DOCSLIB.ORG

Cover: David Hicks Spotlight: Jill Oberman Clay Culture: Ernabella Arts Glaze: Low-Fire Majolica, High-Fire Wood

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cover: David Hicks Spotlight: Jill Oberman Clay Culture: Ernabella Arts Glaze: Low-Fire Majolica, High-Fire Wood Cover: David Hicks Spotlight: Jill Oberman Clay Culture: Ernabella Arts Glaze: Low-fire Majolica, High-fire Wood PC-20 Blue Rutile over Cone 5-6 PC-32 Albany Slip Brown PC-21 PC-33 PC-42 Arctic Blue Iron Lustre Seaweed over over over PC-32 PC-32 PC-32 Layering Albany Slip Albany Slip Albany Slip Brown Brown Brown PC-23 PC-34 PC-48 Indigo Float Light Sepia Art Deco over over Green PC-32 PC-32 over Albany Slip Albany Slip PC-32 Brown Brown Albany Slip Brown PC-31 PC-35 PC-55 Oatmeal Oil Spot Chun Plum over over over PC-32 PC-32 PC-32 Albany Slip Albany Slip Albany Slip Brown Brown Brown PC-32 Layering Notes: Apply two over PC-61 layers of base coat. Apply two layers Textured of top coat. (Let dry between coats.) Amber over PC-32 PC-32 Albany Slip Brown To learn more: www.layeringpcs.info Bailey Gas and Electric Kilns Manual and Programmable Gas Kilns Flint Institute of the Arts “Our new Bailey PRO 54 Auto-Fire Shuttle kiln has deliv- ered superior consistent glaze results right from our first Cone 10 reduction firing. Students and faculty have been thrilled with the quality of the reduction glazes. “Talk about fuel efficiency, the Bailey PRO 54 has a stack- ing capacity of 54 cu. ft., and the fuel cost for a Cone 10 firing is only $25! Our Bailey is saving us fuel, money and is good for the environment. “The FIA Art School is a non- profit museum school with an annual enroll- ment of 1,500. The ceramics program is one of the largest in Michigan and vital to the Flint community.” Jeff Hageman, Jeff Garrett, and Guy Adamec Bailey “Double Insulated” Top Loaders, have 32% less heat loss compared to con- ventional electric kilns. Revolutionary Design There are over 12 outstanding features that make the Bailey Thermal Logic Electric an amazing design. It starts with the Bailey innovative “Quick-Change” Element Holder System. And there’s much more. Look to Bailey innovation when you want the very best products and value. Top Loaders, Front Loaders, & Shuttle Electrics Bailey Pottery Equip. Corp., PO Box 1577, Kingston NY 12402 Professionals Know www.baileypottery.com Toll Free: (800) 431-6067 Direct: (845) 339-3721 Fax: (845) 339-5530 thewww.ceramicsmonthly.org Difference. january 2014 1 Jonathan Mess January 17 - February 15, 2014 jane hartsook gallery greenwich house pottery 2013 - 2014 Exhibition Series 16 jones street, nyc CERAMICS greenwichhousepottery.org NOW This program is supported by the Windgate Charitable Foundation, by public funds from the New York City Department of Cultural Affairs in partnership with the City Council, Greenwich Collection Ltd., the Milton and Sally Avery Arts Foundation, and New York State Council on the Arts with the support of Governor Andrew Cuomo and the New York State Legislature. 2 january 2014 www.ceramicsmonthly.org www.ceramicsmonthly.org january 2014 3 4 january 2014 www.ceramicsmonthly.org $100 AM AC O ® g la z e r e b a t e ) s n o i s n e 1 t x 0 e g le y l a n e o ti a p r (o w a rr an ty www.ceramicsmonthly.org january 2014 5 new 13 fabulous MONTHLY Editorial glazes added to our line of [email protected] telephone: (614) 794-5869 amazing cone 6 glazes fax: (614) 891-8960 editor Sherman Hall managing editor Jessica Knapp associate editor Holly Goring administrative specialist Linda Stover technical editor Dave Finkelnburg online editor Jennifer Poellot Harnetty Advertising/Classifieds [email protected] telephone: (614) 794-5834 fax: (614) 891-8960 classifi[email protected] telephone: (614) 794-5843 advertising manager Mona Thiel advertising services Jan Moloney Marketing telephone: (614) 794-5809 marketing manager Steve Hecker audience development manager