproduction is not represented as an official version of the information reproduced, nor as having been made in affiliation with, or with the endorsement of, Industry Canada. For permission to reproduce the information in this publication for commercial redistribution, please email: [email protected] Cat. No. Iu4-137/2008E-PDF ISBN 978-1-100-10135-4 60485 Aussi offert en français sous le titre Évaluation finale du programme Francommunautés virtuelle. Translated version. In instances of inconsistency, the French version shall prevail. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................. i 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 1 2.0 BACKGROUND ................................................................................................... 2 2.1 History .................................................................................................................. 2 2.2 Program profile ..................................................................................................... 2 2.3 Program management and governance ............................................................... 4 2.3.1 Advisory Committee................................................................................... 4 2.3.2 Program team ............................................................................................ 4 2.3.3 National Selection Committee.................................................................... 5 2.4 Funding ................................................................................................................ 5 2.5 Recent evaluations ............................................................................................... 6 3.0 METHODOLOGY AND APPROACH................................................................... 7 3.1 Evaluation questions addressed........................................................................... 7 3.2 Evaluation methods .............................................................................................. 7 3.2.1 Roles and responsibilities .......................................................................... 7 3.2.2 Evaluation calendar and strategy............................................................... 7 3.2.3 Description of the lines of inquiry ............................................................... 7 3.3 Method limitations................................................................................................. 9 4.0 RESULTS........................................................................................................... 11 4.1 Relevance .......................................................................................................... 11 4.1.1 Program definition and direction .............................................................. 11 4.1.2 Better identification of winning needs ...................................................... 13 4.1.3 Who does Francommunautés virtuelles target?....................................... 14 4.2 Degree of success in achieving results .............................................................. 15 4.2.1 Project selection process......................................................................... 15 4.2.2 Program accessibility............................................................................... 16 4.2.3 Governance structure .............................................................................. 19 4.2.4 Competitive process management .......................................................... 20 4.3 Cost-effectiveness .............................................................................................. 23 4.3.1 CFA needs assessment and dissemination of information ........................ 23 4.3.2 Budgetary review....................................................................................... 24 4.3.3 Creation of networks and partnerships ...................................................... 24 5.0 CONCLUSION ................................................................................................... 26 APPENDIX 1 – Evaluation matrix APPENDIX 2 – Evaluation participants APPENDIX 3 – Case study analysis APPENDIX 4 – List of documents reviewed APPENDIX 5 – List of interviewees APPENDIX 6 – Interview Guides APPENDIX 7 – Survey questionnaire NOTE: Appendices are available via an Access to Information Request. List of Figures Figure 1 Distribution of Amounts Awarded, by Sector................................................... 12 Figure 2 Funding Distribution by Component and Competition ..................................... 17 Figure 3 FV Governance Structure ............................................................................... 19 List of Tables Table 1: FV Program Funding from 1998 to 2008 ........................................................... 5 Table 2: Operating and Maintenance Expenses and Salaries......................................... 5 Table 3: Number and Value of Contribution Agreements per Competition...................... 6 Table 4: Number of Individuals Interviewed .................................................................... 8 Table 5: Characteristics of the Test Population (Case Studies) ...................................... 