DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures 4.0 Introduction to the Environmental Analysis and Assumptions Used

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures 4.0 Introduction to the Environmental Analysis and Assumptions Used 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING, IMPACTS, AND MITIGATION MEASURES 4.0 INTRODUCTION TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS AND ASSUMPTIONS USED The following is an introduction to the environmental analysis project-specific and cumulative impacts and general assumptions used in the analysis. The reader is referred to the individual technical sections of the Draft EIR regarding specific assumptions and methodology used in the analysis. ANALYSIS ASSUMPTIONS GENERALLY USED TO EVALUATE THE IMPACTS OF THE MARTIS VALLEY COMMUNITY PLAN UPDATE TREATMENT OF THE THREE LAND USE MAP SCENARIOS As described in Section 3.0 (Project Description) the proposed Martis Valley Community Plan Update consists of a Proposed Land Use Diagram (PP) and 3 land use map alternatives (see Figures 3.0-5 through 3.0-8) to go with the policy document and are specifically identified below: • Existing Martis Valley General Plan Land Use Map (noted as “AA” throughout the EIR) • Alternative 1 Land Use Map (noted as “AB” throughout the EIR) • Alternative 2 Land Use Map (noted as “AC” throughout the EIR) The environmental effects of the Proposed Land Use Diagram and these three land use map alternatives are analyzed at an equal level of detail throughout the EIR, with a summary comparison of the environmental effects of each provided in Section 6.0 (Alternatives). Separate impact statements and analyses are provided for each land use map option under each environmental issue area. The following is an example of the format of the impact statements: Impact 4.7.1 Construction Water Quality Impacts PP Slope and soil disturbance associated with construction activities for the Proposed Land Use Diagram could cause accelerated soil erosion and sedimentation or the release of other pollutants to adjacent waterways. This would be a significant impact. AA Slope and soil disturbance associated with construction activities for the Existing Martis Valley General Plan Land Use Map could cause accelerated soil erosion and sedimentation or the release of other pollutants to adjacent waterways. This would be a significant impact. AB Implementation of the Alternative 1 Land Use Map would result in the same project design as the Existing Martis Valley General Plan Land Use Map and would involve on-site construction activities. This alternative would have the same impacts as Alternative AA on accelerated soil erosion and sedimentation, as well as the release of other pollutants to adjacent waterways. This would be a significant impact. AC Implementation of the Alternative 2 Land Use Map would result in a similar project design as Alternative AA. This alternative would have the similar impacts as Alternative AA on accelerated soil erosion and sedimentation, as well as the release of other pollutants to adjacent waterways as a result of onsite construction. This would be a significant impact. (analysis of impacts) PP Proposed Land Use Diagram Construction would consist of substantial grading and vegetation removal. Placer County Martis Valley Community Plan Update May 2002 Draft Environmental Impact Report 4.0-1 4.0 INTRODUCTION TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS AND ASSUMPTIONS USED AA Existing Martis Valley General Plan Land Use Map Construction would consist of substantial grading and vegetation removal. AB Alternative 1 Land Use Map The Alternative 1 Land Use Map would have nearly the same amount of required infrastructure as the Existing Martis Valley General Plan Land Use Map….. AC Alternative 2 Land Use Map The Alternative 2 Land Use Map would have….. This approach will allow the County to choose among the three land use maps without resulting in the need for additional environmental review. BUILDOUT ASSUMPTIONS Tables 3.0-2 through 3.0-5 identify land use acreages and estimated number of residential dwelling units to occur under each of the land use map options. The environmental analysis provided in the Draft EIR generally assumes that 20 percent of the residential units identified in Tables 3.0-2 through 3.0-5 would be permanent residents, while the remaining 80 percent would be second/vacation homes. This assumption is based on resort/tourist nature of the region and demographic data obtained from available Census data (complete 2000 Census data was not available at the time of preparation of this EIR), consultation with local agencies (Placer County, Town of Truckee) and other available sources. GENERAL LAND DISTURBANCE ASSUMPTIONS FOR THE THREE LAND USE MAP SCENARIOS Figures 3.0-5 through 3.0-8 identify areas anticipated to be