Sandy Moening Subscriptions/Circulation customer service: (800) 342-3594 [email protected] Design/Production production associate Erin Pfeifer design Boismier John Design digital design specialist Melissa Bury Editorial and advertising offices 600 Cleveland Ave., Suite 210 Westerville, Ohio 43082 Publisher Charles Spahr Editorial Advisory Board Linda Arbuckle; Professor, Ceramics, Univ. of Florida Serving potters since 1975! Scott Bennett; Sculptor, Birmingham, Alabama Dick Lehman; Studio Potter, Indiana Quality Products! Excellent Service! Great Prices! Meira Mathison; Director, Metchosin Art School, Canada Phil Rogers; Potter and Author, Wales Visit our web site to see many exciting new products Jan Schachter; Potter, California Mark Shapiro; Worthington, Massachusetts www.tuckerspottery.com 1-800-304-6185 Susan York; Santa Fe, New Mexico Ceramics Monthly (ISSN 0009-0328) is published monthly, except July and August, by Ceramic Publications Company; a subsidiary of The American Ceramic Society, 600 Cleveland Ave., Suite 210, Westerville, Ohio 43082; www.ceramics.org. Periodicals No other oval kiln can match postage paid at Westerville, Ohio, and additional mailing offices. Opinions expressed are those of the contributors and do the features of the Cone Art not necessarily represent those of the editors or The American Ceramic Society. The publisher makes no claim as to the food safety of pub- BX4227D Oval ! lished glaze recipes. Readers should refer to MSDS (material safety data sheets) for all raw materials, and should take all appropriate recommended safety measures, according to toxicity ratings. The original true cone 10 kiln subscription rates: One year $34.95, two years $59.95, three years $89.95. Canada: One year $49, two years $89, since 1982 three years $135. International: One year $60, two years $99, three years $145. back issues: When available, back issues are $7.50 each, 32% less plus $3 shipping/handling; $8 for expedited shipping (UPS 2-day air); and $9 for shipping outside North America. Allow HEAT LOSS 4–6 weeks for delivery. change of address: Please give us four weeks advance notice. Send the magazine address label as well as your new address to: Ceramics Monthly, Circulation Department, P.O. Box 2.5” brick 15699, North Hollywood, CA 91615-5699. contributors: Writing and photographic guidelines plus 1” are available online at www.ceramicsmonthly.org. insulation indexing: Visit the Ceramics Monthly website at Double Wall www.ceramicsmonthly.org to search an index of article titles and Construction artists’ names. Feature articles are also indexed in the Art Index, daai (design and applied arts index). copies: Authorization to photocopy items for internal • Massive 16.5 cubic feet. or personal use beyond the limits of Sections 107 or 108 of the U.S. Copyright Law is granted by The American Ceramic • 3.5” thick walls Society, ISSN 0009-0328, provided that the appropriate fee • 4” thick lid and floor. is paid directly to Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Dr., Danvers, MA 01923, USA; (978) 750-8400; • Patented lid lifter. www.copyright.com. Prior to photocopying items for classroom • Element in floor for more use, please contact Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. This consent does not extend to copying items for general even firing distribution, or for advertising or promotional purposes, or to republishing items in whole or in part in any work in any format. • 3 zone Bartlett control at no Please direct republication or special copying permission requests extra charge to the Publisher, The Ceramic Publications Company; a subsidiary of The American Ceramic Society, 600 Cleveland Ave., Suite 210, • Sectional design so easy to move Westerville, Ohio 43082, USA. postmaster: Send address changes to Ceramics Monthly, P.O. Box 15699, North Hollywood, CA 91615-5699. Form 3579 www.coneartkilns.com requested. Copyright © 2014, The Ceramic