8 Table 6: Project Selection Criteria................................................................................. 16 Table 7: Number of Contribution Agreements Granted to Provinces and Territories .... 18 Table 8: Answers from responding recipients that commented on directives, support, and the attainment of initial objectives.............................. 21 Table 9: Case Studies: Success factors, difficulties and local repercussions identified.......................................................................................................... 22 Table 10: Number of partnerships developed or built by category ................................ 25 Audit and Evaluation Branch Final Evaluation for the Francommunautés Virtuelles Program –Final Report February 2008 LIST OF ACRONYMS AC Francommunautés virtuelles program Advisory Committee AEB Audit and Evaluation Branch CBED Community-based economic development CFAs Francophone and Acadian communities1 CFDC Community Futures Development Corporation CIUS Canadian Internet Use Survey EDOLMC Economic Development of Official Language Minority Communities FCFA Fédération des communautés francophones et acadiennes du Canada FV Francommunautés virtuelles IC Industry Canada ICT Information and communications technology IHAB Information Highway Applications Branch NPO Non-profit organization OLMCs Official Language Minority Communities PCH Canadian Heritage RDÉE Réseau de développement économique et d'employabilité SME Small and medium-sized enterprise TBS Treasury Board Secretariat 1 These represent all Francophone and Acadian communities (CFAs), whether they are minorities or not. Consequently, Official Language Minority Communities (OLMCs) are included in the CFAs. Audit and Evaluation Branch Final Evaluation for the Francommunautés Virtuelles Program –Final Report February 2008 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Context and objectives of the evaluation This final evaluation of the Francommunautés virtuelles program (FV) was carried out by Groupe-conseil baastel ltée on behalf of the Audit and Evaluation Branch (AEB) of Industry Canada (IC). Since 1998, this program has provided financial support for projects that aim to meet the specific needs of Francophone and Acadian communities (CFAs) in using information and communications technologies (ICTs). This evaluation takes into account the history of the program, while focusing on the activities undertaken between 2003 and 2007. It is intended to measure the success of the program. Methodology In order to carry out the evaluation, the evaluation team and the steering committee chose four lines of inquiry. They conducted an exhaustive documentation review, 31 interviews with key stakeholders, 9 case studies and an electronic survey of participants in the competitive process. Key findings The Francommunautés virtuelles program has had positive effects on communities. Nonetheless, there are several grey areas in the definition of FV, and this lack of clarity is reflected in its implementation on various levels. The program mission and objectives seem relevant, but are very broad. Some participants consider it essential that the funded projects help develop or maintain their competitiveness in a knowledge-based economy, whereas others emphasize the importance of bridging the digital divide. This dichotomy between innovation
Recommended publications
  • Redalyc. the Digital Divide: Canada?S Access As a 97 Neo
    Revista Mexicana de Estudios Canadienses (nueva época) Asociación Mexicana de Estudios sobre Canadá, A.C. [email protected] ISSN (Versión impresa): 1405-8251 MÉXICO 2008 Martin R. Dowding THE DIGITAL DIVIDE: CANADA’S ACCESS AS A 97 NEO-LIBERAL COMMODITY Revista Mexicana de Estudios Canadienses (nueva época), primavera-verano, número 015 Asociación Mexicana de Estudios sobre Canadá, A.C. Culiacán, México pp. 97-110 Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina y el Caribe, España y Portugal Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México http://redalyc.uaemex.mx THE DIGITAL DIVIDE: CANADA’S A CCESS AS A NEO-LIBERAL COMMODITY MARTIN R. DOWDING Abstract The term “Digital Divide” has had and continues to have many different definitions, depending on who is observing the problem, where they are observing the problem, and who is provid- ing the definition. Neo-liberal economic analysts prefer to limit the problem to ICTS as a market- value commodity driven by technological determinism, seeing profitable manufacture, highly concentrated sales, and high adoption rates as a way to overcome the “divide.” Educators and literacy specialists, on the other hand, prefer a broader interpretation, which includes the universal use-value of ICTS in the creation of a better-educated society in which citizens can contribute more than their taxes. This paper defines several “divides” and recognizes existing 97 and long-standing alternatives which might overcome the divides. Key words: Digital divide, connectivity, Canada, universal access. THE FIRST WAVE AND COMMODITY-VALUE espite promises of universal access, the Digital Divide is a persistent Dphenomenon in the increasing dominance of Information and Communica- tion Technology (ICT).