developed that would be disturbed as a result of implementation of the Martis Valley Community Plan Update. Anticipated impacts to vegetation communities in the Plan area under the Proposed Land Use Diagram and the 3 land use map alternatives is identified in Section 4.9 (Biological Resources). The analysis also takes into account proposed (under application) and conceptual golf courses within the Plan area in areas designated as Open Space or Forest. These specific areas include the proposed Hopkins Ranch project with an 18-hole golf course (see map section 24 [DMB/Highlands Group, LLC] of Figure 3.0-2), the proposed Eaglewood project with an 18-hole golf course (see map section 23 [Martis Valley Associates LLC] of Figure 3.0-2), conceptual consideration of an 18-hole golf course at Waddle Ranch (see map sections 20 and 21 [Waddle Ranch LLC] of Figure 3.0-2), and conceptual consideration of an 18-hole and 9-hole golf courses at Siller Ranch (see map sections 26, 31, 35, and 36 [DMB/Highlands Group, LLC] of Figure 3.0-2). The proposed pattern of development illustrated in Figures 3.0-5 through 3.0-8 is the basis to evaluate project-specific and cumulative environmental effects of the proposed Martis Valley Community Plan Update in relation to all potential foreseeable development in the Plan area that could occur directly or indirectly from adoption of the Community Plan. In addition to the above, the analysis takes into account concept plans for development and/or the expansion of existing developed areas that have been presented to the public (e.g., “Completing the Vision at Northstar” see Figures 4.0-1 and 4.0-2); roadway and trail extensions under consideration as part of the Community Plan; and land ownership (e.g., private versus public ownership [U.S. Forest Service]). Martis Valley Community Plan Update Placer County Draft Environmental Impact Report May 2002 4.0-2 FIGURE 4.0-1 NORTHSTAR-AT-TAHOE COMPLETING THE VISION OVERVIEW MAP FIGURE 4.0-2 NORTHSTAR-AT-TAHOE COMPLETING THE VISION CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT MAP 4.0 INTRODUCTION TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS AND ASSUMPTIONS USED While Figures 3.0-5 through 3.0-8 identify land areas anticipated to experience substantial disturbance, land disturbance activities (e.g., rural residential development and timber production) in the remaining areas designated “Forest” would also occur. It should be noted that this information was generated to assist in qualitatively assessing overall environmental impacts to the Plan area and is not considered an exact description of future land disturbance in the Plan area. The exact extent of land area disturbance will be further defined as subsequent development projects are proposed. GENERAL ASSUMPTIONS UTILIZED FOR EVALUATING CONSTRUCTION, PHASING AND OPERATIONAL IMPACTS OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MARTIS VALLEY COMMUNITY PLAN The environmental analysis in this Draft EIR does consider environmental effects associated with construction and operation of proposed land uses in the Plan area. The extent and rate of development of the Plan area is currently unknown, and no phasing plan of development is proposed as part of the Martis Valley Community Plan Update. It is anticipated that the rate of development will be driven by market conditions. However, it is generally assumed that the first “phase” of development would likely consist of projects currently being processed by the County. These projects include Eaglewood, Hopkins Ranch, Martis Creek Estates, Village-at- Northstar, Coyote Run, Northstar-at-Tahoe Employee Housing, Northstar-at-Tahoe Unit 7A, and Schaeffer’s Camp Restaurant. APPROACH TO THE CUMULATIVE IMPACT ANALYSIS CEQA Guidelines Section 15130 requires that EIRs include an analysis of the cumulative impacts of a project when the project’s effect is considered cumulatively considerable. In general, the cumulative analysis provided in this Draft EIR is based on the existing land use plans provided by Placer County (via the Placer County General Plan and the Zoning Ordinance), the Town of Truckee (Town of Truckee General Plan and Zoning Ordinance), Nevada County (Nevada County General Plan and Zoning Ordinance), and the U.S Forest Service (Sierra Nevada Framework for Conservation and Collaboration), as well as by consideration of large-scale proposed and approved development projects listed in Table 3.0-1. Each technical section of the Draft EIR includes a description and analysis of the cumulative setting and potential environmental cumulative impacts specific to the environmental issue area (e.g. traffic, biological resources, air quality) that the proposed Martis Valley Community Plan Update would contribute to. Section 5.0 (Cumulative Impacts Summary) provides a summary of the cumulative impacts associated with the