Publications Company; a subsidiary 1-800-304-6185 of The American Ceramic Society. All rights reserved. www.ceramicsmonthly.org 6 january 2014 www.ceramicsmonthly.org www.ceramicsmonthly.org january 2014 7 contentsjanuary 2014 volume 62, number 1 editorial 10 From the Editor Sherman Hall exposure 12 Images from Current and Upcoming Exhibitions reviews 46 Léopold L. Foulem: The Object is also a Sign The visual presence of Foulem’s sculptures unravel slowly, in stages, and though he imbues the objects with his own meanings, the viewers’ interpretations of subject, object, material, and associations are just as important. Reviewed by Matthew Kangas techno file 56 Frits by Dave Finkelnburg Frits are a wonderful material that potters just don’t use enough of. We’re a frugal bunch, so once we heard that they were “expensive,” we quickly turned the other way. But that initial expense could save you money in the long run. Find out how. tips and tools 58 Depth and Field by Jim Wylder Two tips for the price of one. Learn a trick for gauging the thickness of your feet or bottoms while throwing and trimming and a tip for evening out your rims. resources 77 Call for Entries Information on submitting work for exhibitions, fairs, and festivals. 78 Classifieds Looking to buy? Looking to sell? Look no further. 79 Index to Advertisers spotlight 80 A Successful Residency 16 Jill Oberman, director at Carbondale Clay Center in Carbondale, Colorado discusses the role of a residency in an artist’s career. 8 january 2014 www.ceramicsmonthly.org clay culture 18 Ernabella in Jingdezhen by Heidi McKenzie Two artists from a small town in central Australia travelled to Jingdezhen for a residency. The resulting work combines their own unique style with techniques and compositions learned from the Chinese potters to tell their stories. studio visit 26 Matt Schiemann, St. Petersburg, Florida Splitting studio time between two spaces can be a logistical headache, but the perks definitely outweigh the challenges. features 30 Transitioning Environments Six sculptors and installation artists share first-hand accounts of their thought processes and approaches to making work that focus on changes and transitions in physical, social, and artistic environments.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • David Hicks, Mamdouh Habib and the Limits of Australian Citizenship
    9/17/2015 b o r d e r l a n d s e­journal limits of australian citizenship vol 2 no 3 contents VOLUME 2 NUMBER 3, 2003 David Hicks, Mamdouh Habib and the limits of Australian Citizenship Binoy Kampmark University of Queensland I will continue to take an interest in the well­being of Mr Hicks as an Australian citizen to ensure that he is being treated humanely. Alexander Downer, Answer to Question on notice, 18 March 2003. 1. Citizenship is delivered in a brown paper bag at Australian ceremonies. You apply beforehand, and, if lucky, you are asked to attend a ceremony, where you are invited to take an oath (whether to God or otherwise), and witness the spectacle of having citizenship thrust upon you. ‘There has never been a better time to become an Australian citizen’ is marked on the package, which is signed by the Immigration Minister. Brown bags signify this entire process: we await the displays, the cameo aboriginal troupe intent on welcoming the naturalised citizen with a fire ceremony that misfires (or never fires), a lady with a speech impediment who deputises for the minister for Citizenship, and the various tiers of government expounding the virtues of civic responsibility. In short, the entire ceremony is a generous self­mocking; it is citizenship as comedy, a display of cultural symbols that are easily interchanged and shifted. The mocking of citizenship lies at the centre of Australia’s discourse on what it means to be an Australian citizen. It is parodic; it does not take itself seriously, which, some might argue, is its great strength.