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Divides in Canada's Northern Indigenous Communities
    Running Head: DIGITAL DIVIDES IN CANADA’S NORTHERN COMMUNITIES 1 Digital Divides in Canada’s Northern Indigenous Communities: Supports and Barriers to Digital Adoption Trish Fontaine University of Alberta Submitted to the Faculty of Extension University of Alberta In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Communications and Technology September 16, 2017 DIGITAL DIVIDES IN CANADA’S NORTHERN COMMUNITIES 2 Abstract My research explores digital divides and digital adoption in Canada’s Northern communities. I highlight the implications that settler colonialism, government policies and industry hold for digital adoption initiatives underway in communities in the Northwest Territories (NWT) of Canada. I look at themes around digital adoption that surfaced from semi- structured interviews done with six Participants – key informants involved in Northern technology development – in this research. To interpret interview data, I use a holistic framework, the “whole community” approach to digital adoption (O’Donnell et al. 2016). The importance of self-determination, empowerment, community involvement, youth, training and the First Mile approach to digital technology adoption are some of the themes found in the data analysis. I use the three levels of the Whole Community framework to organize this discussion, separating it into: Community Members, Community Organizations, and Infrastructure. Based on my research, I propose adding a fourth level to the model, Policy and Funding, and include it my data analysis. Keywords: digital adoption, digital divide, Northern broadband, whole community, Indigenous digital technology, self-determination, Ownership Control Access and Possession (OCAP®)1. 1 The First Nations Information and Governance Centre received registered trademark status for the OCAP® principles in 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping Toronto's Digital Divide
    Mapping Toronto’s Digital Divide January 2021 Sam Andrey | M.J. Masoodi Nisa Malli | Selasi Dorkenoo REPORT CONTRIBUTORS PROJECT COLLABORATORS Sam Andrey, Director of Policy & Research, Leslie Chan, Knowledge Equity Lab, University Ryerson Leadership Lab of Toronto Karim Bardeesy, Executive Director, Ryerson Dr. Natalie Coulter, Institute for Digital Leadership Lab Literacies, York University Zaynab Choudhry, Design Lead Dr. Wendy Cukier, Ted Rogers School of Information Technology Management, Ryerson Selasi Dorkenoo, Spatial Analyst University Sarah Doyle, Director of Policy + Research, BII+E Dr. Mohamed Elmi, Ted Rogers School of Information Technology Management, Ryerson Braelyn Guppy, Marketing and Communications University Lead, Ryerson Leadership Lab Hamish Goodwin, Technology Services Division, Nisa Malli, Workstream Manager, Innovative + City of Toronto Inclusive Economy, BII+E Caroline Grammer, Faculty of Community Mohammed (Joe) Masoodi, Policy Analyst, Services, Seneca College Ryerson Leadership Lab Dr. Paolo Granata, Media Ethics Lab, University of Toronto Kevin Hudes, Ted Rogers School of Information Technology Management, Ryerson University Nivedita Lane, Community Outreach and Workforce Development, Humber College Dr. Catherine Middleton, Ted Rogers School of Information Technology Management, Ryerson This project was made possible in part by funding University from the City of Toronto. In June 2020, the Mayor’s Economic Support and Recovery Task Force identified Marco Narduzzo, Technology Services Division, opportunities to collaboratively undertake research to City of Toronto address urgent COVID-19 needs with Toronto’s eight Alice Xu, Technology Services Division, City of universities and colleges through the CivicLabTO Toronto program. We also wish to thank and acknowledge the cooperation, insights and data sharing from collaborators at ACORN Canada, Computers for Success Canada, Maytree Foundation, People for Education, the Toronto Catholic District School Board, the Toronto District School Board and the Toronto Public Library.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping Toronto's Digital Divide
    Mapping Toronto’s Digital Divide January 2021 Sam Andrey | M.J. Masoodi Nisa Malli | Selasi Dorkenoo REPORT CONTRIBUTORS PROJECT COLLABORATORS Sam Andrey, Director of Policy & Research, Leslie Chan, Knowledge Equity Lab, University Ryerson Leadership Lab of Toronto Karim Bardeesy, Executive Director, Ryerson Dr. Natalie Coulter, Institute for Digital Leadership Lab Literacies, York University Zaynab Choudhry, Design Lead Dr. Wendy Cukier, Ted Rogers School of Information Technology Management, Ryerson Selasi Dorkenoo, Spatial Analyst University Sarah Doyle, Director of Policy + Research, BII+E Dr. Mohamed Elmi, Ted Rogers School of Information Technology Management, Ryerson Braelyn Guppy, Marketing and Communications University Lead, Ryerson Leadership Lab Hamish Goodwin, Technology Services Division, Nisa Malli, Workstream Manager, Innovative + City of Toronto Inclusive Economy, BII+E Caroline Grammar, Faculty of Community Mohammed (Joe) Masoodi, Policy Analyst, Services, Seneca College Ryerson Leadership Lab Dr. Paolo Granata, Media Ethics Lab, University of Toronto Kevin Hudes, Ted Rogers School of Information Technology Management, Ryerson University Nivedita Lane, Community Outreach and Workforce Development, Humber College Dr. Catherine Middleton, Ted Rogers School of Information Technology Management, Ryerson This project was made possible in part by funding University from the City of Toronto. In June 2020, the Mayor’s Economic Support and Recovery Task Force identified Marco Narduzzo, Technology Services Division, opportunities to collaboratively undertake research to City of Toronto address urgent COVID-19 needs with Toronto’s eight Alice Xu, Technology Services Division, City of universities and colleges through the CivicLabTO Toronto program. We also wish to thank and acknowledge the cooperation, insights and data sharing from collaborators at ACORN Canada, Computers for Success Canada, Maytree Foundation, People for Education, the Toronto Catholic District School Board, the Toronto District School Board and the Toronto Public Library.