project. TERMINOLOGY USED IN THE DRAFT EIR This Draft EIR uses the following terminology to describe environmental effects of the proposed project: AA: Existing Martis Valley General Plan Land Use Map Alternative. AB: Alternative 1 Land Use Map. AC: Alternative 2 Land Use Map. Cumulative Significant Impact: A cumulative significant impact would result in a new substantial change in the environment from effects of the project when evaluated in the context of cumulative conditions in the surrounding area. Placer County Martis Valley Community Plan Update May 2002 Draft Environmental Impact Report 4.0-7 4.0 INTRODUCTION TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS AND ASSUMPTIONS USED Less Than Significant Impact: A less than significant impact would cause no substantial change in the environmental (no mitigation required).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Environmental Mitigation and Monitoring Plan (Emmp)
    ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION AND MONITORING PLAN (EMMP) Project/activity, Organizational/administrative, and Environmental Compliance Data Project/Activity Data Project/Activity Name: Feed the Future Senegal Nafoore Warsaaji Geographic Location(s) (Country/Region): Senegal/West Africa Implementation Start/End Dates: March 11, 2020- March 11, 2023 Contract/Award Number: SBAR-CPFF-72068520C00001 Implementing Partner(s): Connexus Corporation Tracking ID: Tracking ID/link of Related IEE: Tracking ID/link of Other, Related Analyses: Organizational/Administrative Data Implementing Operating Unit(s): (e.g. Mission or Bureau or Office) Lead BEO Bureau: Prepared by: Date Prepared: Submitted by: Date Submitted: Environmental Compliance Review Data Analysis Type: EMMP Additional Analyses/Reporting Required: EMMR Purpose Environmental Mitigation and Monitoring Plans (EMMPs) are required for USAID-funded projects, as specified in ADS 204, when the 22 CFR 216 documentation governing the project (e.g. the Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) specifies mitigation measures are needed. EMMPs are in important tool for translating applicable IEE conditions and mitigation measures into specific, implementable, and verifiable actions. FEED THE FUTURE SENEGAL NAFOORE WARSAAJI EMMP i An EMMP is an action plan that clearly defines: 1. Mitigation measures. Actions that reduce or eliminate potential negative environmental impacts resulting directly or indirectly from a particular project or activity, including environmental limiting factors that constrain development. 2. EMMP monitoring indicators.1 Criteria that demonstrate whether mitigation measures are suitable and implemented effectively. 3. Monitoring/reporting frequency. Timeframes for appropriately monitoring the effectiveness of each specific action. 4. Responsible parties. Appropriate, knowledgeable positions assigned to each specific action. 5. Field Monitoring/Issues. Field monitoring needs to be adequately addressed i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Procedure for Environmental Mitigation Strategy
    Roe Highway Stage 7 Doc No. REP-00-G-0005 Rev B PROCEDURE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION STRATEGY B 24/05/2004 Issued for bulletin Ian Chevis A 10/05/04 Issued for Review C. Watkins REV DATE DESCRIPTION PREPARED CHECKED APPROVED p:\7679 roe 7\alliance\23 environment\23.21 per\responses to per submissions\post per information\roe 7 environmental mitigation strategy\rep-00-g-0005-b (mitigation strategy).doc Sheet 1 of 28 Environmental Mitigation Strategy - Draft Doc No. REP-00-G-0005 Rev A Contents 1 INTRODUCTION 3 2 DEFINITION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION and OFFSETS 3 3 POTENTIAL IMPACTS OF THE ROE HIGHWAY STAGE 7 PROJECT 4 4 AVOIDANCE OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 5 5 REDUCTION IN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OR RISKS 7 6 ENVIRONMENTAL OFFSETS 8 6.1 Offset Principles 8 6.2 Policy Context – Western Australia 10 6.3 Overview of the Roe Highway Stage 7offset strategy 12 6.4 Protection of remnant vegetation through land use controls 14 6.4.1 Land Transfers, Vesting and Zoning 15 6.4.2 On-reserve conservation 16 6.4.3 Off-reserve conservation through Conservation Covenants 16 6.5 Other methods of securing high value habitat - the Bush Forever Initiative 17 6.6 Reducing risk of species extinction through targeted research 18 6.7 Restoration of degraded habitat 18 6.8 Maintaining connectivity Error! Bookmark not defined. 7 CONCLUSION 19 8 REFERENCES 20 REP-00-G-0005-B (Mitigation Strategy).doc Sheet 2 of 22 Environmental Mitigation Strategy - Draft Doc No. REP-00-G-0005 Rev A 1 INTRODUCTION The decade following the ratification and enactment of the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity in 1993 has seen important changes in environmental policy and practice.