    [Show full text]
  • Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law — Volume 18, 2015 Correspondents’ Reports
    YEARBOOK OF INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW — VOLUME 18, 2015 CORRESPONDENTS’ REPORTS 1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Contents Overview – United States Enforcement of International Humanitarian Law ............................ 1 Cases – United States Federal Court .......................................................................................... 3 Cases – United States Military Courts – Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces (CAAF) ...... 4 Cases — United States Military Courts – United States Army ................................................. 4 Cases — United States Military Courts – United States Marine Corps .................................... 5 Issues — United States Department of Defense ........................................................................ 6 Issues — United States Army .................................................................................................... 8 Issues —United States Navy .................................................................................................... 11 Issues — United States Marine Corps ..................................................................................... 12 Overview – United States Detention Practice .......................................................................... 12 Detainee Challenges – United States District Court ................................................................ 13 US Military Commission Appeals ........................................................................................... 16 Court of Appeals for the
    [Show full text]
  • CTC Sentinel 4
    JULY 2011 . VOL 4 . ISSUE 7 COMBATING TERRORISM CENTER AT WEST POINT CTC SentineL OBJECTIVE . RELEVANT . RIGOROUS Contents The JRTN Movement and Iraq’s FEATURE ARTICLE 1 The JRTN Movement and Iraq’s Next Insurgency Next Insurgency By Michael Knights By Michael Knights REPORTS 6 Anwar al-`Awlaqi’s Disciples: Three Case Studies By Alexander Meleagrou-Hitchens 10 Will Al-Qa`ida and Al-Shabab Formally Merge? By Leah Farrall 12 The Somali Diaspora: A Key Counterterrorism Ally By Major Josh Richardson 15 David Hicks’ Memoir: A Deceptive Account of One Man’s Journey with Al-Qa`ida By Ken Ward 17 Hizb al-Tahrir: A New Threat to the Pakistan Army? By Arif Jamal 20 The Significance of Fazal Saeed’s Defection from the Pakistani Taliban By Daud Khattak JRTN leader Izzat Ibrahim al-Duri, seen here in 1999. - Photo by Salah Malkawi/Getty Images 22 Recent Highlights in Terrorist Activity he stabilization of iraq This article argues that one driver for 24 CTC Sentinel Staff & Contacts has become wedged on a the ongoing resilience, or even revival, plateau, beyond which further of Sunni militancy is the growing improvement will be a slow influence of the Jaysh Rijal al-Tariq al- Tprocess. According to incident metrics Naqshabandi (JRTN) movement, which compiled by Olive Group, the average has successfully tapped into Sunni Arab monthly number of insurgent attacks fear of Iraq’s Shi`a-led government and between January and June 2011 was the country’s Kurdish population, while 380.1 The incident count in January offering an authentic Iraqi alternate to About the CTC Sentinel was 376, indicating that incident levels al-Qa`ida in Iraq (AQI).
    [Show full text]
  • Religion and Militancy in Pakistan and Afghanistan
    Religion and Militancy in Pakistan and Afghanistan in Pakistan and Militancy Religion a report of the csis program on crisis, conflict, and cooperation Religion and Militancy in Pakistan and Afghanistan a literature review 1800 K Street, NW | Washington, DC 20006 Project Director Tel: (202) 887-0200 | Fax: (202) 775-3199 Robert D. Lamb E-mail: [email protected] | Web: www.csis.org Author Mufti Mariam Mufti June 2012 ISBN 978-0-89206-700-8 CSIS Ë|xHSKITCy067008zv*:+:!:+:! CHARTING our future a report of the csis program on crisis, conflict, and cooperation Religion and Militancy in Pakistan and Afghanistan a literature review Project Director Robert L. Lamb Author Mariam Mufti June 2012 CHARTING our future About CSIS—50th Anniversary Year For 50 years, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) has developed practical solutions to the world’s greatest challenges. As we celebrate this milestone, CSIS scholars continue to provide strategic insights and bipartisan policy solutions to help decisionmakers chart a course toward a better world. CSIS is a bipartisan, nonprofit organization headquartered in Washington, D.C. The Center’s 220 full-time staff and large network of affiliated scholars conduct research and analysis and de- velop policy initiatives that look into the future and anticipate change. Since 1962, CSIS has been dedicated to finding ways to sustain American prominence and prosperity as a force for good in the world. After 50 years, CSIS has become one of the world’s pre- eminent international policy institutions focused on defense and security; regional stability; and transnational challenges ranging from energy and climate to global development and economic integration.