    [Show full text]
  • Broadband Study
    Appendix A TORONTO BROADBAND STUDY Prepared for the City of Toronto by: FONTUR International Inc. MDB Insight Inc. October 2017 [FINAL v4] Table of Contents GLOSSARY .............................................................................................................................................................. 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................................... 6 1 WHAT IS BROADBAND, AND WHY IS IT IMPORTANT? ................................................................................... 8 DEFINING BROADBAND ................................................................................................................................................... 8 INVESTMENT IN BROADBAND ACCESSIBILITY & AFFORDABILITY AS A KEY ELEMENT TO SMART CITY DEVELOPMENT & JOB CREATION .... 9 RESPONDING TO THE PRESSURES OF THE DIGITAL ECONOMY ................................................................................................ 12 2 BROADBAND TRENDS .................................................................................................................................. 14 BROADBAND OVER LTE (WIRELESS)................................................................................................................................. 14 5TH GENERATION CARRIER WIRELESS (5G) ........................................................................................................................ 15 INTERNET OF THINGS (IOT) ...........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Of Analogue: Access to Cbc/Radio-Canada Television Programming in an Era of Digital Delivery
    THE END(S) OF ANALOGUE: ACCESS TO CBC/RADIO-CANADA TELEVISION PROGRAMMING IN AN ERA OF DIGITAL DELIVERY by Steven James May Master of Arts, Ryerson University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2008 Bachelor of Applied Arts (Honours), Ryerson University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 1999 Bachelor of Administrative Studies (Honours), Trent University, Peterborough, Ontario, Canada, 1997 A dissertation presented to Ryerson University and York University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Program of Communication and Culture Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2017 © Steven James May, 2017 AUTHOR'S DECLARATION FOR ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION OF A DISSERTATION I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this dissertation. This is a true copy of the dissertation, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I authorize Ryerson University to lend this dissertation to other institutions or individuals for the purpose of scholarly research. I further authorize Ryerson University to reproduce this dissertation by photocopying or by other means, in total or in part, at the request of other institutions or individuals for the purpose of scholarly research. I understand that my dissertation may be made electronically available to the public. ii ABSTRACT The End(s) of Analogue: Access to CBC/Radio-Canada Television Programming in an Era of Digital Delivery Steven James May Doctor of Philosophy in the Program of Communication and Culture Ryerson University and York University, 2017 This dissertation
    [Show full text]
  • Industry Canada Broadband Economic Impact Study Final Report
    INDUSTRY CANADA BROADBAND ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY FINAL REPORT August 2005 Rural Development Institute, Brandon University Brandon University established the Rural Development Institute in 1989 as an academic research centre and a leading source of information on issues affecting rural communities in Western Canada and elsewhere. RDI functions as a not-for-profit research and development organization designed to promote, facilitate, coordinate, initiate and conduct multi-disciplinary academic and applied research on rural issues. The Institute provides an interface between academic research efforts and the community by acting as a conduit of rural research information and by facilitating community involvement in rural development. RDI projects are characterized by cooperative and collaborative efforts of multi-stakeholders. The Institute has diverse research affiliations, and multiple community and government linkages related to its rural development mandate. RDI disseminates information to a variety of constituents and stakeholders and makes research information and results widely available to the public either in printed form or by means of public lectures, seminars, workshops and conferences. For more information, please visit