    [Show full text]
  • PERU LNG’S Marine Terminal
    Sustainable waste management at PERU LNG’s marine terminal 2016 Maritime Award of the Americas University of Miami, February 2017 About us PERU LNG is a Peruvian company established in 2003, dedicated to the liquefaction of natural gas. It consists of a 408 km pipeline from the highlands of Peru to the LNG Plant located 165km south of Lima. The LNG Plant consists of a process train, two storage tanks, and a marine terminal. The jetty includes a 1.3 km. trestle bridge, a LNG loading platform and a 800 m. long x 25 m. wide breakwater. Shareholders: Hunt Oil, SK, Shell and Marubeni. Magnitude of the Endeavour Open sea without natural structures or protection. Strong waves up to 4.5m height versus 0.8m required for safe vessel operations. Regular dredging of navigational channel (i.e. recurrent impact versus recovery & resilience) Coexistence of maritime activities (> 60 LNG ships / year) with marine biodiversity Environmental Management at PERU LNG’s Marine Terminal Based on “environmental mitigation hierarchy” and industry best practices. Includes 4 key elements: 1. Integrated Management System. 2. Solid & Liquid waste management. 3. Pollution prevention on vessels and jetty maintenance activities. 4. Monitoring & Assurance. 1. Integrated Management System HEALTH & SAFETY: Risk Assessment Risk Control ENVIRONMENT & SOCIAL: Impact Assessment Mitigation Hierarchy QUALITY MANAGEMENT: Quality Assurance Monitoring & Control OHSAS ISO 14001 18001 Occupational Environmental PLAN DO Health & Safety Management Improve ACT CHECK ✔ ISO 9001 OSHA
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Management and Sustainable Development
    Environmental IFAD’s Management Environmental and and Social Assessment Procedures Sustainable Development IFAD Environmental and Social Assessment Procedures TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS............................................................................................................................................ v INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 1 IFAD’s Commitment to Environmental Management .............................................................................. 1 Chapter 1. ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES 7 1.1. Introduction.................................................................................................................... 7 1.2. Purpose of mainstreaming ESA .................................................................................... 7 1.3. General ESA provisions ................................................................................................ 9 1.3.1. ESA Responsibility ........................................................................................................ 9 1.3.2. Financing of Environmental and Social Assessments .................................................. 9 1.3.3. Projects initiated by co-financing institutions................................................................. 9 1.3.4. Consultation in the ESA process................................................................................... 9 1.3.5. Disclosure of documentation
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Mitigation and Regeneration Through Sustainable Farming and Food Security
    Scientific Research and Essay Vol.4 (8), pp. 773-779, August, 2009 Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/SRE ISSN 1992-2248 © 2009 Academic Journals Full Length Research Paper Environmental mitigation and regeneration through sustainable farming and food security J. H. Pen-Mogi Nyeko Gulu University, P. O. Box 166, Gulu, Uganda. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected]. Accepted 14 July, 2009 We recognized the farming practice of the communities around Keyo hills in Kilak, which is a complex and fragile ecosystem, as being purely dependent on annual food and cash crops production system and rain fed agriculture in nature. There are noticeable decline in food and cash crops production in the area. There are regular reported cases of mild to severe famine in the northern and eastern parts of Uganda. The community has resorted to overexploitation of natural resources such as charcoal burning and stone quarrying for daily subsistence. This practice is not sustainable and is environmentally destructive yet this hill is the main watershed that feeds rainwater to River Nile. Over the years, the rainfall pattern in the area has become unreliable due to environmental destruction. We designed a project that aimed at introducing perennial food and cash crops and improved livestock with high milk production to reduce poverty and ensure availability of food throughout the year. Another component of the project was to introduce the use of wood saving stoves or cooking places to reduce wastage of firewood and conserve trees. We supplied improved banana suckers to the communities to provide food security and income and with the help of Send a Cow; we received 57 in-calf heifers and 264 goats.