    [Show full text]
  • The Current Detainee Population of Guantánamo: an Empirical Study
    © Reuters/HO Old – Detainees at XRay Camp in Guantanamo. The Current Detainee Population of Guantánamo: An Empirical Study Benjamin Wittes and Zaahira Wyne with Erin Miller, Julia Pilcer, and Georgina Druce December 16, 2008 The Current Detainee Population of Guantánamo: An Empiricial Study Table of Contents Executive Summary 1 Introduction 3 The Public Record about Guantánamo 4 Demographic Overview 6 Government Allegations 9 Detainee Statements 13 Conclusion 22 Note on Sources and Methods 23 About the Authors 28 Endnotes 29 Appendix I: Detainees at Guantánamo 46 Appendix II: Detainees Not at Guantánamo 66 Appendix III: Sample Habeas Records 89 Sample 1 90 Sample 2 93 Sample 3 96 The Current Detainee Population of Guantánamo: An Empiricial Study EXECUTIVE SUMMARY he following report represents an effort both to document and to describe in as much detail as the public record will permit the current detainee population in American T military custody at the Guantánamo Bay Naval Station in Cuba. Since the military brought the first detainees to Guantánamo in January 2002, the Pentagon has consistently refused to comprehensively identify those it holds. While it has, at various times, released information about individuals who have been detained at Guantánamo, it has always maintained ambiguity about the population of the facility at any given moment, declining even to specify precisely the number of detainees held at the base. We have sought to identify the detainee population using a variety of records, mostly from habeas corpus litigation, and we have sorted the current population into subgroups using both the government’s allegations against detainees and detainee statements about their own affiliations and conduct.
    [Show full text]
  • Afghanistan ORBAT
    COALITION COMBAT AND ADVISORY FORCES IN AFGHANISTAN AFGHANISTAN ORDER OF BATTLE BY WESLEY MORGAN February 1, 2016 This document describes the composition and placement of U.S. and other Western forces in Afghanistan down to battalion level. It includes advisory and ?white? special operations units, as well as many of the units that support them: artillery, engineers, explosive ordnance disposal, aviation, but not some other categories such as logistics, medical, and intelligence units, and ?black? special operations forces. Some of the organizational changes that accompanied the December 2014 transition from NATO?s International Security Assistance Force to the Resolute Support Mission and from the U.S. Operation Enduring Freedom to Operation Freedom?s Sentinel remain unclear which U.S. units, for example, fall under Operation Freedom?s Sentinel but not under the Resolute Support Mission. Resolute Support Mission / United States Forces - Afghanistan (Gen. Mick Nicholson, USA) - Camp Resolute Support, Kabul TF Red Warrior / 1-187 Infantry (Lt. Col. Josh Bookout, USA) - Bagram Airfield; Theater Reserve Force 1 Kabul Security Force (Brigadier Ian Thomas, UK) - Camp Souter, Kabul; force protection for Resolute Support facilities and personnel in Kabul 2 1 Royal Irish Regiment (UK) - Camp Souter, Kabul; British element of Kabul Protection Unit 3 TF White Currahee / 2-506 Infantry (USA) - New Kabul Compound; U.S. element of Kabul Protection Unit 4 Special Operations Joint Task Force - Afghanistan / NATO Special Operations Component Command
    [Show full text]
  • Guantánamo and Its Aftermath
    Guantánamo and Its Aftermath u.s. detention and interrogation practices and their impact on former detainees November 2008 Human Rights Center International Human Rights Law Clinic In partnership with University of California, Berkeley University of California, Berkeley Center for Constitutional Rights Guantánamo and Its Aftermath u.s. detention and interrogation practices and their impact on former detainees Laurel E. Fletcher Eric Stover with Stephen Paul Smith Alexa Koenig Zulaikha Aziz Alexis Kelly Sarah Staveteig Nobuko Mizoguchi November 2008 Human Rights Center University of California, Berkeley International Human Rights Law Clinic University of California, Berkeley, School of Law In partnership with Center for Constitutional Rights ISBN# 978-0-9760677-3-3 Human Rights Center and International Human Rights Law Clinic, University of California, Berkeley Cover photos: Louie Palu/ZUMA Design: Melanie Doherty Design, San Francisco Human Rights Center, University of California, Berkeley The Human Rights Center promotes human rights and international justice worldwide and trains the next generation of human rights researchers and advocates. We believe that sustainable peace and devel- opment can be achieved only through efforts to prevent human rights abuses and hold those responsible for such crimes accountable. We use empirical research methods to investigate and expose serious viola- tions of human rights and international humanitarian law. In our studies and reports, we recommend specific policy measures that should be taken by governments and international organizations to protect vulnerable populations in times of war and political and social upheaval. For more information, please visit hrc.berkeley.edu. International Human Rights Law Clinic, University of California, Berkeley, School of Law The International Human Rights Law Clinic (IHRLC) designs and implements innovative human rights projects to advance the struggle for justice on behalf of individuals and marginalized communities through advocacy, research, and policy development.