www.brandonu.ca/rdi. Industry Canada Broadband Economic Impact Study Final Report August 31, 2005 Submitted to: Information Highway Applications Branch Industry Canada 155 Queen Street, Room 1430 Ottawa ON K1A 0H5 Prepared by: Dr. Robert C. Annis, Rural Development Institute, Brandon University, Dr. Jim McNiven, School of Business, Dalhousie University, and Mr. Michael Curri, President, Strategic Networks Group Submitted by: Robert Annis, Ph.D., Director Rural Development Institute Brandon University Lower Concourse, McMaster Hall Complex 270 – 18th Street Brandon, Manitoba R7A 6A9 Telephone (204) 571-8515 Email: [email protected] Acknowledgements In addressing the study deliverables, we are thankful for the guidance and support of a number of individuals within Industry Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Reducing the Digital Divide in Rural Manitoba: a Proposed Framework
    Journal of Rural and Community Development Journal of Rural and Community Development Reducing the Digital Divide in Rural Manitoba: A Proposed Framework Authors: Bill Ashton* & Roger Girard Citation: Ashton, B., & Girard, R. (2013). Reducing the Digital Divide in Manitoba: A Proposed Framework. In W. Ashton & A. S. Carson (Eds.), [Special issue]. The Journal of Rural and Community Development, 8(2), 62-78. Publisher: Rural Development Institute, Brandon University. Editor: Dr. Doug Ramsey * corresponding author Open Access Policy: This journal provides open access to all of its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. Such access is associated with increased readership and increased citation of an author's work. ISSN: 1712-8277 © Journal of Rural and Community Development www.jrcd.ca Journal of Rural and Community Development Reducing the Digital Divide in Rural Manitoba: A Proposed Framework William (Bill) Ashton Director, Rural Development Institute Brandon University Brandon, Manitoba, Canada [email protected] Roger Girard Manitoba e-Health [email protected] Abstract Outside of larger centres across Canada public policies and corporate investments have left 2 million rural households under-served with broadband network capacity. After nearly 20 years of activities this gap may be closing, yet front line strategists suggest our rural digital divide will persist for years to come. A supplemental to the current approach is needed to connect these rural areas, yet it may require different technologies and social capital investment. This paper brings the reader inside a Manitoba working group (Forum) to reveal how applied research, assisted in formulating an integrated action framework that proposes an approach to provide access to users and expand the uses of broadband while calling for leadership and utilizing social marketing.
    [Show full text]
  • TD Economics
    LITERACY MATTERS: UNLOCKING THE LITERACY POTENTIAL OF ABORIGINAL PEOPLES IN CANADA June 20, 2013 TD Economics Sonya Gulati Senior Economist TD Economics | www.td.com/economics TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary . .3 Introduction . 6 Literacy: an evolving definition . .6 Why literacy proficiency is so critical today . 7 Literacy proficiency in the context of Canada’s Aboriginal peoples . 8 The International Adult Literacy and Skills Survey . 8 The literacy gap between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal adults in Canada . 10 a) Literacy proficiency across the four domains . 11 b) Regional trends . 12 c) Literacy proficiency across age cohorts . 12 d) Literacy proficiency across gender . .13 e) Literacy, educational attainment and job demands . .14 The high price of low literacy . 14 a) Labour market and education outcomes . .14 b) More frequent interaction with the justice system . 15 c) Poorer health outcomes . 15 Barriers to overcoming low literacy levels held by Aboriginal peoples . 16 1) Geographic barriers . .16 2) Social and economic barriers . 18 3) Cultural barriers . 19 4) A more holistic view of literacy . .19 5) Education outcome gaps: education system complexities and under-funding . 21 6) Linguistic differences . 23 7) Too few teachers and other role models . .24 8) Other individual barriers . 25 Unlocking the literacy potential for Aboriginal peoples . 27 1) Engaging parents works to dispel the stigma associated with education and improve literacy . 27 2) Making Aboriginal students feel valued and welcomed will lead to improved educational outcomes . .28 3) Incorporating Aboriginal approaches to learning into curriculum and teaching methods will increase the literacy levels . .29 4) Increasing access and targeted funding for literacy programs and supports for those Aboriginal peoples in rural and remote areas.