    [Show full text]
  • Interdependence of Biodiversity and Development Under Global Change
    Secretariat of the CBD Technical Series No. 54 Convention on Biological Diversity 54 Interdependence of Biodiversity and Development Under Global Change CBD Technical Series No. 54 Interdependence of Biodiversity and Development Under Global Change Published by the Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity ISBN: 92-9225-296-8 Copyright © 2010, Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity concern- ing the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views reported in this publication do not necessarily represent those of the Convention on Biological Diversity. This publication may be reproduced for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holders, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. The Secretariat of the Convention would appreciate receiving a copy of any publications that use this document as a source. Citation Ibisch, P.L. & A. Vega E., T.M. Herrmann (eds.) 2010. Interdependence of biodiversity and development under global change. Technical Series No. 54. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal (second corrected edition). Financial support has been provided by the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development For further information, please contact: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity World Trade Centre 413 St. Jacques Street, Suite 800 Montreal, Quebec, Canada H2Y 1N9 Phone: +1 514 288 2220 Fax: +1 514 288 6588 Email: [email protected] Website: www.cbd.int Typesetting: Em Dash Design Cover photos (top to bottom): Agro-ecosystem used for thousands of years in the vicinities of the Mycenae palace (located about 90 km south-west of Athens, in the north-eastern Peloponnese, Greece).
    [Show full text]
  • Framework for Environmental Management in Assistance Programmes International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), Assistance Division, September 2009
    Volume 92 Number 879 September 2010 REPORTS AND DOCUMENTS Framework for environmental management in assistance programmes International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), Assistance Division, September 2009 Section 1: Assistance programmes and environmental management ICRC Assistance Programmes aim to preserve or restore acceptable living condi- tions for people affected by armed conflict and other situations of violence. These victims can be highly vulnerable and are in most contexts highly dependant on their local environment for their livelihoods, health and security. As such, human health, livelihood and survival are intertwined with environmental concerns. Environmental concerns are thus directly relevant to ICRC assistance activities and must be part of them. As a leading humanitarian organisation, the ICRC has a key role to play in issuing a clear message that allows for consideration of environmental issues that affect the victims of armed conflict while ensuring that the victims themselves remain central to ICRC Assistance Programmes. This document aims to define environmental issues in the context of ICRC’s operations. It also aims to provide useful and practical guidance to Assistance delegates and national staff on two levels: how to understand the relationship between Assistance activities and the environment upon which victims of armed conflicts depend; how to consider the potential positive or negative impacts of Assistance activities, without in any way compromising the rapidity and effectiveness of ICRC action; doi:10.1017/S1816383110000573 747 Reports and Documents how to continue to develop an environmentally alert mindset and to enable environmental issues to be systematically integrated into the balance of factors that need to be considered to produce an efficient, effective and rapid ICRC response.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Resilient Participatory Afforestation and Reforestation Project
    Climate Resilient Participatory Afforestation and Reforestation Project Environmental Management Framework Bangladesh Forest Department & Arannayk Foundation May, 2013 i Table of Contents Abbreviations .................................................................................................................................v Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................... vi 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................1 1.1 General .......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose of EMF ............................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT ................................................................................3 2.1 Project Development Objectives .................................................................................................. 3 2.2 Project Locations ........................................................................................................................... 3 2.3 Project Implementing Agencies .................................................................................................... 3 2.4 Project Components ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Project Environmental Mitigation Costs – Case Studies