    [Show full text]
  • I Would Like to Join Amnesty International. Copyright, but May Be Reproduced by „ Any Method Without Fee for Advocacy, Please Send Me Details
    Close Guantánamo symbol of injustice undreds of men of many different nationalities have national security. Access to lawyers is perceived as Hbeen transported to the USA’s offshore prison camp detrimental to the interrogation process. Access to the at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba. At every stage of their ordeal, courts is seen as disruptive of military operations. their dignity, humanity and Arbitrary detention has been the result. “The United States Government will work to fundamental rights have advance human dignity in word and deed, been denied. Five years on, hundreds of men are still held in Guantánamo. None has been tried. None has appeared speaking out for freedom and against The first detainees were in court. All, in Amnesty International’s opinion, are violations of human rights.” flown from Afghanistan to unlawfully detained. Many have been tortured or ill- National Security Strategy of the USA, March 2002 Guantánamo in January 2002 treated, whether in Afghanistan or elsewhere prior to – hooded, shackled and tied their transfer to Guantánamo, or during their transfer, or down like cargo. They were the first of more than 750 as part of the interrogation process in the base, or just people of some 45 nationalities who would be taken to through the harshness of the Guantánamo regime – the base in this way, among them children as young as 13. isolating, indefinite and punitive. By association, their They have included people who were simply in the wrong families too have suffered the cruelty of this virtually place at the wrong time, dozens of whom were handed incommunicado island incarceration.
    [Show full text]
  • A Plan to Close Guantánamo and End the Military Commissions Submitted to the Transition Team of President-Elect Obama From
    A Plan to Close Guantánamo and End the Military Commissions submitted to the Transition Team of President-elect Obama from the American Civil Liberties Union Anthony D. Romero Executive Director 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004 (212) 549-2500 January 2009 HOW TO CLOSE GUANTÁNAMO: A PLAN Introduction Guantánamo is a scourge on America and the Constitution. It must be closed. This document outlines a five-step plan for closing Guantánamo and restoring the rule of law. Secrecy and fear have distorted the facts about Guantánamo detainees. Our plan is informed by recognition of the following critical facts, largely unknown to the public: • The government has quietly repatriated two-thirds of the 750 detainees, tacitly admitting that many should never have been held at all. • Most of the remaining detainees will not be charged as terrorists, and can be released as soon as their home country or a haven country agrees to accept them. • Trying the remaining detainees in federal court – and thus excluding evidence obtained through torture or coercion – does not endanger the public. The rule of law and the presumption of innocence serve to protect the public. Furthermore, the government has repeatedly stated that there is substantial evidence against the detainees presumed most dangerous – the High Value Detainees – that was not obtained by torture or coercion. They can be brought to trial in federal court. I. Step One: Stay All Proceedings of the Military Commissions and Impose a Deadline for Closure The President should immediately
    [Show full text]
  • Military Commissions and Aggregate Article 6 Processing (Summer 2012)