    [Show full text]
  • D3: Proceedings of the Digital Divide Doctoral Students
    Table of Contents Workshop invitation ................................................................................ section A [Introduction] What is the Digital Divide? Kate Williams (workshop chair) Information University of Michigan, USA [email protected] ...........................................................................................B [The Computer] Computers, System Design and the Digital Divide: Meeting Information Needs Kent Unruh Library and Information Science University of Washington, USA [email protected].................................................................................. C [Open Source] What is Open Source Software? Cliff Lampe Information University of Michigan, USA [email protected] ............................................................................................... D [Research Methods] Measuring the U.S. Digital Divide: Quantative Survey Methods Salvador Rivas Sociology University of Michigan, USA [email protected] ..............................................................................................E [Digital Divide Policy in the U.S.] Framing Federal Policies and Programs to Bridge the Technology Gap Dara O'Neil Public Policy Georgia Institute of Technology, USA [email protected] ..................................................................................F [Education and Learning] Justifying ICTs in schools: A Comparative Study of the Use of Digital Divide Categories in Educational Policies in Latin America Florencio Ceballos Schaulsohn Sociology Ecole de
    [Show full text]
  • The State of Digital Literacy in Canada, Beyond the Public School System; This Would Include Mapping All Existing Public and Private Programs
    THE STATE OF DIGITAL LITERACY APRIL 2017 WORKING PAPER IN CANADA A LITERATURE REVIEW Authors Tea Hadziristic Author + Policy Researcher Tea is an author and policy researcher. She has spent several years working as a researcher and policy analyst in Europe, the Balkans and Canada. She holds an MSc in international relations theory from the London School of Economics and Political Science. She was involved in writing a wide-ranging literature review for the Brookfield Institute for Innovation + Entrepreneurship's State of Digital Literacy in Canada project. @teotchka Academia.edu: https://lse.academia.edu/TeaHadziristic The Brookfield Institute for Innovation + For more information, visit Entrepreneurship (BII+E) is a new, independent brookfieldinstitute.ca. and nonpartisan institute, housed within Ryerson @BrookfieldIIE University, that is dedicated to making Canada the best country in the world to be an innovator or an /BrookfieldIIE entrepreneur. The Brookfield Institute for Innovation BII+E supports this mission in three ways: + Entrepreneurship insightful research and analysis; testing, piloting and prototyping projects; which informs BII+E’s leadership and advocacy on behalf of innovation and entrepreneurship across the country. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 4 Main Findings + Conclusion 5 Background 5 Digital literacy in Canada 5 Gaps in skills, innovation, and productivity in the Canadian economy 9 THEME 1: Defining Digital Literacy 12 Pinning down a working definition 18 THEME 2: The Digital Economy 20 THEME 3: Pedagogy
    [Show full text]
  • Building the Digital Talent Pool and Skills for Tomorrow
    Improving Canada’s Digital Advantage: Building the Digital Talent Pool and Skills for Tomorrow Research Team: Wendy Cukier Shelley Smarz Amelie Baillargeon Tom Rylett Mariam Munawar Cheryl Hsu Charity Hannan Margaret Yap Diversity Institute, Ted Rogers School of Management, Ryerson University About Ryerson’s Diversity Institute Ryerson University’s Diversity Institute undertakes research with respect to diversity in the workplace and its application to improve practices in organizations. The goal of the Institute is to promote new, interdisciplinary knowledge and practice about diversity with respect to gender, ethnicity, sexual orientation, and people with disabilities. The Diversity Institute works in partnership with industry, government, not-for-profits and academics to: - Research existing practices and evaluate programs; - Explore barriers to full participation in the workplace; - Develop fact-based policies and programs to attract, motivate and develop under-represented groups in the workplace; and - Provide customized training to support development of diversity strategies. The Diversity Institute develops strategies that are customized to an organization’s context, stage of development on the diversity continuum and specific needs. Our approach is customized in terms of content and delivery including lectures, simulations and exercised to meet learning objectives. The Diversity Institute has also focused attention on the evaluation of a wide range of approaches including diversity and anti-racism training. Contact Us The Diversity
    [Show full text]