    Project Environmental Mitigation Costs – Case Studies Fourth Edition November 2013* Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Information Materials can be provided in alternative formats by calling the ADA Compliance Manager at 360-705-7097. Persons who are deaf or hard of hearing may contact that number via the Washington Relay Service at 7-1-1. Title VI Notice to the Public It is Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) policy to ensure no person shall, on the grounds of race, color, national origin, or sex, as provided by Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise discriminated against under any of its federally funded programs and activities. Any person who believes his/her Title VI protection has been violated may file a complaint with WSDOT’s Office of Equal Opportunity (OEO). For Title VI complaint forms and advice, please contact OEO’s Title VI Coordinator at 360-705-7082 or 509-324-6018. *Please note: in November some discrepancies were found in the numbers reported in various tables. These discrepancies were fixed and this revised edition published in November 2013. Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 1 Methodologies Used in the 2013 Study ........................................................................................................ 3 Temporary Mitigation ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ecosystem-Based Adaptation and Mitigation in Botswana's Communal
    Ecosystem-Based Adaptation and Mitigation in Botswana’s Communal Rangelands ANNEX 6: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) and Environmental and Social Management Plan (ESMP) Prepared by Conservation International and C4 EcoSolutions through a PPF grant from the Green Climate Fund ESIA and ESMP Table of Contents 1. Executive summary .................................................................................................... 4 2. Introduction............................................................................................................... 9 3. Project Description .................................................................................................. 10 3.1. Strengthening community institutions and gender equitable capacity for collective action 11 3.2. Building individual capacity in herders and the community .......................................... 12 3.3. Supporting climate smart land and livestock management ........................................... 13 3.4. Strengthening mitigation & adaptive capacity across the value-chain for long-term sustainability.......................................................................................................................... 14 3.5. Knowledge sharing and mechanisms for continual improvement and replication .......... 15 4. Policy, legal and administrative framework ............................................................. 16 4.1. Governance, decentralisation and resource management instruments ......................... 16 4.2. Environmental
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Conflict
    Environmental Conflict: What’s gender got to do with it? An Honors Thesis for the Peace and Justice Studies Program Arlen R. Weiner Tufts University, 2013 Acknowledgements Many people contributed to the success of this thesis. I would like to thank the International Relations program for the research scholarship that allowed me to conduct research in preparation for this project, and Tufts Institute for the Environment for the generous use of their office space and supplies. To Professor Jeanne Marie Penvenne and Jenna DiCocco, for the invaluable academic and moral support throughout this process. And the most special thank you to Professor Paul Joseph, who inspired the initial vision for this project and continued to provide indispensible encouragement, guidance, and friendship. ii Table of Contents Abstract..............................................................................................................................iv Introduction........................................................................................................................1 1. The Linkages between Environment and Conflict .....................................................9 2. Gender and Environmental Conflict .........................................................................22 I. Gender and Conflict............................................................................................22 II. Gender and the Environment ............................................................................39 III. Bridging the Gap: A Gender Analysis
    [Show full text]
  • In Defense of Ecosystem Services J.B
    Vanderbilt University Law School Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications Faculty Scholarship 2016 In Defense of Ecosystem Services J.B. Ruhl Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/faculty-publications Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation J.B. Ruhl, In Defense of Ecosystem Services, 32 Pace Environmental Law Review. 306 (2016) Available at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/faculty-publications/480 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. +(,121/,1( Citation: 32 Pace Envtl. L. Rev. 306 2015 Content downloaded/printed from HeinOnline (http://heinonline.org) Thu Dec 10 16:31:20 2015 -- Your use of this HeinOnline PDF indicates your acceptance of HeinOnline's Terms and Conditions of the license agreement available at http://heinonline.org/HOL/License -- The search text of this PDF is generated from uncorrected OCR text. -- To obtain permission to use this article beyond the scope of your HeinOnline license, please use: https://www.copyright.com/ccc/basicSearch.do? &operation=go&searchType=0 &lastSearch=simple&all=on&titleOrStdNo=0738-6206 420 2015 408 PM RUHL FINAL MACRO 2-23-152 23 15 4/20/2015 4:08 I'M THE TWENTIETH ANNUAL LLOYD K. GARRISON LECTURE In Defense of Ecosystem Services J.B. RUHL* It is a great honor and pleasure to deliver the Garrison lecture at the Pace University Law School, especially on an evening during which we have paid fitting tribute to the lives of two giants of environmental law and policy, Joe Sax, and David Sive.
    [Show full text]