    Saint Louis University Law Journal Volume 56 Number 4 Justice Systems Circa 2011: Public Courts, Military Commissions and Aggregate Article 6 Processing (Summer 2012) 2012 Military Commissions: A Place Outside the Law’s Reach Janet Cooper Alexander Stanford Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.slu.edu/lj Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Janet C. Alexander, Military Commissions: A Place Outside the Law’s Reach, 56 St. Louis U. L.J. (2012). Available at: https://scholarship.law.slu.edu/lj/vol56/iss4/6 This Childress Lecture is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Saint Louis University Law Journal by an authorized editor of Scholarship Commons. For more information, please contact Susie Lee. SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW MILITARY COMMISSIONS: A PLACE OUTSIDE THE LAW’S REACH JANET COOPER ALEXANDER* “We have turned our backs on the law and created what we believed was a place outside the law’s reach.”1 Ten years after 9/11, it is hard to remember that the decision to treat the attacks as the trigger for taking the country to a state of war was not inevitable. Previous acts of terrorism had been investigated and prosecuted as crimes, even when they were carried out or planned by al Qaeda.2 But on September 12, 2001, President Bush pronounced the attacks “acts of war,”3 and he * Frederick I. Richman Professor of Law, Stanford Law School. I would like to thank participants at the 2011 Richard J.
    [Show full text]
  • Dropped Charges, Overturned Convictions, and Delayed Trials in Guantanamo Military Commissions
    FACT SHEET Dropped Charges, Overturned Convictions, and Delayed Trials in Guantanamo Military Commissions Those eager for swift justice against accused statements from the time of his capture because terrorism suspects have at times called for sending he was tortured, and because he had won his suspects to the military commission system in habeas petition.4 He has not since been charged Guantanamo based on fears that suspects may be with any war crimes. acquitted in a civilian court. But the track record of David Hicks: Charged in 2004 with conspiracy, the Guantanamo military commissions demonstrates attempted murder, and aiding the enemy.5 These that they offer anything but swift justice. Charges are charges were dropped in 2006. When he was routinely dropped or overturned, and the few cases charged again in 2007, he was only charged with awaiting trial are mired in delays that have dragged providing material support for terrorism, since the on for years. commissions’ convening authority concluded Federal courts, by contrast, have proven both swift there was no “probable cause” to justify the and effective at prosecuting terrorism cases.1 Over attempted murder charge.6 660 individuals have been convicted of terrorism- Binyam Mohamed: Accused of training and related crimes in federal courts since 9/11,2 in plotting attacks on targets in the United States, contrast to the eight convictions in the military including a plan to detonate a “dirty bomb,”7 and commissions (three of which have been overturned charged with conspiracy and material support for completely and one partially). Yes, suspects may be terrorism in 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • 03-334 -- Rasul V. Bush (6/28/04)
    (Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2003 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321, 337. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus RASUL ET AL. v. BUSH, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMIBA CIRCUIT No. 03–334. Argued April 20, 2004—Decided June 28, 2004* Pursuant to Congress’ joint resolution authorizing the use of necessary and appropriate force against nations, organizations, or persons that planned, authorized, committed, or aided in the September 11, 2001, al Qaeda terrorist attacks, the President sent Armed Forces into Af- ghanistan to wage a military campaign against al Qaeda and the Taliban regime that had supported it. Petitioners, 2 Australians and 12 Kuwaitis captured abroad during the hostilities, are being held in military custody at the Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, Naval Base, which the United States occupies under a lease and treaty recognizing Cuba’s ultimate sovereignty, but giving this country complete juris- diction and control for so long as it does not abandon the leased ar- eas. Petitioners filed suits under federal law challenging the legality of their detention, alleging that they had never been combatants against the United States or engaged in terrorist acts, and that they have never been charged with wrongdoing, permitted to consult counsel, or provided access to courts or other tribunals.
    [Show full text]